Scribd
Upload
8K views1 page

320 CRPC Petition

This document is a petition filed in the Court of LD. ACJM at Baruipur requesting to compromise a case. It summarizes that the petition was filed by the de-facto complainant through his lawyer to compromise litigation against two accused charged under section 325 of IPC. It states that talks of compromise have been ongoing between the parties and the de-facto complainant has no objection if the accused are discharged from the case. The petitioner requests the court to accept the compromise between the parties.

Uploaded by

Sankar Nath Chakraborty
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
8K views1 page

320 CRPC Petition

This document is a petition filed in the Court of LD. ACJM at Baruipur requesting to compromise a case. It summarizes that the petition was filed by the de-facto complainant through his lawyer to compromise litigation against two accused charged under section 325 of IPC. It states that talks of compromise have been ongoing between the parties and the de-facto complainant has no objection if the accused are discharged from the case. The petitioner requests the court to accept the compromise between the parties.

Uploaded by

Sankar Nath Chakraborty
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

District: - South 24 Parganas.

BEFORE THE COURT OF LD. ACJM AT BARUIPUR


Ref. :- G.R. Case No. 2641 of 2008
(Sonarpur P.S. Case No. 864/2008)

State
(Bimal Bera De-facto Complainant)

Leave Petition -Vs.-

Mangala Mondal & Champak Mondal

------------Accused

Humble Petition filed u/s 320(2) of the

Cr.P.C by the above named De-facto

Complainant.

Most respectfully sheweth:-

1. That today is fixed for evidence for this instant Case.

2. That the petition is filed by the aforesaid De-facto Complainant in the above
numbered case through his Ld. Advocate duly represented him by filing fresh
VAKALTNAMA, with this Petition.

3. That the Charge Sheet No. 596, dated 27/10/2008, has been filed by the Concerned
P.S., in the above numbered Case, against the Two accused under Sections 325 of
IPC.

4. That a talk of Compromise has been continuing between the Parties amicably, so that
the De-facto Complainant, the Victim, are seeking Leave of the Ld. Court to
compromise the above mention litigation forthwith. There is no need for the case to
be proceeded with further.

5. That the aforesaid De-facto Complainant has no objection if the Accused are
discharged from this instant Case.

Hence it is prayed that this Ld. Court


may accept and effect the compromise between
the parties by allowing this petition and pass
such Order/Orders as your Honour may deem fit
and proper for the ends of Justice.

And for the act of kindness your Petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray .

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy