Housing First Manual Sample
Housing First Manual Sample
First
The Pathways Model to End
Homelessness for People
with Mental Health and
Substance Use Disorders
Unless a statement on the page grants permission, no part of this publication, either print
or electronic, may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the express written
permission of the publisher. Failure to comply with these terms may expose you to legal
action and damages for copyright infringement.
Tsemberis, Sam J.
Housing first : the Pathways model to end homelessness for people with mental health and
substance use disorders / Sam Tsemberis.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-61649-649-4
1. Homeless persons--Housing--United States. 2. Homeless persons--Housing. 3. Homeless
persons--Services for--United States. 4. Mentally ill homeless persons--Services for--United
States. 5. Homeless persons--Substance use--United States. I. Title.
HV4505.T74 2010
363.5'9740973--dc22
2010035376
20 19 18 17 16 15 123456
Editor’s note: The names, details, and circumstances may have been changed to protect the
privacy of those mentioned in this publication.
The suggestions and model documents in this book are not meant to substitute for the advice
of lawyers, accountants, or other professionals.
Evidence-Based
The DartmouthResources for Behavioral
PRC–Hazelden imprintHealth
was formed as a partnership between
the Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (PRC) and Hazelden Publishing, a divi-
sion of the Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation—nonprofit leaders in the research and
development of evidence-based resources for behavioral health.
Our mission is to create and publish a comprehensive, state-of-the-art line
of professional resources—including curricula, books, multimedia tools, and
staff-development training materials—to serve professionals treating people with
mental health, addiction, and co-occurring disorders at every point along the
continuum of care.
For more information about Dartmouth PRC–Hazelden and our collection of
professional products, visit the Hazelden Behavioral Health Evolution website at
www.bhevolution.org.
to Cherie, Elena, and Alex
who taught me about love
Foreword xiii
Acknowledgments xv
Introduction 1
Homelessness: A Global Problem 1
About Housing First and This Manual 4
Who Should Read This Manual—and Why 6
How to Use This Manual 6
Chapter Overview 6
Terminology 8
Chapter 1
The Pathways Housing First Program 11
Why It Works 11
The Origins of Housing First: An Alternative
to Linear Residential Treatment 13
The Principles of Housing First 18
Chapter 1 Summary 30
CONTENTS
Chapter 2
Initial Program Steps 33
Client Demographics 33
Determining Eligibility 35
Referrals to phf Programs 36
The Engagement Process 37
Preparing for the Apartment Search 43
Initial and Ongoing Services 44
Chapter 2 Summary 45
Chapter 3
Housing and Housing Support Services 47
Why Housing First? 48
The Two Program Requirements 48
First Steps to Securing Housing 50
Criteria for Choosing an Apartment 52
Leasing or Subleasing through phf 55
Tenant Responsibilities and Rights 56
Security and Safety Issues: The Basics 57
Making a Home: Physical and Emotional Comfort 58
Landlords 61
Collaborative Roles in Housing phf Clients 63
Some Common Property Management Challenges 65
Personal Relationships: Building and Reconnecting 67
When Relocation Is Necessary 69
Chapter 3 Summary 74
viii
CONTENTS
Chapter 4
An Interdisciplinary Approach: How the ACT and
ICM Teams Serve Clients in a PHF Program 77
A Community-Based Interdisciplinary Approach 77
Matching Clients with the Right Level of Service 78
act and icm Teams: Differences and Similarities 79
Comprehensive Assessment and Treatment Planning 80
The Art and Science of the Home Visit 83
Renewing Team Practice and Team Process 88
Chapter 4 Summary 89
Chapter 5
The PHF Assertive Community Treatment Team 91
Assertive Community Treatment Teams: How They Work
in a phf Program 92
The act Team Members 96
The act Team’s Morning Meeting 116
A Hypothetical Morning Meeting 126
The act Weekly Case Conference 127
Chapter 5 Summary 127
Chapter 6
The PHF Intensive Case Management Team 129
The icm Strengths Model of Service Delivery 129
The icm Team Members 132
The icm Weekly Team Meeting 145
Chapter 6 Summary 145
ix
CONTENTS
Chapter 7
Incorporating Other Evidence-Based Practices 147
Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment 148
Wellness Management and Recovery 158
Supported Employment 161
Groups and Social Events 163
Community Integration 164
Chapter 7 Summary 165
Chapter 8
Bringing Pathways Housing First to Your Community 167
Assessing the Need and Making the Case for a phf Program 167
A Local Champion: One Key to Successful Implementation 168
Obtaining Funding for the Two phf Program Components 171
Launching a phf Program 174
The Important First Year—and Beyond 176
Chapter 8 Summary 177
Appendices
Appendix A: Research and Evaluation 181
Appendix B: Some Administrative Considerations 191
Appendix C: Sample Forms 195
Appendix C-1: The act Team Morning Meeting
Description and Checklist 197
Appendix C-2: Furniture List and Client Shopping List 201
Appendix C-3: Pre-Move-In Apartment Readiness Checklist 205
Appendix C-4: Use and Occupancy Agreement 207
Appendix C-5: Pathways Housing First Program Fidelity:
The Essential Ingredients Checklist 215
x
CONTENTS
Notes 231
References 233
Index 237
About the Author 243
xi
Foreword
Some people, convinced on principle, “get” the idea of Housing First instantly.
Others are more skeptical, convinced by their training that people with mental
health disorders and substance use disorders are incapable of making wise decisions
for themselves. In 1998, I was part of the team conducting the first experimental
evaluation of Pathways Housing First. Founder Sam Tsemberis—everyone calls him
Sam—had already shown in two published studies that Pathways tenants were more
stable in their housing than clients in other programs designed for people with long
histories of homelessness and serious psychiatric disabilities known as severe mental
disorders. Traditionally trained social service providers from the other programs,
which required clients to be clean and sober and participate in treatment in order to
have a bed of their own in a congregate facility, claimed that Sam must be working
with a different group of people—that their clients could not succeed in a model
where homeless people are given independent apartments with a panoply of services
but without close supervision. It seemed time to put Sam’s model to a more rigorous
test, randomly assigning some people to Pathways to Housing and others to tradi-
tional programs to create a fair comparison.
Recruitment to the study was lagging, so we held a breakfast for outreach
workers to explain the experiment and to urge them to refer more people. One out-
reach worker ate our bagels but argued that it would not be ethical to refer the cli-
ents she worked with to the study: they might get randomly assigned to receive their
own apartment, and that, she insisted, would be setting them up for failure. A couple
weeks later, we caught a break. A study participant who had been randomly assigned
FOREWORD
to Pathways to Housing invited his family and his former outreach worker over to
dinner to show off his new apartment. The outreach worker was so impressed by
the transformation of the disheveled denizen of the street into a gracious host that
he told all the other workers at his agency. They responded by referring dozens of
clients to the study, and we finished up recruitment with a bang.
Of course, the outreach worker’s epiphany could have been based on an
anomalous case. But the evidence from the study was convincing: over the first year,
people randomly assigned to the Pathways program spent ninety-nine fewer days
homeless than individuals in the control group, and they used substances at no
greater rates. Pathways participants got housed faster and stayed housed longer. The
enormous differences between experimental and control groups gradually narrowed
over time as more control group members found their way indoors, but a study
published in 2004 found that the Pathways tenants were still far more likely to be
housed at the end of the four-year experiment. Nonetheless, I have no way of know-
ing whether the skeptical outreach worker at that breakfast was convinced.
By now, Housing First has garnered so much acclaim that everyone claims to
be doing it, no matter how little their programs resemble the Pathways to Housing
model. Pathways Housing First is neither a “housing only” approach, nor does it
offer “worker-knows-best” services coupled with immediate housing. It is a suc-
cessful, rigorously documented, systematic approach to serving homeless people
with substance use and mental health disorders. This manual clarifies the ethos
and practices of Pathways Housing First. We hope it will also begin to change the
standard training that still makes it hard for many social service professionals to give
up coercive control—no matter how artfully it may be disguised—and support the
choices of the people with whom they work.
xiv
Acknowledgments
This book owes its existence to the many remarkable people, past and present,
whom I met as clients served by Pathways to Housing and its predecessors, Choices
Unlimited and the 44th Street Independence Support Center drop-in centers. By
bringing together the essential elements of our many heated and passionate conver-
sations about choice, power, rights, poverty, privacy, disabilities, and abilities, we
were able to develop, design, implement, and operate the Pathways Housing First
program. I had the good fortune to have Bill Anthony, David Shern, Mikal Cohen,
and Howie the Harp as early collaborators in our “taking psych rehab to the streets”
grant. Our 44th Street drop-in center was modeled after Howie’s consumer-operated
Independence Support Center in Oakland. Rachel Efron, Hilary Melton, and Ed
Rooney were influential staff members who ensured that our priority lay in taking
care of the needs of our clients, and not of the programs.
In the early nineties, when Housing First was considered a risky venture, Bert
Pepper, Mary Brosnahan, and Elmer Struening, national experts in mental health
and advocates for ending homelessness, risked their reputations in order to sup-
port our work by joining our board. Since then, Housing First has been replicated
in hundreds of cities by innumerable local champions who have started Pathways
programs in their own communities, and as of 2011, Pathways to Housing became
Pathways to Housing National. We've had welcome support from Philip Mangano,
Ann O’Hara, and Nan Roman, all of whom have been prolific advocates for using
Housing First as a means of abolishing what Mangano has called “the national
disgrace of homelessness.”
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
There were many lessons learned from early program replications, the ones
that took place when most providers could still not believe that with the right
support people with mental health disorders could live on their own in their own
apartments. These replications—the ones created before the evidence base was
available—were the most challenging and required the greatest investment from our
stakeholders. It took enormous courage for Nancy Travers to import the program
into Westchester County. Marti Kinsley had the political will and willingness to risk
importing Pathways to Washington, dc. The program in the nation’s capital would
not have been possible without Nan Roman’s advocacy and the generosity of the
Abell Foundation. In the early years, my friend and writing mentor Jay Neugeboren
put our program on the national map by describing it in his book Transforming
Madness: New Lives for People Living with Mental Illness.
This book would not have been possible without the ingenious researchers who
conducted the rigorous longitudinal randomized controlled trials that have charted
the development and effectiveness of Pathways as an evidence-based program.
This group includes Sara Asmussen, Beth Shinn, and especially Ana Stefancic, our
director of research, who also provided the research summary for this volume.
Their articles led to program dissemination that created hundreds of Housing First
programs that have, across the country, succeeded in ending homelessness for many
thousands of people.
In 2010, the Mental Health Commission of Canada was at the midpoint of
a $110 million, longitudinal randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness
of our Housing First program in five Canadian cities. This continues to be an
unprecedented and enormous social science experiment, and it is a great honor
to be working with a talented Canadian team that includes Paula Goering, who
directs the research, and Jayne Barker and Cam Keller, who direct the project at
the Commission. I am grateful to Tim Richter, director of the Calgary Homeless
Foundation and advocate for the Housing First approach. With Tim’s able assistance
and the collaboration of our colleagues at the Alex Community Health Centre, we
were awarded a knowledge dissemination grant from the Canadian government. I
am extremely indebted to all my Canadian compatriots because my participation in
their projects, and what I learned as a participant, have helped make the writing of
this book possible.
xvi
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Canadian programs have fewer fiscal constraints then those in the United
States. In part because Canadians have national health insurance, the financial
operations of our programs in Canada have few restrictions placed upon them.
This creates an environment where funding does not impinge upon clinical prac-
tice (e.g., requiring a fixed number of visits per client in order to be reimbursed).
It became easy to see, and thus to be able to describe, how it is possible for the
Pathways Housing First program to operate across a wide variety of settings.
Juliana Walker, who has served as our director of training and worked with me on
the Canadian projects, contributed enormously to this volume by writing early
drafts, editing others, and helping to clarify and describe various aspects of team
operations. (Since 2011, the Mental Health Commission of Canada made Housing
First a national policy for its At Home/Chez Soi project, requiring 65 percent of
homelessness funding monies be used for such Housing First activities.)
Bob Drake, my friend and colleague at Dartmouth, has been supportive of our
program. Among other things, Bob helped Ana Stefancic and me as we shaped the
research on program fidelity. But a book needs a publisher, and Bob introduced
me to Sid Farrar of Hazelden Publishing. Sid’s enthusiasm, and his professional-
ism, made the process painless and efficient. I am most grateful to Cynthia Orange,
my editor at Hazelden who suggested changes in structure and content that have
improved the book and made it readable, and who offered invaluable guidance,
along with a gentle therapeutic touch, throughout our collaboration. Thank you, too,
to Mindy Keskinen—you brought it all together and took it to the finish line.
Above all, I want to acknowledge the support and love I receive from my wife,
Cherie, and our children Elena and Alex. Their patience during family vacations
and other times that I have had to spend away from them, and their acceptance and
understanding, have made it possible for me to complete this project. Most sum-
mers we visit yiayia (my mother; my children’s grandmother) in Skoura, a village in
southern Greece. In this village of some five hundred people, everyone is included in
kafenio at the center of town: old and young, rich and poor, some with mental health
problems and some without. It is a place where there is respect and acceptance of
all—just as it is at Pathways to Housing.
All royalties from the sale of this book will be contributed to Pathways to Housing.
xvii
Introduction
“
As originators of Housing First, Pathways to Housing National’s
mission is to transform lives by ending homelessness and
supporting recovery for those with mental health challenges.
”
•• providing support and treatment based on choice and
services that support recovery, social inclusion, and
community integration
•• and conducting research and training to develop best
practices for recovery-oriented care
Pathways to Housing National mission statement
1
INTRODUCTION
them more in common than the differences that divide them. Access to affordable
housing and treatment is an almost universal barrier for this population worldwide.
Estimating the number of people who are homeless and who have mental health
disorders presents complex methodological and epidemiological challenges because
definitions of homelessness and mental disorders vary across countries and across
cultures. In 2004, the United Nations provided a practical and useful definition:
Further complications arise because counting the number of people who are
homeless and have mental health disorders is not simply a matter of identifying indi-
vidual or demographic characteristics of this population. This number can also be
viewed as an index of a nation’s failed social service, housing, and mental health poli-
cies. Thus, the number of people who are homeless can be seen as a consequence
of larger social problems. Research on the Gini coefficient is one way to illustrate
this point. This coefficient is a commonly used measure of a nation’s income
disparity—the distance between rich and poor. A 2000 World Health Organization
study reported that developed European countries and Canada had Gini indices
between .24 and .36, while the United States and Mexico were both at .46 and Brazil
and South Africa at .61. Of relevance here is that social scientists report that there is
a negative correlation between the Gini coefficient and the percentage of a nation’s
budget spent on social and mental health services.2 Countries whose social and
mental health policies provide financial and other support to those at the bottom of
the income distribution are also the countries with lower levels of homelessness.3 It
is not surprising that, in general, advocates accuse governments of underestimating
the number of homeless, and government representatives say that advocates tend
to overestimate. For example, the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development (hud) conducts a nationwide “one-night count” of the homeless every
year. The count is conducted late at night in the middle of winter. In 2014, the most
recent year for which data is available, hud estimated more than 578,000 people
2
INTRODUCTION
3
INTRODUCTION
“”
About Housing First and This Manual
Founded in 1992 in New York City, Pathways to Housing, Inc. is a nonprofit cor-
poration that is widely credited as being the originator of the Housing First model
of addressing homelessness among people with mental health and substance use
disorders. Put simply, Pathways’ unique approach is this: provide housing first,
and then combine that housing with supportive services and treatment services.
Research studies examining this model have shown that it dramatically reduces
homelessness and is significantly more effective than traditional treatment and
housing models. Because the Pathways model is so distinctive—providing services
through a consumer-driven treatment philosophy and providing scattered-site
housing in independent apartments—we refer to it as the Pathways Housing First
(phf) program to distinguish it from other programs that also identify with the
Housing First approach. The phf program is built on more than two decades of
clinical and operational experience, manuals, fidelity standards, and research find-
ings, attesting to the model’s effectiveness. After a 2007 peer review of these stud-
ies and other materials, the phf program was entered into the National Registry
of Evidence-based Programs maintained by samhsa, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services.
Today, the phf program has been replicated in more than one hundred cities
across the United States, and a growing number of programs are in place in Europe,
Australia, and through the At Home/Chez Soi project, nationally in Canada.
The Pathways to Housing success has not gone unnoticed. Among its many
honors, Pathways to Housing was awarded the Excellence in Innovation Award
from the National Council for Community Behavioral Health Care, which rep-
resents 1,300 U.S. organizations that provide treatment and rehabilitation for
people with mental health and substance use disorders. The phf program also
earned the American Psychiatric Association’s Gold Award, ranking it first among
4
INTRODUCTION
community mental health programs. (A list of other awards can be found in this
book’s appendix E.)
The phf program is a proven, effective, cost-saving approach for both the
street-dwelling homeless and those staying in shelters, jails, state hospitals, or
other institutions. The problem of homelessness among adults with severe mental
disorders still persists, of course, but with the phf approach, this issue can now be
effectively addressed on a large scale. In June 2010, the U.S. Interagency Council on
Homelessness (www.usich.gov) unveiled the federal five-year plan to end homeless-
ness, and this plan includes Housing First as one of its five core strategies.
This manual was created after Pathways to Housing received countless inqui-
ries from agencies and individuals wanting to replicate the successful phf program
in their own countries and communities. Written from the point of view of phf staff,
this manual describes the fundamentals of the phf program—including the phi-
losophy, principles, and values that guide its thought, operation, and administration.
Because the needs, goals, and capabilities of each agency and potential program
implementer are so varied, this manual is intended not only for readers planning to
introduce the phf model into new locations, but also for those seeking to integrate
phf’s ideals into more traditional programs. Those who intend to adopt and operate
a phf program will want to seek more specific direction from qualified phf experts
on launching and operating the program.
Although phf sounds very simple and practical, it is actually a complex clinical
and housing intervention. As with other complex clinical interventions, master-
ing this program requires practice and supervision. Because phf is based on the
principles of consumer choice and individualized treatment, it is impossible to
anticipate or describe how the program will unfold for each and every client. This
manual offers guidance, principles, procedures, and clinical experience as a frame-
work. Translating these principles and procedures into day-to-day decisions based
on input from each client requires training and supervised practice. Because every
client makes unique choices, no two days in a phf program are ever alike. Even if
your community lacks the capacity to begin a full-scale phf program, this manual
can help you begin a practice or a small program that respects and responds to the
voices of men, women, and families who want nothing more than to attain what
should always be attainable: a home.
5
INTRODUCTION
Chapter Overview
Chapter 1, “The Pathways Housing First Program,” introduces the phf approach,
describing the origins of the model and its clinical and philosophical foundations.
6
INTRODUCTION
7
INTRODUCTION
steps toward launching a phf program in their area. It includes a brief discussion of
possible funding sources and offers some advice on connecting and working with
various governmental and not-for-profit agencies.
Each chapter ends with a summary of the key points discussed. The manual
concludes with information about the Pathways Housing First Institute for training
and technical assistance. This manual’s appendices contain reviews of the quan-
titative and qualitative research on the phf program and provide the results of
several cost-effectiveness studies from several cities. They also contain a sample of
some of the documents and forms commonly used in phf programs; a discussion
of common administrative concerns; and a list of awards honoring Pathways to
Housing and its founder, Dr. Sam Tsemberis.
Terminology
This glossary explains some terms commonly used in phf programs.
ACT team: For clients with severe mental disorders and multiple needs, assertive
community treatment (ACT) teams are composed of multidisciplinary staff
members who directly provide clinical and support services. The act team as
a whole is the service provider, offering around-the-clock on-call services and
maintaining a low participant-to-staff ratio.
ICM team: For moderately disabled clients, intensive case management (ICM)
teams are composed of clinicians or other caseworkers. icm teams use a “case-
load” practice model with a ratio of about ten to twenty participants per staff
member. Staff are available on call; the phf model recommends that one case
manager be available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. (Many other
Housing First programs offer twelve-hour coverage, perhaps using another
crisis line service to implement around-the-clock on-call service.)
Client: A person receiving services in the phf program, also referred to as consumer,
participant, or tenant.
8
INTRODUCTION
will be delivered to them. Clients are asked for their preference in type of
housing (almost all choose an apartment of their own), location, furnishings,
and other personal amenities. Clients also determine the type, sequence, and
intensity of services and treatment options (rather than the clinician or pro-
vider dictating these). While the phf program offers many choices, it also has
two requirements: (1) participants must agree to a weekly apartment visit by
program staff, and (2) they must agree to the terms and conditions of a stan-
dard lease, including paying 30 percent of their income toward rent.
Pathways Housing First (phf): This term is used throughout the manual to refer to
the Pathways Housing First program.
9