Monitoring Fouling Ballast
Monitoring Fouling Ballast
LEVELS OF BALLAST
MANJUL MATHUR
CGE/SC RAILWAY
MONITORING FOULING LEVELS
• Availability of BCMs
• Availability of ballast through Depot collections.
• All Zonal Railways are now carrying out 25-35
Kms of Deep screening every year.
• Condition of ballast!
• Fouling measured and monitored-
-Timings of deep screening
-Enhance the life of costliest component of track-
RAIL.
• Ballast Functions
• Ballast Fouling
• Ballast Fouling and settlements
• Ballast Fouling- Track Modulus- Rail stresses
• Deep screening – Present instructions
• Studies carried out ERRI
• Practices followed by World Railways
• Formula suggested by RDSO- field measurements
• Observations and recommendations
• Ground Penetrating Radars.
• Distribute the high wheel loads uniformly on
the subgrade while providing an elastic
support to rail sleeper assembly.
• Provide elasticity and resilience to track in
order to reduce the dynamic stresses.
• Secure vertical and lateral alignment- to
provide medium for correction of track
geometry.
• Be sufficiently permeable to drain off rain
water.
– Grain size distribution with sufficient voids
– Angular stones to retain packing.
1. OPERATIONAL LOADS:
• TAMPING
HAN & SELIG
120%
• An increase of 30% in U will reduce the
stresses due to vertical load by 10%.
• By Monitoring Fouling levels- timely Deep
screenings- Track Modulus- Rail stresses
can be kept under check.
• Once in 10 years
• Caking results in unsatisfactory riding.
• Clean cushion less than 150/200 mm on
continuous stretch
• Caking up of cushion and loss of resiliency
manifests in excessive rail/weld failure.
• Need for intermediate screening decided
by Chief Engineer.
SC RAILWAY
DEEP
SCREENING
4%- 5%
Track budget
• ORE Report D 182/RP3 mentions of a Large scale
tri-axial tests carried out at the Institute for
Geotechnology of ETH in Zuirch, Switzerland to
determine effect of aging on mechanical properties
of ballast.
• ERRI consider fouling index as the percentage
passing 22.4 mm sieve.
• Material for testing- ballast removed from running
line.
• Material reduced to constituent fractions by
screening and then combined in different
proportions with different degree of fouling
• 27 Large scale tri-axial tests conducted.
• Specimen subjected to 100,000 load reversals to
simulate the realistic traffic conditions.
• Ballast is essentially in tri-axial state of compression
with surrounding ballast giving confining pressure
and moving wheel loads giving deviator stress.
• Confining pressure of 30 Km/m2 and deviator stress
of 180 KN/m2 to 260 KN/m2 was applied.
• Finally the specimen were subjected to tri-axial test
until fracture.
• Important results:
• Density increases with level of fouling- Max at 70%-
tough hard and impenetrable- load on rails and
sleepers.
• New ballast- stiff- elastic manner
• Soiled ballast- stiffness declines- fine particles
causes slipping of grains- with load soiled ballast
dilates- plastic deformations or settlements.
• Energy absorption remains unaltered upto 50 %
fouling.
• Shear strength remain unaltered upto 70% fouling.
• Screening suggested at 30- 40% fouling.
• American Railways:
• F1 = P 4 + P 200
• Where P4 = percent passing the 4.75mm (No. 4)
sieve and
• P200 = percent passing the 0.075 mm (No 200)
sieve.
• South African Railways (Spoornet):
• Fv = (0.4 F19) +(0.3 F6.7) +(0.2 F1.18) +(0.1
F0.15)
• Where
• F19 = (% undersize 19mm sieve)x100/27
• F6.7 = (% undersize 6.7mm sieve)x100/18
• F1.18 = (% undersize 1.18mm sieve)x100/11.5
• F0.15 = (% undersize 0.15mm sieve)x100/5.5
• Cleaning is to be carried out when Fv 80%
• Australian Railways:
• F1P = P 0.075 + P 13.2
• Where P0.075 = percent passing the 0.075mm
sieve and
• P13.2 = percent passing the 13.2 mm sieve.
• RDSO:
• FI = 0.3(P40-50) + (0.3 P20) +(0.3 P10) +(0.4
P4.75)*
• P40, P20, P10 & P4.75 are % passing on 40mm,
20mm, 10 mm & 4.75mm sieve.
• *Underlined factor is to be omitted if it is –ve.
TO WADI
BELLA GUNTAKA
RY L TO
208.06 253.45 RENIGUNT
A
BLOCK KM/TP
SECTION
FM- BDVL Km.21/3-4
FM- BDVL Km.27/6-7
MBNR- MQN Km. 122/16-17
MBNR- MQN Km.124/3-4
SECTIONAL DETAILS BALLAST DETAILS
ROUTE SC- DHONE(SL) ORIGINAL CUSHION 250 mm
SECTION SSE/P.Way/KCG PRESENT CLEAN 100 mm
CUSHION
BETWEEN STNS FM-BDVL PRESENT CAKED 150 mm
CUSHION
TYPE OF SOIL GRANNULAR LAST DEEP SCREENED 2003-04
ON (7)
HEIGHT OF 0.30
BANK
SECTIONAL 100 Kmph MAINTENANCE DETAILS
SPEED
TYPE MACHINE
TGI VALUES OF 51, 89, 91,72,79
SEIVE ANALYSIS LAST 5 RUNS
SEIV WEIGHT CUMM. % AGE % AGE
E RETAIN RETAINE RETAINE PASSIN
TRAFFIC DETAILS
SIZE ED (kg) D (kg) D G
(mm) AXLE LOAD 20.32tonnes
40 7.5 7.5 18.99 81.01
ANNUAL GMT 19.74
20 21.5 29 73.42 26.58
10 2.5 31.5 79.75 20.25
4.75 1.5 33 83.54 16.46 CRITERIA
< 6.5 39.5 100 0 SPEED>1 GMT> 30 FI > 30
4.75 20
FOULING INDEX F1=29.94 <35 >100 >15 >35
SECTIONAL DETAILS BALLAST DETAILS
ROUTE SC- DHONE(SL) ORIGINAL CUSHION 250 mm
SECTION SSE/P.Way/KCG PRESENT CLEAN 100 mm
CUSHION
BETWEEN STNS FM-BDVL PRESENT CAKED 150 mm
CUSHION
TYPE OF SOIL GRANNULAR LAST DEEP SCREENED 2003-04
ON (7)
HEIGHT OF 0.20
BANK
SECTIONAL 100 Kmph MAINTENANCE DETAILS
SPEED
TYPE MACHINE
TGI VALUES OF 49, 85, 91,79,61
SEIVE ANALYSIS LAST 5 RUNS
SEIV WEIGHT CUMM. % AGE % AGE
E RETAIN RETAINE RETAINE PASSIN
TRAFFIC DETAILS
SIZE ED (kg) D (kg) D G
(mm) AXLE LOAD 20.32tonnes
40 7.2 7.2 19.1 80.9
ANNUAL GMT 19.74
20 20.3 27.5 72.94 27.06
10 2.8 30.3 80.37 19.63
4.75 1.8 32.1 85.15 14.85 CRITERIA
< 5.6 37.7 100 0 SPEED>1 GMT> 30 FI > 30
4.75 20
FOULING INDEX F1=29.22 <35 >100 >15 >35
SECTIONAL DETAILS BALLAST DETAILS
ROUTE SC- DHONE(SL) ORIGINAL CUSHION 300 mm
SECTION SSE/P.Way/MBNR PRESENT CLEAN 140 mm
CUSHION
BETWEEN STNS MBNR- MQN PRESENT CAKED 160 mm
CUSHION
TYPE OF SOIL GRANNULAR LAST DEEP 1998-
SCREENED ON 99(12)
HEIGHT OF 0.40
BANK
SECTIONAL 100 Kmph MAINTENANCE DETAILS
SPEED
TYPE MACHINE
TGI VALUES OF 109,108,110,79,8
SEIVE ANALYSIS LAST 5 RUNS 9
SEIV WEIGHT CUMM. % AGE % AGE
E RETAIN RETAINE RETAINE PASSIN
TRAFFIC DETAILS
SIZE ED (kg) D (kg) D G
(mm) AXLE LOAD 20.32tonnes
40 7 7 9.21 90.79
ANNUAL GMT 15.96
20 44.5 51.5 67.76 32.24
10 13.5 65 85.53 14.47
4.75 5 70 92.11 7.89 CRITERIA
< 6 76 100 0 SPEED>1 GMT> 30 FI > 30
4.75 20
FOULING INDEX F1=29.41 <35 >100 >15 >35
SECTIONAL DETAILS BALLAST DETAILS
ROUTE SC- DHONE(SL) ORIGINAL CUSHION 300 mm
SECTION SSE/P.Way/MBNR PRESENT CLEAN 150 mm
CUSHION
BETWEEN STNS MBNR- MQN PRESENT CAKED 150 mm
CUSHION
TYPE OF SOIL GRANNULAR LAST DEEP 1998-
SCREENED ON 99(12)
HEIGHT OF 1.10
BANK
SECTIONAL 100 Kmph MAINTENANCE DETAILS
SPEED
TYPE MACHINE
TGI VALUES OF 93,109,105,79,85
SEIVE ANALYSIS LAST 5 RUNS
SEIV WEIGHT CUMM. % AGE % AGE
E RETAIN RETAINE RETAINE PASSIN
TRAFFIC DETAILS
SIZE ED (kg) D (kg) D G
(mm) AXLE LOAD 20.32tonnes
40 17 17 18.68 81.32
ANNUAL GMT 15.96
20 47 64 70.33 29.67
10 11 75 82.42 17.58
4.75 6 81 89.01 10.99 CRITERIA
< 10 91 100 0 SPEED>1 GMT> 30 FI > 30
4.75 20
FOULING INDEX F1=27.97 <35 >100 >15 >35
• The fouling of ballast will mainly depend on axle load carried,
annual GMT of traffic, type of formation and to some extent on
the commodity carried on the route.
• Maximum sectional speed has very little effect on the fouling.
Max. speed of goods train, max. axle load and annual GMT
has more pronounced effect. No definite frequency for Deep
screening can be stipulated.
• Sections with less GMT and stable formations may not require
the screening even after 10 years. However it is
recommended that deep screening in these sections should
be carried out after 10 years or when fouling index of 35 is
reached, whichever is earlier.
• Fouling index of 25 need be stipulated for sections with
annual GMT above 50 as the loss of resiliency will be at faster
pace in these sections which results increase in stresses in
rails and affects the fatigue life of rails.
SUGGEST
ED BY
RDSO
RECOMMENDE
D
• Fouling level not only to be measured but
monitored.
• Frequent Sampling through cores may not be
right strategy for monitoring as it disturbs the
ballast bed.
• There is need for assessment of condition of
ballast through non destructive techniques.
• Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is one
equipment which provides continuous, top-of-
rail measurements of sub-structure layer
conditions
• GPR- transmitting radar pulses into the sub-
structure and measuring return signals that
have reflected off boundaries between sub-
structure layers with different electromagnetic
properties.
• Principle- electromagnetic property of the
layers is the dielectric permittivity, which is a
function of the density, water content and
type of material.