6th APC Report
6th APC Report
2008
October 2009
Preface
The Assam Pay Commission, 2008 was constituted in the middle of the year
2008.The Commission is conscious of the fact that nearly eight years of the 21st
century has passed before the Pay Commission started functioning. This is an
age of rapid changes, both in technological advances as well as in expectations
of the people from the government. There has been a sea change in the very
idea of governance. Inclusive and growth oriented Legislations such as the
National Rural Employment Guarantee Act have brought in the Panchayati Raj
Institutions, Gaon Sabhas and Gaon Panchayats, as principal actors in
implementation of various developmental schemes under the Act. On the other
hand non-governmental organizations and civil society have been given
responsibility for social audit of the schemes under NREGA. Thus, the
Government, with its twin objectives of welfare and development of society, is
now exposed to much closer public scrutiny. In the private sector, after opening
up of the bulk of the economy, a new paradigm of service has come about,
redefining the concept and the term. The people, as consumers are far more
aware of their rights, and demanding of appropriate services. The Commission
takes note of all these events and the government machinery and the employees
cannot in these circumstances remain cocooned in their offices.
With the coming into force of the Assam Fiscal Responsibility and Budget
Management (AFRBM) Act and the Right To Information (RTI) Act, the
relationship between the governed and those who govern has been put on a
different platform and the expectations of stakeholders are far higher. These
areas pose major challenges which have to be met. The administrative
machinery, therefore, has to bring about a vast change in its outlook on service
delivery, and that too under stricter fiscal discipline. No doubt at the time of
recording these lines the country including this state is going through a
recessionary phase and a measure of fiscal flexibility has been found necessary
or may be so found in the near or medium term, but in the long run fiscal
discipline will have to be more stringent and service delivery cannot be
compromised on ground of financial imperatives. Thus the Commission had to
strike a balance between a suitable pay package for the employees which would
be instrumental in better service delivery and capacity of the government to
bear the additional burden arising out of the Commissions’ recommendations.
Although the Terms of Reference of the Assam Pay Commission, 2008 do not
directly require the Commission to deal with issues such as reforms in the
government and its diverse arms to transform them into modern, professional
and citizen friendly entities that are dedicated to the service of the people, the
Commission is of the view that it cannot be oblivious of such issues since
restructuring of services is one of the terms of reference. The Commission hopes
that its recommendations shall be instrumental in heralding new changes in the
business of the state.
This Pay Commission, therefore, had not only to evolve a proper pay package for
the State Government employees as the previous Commissions have done but
also to make recommendations rationalizing the governmental structure with a
view to improving the delivery mechanisms for providing better services to the
common man. The emphasis has been on making recommendations that will
enable the Government to evolve a system that primarily lays emphasis on
delivery and end results and which continuously rewards performance. It is
expected that Government will put in place a suitable mechanism for better
provision of services, the outline of which is included in the Report, incorporating
features like variable increments in the basic scheme of pay scales. Another such
innovation is the proposed scheme of running pay bands which would bring more
flexibility. The most important and overarching novel feature is that the
recommendations of the present Commission are put forward as a package, in
which revised pay scales and other benefits to State Government employees are
suggested to be implemented along with systemic changes in the existing
procedures in order to ensure the emergence of a young and dynamic
bureaucracy, with a result oriented approach.
While proposing these changes, the Commission has also kept in view the
capacity of the Government to pay and the principle that every rupee spent on
salaries, allowances, and facilities of Government employees has to translate
into a specific measure for public good. It is our belief that the Report will lead to
a realization that it is only the ultimate outcome and delivery to the last
beneficiary which will justify the huge Government edifice and the very large
amount of tax payers’ money spent on it. The Report should, therefore, not only
result in increased pay and allowances of Government employees but also prove
beneficial for all the people of our state who are waiting expectantly for much
out of this process of pay revision. Although it is true that it is the Commission
which is placing these suggestions on record, but it is not the Commission which
is saying that the pay and benefits package should result in better service to the
people; it is being said by the present times. Let all concerned remember that no
one can stop an idea whose time has come.
Introduction
Table 1
(in Rs. Crore)
Year State Tax Non-Tax Share of Grants – Total
Central Tax in –Aid Revenue
2002-03 1934.52 692.97 1814.36 2351.50 6793.34
(28.48%) (10.20%) (26.71%) (34.61%) (100%)
2003-04 2070.32 945.80 2162.07 2586.91 7765.10
(26.66%) (12.18%) (27.84%) (33.32%) (100%)
2004-05 2713.32 1070.03 2584.33 3569.59 9937.27
(27.30%) (10.77%) (26.00%) (35.93%) (100%)
2005-06 3232.21 1459.28 3056.78 4297.12 12045.39
(26.83%) (12.11%) (25.38%) (35.68%) (100%)
2006-07 3483.32 1859.27 3898.99 4425.36 13666.95
(25.49%) (13.60%) (28.53%) (32.38%) (100%)
2007-08 3359.50 2134.59 4918.21 4912.62 15324.92
(21.92%) (13.93%) (32.09%) (32.06%) (100%)
2008- 4038.53 2245.72 5791.07 11231.88 23307.21
09(R.E) (17.32%) (9.64%) (24.85%) (48.19%) (100%)
2009- 4028.25 2044.35 5546.87 11444.17 23063.64
10(BE) (17.47%) (8.86%) (24.05%) (49.62%) (100%)
Figures in brackets indicate percentage over total
Revenue.
Table 2
(in Rs.
Cr)
Components 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Interest 1403.53 1510.12 1515.67 1512.23
(13.73%) (14.33%) (13.23%) (11.86%)
Salary & 4025.85 4340.83 4798.29 5326.10
Wages (39.36%) (41.20%) (41.88%) (41.79%)
Pension 1062.39 1011.18 1177.86 1340.68
(10.38%) (9.60%) (10.28%) (10.52%)
Others 3737.38 3673.88 3964.71 4565.15
(36.53%) (34.87%) (34.61%) (35.83%)
Total 10229.15 10536.31 11456.53 12744.16
Table -3
(Rs in Crore)
Year Own Tax Non-Tax Share of Non- Other Total Non
Revenue Revenue Central Plan Non Plan
Taxes Grants Plan Revenues
under Grants
FC
2004-05 2713.32 1070.03 2584.33 136.58 320.31 6824.57
2005-06 3232.21 1459.28 3056.78 841.28 106.91 8696.46
2006-07 3483.32 1859.27 3898.99 704.56 4.14 9950.28
2007-08 3359.50 2134.59 4918.29 544.95 274.03 11231.36
Non Plan 1.2.5 It is seen from the following table that share of
Revenue salary, wages and pension in the total Non Plan
Expenditure Revenue expenditure has grown over the years and is
bound to increase further with impending pay
revision.
Table 4
(in Rs. Cr)
Components 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Interest 1403.53 1510.12 1515.67 1512.23
Salary & 4406.33 3882.63 4854.41 5068.58
Wages
Pension 1062.39 1011.48 1177.86 1340.68
Others 1335.52 2003.06 2246.09 2755.29
Total 8207.77 8407.29 9794.03 10676.77
Table 5
(Rs. in Crore)
Year Receipt Expenditure Surplus (+)
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total Deficit (-)
Account Account Account Account
1995-96 +16.16
3375.74 3316.67 6692.41 3575.76 3100.49 6676.25
1999-00 -200.65
4840.94 6119.32 10960.26 5845.67 5315.24 11160.91
2000-01 -369.68
5637.64 6742.76 12380.40 6417.11 6332.97 12750.08
2002-03 -66.03
6793.34 8501.07 15294.41 7112.50 8115.88 15228.38
2003-04 -626.35
7765.10 8778.09 16543.19 8449.79 8719.75 17169.54
2004-05 9937.27
10581.54 20518.81 10229.15 10567.11 20796.26 -277.45
(Actual).
2005-06 12045.39
3615.02 15660.41 10536.31 3749.49 14285.80 +1374.61
Actual)
2006-07 13666.95
1150.27 14817.22 11456.53 2028.33 13484.86 +1332.36
Actual)
2007-08
15324.92 1284.04 16608.96 12744.16 2406.14 15150.30 +1458.66
2008-09
23307.21 3008.00 26315.21 21421.09 5017.81 26438.90 -123.69
(R.E.)
2009-10
23063.64 3168.83 26232.47 29269.86 5716.09 34985.95 -8753.48
(B.E)
Table-6
(Rs. in Crore )
Year Expenditure on Total Revenue % of Total Total % of
Salaries, Wages Expenditure Revenue Expenditure Total
and Pension Expenditure [including on
Capital
Account]
1995-96 1939 3575.76 54.22 6676.25 29.04
2003-04 5903 8449.79 69.86 17169.54 34.38
2004-05 6188 10229.15 60.49 20796.26 29.76
2005-06 6144 10536.31 58.31 14285.80 43.00
Revenue 1.2.8 The following table reveals that General Services
Expenditure (42.23%) constitute the highest proportion of total
under different revenue expenditure of the State as per budgetary
Revenue Heads estimates for the year 2009-10.
Table 7
(Rs. in Crore)
Year General Social & Economic Grants-in-aid Total
Services Community Services & Expenditure
Services contribution
2002-03 3112.19 2898.01 1094.75 7.54 7112.50
(43.76%) (40.75%) (15.39%) (0.11%) (100%)
2003-04 3529.12 3361.49 1546.83 12.35 8449.79
(41.77%) (39.78%) (18.31%) (0.15%) (100%)
2004-05 3688.91 4262.42 2264.70 13.11 10229.14
(36.06%) (41.67%) (22.14%) (0.13%) (100%)
2006-07 4302.36 4477.48 2668.89 7.80 11456.53
(37.55%) (39.08%) (23.30%) (0.07%) (100%)
2007-08 6135.70 7687.11 3391.68 138.32 17352.81
(R.E) (35.36%) (44.30%) (19.55%) (0.80%) (100%)
2008-09 6763.15 7702.75 3830.49 1742.93 20039.32
(B.E) (33.75%) (38.44%) (19.11%) (8.70%) (100%)
2009-10 12359.47 9522.41 4690.39 2697.59 29269.86
(B.E.) (42.23%) (32.53%) (16.02%) (9.22%) (100%)
Chapter 2
Salient features 2.1.7 The revised pay structure has the following
characteristics: -
i. PB 1 pay band has 3 distinct grades represented
by 3 different grade pay.
ii. PB 2 pay band has 10 distinct grades
represented by 10 different grade pay.
iii. PB 3 pay band has 7 distinct grades represented
by 7 different grade pay.
iv. PB 4 pay band has 9 grades represented by 9
different grade pay.
v. PB 5 pay band has 1 grade represented by 1
grade pay.
vi. The total numbers of grades have been kept at
30 spread across in five distinct running bands;
additionally a Fixed Pay has been kept for the
post of Commissioner and Secretary.
vii. The ratio of minimum to maximum salary is
1:9.38 (between the start of PB 1 scale and
Fixed Pay).
viii. The rate of annual increment in all the running
pay bands is 1%. However, based on
performance as assessed by the IBOP
mechanism, up to 2% additional increment can
be earned based on performance. The details are
given in Chapter 2.2 on IBOP.
ix. The running pay bands have been given a
sufficiently long span to ensure that no employee
ordinarily stagnates at any stage in his/her
career.
x. To ensure that no stagnation takes place in any
case, it is further recommended that a person
stagnating at the maximum of any pay band for
two years shall be placed in the immediate next
higher pay band without any change in the grade
pay.
xi. Date of regular increments, in all cases, will now
be the first of July. Employees completing six
months and above in the grade as on July 1 will
be eligible.
Fixation of pay 2.1.8 The Commission has prepared a detailed fixation
in the revised chart at Annex 2.1.1 which gives the fitment in the
pay bands revised running pay bands of every stage in each of
the pre-revised pay scales. Fixation has been done in
this fixation chart in the following manner:-
(i) The basic pay drawn as on 1/1/2006 on the
existing pay scales is multiplied by a factor of
1.86 and then rounded off to next multiple of 10.
This has been taken as the pay in the revised
running pay band. If the figure derived from
multiplication of existing basic pay by factor of
1.86 is less than minimum of the pay band, the
revised pay in the pay band shall be fixed at the
minimum of the pay band.
(ii) The grade pay has been given within the limits of
what has been adopted by Government of India
with suitable modifications wherever necessary.
In some cases, the amount of grade pay has
been adjusted so as to maintain a clear
differential between successive grade pay.
(iii) The detailed fixation chart (Annex 2.1.1) showing
stage-wise fixation of existing employees in the
revised running pay bands should be utilized in
every case of fixation of pay of the concerned
employees in the revised running pay bands.
(iv) It is seen from the fixation chart that bunching is
occurring in the chart during the initial stages for
some of the pre-revised scales. This is due to the
fact that the employees at these stages will have
their salaries fixed at the minimum of the pay
band as per clause (i) above. To remove the
bunching, an ad-hoc fitment benefit at the rate
of 50% of the first increment, (rounded off to the
nearest 10), in the particular pre-revised scale
shall be given for subsequent stages till the
bunching of pay is removed.
(v) Fixation in the revised pay band and grade pay
thereon has been done with reference to the pre-
revised pay scale in which the employee was
actually drawing pay irrespective of whether
he/she has been placed in such pay scale on
appointment, regular promotion or any other
time bound promotion scheme; upgradation of
the post, etc.
(vi) Basic pay shall consist of pay in the Pay Band
and Grade Pay. It shall be inclusive of ad hoc
fitment benefit, if any, as per provision in
2.1.8(iv).
2.1.9 Fixation of pay in the revised pay bands of
existing employees shall be done in the following
manner:-
(i) In cases where employees have been placed in a
higher pay scale between 1/1/2006 and the date
of notification of the revised Pay Bands on
account of promotion, upgradation of pay scale,
etc., the employees shall be given the option to
switch over to the revised pay band and grade
pay from the date of such promotion,
upgradation, etc.
(ii) Table 2.1.1 at Annex shows stage-wise fixation
of pay of existing employees in the proposed
bands w.e.f. 1.1.2006. Subject to provisions of
(i) above, pay of employees shall be fixed
accordingly.
(iii) In case of promotion between identical posts in
the
1 80% 15% 5%
6th CPC
3.2 Recommendations of 6th Central Pay Commission
recommendations are as follows:
Category Rate
For posts in Grade Pay Rs. 600 per
of Rs. 5400/- and month
above.
Other posts Rs. 480 per
month
Daily Allowance
Current Situation 3.20 i) The present rates of Daily Allowance
given to the State Government employees is as
follows:
Hazard Allowance
Conveyance Allowance
Current Position 3.34 Conveyance Allowance is presently admissible
to various posts in different departments. The rate of
this allowance varies from Rs 40 to Rs 575 per
month. Officers whose nature of duties requires
them to undertake frequent journeys within 8 Km.
from their Headquarters for which no other
Travelling Allowance is admissible and who are
allotted Government vehicle for such journey with
the obligations to bear the fuel charges are also
given monthly conveyance allowance. 5% of basic
pay subject to a maximum of Rs.120.00 per month
is given as conveyance allowance to disabled
employees as well.
Analysis 3.35 The Commission is of the view that the better pay
package with many other higher allowances including
enhanced rates of TA/DA should adequately compensate
the daily expenses on travelling. Similarly, the Disability
Allowance recommended by this Commission will
compensate for Conveyance Allowance for disabled
employees.
Recommendatio 3.36 After careful consideration of all relevant factors, the
n Commission recommends abolition of Conveyance
Allowance for all categories of employees.
Journey on Tour
Journey by Air
Current Position 3.37 Officers in the rank of Principal Secretary/Special
Commissioner and Special Secretary/ Commissioner &
Secretary/Secretary/Additional Secretary/Joint Secretary to
the Government/Heads of Departments/Deputy
Commissioner and all Officers drawing basic pay of
Rs.10050/- are entitled to perform journey by air on tour.
Further, All India Service Officers in the Junior
Administrative Grade of pay are entitled to travel by air on
tour irrespective of their basic pay. The Chief Secretary or
officers in any post equated to secretary to the
Government of India is entitled to travel by Executive Class
of the Air lines. Officers entitled to travel by air will be
entitled to incidental expenses for the journey at the rate of
15% of the fare subject to a maximum of Rs.75.00.
Further, Government employees will be entitled to one full
Daily Allowance for the day of the journey if both the
starting point and the destination or either of them is
outside Assam and half Daily Allowance if both are within
Assam. When a Government servant travels by taxi/private
car/conveyance provided by the airlines to cover the
journey between the air port and destination/headquarters,
incidental expenses will be admissible at a flat rate of Rs
60.00 and Rs 90.00 each way for journey within and
outside Assam respectively.
Journey on Transfer
Up to Rs.1600 Rs.
600/-
Up to Rs 1600 1000 KG
APS - - Rs 130/-
Senior 3000/-
in 1st
year &
Rs
2000/-
after
every 3
years
APS - - Rs 130/-
Junior 2500/-
in 1st
year &
Rs
1500/-
after
every 3
years
Inspecto 200/- 230/- Rs 110/-
r 2500/-
in 1st
year &
Rs
600/-
after
every
year
Sub 200/- 190/- Rs 90/-
Inspecto 1200/-
r in 1st
year &
Rs
600/-
after
every
year
ASI/ 200/- 150/- - 90/70/
Havildar
Armed Free -
Branch Ration &
Cash
Allowan
ce Rs
50/
APBN Rs 75/- -
in lieu of
fresh
Ration
*Police personnel working in traffic branch get this
allowance at 50% higher rate.
Other Allowances:
a. Rifle Allowance to the Armed Branch Havildar/
Constable at the rate of Rs.20/- per month
b. Compensatory Allowance up to the rank of Inspector
at the rate of 5% of basic pay
c. Special Compensatory Allowance to various posts in
Fire Service department ranging from Rs 20/- to Rs
70/- per month
d. HRA is given to various categories ranging from Rs
400/- to Rs 700/- with an alternative to receive HRA
admissible to State Government employees
whichever is beneficial to them.
e. Commando Allowance is given to all the Police
Personnel including Class-IV service of the
Commando Battalion at the rate of 15% of basic pay
and this allowance is admissible to them only during
the period they serve in the Commando Battalion.
Analysis 3.50 During deliberations of the Commission, it was
pointed out that there will be difficulties in
discontinuance of present system of supply of free
ration, to police personnel such as in Assam Police
Battalions etc. It was also pointed out that the free
ration supply is on the basis of certain physical
quantities of food grains etc. and is cost neutral. In
consideration of this, the Commission is of the view
that present system may continue. Secondly, better
pay package coupled with performance related
increments and various other substantive allowances
should easily compensate various minor allowances
which are recommended to be discontinued.
Recommendatio 3.51 After due consideration of various relevant
n factors, the Commission recommends the
following:
i) The Present system of supply of ration may
continue and only those categories of
Police personnel who were in receipt of
ration allowance in cash would continue to
get ration allowance. Existing rates of all
the fixed allowances including ration
allowance be increased by 50%.
Jail, Home Guards and Civil Defence, Forest and Excise Department
Recommendation 3.52 The Commission recommends that all the
existing allowances to the personnel working in
Jail, Directorate of Home Guards and Civil
Defence, Forest and Excise Department shall
continue at the enhanced rates as applicable to
the corresponding posts in Police department.
These allowances shall be applicable only to the
posts which are presently eligible for various
allowances. Allowances which are recommended
to be abolished in case of Police personnel shall
also be discontinued for the personnel in above
mentioned departments.
Administrative Reforms and Training Department
Training Allowance
Technical Departments
Technical Status/Allowance
Analysis 3.55 Various associations of employees had
represented before the Commission regarding grant
of Technical Allowance and/or recognition as
Technical departments. Some individual employees
have also raised this point. On examining the issue
and as per records made available to the
Commission, it was observed that even one very old
department, traditionally in charge of civil work and
related matters, namely PWD has not been declared
the technical department! On the other hand, the
present demand, in some cases, is for declaration as
technical post even for handling a computer which
has now become an essential tool for day today
functioning for all. In essence, there is a technique
to doing everything, and all Government employees
have to perforce master these techniques in order to
discharge their duties with any degree of
competence.
Recommendation 3.56 In consideration of above mentioned factors,
the Commission finds no rationale for
declaring any department or post as technical
or for grant of any technical Allowance. The
Commission recommends abolition of all the
existing technical allowances. All posts which
carry nomenclature ‘technical’ may be suitably
redesignated.
New Allowances
Rural Service Incentive for Medical and Ayurvedic doctors
Special Pay
Current Position 3.63 Special Pay has been defined in 9(25) of the
State F.R. and S.R. as follows: “Special Pay” means
an addition of the nature of pay to the emoluments of
a post or of a Government employee, granted in
consideration of –
(a) The specially arduous nature of
duties; or
(b) Specific addition to the work or
responsibility.
“Special Pay” is also granted in lieu of allowing a
higher scale of pay.
Presently, Special Pay is admissible to 406 posts
ranging between Rs 20 to Rs 375 per month.
Analysis 3.64 A lot of discussions were held on the matter of
Special Pay both in favour and against by almost all
the earlier Pay Commissions constituted by the State
Government. But every erstwhile Pay Commission
recommended continuing the system of Special Pay as
no alternative system could be recommended to
substitute the system of special pay.
The 1988 Pay Commission has observed as follows:
“…The number of posts with Special Pay has increased
enormously over the years forming an imposing list at
the moment. It has also been noticed that in many
cases, special Pay has been granted to posts on
considerations which apparently do not have any
linkage with the fundamental criteria. In some cases,
Special Pay has been sanctioned to all posts
comprising certain categories of services although the
appropriate course in such cases should have been to
take into consideration the special arduous nature of
duties and heavier responsibilities of these posts while
formulating their pay scales.”
The Commission has further recommended that the
State Government might constitute a committee to
explore the possibility of bringing down the number of
posts carrying special pay. A committee was
constituted accordingly which identified a large
number of posts where grant of Special Pay was not at
all justified on the basis of the criteria laid down for
grant of Special Pay under FR 9(25).
Further, 1994 Pay Commission observed that, “….For
discharge of normal duties and responsibilities
attached to a post, there is no justification for grant of
Special Pay; But this approach has not been always
adhered to in the past, resulting in haphazard growth
of Special Pay posts. In principle, we are not in favour
of Special Pay to a post where there is no adequate
justification in terms of criteria laid down under FR
9(25)…..”
The pay scale of a post is normally determined after
taking into account all the related aspects such as
educational qualification, mode of recruitment,
promotion avenues, duties and responsibilities of the
post etc. The Special Pay therefore should not
ordinarily be a permanent feature. This commission is
of view that in the light of the changed circumstances
where on the one hand, there is considerable upward
revision of the pay structure, and on the other hand,
the special nature of Special Pay losing its
significance, no Special Pay needs to be attached to
any post under the State Government. The
Commission has separately recommended an
improved package of emoluments including Grade
Pay which is expected to take care of situations for
which Special Pay is granted now. Therefore, the
Commission finds no rationale in continuing Special
Pay for any post.
Recommendation 3.65 The Commission recommends abolition of
Special Pay for all categories of posts.
Chapter 3.1
6th CPC 3.1.2 The 6th Central Pay Commission has considered
Recommendations benefits to the women employees of the Central
Government in following manner.
On Additional Quantum of
attaining Pension
age of
75 Years 15% of basic pension
80 Years 25% of basic pension
85 Years 30% of basic pension
90 Years 40% of basic pension
95 Years 50 % of basic pension
100 Years 100 % of basic pension
On Additional Quantum of
attaining Pension
age of
75 Years 15% of basic pension
80 Years 25% of basic pension
85 Years 30% of basic pension
90 Years 40% of basic pension
95 Years 50 % of basic pension
100 Years 100 % of basic pension
4. Gratuity:
5. Commutation of pension:
6. Ex Gratia:
9. Age of Superannuation:
Chapter 6
Current Position 6.1 Presently, holidays and office timings of the State
Government offices are as follows:
Position in Central
6.2 Prior to recommendations of the 6th Central Pay
Government prior
Commission, the position in Government of India was as
to 6th CPC
follows:
recommendations
i) 17 closed days in a year including 3 National
holidays & 14 Gazetted holidays.
6th CPC
6.3 The 6th Central Pay Commission considered all the
recommendations
relevant factors and recommended as follows:
Demands
6.4 It is noteworthy that many employees’ associations
have stressed the need to reduce the number of holidays
and introducing 5 working days week in view of its
increasing the quality of service delivery and customer
satisfaction.
a. Government of India:
b. Government of Assam:
Recommendations
6.6 After considering all the relevant factors, the
Commission recommends the following:
Chapter 7
Reorganisation of Services
Levels for all 7.1 It is observed that the Assam Pay
Heads of Commission, 1979, recommended the rationalization
Departments of the pay scales of different Heads of Departments
and their categorisation by grouping them into three
levels based on the importance of each Directorate
on the basis of its position in general administration
of the State, its importance for providing services to
the public, the total budgetary transaction, the total
number of employees and such other relevant
factors.
7.2 The APC 1988 in their turn rationalized the
pay scales of all posts from the level of Assistant
Director to the level of Director.
7.3 The APC 1994 recommended the
corresponding revised pay scales for all the
administrative posts from the level of Assistant
Director to the Director under three levels namely
Level I, II and III and the continuance of the
classification of Heads of Departments in three
levels which was mentioned in ROP Rules 1998.
Introduction 7.15 The Assam Civil Service is the premier civil service
in the State. This service has contributed significantly to
the establishment of an effective administration in the
state. ACS officers occupy posts such as EACs, Circle
Officers, SDO, DC etc. at the cutting edge level and also
discharge duties in various posts ranging from Deputy
Secretary up to Commissioner and Secretary in the
Secretariat with crucial roles in policy formulation and
implementation. But over a period of time, due to
various factors, the stature, dignity and leading role of
ACS has been seen to be diluted in recent times. The
Commission is of the view that it is important to address
the situation in a forward looking manner and ensure
that the state and the people get the benefit of a premier
generalist service which is a sine qua non for growth and
development of the state. In this context, the
Commission recommends creation of a new civil service
which may be named as ‘Assam Administrative Service’
(hereafter referred as AAS). The Commission is
suggesting the following concept note on the new Service
for examination by the Government.
Service Rules and 8.9 The Commission is of the view that it is important
related issues to ensure effective implementation of well established
systems and procedures which are not only time tasted
but also have strengthened the administration over the
years. In this regard, the Commission recommends
the following:
Application Forms 8.21 The Standard Application form for application for
Government posts is found to be inconvenient. The
Commission recommends that the form be changed
into a more elaborate form incorporating more
information about the applicant. A new form is
given at Annex 8.1 that may be used with
immediate effect.
General recommendations
10. All recruitments for all posts must be made through statutory
commissions set up for the purpose and appropriately
constituted.
The Officers and Servants of the Gauhati High Court (Principal Seat)
The Commission has not been presented any material justifying any disturbance
to the existing parity of pay/ allowances of equivalent post in the High Court and
the Secretariat.
Agriculture Department
The Commission noted that under the Directorate of Agriculture, there are
eight levels in the officers’ cadre whereas in other similar Directorates,
the levels are generally six. The organisational structure of the
Directorate is rather skewed. While there are a large number of vacancies
in the higher echelons, there is stagnation at the lower levels.
The Commission recommends that the Directorate of Agriculture
be reorganized and the levels of cadres be reduced to six from the
present eight. The Commission recommends that the posts of Sr.
ADO and Assistant Director of Agriculture (ADA) be abolished. It
may be mentioned that the post of Assistant Director is not there in
Directorates like the Medical and Health Directorate, Soil Conservation
Directorate or the four Works Directorates.
The Commission recommends that all the existing Sr. ADOs be
upgraded to Sub Divisional Agriculture Officer level. The
Commission was informed that about 100 Sr. ADOs have already been
upgraded to SDAO level.
The Commission also recommends that the posts of ADAs be abolished. It
is also observed that almost 100% posts of ADAs are vacant at present.
In case there are any ADAs in place in the Directorate, they may
be retained in their personal capacities till they can be promoted
as DDAs.
Similarly, in view of the renewed emphasis on agriculture and introduction
of new schemes, the Commission is of the opinion that there is need for
creation of smaller agriculture circles. This would also ensure better
monitoring of various agriculture development projects at ADO level.
Almost 50% of the DDA posts appear to be vacant at present because as
per the current Service Rules, there are not enough eligible candidates to
fill up the vacant posts. It is recommended that the vacant DDA
posts be filled up immediately, from the SDAOs and Sr. ADOs as a
onetime measure.
The Commission recommends that in future recruitment in the
Directorate should be only at the ADO level. The earlier practice of
direct entry at Assistant Director level be discontinued. The Commission
noted that the last direct recruitment of Assistant Director took place way
back in 1980s.
In case of the Agriculture Statistics Posts the Commission recommends as
follows:
The Commission has earlier recommended that the Statistical
functions in various Government departments be performed by
the professional cadre of officers belonging to the Assam and
Economics Service (ASES) only. Hence all officers from the level of
Inspector of Statistics upwards should be manned by officers
belonging to the central pool of Assam Statistical and Economics
Service only. While the existing officers of the wing in the level of
Inspector and above will continue in their existing posts and
maintain their departmental seniority, on their retirement, their
vacancies will be filled by officers from the ASES only.
Direct entry into this wing in future should be only at the Field
Assistant level. Post of Inspector of Statistics/ equivalent posts
be filled up by promotion from subordinate statistical posts to the
maximum extent of 30%. The entry qualification should be either
graduation with mathematics or requisite professional
qualification from a recognised technical/professional/vocational
institute requiring minimum three years of study after
matriculation.
Regarding the narrow salary difference between SAS-III and SAS-II, the
Commission is of the opinion that the Grade Pay System would take care
of the same.
The group of Research Assistants of the Department made a
representation to the Commission in which they stated that twenty three
of them were recruited in the late 1970s as non-cadre officers to
implement a World Bank scheme. Twenty one of them now still serves in
the Agriculture Directorate in the pay scale of Rs. 4120-9750. All are
stagnating in the top of their scale. Being non-cadre, they had no
promotion prospect. The last Pay Commission encadred them with
Agricultural Inspectors, but they did not get any benefit in terms of pay or
career progression. The Commission recommends placing the post
of Research Assistant in Pay Band 3 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4700.
The Commission is of the view that in future no such recruitments should
be made where the posts are temporary in nature and meant for specific
projects or schemes which may be for a finite period only.
Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Department
Issues
Recommendations
1. The new system of running Pay Bands and Grade Pay will provide
increased benefit to the employees in posts of VFA and allied
services. In order to enable these employees to keep up with the
developments in the field of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, the
entry qualification should be Higher Secondary.
Issues
Recommendation
Cooperation Department
In a rural oriented economy like ours with high population density,
Cooperation Department is ideally suited to drive the development
process of the state. As a follow up of the Report submitted by the Prof.
Vaidyanathan Committee, it appears that the co-operative movement has
received a fillip in recent times. It is now expected that the department
would be in a position to revitalize, strengthen and develop the Co-
operative movement in the state.
The Commission has already recommended upgradation of this
Directorate, which would take care of the pay scale variations of the
various officers of the Department.
Inspectors and Auditors of the department have demanded pay parity
with auditors of other departments. After consideration of all the relevant
factors, the Commission recommends that the post of Junior
Inspector/ Junior Auditor be placed in Pay Band 2 with Grade Pay
of Rs. 2800 and the post of Senior Inspector/ Senior Auditor be
placed in Pay Band 3 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4500. It will also be
necessary for the auditors to submit half yearly reports of work
done by them and action taken on their reports to the registrars of
Cooperative societies.
Fixed TA is recommended for the Auditors and Inspectors of the
department.
The suggestion for creation of additional posts, including that of Principal
of the Training College at Joysagar is left to the department to initiate
after thorough work assessment, manpower requirement and the financial
implications.
Department of Cultural Affairs
The ambit of the Department of Cultural Affairs has grown substantially
with the Directorates of Museum, Archaeology and Historical and
Antiquarian Studies being brought under its purview along with Library
Services.
The Commission has recommended upgradation of this department which
will address most of the issues raised in the individual representations.
Culture
Individual memorandum is received from Shri N. Deka and others from
the Teachers’ Unit, Government College of Arts and Crafts. The
Commission was informed that the College was upgraded as a
Government College of Art and Crafts on 18th August 1990. The
Commission, therefore, recommends that the teachers of the
Collage be given pay on par with the Government College of Music.
The following pay structure is recommended for their teaching staff:
Designations Pay Grade Pay
Band
Principal 4 Rs. 6300
Lecturers 4 Rs. 5900
Demonstrators 3 Rs. 4300
Typists
Issues
The major issues in respect of the Assam Secretariat Typists' Association are as
follows:
1. Higher pay scale for Senior Grade Typists. At present Senior Grade typists
are in the scale of Rs. 3850- 7350. Typists are in the scale of Rs. 3010-
6075. For attaining various Speed levels in typing, typists get benefits of
increment.
Recommendation
1. Typists and Sr. Typists will get the benefit of new system of
running Pay Bands wherein they are not likely to face stagnation.
Issues
The major issues raised by the All Assam Government Drivers' and Handimens'
Association are as follows:
2. Conveyance Allowance.
Recommendation
Class IV
Issues
The Commission heard the representatives of three associations of Class IV
employees. The main issues arising out of the hearings are as follows:
Recommendation
Education Department
Education is fundamental to the growth and development of any society
and the base on which entire society stands. The Commission, therefore,
felt it necessary to examine the Education Department of the State
Government thoroughly and noted that the largest number of
representations was received from various group of employees belonging
to the Education department.
Today, Education is being recognised as a fundamental right. The
Government has undertaken numerous schemes to vigorously pursue the
educational objectives of the nation. The state of Assam does not figure
very highly in terms of various educational indices. Literacy levels
continue to be low; school dropout rates are very high. It is also being
stated in various quarters that most of our educated youth are also
‘unemployables’. Assam has one of the highest rates of educated
unemployed in the country.
The Commission recognises that the teachers are the mainstays of
education. Highly ambitious educational developmental schemes may be
drawn up, but it is the quality of teachers that would ultimately determine
the quality of education being imparted. How the future generations will
turn out would be entirely dependent on the quality, motivation and level
of competence of today’s teachers. It is imperative that our teachers
should not only be adequately educated, but also trained to discharge the
challenging responsibility they are required to shoulder. The Commission
is conscious of the fact that teachers comprise the largest group of
Government employees. Taking cognizance of the fact that it is teachers
who would determine the destiny of our society, the Commission felt it
imperative to consider the case of the teachers in greater depth.
The Commission notes that a large number of teachers in the schools of
Assam are undergraduates, especially at the primary levels. The
Commission believes that even to teach at the primary level is a challenge
by itself. The formative years of a child are spent at the Primary School
level and the education the child receives at this stage basically
determines how the child is going to develop in future. Thus the teacher
at the primary level requires adequate maturity and skill to understand
the requirements of a child and develop the child accordingly. The
Commission feels that a Higher Secondary passed youth may not be
mature enough to mould the young school children in a proper manner.
Further, the Commission also believes that teaching requires certain skills
on part of a teacher without which the teacher cannot be effective. Thus,
teacher training is an important component in the development of a
teacher. The scope and level of training that can be imparted to a Higher
Secondary passed youth would be limited. This would also inhibit scope of
future training for these youth as they progress in their lives, when the
requirements, demands and challenges of education are also expected to
undergo change in a dynamic world. During deliberations, it was pointed
out that introduction of graduation as the entry qualification for the
recruitment of primary school teachers is fraught with certain difficulties.
This was deliberated upon in detail.
Accordingly, the Commission recommends that in future ALL school
teachers must have minimum graduation as the required
educational qualification, to be followed by formally recognised
and approved training in teaching or a formal Bachelor level
Degree in Education/Teaching. The Commission recommends that
all the school teachers, who are undergraduates, would continue
to draw their current salary and be fixed in the corresponding Pay
Band and Grade Pay till they acquire a Graduation Degree and
undergo the requisite teacher training. Their pay will be treated as
Terminal Pay since the future incumbents to their posts would be
graduates. Even in case of Art and Crafts Teachers, the
Commission recommends that in future they must be graduates
and they must have formal training in teaching.
For the non-graduate teachers in the Government, the Commission
recommends the following:
One of the ways conceived by the Government to spread education and
make education available to those who are already in employment or are
located in remote and distant areas is by encouraging the distant mode of
learning. Apart from IGNOU and the KK Handique Open University, a large
number of Universities have set up distant education centres, making
higher education available to one and all. Therefore, the Commission
recommends that all non graduate teachers, who are below the
age of 45, need to complete their graduation through the distant
or any other mode and undergo training before becoming eligible
to the higher Grade Pay proposed for them.
Since the Commission believes that training is very vital for teachers, it is
recommended that the Government draws up a comprehensive
training programme of appropriate content and duration and
ensures that all untrained teachers are made to go through the
training process accordingly. To make training meaningful, it is
necessary that there is adequate evaluation after the training process and
only those who attain minimum qualifying standard in the evaluation
process should be deemed to have been trained to become eligible for the
new scales. All teachers who are already graduates must go through this
training programme successfully before being eligible for the new scale
proposed.
Those undergraduate teachers above the age of 45 years would be eligible
for Grade pay of Rs. 2300 only after successfully undergoing the laid down
training process. Thus, it would be imperative not only to draw up the
training programme immediately, but also to draw up training schedule
giving adequate priority to the older teachers to be trained first.
The undergraduate teachers without graduation and training will be fitted
in the new pay scheme based on their existing pay scales. Those who
would not complete their graduation or undergo the requisite training
would continue to draw pay in the new scheme corresponding to their
existing pay till they retire. Their pay would be treated as a terminal scale
of pay.
Craft Teachers, both Matric and undermatric above the age of 45 years,
will also get Grade Pay of Rs. 2300 in Pay Band 2, after undergoing
training.
The Commission further recommends that the teachers who
already have a formal qualification in Education, like B. Ed. Or B.T.
will be exempted from undergoing the above training process. The
Commission further recommends that in future teachers who have
B.T. / B.Ed. qualification that can be acquired after one year of
studies be given one advance increment while those who have
acquired the same qualification that requires two years be given
two advance increments subject to detail guidelines in respect of
grant of Advance Increment in Chapter 3.2.
The Commission also recommends the abolition of the posts of
Subject Teachers/Elective Subject Teachers in Higher Secondary
Schools. The Commission recommends that ALL teachers with
Post Graduate Qualifications must teach their own subjects as
well as allied subjects, not only in Class XI and XII, but also in
other classes of the School, just like any other full-time teachers,
to be eligible to draw the grade pay recommended for them.
The Commission recommends the following pay structure for school
teachers in the revised scheme:
Category Recommended Pay Structure
(*) The existing Headmasters of ME/MV and High schools will get an
additional increment at the time of fixation of revised pay. Teachers shall
get an additional increment on being appointed to the aforesaid posts in
future.
In respect of the present teachers below age of 45 and who are
undergraduate/ untrained and undergraduate teachers above the
age of 45 who have not yet successfully completed training, the
following Terminal Pay shall be applicable:
Category PB Grade
Pay
The Commission recommends that Service Rules for Teachers, where they
are in existence, be reviewed from their practicality and relevance point of
view. In case Service Rules are absent in some categories, they should be
framed in a time-bound manner.
The Commission has allowed Leave accumulation and leave
encashment benefit for all categories of teachers up to 150 days.
The Commission has recommended a special dispensation to the teachers
recognizing their role in moulding the future generations of the society.
While the ultimate results of what a teacher delivers would be felt only in
the long run, systems have to be put in place now and followed
consistently to ensure the likelihood of the desired outcome. In this
connection, during the deliberations of Commission, it emerged that non-
holding of classes regularly is a common phenomenon in educational
institutions. The Heads of Institutions are to ensure that all teachers take
classes as per the laid down time table on all working days. The academic
calendar should be strictly followed. It also came to the notice of the
Commission that classes are often not held as examinations, in-house or
public, are held in the classrooms. This is not a new phenomenon. The
Commission recommends that a solution to this problem be found so that
classes are not suspended due to extraneous reasons. If necessary, the
question of construction of separate halls for holding examinations may
be considered. The cost of investment made in such constructions would
be offset by the tremendous gain in the matter of holding of classes
regularly and consequent benefit to the students.
The Commission recommends that school teachers, if they meet
the eligibility criteria, be allowed to apply for posts like S.I. /
Education Officers etc.
The Commission recommends that the Principal of the Hindi
Teachers’ Training College be put in Pay Band 4 with grade pay of
Rs. 6300. The Commission recommends the Lecturers be placed in
Pay Band 4 with Grade Pay of Rs. 5900.
The Commission notes the need to preserve our heritage and the
importance of classical languages and recommends that all teachers
of the Sanskrit and Pali/Prakit Institutes be placed in Pay Band 2
with Grade Pay of Rs. 2800. In addition, the Commission
recommends that the Pradhan Adhyapak of these Institutes be
placed in Pay Band 3 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4200.
In case of the Basic Training Centres and Normal Schools, the
Commission recommends that all the instructors who are
graduates and have formal training, and who are in pay scales
whose maximum is Rs. 8750 or less, be placed in Pay Band 2 with
Grade Pay of Rs. 2800. The Commission also recommends that the
Principals of Basic Training Centre be placed in Pay Band 4 with
grade pay of Rs. 5900.
The Commission also recommends that the Department may review the
designations of posts like Computor, etc. and may redesignate the same if
felt necessary.
The Committee recommends that the Librarians in SCERT and
DIET, if they have Graduate Qualifications in Library Science, be
placed in Pay Band 2 with grade pay of Rs. 2800. The new system of
Pay Bands would take care of their stagnations.
The State Government should identify special degree/ training
courses for teachers of the Blind Schools and Deaf and Dumb
Schools. The Commission recommends that the teachers and the
Head Master of the Blind Schools and Deaf and Dumb School who
have undergone such courses, be given 20% of their basic pay as
Special Teaching allowance.
The Commission recommends Fixed TA for the Adult Education
Supervisors.
Many teachers of various Government Colleges approached the
Commission requesting UGC or equivalent pay scales. The Commission is
of the opinion that it is for the Government to decide whether to give UGC
pay scales or not and hence the Commission has not given any opinion on
any such requests.
The Commission recommends that the Unit Leaders of Scouts & Guides,
who are otherwise regular teachers of schools, be given an additional
increment for the additional duties they perform as Scouts and Guide Unit
Leaders.
Ms. Indusmati Narzary, the EMO of the Elementary Education Department
represented before the Commission about the enhancement of her post.
The posts of Evaluation & Monitoring Officer (EMO) and Planning Officer
(PO) in the erstwhile Education (Development) Department were created
in March 1982 in the same scale. However in the Revision of Pay Rules of
1990 and 1998, the EMO post was omitted, probably due to there being
no incumbent. The Commission recommends placing post of EMO in
the same Pay Band and Grade pay as that of the PO, i.e. Pay Band
4 and Grade Pay of Rs. 5900.
Shri Kulen Das, Physical Instructor of Cotton College, who is in the scale
of Rs. 3490-8100, represented to the Commission seeking enhancement
of his salary scale to be at par with others higher salary. The
Commission recommends that post of Physical Instructor be
placed in Pay Band 2 with Grade Pay of Rs. 2800. The Commission
further recommends that the authorities examine the future possibility of
filling up such posts from the common cadre of Physical Education
Instructors of the Sports & Youth Development Department.
Shri Kamal Kumar Goswami, Laboratory Technician, Department of
Botany, Cotton College is working as Laboratory Technician since 1983
has sought time scale promotion, which shall be taken care of by new
system of running Pay Bands as recommended by the Commission.
Shri Apurba Kumar Das and Shri Ashok Sharma, Technical Operators in
the Assam Engineering College have joined in 1986 after graduating in
Engineering and having Post Graduate Diploma in Computer Applications.
It seems that their counterpart posts in the Jorhat Engineering College
have been abolished. The Commission has recommended the new
system of Pay Bands which would mitigate their career progression issue.
Regarding their possible absorption as faculty members, the Commission
would like the College authorities to examine the same, based on their
qualification and eligibility. Their fitment in corresponding pay band and
grade pay should be treated as terminal pay.
Individual memorandum is received from Shri Ajit Chandra Baruah,
Production Officer, Directorate of Madrassa Education asking for higher
pay scale. He shall get benefit of new system of Pay Band.
Excise Department
Issues
Recommendation
Forest Department
The Commission notes that forests are one of the most important assets
of the state of Assam. The preservation, conservation and protection of
the forests of the state have very critical long term bearings on the state’s
survival and growth. Therefore, the Commission felt it imperative to
examine the department in depth within the time constraints.
The Commission also observed that at the frontline level, there are a
number of posts where the job content variation may be minimal. For
example, apart from Forest Guard, there are posts like Patrolling Guard,
Depot Guard, Anti-poaching guard, Gate Keeper etc which may be
interchangeable. At this level, posts should be multi-functional so that
work exigency related redeployment, reallocation of duties etc. becomes
easy. In addition there are many posts whose relevance and need for
continuance need to be examined. In the Assam Junior Forest Service
Rules, notified as recently as in January 2006, the Department carries
posts like Lady Welfare officers, Forest Village School Teachers, PT
instructors, cinema operator, saw mill personnel, Barber, Water Carrier
and many such posts. Similarly, it seems that there are many posts in the
department with provisions for direct entry, which are isolated jobs. Posts
like Research Officers, Surveyors, and Radio Mechanic etc. appear to
operate in isolation in the Department with no scope of promotion or
development.
Recommendations:
Finance Department
Issues
Recommendation
After considering all relevant factors, the Commission recommends as
follows:
1. The Commission has separately recommended minimum
qualification of Graduation with computer education for all
ministerial staff which also includes JAA of Treasury.
Issues
The main issue relating to this department is provision of uniforms for Inspectors
and Sub-inspectors of Supply.
Recommendation
After considering the relevant factors, the Commission recommends that the
department may provide uniforms for Inspectors and Sub Inspectors if
required by the laws these employees are meant to implement.
Fisheries Department
Issues
Recommendations
Issues
2. Two Senior Lokakanyas of Ganasewa Bhavan, S/Smt. Mini Lahon Bora and
Guna Saikia Gogoi appeared before the Commission and placed following
problems and demands before the Commission.
Recommendations
The Handloom and Textile Department is another department that has the
potential to play the role of initiator of growth in the economy of the state.
Both the wings, Handloom and textile, are involved with the processes
used in the making of cloth, a basic human need. However, while
handloom is more in the nature of cottage industry, textile is industrial in
nature. Therefore, the two wings of the Directorate, Handloom and Textile
are rather dichotomous.
Shri Mustafa Ali Ahmed, Statistical Officer in the Handloom and Textile
Directorate also made a representation to the Commission seeking
upgradation of his pay. In this regard, the Commission decided to adhere
to the general guidelines about the Statistical Officers appointed in various
Departments.
Sericulture Directorate
The Commission also noted that the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) has
been implemented with vigour all over the state. A large number of
appointments have been also made under the scheme. The Commission
however, observes that the NRHM is a mission which would end some day or
other. The systems and the infrastructure created under the mission would have
to be sustained once the Mission is over. The Health & Family Welfare
Department must ensure that it has the appropriate manpower and resources
available for the same in perpetuity.
The Ayurvedic and Homeopathic Doctors Associations asked for same pay scales
and status as that of the Allopathic Doctors in the Department. They stated that
their courses, in terms of duration and internship thereafter, were identical to
those required for Allopathic doctors. They also cited instances of various states
in the country, where the Homeopathic and Ayurvedic doctors are in the same
pay scales as that of Allopathic Doctors.
The Graduate Nurses had represented to the Commission that they go through a
formal professional course after Higher Secondary where the entry qualifications
are as rigorous as that of other professional courses. Hence they should get
higher pay. The Commission noted that the Graduate Nurses are being appointed
as Staff Nurses along with GNM, and do the same job, apart from those given
teaching responsibilities. The Director of State Health Service stated that in the
State Health Service, there is no provision for separate posts for Graduate
Nurses.
The representatives of nurses requested the Commission for better pay scales in
view of the type of service rendered by them. They claimed that theirs is a noble
profession and often the impression of the general public about health services
provided by the Government is developed through the nurses. They also
mentioned about the arduous nature of their work.
The Commission was informed by the Department that the entry qualification for
the post of Drug Inspector is B. Pharm or Degree in Medicine with specialisation
in clinical Pharmacology or Micro Biology. This is an anomalous condition. The
Degree in Medicine does not exist and in actual practice it has been replaced by
MBBS qualification. Whether the two qualifications can be treated as equal is to
be examined by competent authorities. The exact qualification required for the
post should be clearly determined by the department before the question of
equalizing the pay of Drug Inspectors with that of Medical Officers can be
considered.
The Commission noted that in the State Leprosy Organisation, there are many
posts that have become redundant, consequent to the development and change
in approach towards the treatment of leprosy. There is an urgent need to review
the various posts that still exist in the department and rationalisation of the
structure must be undertaken immediately.
Shri Kiran Bhuyan, Library Assistant in the Gauhati Medical College Hospital has
requested for higher pay scale and for being redesignated as Deputy Librarian.
6. Those Nurses (both male and female), who are currently in the
pay scales of Rs. 3370-7100 be placed in Pay Band 2 with Grade
Pay of Rs. 2500.
8. The following staff of the Malaria Wing of the Health and Family
Welfare Department be placed in Pay Band 2 with Grade Pay as
follows:
Post Grade
Pay (Rs)
SI/BHI 2100
(Graduate)
SMI 2200
9. The District Malaria Officer be placed in Pay Band 3 and Grade Pay
of Rs. 4500.
14. The Commission notes that Service Rules do not exist for many of
the employees in the Department. The Commission recommends
that the Department takes up the issue of finalization of
Departmental Service Rules on a war footing.
Home Department
Issues
It has been placed before the Commission that the personnel of the Police
department are at the cutting edge of maintenance of security and law and order
in the state. It has been stated that policemen have to face the bullets of the
militants as a daily part of their duties. Moreover, it was pointed out that Assam
Police personnel have to increasingly carry out their duties in cooperation with
Central Police Forces and the Army and their pay and allowances should be
comparable to those of the CRP. In this background, following are the main
issues raised by employees of the Home Department:
1. Higher pay scales for APS Junior and other police personnel as per 6th CPC
recommendations.
3. Special Allowance for police personnel working in Hill districts and BTAD
areas.
6. Parity in pay and allowances for Craft Instructors in Jails with that of
Assistant Instructors of ITI.
8. Parity in pay and allowances of Civil Defence and Home Guards personnel
with that of police personnel.
10. Service conditions of Home Guards who are not Government employees
and are on fixed pay.
Recommendation
Issues
Recommendation
After considering all relevant factors, the Commission makes the following
recommendations:
1. The post of Junior Scientific Officer and Scientific Officer be
amalgamated and redesignated as Scientific Officer and placed in
PB 4 with Grade Pay of Rs. 5400.
Issues
Recommendations
After considering all relevant factors, the Commission makes the following
recommendations:
Issues
Recommendations
After considering all the relevant factors, the Commission recommends as
follows:
The economic growth of a state depends to a large extent on the level of its
industrial development. From this point of view, the Industries & Commerce
Department (ICD) should be a major engine of economic growth of the state.
The Commission is of the view that the ICD, as it is organised at present,
requires a thorough and realistic review of its organisation structure and
manpower deployment. The Commission suggests that such a review must be
undertaken immediately.
The nature of most of the work in the department has professional bearing.
Therefore it is desirable that the department at the delivery level is manned
mostly by qualified professionals. The Commission noted that the Extension
Officers of the Department can be of three types: Those with Diploma in
Engineering, those who are graduates and also there is provision for promotion
from the Ministerial staff. The Commission recommends that all Extension
Officers be direct recruits with Diploma in Engineering. Similarly, there
should be provision for 50% direct recruitment in the Assistant Manager
cadre for Engineering Graduates. Furthermore, the officers need to be
properly trained and oriented so that they envisage their roles as that of
facilitators of growth and not as disburser of grants. These officers
should be Extension Officers in the real sense of the term.
The Commission notes that the ICD has a Cottage Industries Training Institute
(CITI) and a few Training cum Production Centres (TCPC) which are virtually
defunct. The Commission believes that trying to revive these moribund
institutions would virtually amount to throwing good money after bad. The
Government may examine the question of closing down these institutes, the
staff redeployed and the infrastructure put to alternative uses.
There is need for a thorough review of the Department’s manpower needs and
the utility of some of posts that may have limited relevance in the current
context. The Department has two wings: Technical and Non-technical. It is seen
that officers with similar designations, but belonging to different wings are in
different scales of Pay. e.g. the Extension Officer (Technical) is in the scale of Rs.
3580-8750 while the Extension Officer (Non-technical) is in the scale of Rs.
3490-8100. The Mill Wright Fitter, which appears to be a job of technical nature,
is shown in the Department as belonging to the non-technical cadre. Therefore,
the need of a thorough review is very urgent.
Judicial Department
Legislature Department
Issues
Labour Department
Issues
1. One pay scale for all categories of Instructors of vocational trades and that
should be on par with Higher Secondary subject teachers.
Recommendation
3. Shri Saikia shall get benefit of new system of running Pay Band
wherein he shall not face stagnation. Government may consider
promotion of the present incumbent to the post of Employment
Officer, if eligible, provided this post is not filled up in future.
4. Shri. Deka shall get benefit of new system of running Pay Band
wherein he shall not face stagnation.
Labour Commissioner
Issues
Recommendations
Personnel Department
Issues
The following are the main issues relating to Assam Civil Service:
1. The Assam Civil Service is the premier civil service of the state. This service
has contributed significantly to the establishment of an effective
administration in the state. ACS officers occupy posts such as EACs, Circle
Officers, SDO, DC etc. at the cutting edge level and also discharge duties in
various posts ranging from Deputy Secretary up to Commissioner and
Secretary in the Secretariat with crucial roles in policy formulation and
implementation. But it has been observed that over time, due to various
factors, the stature, dignity and leading role of ACS has been seen to be
diluted in recent times. The members of the ACS appearing before the
Commission urged that in the interest smooth administration of Assam,
consideration of this situation is urgently necessary. It was also pointed out
that the ACS is one of the most poorly paid state civil services in the
country. Therefore, they requested for special consideration regarding pay
of ACS officers.
Recommendation
After considering all relevant factors, the Commission makes the following
recommendation:
1. In view of the nature of service and premier status of ACS, the pay
in the running Pay band PB 4 for ACS Junior Grade at the entry
level will start from Rs. 12500 with the Grade Pay of Rs 5400.
Similarly, the revised pay in the running Pay band PB 4 for ACS
Junior Grade shall be fixed at Rs 12500 instead of Rs 12000 in the
fitment table-21. The Ad hoc fitment benefit as per 2.1.8 (iv) shall
be given thereafter to remove the bunching if any. The revised pay
of ACS officers shall be as follows:
Sl. No. Basic Pay in Revised pay in Grade Pay Total Pay Total Pay With
the pre- the running pay Adhoc Fitment
revised scale band [See 2.1.8
(iv)]
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs)
1 4390 12500 5400 17900 17900
2 4480 12500 5400 17900 17950
3 4600 12500 5400 17900 18000
4 4720 12500 5400 17900 18050
5 4840 12500 5400 17900 18100
6 4960 12500 5400 17900 18150
7 5080 12500 5400 17900 18200
8 5200 12500 5400 17900 18250
9 5375 12500 5400 17900 18300
10 5550 12500 5400 17900 18350
11 5725 12500 5400 17900 18400
12 5900 12500 5400 17900 18450
13 6075 12500 5400 17900 18500
14 6250 12500 5400 17900 18550
15 6425 12500 5400 17900 18600
16 6600 12500 5400 17900 18650
17 6850 12750 5400 18150 18700
18 7100 13210 5400 18610 18750
19 7350 13680 5400 19080 19080
20 7600 14140 5400 19540 19540
21 7850 14610 5400 20010 20010
22 8100 15070 5400 20470 20470
23 8425 15680 5400 21080 21080
24 8750 16280 5400 21680 21680
25 9075 16880 5400 22280 22280
26 9400 17490 5400 22890 22890
27 9725 18090 5400 23490 23490
28 10050 18700 5400 24100 24100
29 10375 19300 5400 24700 24700
30 10700 19910 5400 25310 25310
31 11025 20510 5400 25910 25910
32 11425 21260 5400 26660 26660
33 11825 22000 5400 27400 27400
SI-I 12225 22740 5400 28140 28140
SI-II 12625 23490 5400 28890 28890
SI-III 13025 24230 5400 29630 29630
Issues
Recommendation
1. The employee will get benefit under new system of Pay Bands.
2. The Government may consider merger of different posts and
redesignating them appropriately.
Issues
The main issues raised by the employees of the department are as follows:
Recommendations
After considering all the relevant factors, the Commission recommends the
following:
Issues
The main issues raised by the employees of the department are as follows:
Recommendation
After considering all the relevant factors, the Commission recommends the
following:
Issues
2. One year training of Land Revenue manual with basic computer training.
Recommendation
After considering all relevant factors, the Commission recommends as
follows:
The following are the main issues relating to various cadres under the
Secretariat Administration Department. There is some overlap with certain
cadres of General Administration Department.
Ministerial Staff
No separate memorandum was received from the ministerial staff of the State
Secretariat. The issues relating to ministerial staff of the State Secretariat were
part of the representations to the Commission by bodies such as Sadou Asom
Karmachari Parishad and Assam State Employees Federation. The main demands
related to adoption of the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission
for enhancement of pay scales, along with allowances, benefits such as Leave
Travel Concession, HRA etc., many of which are of general nature. In respect of
employees of the State Secretariat, it is observed that the position of the Senior
and Junior Administrative Assistants are in the Pay Scale of Rs.3760-9400 and
Rs. 3490-8100 respectively. It is observed that in both the above mentioned
cases, the pay scales of the State Secretariat employees are higher than the pay
scales of the equivalent cadres of Ministries of Government of India.
Stenographers
Sports and other co-curricular activities have a crucial role to play in the
development of the youth potential of the nation and there is a need for a
concerted and well planned effort directed towards the same. It was noted that
most of the representations to the Commission from the employees of this
directorate were from those who were in isolated posts with little scope for
career advancement. The running Pay Bands suggested by the Commission
would take care of this aspect.
The Commission noted that the Directorate has a large number of Physical
Education instructors who are attached to High and Higher secondary Schools to
impart physical education. The Commission regards Physical Education as a vital
part of the education process. The Physical Instructors demanded higher pay
scale and Kit Maintenance Allowance as the PIs have to be appropriately dressed
to discharge their duties.
It was brought to the attention of the Commission that the state has some
Coaches in various sports disciplines who are posted in different parts of the
state. Most of them have been outstanding sportsperson in their heydays, but
are now languishing due to lack of promotion. They have also sought
enhancement of their scales. The Commission examined the nature of their jobs
and felt that they be retained in their primary function of coaching and not get
integrated in the Sports Directorate. They have sought enhancement of their
scales and payment of Kit Maintenance Allowance.
The Soil Conservation department is mandated to conserve the two most vital
major resources of nature: soil and water. The Commission was also informed
that the Soil Conservation Department of Assam has been made the nodal
department for the Integrated Watershed Development Programme of the
Government of India. Thus the Department has a crucial role to play in
ecological sustainability of the region. The potential of the department to deliver
and contribute to environmental protection is very high.
5. All the field level posts at the lowest level should all be clubbed
into one category. The jobs in this category should be
multifunctional and redeployable to make the job-incumbents
more productive.
The Commission heard the representation from Shri Babul Chandra Bora,
Curator and Scientific-in-Charge of the Gauhati Planetarium. The Commission,
after reviewing his case recommends that the aforesaid post be placed
in Pay Band 4 with Grade Pay Rs. 5900. The Commission is also of the view
that the Planetarium should be converted into a more vibrant organisation and
more such planetoria be built in the state to spread the culture of science
amongst the youth.
Issues
The main issues raised by the employees of the department are as follows:
2. 30% Deaf Allowance for teachers of Deaf and Dumb School, Kahilipara.
3. Promotion scope for District Social Welfare Officer (DSWO) and others.
Recommendation
After considering all the relevant factors, the Commission recommends the
following:
Transport Department
The Commission notes that the Transport Department has certain statutory roles
to play, notably under various acts such as Motor Vehicles Act. Hence, there has
to be a certain minimum amount of professional competence among the
personnel of the department. A highly mixed group of officials may not be able
to work in a coherent manner and deliver the results desired from the
department.
After considering all the relevant factors, the Commission recommends as
follows:
Enforcement Inspectors
During the oral hearing the All Assam Transport Enforcement Officers’
Association highlighted the Associations’ grievance that the Enforcement
Inspectors under the Transport Department have been conferred the
gazetted status by the government without giving them the mandatory
minimum pay scale which was at the relevant time Rs.1475-3825 and
which currently translates to Rs.3760-9400. The Association also
submitted that their efforts to resolve the anomaly through
representations filed before the government have not been successful.
The Association in that connection brought to the notice of the
Commission the judgment in W.P(C) No.2154/99 wherein occurs the
following,
“To create a particular pays scale to a particular group of officers or to a
particular category of services is in the exclusive domain and jurisdiction
of the Pay Commission. On what consideration the Pay Commission did
not recommend the pay scale of Rs.1475-3825/- is for consideration of
the Pay Commission and this court cannot substitute the decision of the
Pay Commission”.
The judgment directed the government to consider the representation of
the petitioners in the writ petition. The government requested the present
Pay Commission to consider the representation.
The Commission in Para 2.1.14 of this report noted the lack of functional
utility of the system of conferring gazetted status and its potential both
for arbitrary abuse as well as for spawning litigation. In Para 2.1.15, the
Commission recommended discontinuance of the system. The
circumstances under which, the Enforcement Inspectors were conferred
the gazetted status even though they did not fulfill the mandatory
condition regarding the pay scale have not been made clear to the
Commission. The Commission has devised a new pay structure comprising
of running Pay Bands instead of pay scales. Even if notionally the current
pay scale of Rs.3580-8750 is to be first changed to Rs.3760-9400 and
then is to be placed in the relevant Pay Band that would involve change of
Pay Band resulting in imbalance and more anomalies in the pay structure.
In consideration of all the relevant factors and in the light thereof closely
considering the direction in the judgment, the Commission finds no
justification for the up-gradation in the current pay scale of the
Enforcement Inspectors.
Tourism Department
Tourism has been recognised as a potential growth area for the state and there
has been a surge in the number of foreign and Indian tourists visiting the state
as reported. The Commission heard the representations made by various
associations and individuals of the department as well as interacted with the
departmental officials. The Commission notes that the Tourism Directorate
carries many posts which are either obsolete or non-functional.
The Directorate has a few Receptionists who have no growth prospect and also
very limited work. It is recommended that they be redeployed to other jobs
depending on their aptitude and qualifications and if they are eligible, may be
considered for their eventual promotion as Assistant Tourist Information Officers.
The Department should not undertake recruitment to the posts of Receptionist
any more.
Issues
Recommendation
1. The present incumbent will get benefit under new system of Pay
Bands and Grade Pay. Terminal pay may be given to present
incumbents.
WPTBC Department
Issues
Recommendations
Works Departments
Issues
Recommendation
After considering all relevant factors, the Commission recommends as
follows:
6. Shri Doley shall get the benefit of the new system of running Pay
Bands.
7. The Commission has separately recommended Advance Increment
with detail guidelines in Chapter 3.2.
Chapter 11
Executive Summary of The Report
Pay Revision
Grade Pay
11.3 Every post, barring that of Commissioner and Secretary has a
distinct grade pay attached to it. Within a department, Grade Pay shall
determine the status of a post with a senior post which is given higher
Grade Pay. The total number of grades is 30 which are spread across five
distinct running pay bands. The grade pay is given within the limits as
given by Government of India. The outline of the new pay structure is
given below.
Annual Increment
11.6 Annual increments shall be paid at the rate of 1% of the total of pay in
the Pay Band and the corresponding Grade Pay. The date of annual increment,
in all cases, shall be the first of July. Employees completing six months and
above in the grade as on July 1 shall be eligible.
Allowances
11.8 The Commission recommends no change in the existing system of
granting Dearness Allowance in line with that of Government of India.
Existing rates of most of the allowances like Daily Allowance, House Rent
Allowance, Hill Area Allowance etc. have been enhanced to meet the
requirements of the situation. Various allowance like City Compensatory
Allowance, Conveyance Allowance, Special Pay have been abolished. The
Commission has recommended introduction of Risk Insurance Scheme
and Comprehensive Health Insurance Scheme in place of present
allowances.
Benefits to the Women Employees and Disabled Employees
11.9 The Commission has recommended various benefits for women
employees like Maternity Leave of 180 days, reservation in allotment of
Government Quarters etc. Disabled employees are given benefits like
Disability Allowance, Constant Attendant Allowance, Child Care Allowance
for disabled women employees, enhanced number of days of Casual
Leave etc. The Commission has also recommended provision of special
aids and appliances for facilitating office work, interest subsidy for
automobile loans for disabled employees.
Other Benefits
11.10 The Commission has recommended LTC in the initial years of
career. It has also recommended tying up with Public Sector Banks for
loans to be given to the employees which shall replace the existing
system of granting advances to the employees. Insurance coverage under
Group Insurance Scheme is proposed to be enhanced for all employees.
Advance increment is recommended for few categories on evaluation of
improved performance owing to attainment of higher educational
qualification.
Leave Matters
11.12 The Commission has recommended reduction in number of days of
Casual Leave from 15 to 8. The principal and headmasters of schools and
colleges shall get 30 days earned leave in a year. All employees of
vacation departments shall be entitled to Half Pay Leave of 20 days in a
year and Leave Encashment benefit of 150 days at the time of retirement.
Maternity leave has been enhanced to 180 days. The Commission has
recommended introduction of Paternity Leave of 15 days. The
Commission has recommended introduction of Special Study Leave for
teachers and other academic staff.
Reorganisation of Services
11.14 The Commission has recommended that there should be two levels of
Directorates in regard to pay and allowances and pay related benefits of officers
and staff of various Directorates. Pyramidal structure for all Heads of
Departments including field offices is recommended to ensure symmetrical set
up and reasonable promotion avenues. The Commission also recommends that
the Government may examine reorganisation of functions and related services in
respect of Statistics, Publicity, Planning and Library services etc. These
functions, across all departments, could be made the responsibility of
departments such as DE&S, Information and Public Relations, Planning and
Library Services. The Commission has also recommended enrichment of the
functions presently performed by employees in Class IV posts. All unskilled jobs
and functions which are not core functions of the department be outsourced. The
Commission has recommended introduction of Assam Administrative Service for
better administration and effective cadre management.
Financial Implications
11.16 The annual additional financial implication owing to the
Commission’s various recommendations is estimated to be Rs 4500
Crores for 2009-10 which is estimated to increase by 10% during each
subsequent year due to increase in Dearness Allowance, annual
increments etc. The Commission has suggested various measures to
mitigate the additional financial burden arising out of recommended pay
revision.
Date of implementation
11.17 The Commission recommends that the revised pay structure is
effective from 1.4.2009 but the revised pay for employees shall be
notionally fixed as on 1.1.2006. The pay of the employees would be fixed
along with increments at 1%, Dearness Allowance etc. with effect from
1.1.2006 but no arrears would be paid for the period between 1.1.2006
and 31.3.2009. All recommendations regarding allowances and other
benefits will take effect only prospectively.
Concluding Remarks
Sd/-
(Bhaskar Barua)
Chairman
Sd/- Sd/-
(P.C. Sharma) (Surendra Mohan Deka)
Member Member
Sd/- Sd/-
(Shantikam Hazarika) (H.S. Das)
Member Member Secretary
THE ASSAM PAY COMMISSION
2008
Annex
October 2009
Annexure
No. Content Page No.
1.1 Notification of constitution of 6th Assam Pay commission 1
1.2 A. The Questionnaire circulated by the commission 6
B. List of individuals/ Group of individuals who submitted 13
Commission
Commission
Commissions
1.1.1 Table showing minimum wages as per ILC 48
By order etc.
By order etc.
(L.C. Borbarua)
Joint Secretary to the Government of Assam
Finance (Pay Research Unit) Department
Annex 1.2
A. The Questionnaire circulated by the Commission.
QUESTIONNAIRE
A. PRINCIPLES
1. The terms of reference of the present State Pay Commission, inter-
alia’, are to examine the principles, which should govern the structure of
emoluments and conditions of service of the State Government
employees. What principles would you suggest for the Commission to
follow?
2. To what extent and in what manner should the pay scales of the State
Government employees of the Government of Assam be related to the
average per capita State income?
3. Do you feel that the state economy can bear the additional financial
burden that may arise due to any upward revision of salaries expected
from the pay commission? If yes, then please give reasons.
4. Seeing that any increase in expenditure due to upward revision of
salaries of Government employees would impact on the resources
available to the State Government, reducing the resources available for
delivery of services to the public, how would you reconcile such revision
without causing any adverse impact on the delivery of services?
5. As the State Government own and control many public sector
undertakings, do you think that there should be a reasonable parity
between the salaries, paid by such undertakings and those by the
Government to their employees for comparable work?
6. How do you reconcile any increase in remuneration of Government
employees with the requirement to augment employment opportunities in
the country?
7. (a) Do you have any specific suggestion for effecting economy in the
expenditure on Government employees so that the net effect of increased
emoluments for Government employees may be kept within reasonable
limits?
(b) What do you think can be the useful role of modern technological
innovations to reduce the cost of service delivery along with improvement
in the some?
8. What do you consider would be an appropriate ceiling for Government’s
total expenditure on its employees as a percentage of its total revenue?
9. How far do you think that the difference in the price indices, local
conditions etc. in Assam, as compared to those of other State should be
determining factor for the revision of pay structure or dearness allowance
in the case of the State Government employees?
10. (a) Would you recommend direct recruitment at intermediate levels of
service in order to infuse fresh talent?
(b) How would you reconcile such a course i.e. direct recruitment at
intermediate level with ensuring promotion prospects of existing
employees and without any possible reduction in the attractiveness of
Government service?
11. In view of 87% of Assam’s population living in the rural areas would
you agree to the suggestion to give a higher pay scale/special pay to
government employees residing and serving in rural areas?
B. STRUCTURE AND SCALES OF PAY
12. What are your suggestions on the length of pay scales (i.e. time span)
on the existing pay structure under the State Government? State your
views relating to the ratio of the minimum of the pay scale to its
maximum.
13. Would you recommend additional remuneration for employees,
possessing qualification which is higher than the minimum prescribed?
Should this apply to only technical and scientific posts or for all posts?
Should this apply to any qualification acquired during the course of
service and at the cost of government also?
14. What suggestion, if any, would you like to make for laying down the
criteria and procedure for promotion for State Government employees?
15. What measures would you suggest to ensure larger promotion
opportunities and for facilitating vertical mobility, specially in the case of
lower categories of Government employees? Should the proportion of the
promotion posts be changed?
16. Are the existing salary scales adequate for attracting scientific and
technical personnel to the Government jobs? Do you agree with the view
that the pay scales of specified technical and scientific posts should be
kept higher than those of comparable levels in the non-technical services
to encourage better talents to pursue scientific and technical
advancement and growth?
17. (a) What should be the normal promotional prospect for a
Government employee?
(b) It is suggested that at least two promotions in a service career should
be assured to a Government employee. After how many years of service
should an employee have his first promotion?
18. (a) The minimum salary (Pay including Dearness Pay, Dearness
Allowance and Interim Relief) in the State Government as on 30.5.08 was
Rs.56521-. Do you think this is adequate?
(b) The present maximum salary amongst the State Government
employees (Pay including Dearness Pay, Dearness Allowance and Interim
Relief) as on 30.5.08 was Rs. 38,485/- Do you think it is appropriate for
the type of functions and responsibilities at these senior levels? Should it
be increased? If so, by how much?
(c) The present ratio between the maximum basic pay and the minimum
basic pay in the State Government is 7:1. Do you think it should be
changed and if so, what would be a reasonable ratio?
19. Have you any other suggestion to make in the matter for rationalizing
rising the pay structure for various categories of services! post of State
Government?
20. Are you aware of any anomalies in the exiting pay scales in any
department office of the Government of Assam vis-à-vis pay scales for
similar categories in other department or offices under the State
Government? If so, please specify the same and give your suggestions for
removing them.
21. The Sixth Central Pay Commission has recommended that all
increments of employees should be affected on one day in the year. What
are your views on this?
22. (a) Have you ever expressed that there should be provision of annual
assessment in all pay scales as it would serve two useful purposes viz. (a)
guidance to the employee about areas of weakness which need to be
strengthened and (b) assessment by supervisor about the work to be
assigned to and expected from an employee? Have you any views on this?
(b) In what manner can the output and outcome of functioning of
Government employee be assessed, according to what yardsticks and
indicators and how it should be linked to pay scales?
(c) Should the annual increment of a Government employee be subject to
the above mentioned assessment?
23.(a) what is your concept of stagnation in services under the
Government? Does it mean lack of avenue for promotion or non-
availability of increment? What solution o you suggest for the problem?
(b) Do you consider grant of “Stagnation increment” as an effective
means of providing relief to an employee? What criteria would you
suggest for following such increment?
24.(a) on what factors should salary differential be based? What
weightage would you attach to the following factors?
(i) Nature of duties performed by the Government employees,
(ii) Qualifications and special training.
(iii) Method of recruitment.
(b) What do you suggest to determine similarity of duties and
responsibilities of various services under the State Government?
25. What avenue of promotion would you suggest for isolated posts,
which o art have any regular promotion channel?
26.(a) Posts under the State Government are, at present, distributed in
30pay scales. Is there scope for rationalizing the pay scales and further
reducing their number? Please have specific suggestion.
(b) If the pay scale of a post is reduced because of the effort to reduce
the total number of pay scales, would it be enough, if individual cases of
any hardship that may thereby be caused are suitably re-adjusted to the
extent necessary?
27. Do you think that present pay-structures for State Government
employees broadly reflect the duties and responsibilities of posts at
various levels in different Government departments? Are there any posts,
where the existing relativities need review; please specify the same with
reasons thereof.
28. Are you in favor of continuing the existing system of special pay? If
not, what other arrangement would be suitable?
29.(a) Do you consider that it is necessary to introduce the system of non
practicing allowance to the medical officers ? If not what other measures
do you suggest to ensure discontinuance of private practice?
(b) It is said that the practice of private tuition by the teachers has
adversely affected the quality of education. What measures do you
suggest as a remedy thereto?
(c) Some other technical and professional employees have represented
that allowances similar to N.P.A should be made available to them also.
What are your views in the matter?
(d) Should government encourage medical and other technical personnel
to improve their qualifications and devise a system for the grant of
adequate personal pay to those acquiring such qualification where the
additional qualification, so acquired is substantial or particularly useful in
discharge of duties?
30. Do you have any suggestion in regard to the existing scheme of
deputation allowances?
C. DEARNESS ALLOWANCE
31.(a) Would you consider it advisable for the State Government to
insulate its own employee against rise in prices, while the people in
general are not afforded adequate protection against the rise in price ?
(b) What other measures apart from D.A. would you suggest to neutralize
the effect of rise in prices?
32. Are you in favor of the continuance of the existing D.A. increase
formula? Do you suggest any modification on the same? If so, what is
your suggestion?
33. It may be held that, since dearness allowance is intended to protect
the real income of salaried employees, neutralisation should be hundred
percent for all categories of employees. Do you think this would be
possible within the resources of the State Government and the demands
thereon for developmental planning?
34. Do you consider that in order to reduce office work and to ensure
proper budgetary allocation, dearness allowance should be granted only
once a year to neutralize the effect of price increase during the previous
year. What are your views in this regard?
D. OTHER ALLOWANCES
35. Have you any suggestion regarding the condition of eligibility or
quantum the following allowances?
1. Traveling/ Daily Allowances;
2. House Rent Allowance;
3. Compensatory Allowance;
4. Hill Compensatory Allowance;
5. City Compensatory Allowance and
6. Any Other Allowance.
36. Do you suggest with regard to change if any, in the existing rates on
transfer grant and baggage allowance?
37. Do you think that rates of Traveling and Daily allowance on tour
require modification? If so, what do you suggest as proper allowance?
E. DEATH-CUM-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
38. How far raising of the age of retirement of government employees to
60 years has affected (a) the prospects of serving employees and (b)
employment avenues? In the light of answers to these questions, would
you favour raising the age of retirement of the government employees?
39. It has been suggested that employees serving on temporary basis for
the specified number of years should be given the same pensionary
benefits as employees in permanent posts. If your answer is yes, what is
the number of years of service that may be fixed for this purpose?
40. It has been suggested that government employees may be permitted
to retire voluntarily after 15 years of service instead of 20 years of
service, as at present. What are your views?
41. Should there be any ceiling of the amount of pension and gratuity or
it should be periodically adjusted upwards?
42. The Sixth Central Pay Commission has recommended that the
quantum of pension should be raised upward upon pensioners attaining
specific ages such as 80, 85, and 90 years, etc. What are your views on
this?
43. If the existing family pension rates are considered inadequate, what
improvement would you suggest?
44. Should special family pension against death by violence or accident
attributable to service be given to certain categories of employees? If so,
at what rate?
45. It has been suggested that the government employees on retirement
may be given dearness allowance on pension at the same rate as the
serving employees. What are our views?
46. Have you any suggestion for the improvement of the existing Group
Insurance Scheme applicable to the State Government employees?
47. Are you in favour of continuance of the existing system of Provident
Fund Scheme?
(a) If so, what improvement would you suggest?
(b) What would be a reasonable rate of interest on the Provident Fund
after taking into account the benefits accruing from it?
48. What measures, if any, would you suggest for protecting pension of
the existing government employees from erosion on account of the
possible increase in cost of living ?
49. It is felt that Family Pension on a graded scale be granted to enable
the spouse to maintain the same life style, the pensioner is accustomed to
while in service. Give your views.
F. CONDITIONS OF SERVICE FACILITIES AND AMENITIES
50. Do you have any suggestion for improving the present system of
giving honorarium?
51. Do you have any suggestion for improving the present system of
giving advances of different types?
52. What are your views regarding the present system of Leave Travel
Concession?
53. Will it be desirable to provide insurance cover against bodily injury or
death to those employees, who run a high risk of violence by criminals in
the discharge of their duties?
54. What are your views in regard to the present scheme of granting
medical allowance? If any modification is proposed, give reasons.
55. At present, Earned Leave can be accumulated up to a maximum of
300 days. It has been suggested that there should be no such restriction.
What are your views?
56. At present, Earned Leave is allowed to be encashed only at the time
of retirement. It has been suggested that 50 percent of the Earned Leave
admissible in a year may be allowed to be encashed during service. If you
are in favour of such encashment, what conditions would be stipulated to
ensure that the basic purpose of leave is not defeated?
57. It has been urged that, the scheme of payment of bonus to the State
Government employees should be introduced in the line of the Central
Government. What are your views and suggestions in this regard? Will it
be possible for the State to bear the financial burden if payment of bonus
is not linked with productivity and income effected directly by the
services? Give reasons in favour of your suggestions.
58. Do you have any suggestion in regard to the following:-
(a) Canteen Facility.
(b) Uniform and protective Clothing.
(c) Washing Allowance, and
(d) Other Welfare Measures.
59. There are some Departments/ Institutions, which have employees
who cannot avail holidays/ Sundays owing to nature of duties. Would you
suggest some allowance or adjustable work schedule for them?
60. (a) It has been urged that the existing ceiling for House Building
Advance is inadequate. What limit would you suggest?
(b) Do you have any suggestion for the government promoting an House
Building Advance schemes linked with concerned financial Institutions like
SBI. (Home Finance) HUDCO, etc. for the benefit of the State
Government employees?
61. Suggestion has been made that the amount of advance admissible to
a government servant for purchase of a vehicle should be equal to the
actual cost of the vehicle. Would you support this view? What should in
your view be the revised ceiling for Bi-cycle Scooter, Motor-cycle and
Motor-car advance?
G. RATIONALISATION OF SERVICES
62. It has been held that the existing rules of pay fixation do not provide
any substantial benefits on promotion. What are your suggestions in this
regard?
63. Would you suggest any principle/ formula to be adopted for the
fixation of pay in the event of revision of pay scales for any post of
service? If so, give illustrations.
64. Does the grant of quasi-permanent status serve any useful purpose?
What are your views about its continuance?
65. Please give your suggestions regarding re-organisation of services or
categories of posts, rationalization of designation, reduction the number
of grades/ categories in service/ posts in the existing set-up of the State
Government?
66. What yardstick would you suggest to determine the work-load in any
particular service or post as the means of assessing the required strength
of such service or posts?
67. Do you think that there has been excessive expansion in the strength
of officers or staff in any office or department under the State
Government? If so, what reduction and basis for affecting such reduction
you would suggest?
68. What specific measures and method would you suggest for ensuring
optimum efficiency and economy in the various government offices and
establishments?
H. WORK METHODS AND ENVIRONMENT
69. International Labour Organization fixed 40 hours of works per week
as the international work norm. What are your views/ suggestions about
this work norm for government employees? Working hours/ days are lost
through Bandh/ Boycott/ Strike etc. Do you think that such loss of
working hours/ days may be made good by compensatory work?
70. What are your suggestions for utilization of more time for improving
the quality and quantity of work at offices?
71. There is a general perception that performance of the government
employees is at low ebb and public confidence in the services has
generally eroded. What according to you are the contributing factors?
What are your suggestions to overcome such factors and to improve
public confidence in the services?
72. Would you suggest any role to the service Associations to promote
efficiency and honesty of its members in the service delivery system?
73. Do you have any suggestions as regards processing and disposal of
public complaints against government employees?
I. GENERAL
74. Do you have any comment on any other matter, falling within the
terms of reference of the present State Pay Commission but not covered
by this Questionnaire?
B. List of individual/group of individuals who submitted reply to the
Assam pay commission, 2008
Source: Average market rates in Kolkata, Chennai, Delhi and Mumbai as indicated in the Economic Times &
other major dailies (element of 20% has been added to cover the increase in cost in retail sale).
Notes PCU = Per day Consumption Unit 3CU = Three Consumption Units
* 20% Miscellaneous charges towards fuel, electricity, water etc.
** Additional Expense at the rate of 25% includes expenditure towards education, medical treatment, housing,
recreation, festivals etc.
# Has been taken as Rs.400 because separate allowances for education, medical treatment and housing exist
in the Government. Consequently, only the expenditure towards recreation & festivals need to be taken in
account.
^ Being the license fee chargeable for government accommodation at an average rate of 3% of the basic pay
Annex:2.1.1
Fitment Table-1
Sl. No. Basic Pay in Revised pay in Grade Pay Total Pay
the pre- the running pay
revised scale band
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
Sl. No. Basic Pay in the Revised pay in the Grade Pay Total Pay
pre-revised scale running pay band
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
Sl. No. Basic Pay in the Revised pay in the Grade Pay Total Pay
pre-revised scale running pay band
Sl. No. Basic Pay in the Revised pay in the Grade Pay Total Pay Total Pay With
pre-revised scale running pay band Adhoc Fitment
[See 2.1.8
(iv)]
Fitment Table-5
Pre-revised Scale - Rs.2650- Revised Pay Band (PB -2)+ Grade Pay
40-2770-60-3490-90-4480- Rs.5200 - 20200 + Rs.1900
120-5200
Sl. No. Basic Pay in the Revised pay in the Grade Pay Total Pay Total Pay With
pre-revised scale running pay band Adhoc Fitment
[See 2.1.8
(iv)]
Fitment Table-6
Pre-revised Scale - Rs.2890- Revised Pay Band (PB -2)+ Grade Pay
60-3490-90-4480-120- Rs.5200 - 20200 + Rs.2000
5200-175-5725
Sl. No. Basic Pay in the Revised pay in Grade Total Pay
pre-revised scale the running Pay
pay band
Fitment Table-7
Pre-revised Scale - Rs.3010- Revised Pay Band (PB -2)+ Grade Pay
60-3490-90-4480-120- Rs.5200 - 20200 + Rs.2100
5200-175-6075
Sl. No. Basic Pay in the Revised pay in Grade Total Pay
pre-revised scale the running Pay
pay band
Fitment Table-8
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -2)+ Grade Pay
Rs.3130-60-3490-90- Rs.5200 - 20200 + Rs.2200
4480-120-5200-175-
6600
Sl. No. Basic Pay in the Revised pay in Grade Total Pay
pre-revised scale the running Pay
pay band
Fitment Table-9
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -2)+ Grade Pay
Rs.3370-60-3490- Rs.5200 - 20200 + Rs.2300
90-4480-120-5200-
175-6600-250-7100
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
1 3370 6270 2300 8570
2 3430 6380 2300 8680
3 3490 6500 2300 8800
4 3580 6660 2300 8960
5 3670 6830 2300 9130
6 3760 7000 2300 9300
7 3850 7170 2300 9470
8 3940 7330 2300 9630
9 4030 7500 2300 9800
10 4120 7670 2300 9970
11 4210 7840 2300 10140
12 4300 8000 2300 10300
13 4390 8170 2300 10470
14 4480 8340 2300 10640
15 4600 8560 2300 10860
16 4720 8780 2300 11080
17 4840 9010 2300 11310
18 4960 9230 2300 11530
19 5080 9450 2300 11750
19 5200 9680 2300 11980
20 5375 10000 2300 12300
21 5550 10330 2300 12630
22 5725 10650 2300 12950
23 5900 10980 2300 13280
24 6075 11300 2300 13600
25 6250 11630 2300 13930
26 6425 11960 2300 14260
27 6600 12280 2300 14580
28 6850 12750 2300 15050
29 7100 13210 2300 15510
SI-I 7350 13680 2300 15980
SI-II 7600 14140 2300 16440
SI-III 7850 14610 2300 16910
Fitment Table-10
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -2)+ Grade Pay
Rs.3850-90-4480- Rs.5200 - 20200 + Rs.2400
120-5200-175-6600-
250-7350
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
1 3850 7170 2400 9570
2 3940 7330 2400 9730
3 4030 7500 2400 9900
4 4120 7670 2400 10070
5 4210 7840 2400 10240
6 4300 8000 2400 10400
7 4390 8170 2400 10570
8 4480 8340 2400 10740
9 4600 8560 2400 10960
10 4720 8780 2400 11180
11 4840 9010 2400 11410
12 4960 9230 2400 11630
13 5080 9450 2400 11850
14 5200 9680 2400 12080
15 5375 10000 2400 12400
16 5550 10330 2400 12730
17 5725 10650 2400 13050
18 5900 10980 2400 13380
19 6075 11300 2400 13700
20 6250 11630 2400 14030
21 6425 11960 2400 14360
22 6600 12280 2400 14680
23 6850 12750 2400 15150
24 7100 13210 2400 15610
25 7350 13680 2400 16080
SI-I 7600 14140 2400 16540
SI-II 7850 14610 2400 17010
SI-III 8100 15070 2400 17470
Fitment Table-11
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -2)+ Grade Pay
Rs.3490-90-4480- Rs.5200 - 20200 + Rs.2500
120-5200-175-6600-
250-8100
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
1 3490 6500 2500 9000
2 3580 6660 2500 9160
3 3670 6830 2500 9330
4 3760 7000 2500 9500
5 3850 7170 2500 9670
6 3940 7330 2500 9830
7 4030 7500 2500 10000
8 4120 7670 2500 10170
9 4210 7840 2500 10340
10 4300 8000 2500 10500
11 4390 8170 2500 10670
12 4480 8340 2500 10840
13 4600 8560 2500 11060
14 4720 8780 2500 11280
15 4840 9010 2500 11510
16 4960 9230 2500 11730
17 5080 9450 2500 11950
18 5200 9680 2500 12180
19 5375 10000 2500 12500
20 5550 10330 2500 12830
21 5725 10650 2500 13150
22 5900 10980 2500 13480
23 6075 11300 2500 13800
24 6250 11630 2500 14130
25 6425 11960 2500 14460
26 6600 12280 2500 14780
27 6850 12750 2500 15250
28 7100 13210 2500 15710
29 7350 13680 2500 16180
30 7600 14140 2500 16640
31 7850 14610 2500 17110
32 8100 15070 2500 17570
SI-I 8425 15680 2500 18180
SI-II 8750 16280 2500 18780
SI-III 9075 16880 2500 19380
Fitment Table-12
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -2)+ Grade Pay
Rs.3940-90-4480- Rs.5200 - 20200 + Rs.2600
120-5200-175-6600-
250-8100-325-8425
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
1 3940 7330 2600 9930
2 4030 7500 2600 10100
3 4120 7670 2600 10270
4 4210 7840 2600 10440
5 4300 8000 2600 10600
6 4390 8170 2600 10770
7 4480 8340 2600 10940
8 4600 8560 2600 11160
9 4720 8780 2600 11380
10 4840 9010 2600 11610
11 4960 9230 2600 11830
12 5080 9450 2600 12050
13 5200 9680 2600 12280
14 5375 10000 2600 12600
15 5550 10330 2600 12930
16 5725 10650 2600 13250
17 5900 10980 2600 13580
18 6075 11300 2600 13900
19 6250 11630 2600 14230
20 6425 11960 2600 14560
21 6600 12280 2600 14880
22 6850 12750 2600 15350
23 7100 13210 2600 15810
24 7350 13680 2600 16280
25 7600 14140 2600 16740
26 7850 14610 2600 17210
27 8100 15070 2600 17670
28 8425 15680 2600 18280
SI-I 8750 16280 2600 18880
SI-II 9075 16880 2600 19480
SI-III 9400 17490 2600 20090
Fitment Table-13
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -2)+ Grade Pay
Rs.3580-90-4480- Rs.5200 - 20200 + Rs.2800
120-5200-175-6600-
250-8100-325-8750
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
1 3580 6660 2800 9460
2 3670 6830 2800 9630
3 3760 7000 2800 9800
4 3850 7170 2800 9970
5 3940 7330 2800 10130
6 4030 7500 2800 10300
7 4120 7670 2800 10470
8 4210 7840 2800 10640
9 4300 8000 2800 10800
10 4390 8170 2800 10970
11 4480 8340 2800 11140
12 4600 8560 2800 11360
13 4720 8780 2800 11580
14 4840 9010 2800 11810
15 4960 9230 2800 12030
16 5080 9450 2800 12250
17 5200 9680 2800 12480
18 5375 10000 2800 12800
19 5550 10330 2800 13130
20 5725 10650 2800 13450
21 5900 10980 2800 13780
22 6075 11300 2800 14100
23 6250 11630 2800 14430
24 6425 11960 2800 14760
25 6600 12280 2800 15080
26 6850 12750 2800 15550
27 7100 13210 2800 16010
28 7350 13680 2800 16480
29 7600 14140 2800 16940
30 7850 14610 2800 17410
31 8100 15070 2800 17870
32 8425 15680 2800 18480
33 8750 16280 2800 19080
SI-I 9075 16880 2800 19680
SI-II 9400 17490 2800 20290
SI-III 9725 18090 2800 20890
Fitment Table-14
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -3)+ Grade Pay
Rs.4300-90-4480- Rs.8000 - 35000 + Rs.4200
120-5200-175-6600-
250-8100-325-9075
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
1 4300 8000 4200 12200
2 4390 8170 4200 12370
3 4480 8340 4200 12540
4 4600 8560 4200 12760
5 4720 8780 4200 12980
6 4840 9010 4200 13210
7 4960 9230 4200 13430
8 5080 9450 4200 13650
9 5200 9680 4200 13880
10 5375 10000 4200 14200
11 5550 10330 4200 14530
12 5725 10650 4200 14850
13 5900 10980 4200 15180
14 6075 11300 4200 15500
15 6250 11630 4200 15830
16 6425 11960 4200 16160
17 6600 12280 4200 16480
18 6850 12750 4200 16950
19 7100 13210 4200 17410
20 7350 13680 4200 17880
21 7600 14140 4200 18340
22 7850 14610 4200 18810
23 8100 15070 4200 19270
24 8425 15680 4200 19880
25 8750 16280 4200 20480
26 9075 16880 4200 21080
SI-I 9400 17490 4200 21690
SI-II 9725 18090 4200 22290
SI-III 10050 18700 4200 22900
Fitment Table-15
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -3)+ Grade Pay
Rs.3760-90-4480- Rs.8000 - 35000 + Rs.4300
120-5200-175-6600-
250-8100-325-9400
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay Total Pay With
in the in the Adhoc Fitment
pre- running pay [See 2.1.8
revised band (iv)]
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs)
1 3760 8000 4300 12300 12300
2 3850 8000 4300 12300 12350
3 3940 8000 4300 12300 12400
4 4030 8000 4300 12300 12450
5 4120 8000 4300 12300 12500
6 4210 8000 4300 12300 12550
7 4300 8000 4300 12300 12600
8 4390 8170 4300 12470 12650
9 4480 8340 4300 12640 12700
10 4600 8560 4300 12860 12860
11 4720 8780 4300 13080 13080
12 4840 9010 4300 13310 13310
13 4960 9230 4300 13530 13530
14 5080 9450 4300 13750 13750
15 5200 9680 4300 13980 13980
16 5375 10000 4300 14300 14300
17 5550 10330 4300 14630 14630
18 5725 10650 4300 14950 14950
19 5900 10980 4300 15280 15280
20 6075 11300 4300 15600 15600
21 6250 11630 4300 15930 15930
22 6425 11960 4300 16260 16260
23 6600 12280 4300 16580 16580
24 6850 12750 4300 17050 17050
25 7100 13210 4300 17510 17510
26 7350 13680 4300 17980 17980
27 7600 14140 4300 18440 18440
28 7850 14610 4300 18910 18910
29 8100 15070 4300 19370 19370
30 8425 15680 4300 19980 19980
31 8750 16280 4300 20580 20580
32 9075 16880 4300 21180 21180
33 9400 17490 4300 21790 21790
SI-I 9725 18090 4300 22390 22390
SI-II 10050 18700 4300 23000 23000
SI-III 10375 19300 4300 23600 23600
Fitment Table-16
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -3)+ Grade Pay
Rs.4120-90-4480- Rs.8000 - 35000 + Rs.4500
120-5200-175-6600-
250-8100-325-9725
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay Total Pay With
in the in the Adhoc Fitment
pre- running pay [See 2.1.8
revised band (iv)]
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs)
1 4120 8000 4500 12500 12500
2 4210 8000 4500 12500 12550
3 4300 8000 4500 12500 12600
4 4390 8170 4500 12670 12670
5 4480 8340 4500 12840 12840
6 4600 8560 4500 13060 13060
7 4720 8780 4500 13280 13280
8 4840 9010 4500 13510 13510
9 4960 9230 4500 13730 13730
10 5080 9450 4500 13950 13950
11 5200 9680 4500 14180 14180
12 5375 10000 4500 14500 14500
13 5550 10330 4500 14830 14830
14 5725 10650 4500 15150 15150
15 5900 10980 4500 15480 15480
16 6075 11300 4500 15800 15800
17 6250 11630 4500 16130 16130
18 6425 11960 4500 16460 16460
19 6600 12280 4500 16780 16780
20 6850 12750 4500 17250 17250
21 7100 13210 4500 17710 17710
22 7350 13680 4500 18180 18180
23 7600 14140 4500 18640 18640
24 7850 14610 4500 19110 19110
25 8100 15070 4500 19570 19570
26 8425 15680 4500 20180 20180
27 8750 16280 4500 20780 20780
28 9075 16880 4500 21380 21380
29 9400 17490 4500 21990 21990
30 9725 18090 4500 22590 22590
SI-I 10050 18700 4500 23200 23200
SI-II 10375 19300 4500 23800 23800
SI-III 10700 19910 4500 24410 24410
Fitment Table-17
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -3)+ Grade Pay
Rs.4960-120-5200- Rs.8000 - 35000 + Rs.4600
175-6600-250-8100-
325-10050
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
1 4960 9230 4600 13830
2 5080 9450 4600 14050
3 5200 9680 4600 14280
4 5375 10000 4600 14600
5 5550 10330 4600 14930
6 5725 10650 4600 15250
7 5900 10980 4600 15580
8 6075 11300 4600 15900
9 6250 11630 4600 16230
10 6425 11960 4600 16560
11 6600 12280 4600 16880
12 6850 12750 4600 17350
13 7100 13210 4600 17810
14 7350 13680 4600 18280
15 7600 14140 4600 18740
16 7850 14610 4600 19210
17 8100 15070 4600 19670
18 8425 15680 4600 20280
19 8750 16280 4600 20880
20 9075 16880 4600 21480
21 9400 17490 4600 22090
22 9725 18090 4600 22690
23 10050 18700 4600 23300
SI-I 10375 19300 4600 23900
SI-II 10700 19910 4600 24510
SI-III 11025 20510 4600 25110
Fitment Table-18
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -3) + Grade Pay
Rs.4210-90-4480- Rs.8000 - 35000 + Rs.4700
120-5200-175-6600-
250-8100-325-10375
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay Total Pay With
in the in the Adhoc Fitment
pre- running pay [See 2.1.8
revised band (iv)]
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs)
1 4210 8000 4700 12700 12700
2 4300 8000 4700 12700 12750
2 4390 8170 4700 12870 12870
3 4480 8340 4700 13040 13040
4 4600 8560 4700 13260 13260
5 4720 8780 4700 13480 13480
6 4840 9010 4700 13710 13710
7 4960 9230 4700 13930 13930
8 5080 9450 4700 14150 14150
9 5200 9680 4700 14380 14380
10 5375 10000 4700 14700 14700
11 5550 10330 4700 15030 15030
12 5725 10650 4700 15350 15350
13 5900 10980 4700 15680 15680
14 6075 11300 4700 16000 16000
15 6250 11630 4700 16330 16330
16 6425 11960 4700 16660 16660
17 6600 12280 4700 16980 16980
18 6850 12750 4700 17450 17450
19 7100 13210 4700 17910 17910
20 7350 13680 4700 18380 18380
21 7600 14140 4700 18840 18840
22 7850 14610 4700 19310 19310
23 8100 15070 4700 19770 19770
24 8425 15680 4700 20380 20380
25 8750 16280 4700 20980 20980
26 9075 16880 4700 21580 21580
27 9400 17490 4700 22190 22190
28 9725 18090 4700 22790 22790
29 10050 18700 4700 23400 23400
30 10375 19300 4700 24000 24000
SI-I 10700 19910 4700 24610 24610
SI-II 11025 20510 4700 25210 25210
SI-III 11350 21120 4700 25820 25820
Fitment Table-19
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -3) + Grade Pay
Rs.5375-175-6600- Rs.8000 - 35000 + Rs.4900
250-8100-325-10700
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
1 5375 10000 4900 14900
2 5550 10330 4900 15230
3 5725 10650 4900 15550
4 5900 10980 4900 15880
5 6075 11300 4900 16200
6 6250 11630 4900 16530
7 6425 11960 4900 16860
8 6600 12280 4900 17180
9 6850 12750 4900 17650
10 7100 13210 4900 18110
11 7350 13680 4900 18580
12 7600 14140 4900 19040
13 7850 14610 4900 19510
14 8100 15070 4900 19970
15 8425 15680 4900 20580
16 8750 16280 4900 21180
17 9075 16880 4900 21780
18 9400 17490 4900 22390
19 9725 18090 4900 22990
20 10050 18700 4900 23600
21 10375 19300 4900 24200
22 10700 19910 4900 24810
SI-I 11025 20510 4900 25410
SI-II 11425 21260 4900 26160
SI-III 11825 22000 4900 26900
Fitment Table-20
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -3)+ Grade Pay
Rs.4300-90-4480- Rs.8000 - 35000 + Rs.5100
120-5200-175-6600-
250-8100-325-
11025
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
1 4300 8000 5100 13100
2 4390 8170 5100 13270
3 4480 8340 5100 13440
4 4600 8560 5100 13660
5 4720 8780 5100 13880
6 4840 9010 5100 14110
7 4960 9230 5100 14330
8 5080 9450 5100 14550
9 5200 9680 5100 14780
10 5375 10000 5100 15100
11 5550 10330 5100 15430
12 5725 10650 5100 15750
13 5900 10980 5100 16080
14 6075 11300 5100 16400
15 6250 11630 5100 16730
16 6425 11960 5100 17060
17 6600 12280 5100 17380
18 6850 12750 5100 17850
19 7100 13210 5100 18310
20 7350 13680 5100 18780
21 7600 14140 5100 19240
22 7850 14610 5100 19710
23 8100 15070 5100 20170
24 8425 15680 5100 20780
25 8750 16280 5100 21380
26 9075 16880 5100 21980
27 9400 17490 5100 22590
28 9725 18090 5100 23190
29 10050 18700 5100 23800
30 10375 19300 5100 24400
31 10700 19910 5100 25010
32 11025 20510 5100 25610
SI-I 11425 21260 5100 26360
SI-II 11825 22000 5100 27100
SI-III 12225 22740 5100 27840
Fitment Table-21
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -4)+ Grade Pay
Rs.4390-90-4480- Rs.12000 - 40000 + Rs.5400
120-5200-175-6600-
250-8100-325-
11025-400-11425
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay Total Pay With
in the in the Adhoc Fitment
pre- running pay [See 2.1.8
revised band (iv)]
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs)
1 4390 12000 5400 17400 17400
2 4480 12000 5400 17400 17450
3 4600 12000 5400 17400 17500
4 4720 12000 5400 17400 17550
5 4840 12000 5400 17400 17600
6 4960 12000 5400 17400 17650
7 5080 12000 5400 17400 17700
8 5200 12000 5400 17400 17750
9 5375 12000 5400 17400 17800
10 5550 12000 5400 17400 17850
11 5725 12000 5400 17400 17900
12 5900 12000 5400 17400 17950
13 6075 12000 5400 17400 18000
14 6250 12000 5400 17400 18050
15 6425 12000 5400 17400 18100
16 6600 12280 5400 17680 18150
17 6850 12750 5400 18150 18200
18 7100 13210 5400 18610 18610
19 7350 13680 5400 19080 19080
20 7600 14140 5400 19540 19540
21 7850 14610 5400 20010 20010
22 8100 15070 5400 20470 20470
23 8425 15680 5400 21080 21080
24 8750 16280 5400 21680 21680
25 9075 16880 5400 22280 22280
26 9400 17490 5400 22890 22890
27 9725 18090 5400 23490 23490
28 10050 18700 5400 24100 24100
29 10375 19300 5400 24700 24700
30 10700 19910 5400 25310 25310
31 11025 20510 5400 25910 25910
32 11425 21260 5400 26660 26660
33 11825 22000 5400 27400 27400
SI-I 12225 22740 5400 28140 28140
SI-II 12625 23490 5400 28890 28890
SI-III 13025 24230 5400 29630 29630
Fitment Table-22
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -4)+ Grade Pay
Rs.5725-175-6600- Rs.12000 - 40000 + Rs.5900
250-8100-325-
11025-400-11825
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay Total Pay With
in the in the Adhoc Fitment
pre- running pay [See 2.1.8
revised band (iv)]
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs)
1 5725 12000 5900 17900 17900
2 5900 12000 5900 17900 17990
3 6075 12000 5900 17900 18080
4 6250 12000 5900 17900 18170
5 6425 12000 5900 17900 18260
6 6600 12280 5900 18180 18350
7 6850 12750 5900 18650 18650
8 7100 13210 5900 19110 19110
9 7350 13680 5900 19580 19580
10 7600 14140 5900 20040 20040
11 7850 14610 5900 20510 20510
12 8100 15070 5900 20970 20970
13 8425 15680 5900 21580 21580
14 8750 16280 5900 22180 22180
15 9075 16880 5900 22780 22780
16 9400 17490 5900 23390 23390
17 9725 18090 5900 23990 23990
18 10050 18700 5900 24600 24600
19 10375 19300 5900 25200 25200
20 10700 19910 5900 25810 25810
21 11025 20510 5900 26410 26410
22 11425 21260 5900 27160 27160
23 11825 22000 5900 27900 27900
SI-I 12225 22740 5900 28640 28640
SI-II 12625 23490 5900 29390 29390
SI-III 13025 24230 5900 30130 30130
Fitment Table-23
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -4) + Grade Pay
Rs.6600-250-8100- Rs.12000 - 40000 + Rs.6100
325-11025-400-
12625
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
Fitment Table-24
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -4)+ Grade Pay
Rs.8100-325-11025- Rs.12000 - 40000 + Rs.6300
400-13025
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
Fitment Table-25
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -4)+ Grade Pay
Rs.8750-325-11025- Rs.12000 - 40000 + Rs.6400
400-13825
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
Fitment Table-27
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -4)+ Grade Pay
Rs.9725-325-11025- Rs.12000 - 40000 + Rs.7200
400-14625-475-
15100
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
Fitment Table-28
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay
in the in the
pre- running pay
revised band
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
Fitment Table-30
Pre-revised Scale - Revised Pay Band (PB -5) + Grade Pay
Rs.11025-400- Rs.26000 - 45000 + Rs.8700
14625-475-17000
Sl. No. Basic Pay Revised pay Grade Pay Total Pay Total Pay With
in the in the Adhoc Fitment
pre- running pay [See 2.1.8
revised band (iv)]
scale
(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs)
-------------------------------
Employee’s signature/date
----------------------------------
Assessing Officer’s signature/date
------------------------------------
Reviewing Officer’s signature/date
------------------------------
Accepting Officer’s signature/date
IBOP Evaluation Form for Administrative Assistants in Pay Band 2
Please rate the employee on a 1 to 10 scale on the following
criteria
10 - Best Grade 1 - Lowest Grade
Sl. Attribute Grade Weightage Score
No. 1 – 10
1 Punctuality/Regularity 10%
2 Dependability/Reliability 10%
3 Integrity 20%
4 Motivation level 10%
5 Capacity to work hard 10%
6 Communication skill 5%
7 Interpersonal skill 5%
8 Multifunctional skill 10%
9 Knowledge of job and 10%
procedure
10 Other factors 10%
TOTAL 100%
-------------------------------
Employee’s signature/date
----------------------------------
Assessing Officer’s signature/date
------------------------------------
Reviewing Officer’s signature/date
------------------------------
Accepting Officer’s signature/date
IBOP Evaluation Form for Police Constables in Pay Band 2
Please rate the employee on a 1 to 10 scale on the following
criteria
10 - Best Grade 1 - Lowest Grade
Sl. Attribute Grade Weightage Score
No. 1 – 10
1 Dependability 10%
2 Service orientation 10%
3 Integrity 20%
4 Motivation/pride in work 10%
5 Physical fitness 10%
6 Interpersonal 10%
relationship
7 Multiskilling abilities 10%
8 Knowledge of job skill 10%
acquired in training
9 Other factors 10%
TOTAL 100%
-------------------------------
Employee’s signature/date
----------------------------------
Assessing Officer’s signature/date
------------------------------------
Reviewing Officer’s signature/date
------------------------------
Accepting Officer’s signature/date
Annex 3.1
Categories for Fixed TA
1. Forest Department Forest Guard – up to Dy. Ranger
2. Social Welfare CDPOs, Supervisors, Field Investigators
Department
3. Excise Department Constable to Inspector
4. Labour Department Labour Officer, Labour inspector, Medical Inspector
5. Food & Civil Supplies Inspector , Sub Inspector F&CS
Department
6. Education Adult Education supervisors
Department
7. Health and Family Leprosy Injector, Leprosy Social Worker, Sanitary
Welfare Department Inspector, ANM/ GNM in Sub Centres, LHV etc. and all
such categories in Health department where job
requires extensive touring for inspections, visits etc.
Food Inspectors
8. Fisheries Assistant fishery officer, fishery demonstrator.
Department
9. Veterinary Supervisory VFA, Livestock inspector, poultry inspector.
Department
10. Planning & Statistical Inspector etc.
Development
Department
11. Public Works Sectional Assistants, Sub Engineer I and II, Junior
Department Engineers etc.
b) Police Station
c) District
d) State
Higher
Secondary
(Science)
Degree
b) Written
P I N C O D E
19. Permanent Address of Applicant:
P I N C O D E
DECLARATION
Place: ___________________
Introduction
1.2 The Assam Pay Commission, 2008 has submitted its report in nearly sixteen
months time and its recommendations covered a large number of issues relating
not only to new pay structure, allowances and pension related matters but also
issues relating to leave matters, reorganisation of services and specific issues
relating to different departments. The Committee examined these
recommendations in detail. The Committee also examined the revised pay
structure as decided by the Government of India on the basis of the
recommendations of 6th Central Pay Commission in 2008. The expectations of
the State Government employees for an early revision of pay in the state as well
as the financial resources of the State Government were also taken into account.
The Committee held total 12 sittings during the period. The mandate given to
the Committee did not provide for inviting representations/ memoranda from
employee associations. However, various associations have suo moto submitted
21 memoranda to the Committee. The Committee did not take them into
cognizance in view of the mandate of the Committee. Further, the Committee
did not give any hearing to those associations.
1.3 The Committee examined in depth the recommendations of the Assam Pay
Commission, 2008 regarding new pay structure in the light of revised pay
structure as adopted by the Government of India. It is seen that the Commission
has recommended a new system of running Pay Bands and Grade Pay. The basic
pay drawn as on 1/1/2006 on the existing pay scales is multiplied by a factor of
1.86 to derive pay in the running pay band in same way as in Government of
India. The Grade Pay for each Pay Band is kept within the same limits as that in
Government of India. A comparative statement regarding new pay structure is
given below:
Table 1
(In Rupees)
1.4 It is seen from the table that the recommendations of the Commission
regarding pay structure of the Class IV employees is better than that of
Government of India whereas it is exactly same in case of Class III employees.
1.6 Secondly, in case of officers at the senior levels, it is important to give Grade
Pay at par with corresponding posts in Government of India as they have to
interact almost on daily basis with officers of various departments, paramilitary
forces etc. For example, an APS Junior officer posted as DySP/ SDPO needs to
interact with officers of equivalent ranks in Army/ CRPF. As the Grade Pay
determines the relative status, it is important to give them similar Grade Pay as
given to corresponding posts in CRPF etc. to ensure morale among our officers.
Application of 40% formula across the board shall result in lower Grade Pay for
the higher officials than that of officers in Central Government. Moreover, in the
era of globalisation and liberalisation, it is important to attract best talent for the
higher echelons of administration which necessitates removal of earlier
distortions. All these factors need to be taken into consideration for the
determination of Grade Pay. Thus, the Committee is of the view that mechanical
application of 40% formula to derive Grade Pay shall not serve the purpose.
Suitable modifications are required therein for functional efficiency. The
Committee also notes that minimum to maximum salary ratio as decided
by the Assam Pay Commission, 2008 is 1:9.38 compared to 1:12 as
decided by the Government of India. Hence, the Committee observes that
higher posts have not been given any undue pay hike. After considering all the
relevant factors, the Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Assam
Pay Commission, 2008 regarding basic pay structure comprising of running Pay
Bands and Grade Pay.
1.7 The Committee is of the view that it is necessary to classify services for
administrative convenience and functional requirement. The Committee suggests
that in the new pay structure, various services should be classified in ‘Group A’,
‘Group B’, ‘Group C’ and ‘Group D’ as prevalent in Government of India. The
new classification may be done on the basis of Grade Pay as Grade Pay indicates
the relative position of a particular post in the hierarchy. The new classification
of services may be as follows:
Table 2
1.10 In Para 2.2.20 of the report, the Commission has given deep consideration
to the practical difficulties in implementation of IBOP because of various reasons
like large number of employees under the control of some Assessing Officers,
increased workload in the months of February and March on account of Financial
year ending, increased paper work, difficulties in open, face to face assessment
due to hierarchical structure in the Government etc. It is also apprehended that
it may be difficult or it may involve delay in getting the 2% variable increment
under IBOP in case of many employees, particularly those in the lower rungs of
hierarchy. The Committee is of the view that although financial outgo will be less
in IBOP, there are teething administrative problems in it’s implementation.
Nevertheless, the Committee appreciates the fact that some part of
remuneration should be variable on the basis of performance.
1.13 The Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Commission with
one modification. The Committee suggests that maximum ceiling of Rs 4000 as
given in Point 2 of Para 3.10 may be enhanced to Rs 4800 which would be a
proportionate amount in comparison with prescribed ceiling of Rs. 6000 and Rs.
4000 in Point 1 and 3 respectively. Accordingly, the Committee suggests that
HRA may be given at the following rates:
Table 4
1.16 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission with
few modifications. The Committee suggests the rates of Daily Allowance as
follows:
Table 5
(In Rs.)
1.17 The Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Commission with
one modification. The Committee suggests that the Government may entrust
Personnel department with the responsibility of identifying categories of
employees who are likely to be exposed to hazards and formulating a
comprehensive risk insurance scheme for them. Till the time such scheme is put
in place, as an interim measure, hazard allowance may continue to be paid at
the present rate.
1.18 The Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Commission with
one modification. The Committee suggests that existing categories of employees
who are presently eligible for Fixed TA may continue to get fixed TA at enhanced
rates as recommended by the Commission but detailed examination is necessary
regarding additional categories recommended for Fixed TA. The Committee
suggests that the Government may entrust Finance department with
responsibility of examining the propriety of extending the benefit of Fixed TA to
additional categories on merit of each case and based on detailed justification as
submitted by the concerned department.
Conveyance Allowance (Para 3.36)
Journey on Tour
1.20 The Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Commission with
few modifications. The Committee suggests that all officers in receipt of Grade
Pay of Rs. 5400 and above and drawing minimum basic pay of Rs. 24000 may
be entitled for journey by air. This is necessary in order to ensure that no
categories of employees who are presently entitled to journey by air are
deprived of this facility and also to provide this facility to senior employees in
various posts. The Committee is of the view that no separate provision is
required for journey between Guwahati and Silchar and the aforesaid criterion
may be applied for the same. The Committee also suggests that relevant
provisions of Office Memoranda as issued by the Government earlier should also
be incorporated while framing the rules.
1.21 The Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Commission. The
Committee also suggests that officers in the Senior Grade be allowed to hire a
vehicle for official journeys by road within or outside the state. The entitlement
for journey by train as per Grade of officers may be as follows:
Table 6
Some trains like Rajdhani, Shatabdi etc. do not have Non-AC sleeper classes.
Finance Department may issue appropriate Office Memorandum accordingly.
1.22 The Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Commission. The
Committee also suggests that Travelling Allowance for journey on transfer be
given at the same rate as applicable for normal TA. TA for journey as per
entitlement should be admissible for all members of the family subject to the
maximum of actual fares paid. Definition of family should cover spouse,
dependent children and dependent parents.
Kit and Dhobi Allowance (Health and Family Welfare Department) (Para
3.48)
1.25 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission with
few modifications. The Committee suggests that present system of granting
Compensatory Allowance to the police personnel up to the rank of Inspector and
Special Compensatory Allowance to various posts in Fire Service Department
may continue. Compensatory Allowance may be given at the rate of 5% of basic
pay with a ceiling of Rs.750. The existing rates of Special Compensatory
Allowance may be doubled. Commando Allowance may be given at the rate of
15% of basic pay with a ceiling of Rs. 2500.
Jail, Home Guards and Civil Defence, Forest and Excise Department
(Para 3.52)
1.27 The Committee suggests that Training Allowance may be given at the rate
of 15% of basic pay with a ceiling of Rs.3000 to all the Instructional and
Directorial staff of all the premiere state level training institutes of all the
departments such as Police Training College, Basic Training College (BTC),
Recruiter’s Training School (RTS), Central Training Institute (under DGCD&HG)
under Home department, Survey and Settlement School under Revenue
Department etc.
1.29 It is observed that the doctors are already getting Rural Area Incentive
under NRHM. Therefore, the Committee is of the view that till the continuation of
incentive under NRHM, separate provision for Rural Area Incentive is not
necessary. Recommendation of the Commission regarding this incentive may be
considered in due course once the incentive under NRHM is discontinued.
Disability and Child Care Allowance (Para 3.59)
1.31 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission. The
Committee suggests that detail guidelines regarding this allowance as
operational in Government of India be referred to while framing the rules.
1.33 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission with
the following modifications:
1.34 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission with
the following modifications:
1.35 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission with
few modifications. The Committee suggests that LTC may be given to an
employee after completion of ten years of service once during the entire period
of service. Reimbursement of actual travelling expenses may be made subject to
maximum of entitlement on journey by train irrespective of mode of actual
travel.
1.36 The Committee suggests that the Government may entrust Health and
Family Welfare Department with the responsibility of examining the
recommendations of the Commission regarding medical facilities and benefits in
detail and submit its report to the Finance department with detailed justification.
In the meantime, existing provisions may continue.
1.37 The Committee suggests the enhanced insurance coverage and monthly
rate of subscription as follows:
Table 7
1.40 The Committee suggests that the Government may entrust Administrative
Reforms and Training Department with the responsibility of examining the
recommendations of the Commission regarding advance increments for acquiring
higher academic qualification in detail. In the meantime, existing provisions may
continue.
1.41 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission with
the following modifications:
1.42 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission with
the following modifications:
1. Total 12 Casual Leaves may be allowed for all the employees of the State
Government.
2. Existing provisions regarding Earned Leave and Half Pay Leave may
continue with only one modification. Accumulation and encashment of
Earned Leave for all the employees of vacation departments may be
allowed up to 150 days as recommended by the Commission.
3. The Government may entrust Finance Department with the responsibility
of examining the recommendations regarding Special Study Leave. In the
meantime, existing provisions regarding Study Leave may continue to be
applied to the academic staff.
4. For smooth functioning of the administration, the existing provision of
Maternity Leave of 135 days may remain unchanged. Maternity leave may
be combined with leave of any other kind as due up to 45 days in addition
to 135 days.
5. Since leave of other kinds as due are available to male employees, the
Committee is not in favour of introduction of Paternity Leave.
1.44 The Committee suggests that the Government may entrust Administrative
Reforms and Training Department with the responsibility of examining the
recommendations of the Commission regarding two levels of Directorates in
detail. In the meantime, existing provisions may continue. The Committee
agrees with the recommendation of the Commission regarding closing down
some directorates which have outlived their utility, as mentioned in the
Commissions’ report, after due examination.
1.46 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission. The
Government may entrust Planning and Development Department and other
departments as mentioned in the report with the responsibility of examining the
recommendation in detail and formulate guidelines regarding the same.
1.47 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission with
the following modifications:
1.49 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission. The
Government may entrust Personnel Department with the responsibility of
formulating detailed guidelines regarding regular office inspections and other
issues as mentioned in the report and also to come out with detailed action plan
regarding Service Rules. Respective departments may also take necessary action
to update Service Rules of their employees at the earliest. Service Rules for the
posts like Statistical Officer, Information Officer etc. may be formulated by the
respective parent departments while the details of service matters like career
progression etc. may be decided by the line department to which the officer is
deputed. Provisions like minimum graduate qualification; computer literacy etc.
may also be incorporated in the Service Rules depending on functional
requirement/ availability of sufficient number of eligible candidates.
1.51 The Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Commission. The
Government may entrust Personnel Department with the responsibility of
examining the recommendations and come out with a comprehensive action plan
for implementation of the same. Respective departments may also incorporate
relevant provisions in the Service Rules of the employees.
1.52 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission. The
respective departments may undertake a comprehensive review of existing
promotion policies and consider a certain percentage as the limit beyond which
the members of subordinate services will not be promoted.
1.53 The Government may entrust Personnel Department with the responsibility
of examining the model application form as given at Annex 8.1 of the
Commission’s report and suggest necessary changes therein to make it suitable
for using it in recruitment process in future. For example, column on income
level of the family of the candidate may be added to the same.
1.54 The Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Commission. The
Government may entrust IT and ART Departments with the responsibility of
formulating a comprehensive action plan for implementation of the same.
1.55 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission with
the following modifications:
1.57 The Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Commission with the
following modifications:
General recommendations
1.60 The Committee agrees with the general recommendations with the
following modifications:
1.61 The Committee has noted the observations of the Commission with respect
to the Officers and Servants of the Gauhati High Court.
Agriculture Department
1.62 The Committee agrees with the recommendations with the following
modifications:
1.63 The Committee suggests that the department may examine the feasibility
of the recommendation regarding minimum higher secondary qualification for
the posts of VFA and allied services.
1.64 The Committee suggests that the department may examine the feasibility
of the recommendations and submit a proposal to the Finance department with
detailed justification in the light of Para 1.59 of this Committees’ report.
Cooperation Department
1.65 The Committee suggests that the department may examine the feasibility
of the recommendations and submit a proposal to the Finance department with
detailed justification in the light of Para 1.59 of this Committees’ report. The
Committee has separately given its views regarding Fixed TA for new categories.
Culture
1.66 The Committee suggests that the department may examine the feasibility
of the recommendations and submit a proposal to the Finance department with
detailed justification taking into account educational qualification and other
aspects.
Archaeology
1.67 The Committee suggests that the department may examine the feasibility
of the recommendation and submit a proposal to the Finance department with
detailed justification in the light of Para 1.59 of this Committees’ report.
Library Services
1.68 The Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Commission. The
Committee suggests that the department may examine the feasibility of the
recommendation regarding pay of Librarians with reference to the Commission’s
recommendation in Chapter 7 and in consultation with AR&T department and
Personnel department and submit a proposal to the Finance department with
detailed justification in the light of Para 1.59 of this Committees’ report.
Typists
1.69 The Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Commission
regarding one avenue of promotion for any cadre of employees. The Committee
also agrees with the recommendation that there should be 10% quota for Class
IV cadre for promotion to the cadre of typists. The Committee suggests that the
quota for promotion from typists to JAA/LDA should be 35% because at present
it is 30% and in the event of discontinuance of 5% promotion quota from
present Class IV to JAA/ LDA cadre, this quota may be added to the present
promotion quota of 30%. As stated earlier, the Committee is not in favour of
complete stoppage of recruitment to posts in the cadres of typists and the
present Class IV in view of the present functional requirement. Consequently,
the Committee is also not in favour of giving Terminal Pay to the present
incumbents. The Committee suggests that computer literacy should be
considered necessary for recruitment of typists in future.
Drivers
1.70 The Committee agrees with the recommendations with few modifications.
The Committee is of the view that Driver’s Commuting Allowance should not be
given to those drivers who reside within the campus of Assam Bhavan. Similarly,
within Assam, only those drivers may be entitled to this allowance who need to
travel more than 1 KM to attend duty. Concerned officer/ P.S. to Minister may
certify about the distance. Regarding the recommendation with respect to airport
pick up duty, the Committee suggests that the facility of half DA may be
extended to concerned employees in all such places within Assam as well. This
allowance should be in lieu of existing allowance, if any.
Class IV
1.71 The Committee agrees with the recommendations. 10% quota for
promotion to typists shall be subject to implementation of the Commissions’
recommendation regarding discontinuance of promotion from existing Class IV to
cadre of JAA/LDA. GAD/SAD may amend Service Rules accordingly.
Education Department
Excise Department
Forest Department
Finance Department
Fisheries Department
1.77 Detailed justification for amalgamating the post of ADFDO and allied posts
in the cadre of DFDO and for enhancing Grade Pay of the posts of SDFDO and
DFDO is not found in the report. Secondly, post of ADFDO and allied posts are
Class II posts at present and their amalgamation with post of DFDO, which is
Class I post, would disturb the existing relativity vis-a-vis the posts of Fishery
Extension Officer (Degree holders) and SDFDO. The post of ADFDO and allied
posts are presently in the pay scale of Rs. 5375-10700 whereas the post of FEO
and SDFDO are presently in the higher scale of Rs. 4390-11425. The proposed
amalgamation shall result in ADFDO and allied posts getting higher Grade Pay
than the posts of FEO and SDFDO which is an anomaly. In view of the above,
the Committee is not in favour of amalgamation of post of ADFDO and allied
posts in the cadre of DFDO as recommended by the Commission. The Committee
also suggests that posts of ADFDO and allied posts, SDFDO and DFDO should be
given Grade Pay corresponding to their existing pay scales.
1.78 The department may examine the recommendations on merit of each case
and submit a proposal to the Finance department with detailed justification in
the light of Para 1.59 of this Committees’ report.
Home Department
1.83 The Committee is of the view that the Government may consider abolition
of this office in view of the changed circumstances and in accordance with the
Commissions’ recommendation regarding some other directorates like State
Lotteries etc.
Judicial Department
1.86 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission. The
Committee has separately given its views regarding fixed TA for new categories.
Legislature Department
Labour Department
1.95 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission with
one modification. The Committee observes that matters related to Gaonburha do
not fall within the Terms of Reference of the Commission.
1.96 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission. The
department may examine feasibility of the recommendations and submit a
proposal to the Finance department with detailed justification in the light of Para
1.59 of this Committees’ report.
1.98 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission with
one modification. The department may examine feasibility of the various
recommendations and submit a proposal to the Finance department with
detailed justification in the light of Para 1.59 of this Committees’ report. As
stated earlier, Training Allowance for Superintendant and Instructors of the
Training Institute may be given at the rate of 15% of basic pay with ceiling of
Rs. 3000.
Transport Department
Tourism Department
1.102 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission. The
department may examine feasibility of the recommendation regarding
Receptionists and initiate action.
WPTBC Department
1.104 The Committee agrees with the recommendations of the Commission. The
department may examine feasibility of the recommendation regarding post of
Computor and submit a proposal to the Finance department with detailed
justification in the light of Para 1.59 of this Committees’ report.
Works Departments
1.105 The concerned department may examine feasibility of the various
recommendations regarding equal Grade Pay for Turner and allied posts,
individual cases etc. on the merit of each case and submit a proposal to the
Finance department with detailed justification in the light of Para 1.59 of this
Committees’ report.
Acknowledgement
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
FINANCE (PAY RESEARCH UNIT) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR :::::: GUWAHATI-6
The Committee will concretize the action points and submit them to the
Government by 30th November, 2009 for placing the same before the Cabinet for
approval.
By Order etc..,