Scribd
Upload
492 views2 pages

Self and Peer Evaluation of Group Project

The document summarizes a group project evaluation for a project on developing a retention strategy for an eatery's employees. In a self-evaluation, the student rated themselves highly in various criteria such as participation, cooperation, interest, and financial contribution. Peer evaluations from other group members also rated the student highly, giving them a score of 5 out of 5 for most criteria. The evaluations will be used to assign a grade for the group project.

Uploaded by

Noby Ann Vargas Lobete
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
492 views2 pages

Self and Peer Evaluation of Group Project

The document summarizes a group project evaluation for a project on developing a retention strategy for an eatery's employees. In a self-evaluation, the student rated themselves highly in various criteria such as participation, cooperation, interest, and financial contribution. Peer evaluations from other group members also rated the student highly, giving them a score of 5 out of 5 for most criteria. The evaluations will be used to assign a grade for the group project.

Uploaded by

Noby Ann Vargas Lobete
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Self and Peer Evaluation of Group Project

RESEARCH 3
Title: LET’S TALK! : A Retention Strategy To Address High Rate Of Employee Turnover In Tuling's Eatery

Please assess the work of you and your colleagues by using the following criteria. We will consider your feedback in assigning the grade for the
project. Please try to be as honest and fair as possible in your assessment.

5 = Excellent work; was crucial component to group’s success


4 = Very strong work; contributed significantly to group
3 = Sufficient effort; contributed adequately to group
2 = Insufficient effort; met minimal standards of group
1 = Little or weak effort; was detrimental to group

SELF Evaluation (Name: Noby Ann V. Lobete ):


__4__ Participation in developing ideas and planning project
__4___ Willingness to discuss the ideas of others
__4___ Cooperation with other group members
__4__ Interest and enthusiasm in project
__4__ Participation in leading/facilitating discussion
__4__ Ease and familiarity with discussion material
__4__Contributes financially

PEER Evaluation
Failma, Karylle Fanugao, Faulve, Kara Jumuad, Lasquite, Lonzaga, Nikko Name of Group Name of Group Name of Group
Glinka Justine Thea Khaeigh Earl member member member

Participation in developing ideas and 5 5 5 5 5 5


planning project
Willingness to discuss the ideas of 5 5 5 5 5 5
others
Cooperation with other group 5 5 5 5 5 5
members

Interest and enthusiasm in project 5 5 5 5 5 5


Contributes Financially 5 5 5 5 5 5
Participation in group field work 5 5 5 5 5 5
activities( interview, industry
interview)
Shows concern and effort for the 5 5 5 5 5 5
completion of the study

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy