Scribd
Upload
31 views3 pages

College of Criminal Justice

The document provides evaluation criteria for interns completing an internship with the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) Escort Division in the Philippines. It outlines a 5-point rating scale to evaluate interns on 7 criteria: punctuality, knowledge, quality of work, responsibility, following directions, appearance, and ethics. For each criterion, the intern is given a score from 1-20 based on their demonstrated performance. The intern and evaluator then sign to confirm the evaluation was properly discussed and agreed upon.

Uploaded by

Daryl Gordoncillo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
31 views3 pages

College of Criminal Justice

The document provides evaluation criteria for interns completing an internship with the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) Escort Division in the Philippines. It outlines a 5-point rating scale to evaluate interns on 7 criteria: punctuality, knowledge, quality of work, responsibility, following directions, appearance, and ethics. For each criterion, the intern is given a score from 1-20 based on their demonstrated performance. The intern and evaluator then sign to confirm the evaluation was properly discussed and agreed upon.

Uploaded by

Daryl Gordoncillo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION

PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MUNTINLUPA


College of Criminal Justice
Universty Road, Brgy. Poblacion, Muntinlupa City

GORDONCILLO, DARYL G.
Name of Criminology Intern: ___________________________________________________________
(Last Name) (First Name) (MI)
Name of Agencies/Assignment:

Bureau of Jail Management and Penology(BJMP) Escort Division


_______________ ___________________ _______________________________
(Name of Agencies Concerned) (Unit/Div/Sec Assigned)

Period Covered: ___________________________________

Parameters: Hereunder is the criteria in evaluating the performance of OJT Student/Intern.

I. Rating System

Scale Description Qualitative Equivalence


5: 96 - 100 Performance is Exceptional, almost always Excellent/Outstanding (E/O)
exceeds requirements.
4: 88 - 95 Performance often excessed requirements Very Satisfactory (VS)
3: 81 - 87 Performance meets requirements Satisfactory (S)
2: 75 - 80 Performance needs more improvement Fair (F)
1: 70 -74 Performance is below expected level Needs Improvement (NI)

II. Criterions: (Please put only 1 mark that suit into the interns performance).

A. Punctuality and Attendance (10 pts) Put a Mark


(10) Perfect attendance
(8) Rarely absent or late
(6) Punctual and average attendance
(4) Frequently absent or late
(2) Often times absent or late

B. Knowledge of Work (15 pts)


(15) Has a complete and thorough knowledge of work
(14) Rarely needs instructions and assistance
(12) Needs instructions and assistance
(8) Regularly needs instructions and assistance
(4) Needs more instruction

C. Quality of Works (10 pts)


(10) Complete and accurate in all details
(8) Rarely commits error
(6) Fairly good and seldom commits error
(4) Requires occasional practice
(2) Very careless and often time commits error

D. Acceptance of Responsibilities (10 pts)


(10) Consistently acts in a responsible manner
(8) Shows marked interest in his/her work
(6) Display normal interest in his/her work
(4) Has a little interest in his/her work
(2) Manifest a very low regard for his/her work

E. Acceptance of Direction (20 pts)


(20) Carry out direction to the best of his/her ability
(16) Shows keen interest in accepting direction
(12) Accepts direction and carries out with minimum correction
(8) Needs constantly prodding and display passive attitude
(4) Shows inability to carry out direction.

F. Personal Appearance and Bearing (15 pts)


(15) Always clean, neat, well-groomed and always in prescribe attire
(14) Rarely seen in proper attire, clean and well-groomed
(12) Fairly good bearing
(8) Hardly observes good grooming
(4) Needs more improvements on his/her appearance

G. Moral Values and Ethical Standards (20 pts)


(20) Strictly abides to the Code of Ethics
(16) Very upright to follow the rules
(12) Fairly violate the code of conduct
(8) Hardly observes the code of conduct
(4) Needs training and re-orientation on moral values and ethics

Total Score:

Evaluated by:

Name: _______________________________________________________________________________

(Last Name) (First Name) (MI)

Designation: ________________________________

Signature : _______________________________
Date : _______________________________

Conformed: The undersigned personally agree that the evaluation above was properly discussed to me
by the evaluator and that I was satisfied of the rating given to me with all grounds and without any tint
of doubt, dissatisfaction and disagreement.

____________________________________________
(Intern’s Signature over Printed Name)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy