Comparison of Performance Characterization in 2X2, 3X3 and 4X4 Array Antennas
Comparison of Performance Characterization in 2X2, 3X3 and 4X4 Array Antennas
Abstract:
The best way of gain enhancement can be characterization of these antennas with respect to
obtained is from the array models, but there are antenna output parameters [5-8].
some problems associated with array antennas.
The electromagnetic band gap materials are using
Mutual coupling losses, element spacing and
by different people in their work for designing the
design complexity are major concerns in the
antennas to enhance the gain band with product.
array antennas. The present paper deals with
EBG structures are generally known as photonic
the performance characterization among the
band gap structures which associated with the area
2X2, 3X3, 4X4 array antennas. Rectangular
of optics. Generally EBG is a periodic structure
patch array models are constructed and
that forbids the propagation of electromagnetic
simulated using Ansoft HFSS. Antenna output
surface waves with in a particular frequency band
parameters and antenna performance
called band gap. EBG also permits additional
characteristics are presented in this current
control of the behavior of electromagnetic waves in
work.
a different way from conventional guiding or
filtering structures. EBG having a capability to
Keywords: Performance Characterization,
provide a simple and efficient solution for
Array Antenna, Gain Enhancement.
problems of surface and leaky waves. The
performance of antennas and input impedance
I. Introduction: matching characteristics can be improved by EBG
The microstrip patch antennas are using in number structures [9-10].
of applications like in mobile communications,
A comparative study is done on different types of
satellite communication, GPS applications,
arrays like 2*2, 3*3, 4*4 antenna arrays and their
wireless communication etc. The main problem
performance characteristics presented and an
associated with the micro strip patch antenna
analytical study is done by considering
includes Low efficiency, High quality factor, Low
performance of all the structures. Figure (1) shows
power handling capacity, Poor polarization purity.
the different antenna array models designed and
But advantages include Low profile, Compact size,
generated by Ansoft HFSS. The systematic
Planer configuration, Low weight, Easy to fabricate
evaluation is done by considering the planar array
[1-4]. models and all the output characteristics are
The performance of micro strip antenna mainly presented based on the simulation results.
depends on the substrate material, dimension of
A typical 2X2, 3X3 and 4X4 patch antenna arrays
antenna, feeding technique. The array of patch
with finite ground planes are shown in figure (1),
elements is used instead of single patch to enhance
(2) and (3). The antenna dimension of 70X70mm is
the gain and the band width. By controlling the
used for all the models except the patch dimension
dimension of the antenna by using slot models and
and spacing between them.
by choosing proper dielectric constant with suitable
substrate will provide some improvement in band
width. This paper mainly focuses on different types
of array antennas and the performance
2091 | P a g e
E.Suneel,B.Prabhakararao,B.T.P.Madhav,S.A.R.Teja,V.V.Vamsi Krishna, Shankar Acharya / International
Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622
www.ijera.com
Vol. 1, Issue 4, pp.2091-2095
The return loss is same for 2x2, 3x3 and 4x4 array
patch antennas working at 2.6 GHz. The bandwidth
and gain are showing some incremented values
when array size is increasing. The bandwidth
Fig (1) 2X2 Rectangular Array Patch enhancement of 0.01% is observed when we go
from 2x2 to 4x4. The main theme of going for
array models is for getting better gain. The
simulation results showing the gain is increasing if
array elements are increasing.
Table (2a), (2b), (2c) Antenna additional parameters and field data for three models
2093 | P a g e
E.Suneel,B.Prabhakararao,B.T.P.Madhav,S.A.R.Teja,V.V.Vamsi Krishna, Shankar Acharya / International
Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622
www.ijera.com
Vol. 1, Issue 4, pp.2091-2095
Figure (4) shows the gain curve for all the three [2] Balh IJ and Bhartia P (1980) Microstrip
models. From the simulation results it is clear that antennas. Artech house, Norwood, MA.
the gain enhancement can be done by increasing
number of patch elements. The peak directivity and [3]. Balanis CA (1997) Antenna theory, John Wiley
peak gain is almost doubled when patch elements & Sons, Inc.
increases from 4 to 16 with 2x2, 3x3 and 4x4 array.
The radiation efficiency is showing the same value [4] K.F.Lee and W.Chen, ―Advances in
for all three cases but the incident and accepted microstrip and Printed antennas, Wiley,
powers are different for each case. Left hand Newyork,1997, pp.144-147.
circular polarization and right hand circular [5] Arun K Bhattacharayya, ―Phased Array
polarization values can be collected from the Antennas‖, Wiley series in Microwave and Optical
maximum field data results. Engineering, Chapter 5.
As per the power consumption is concerned the [6]. K.L.Wong, ―Compact and Broadband
2x2 array model consumes less power compared to Microstrip Antennas, John Wiley & sons, Text
other models and 4x4 consumes more power. The Book
element spacing is very nearer in the case of 4x4
array patch which leads to mutual coupling losses [7].R.B.Waterhouse, et.al, Broadband printed
and in the case of 2x2 array the mutual coupling is millimeterwave Antenna, IEEE Trans. AP –
less. 51, No.9, Sep 2003,pp 2492- 2495.
2094 | P a g e
E.Suneel,B.Prabhakararao,B.T.P.Madhav,S.A.R.Teja,V.V.Vamsi Krishna, Shankar Acharya / International
Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622
www.ijera.com
Vol. 1, Issue 4, pp.2091-2095
2095 | P a g e