Content Math
Content Math
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
I. Title Page 1
III. Proceedings
a. Engage
b. Explore
c. Enrich
d. Extend
e. Evaluate
V. Personal Reflections
2|Page
3|Page
III. Proceedings
a. Engage
4|Page
Our first official group study was held on the university’s library which we know it
would be a perfect place for some misunderstandings we could just scan the books
there. As seen in the picture, our moderator Christopher asked us about the things we
have read beyond the topics that are assigned to us, and in which he had knew that
some of us didn’t understood portions of the topic. For some who did understand the
topic, the next proceeding will illustrate the collaborative brainstorming of ideas.
b. Explore
5|Page
In this part, as the moderator have known about the portions who did understood
our lesson, he raised questions to identify if we really did read and comprehended the
lesson. For some who is not quite sure, we made a collaborative discussion which it
c. Enrich
6|Page
d. Extend
7|Page
e. Evaluate
8|Page
IV. Answers to Exercises
Philippines Quantitative
e. IQ scores Ratio
10 | P a g e
3. The following tables shows the value in General Government Consumption
BAR GRAPH
11 | P a g e
General Government
General Government ConsumptiConsumption Expenditures
on Expenditure
(in US $) for the Philippines from
(in US $) for the Philippines from 2007-2016 2007-2016
2016
2016
2015
2015
2014
2014
2013 YEAR
2013
2012
2012
2011
2010
2011 $33926500000
$13867990000
YEARYear
10% 10%
2009
2010 $31993260000 $15384520000
10% 10%
2008
2009
$30054320000 $16598320000
2007
2008 10% 0 10% 0
000 000 000 00 000 0 00 00 00 00
2007
90 20 20 0
$29468210000
2 40$19403620000 100 100 200 600 000
9 045 3
10%00 7448 00 10% 705
6 2 3 32 65
38
67
50308 0 00 6598 0 00 9040030 $27117510000
0 $21744840000
1 0 7 110
0 0 009468 0 00 0005040 199 392
$1
9$0
1
20 $ 20
1
2$ 0
1
4 0 $10%1 0 10%$1 0
2 2
20 $ 60
2 $0 0
3 $3 $3
6 79 8 45 9 83 0 36 4 48 5 2 3
17 4 68 0 54 9 93 9 26
2 5
38 53 65 94 17 1
7 Consumption
9 0Expenditures
1 3
$1 $1 $1 $1 $2 $2 $2 $3 $3 $3
CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES
PIE CHART
LINE GRAPH
7. The Philippine Statistical Authority announced in 2015 that there were 42,036
barangays in the country. The largest barangay in terms of population size was
barangay 176 Caloocan City with 247 thousand persons. It was also followed by
12 | P a g e
Commonwealth in Quezon City (with 198,285 person) and Batasan Hills in
Quezon City (with 161, 409 persons). Twelve other barangays posted a
13 | P a g e
14 | P a g e
Barangays with More Than 100,000 Population:2015
300,000
250,000
200,000
No. of Population
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
6 th lls an as se ro n g rit 8 on an o b.
)
y 17 e al Hi hat yat Jo Is id a ci o pan S pi y 17 uz Ju T am (Po
n n l u n
ng
a
on
w sa bu Pa Sa n b C ly ga M
Sa g e
ra ta ag Sa Po Ho ran s on J os
a m a n a a
B m B Pi B P Sa
n
Co
Barangays
15 | P a g e
8. State the most appropriate type of graph (bar graph, pie chart, or time series graph)
a. The number of trees for five different varieties of trees found in a certain
c. The number of college students who walk, ride a private car, ride a bus, ride a
f. The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the Philippines from 1990 to the present
i. The amount of rainfall measured from different monitoring sites PAGASA from
16 | P a g e
j. The annual number of earthquakes in the world with seismic magnitude over
10. The entire series given below is the number of reported HIV cases in the Philippines
Comment on the trend of the reported number of HIV cases in the Philippines.
The time series graph shows the relationship between the year and the mean number of
cases of HIV that was reported in the Philippines through DOH Website which started
on year 1984 until 2016. As you can see as the year goes on, the mean number of
cases also increases. On year 1964 until 2000, the movement of the point is actually
indeterminate since the difference of the mean number of cases in each year are
actually not far from each other. As we study the graph, on year 2002 the mean number
17 | P a g e
of cases suddenly increases and as it reached the year 2004 it also suddenly
decreases. Starting from the year 2005, the graph movements are already clearly and
easy to identify since the mean number of cases are already high.
18 | P a g e