Plasma-Arc Technology For Ferroalloys, Part II: D.R. Macrae
Plasma-Arc Technology For Ferroalloys, Part II: D.R. Macrae
This paper, the second part of a series, updates the technology with an emphasis on
the selection of plasma-smelting furnaces ror the production of ferroalloys and on
related plasma applications for melting and heating.
The configurations of transferred and non-transferred arcs are reviewed, and the
trends in the design of plasma-arc reactor systems and plasma-processing tech-
nology are outlined. Current industrial plasma installations arc listed, and plasma
reactors for the production of ferroalloys are discussed in detail. The paper ends with
a list of over one-hundred publications.
22 INFACON 6
mentation common for the development and adoption of new process-
• may operate with fonrning slags es to take upwards of ten to twenty years. This is due (Q the
no energy loss through cooling or the electrodes inherent difficulties involved in the developmcnt of high-
no skilled repair required. temperature processes, the maturity of the entrenched tech-
The stated disadvantages are that there is a consumption of nology, and the substantial capital investment that is
the graphite eleclrode, and the insulation of the eleclrode required for new facilities. In addition, plasma processing
and roof seal is critical. has had this technological 'identity crisis', which has
It is inevitable that this spread of plasma technology to involved inappropriate applications and has been viewed as
less complex high-temperature applications and the domi- 'a solution looking for a problem'. Initially, inappropriate
nance of less complex plasma devices will continue. To applicitlions grew out of overly broad and ambitious expec-
paraphrase Albert Einstein, 'Plasma reactors should be tations for a new and 'glamorous' processing tool. Two
made as simple as possible but not too simple', or, in steel- highly visible current 'problems' for plasma processing are
makers' vemacular, 'KISS' - Keep It Simple. the increasing demands for cleaner and higher-quality met-
allurgical products, and the environmental demands in the
Trends in Plasma·processing Technology treatment of hazardous materials.
The major process trend has been the increasing develop-
ment of simple heating applications. Twenty years ago the Present Industrial Plasma Installations
high expectations for plasma technology included the most The present electrical capacity for the plasma-furnace pro-
complex of high-temperature chemical-reaction systems duct ion of ferrochromium and ferromanganese is about 100
such as the smelting of chromite are. Today, the greaterMW, as shown in Table U. In addition, there is commercial
market potential for repcated installations has emphasized capacity of about 25 MW for the melting of ferroalloy
the development of simple systems for maintaining the tem- revert fines, slags, and stainless-stecl dusts. There are indi-
perature of melts or providing an incremental energy input cations of a gradual growth in plasma-smelter capacity with
at high tcmperatures, for exam pic in continuous-casting the recent upgrade in 1989 of lhe MS&A ferrochromium
tundishes and in steelmaking-refining ladles. A sign of the smelter from 14 to 30 MW, and the proposed installation of
technical maturity of plasma technology has been the a 12 MW ferrochromium smclter at MacAlloy in
repeated installation by several vendors of the sallle devel- Charleslon, S. C. The SwedeChrollle planl 01" 48 MW has
opment. such as tundish melt heating. not been operating since 1990 owing to economic condi-
The widespread use of plasma-processing technology is lions. The processing of ferroalloy and stainless fines is
just beginning. In the field of pyrollletallurgy, il is quite established technology.
TABLE II
INDUSTRIAL PLASMA INSTALLATIONS FOR THE PRODUC.TION OF METALS AND ALLOYS
Process Feed Pnxluct System Power cilpilcity Stan-up Plant location Reference
Plasma cnlcible Crore Feer ASEAlMintek 14MW t983 Middelhurg Steel 15
smelting Crushed nnes (Upgraded from & Alloys.
141030 MW) t989 Krugenodllrp. SA 18
C, Feer 12MW 1997 South Carolina Research 22
concentrates IMacAlloy plant] AulhorilY. Charleston. S.c.
Plasma blast fumace Mn ore FcMn Acrosp:uiale 3 x 1.5 MW t984 SFPO. Buulugne-sur-Mer 27
smelling 8 x 1.5 MW 1986
Crorc FeCr SKF Plasm3- 4x6MW 1988 SwedeChromc. Malmo 24.25
Cmshcd fines chrome (IWO shafls) (molhballcd Sweden
in 1990)
Iron ore Fe Acro.<ipatialc 6 x 2.0MW 1987 LorfOlllc (HFRSU), 74
Lorraine
Reduction/melting Fcrmalloy FeMn FrcitaUVocsl 3MW 1983 Samancor. 30
crushed fines Alpine (Mimck) Meycnon.S.A.
Bughouse C,. i.Mo. SKF Plasma- 3,6MW 1986 ScanDusl. Landskrona. 48
fines Fe Dust Sweden
Crushed fine~ FeCrcharg Tetronics R&D 15MW 1988 Fcrbasa, Brazil 19
prm.'css slag fcec..l
AOD/EAF dust Cr.Ni. Mo Tetronics R&D 3MW t989 British Steel. 49a
ZnO Sheffield
EAF dUSf Zn. Pb,Cd Tctronics R&D 2MW 1989 Florida Steel, 66.67
Jackson. TN
EAFdust Zn. Pb. Cd Terlol1ics R&D 3MW t989 Nucor·Yal1lato, 66.67
Cr.l.wfords\lille. AR
Stainless dust Cr. Ni Tctrnnics R&D 7MW 199t Multiser\'e. haly 49b
EAF dust Cr. Ni. ZnQ I-Iollow-grnphitc IMW 1989 MinIck. S./\. 71
c;llhode (pilot)
EAF dllst Cr. Ni Hollow-graphite I.5MW 1990 Chiba Works. Kawasaki 50
l,:.llhodc (pilot)
AutOlnobi1e- PI Tctrtlllics R&D JMW 1984 Multi-Meteo 81
emissiun catalysl.~ 75 000 tr.oz.ly Anniston. AL
24 INFACON6
[erred-arc operations as compared with 95 per cent for
transferred-arc operations. The efficiency of transferred-arc,
graphite electrodes that are not water-cooled and have mini-
mal heat losses is nearly 100 per cent. It was also apparent
thal. although the reduction of iron oxide with hydrogen
and natural gas dictated a non-transferred design for the
heating of the reactant gases, a transferred arc to a bulk
melt could also be used for carbothennic reactions 4o .
In 1979, ASEA announced the ELRED process for the
production of iron using coal of non-metallurgical
grade 73a .b . The iron oxide fines were prereduced in a fluid-
ized bed. Final smelting reduction occurred in a d.c. furnace
with the arc transferred from a hollow graphite electrode to
the iron melt, which had a bottom anode connection. The
prereduced concentrate and char were fed through the hol-
low electrode to the arc/melt region, as shown in Figure
3 73c . The scale-up potential and relative simpljcity of the
ELRED process using a transferred-arc furnace had
eclipsed Bethlehem's programme to develop a plasma-
steelmaking process using a solid carbon reductant.
FIGURE 4. TClronics: Research & Development (TRD) sweeping-arc
Fin. chromlte feed plasma furnace at J 103 MW with gravity/roof particulate feeding for the
melting or fcrrochromium fincs l9 lllltilundish hcutill£K8.90
Feed
,
• Rotary
Cathoda Preheater
Hollow
a'.elrod.
1 rCOlumn
Flua g ....
~
Plasma
Zone
Anodlt Gas
FIGURE 3. ASEA hollow graphite -electrode reactor developed by Mintck
and MS&A up to 14 MW and 30 MW for the produclion or
= "-Inject ion
SWEDECHROME
r--- ./
Ferro- Ferro-
chromium chromium
Electric
FIGURE 7. Voest-Alpine (Freital) transferred-arc furnace using W;l\er-
32 % Power 45 %
cooled tungsten-cathode arc heaters for the melting of ferromanganese
fines 30 ""- 53 %
Samancor Metalloys ferromanganese plantJO based on the
Voest-Alpine transferred-arc design, shown in Figure 7 but Gas
....-
with a single vertical cathode. 35 %
The technical feasibility of the plasma carbothennic Gas
reduction of oxides to produce ferroalloys was demonstrat- Coal & 40%
ed by all the reactors sbown in Figures 2 to 7. The choice is "'-;;ot 13 % Coke
basically between operation with a transferred or non- Water
transferred arc. and whether a water-cooled electrode and 47 %
heater design is required. The primary consideration for the V Losses Ho,
selection of a plasma (or for that maner) reactor system for Losses ~ Water 3%
20 %
pilot-plant development is 'can the reactor be scaled-up for
an industrial operation?'. For the commercial production of
ferroalloys, the most successful plasma system has been
r
12 %
-...
FIGURE 8. Energy flow diagrams: SwedeChromc and MS&A plants for
demonstrated to use the basic, unsophisticated design, as
lhe produclion or rerrochromium
shown in Figure 3, of a vertical non-water-caoled, hollow Althougb industrial-worthy water-cooled heaters, both
graphite electrode (HOE) with a d.c. arc transferred to a transferred and non-transferred, have operated reliably. car-
conductive melt. This ultimate design of a plasma ferro- bon electrodes are Jess susceptible to damage resulting from
alloy reactor as demonstrated by the MS&A 30 MW facility operating conditions and rough handling during installation,
follows the 'Keep It Simple' principle. both of which can cause water leaks, electrical faults, and
Scale-up to the multi-megawatt range is the unique fea- short electrode lifetimes. This is particularly apparent in
ture of the hollow carbon d.c. electrode, particularly for tbe larger-scale operations with dusty surroundings producing
production of ferrochromium. The single carbon electrode tonnage products, in comparison wil)] small power-level
can sustain d.c. currents at lea.'it up to 100000 A. In com- torches, which are often used in ultra-clean environments
parison, the water-cooled tungsten electrodes used in the typical of the production of Jow-vo1ume specialty metal~.
Voest-Alpine and TRD systems operate at 5000 A with a
reasonable lifetime of about ISO hours and with an upper
limit of about 10000 A. For these transferred-arc systems, Recent Developments in Plasma-ferroalloy
the power levels are therefore limited to about 4 to 5 MW, Production
corresponding to operating voltages of 400 V. The SKF The plasma production of ferroalloys is a well-established
non-transferred gas heaters with water-cooled copper elec- technical fact. Some commercially driven changes have
trodes for the SwedeCbrome plant are rated al 6 to 7 MW. been noted with the expansion of the MS&A ferrochromi-
26 INFACON 6
um plant and the closing of the SwedeChrome facility. The MW (40 MVA) at a cost of $10 million'8 The 40 MVA
technology is maturing. and there is a certain allitude of plasma furnace installed at Krugersdorp replaced the 16
confidence as expressed by the plans to install a 12 MW MY A d.c. pla'ima-arc furnace. The prevailing market
ferrochromium plant in South Carolina22 • There have been demand for ultra-low silicon and phosphorus alloy and for
a number of speculative development projects. such as the low-silicon alloy. and the abundant availability of low-cost
Voest-AlpinelDow Corning pilot-plant efforts to produce feed tines and the increased thernHlI efficiency with scale-
silicon and ferrosilicon J3 • and the Davy McKee 5 MW ferro- up. were economic incentives for this further expansion.
manganese remclter11 . These efforts are to be encouraged The piam was recently bought by Samancor and is now
since the technology is still young and advances can still be called Palmiet Ferrochrome Division.
made, particularly in the understanding of how best to opti-
mize the reaclion systems and so improve the yield and Mannesmann Demag, Dalmacija Plant, Dugi Rat,
decrease the net consumption of energy. Yugoslavia
Chromium-ore fines of up to 28 per cent of the feed mix of
Ferrochromium coke, quartz, and are were fed in a test trial through a hol-
The capability for the processing of unagglomerated fines low electrode of a 20 MW submerged-arc a.c. ferrochromi-
(ore. fluxes. and reductants) is the primary economic urn furnace. The test results were encouraging in that the
advumage of plasma reactors for the production of ferro- chromium recovery increased. there was a high smelting
chromium. The charge can be fine chromium ore, concen- rate due to faster smelting in the are, and a means was
trates from friable chromite ore. or crushed ferrochromium established for the recycling of baghouse dust and ferro-
fines. In particular, where the chromium content is upgrad- chromium reverts 2C1 • No further trials have been reported.
ed by ore crushing and further beneficiation, the tine con- . Strictly speaking. this development in a submerged-arc
centrates that are produced are very suitable as feed for a furnace should perhaps not be included in a discussion of
plasma reactor. The fines feed rate must be matched to the plasma reactors; that is. there was no discussion of the arc
power level. High feed rates with respect to the input power characteristics or reactjon-zone kinetics that would have
will result in the accumulation of unreacled feed. Al low been influenced by the feed of solids or gases through the
feed rates, excess cnergy is available, and the temperature arc region. From this standpoint. the dcsignation of an elec-
will increase, which can result in furnace damage. undesir- tric-arc process as a plasma-arc process becomes purely
able reactions, and high requirements of unit energy. .~llbjective. It is quite reasonable, though, to regard this
work as an outgrowth of the MS&A d.e. hollow graphite
Middelburg Steel & Alloys (MS&A). Krugersdorp. electrode open-bath process for the production of ferro-
South Africa chromium.
The commercially successful MS&A 12 to 14 MW plant
South Carolina Research Authority, Charleston, S. C.
has been expanded to 30 MW. The 12 MW plant ASEA
d.c. hollow graphite electrode furnace was introduced in The hollow carbon electrode plasma furnace is now being
December 1983. and replaced an existing 9 MW sub- developed for domestic raw materials in the USA. In 1989.
merged-arc furnacc. The process was initially developed at thc Strategic Materials Office of the U.S. Defense Logistics
Mintek on a I MW scale, and required further improve- Agency funded the development 21 of a 1,5 MW plasma fur-
ments for industrial scale_ up IS.16. It is common in the devel- n.ace for the production of ferrochromium 21 . The facility is
opmcnt of plasma furnaces thai major difficulties are ex- slled at the MacAlloy plant in Charleston. S. C. The inten-
perienced in the conveying and feed-rate control of the tion of the programme is to establish a domestic fer-
fines, and less on electrical problems such as unstable or rochromium capability using US chromium-ore sources.
stray arcs. An extensive analysis of the sensitivity of the Low-grade US orcs can be upgraded by crushing and bene-
balance of feed rate to power as related to the arc-ultach- ficiation to produce a 40 per cent chromium oxide concen-
ment zone has been made by Barcza, CUff, and Jones". trate. The processing of these concentrates in conventional
Improvements on the MS&A 12 MW plant included beller submerged-arc furnaces would require costly agglomeration
control over the feed rate to closely match the power level, of the fines. The pilot-trials at 1.5 MW successfully COI11-
and monitoring of back-pressure in the electrodes and selec- pleted at the end of 1991" have provided the design basis
tion of the approprime diameter to minimi7..e electrode f?r a larger demonstration plant. A 12 MW facility to be
blockages. Changes were also made in the design .md opera- Sited at MacAlloy is being considered.
tion of the gas-cleaning system and the off-gas ducts. A recent evaluation concluded that Bird River chromite
Modifications to the slag chemistry also helped to decrease ore would be exceptionally well suiled to reduction in a
the carryover of dust in the exhaust. The chromium recovery plasma fumace 23 • It is apparent that the existence of plas-
was 90 to 95 per cent. The consumption of energy was ma-furnace technology for the processing of are fines will
sliglllly higher than for a submerged-arc furnace but, with stimulate reconsiderarion of other chromite-ore reserves for
scale-up, the consumption of energy would be similar to that the production of ferrochromium.
for the submerged arc furnace. Other developmental work
has included the production of a high-chromium (75 to 80 SwcdeChrome, Malmo, Sweden
per cent), high-carbon ferroalloy to fann a superchrornium In glaring contrast to the 1988 expansion of the MS&A
slag (Cr:Fe 10 to 20: I). This slag was produced in the plas- plant. the 48 MW SwedeChrome planl that started up in
ma furnace by selective reduction or iron out of chromitc are October 1987 was shut down in 19H1J, and reportedly is for
to produce a semi-stainless alloy? (20 per cent chromium). sale. Although the ferrochromium market may have been
At the end of 1988 after a five-year developmenHlI peri- the decisive factor, it is recognized that the process technol-
od. tile 12 MW (16 MVA) operation was upgraded to 30 ogy and site conditions are not comparable with those of
28 INFACON6
Remelting of Ferromanganese-metal Fines con reaction sequence involves the countercurrent flow of
The plasma remelting of ferromanganese flnes started in solid carbon and silicon dioxide, and gaseous CO and SiO.
June 1983 at the Samancor MetaJloys plant'O The trans- Silicon carbide, formed by the reaction of the carbon and
ferred-arc heater is hmited in voltage capabihty owing to SiO gases, reacts with silicon dioxide through an SiO inter-
the conductive manganese vapour. At the full current capa- mediate reaction to form silicon metal. SiO side reactions
bility of 10000 A for the tungsten cathode, the power input form excess silicon carbide and also dissociate to form
is only 3 to 4 MW. deposits of silicon and silicon dioxide, which tend to plug
Davy McKee has described a 5 MW plasma fumace 3l the furnace. In conventional submerged-arc furnaces, it is
based on the operation of a 350 kW pilot plant for the melt- necessary to physically break up the charge to aJlow the
ing of ferromanganese fines. The proprietary design fea- furnaces' gases to escape. As a result, it is necessary to use
tures a cylindrical sleeve that surrounds a d.c. transferred a burden of carefully sized quartz and coke to optimize the
arc I m in length. The fines are fed onto the sleeve, where permeability of the burden. A reactor system capable of
melting occurs, and the melted material then falls off onto processing fines, in this case inexpensive silicon dioxide as
the bulk melt. The 5 MW heater was commissioned for sand, is an attractive application for plasma reactors.
Plasma Arc Limited, Melbourne, Australia. No production
data for this operation have been published. Hollow Graphite Electrode Plasma Reactor
The current limitations of the Voest-Alpine and Davy The capability of producing ferrosilicon from a charge of
McKee plasma heaters (both with water-cooled tungsten silica and carbon fed through a hollow graphite electrode
electrodes), the complexity of the sleeve reactor, and the was demonstrated on a 2 MYA furnace operating continu-
potential for water leaks suggests that the basic hollow ously over a three-week period3o , A decrease in the total
graphite electrode should be used for the melting of ferro- energy required was attributed to the 100 per cent conver-
manganese fines. sion of the silica fed through the hollow electrode, which
was 20 per cent of the charge. The remainder of the charge
Ferrosilicon and Silicon was a conventional burden.
Each ferroalloy system has its characteristic complexity: the
chromite system requires high temperatures, high heat flux- Voest-AlpineIDow Corning Project
es, and a complex slag chemistry; manganese alloys have a An extensive development of a plasma-reactor design, simi-
vapour pressure highly dependent on the alloy component lar to Figure 9, by Voest-Alpine and Dow Coming J3 •34
and concentration; the ferrosilicon reaction system, demonstrated the production of silicon metal from quartz
Si-O-C-Fe, has complex low- and high-temperature re- and sand, and ferrosilicon from taconite fines, at 100 kW.
action sequences involving gaseous intermediates. The sili- The reactor operated with the production of silicon carbide
,
I' ,.i
I t
Step 3
Step 2
N!'t eneorgy
~npu'tl
SiC (I;) +SiO (g)::=2SJ (I) +CO (0) 1. 7klJh/kg SI
pr-oaucPD:
I S~ep 1
~Inpu'b
Neot: I!'nergy
7 .3klJh/kg SI
Si0 2 ell +51 m ~2SIO(g)
progluCPd
FIGURE 10. NTHlSlNTEF reaction sequence and reactor concept for the production of silicon metal-hearth heating with a water-cooled lungsten-cathode
transferred arc, and shaft heating with a graphite electrode38
./' !~~~±~~~}Hearth
Mintek: Melting and Refining of Silicon Fines
Silicon-metal fines have been successfully remelted in a Tapping
lOO kV A transferred-arc plasma furnace under an argon hole
atmosphere36• Remelting resulted in upgraded quality from
0,45 per cent AI and 0,17 per cent Ca to 0,19 per cent AI
and 0,0 I per cent Ca.
30 INFACON6
TABLE III
INDUSTRIAL PLASMA INSTALLATIONS FOR THE MELTING OF METALS AND ALLOYS
Process Feed Product System Power capacity Start-up Plant location Reference
Meltinglrefining Alloy scrap Alloy steel Freitnl 20 MW. 30-ton melt 1973 VEB,8 May 1945, Freital, 51
10 MW, 10 ton 1982
Mannesman 3 MW, 100tOil melt 1986 FRG 52
Demag (Krupp) 30-ton ladle
-
FrehaJ/ 4x3MW,45ton 1983 Voest-Alpine, Linz. 53
Voest-Alpine (decommissioned Austria
in 1987)
Tj scrap/ Ti ingot Retech 2 x 300 kW 1988 Prall & Whitney, 58
sponge East Hartford, CT
Retech 2,IMW 1988 Wyman-Gordon, 59
Worchester, MA
Retcch 2,25 MW 1989 Teledyne-Allvae. 60
Monroe. NC
Stuinless scrap Ingot slabs ULVAC () x 0,4 MW 1986 Nippon Stainless Steel 61
(4 l)
Ti scrap Ingot PEClLeybold 3 x 400 kW 1990 TiMet, Henderson, NV 62
Scrap consolidation Ti scrap / Ti electrodes Retech 0,8MW 1984 Oregon Metallurgical 57
sponge 14/22/28" dia Corp., Albany, OR
Plasma blast Foundry-iron Fe Westinghouse 6x 1,5MW 1989 General MOlars, Central 77
cupola melting chips, borings Foundry Div., Defiance,
Ohio
Aerosputiale 4MW 1989 Peugeot, Sept-Fons 78
TABLE IV
INDUSTRIAL PLASMA INSTALLATIONS FOR THE HEATING OF METALS AND ALLOYS
Process Feed Product System Power capacity Start-up Plant localion Reference
Ladle heating! Steel melt Heated melt Hollow graphite 16.8 MVA 1988 CPl Steel Corp .. 83
refining electrodes 3 phase a.c. Pucblo, Colorado
Fcrroal1oys FeSi SINTEF IMW 1982 Halla Smeltverk. Norway 85
Alloy stcels Mannesman 6MW 1989 Krupp Sicgen Steclworks 86
Carbon steels Dcrnag (KnipP) 3 phase a.e.
Low/med. cilrbon Advent Proccss Hollow graphite 1992 Maynard Steel Casting Co., 84
steels Engineering electrode, I MW, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
5 ton (dcmo)
Tundish heating Steel melt Heated melt Tetronics R&D I MW, 14-lon melt 1987 Nippon Steel, 88
Hirohata Works
Tetronics R&D 350 kW, 5 ton 1988 Aichi Steel 89
Tetronics R&D 1,1 MW. 40 Lon 1989 NKK Keihin no. 3 90
TeLronics R&D 1,1 MW, 40 ton 1989 NKK Keihin no. 4 90
TeLronics R&D 1,1 MW,40ton 1990 NKK Keihin no. I 89
Tetronies R&D 1,1 MW,50LOn 1990 NKK Keihin no. 5 89
Tetronics R&D 1,1 MW, 17ton 1990 NKK Fukuyama 89
Tetronics R&D 0,8 MW, 6 ton 1990 Anva! Nyby Powder AB 89
Mannesmann 2 MW, 20 LOn 1988 Deltasidar (ltaly), 91
Dcmag (Krupp) Aosta Works.
Manncsman 2,4 MW. 80 ton 1989 Kobe. Knkogawa Works 92
Dcmag (Krupp)
Plasma Energy 4 MW, 27 ton 1988 Chaparral. 93
Corporation Midlothian, Texas 94
Plasma Energy 1,5MW 1990 FirSL Miss (SLoney Creek) 95
Corporation Steel, Hollsopple, PA
Plasma reforming: Iron oxide Fe:<OlFe SKP Plasma- 3 x2MW 1981 Hofors, Sweden 79
(<.Ie<.:oml11i~·
Production of pellets/ore prereduced Red
sinned in
reduction gas product 19R~)
Iron oxide Fc:<O/Fe Huls USCO 1986 Union Steel Corp., S.A. 80
pellets/ore prereduced (mothballe<.l
in IlJHH)
prodUCI
32 INFACON6
chrome ore fines. 48th Electric Furnace Conference, Remelting of silicon metal fines. SINTEF, Div. of
Proc., vol. 48, pp. 267-270. lrollmaker alld Steelmaker, Metall., Plasma Techn. Group, Report 2/88. 24 pp.
vol 18,no.3,p. 11. (b) Bakken, J.A., and Jensen, R. (1990). Plasma
21. Ellio". J.F. (1989). Plasma smelling le51 progmm is research at the Norwegian Insilutc of Technology.
underway. Americall Metal.. Market, vol. 97, no. 100, Proceedings, Conference on Plasma for Industry and
Suppl. Ferroalloys, p. 29A. Environment, Oxford, lhe British National Committee
22. Larson, H.R., and Perkins, B.R. (1991). Smelting fine for Electroheal, Paper 3.1,8 pp.
chrome ores in a plasma arc furnace. 49th Electric 38. Sakaguchi, Y., Fukai, M., Aratani, F. Ishizaki, M.,
Furnace Conference, Toronto. Kawahara, T.. and Toshiyagawa, M. (1991). Production
23. Healy, G.W. (1988). Carbon redUClion of chromites in of high purity silicon by carbothennic reduction of silica
Bird River and other ores and concentrates at 1200- using AC-arc furnace with heated shaft. Tet,'iU-to-
1700 DC. Canadian Metallurgical Quanerly, vol. 27. Hagane, vol. 77, no. 10, pp. 1656-1663.
no. 4, pp. 281-285. 39. Pickles, C.A., McLean, A., Alcock, C.B., and Nikolic,
24. Wikander, A.B., Herlitz, H.G., and Santen, S.O. (1987). R.N. (1990). Plasma recovery of melal values from fly-
The first year of opemtion at SwedeChrome. 45th ash. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, vol. 29. no. 3,
pp. 193-200.
Electric Furnace COllferellce, Proc., vol. 45, pp.
225-231. Ferromolybdenum
25. Wikander, A.B., and Rosendahl, P. (1989). The 40. Mac Rae, D.R., and Gold, R.G. (1979). Arc control in
PlasmaChrome process at SwedeChrome AB. INFA-
plasma arc reactors. U.S. Patelll 4. 234.334, appl. 10
CON, New Orleans. Jan. 1979, acc. 18 Nov. 1980. 6 pp.
26. Srinivasan, N.S., Santen, S., and Stafransson, L.1. 41. Johnston, c., and Pickles, C.A. (1990). Study of the
(1987). PlasmaCl1rome process for ferrochrome produc- reaction of molybdenum disulphide with lime and car-
tion - thermochemical modelling and application 10 pro- bon at plasma temperatures. TrailS. InSTn Min. Metall..
cess data. Steel Research, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 151-156. vol. 99, pp. CIOo--CI04.
Ferromanganese
42.0uyang, T., and Cao, Y. (1986). Experimenlal study of
smelting ferromolybdenulll by three phase A.C. plasma
27. UIE International Union for Electroheat (1988). SFPO arc. International Conference 011 Plasma Science and
plasma-Jired ferromanganese bla,\·t furnace VIE arc Technology. Beijillg, pp. 279-284.
plasmll processes, pp. 95-98.
28. Truffaut. E. (1990). Rational use of thermal plasmas for Fcrrovanadiurn
melaHic oxides smelting. Conference on Plasma for 43. Mac Rae, D.R., Gold, R.G., Sandall, W.R., and
Industry and Environment, Oxford. The Brilish National Thompson, C.D. (1976). Ferrovanadium production by
Committee for Electroheat. Paper 1.2, 7 pp. plasma carbothennic reduction of vanadium oxide. 34th
29. Mueller. H.G.. Malzawrakos, P., and AubergeI', H. Electric Furnace COllferellce. Proc., pp. 96-100.
Smelting of ferromanganese for oxidic ores - a new 44. Mac Rae, D.R., Gold R.G., Sandall, W.R., and
way. Ibid., Paper 4.5, 10 pp. Thompson, C.D. (1976). Melhod of producing fer-
30. Samancor's chrome showing strength. (1983). Metal rovanadium. U.S. Patelll 4. 099, 958, appl. 9 Apr. 1976.
Bulletill, no. 6798, June 24, p. 15. acc. I I J ul. 1978, 6 pp.
31. Kershaw, P.. Moss, OJ., Gill, M.E., and Heggie, J.G.
(1989). A 5 MW plasma arc furnace for the production Fcrroniobium
of ferro-alloys. Proceedings, Third European Electric 45. Hilborn, M.M., Munz, RJ., Berk, D., and Drouet, M.G.
Steel Congress. Boumemouth. pp.340-344. (1989). Evaluation of ferroniobiulll carbide production
in a laboratory-scale Plasmacan furnace. Canadian
Ferrosilicon Metallllrgiclli Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 101-107.
32. Orrling, B. (1988). Correspondence, Pilot plant trials for 46. Munz. RJ., and Chin. EJ. (1991). The carbothermic
production of silicon metal and ferrosilicon in the reduction of niobium pentoxide and pyrochlore in a
(ASEA) direct currenl furnace, 32 pp. transferred arc argon plasma. Canadian Metallurgical
33. Dosaj. V.D., May, J.B., Raucholz, A.W., Muller, H.G.. Quarterly, vol. 3D, no., I, pp. 21-29.
and Koch, E. (1989). Pla,ma smelting of silica from Cr, Ni, Mo (Stainless-sleel Recycle Dusts)
sand and ferrosilicon from taconite. 47th Electric
Furnace Conference. Proceedings, vol. 47, pp. 43-48. 47. Herlitz. H.G .. Johansson, B.. Santell, S.O., Feinman, J.
(1987). EAF dust decomposition and metals recovery at
34. Dosaj, V.D., and Raucholz, A.W. (1989). Feasibility of ScanDust. 45111 Electric Furnace Conference, Proc.,
plasma smelting of silicon. Center for Materials vol. 45, pp. 81-89.
Produclion, Report no. 88-8, 134 pp.
48. Johansson, B., aod Lofgren, U. (1990). Operation of the
35. Dosaj, V.D., Haines, C.M., Brumels, M.D., and May, Scandust plant on stainless steel dust. Proceedings.
J.B. (1991). Silicon smelting in a closed furnace. 49th Conference on Plasma for Industry and Environment,
Electric Furnace Conference, Toronto. Oxford, The British National Committee for
36. McRae, L.B. (1983). The remelting of silicon fines. Electroheat. Paper 2.5, 13 pp.
Minlek, Report M135. 49. (a) Roddis, B.. and Cooke, R. (1990). Recycle of melals
37. (a) Bakken, J.A., Holt, NJ., and Jensen, R. (1988). from stainless steelmaking dusts by a plasma smelting
34 JNFACON6
77. Dighe, S.Y. (1991). Plasma cupola iron melling. 49th 87. Dembovsky, Y., and Motloch, Z. Potential of plasma
ElecLric Furnace Conference, Toronto. technology in the ladle refining of steel. Proceedings,
78. Pineau. M. (1990). Plasma on a found I)' cupola. Conference on Plasma for Industry and Environment,
Symposium on Industrial and Environmental Oxford, The British National Comminee for
Applications of Plasma, Electric Power Research Electroheat, Paper 1.5, 10 pp.
Institute. Palo Alto. 21 pp.
79 Herlitz. H.G., Johansson, B., and Santen, S.O. (1984). A
new family of processes based on plasma technology. Tundish Heating and Continuous Casting
Iroll and Steel Ellgilleer. vol. 61. no. 3, pp_ 39-44. 88. Kuwabara, T., Umezawa, K., Nube, T., and Fukuyama,
80. Union Steel Corporation of South Africa. (1984). M. (1987). Development of tundish plasma heater. 8th
Plasma production of reducing gas for direct reduction International Symposium 011 Plasma Chemistry, IUPAC
of iron ores. Meral Blllletin Mall/Illy. May, pp. 28, 31. Proceedillgs, vol. 4, pp. 2247-2252.
89. Tetronics R&D Co., Faringdon, U.K. (1990). Personal
Platinum and Gold
communication, May.
81. Saville, J. (1985). Recovery of PGMs by plasma arc
90. Mizushina, M., Kitano, Y., Suga, Y., Saiki, M., and
smelting (first commercial plant). 9th International
Suguro, Y. (1990). Development of tundish plasma
Precious Metals Coof., New York.
healing system. Proceedings. Conference on Plasma for
82. McRae. L.B., and Kleyensttiber. A.S.E., (1990). The Industry and Environment. Oxford, The British National
pyrometallurgieal rccovel)' of gold from leached calcine Committee for Eleclroheat.
residues. J. S. Afr. I""t. Min. Merall.. submitted 1990.
91. Hoster, T., Bebber, H,J., and Breitzmann, M. (1988).
Ladle Heating and Refining Isothermal C0111;IlUOllS casting using the Krupp A. C.
83. Oliver. J.F.. Stefanic, S.M., and Kemeny, F.L. (1988). plasma system for lUndis!? heating. Krupp Industries,
Plasma heating for ladle treatment furnaces. 46th [nc., Brussels, 8 pp.
£IecII'ic Arc Furnace Conference, Proc.. vol. 46, pp. 92. Saito, T., Matsuo, K., Fujimoto, H., Maeda, M., lmiya,
313-321. K., and Umahashi, K. (1991). Development of AC plas-
84. Kemeny, F.L. (1992). Plasma arc ladle heming and ma arc heating system in tundish. Tetsu-to-Hagane, vol.
refining for the foundry industry. Plasma 20002, 13th 77, no. 10, pp. 1649-1655.
Advanced Technology Symposium, Iron & Steel Soc.. 93. Cheek, D.L. (1988). Progress report on the plasma
Charleston, South Carolina. tundish heater at Chaparral Steel. Plasma Energy
85. Bakken. J.A., and Haraldsen, S. (1982). Immersed arc Corporation, Internal Memo, II pp.
heater. 40th Electric Arc Furnace Conference. Proc., 94. Walzer, G. (1989). Plasma tundish heating - improving
vol. 40, pp. 251-256. casting productivity at Chaparral Steel. Center for
86. Neuschutz, D., Schubert, K.-H., and Bebber, H,J. Metals Production, Mellon Inst., Pinsburgh, CMP
(1991). Metallurgical results from a 30 ton AC plasma Tecllllpplication, CMP-046, 2 pp.
ladle furnace. Steel Research. vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 95. Stoney Creek Steel: a steelmaking showcase. (1989).
390--394. lroll Age, vol. 5. no. II, pp. 33-34.