Copar
Copar
Jinky G. Noquiao
NR-32
Submitted to:
Prof. Ben De Paz
I. Introduction
II. General Objective
Specific Objective
1.
2.
3.
4.
III. Family Nursing Assessment
Almost of the family member are students and some has their
own occupation such as welder, Jollibee attendant and other member is
house keeper.
IV.
a. Lack of the
necessary facilities,
equipment and
supplies of care
One member of the family has 10 years’ post CVA, his right arm
become mild paralyzed, lessens the ability to do some task. Its
affect his way of living, doing his task in the family and school but
now he is practicing a healthy lifestyle to reduce the risk for having
CVA again.
2. Presence of vectors
Vectors such as cockroach, rat, and mosquitoes are present in
family’s house. Vectors came from outside the house. It affects the
family health by cross contamination of microorganisms. So it
considered as health threat to each member.
4. Low income
Even though family is being supported by their relative working
in abroad still the income is not exact for their daily needs. Only
two of the family member has a job.
5. No permanent address
Family fun of migrating from one place to another it can
decrease socialization and popularization in one place. it is an
additional family expenditure.
VI. Scoring
Wellness state 3
Health threat 2
Foreseeable crisis 1
3. Preventive potential
3
High
0.7
2/3X1
Moderate
1
Low
4. Salience
2/2X1 1
A condition or problem needing
immediate attention
1
A condition or problem not needing
immediate attention
Not perceived as a problem or 0
condition needing change
TOTAL 3.7
2. Presence of vectors
SCALE FOR RANKING HEALTH CONDITIONS AND PROBLEMS ACCDG. TO PRIORITIES
CRITERIA WEIGHT
. 1. Nature of the condition or problem
presented
3
Wellness state
3
Health deficit
2/3X1 0.7
Health threat
1
Foreseeable crisis
Partially modifiable 0
Not modifiable
3. Preventive potential
3/3X1 1
High
2
Moderate
1
Low
4. Salience
2/2X1 1
A condition or problem needing
immediate attention
1
A condition or problem not needing
immediate attention
0
Not perceived as a problem or
condition needing change
TOTAL 4.7
Wellness state 3
Health deficit 3
Foreseeable crisis 1
3. Preventive potential
3
High
2/3X1 0.7
Moderate
1
Low
4. Salience
2/2X1 1
A condition or problem needing
immediate attention
1
A condition or problem not needing
immediate attention
0
Not perceived as a problem or
condition needing change
TOTAL 3.4
4. Low income
SCALE FOR RANKING HEALTH CONDITIONS AND PROBLEMS ACCDG. TO PRIORITIES
CRITERIA WEIGHT Score
. Nature of the condition or problem presented
Wellness state 3
Health deficit 3
Foreseeable crisis 1
3. Preventive potential 1
3/3X1
High
2
Moderate
1
Low
4. Salience 1
2/2X1
A condition or problem needing
immediate attention
1
A condition or problem not needing
immediate attention
0
Not perceived as a problem or
condition needing change
TOTAL 4.7
5. No permanent address
SCALE FOR RANKING HEALTH CONDITIONS AND PROBLEMS ACCDG. TO PRIORITIES
CRITERIA WEIGHT
. Nature of the condition or problem presented
Wellness state 3
Health deficit 3
Health threat 2
3. Preventive potential
3/3X1 1
High
2
Moderate
1
Low
4. Salience
2
A condition or problem needing
immediate attention
1/2X1 1
A condition or problem not needing
immediate attention
0
Not perceived as a problem or
condition needing change
TOTAL 3.33
2) Presence of
vectors……………………………………………………………………………………….4.7
3) Hypertension/
CVA………………………………………………………………………………………..3.7
5) No permanent
address………………………………………………………………………………….3.33
VIII. Family Health Task
X. Evaluation