Scribd
Upload
221 views4 pages

American International University - Bangladesh (AIUB) Student Course Evaluation Form

This document contains a student course evaluation form used by American International University - Bangladesh (AIUB) to collect feedback from students on various aspects of courses. The form evaluates 6 core areas: 1) course content and organization, 2) student contribution, 3) learning environment and teaching methods, 4) learning resources, 5) quality of delivery, and 6) assessment. Students are asked to rate aspects of each area on a 5-point scale and provide additional comments. The form also includes sections to collect feedback on consultations, practical sessions, and an overall evaluation of the best and most improvable parts of the course. The feedback is used by AIUB's Institutional Quality Assurance Cell to help improve course quality.

Uploaded by

Tariqul Islam Tanim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
221 views4 pages

American International University - Bangladesh (AIUB) Student Course Evaluation Form

This document contains a student course evaluation form used by American International University - Bangladesh (AIUB) to collect feedback from students on various aspects of courses. The form evaluates 6 core areas: 1) course content and organization, 2) student contribution, 3) learning environment and teaching methods, 4) learning resources, 5) quality of delivery, and 6) assessment. Students are asked to rate aspects of each area on a 5-point scale and provide additional comments. The form also includes sections to collect feedback on consultations, practical sessions, and an overall evaluation of the best and most improvable parts of the course. The feedback is used by AIUB's Institutional Quality Assurance Cell to help improve course quality.

Uploaded by

Tariqul Islam Tanim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Form 1 (IQAC): Course Evaluation by Students

American International University – Bangladesh (AIUB)

STUDENT COURSE EVALUATION FORM


(To be filled by each Student at the time of Course Completion)

Department Course Code:


Course Title Teacher Name:
Year of Study Semester/Term:

 Please give us your views so that Course quality can be improved.


 You are encouraged to be frank and constructive in your comments
 Evaluate the following aspects of the course by marking “√” in the box of
corresponding column according to the scale given:
5–Strongly agree; 4–Agree; 3–Neutral; 2–Disagree; 1–Strongly disagree;

CORE QUESTIONS
I. Course Content and Organization 5 4 3 2 1
1. The course objectives were clear
2. The Course workload was manageable
3. The Course was well organized (e.g. access to materials, notification of
changes, etc.)
Additional Comments:
II. Student Contribution 5 4 3 2 1
4. Approximate level of your own attendance during the whole Course
5. Participated actively in the Course
6. Progress in this Course
Additional Comments:
III. Learning Environment and Teaching Methods 5 4 3 2 1
7. Course was well structured to achieve the learning outcomes (there was a
good balance of lectures, tutorials, practical etc.)
8. The learning and teaching methods encouraged participation.
9. The overall environment in the class was conducive to learning.
10. Classrooms were satisfactory
Additional Comments:
IV. Learning Resources 5 4 3 2 1
11. Learning materials (Lesson Plans, Course Notes etc.) were relevant and
useful.
Form 1 (IQAC): Course Evaluation by Students

Institutional Quality Assurance Cell Operations Manual

12. Recommended readings, books etc. were relevant and appropriate


13. The provision of learning resources in the library was adequate and
appropriate
14. The provision of learning resources on the Web was adequate and
appropriate (if relevant)
Additional Comments:
V. Quality of Delivery 5 4 3 2 1
15. The Course stimulated my interest and thought on the subject area
16. The pace of the Course was appropriate
17. Ideas and concepts were presented clearly
Additional Comments
VI. Assessment 5 4 3 2 1
18. The method of assessment were reasonable
19. Feedback on assessment was timely
20. Feedback on assessment was helpful
Additional Comments

ADDITIONAL CORE QUESTIONS


VII. Consultations 5 4 3 2 1
1. The material in the consultation was useful
2. Amount of work needed for consultation was affordable
3. The teacher dealt effectively with my problems
VIII. Practical 5 4 3 2 1
1. The material in the practical was useful
2. The demonstrators dealt effectively with my problems.

OVERALL EVALUATION
The best features of the Course were:
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

The Course could have been improved by:

____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Form 1 (IQAC): Course Evaluation by
Students
Form 1 (IQAC): Course Evaluation by Students

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy