TSN Unit 1 PDF
TSN Unit 1 PDF
MULTIPLEXING
Transmission Systems
Functionally, the communications channels between switching systems are referred to as trunks. In
the past, these channels were implemented with a variety of facilities, including pairs of wires,
coaxial cable, and point-to-point microwave radio links. Except for special situations, trunk facilities
now utilize optical fibers.
Open Wire
A classical picture of the telephone network in the past consisted of telephone poles with crossarms
and glass insulators used to support uninsulated open-wire pairs. Except in rural environments, the
open wire has been replaced with multipair cable systems or fiber. The main advantage of an open-
wire pair is its relatively low attenuation (a few hundredths of a decibel per mile at voice
frequencies). Hence, open wire is particularly useful for long, rural customer loops. The main
disadvantages are having to separate the wires with cross arms to prevent shorting and the need for
large amounts of copper. (A single open-wire strand has a diameter that is five times the diameter of
a typical strand in a multipair cable. Thus open wire uses roughly 25 times as much copper as does
cable.) As a result of copper costs and the emergence of low electronics costs, open wire in rural
environments has been mostly replaced with cable systems using (digital) amplifiers to offset
attenuation on long loops.
Paired Cable
1
In response to overcrowded cross arms and high maintenance costs, multipair cable systems were
introduced as far back as 1883. Today a single cable may contain anywhere from 6 to 2700 wire
pairs. Figure 1.1 shows the structure of a typical cable. When telephone poles are used, a single
cable can provide all the circuits required on the route, thereby eliminating the need for crossarms.
More recently the preferred means of cable distribution is to bury it directly in the ground (buried
cable) or use underground conduit (underground cable).
Table 1.1 lists the most common wire sizes to be found within paired-cable systems. The lower
gauge (higher diameter) systems are used for longer distances where signal attenuation and direct-
current (dc) resistance can become limiting factors. Figure 1.14 shows attenuation curves for the
common gauges of paired cable as a function of frequency. An important point to notice in Figure
1.1 is that the cable pairs are capable of carrying much higher frequencies than required by a
telephone quality voice signal (approximately 3.4 kHz).
When the impedance matching network Z exactly matches the impedance of the two-wire circuit,
near-perfect isolation of the two four-wire branches can be realized. Impedance matching used to be
a time-consuming, manual process and was therefore not commonly used. Furthermore, the two-
wire circuits were usually switched connections so the impedance that had to be matched would
change with each connection. For these reasons the impedances of two-wire lines connected to
hybrids were rarely matched. The effect of an impedance mismatch is to cause an echo, the power
level of which is related to the degree of mismatch.
Loading Coils
The attenuation curves shown in Figure 1.5 indicate that the higher frequencies of the voice
spectrum (up to 3.4 kHz) experience more attenuation than the lower frequencies. This frequency-
dependent attenuation distorts the voice signal and is referred to as amplitude distortion. Amplitude
distortion becomes most significant on long cable pairs, where the attenuation difference is greatest.
The introduction of cable systems into the transmission plant to increase the circuit packing density
of open wire is one instance of multiplexing in the telephone network. This form of multiplexing,
referred to as space division multiplexing, involves nothing more than bundling more than one pair
of wires into a single cable. The telephone network uses two other forms of multiplexing, both of
which use electronics to pack more than one voice circuit into the bandwidth of a single
transmission medium. Analog frequency division multiplexing (FDM) has been used extensively in
point-to-point microwave radios and to a much lesser degree on some obsolete coaxial cable and
wire-line systems. FDM is also utilized in fiber optic transmission systems, where it is referred to as
wavelength division multiplexing (WDM). Digital time division multiplexing (TDM) is the
dominant form of multiplexing used in the telephone networks worldwide.
Frequency Division Multiplexing
As indicated in Figure, an FDM system divides the available bandwidth of the transmission medium
into a number of narrower bands or subchannels. Individual voice signals are inserted into the
subchannels by amplitude modulating appropriately selected carrier frequencies. As a compromise
between realizing the largest number of voice channels in a multiplex system and maintaining
acceptable voice fidelity, the telephone companies established 4 kHz as the standard bandwidth of a
voice circuit. If both sidebands produced by amplitude modulation are used (as in obsolete N1 or N2
carrier systems on paired cable), the subchannel bandwidth is 8 kHz, and the corresponding carrier
frequencies lie in the middle of each subchannel. Since doublesideband modulation is wasteful of
bandwidth, single-sideband (SSB) modulation was used whenever the extra terminal costs were
justified. The carrier frequencies for single-sideband systems lie at either the upper or lower edge of
the corresponding subchannel, depending on whether the lower or upper sideband is selected. The
A5 channel bank multiplexer of AT&T used lower sideband modulation. r?
FDM Hierarchy
In order to standardize the equipment in the various broadband transmission systems of the original
analog network, the Bell System established an FDM hierarchy as provided in Table 1.2. CCITT
recommendations specify the same hierarchy at the lower end. Optical technology is customarily
defined in terms of the wavelength of the optical signal as opposed to the corresponding frequency.
Actually, the usable bandwidth of an FDM voice channel was closer to 3 kHz due to guard bands
needed by the FDM separation filters.
TABLE 1.2 FDM Hierarchy of the Bell Network
Multiplex Level Number of Formation Frequency Band
Voice Circuits (kHz)
levels. Each level of the hierarchy is implemented using a set of standard FDM modules. The
multiplex equipment is independent of particular broadband transmission media.
All multiplex equipment in the FDM hierarchy used SSB modulation. Thus, every voice circuit
required approximately 4 kHz of bandwidth. The lowest level building block in the hierarchy is a
channel group consisting of 12 voice channels. A channel group multiplex uses a total bandwidth of
48 kHz. Figure 1.20 shows a block diagram of an A5 channel group multiplexer, the most common
A-type channel bank used for first-level multiplexing. Twelve modulators using 12 separate carriers
generate 12 double-sideband signals as indicated. Each channel is then bandpass filtered to select
only the lower sideband of each double-sideband signal. The composite multiplex signal is
produced by superposing the filter outputs. Demultiplex equipment in a receiving terminal uses the
same basic processing in reverse order.
Notice that a sideband separation filter not only removes the upper sideband but also restricts the
bandwidth of the retained signal: the lower sideband. These filters therefore represented a basic
point in the analog telephone network that defined the bandwidth of a voice circuit. Since FDM was
used on all long-haul analog circuits,long-distance connections provided somewhat less than 4 kHz
of bandwidth. (The loading coils discussed previously also produce similar bandwidth limitations
into a voice circuit.)
As indicated in Table 1.2, the second level of the FDM hierarchy is a 60-channel multiplex
referred to as a supergroup. Figure shows the basic implementation of an LMX group bank that
multiplexes five first-level channel groups. The resulting 60- channel multiplex output is identical to
that obtained when the channels are individually translated into 4-kHz bands from 312 to 552 kHz.
Direct translation requires 60 separate SSB systems with 60 distinct carriers. The LMX group bank,
however, uses only five SSB systems plus five lower level modules. Thus two-stage multiplexing, as
implied by the LMX group bank, requires more total equipment but achieves economy through the
use of common building blocks.
Because a second-level multiplexer packs individual first-level signals together without guard
bands, the carrier frequencies and bandpass filters in the LMX group bank must be maintained with
high accuracy. Higher level multiplexers do not pack the lower level signals as close together.
Notice that a master group, for example, does not provide one voice channel for every 4 kHz of
bandwidth. It is not practical to maintain the tight spacing between the wider bandwidth signals at
higher frequencies. Furthermore, higher level multiplex signals include pilot tones to monitor
transmission link quality and aid in carrier recovery.
1.3.2 Time Division Multiplexing
Basically, time division multiplexing (TDM) involves nothing more than sharing a transmission
medium by establishing a sequence of time slots during which individual sources can transmit
signals. Thus the entire bandwidth of the facility is periodically available to each source for a
restricted time interval. In contrast, FDM systems assign a restricted bandwidth to each source for
all time. Normally, all time slots of a TDM system are of equal length. Also, each subchannel is
usually assigned a time slot with a common repetition period called a frame interval. This form of
TDM is sometimes referred to as synchronous time division multiplexing to specifically imply that
each subchannel is assigned a certain amount of transmission capacity determined by the time slot
duration and the repetition rate. With this second form of multiplexing, subchannel rates are allowed
to vary according to the individual needs of the sources. The backbone digital links of the public
telephone network (T-carrier, digital microwave, and fiber optics) use a synchronous variety of
TDM.
Time division multiplexing is normally associated only with digital transmission links. Although
analog TDM transmission can be implemented by interleaving samples from each signal, the
individual samples are usually too sensitive to all varieties of transmission impairments. In contrast,
time division switching of analog signals is more feasible than analog TDM transmission because
noise and distortion within the switching equipment are more controllable.
T-Carrier Systems
The volume of interoffice telephone traffic in the United States has traditionally grown more rapidly
than local traffic. This rapid growth put severe strain on the older interoffice transmission facilities
that are designed for lower traffic volumes. Telephone companies were often faced with the
necessary task of expanding the number of interoffice circuits. T-carrier systems were initially
developed as a cost-effective means for interoffice transmission: both for initial installations and for
relief of crowded interoffice cable pairs.
Despite the need to convert the voice signals to a digital format at one end of a T1 line and back
to analog at the other, the combined conversion and multiplexing cost of a digital TDM terminal was
lower than the cost of a comparable analog FDM terminal. The first T-carrier systems were designed
specifically for exchange area trunks at distances between 10 and 50 miles.
A T-carrier system consists of terminal equipment at each end of a line and a number of
regenerative repeaters at intermediate points in the line. The function of each regenerative repeater is
to restore the digital bit stream to its original form before transmission impairments obliterate the
identity of the digital pulses. The line itself, including the regenerative repeaters, is referred to as a
span line. The original terminal equipment was referred to as D-type (digital) channel banks, which
came in numerous versions. The transmission lines were wire pairs using 16- to 26-gauge cable. A
block diagram of a T-carrier system is shown in Figure 1.40.
The first T1 systems used D1A channel banks for interfacing, converting, and multiplexing 24
analog circuits. A channel bank at each end of a span line provided interfacing for both directions of
transmission. Incoming analog signals were time division multiplexed and digitized for
transmission. When received at the other end of the line, the incoming bit stream was decoded into
analog samples, demultiplexed, and filtered to reconstruct the original signals. Each individual TDM
channel was assigned 8 bits per time slot. Thus, there were (24)(8) = 192 bits of information in a
frame. One additional bit was added to each frame to identify the frame boundaries, thereby produc-
ing a total of 193 bits in a frame. Since the frame interval is 125 msec, the basic T1 line rate became
1.544 Mbps. This line rate has been established as the fundamental standard for digital transmission
in North America and Japan. The standard is referred to as a DS1 signal (for digital signal 1).
A similar standard of 2.048 Mbps has been established by ITU-T for most of the rest of the world.
This standard evolved from a Tl-like system that provides 32 channels at the same rate as the North
American channels. Only 30 of the channels in the El standard, however, are used for voice. The
other two are used for frame synchronization and signaling. The greatly increased attenuation of a
wire pair at the frequencies of a DS1 signal (772 kHz center frequency) mandates the use of
amplification at intermediate points of a T1 span line. In contrast to an analog signal, however, a
digital signal can not only be amplified but also be detected and regenerated. That is, as long as a
pulse can be detected, it can be restored to its original form and relayed to the next line segment. For
this reason T1 repeaters are referred to as regenerative repeaters. The basic functions of these
repeaters are:
1. Equalization
2. Clock recovery
3. Pulse detection
4. Transmission
Equalization is required because the wire pairs introduce certain amounts of both phase and
amplitude distortion that cause intersymbol interference if uncompensated. Clock recovery is
required for two basic purposes: first, to establish a timing signal to sample the incoming pulses;
second, to transmit outgoing pulses at the same rate as at the input to the line.
Regenerative repeaters are normally spaced every 6000 ft in a T1 span line. This distance was
chosen as a matter of convenience for converting existing voice frequency cables to T-carrier lines.
Interoffice voice frequency cables typically used loading coils that were spaced at 6000-ft intervals.
Since these coils were located at convenient access points (manholes) and had to be removed for
high-frequency transmission, it was only natural that the 6000-ft interval be chosen. One general
exception is that the first regenerative repeater is typically spaced 3000 ft from a central office. The
shorter spacing of this line segment was needed to maintain a relatively strong signal in the presence
of impulse noise generated by older switching machines.
The operating experience of T1 systems was so favorable that they were continually upgraded
and expanded. One of the initial improvements produced TIC systems that provide higher
transmission rates over 22-gauge cable. A TIC line operates at 3.152 Mbps for 48 voice channels,
twice as many as a T1 system.
Another level of digital transmission became available in 1972 when the T2 system was
introduced. This system was designed for toll network connections. In contrast, T1 systems were
originally designed only for exchange area transmission. The T2 system provided for 96 voice
channels at distances up to 500 miles. The line rate was 6.312 Mbps, which is referred to as a DS2
standard. The transmission media was special low-capacitance 22-gauge cable. By using separate
cables for each direction of transmission and the specially developed cables, T2 systems could use
repeater spac- ings up to 14,800 ft in low-noise environments. The emergence of optical fiber sys-
tems made copper-based T2 transmission systems obsolete.
TDM Hierarchy
In a manner analogous to the FDM hierarchy, AT&T established a digital TDM hierarchy that has
become the standard for North America. Starting with a DS1 signal as
Digital TDM Signals of North America and Japan
Digital Number of Multiplexer Bit Rate Transmission
Signal Voice Designation (Mbps) Media
Number Circuits
a fundamental building block, all other levels are implemented as a combination of some number of
lower level signals. The designation of the higher level digital multiplexers reflects the respective
input and output levels. For example, an M12 multiplexer combines four DS1 signals to form a
single DS2 signal. Table lists the various multiplex levels, their bit rates, and the transmission
media used for each. Notice that the bit rate of a high-level multiplex signal is slightly higher than
the combined rates of the lower level inputs. A similar digital hierarchy has also been established by
ITU-T as an international standard.
Digital Pair-Galn Systems
Following the successful introduction of T1 systems for interoffice trunks, most major
manufacturers of telephone equipment developed digital TDM systems for local distribution. These
systems are most applicable to long rural loops where the cost of the electronics is offset by the
savings in wire pairs. No matter what the distance is, unexpected growth can be most economically
accommodated by adding electronics, instead of wire, to produce a pair-gain system. The possibility
of trailer parks, apartment houses, or Internet service providers springing up almost overnight
causes nightmares in the minds of cable plant forecasters. Pair-gain systems provide a networking
alternative to dispel those nightmares. Digital pair-gain systems are also useful as alternatives to
switching offices in small communities. Small communities are often serviced by small automatic
switching systems normally unattended and remotely controlled from a larger switching office
nearby. These small community switches are referred to as community dial offices Because T2
transmission systems have become obsolete, the Ml 2 function exists only in a functional sense
within Ml3 multiplexers, which multiplex 28 DS1 signals into 1 DS3 signal. (CDOs). A CDO
typically provides only limited service features to the customers and often requires considerable
maintenance. Because digital pair-gain systems lower transmission costs for moderate-sized groups
of subscribers, they are a viable alternative to a CDO: Stations in the small community are serviced
from the central office by way of pair-gain systems. A fundamental consideration in choosing
between pair gain systems and remote switching involves the traffic volumes and calling patterns
within the small community.
The first two digital pair-gain systems used in the Bell System were the subscriber loop multiplex
(SLM) system and, its successor, the subscriber loop carrier (SLC-40) system. Although these
systems used a form of voice digitization (delta modulation) different from that used in T-carrier
systems (pulse code modulation), they both used standard T1 repeaters for digital transmission at
1.544 Mbps. Both systems also converted the digitized voice signals back into individual analog in-
terfaces at the end office switch to achieve system transparency. Notice that the SLM system
provided both concentration and multiplexing (80 subscribers for 24 channels) while the SLC-40
was strictly a multiplexer (40 subscribers assigned in a one-to-one manner to 40 channels).
ITU Digital Hierarchy
Level Number Number of Voice Multiplexer Bit Rate (Mbps)
Circuits Designation
E1 30 2.048
E2 120 M12 8,448
E3 480 M23 34.368
E4 1920 M34 139.264
E5 7680 M45 565.148
The SLM and SLC-40 systems used delta modulation voice coding because it was simpler than
pulse code modulation as used in T1 systems and was therefore less costly to implement on a per-
channel basis a desirable feature for modular system implementations. The original T1 systems, on
the other hand, minimized electronics costs by using common encoders and decoders, which
precluded implementation of less than 24 channels (an unnecessary feature in an interoffice
application). By the late 1970s low-cost, integrated circuit implementations of standard pulse code
modulation became available that led the way to the first (1979) installation of the SLC-96, a sub-
scriber carrier system using voice coding that was compatible with T1 systems and the emerging
digital end office switching machines.
The SLC-96 system (which is functionally equivalent to four T1 lines) can interface directly with a
digital end office and not be demultiplexed into 24 distinct analog interfaces. Thus this capability,
which is referred to as integrated digital loop carrier (IDLC), greatly reduces the prove-in distance
where the digital carrier becomes less expensive than separate subscriber pairs.
Data under Voice
After the technology of T-carrier systems had been established, AT&T began offering leased digital
transmission services for data communications. This service, known as Dataphone Digital Service
(DDS), uses T1 transmission links with special terminals (channel banks) that provide direct access
to the digital line. An initial drawback of DDS arose because T-carrier systems were originally used
only for exchange area and short toll network trunks. Without some form of long-distance digital
transmission, the digital circuits in separate exchange areas could not be interconnected. AT&T’s
original response to long-distance digital transmission was the development of a special radio
terminal called the 1A radio digital terminal (1A-RDT). This terminal encoded one DS1 signal
(1.544 Mbps) into less than 500 kHz of bandwidth. As shown in Figure, a signal of this bandwidth
was inserted below the lowest frequency of a master group multiplex. Since this frequency band is
normally unused in TD or TH analog radio systems, the DS1 signal could be added to existing
analog routes without displacing any voice channels. The use of frequencies below those used for
voice signals leads to the designation “data under voice” (DUV).
It is important to point out that DUV represented a special development specifically intended for
data transmission and not for voice services. In fact, DUV was used only to provide long-distance
digital transmission facilities for DDS.
PULSE TRANSMISSION
All digital transmission systems are designed around some particular form of pulse response. Even
carrier systems must ultimately produce specific pulse shapes at the detection circuitry of the
receiver. As a first step, consider the perfectly square pulse shown in Figure 4.1. The frequency
spectrum corresponding to the rectangular pulse is derived in Appendix A and shown in Figure 4.2.
It is commonly referred to as a sin(x)/x response:
Figure 4.38 Use of reverse loop to circumvent link failures in TDM loops.
Switch Switch
Figure 4.37. Functional mesh, fiber loop and ADMs
One obvious limitation of a loop is its vulnerability to failures of any link or node. The effect of a
node failure can be minimized by having bypass capabilities included in each node. When bypassed,
a node becomes merely a regenerative repeater, as on T-carrier transmission links. Link failures can
be circumvented by providing alternate facilities. Figure 4.38 shows one particular structure using a
second, reverse-direction loop to provide backup capabilities in the case of failures. When fully
operational, the network can use the reverse loop as a separate, independent network for traffic as
needed. Whenever a failure occurs, the nodes adjacent to the break establish a new loop by
connecting the forward path to the reverse path at both places. Hence all nodes continue to have full
connectivity to any node on the new loop.
A particular example of the use of the dual reverse loop for both protection and distributed
queued access to the channels is the distributed queued dual-bus (DQDB) system developed by
QPSX in Australia and standardized by the IEEE as an 802.6 metropolitan area network.
SONET/SDH
The first generations of fiber optic systems in the public telephone network used proprietary
architectures, equipment, line codes, multiplexing formats, and maintenance procedures. Some
commonality with other systems in the network came from suppliers who also supplied digital radio
systems. In these cases, the multiplexing formats and maintenance protocols emulated counterparts
in the radio systems, which also had proprietary architectures. The only thing in common with all of
the radio and fiber systems from all of the suppliers was that the interface to the network was some
number of DS3 cross-connect signals. Proprietary multiplexing formats for multiple DS3 signals
evolved because there was no higher level standard compatible with the applications. A DS4 signal,
which is composed of six DS3 signals, requires too much bandwidth for radio systems and carries a
larger cross section of channels (4032) than needed in many applications.
The Regional Bell Operating Companies and interexchange carriers (IXCs), the users of the
equipment, naturally wanted standards so they could mix and match equipment from different
suppliers. This became particularly important as a result of competition among the IXCs who
desired fiber interfaces to the local exchange carriers (LECs) but did not want to necessarily buy
from the same suppliers as the LECs. (It might be necessary for an IXC to interface with a different
supplier at each LEC.) To solve these problems, and others, Bellcore initiated an effort that was
later taken up by the T1X1 committee of the Exchange Carriers Standards Association (ECS A) to
establish a standard for connecting one fiber system to another at the optical level (i.e., “in the
glass”). This standard is referred to as the synchronous optical network (SONET). In the late stages
of the development of this standard, CCITT became involved so that a single international standard
exists for fiber interconnect between telephone networks of different counties. Internationally, the
standard is known as the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH), The SONET standard addresses the
following specific issues:
1. Establishes a standard multiplexing format using some number of 51.84-Mbps (STS-1) signals
as building blocks.
2. Establishes an optical signal standard for interconnecting equipment from different suppliers.
The VT structures can be individually assigned to carry one of four types of signals. Depending
on the data rate of a particular signal, more than one signal may be carried within a VT structure as
a VT group. All signals within a VT group must be of the same type, but VT groups within a single
SPE can be different types. The particular lower rate signals accommodated as VTs are listed in
Table. The last column indicates how many of the lower rate signals are carried in a single SPE if all
seven VT groups are the same type.
VT-SPE payloads are allowed to float within an STS-1 SPE in the same fashion as pointers to
SPE payloads are allowed to float at the STS-1 level. Thus, a second level of pointer logic is defined
for VT payloads. Again, a floating VT-SPE allows for minimal framing delays at intermediate
nodes and for frequency justification of VT-SPEs undergoing transitions between timing
boundaries. High-rate VT-SPEs are accommodated by inserting an information byte into V3 while
slow-rate VT-SPEs are accommodated by stuffing into the information byte immediately following
V3 when necessary.
Each VT1.5 uses three columns of data to establish 108 bytes in a VT1.5 payload. There are four
such payloads in a 12-column VT group. The VI, V2, V3, V4 bytes of the payload have fixed
positions within the STS-1 payload. The remaining 104 bytes of the VT 1.5 signal constitute the
VT1.5 payload, the start of which is the V5 byte pointed to by VI and V2.
Asynchronous Mapping
The DS1 bit stream is inserted into the information bits (I) with no relationship to the VT-SPE
frame or byte boundaries. As indicated, there are two stuffing opportunities (Si and S2) available in
every four-frame superframe. Thus, the VT1.5 superframe carries 771,772, or 773 information bits
depending on the value of the stuff control bits C1 and C2. The nominal number of information bits
in each frame is 193 x 4 = 772. Nominal frames carry information in S2 while stuffing in Sj.
The BER objective is 1 x 10“10 for optical sections of 40 km or less. Equipment from separate
manufacturers can be freely interchanged for applications with distances up to 25 km. Longer
distances may require joint engineering.
SONET systems are specified to operate with central wavelengths at 1310 nm with SMF fibers or
at 1550 nm with DS-SMF fibers. Operation at 1310 nm with DS-SMF fibers or at 1550 nm with
SMF fibers is not disallowed but must be jointly engineered. A range of laser wavelength tolerances
and maximum allowable spectral widths is
Representative Maximum Spectra Widths of SONET Sources
specified for both 1310 and 1550 nm. Table 8.10 provides representative values of the
specifications.
SONET Networks
A basic block diagram of a SONET network is shown in Figure. Gateway network elements
(GNEs) provide interfaces to external (asynchronous) digital signals. These signals are mapped
(synchronized) and unmapped (desynchronized) by the gateway using the appropriate mapping
format. At this point only bit stuffing is used to synchronize the asynchronous tributaries to
SONET. No pointer adjustments occur in the GNE. As the STS-N signals propagate through the
network, pointer adjustments in pointer processing (PP) interfaces may be applied at internal
network elements (NEs), but the lower level interface mappings that occur at the GNEs are
untouched. If a particular NE accesses VT payloads, VT payloads in the same VT group that pass
through the node may experience VT pointer adjustments. Otherwise, V.T pointer adjustments do
not occur (only the STS-1 level signals are rate adjusted). The following paragraphs summarize
pointer processing aspects of a SONET network:
1. Pointer justification events (PJEs) never occur in an originating GNE.
2. A desynchronizer experiences continuous PJEs only as a result of a synchronization difference
between the originating GNE and the terminating