HR Audit
HR Audit
The word “audit” comes from the Latin verb audire , which means, to listen.
Listening implies an attempt to know the state of the affairs as they exist and as
they are expected/ promised to exist. Auditing as a formal process is rooted in
this feature of listening. Consequently, it is a diagnostic tool to gauge not only the
current status of things but also the gaps between the current status and the
desired status in the area that is being audited.
Auditing has been a routine exercise in the area of finance, especially because it is
a statutory obligation. However, in case of Human Resource, there is no legal
binding to adopt auditing. Some of the companies nevertheless prefer to have
Human Resource audits.
Like any audit, the Human Resource Audit is also a systematic formal process,
which is designed to examine the strategies, policies, procedures, documentation,
structure, systems and practices with respect to the organization’s human
resource management. It systematically and scientifically assesses the strengths,
limitations, and developmental needs of the existing human resources from the
larger point of view of enhancing organizational performance.
The human resource audit is based on the premise that human resource
processes are dynamic and must continually be redirected and revitalized to
remain responsive to the ever changing needs. Human Resource Audits are not
routine practices aimed at problem solving. Instead of directly solving problems,
HR audits, like financial audits, help in providing insights into possible causes for
current and future problems.
The findings of these audits aid decision making in the organisation and are
usually internal documents that need not necessarily be shared with the public.
Moreover, unlike Financial Audits that are routine, regulated and standardised,
Human Resource Audits are non-routine and may be designed to cater to the
unique needs of the organisation at a particular point in time. These are in fact,
studies of an unusual nature. The manner in which the Audit is conducted could
vary from self-directed surveys to interventions by outside consultants.
Definition:
Human Resource Audit means the systematic verification of job analysis and
design, recruitment and selection, orientation and placement, training and
development, performance appraisal and job evaluation, employee and executive
remuneration, motivation and morale, participative management,
communication, welfare and social security, safety and health, industrial relations,
trade unionism, and disputes and their resolution. HR audit is very much useful to
achieve the organizational goal and also is a vital tool which helps to assess the
effectiveness of HR functions of an organization.
________________________________________
“the process of identifying and measuring data about human resources and
communicating this information to interested parties”.
HRA, thus, not only involves measurement of all the costs/ investments
associated with the recruitment, placement, training and develop ent of
employees, but also the quantification of the economic value of the people in an
organisation.
Flamholtz (1971) too has offered a similar definition for HRA. They define HRA as
“the measurement and reporting of the cost and value of people in organizational
resources”.
Who should conduct the audit?
The team that is responsible for the audit should represent a cross-section of the
organization’s staff, including line staff, middle and upper management, and
those responsible for HR functions.
________________________________________
The commonly understood audits are the established and regular accounting
audits carried out in accordance with specific statutory regulations. However, in
the case of human resource audits, there is no legal obligation, but enlightened
managements have voluntarily accepted its usefulness depending upon the
circumstances. The following circumstances may be cited as examples:
It is necessary to take a look at these and other questions. Human Resource audit
is highly useful for the purpose
• Does the organisation regularly forecast the supply of and demand for
employees in various categories?
1. Comparative approach
3. Statistical approach
4. Compliance approach
Comparative approach
In this, the auditors identify Competitor Company as the model. The results of
their organization are compared with that Company/ industry.
Outside authority approach
In this, the auditors use standards set by an outside consultant as benchmark for
comparison of own results.
Statistical approach
Compliance approach
In this, auditors review past actions to calculate whether those activities comply
with legal requirements and industry policies and procedures.
________________________________________
1. How effective is the selection process in ensuring that people are placed in
appropriate positions? Explain.
4. How effective are the training, development, and career planning activities
in driving performance? Explain.
7. How effective are the training, development, and career planning activities
in preparing people for selection and placement into new positions in the
organization? Explain.
8. Overall, how effectively are the five components integrated and mutually
supportive? Explain.
• Does the chart include both employees’ names and position titles?
HR Department Organization
• Is the department sufficiently staffed for the industry and the size of
organization?
• Is the budget in line with other organizations of similar size and industry?
• Is the HR mission statement consistent with the vision and mission of the
organization?
2. Should the HR Department be responsible for all of the functions listed above?
3. Should the HR Department be responsible for functions that are not listed
above?