CAME v2
CAME v2
ANYBODY'S* CONTINUING
AIRWORTHINESS MANAGEMENT
EXPOSITION (CAME)
*Insert Name of Approved Organisation
Telephone Number:
Facsimile Number:
Email Address:
3) All material contained within this document is for guidance purposes only. It
is descriptive not prescriptive in content. Organisations may choose which
parts of the text they wish to adopt/adapt expanding the content where
necessary to reflect their processes. All references in italics and red font are
for editorial guidance to aid an organisation in drafting a CAME that would
accurately reflect their situation.
4) After completing the draft CAME the organisation should correlate each
section with the Compliance Check List* (CCL) provided as part of the
application pack. Thus demonstrating to the Regional Office responsible that
they have fully addressed all applicable paragraphs of Part M within the CAME.
The completed CCL should then be appended to the CAME as Appendix 5.9.
SPECIMEN EXPOSITION
This specimen Exposition has been prepared for the guidance of those wishing to obtain a
Part M Subpart G approval. The contents relate directly to the requirements of Part M and are
based on the example of Exposition contents shown in Appendix V to AMC M.A.704.
The text of this guide has been arranged so that each subject is dealt with insofar as AMC
material defines it. Notes and bracketed information are used to explain the recommended
text and suggest ways in which the organisation might expand it to suit its own purposes. It
will be appreciated that no single specimen Exposition can meet the needs of all types and
sizes of organisation or, indeed, reflect the different organisational structures and corporate
policies, which emerge as companies develop.
TABLE OF CONTENT
INTRODUCTION
Frontispiece
Table of Content
List of Effective Pages
Amendment Record
Distribution List
Abbreviations Used
Part 5 Appendices
Part 6 Addendum
AMENDMENT RECORD
DISTRIBUTION LIST
(The document should include a distribution list to ensure proper distribution of the
manual and to demonstrate to the competent authority that all personnel involved in
continuing airworthiness has access to the relevant information.
This does not mean that all personnel have to be in receipt of a manual but that a
reasonable amount of manuals are distributed within the organisation(s) so that the
concerned personnel may have quick and easy access to this manual.
ABBREVIATIONS USED
Examples below
AD......................Airworthiness Directive
ADD....................Acceptable Deferred Defect
AMSD.................Aircraft Maintenance Standards Department
AOC...................Air Operator's Certificate
AOG...................Aircraft on Ground
AWOPS…………All Weather Operations
BSI.....................British Standards Institute
CAA....................Civil Aviation Authority
CAME.................Continuing Airworthiness Management Exposition
C of A.................Certificate of Airworthiness
CDL....................Configuration Deviation List
CRS....................Certificate of Release to Service
ETOPS...............Extended Range Twin Operations
EASA..................European Aviation Safety Agency
MEL....................Minimum Equipment List
MNPS.................Minimum Navigation Performance Service
MO.....................Maintenance Organisation
MOE...................Maintenance Organisation Exposition
MPD...................Maintenance Planning Document
MP......................Maintenance Programme
RNAV……………Area Navigation
RVSM…………...Reduced Verticle Separation Minima
SB......................Service Bulletin
SIL......................Service Instruction Leaflet
SMI.....................Scheduled Maintenance Inspection
SRP....................Sector Record Page
This exposition defines the organisation and procedures upon which the M.A.
Subpart G approval of Joe Bloggs under Part-M is based.
These procedures are approved by the undersigned and must be complied with, as
applicable; in order to ensure that all the continuing airworthiness activities including
maintenance for aircraft managed by Joe Bloggs is carried out on time to an
approved standard.
It is accepted that these procedures do not override the necessity of complying with
any new or amended regulation published by the Agency or the competent authority
from time to time where these new or amended regulations are in conflict with these
procedures.
The CAA will approve this organisation whilst the CAA is satisfied that the
procedures are being followed. It is understood that the CAA reserves the right to
suspend, vary or revoke the M.A. Subpart G continuing airworthiness management
approval of the organisation, as applicable, if the CAA has evidence that the
procedures are not followed and the standards not upheld.
(2) Consortia
(Where the organisation belongs to a consortium, it should be indicated here.
The other members of the consortium should be specified, as well as the
scope of organisation of the consortium [e.g. operations, maintenance, design
(modifications and repairs), production etc...]. The reason for specifying this is
that consortium maintenance may be controlled through specific contracts
and through consortium’s policy and/or procedures manuals that might
unintentionally override the maintenance contracts. In addition, in respect of
international consortiums, the respective competent authorities should be
consulted and their agreement to the arrangement clearly stated. This
paragraph should then make reference to any consortium’s continuing
airworthiness related manual or procedure and to any competent authority
agreement that would apply.)
Aircraft type/series
Date included in the scope of work
Aircraft maintenance programme or ‘generic/baseline’ maintenance
programme
Aircraft registration(s)
Owner/ operator
CAMO contract reference
d) Type of operation
(This paragraph should give broad information on the type of operations such
as: commercial air transport operations, (commercial) specialised operations,
training organisation, NCC, NCO, long haul/short haul/regional,
scheduled/charter, regions/countries/continents flown, etc)
a) Accountable manager
(This paragraph should address the duties and responsibilities of the
accountable manager as far as Part M.A. subpart G is concerned and
demonstrate that he has corporate authority for ensuring that all continuing
airworthiness activities can be financed and carried out to the required
standard.)
(Note: According to the size and complexity of the organisation, this table may be
further developed or simplified)
Continuing
---------- Marketing Operations
airworthiness
The accountable manager (or any delegated person such as the engineering
director or the quality manager) will notify to the competent authority any
change concerning:
(1) the company’s name and location(s)
(2) the group of person as specified in paragraph 0.3.c)
(3) operations, procedures and technical arrangements, as far as they may
affect the approval.
Joe Bloggs will not incorporate such change until the change have been
assessed and approved by the competent authority.)
(1) General
(It may be useful to remind, in this introduction paragraph, the purpose of
the aircraft technical log system and/or continuing airworthiness record
system, with special care to the options of M.A.305 and M.A.306 For that
purpose, paragraphs of M.A.305 and M.A.306 may be quoted or further
explained.)
b) M.E.L. application
(The MEL is a document not controlled by the CAMO and the decision of
whether accepting or not the operation with a defect deferred in
accordance with the MEL is normally the responsibility of the operating
crew. This paragraph should explain in sufficient detail the MEL
application procedure, because the MEL is a tool that the personnel
involved in continuing airworthiness and maintenance have to be familiar
with in order to ensure proper and efficient communication with the crew
in case of a defect rectification to be deferred.)
(This paragraph does not apply to those types of aircraft that do not have
an MEL.)
(1) General
(This paragraph should explain broadly what a MEL document is. The
information could be extracted from the aircraft flight manual.)
(3) Application
(This paragraph should explain how the maintenance personnel identify a
MEL limitation to the crew. This should refer to the technical log
procedures)
a) General
(This introductory paragraph should remind that the purpose of a
maintenance programme is to provide maintenance planning instructions
necessary for the safe operation of the aircraft.)
b) Content
(This paragraph should explain what is [are] the format[s] of the aircraft
maintenance programme[s]. Appendix I to AMC M.A.302 (a) and M.B.301 (d)
should be used as a guideline to develop this paragraph.)
c) Development
(1) Sources
(This paragraph should explain what are the sources [MRB, MPD,
Maintenance Manual, etc..] used for the development of an aircraft
maintenance programme.)
(2) Responsibilities
b) Records
(This paragraph should give in detail the type of company documents that are
required to be recorded and what are the recording period requirements for
each of them. This can be provided by a table or series of tables that would
include the following:
- Family of document [if necessary],
- Name of document,
- Retention period,
- Responsible person for retention,
- Place of retention,)
c) Preservation of records
(This paragraph should set out the means provided to protect the records
from fire, floods, etc.. as well as the specific procedures in place to guarantee
that the records will not been altered during the retention period [especially for
the computer record].)
The paragraph should also indicate by whom and how these data are
analysed, what is the decision process to take action and what kind of action
could be taken. This may include:
- amendment of the maintenance programme,
- amendment of maintenance or operational procedures,
- etc...)
a) Analysis
(This paragraph should explain how the defect reports provided by the
contracted maintenance organisations are processed by the continuing
airworthiness management organisation. Analysis should be conducted in
order to give elements to activities such as maintenance programme evolution
and non mandatory modification policy.)
Where the organisation has a DOA capability under Part 21, it should be
indicated here and the related manuals should be referred to.)
b) Quality plan
(This paragraph should show how the quality plan is established. The quality
plan will consist of a quality audit and sampling schedule that should cover all
the areas specific to Part M in a definite period of time. However, the
scheduling process should also be dynamic and allow for special evaluations
when trends or concerns are identified. In case of sub-contracting, this
paragraph should also address the planning of the auditing of subcontractors
at the same frequency as the rest of the organisation.)
PART 5 APPENDICES
Part 6 Addendum
The following changes have been made to Part M but have not yet been included in:
AMC to Part-M: Appendix V to AMC M.A. 704 - Continuing Airworthiness
Management Exposition Where necessary the entries for the following should be
added to the CAME.
M.A.302(h)
5. The aircraft maintenance programme shall be reviewed at least annually. This
review of the maintenance programme shall be performed either:
— by the person who performs the airworthiness review of the aircraft in accordance
with point M. A.710(ga), or
— by the M.A. Subpart G organisation managing the continuing airworthiness of the
aircraft in those cases where the review of the maintenance programme is not
performed in conjunction with an airworthiness review.
If the review shows discrepancies on the aircraft linked to deficiencies in the content
of the maintenance programme, the person performing the review shall inform the
competent authority of the Member State of registry and the owner shall amend the
maintenance programme as agreed with such competent authority.
M.A.710(ga)
For ELA1 aircraft not involved in commercial operations for which the aircraft
maintenance programme has been established in accordance with M.A.302(h), the
aircraft maintenance programme shall be reviewed in conjunction with the
airworthiness review. This review shall be accomplished by the person who
performed the airworthiness review.
M.A.710(h)
Should the outcome of the airworthiness review be inconclusive or should the review
under point M. A.710(ga) show discrepancies on the aircraft linked to deficiencies in
the content of the maintenance programme, the competent authority shall be
informed by the organisation as soon as practicable but in any case within 72 hours
from the moment the organisation identifies the condition to which the review relates.
The airworthiness review certificate shall not be issued until all findings have been
closed.