Scribd
Upload
420 views1 page

MRR3

The document discusses the aftermath and potential weaknesses of sustainable development goals (SDGs). It notes that while SDGs aim to eliminate environmental harms, they may also create new issues that negatively impact both humans and the environment. It raises questions about how components of the SDGs could have cruel unintended consequences, whether the UN fully understood the impact of each component, and how large of an issue population growth presents.

Uploaded by

Jannah Francine Balingit
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
420 views1 page

MRR3

The document discusses the aftermath and potential weaknesses of sustainable development goals (SDGs). It notes that while SDGs aim to eliminate environmental harms, they may also create new issues that negatively impact both humans and the environment. It raises questions about how components of the SDGs could have cruel unintended consequences, whether the UN fully understood the impact of each component, and how large of an issue population growth presents.

Uploaded by

Jannah Francine Balingit
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

The Aftermath

The vulnerability can be for a person and situation. Every decision has its

aftermath. And for our society, sustainable development goals have weak sides, which

will challenge the goals and the growth of the country. The topic will show us a different

view of the SDGs.

The three things that I significantly learned from the reading are the goods that

the SDGs have will eliminate the environment that we have to live in. It may have its

purpose to bring us in good, but the possibilities of bad are also in it. And the victims of

this unsustainability are both human and non-human.

The three things that are still unclear to me are the anthropocentrically motivated

protection, environmental justice, and biosphere egalitarianism and the ethical

consideration between it.

I used to think that sustainable development goals have a hold of control in the

success of development with the SDGs. I am somewhat in favor of SDGs because its

components are highly intact and straightforward. The SDGs mean no harm in the way

it is presented, but looking closely, the people are not the focus, and the victim is our

home, Earth.

The three questions that I want to ask about the reading article are how come

that it looks very pleasing to see the cruelness of the SDGs? Did the United Nations

know the consequences of each component? How big of a problem a population is?

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy