Scribd
Upload
39 views3 pages

Annexe 3 - Evaluation of Proposals: (A) Thalammehera Feeder - A1

This document evaluates several proposed actions to improve the performance of multiple feeders by reducing losses and improving voltage levels. For each feeder and proposed action, it provides the estimated loss savings in kW, the improvement in voltage level as a percentage of the nominal voltage, the net present cost of the project, the net present value of loss savings, and the net present value of the project. The proposed actions include load balancing, converting single and two phase lines to three phase, changing tap positions, establishing new transformers and feeders, and replacing conductor sections.

Uploaded by

Kalum Chandra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
39 views3 pages

Annexe 3 - Evaluation of Proposals: (A) Thalammehera Feeder - A1

This document evaluates several proposed actions to improve the performance of multiple feeders by reducing losses and improving voltage levels. For each feeder and proposed action, it provides the estimated loss savings in kW, the improvement in voltage level as a percentage of the nominal voltage, the net present cost of the project, the net present value of loss savings, and the net present value of the project. The proposed actions include load balancing, converting single and two phase lines to three phase, changing tap positions, establishing new transformers and feeders, and replacing conductor sections.

Uploaded by

Kalum Chandra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Annex 3

ANNEXE 3 - EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS


Loss V.I as% NP NP 0f NPV
Proposed action Savin of Cost of Loss of
g Nominal Project Saving Project
kW voltages (MRs) (MRs) (MRs)

1 Load balancing of the feeder 1 80 0.08 1.64 1.56

2 All 1Ph and 2Ph lines are conversion to 3Ph 1 89 0.81 1.63 0.82

3 Changing the shekel point of feederE2 and 1 83 0.101 1.64 1.539


feederB1and load balancing

4 Changing the Tap position of TF 0 77 0 0 0

5 Establishing a TF for feeder end and load 2 99 3.80 3.69 -0.11


balancing (1.2 km Racoon line)
6 Introducing a separate feeder and selected 1ph 2 98 0.75 3.69 2.94
lines are conversion to 3Ph and load balancing

(a) THALAMMEHERA FEEDER -A1 Loss V.I as% NP NP 0f NPV


Proposed action Savin of Cost of Loss of
g Nominal Project Saving Project
kW voltages (MRs) (MRs) (MRs)

1 Loads balancing of the feeders 0 73 0.19 0 -0.19

2 All 1Ph and 2Ph lines are conversion to 3Ph 1 85 1.25 1.78 0.53

3 Changing the Tap positions of TFs and load 0 72 0 0 0


balancing
4 Changing the shekel point of feederE2 and 0 79 0.203 0 -0.07
feederB1and load balancing
5 Introducing separate feeders and selected 1ph 2 91 1.63 4.10 2.47
lines are conversion to 3Ph and load balancing
of both feeders.
6 Filling the gap(0.070km) by fly conductor, 1 88 0.27 1.90 1.63
among section E34 and B18 and load
balancing
7 Establishing a TF for feeder end and load 4 98 2.80 8 5.2
balancing (0.350km Racoon line)

Loss V.I as% NP NP 0f NPV


Proposed action Savin of Cost of Loss of
g Nominal Project Saving Project

LV Development Study
kW voltages (MRs) (MRs) (MRs)

1 Loads balancing of the feeders 0 73 0.21 0 -0.21

2 All 1Ph and 2Ph lines are conversion to 3Ph 1 90 1.45 1.63 0.22

3 Changing the Tap positions of TFs and load 0 76 0 0 0


balancing
4 Changing the jumper point of feederD1and 0 79 0.255 0 -0.255
feederB2 and load balancing
5 Introducing separate feeders and selected 1ph 2 94 1.51 3.38 1.87
lines are conversion to 3Ph and load balancing
of both feeders.
6 Filling the gap(0.390km) by fly conductor, 2 96 0.854 3.38 2.53
among section E34 and B18 and load
balancing
7 Establishing a TF for feeder end and load 2 98 3.12 3.38 0.26
balancing (1.05 Racoon line)
Loss V.I as% NP NP 0f NPV
Proposed action Savin of Cost of Loss of
g Nominal Project Saving Project
kW voltages (MRs) (MRs) (MRs)

1 Load balancing of the feeder 1 88 0.07 1.63 1.56

2 All 1Ph and 2Ph lines are conversion to 3Ph 1 90 1.23 1.63 0.82

3 Changing the Tap position of TF 0 82 0 0 0

4 Establishing a TF for feeder end and load 2 99 3.40 3.08 -0.32


balancing (1.35km Racoon line)
5 Introducing a separate feeder and selected 1ph 2 97 0.25 3.08 2.83
lines are conversion to 3Ph and load balancing

(c) KEKILLAPITIYAFEEDER- D1& MAHOLOWA FEEDER-B2

Annex 3

Loss V.I as% NP NP 0f NPV


Proposed action Savin of Cost of Loss of
g Nominal Project Saving Project
kW voltages (MRs) (MRs) (MRs)

LV Development Study
1 Load balancing of the feeder 0 93 0.065 0 -1.065

2 All 1Ph and 2Ph lines are conversion to 3Ph 1 95 1.34 3.52 2.2

3 Changing the Tap position of TF 0 92 0 0 0

4 Establishing a TF for feeder end and load 1 99 3.40 3.54 -0.32


balancing (1.35km Racoon line)
5 Introducing a separate feeder and selected 1ph 1 99 0.63 3.54 2.91
lines are conversion to 3Ph and load balancing

(e) DEBARALIYADDA FEEDER -C3

LV Development Study

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy