Digital Manufacturing - Escaping Pilot Purgatory
Digital Manufacturing - Escaping Pilot Purgatory
Manufacturing –
escaping pilot
purgatory
Digital
Manufacturing –
escaping pilot
purgatory
Contents
Executive summary 6
Part I: Key findings from the Digital Manufacturing Global Expert Survey 2018 8
A clear majority of manufacturing companies have already successfully piloted digital solutions 9
For most manufacturing companies, advancing beyond the pilot phase is still a big challenge 10
Part II: Our perspective on the three principles of escaping pilot purgatory 12
Outlook 19
Contributors 22
The global race for innovation leadership in Digital Manufacturing 1 is picking up pace: two
thirds of industrial companies worldwide say that digitizing the production value chain is
one of their highest priorities. To achieve this goal, companies are actively pursuing a broad
range of Digital Manufacturing use cases in three areas:
Connectivity. Enabling the flow of relevant information to the right decision makers in
real time. Examples include digital performance management and the use of augmented
reality to communicate interactive work instructions and SOPs.
Despite this focus and enthusiasm, McKinsey’s collaboration with the World Economic
Forum on the “future of production” has shown that many companies are experiencing
“pilot purgatory” in which they have significant activity underway, but are not yet seeing
meaningful bottom-line benefits from this.
To more fully understand how manufacturers across the globe are approaching their Digital
Manufacturing transformation and the challenges they are facing, McKinsey has conducted
its fourth Digital Manufacturing Global Expert Survey (Box 1). The results of this survey
provide interesting insights into how manufacturers’ approaches differ across the world, as
well as concerning behaviors that are contributing to “pilot purgatory.”
In Part I of this report, we share the results our 2018 survey. These show largely continued
levels of enthusiasm and prioritization related to capturing benefits from Digital Manufac-
turing with notable acceleration in China and India and regression in Japan. However, while
there is significant importance placed on the topic and many pilots have been launched across
a range of use cases, less than a third of respondents cite having moved critical use cases –
such as digital performance management – into large-scale rollout. At the same time, more
than 90% of surveyed companies believe that they are either at the forefront of Digital
Manufacturing in their industry or, at least, on par with the competition.
In Part II, we offer perspectives on six success factors that manufacturers who are
demonstrating at-scale impact from Digital Manufacturing are following. These factors
span the transformation categories of process, infrastructure, and organization:
Process
“Approach the opportunity ‘bottom-line value backwards’ – rather than technology forward”
“Establish a clear vision and change story for how Digital Manufacturing will create
competitive advantage and develop a phased road map and business case”
1 In this report, we use this term, broadly defined, to encompass similar terms such as Industry 4.0
and Smart Manufacturing.
“Form an early view on the comprehensive target-state technology stack that is scalable
and analytics-enabled and supports the Digital Manufacturing road map”
“Build and lead a focused ecosystem of technology partners to rigorously manage the
building of the stack”
Organization
“Drive the transformation from the top (and via P&L owners) and coordinate
implementation widely – do not treat it as an isolated IT implementation effort”
“Get ahead of the capability gap – build the skills to achieve impact and the culture to
sustain it.”
Over 700 qualified respondents from companies with more than 50 employees and over
USD 10 million in revenues, spanning a range of industry sectors from automotive to
chemicals to transport and logistics
Impact, strategy, key solutions, and implementation approach assessed for seven key
markets (Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, and the USA)
Exhibit 1 Most organizations feel themselves ahead or at the same level as competitors
How do you feel you are placed relative to most of the competitors in your industry
with respect to implementing and capturing value from Digital Manufacturing?
Percent
We are ahead We are on We are behind
of our competitors the same level our competitors
Brazil 32 58 10
China 52 41 7
France 28 58 14
Germany 28 64 8
India 47 48 5
Japan 12 61 27
USA 38 57 5
At the same time, the idea of Digital Manufacturing has held its importance among companies
in the industry (Exhibit 2). More than two thirds of respondents report that Digital Manufac-
turing is at the top of their operations-strategy agenda. There is a fair amount of variation by
region, but for most, Digital Manufacturing is a global priority. Respondents from Japanese
manufacturers are the outliers here. Not only are they the least likely to identify Digital Manu-
facturing as a top organizational priority, they also are accordingly the least likely to see their
organizations as winning the Digital Manufacturing race.
The picture of where manufacturing companies stand today regarding Digital Manufacturing
is a useful snapshot, but an understanding of changes in attitude over time is at least equally
illuminating. In this context, it is noteworthy that – after an all-time high in 2017 – optimism
about Digital Manufacturing’s potential has plateaued for the first time in China, the USA,
and Germany. In Japan, enthusiasm has dropped off significantly from what already had been
clearly the lowest level of all four countries in which this attitude was measured.
China 87 13
Low priority
10 France 55 45
Average
Germany 69 31
22
68 India 94 6
Japan 31 69
Exhibit 3 High levels of relevance and conducted pilots across all Digital Manufacturing levers –
degree of adoption seems to be consistent across levers
Relevance
Pilot phase (or advanced)
Across industry sectors and categories, Digital Manufacturing
solutions are adopted consistently
Percent
Connectivity Connectivity groups Digital Manufacturing
85 solutions that improve and facilitate
operational performance, manage-
ment, and everyday collaboration of
64 employees (such as augmented reality
and digital performance management)
In many cases, companies are piloting multiple digital solutions simultaneously (Exhibit 4).
The global average is eight solutions, but the number varies widely by country. While Indian
manufacturers report, on average, piloting more than ten Digital Manufacturing technolo-
gies at any given time, companies in Japan are, on average, piloting only about four.
How many different Digital Manufacturing solutions are you already piloting
in your organization?
Number of different solutions
Brazil 8.9
China 10.2
France 6.7
Germany 6.9
India 10.6
Japan 4.1
USA 8.5
Average 8.0
SOURCE: McKinsey Digital Manufacturing Global Expert Survey 2018
What’s more, an analysis of implementation success over time reveals that significantly
more companies are reporting successful piloting. Yet while success rates in implementing
Digital Manufacturing solutions increased rather strongly in China, the USA, and even
Japan, piloting success among German companies has stagnated.
For most manufacturing companies, advancing beyond the pilot phase is still
a big challenge
Even when companies report significant numbers of pilots, most cite significantly less
progress in terms of broader rollout (Exhibit 5). In fact, the gap between piloting and rollout
is significantly larger than the gap between perceived relevance and piloting, suggesting that
scaling is a bigger hurdle than getting the ball rolling.
At what stage are you with adopting specific Digital Manufacturing solutions
at your company?
Percent of relevant solutions
Connectivity
64
23
-41
24
-37
SOURCE: McKinsey Digital Manufacturing Global Expert Survey 2018
An analysis by sector shows that the newer, more technologically advanced areas of the
manufacturing sector (for example, industrial automation) are further ahead in the
implementation of Digital Manufacturing than older, more established areas such as paper
and packaging (Exhibit 6).
What we have learned from our research – which is also supported by our client experiences
and industry observations – is that companies often make the same missteps when it comes
to Digital Manufacturing strategy and implementation. In order to escape pilot purgatory
and to capture and sustain the value from digital technologies, we recommend that orga-
nizations focus on six success factors across three categories (Exhibit 7).
Exhibit 7 To escape pilot purgatory, organizations should keep 6 key success factors in mind
Approach digital holistically Build and lead a focused Get ahead of the capa-
with a clear vision and ecosystem of technology bility gap and build the
develop a phased road map partners culture to sustain it
SOURCE: McKinsey
Without a focus on solutions that have a high impact on the bottom line, organizations end
up pursuing an Digital Manufacturing journey that is financially not feasible. The following
success factors are directly tied to the ability of manufacturers to establish a solid business
case for the implementation of their Digital Manufacturing solutions.
With the plethora of Digital Manufacturing solutions on the market, it is easy for companies
to be led by what is exciting. Beginning with a clear view on how Digital Manufacturing
solutions can address operational pain points, creating competitive advantage and driving
bottom line impact is key to ensuring tangible returns:
The concern that a lack of vision is a significant obstacle to digital transformation has grown
over the last year. In 2017, only 15% of survey respondents saw a lack of vision as a significant
obstacle. Today, that share has climbed to 59%. Three principles can help manufacturing
companies create a real vision for Digital Manufacturing:
Think holistically. Look down the road – i.e., past an immediate fix – and beyond your
company – i.e., into the context of the entire ecosystem – and make technology decisions
based on what will build a long-term competitive advantage.
Create an ROI road map. To achieve the highest ROIs that come from scaling, the complexities
of the technology and use cases, the level of process and cultural change needed, and the
sizable investment required must be carefully managed. To this end, transformation requires
a road map. The road map should be based on both a clear definition of the size and nature of
the business opportunity and a precise understanding of the IT and operational technology
(OT) architecture and resourcing requirements. The good news is that today, more than 58%
of respondents report that they have a robust road map for implementation – compared to only
33% in 2017.
Situation Approach
A tier-1 automotive supplier requested The approach to supplier’s Digital Manufac-
McKinsey’s support in its digital trans- turing goals was based on the four pillars of a
formation, specifically to enable it to address digital transformation: strategy, organization,
and adopt the megatrends in the industry product development, and change management
related to products, services, and processes
Vision Impact
A comprehensive outlook for the supplier included The transformation equipped the supplier with
a perspective on how eight aspects would contribute the tools and structures it needed to reap the
to its Digital Manufacturing vision: value of Digital Manufacturing:
Digital products that boost revenue A digital road map charted the course to
10% in additional revenue and a 15% cost
IT and platforms that support rapid scale-up
reduction
Digital supply chain for end-to-end
A digital factory facilitated the scale-up of
efficiency
Internet of Things (IoT)/digital use cases
Capabilities to drive digital initiatives
A digital ecosystem of partners supports
Organizational culture that embraces digital ongoing innovation
transformation
Investments focused on growth-based
digital models
Business processes seamlessly integrated
with digital solutions
Global partnerships that complement
in-house capabilities
With the strategy and business factors sufficiently addressed, companies can focus on both the
critical influences of the technology stack and the importance of an effective technology ecosystem.
Digital Manufacturing is, by definition, “technology driven,” but more than 44% of respondents
point to IT deficiencies as a main challenge in successfully implementing those initiatives. In
defining the optimal technology stack, manufacturing companies should keep five principles
in mind:
Comprehensive. Definition should include a look at all five layers: collection, connectivity,
data, analytics, and applications. It should also be specific to your operational model.
Scalable. A critical element for scalability is the data ingestion pipeline complemented by
analytic capabilities.
Secure. Cybersecurity must be actively addressed by, for example, analyzing the connections
and adaptability between legacy and future systems.
The entire technology stack process – from development to rollout – must be tightly managed
to ensure cohesion and seamlessness. Manufacturing companies should keep sight of three
aspects of the process as they move forward:
Partnerships. Select a few partners that go deep in both functional and Partnerships can help man-
integrative expertise; co-developing when possible. More than 40% of age complexity, but more
respondents prefer to build their IT/OT systems in-house or tailor them than 40% of manufacturers
based on external sources. This contributes to the need to bridge a wide
prefer to build their stacks
range of systems that includes ones developed in-house, purchased from
in-house
vendors, or co-developed.
Situation Approach
A leading electronics manufacturer asked After analyzing the technology setup reference,
McKinsey to support in conducting Digital current and target architectures were designed
Manufacturing pilots and make the organization and a pilot road map made of two phases was
fit for the digital production system developed. The first phase addressed blocking
issues on critical design and infrastructure,
the second phase addressed the comprehensive
stack for a scalable foundational IT/OT platform
Findings Impact
Blocking issues were identified in two of the five To address these data-related barriers to Digital
areas of critical design and infrastructure Manufacturing implementation, the company
pursued two main initiatives
Data collection
Data/design centralization
—— No flexibility: each device has different
collection mechanisms, meaning data —— Consolidate infrastructure
cannot be properly ingested and stored —— Ensure reusability of solution across
for analyses all sites
—— No scalability: some of the point solutions, —— Begin perpetual storage of operational
specifically in scanner data, will prevent data for big data analytics
scaling to significantly larger data volumes Service-oriented architecture
—— Data delay: data delayed up to 30 to
45 minutes across the plant —— Create set of five to six services to be
used globally
Data structure —— Create dynamic visualizations based on
—— Data inaccuracy: some miscalculations Web-based (microservice) application
in jobs get repeated and exaggerated, that will decouple page creation for
affecting the accuracy of reports data storage
—— Lack of data history: neither consistent These initiatives resulted in
data archiving strategies nor mechanism
to store historic data for future modeling Reduced setup and maintenance cost by 90%
Reduced application development cost by 50%
of current model
Digitizing the production system represents tremendous change. While technology is the
obvious tool of a digital transformation, two success factors speak directly to the importance
of people in the success of the change initiative.
Capturing the full value potential from Digital Manufacturing requires a consistent
approach. Two principles help ensure this outcome:
Successful companies recognize the importance of new skill sets in their approach to digital
transformation as well as the importance of an organizational culture that facilitates
development:
Situation Approach
A state-of-the-art steel plant in the Netherlands After analyzing the status quo, we jointly
was looking for the next S-curve in continuous defined a vision for the digital-enabled steel
improvement and planned to fully digitize their plant. Then, a road map was developed to chart
operations. a robust implementation plan and direct the
transformation.
Apart from piloting new and promising
technologies in isolated projects, the client In a second step, use cases were prioritized, built,
wanted to follow a holistic approach to digitally tested, and scaled in multiple waves to ensure
transform the whole organization. quick impact and excite the organizations.
Two considerations, among others, have been In parallel, three imperatives helped lay the
capability building and the creation of a guiding foundation of the digital transformation:
vision to excite the organization from the develop capabilities, build the IT infrastructure,
beginning and create the advanced analytics ecosystem
Findings Impact
As capability building is central to digital Throughout the digital transformation, 200
transformations, the client’s digital capability practitioners were trained from all parts of
building is fundamental. We thus decided to the organization – from senior management
follow three main steps: at the executive level to individual work units,
including maintenance and local IT as well as
Create the analytics academy with a focus nontechnical functions
on intensifying the capability building of the
project team and continuous improvement. What’s more, a digital ecosystem was created
to ensure the transformation’s sustainable
Define and establish the three required roles for impact. Setting up this ecosystem comprised
the organization’s successful transformation: establishing and formalizing, amongst others,
advanced analytics translator, data scientist,
and data engineer. A
n internal networking community on
digital topics
Develop for each role the required tailored
Collaborations with knowledge institutions
learning journey with its specific internal
and external modules, such as cleaning and A
valuable proposition for digital talent and
structuring data. access to corresponding talent pools
Partnerships with start-ups and spin-offs
The move from the “current version” of factory production to Digital Manufacturing holds
the promise of significant value, and according to the results of McKinsey’s 2018 survey, this
shift is a top strategic priority for manufacturers across the globe. Despite the importance
placed on it, most manufacturers are struggling to take the Digital Manufacturing successes
they have experienced in limited pilots to a scale that would bring the full benefit of the
technology.
A holistic approach to Digital Manufacturing – one that considers the fundamentals of the
organization and the business as much as it focuses on the technology-related factors – can
help manufacturers get over the hurdles that stand between pilot success and company-
wide rollout.
The good news is that, as demonstrated by several real-world cases, a rollout is not a mystery,
and successes exist. These “lighthouses” have the power to help unify a manufacturer’s vision
of Digital Manufacturing. The knowledge from these case examples can also help build a solid
business case and chart the course for companywide implementation.
Our Digital Capability Centers (DCCs) provide a unique environment for companies
and their managers to see, touch, and better understand Digital Manufacturing in real
life. Learning to master core technologies such as IOT, advanced analytics, robotics, and
additive manufacturing, managers can eyewitness here the end-to-end transformation of
a simulated organization – from lean excellence into an industry leader with fully digitized
production processes. What’s more, the DCCs show live why and to what extent addressing
technical, management, and people systems in concert is crucial for the success of digital
transformations in general and for escaping pilot purgatory in particular.
Inspired by the critical role of its model factories in supporting lean transformations,
McKinsey has launched a global network of Digital Capability Centers with locations
in Aachen, Beijing, Chicago, Singapore, and Venice targeted at building Digital
Manufacturing skills across multiple levels of an organization, from executives to
the shop floor.
USA
Richard Kelly
Partner, Stamford
Richard_Kelly@mckinsey.com
+1 (203) 977 6939
Germany
Andreas Behrendt
Partner, Cologne
Andreas_Behrendt@mckinsey.com
+49 (221) 208 7262
China
Karel Eloot
Senior Partner, Shanghai
Karel_Eloot@mckinsey.com
+86 (21) 6132 3040
India
Kunwar Singh
Partner, Delhi
Kunwar_Singh@mckinsey.com
+91 (124) 661 1021
Brazil
Björn Hagemann
Partner, São Paulo
Bjoern_Hagemann@mckinsey.com
+55 (11) 5189 1613
Japan
Kenji Nabeshima
Partner, Tokyo
Kenji_Nabeshima@mckinsey.com
+81 (3) 5562 2690
France
Valerio Dilda
Partner, Paris
Valerio_Dilda@mckinsey.com
+33 (1) 4069 4275
Content
Andres Aramayo-Prudencio
Associate Partner, Mexico City
Michael Coxon
Associate Partner, Cleveland
Enno de Boer
Partner, New Jersey
Dondi De Ocampo
Director of Engineering, Chicago
Andras Kadocsa
Partner, Budapest
Bernhard Mühlreiter
Associate Partner, Vienna
Editorial team
Andreas Behrendt
Partner, Cologne
Alexandra Duron
Engagement Manager, Montreal
Richard Kelly
Partner, Stamford
Simeon Mußler
Specialist, Hamburg
Raphael Rettig
Junior Specialist, Düsseldorf
Sebastian Stoffregen
Associate Partner, Munich
Production team
Frank Breuer
Media Designer, Berlin
Jörg Hanebrink
Senior Communications Specialist, Düsseldorf
Martin Hattrup-Silberberg
Senior Communications Specialist, Düsseldorf
Christian Johnson
Senior Editor, Hong Kong