BPS On One's Own Land With Another's Materials: (Art. 447) L.O. and B.P.S. Are The Same
BPS On One's Own Land With Another's Materials: (Art. 447) L.O. and B.P.S. Are The Same
447)
L.O. and B.P.S. are the same
GF GF
BF GF
LO B,P,S OM
Compel the BPS to Remove the Must pay for the value of the land if
Buildings, Plantings in case he he accepts the offer of the LO to sell
chooses no. 2 and BPS fails to pay the land; If BP fails to pay the agreed
for the land. price, he will lose his right of
retention and LO shall be entitled to
Now, If value of land is removal of improvement. (Art. 450)
considerably more than the value
of the building or tree. (Code is
silent) Three choices is suggested by
Atty. Rabuya which is based on
jurisprudence: to wit:
3. Compel the BP to pay the price of Pay for the value of the land whether
the land S to pay rent whether or or not the it is more than the value of
not it is considerably more than the building or trees; the sower must
the value of the accessory (Art. pay for the proper rent (Art. 450)
450) + Damages (Art. 451)
Apply rules if both are in good 1. apply rules if both are in good
faith faith
LO BPS OM
GF GF GF
1. Appropriate the work/sowing Right of reimbursement for
planting after payment of Necessary and Useful expenses a. Entitled to reimbursement from
Necessary Expenses, Useful with Right of retention until the BPS, principally; or
expenses with right of retention Necessary, useful and in some b. Can go after the LO if the BPS is
until fully paid, Ornamental instances Ornamental expenses are insolvent and LO uses the
expenses shall not be paid, paid. (Art. 448 in relation to 546) materials
unless LO chooses to appropriate
the thing made for pure luxury May Remove materials (ornaments
and LO pays its value. or only) only if without injury to the
principal. (Art. 447)
2. Oblige the builder and planter to
pay the price of the land and the In addition he is obliged to pay
sower to pay rent, in case the proper rent in case the LO chooses
value of improvement is not to appropriate whatever is built,
considerably more than the planted or sown on his land. (The
value of the land. (Here B/P terms of lease shall be agreed upon
must pay otherwise LO may by the parties, in case of
compel him to remove the disagreement, the court shall fix the
improvement.) (Right of terms.)
remotion) Masmura kase
improvement kesa sa lupa) (Art. Must pay for the value of the land if
448) he accepts the offer of the LO to sell
the land; If BP fails to pay the agreed
Compel the BPS to Remove the price, he will lose his right of
Buildings, Plantings in case he retention and LO shall be entitled to
chooses no. 2 and BPS fails to pay removal of improvement. (Art. 450)
for the land.
Additional Rights and Obligation of
Now, If value of land is the BPS:(Art. 455)
considerably more than the value 1. Principally liable to the OM;
of the building or tree. (Code is since he was the first to use the
silent) Three choices is suggested by materials;
Atty. Rabuya which is based on 2. If BPS is insolvent, LO shall be
jurisprudence: to wit: subsidiarily liable, provided the
latter chose to use the materials;
Leave the thing as is 3. If the BPS pays the OM, BPS may
Right of remotion demand from landowner the
Sale of the land in public auction value of the materials and labor
(provided LO did not appropriate
Additional Rights and Obligation the materials because he did not
of the LO: (art. 455) profit from the accession)
1. Subsidiarily liable for the value
of the materials to OM in the
event that the BPS is insolvent.
2. The landowner can only make
use of the materials if he
appropriates the construction;
(LO subsidiarily liable)
3. If he compels the BPS to
purchase the land; or to demolish
the construction, the landowner
does not make use of the
materials, thus he cannot be
made subsidiarily liable to the
OM for the value thereof;
4. If the BPS pays the OM, BPS may
demand from landowner the value
of the materials and labor
(provided LO did not appropriate
the materials because he did not
profit from the accession)
GF GF BF
1. Appropriate the work/sowing Right of reimbursement for Loose all the rights to be indemnified
planting after payment of Necessary and Useful expenses
Necessary Expenses, Useful with Right of retention until Damages
expenses with right of retention Necessary, useful and in some
until fully paid, Ornamental instances Ornamental expenses are
expenses shall not be paid, paid. (Art. 448 in relation to 546)
unless LO chooses to appropriate
the thing made for pure luxury May Remove materials (ornaments
and LO pays its value. or only) only if without injury to the
2. Oblige the builder and planter to principal. (Art. 447)
pay the price of the land and the
sower to pay rent, in case the In addition he is obliged to pay
value of improvement is not proper rent in case the LO chooses
considerably more than the to appropriate whatever is built,
value of the land. (Here B/P planted or sown on his land. (The
must pay otherwise LO may terms of lease shall be agreed upon
compel him to remove the by the parties, in case of
improvement.) (Right of disagreement, the court shall fix the
remotion) Masmura kase terms.)
improvement kesa sa lupa) (Art.
448) Must pay for the value of the land if
he accepts the offer of the LO to sell
3. Compel the BPS to Remove the the land; If BP fails to pay the agreed
Buildings, Plantings in case he price, he will lose his right of
chooses no. 2 and BPS fails to retention and LO shall be entitled to
pay for the land. removal of improvement. (Art. 450)
GF BF BF
If the payment is made by the BPS he now becomes the owner of the materials. Thus, the case would now be the
same as that of BPS with one’s own materials on the land of another (Apply the foregoing chart)
Right of Appropriation of whatever Absolute right of removal of the Receive indemnity of the materials
is planted, built or sown Except: improvements whether or not from the BPS principally then from
When the BPS decides to remove the substantial injury is caused; plus the LO subsidiarily
improvements whether or not damages; (ownership of
destruction would be caused. In this improvements still retains to him)
case, the improvements would still
belong to the BPS who in addition Right to reimbursement of the
will still be entitled to damages value of the building or trees or
plants plus damages, in case he
chooses not to remove the materials
BF GF BF