0% found this document useful (0 votes)
433 views2 pages

Organization: Category Scoring Criteria VGE (5) GE (4) SE (3) LE (2) N

This document outlines scoring criteria for evaluating presentations across three categories: organization, content, and presentation. For organization, it evaluates whether ideas were logically arranged and an appropriate organizational pattern was observed. For content, it evaluates whether the purpose was well-defined and arguments were supported by valid sources. For presentation, it evaluates voice, pronunciation, gestures, attire, eye contact and mastery of the presentation material.

Uploaded by

Adeline Pascual
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
433 views2 pages

Organization: Category Scoring Criteria VGE (5) GE (4) SE (3) LE (2) N

This document outlines scoring criteria for evaluating presentations across three categories: organization, content, and presentation. For organization, it evaluates whether ideas were logically arranged and an appropriate organizational pattern was observed. For content, it evaluates whether the purpose was well-defined and arguments were supported by valid sources. For presentation, it evaluates voice, pronunciation, gestures, attire, eye contact and mastery of the presentation material.

Uploaded by

Adeline Pascual
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Category Scoring Criteria VGE GE SE LE N

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)


Ideas were arranged logically.
ORGANIZATION
Appropriate organizational pattern was observed.
Transitions were smooth.
Content was relevant.
CONTENT
Purpose was well defined.
Arguments were sound and supported with valid and credible sources.

Introduction captured listener’s attention.


Presentation was ended effectively with a review of the main points.

Voice was audible and pleasant.


PRESENTATION
Proper pronunciation, enunciation, and articulation were observed.

Gestures, postures, and facial expressions were expressive, dynamic, and natural.

Attire was appropriate.


The student demonstrated mastery of the presentation.
Eye contact with the audience was established and maintained.

Category Scoring Criteria VGE GE SE LE N


(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Ideas were arranged logically.
ORGANIZATION
Appropriate organizational pattern was observed.
Transitions were smooth.
Content was relevant.
CONTENT
Purpose was well defined.

Arguments were sound and supported with valid and credible sources.
Introduction captured listener’s attention.
Presentation was ended effectively with a review of the main points.
Voice was audible and pleasant.
PRESENTATION
Proper pronunciation, enunciation, and articulation were observed.
Gestures, postures, and facial expressions were expressive, dynamic, and natural.

Attire was appropriate.


The student demonstrated mastery of the presentation.
Eye contact with the audience was established and maintained.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy