0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views36 pages

Eliciting Expert Judgment: ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani

Uploaded by

Joli Smith
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views36 pages

Eliciting Expert Judgment: ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani

Uploaded by

Joli Smith
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 36

Lecture 5

Eliciting Expert Judgment

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani

Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved


Outline
▪ Role of experts in project risk management
▪ Expert opinions from the class
▪ Best practices
▪ Estimating parameters
▪ Assessing subjective probabilities
▪ Heuristics and bias
▪ Obtaining risk and time preferences
▪ Combining opinions from various experts
▪ Assessment protocol

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
2
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Obtaining Risk and Time Preferences

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
3
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Time Value of Money
▪ Most projects take place over a significant time period

▪ The distribution of costs (or revenues) over time may have a


significant impact on the project’s value

▪ Some trade-off decisions may imply moving cash flows in time

▪ Discounting is the correct way to compare amounts of money that


do not occur at the same date
ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
4
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Discounting
▪Discounting allows comparison of non risky amounts received at
different time and of different streams of amounts
▪ Present value for a given rate is the amount which is equivalent to
the stream of cash flows generated by the project
▪ Internal rate of return is a rate such that the NPV of a stream of cash
flows is 0

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
5
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
What is the right discount rate?
▪The time value of money depends on many factors
▪ Impatience
▪ Alternative opportunities
▪ Funding costs
▪ Inflation
▪It depends on the organization and should be set by the
stakeholders of the project
▪It should not include risk considerations
ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
6
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Assessing the Discount Rate
▪ How much additional funds ($𝑀) are the stakeholders of the
project willing to invest now in order to accelerate the project?
▪ Time considerations – by 𝑥 months
▪ Value considerations – which will allow them to reap $𝐵 benefits earlier
▪ Cost considerations – by borrowing (or not investing) money at rate 𝑖

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
7
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Comparing Amounts at Different Dates

0 𝑇−𝑑 𝑇

𝑇−𝑑
𝐵−𝑀 1+𝑖
0 𝑇−𝑑 𝑇

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
8
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Risk Perception / Attitude

10 000 $
0.5

0.5
50 000 $

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
9
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Risk Perception / Attitude

10 000 $
0.5

0.5
-10 000 $

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
10
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Risk Perception / Attitude

10 000 $
0.99

0.01
-10 000 $

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
11
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Risk Perception / Attitude

10 000 Columbian Pesos


0.5

0.5
-10 000 Columbian Pesos

1Columbian Peso = 0.44


Lebanese pound
ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
12
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Risk Perception / Attitude

10 000 $
0.5

For Jeff Bezos

0.5
-10 000 $

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
13
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Risk Attitudes
100
0.5
~ 25
0.5 0
100 Risk averse
0.5
~ 50
0.5 0
Risk neutral 100
0.5
~ 75
0.5 0
Risk seeker
ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
14
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Risk Preferences
▪The « risk premium » is the amount one is willing to pay to
reduce risk
▪It depends on the risk attitude and on the perception of the
risk
▪It is difficult to elicit
▪Examples: insurance, price of reputation, price of flexibility

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
15
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Amount at Risk
500
450
400 risk
350 premium
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000

expected value certainty equivalent

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
Project Risk Management - Eliciting expert judgme
16
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Uncertainty
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20 risk premium
10
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

expected value certainty equivalent

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
Project Risk Management - Eliciting expert judgme
17
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Consistent Risk Attitude

▪Finding the certainty equivalent for each uncertain


event is difficult and time consuming

▪Consistency problem

▪Decentralization problem

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
18
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Utility Theory
▪ Utility theory is based on behavioral axioms that are generally
acceptable
▪ Acceptation of these axioms leads to the existence of a utility
function that can be used for any uncertain venture
▪ Utility functions can treat any variables and multiple attributes
▪ Utility is a scale measuring preferences for outcomes.
Conventionally, it takes values from 0 to 1

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
19
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
A concave utility function
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6

utility
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

amount

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
Project Risk Management - Eliciting expert judgme
20
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Building a Utility Function

-$2,000

0.5

0.5
+$10,000

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
21
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
The Exponential Utility Function
▪ Within a reasonable range of values, many utility curves can be fit by an
exponential function

−𝑥
𝑢 𝑥 =𝑎− 𝑏𝑒 𝑅

▪ R is the risk tolerance (in the units of x)

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
22
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Cognitive Biases
▪ Endowment effect: the value of a good is larger when you own it
than when you don’t

▪ Preference reversals

▪ emotions

▪ Small probabilities (rare events)

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
23
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Combining Opinions from Various
Experts

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
24
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Why use multiple Experts
▪Because assessment is important
▪Because one may need various perspectives
▪Because knowledge is distributed
▪Questions:
▪ How many?
▪ Which ones?
▪ How should you aggregate judgments?

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
25
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Three Approaches

▪Aggregate the judgments (e.g. distributions)

▪Aggregate the experts

▪A combination (e.g. Delphi)

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
26
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Aggregation of Judgments
▪ Easily performed using specialized software (e.g. @RISK)

▪ Weights can be given to experts according to their credibility

▪ For instance, a distribution is produced as a weighted average of


cumulated percentiles.

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
27
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Aggregation of Experts
▪ Facilitates discussion and confrontation of opinions
▪ Workshop configuration, managed by a facilitator
▪ Experts are asked to provide a consensus judgment or a consensus
distribution
▪ May require considerable time, clarification, information sharing
and compromise
▪ May lead to biases in the consensus opinion (bandwagon effect,
halo effect)
ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
28
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Delphi Method
▪ Panel of anonymous experts
▪ Experts answer questionnaires and comment the answers of
others
▪ Opinions can be revised – multiple feedback rounds
▪ A facilitator manages the flow of information
▪ Usually continues until consensus is reached
ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
29
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Expert Risk Assessment Protocol

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
30
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Motivation
▪ Expert risk assessment plays a major role in project risk
management

▪ The process by which expert knowledge is obtained must be


documented and must stand up to professional scrutiny

▪ In general, this means the development of a protocol satisfying a


number of steps and properties.
ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
31
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Steps of an Assessment Protocol
1. Background (evidence dossier)
▪ Identify elements for which expert assessment is needed
▪ Research determining the extent of scientific knowledge and/or
available data
▪ Examine objectives of stakeholders to ensure gathering relevant
information

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
32
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Steps of an Assessment Protocol
2. Identification and recruitment
▪ External or in-house
▪ Relevant expertise (meaning?), diverse perspectives
3. Motivation of experts
▪ Explain the context
▪ Stress the importance of expert knowledge
▪ Explain how information will be used

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
33
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Steps of an Assessment Protocol
4. Elicit experts’ knowledge model
▪ Relationships, chains of reasoning

5. Training
▪ in expressing beliefs and opinions in the form of quantities
(probabilities, values, rates, risk aversion)
▪ in providing honest and un-biased information

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
34
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Steps of an Assessment Protocol
6. Elicitation and verification
▪ Check for consistency
▪ Obtain confirmation
▪ Document information and rationale
7. Aggregation
▪ Encourage discussion and confrontation of opinions
▪ Control interactions to avoid biases
▪ Obtain consensus / weights.
ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
35
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved
Readings
▪ Brown, G. E. (2019). Eliciting Expert Opinion in Acquisition Cost and
Schedule Estimating.
▪ Szwed, P. (2016, April). Expert Judgment in Project Management: Narrowing
the Theory-Practice Gap. Project Management Institute.
▪ Hora, S. C. (2007). Eliciting probabilities from experts. Advances in decision
analysis: From foundations to applications, 129.

ENMG 698c: Special Topics - Project Risk Management - Dr. Rayan Khraibani
36
Copyright © 2020-2021, American University of Beirut, All Rights Reserved

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy