FN Clarivate Analytics Web of Science

VR 1.0
PT J
AU Lu, FF
Kwan, HK
Ma, B
AF Lu, Feifei
Kwan, Ho Kwong
Ma, Bin
TI Carry the past into the future: the effects of CEO temporal focus on
succession planning in family firms
SO ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Temporal focus; Succession planning; Environmental uncertainty; Family
interaction; Family firm
ID LONG-TERM ORIENTATION; TIME PERSPECTIVE; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; BUSINESS
SUCCESSION; GENERATIONAL CHANGE; STRATEGIC CHANGE; MODERATING ROLE;
UPPER ECHELONS; PERFORMANCE; ENTREPRENEURSHIP
AB In this study, the relationship between CEO temporal focus and family business
succession planning is examined and the moderating effects of family interactions
and environmental uncertainty are assessed. Based on data from 198 CEOs of family
businesses and additional data from 15 semi-structured interviews in China, we find
that CEO temporal focus (i.e., past, present, or future focus) is positively
associated with succession planning. In addition, family interactions strengthen
the relationship between CEO past focus and succession planning and weaken the
relationship between CEO future focus and succession planning. Moreover, in
uncertain environments, past-focused CEOs are more likely to plan for succession
than present-focused CEOs. The theoretical contributions and practical implications
of the study are also discussed.
C1 [Lu, Feifei] Shanghai Univ, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China.
[Lu, Feifei] Univ Technol Sydney, Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
[Kwan, Ho Kwong] China Europe Int Business Sch CEIBS, Shanghai 201206, Peoples R
China.
[Ma, Bin] IE Univ, IE Business Sch, Madrid, Spain.
RP Lu, FF (corresponding author), Shanghai Univ, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China.;
Lu, FF (corresponding author), Univ Technol Sydney, Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007,
Australia.
EM lvfeifei87@hotmail.com; weicheong2317@hotmail.com; bin.ma@ie.edu
FU National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Natural Science
Foundation of China (NSFC) [711702195]
FX National Natural Science Foundation of China (711702195).
CR Aldrich HE, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P573, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
ALLEN MP, 1982, ADMIN SCI QUART, V27, P538, DOI 10.2307/2392529
ALTMAN DG, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P485, DOI 10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485
Ancona DG, 2001, ACAD MANAGE REV, V26, P645, DOI 10.2307/3560246
Back P, 2020, EUR MANAG J, V38, P884, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.009
Banalieva ER, 2015, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V36, P1358, DOI 10.1002/smj.2288
Bandura A, 2001, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V52, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Barkema HG, 1998, ACAD MANAGE J, V41, P7, DOI 10.2307/256894
Basco R, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P82, DOI 10.1177/0894486508327824
BAZZOLI GJ, 1985, J HUM RESOUR, V20, P214, DOI 10.2307/146009
BECKER GS, 1981, ECONOMICA, V48, P1, DOI 10.2307/2552939
Bennedsen M, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P647, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
Berrone P, 2010, ADMIN SCI QUART, V55, P82, DOI 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.82
Bertrand M, 2006, J ECON PERSPECT, V20, P73, DOI 10.1257/jep.20.2.73
Bigliardi B, 2009, MEAS BUS EXCELL, V13, P44, DOI 10.1108/13683040910961207
Bingham CB, 2011, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V32, P1437, DOI 10.1002/smj.965
Bluedorn A. C., 2002, HUMAN ORG TIME TEMPO
 Bracci E., 2011, IUP J KNOWLEDGE MANA, V9, P7
Brislin RW, 1986, RES INSTRUM, V8, P137
Cabrera-Suarez K., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P37, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2001.00037.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00037.X]
Cadieux L., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P17, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00017.X
Chen ZG, 2012, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V29, P597, DOI 10.1007/s10490-010-9210-z
Chittoor R, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00084.x
Cho TS, 2006, ORGAN SCI, V17, P453, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1060.0192
Chrisman JJ, 2012, ACAD MANAGE J, V55, P976, DOI 10.5465/amj.2011.0211
Christensen CR, 1953, MANAGEMENT SUCCESSIO
Chua J.H., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P89, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00089.X
Chung CN, 2013, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V34, P338, DOI 10.1002/smj.2011
Claessens BJC, 2004, J ORGAN BEHAV, V25, P937, DOI 10.1002/job.292
CLARK LF, 1993, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V19, P399, DOI 10.1177/0146167293194005
Colli A, 2013, BUS HIST, V55, P841, DOI [10.1080/00076791.2012.744589,
10.1080/00076791.2012.687536]
Colli A, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P243, DOI 10.1177/0894486511426872
Connelly BL, 2016, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V37, P2135, DOI 10.1002/smj.2430
Cucculelli M, 2008, J CORP FINANC, V14, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.11.001
Dacin M. T., 2008, SAGE HDB ORG I, P327, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781849200387.N13
Daily C. M., 1993, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V31, P79
DALTON DR, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P749, DOI 10.2307/256235
DAS TK, 1987, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V8, P203, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250080211
Das TK, 2004, MANAGING FUTURE FORE, P58
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
Datta DK, 2003, BRIT J MANAGE, V14, P101, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.00268
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
De Rosenblatt PC, 1985, FAMILY BUSINESS UNDE
Deephouse DL, 2013, J MANAGE STUD, V50, P337, DOI 10.1111/joms.12015
DesJardine M. R., 2020, ACAD MANAGE J, DOI [10.5465/amj.2018.1470, DOI
10.5465/AMJ.2018.1470]
DEVRIES MFRK, 1993, ORGAN DYN, V21, P59
Dyck B, 2002, J BUS VENTURING, V17, P143, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00056-2
Eddleston KA, 2008, J BUS VENTURING, V23, P244, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.11.002
Eggers JP, 2009, ORGAN SCI, V20, P461, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1080.0401
EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE J, V32, P543, DOI 10.2307/256434
EISENHARDT KM, 1995, ADMIN SCI QUART, V40, P84, DOI 10.2307/2393701
Erdogan I, 2020, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V44, P20, DOI 10.1177/1042258719839712
Ferrer RL, 2013, ANN FAM MED, V11, P303, DOI 10.1370/afm.1551
Filser M, 2013, MANAG RES REV, V36, P256, DOI 10.1108/01409171311306409
Finkelstein S, 2009, STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP
FORNELL C, 1981, J MARKETING RES, V18, P39, DOI 10.2307/3151312
Fried Y, 2004, ACAD MANAGE REV, V29, P404
Gamache DL, 2019, ACAD MANAGE J, V62, P918, DOI 10.5465/amj.2017.0526
Gamache DL, 2015, ACAD MANAGE J, V58, P1261, DOI 10.5465/amj.2013.0377
Gilding M, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P299, DOI 10.1111/etap.12040
Glaser BG., 2017, DISCOVERY GROUNDED T
Glaser BG., 1978, ADV METHODOLOGY GROU
Glauben T, 2009, APPL ECON, V41, P45, DOI 10.1080/00036840601131722
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2003, ACAD MANAGE J, V46, P226, DOI 10.2307/30040616
Grant RM, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V17, P109, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250171110
GUTHRIE JP, 1991, PERS PSYCHOL, V44, P263
HAMBRICK DC, 1984, ACAD MANAGE REV, V9, P193, DOI 10.2307/258434
Hambrick DC, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P334, DOI 10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
HANDLER W. C., 1994, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V7, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00133.X
 Handler W.C., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P361, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1988.00361.X
Harris D., 1994, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V7, P159, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00159.X
Harveston P.D., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P373
Hatak IR, 2015, FAM BUS REV, V28, P10, DOI 10.1177/0894486513480386
Highhouse S, 2009, STATISTICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL MYTHS AND URBAN LEGENDS:
DOCTRINE, VERITY AND FABLE IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, P247
Ingram P, 2000, ADMIN SCI QUART, V45, P25, DOI 10.2307/2666978
Ip B, 2006, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V13, P326, DOI 10.1108/14626000610680235
James AE, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P87, DOI 10.1177/0894486511414271
Jennings J, 2014, SAGE HDB FAMILY BUSI, P25, DOI [10.4135/9781446247556.n2, DOI
10.4135/9781446247556.N2]
Jennings JE, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P747
JURKOVICH R, 1974, ADMIN SCI QUART, V19, P380, DOI 10.2307/2391979
Kauffman DF, 2004, EDUC PSYCHOL REV, V16, P1, DOI
10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012342.37854.58
Kellermanns FW, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2004.00040.x
Koiranen M., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P175, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2002.00175.x
Kooij DTAM, 2018, J APPL PSYCHOL, V103, P867, DOI 10.1037/apl0000306
Lam J, 2003, ED TRAINING, V45, P474
Lane PJ, 1998, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V19, P461, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L
LANSBERG I, 1983, ORGAN DYN, V12, P39, DOI 10.1016/0090-2616(83)90025-6
Lansberg I., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P119, DOI [10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00011-9, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x]
Lansberg I., 1994, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V7, P39, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1994.00039.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1994.00039.X]
Law KS, 2016, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V33, P319, DOI 10.1007/s10490-015-9453-9
Le Breton-Miller I, 2006, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V30, P731, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2006.00147.x
Lee KS, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P657
Leonard D., 2005, HARVARD BUS REV, V30, P157
Lewin K, 1942, CIVILIAN MORALE, P48, DOI DOI 10.1037/13983-004
Liberman N, 2002, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V38, P523, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-
8
Lumpkin GT, 2010, ENTREP REGION DEV, V22, P241, DOI 10.1080/08985621003726218
Lumpkin GT, 2011, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V35, P1149, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2011.00495.x
MacCallum RC, 2002, PSYCHOL METHODS, V7, P19, DOI 10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.19
Marshall JP, 2006, J BUS VENTURING, V21, P348, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.004
Mayring P., 2014, QUALITATIVE CONTENT
McGraw KO, 1996, PSYCHOL METHODS, V1, P30, DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.390
Meier O, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P256, DOI 10.1177/0894486516646260
Melin L, 2014, SAGE HDB FAMILY BUSI, DOI [10.4135/9781446247556, DOI
10.4135/9781446247556]
Michael-Tsabari N, 2015, FAM BUS REV, V28, P26, DOI 10.1177/0894486513497506
Miles M. B., 1994, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA
MILLER D, 1991, MANAGE SCI, V37, P34, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.37.1.34
Miller D, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P513, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
Miller D, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P445, DOI 10.1111/etap.12231
Miller D, 2013, ORGAN SCI, V24, P189, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0728
MILLIKEN FJ, 1987, ACAD MANAGE REV, V12, P133, DOI 10.2307/257999
Motwani J, 2006, INT SMALL BUS J, V24, P471, DOI 10.1177/0266242606067270
Nadkarni S, 2016, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V37, P1132, DOI 10.1002/smj.2376
Nadkarni S, 2014, ACAD MANAGE J, V57, P1810, DOI 10.5465/amj.2011.0401
 Neter J., 1985, APPL LINEAR STAT MOD
Nonaka I, 2007, IND CORP CHANGE, V16, P371, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtm014
NUTTIN JM, 1985, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V15, P353, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.2420150309
Pfeffer J., 1978, EXTERNAL CONTROL ORG
Poza E. J., 2007, FAMILY BUSINESS
Rasbash J, 2011, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V100, P474, DOI 10.1037/a0020931
Reinecke J, 2015, ACAD MANAGE J, V58, P618, DOI 10.5465/amj.2012.1004
Royer S, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00108.x
Rubenson G.C., 1996, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V21, P21, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879602100202
Saldana J., 2012, CODING MANUAL QUALIT
Sambrook S, 2005, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V12, P579, DOI 10.1108/14626000510628243
Sanna LJ, 2003, VIRTUE VICE PERSONAL, P105, DOI 10.1037/10614-007
Santora J. C., 2011, BUSINESS REV CAMBRID, V18, P16
Schulze WS, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P447, DOI 10.1111/etap.12159
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P, 2000, CAN J ADM SCI, V17, P233
Sharma P, 2012, REV ANNOTATED BIBLIO
Sharma P., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00001.X
Sharma P., 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V25, P17, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870102500302
Shipp AJ, 2009, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V110, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001
SHROUT PE, 1979, PSYCHOL BULL, V86, P420, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
Sirmon DS, 2003, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V27, P339, DOI DOI 10.1111/1540-8520.T01-
1-00013
Smith B., 1999, J CORP FINANC, V5, P341, DOI [10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00010-3, DOI
10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00010-3]
Smith E, 2009, TRANSNATL LIT, V2
Sobol-Kwapinska M, 2016, J HAPPINESS STUD, V17, P1511, DOI 10.1007/s10902-015-
9656-2
Stieg P, 2017, EUR J INT MANAG, V11, P581, DOI 10.1504/EJIM.2017.10007624
Strauss A., 1990, BASICS QUALITATIVE R
Summers JA, 2005, J INTELL DISABIL RES, V49, P777, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-
2788.2005.00751.x
Van den Berghe LAA, 2003, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V11, P171, DOI 10.1111/1467-
8683.00316
WALLACE M, 1956, J ABNORM SOC PSYCH, V52, P240, DOI 10.1037/h0039899
Wang HL, 2017, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V38, P1875, DOI 10.1002/smj.2604
Ward J. L., 1987, KEEPING FAMILY BUSIN
Weber K, 2011, ORGAN SCI, V22, P287, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1100.0632
Wee Y.G., 2012, INT J ARTS COMMERCE, V1, P262
Wilson AE, 2003, MEMORY, V11, P137, DOI 10.1080/741938210
Woodfield P, 2017, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V8, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.01.001
Yadav MS, 2007, J MARKETING, V71, P84, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.71.4.84
YIN RK, 1994, EVAL PRACT, V15, P283, DOI 10.1016/0886-1633(94)90023-X
Zahra S.A., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P331
ZEDECK S, 1971, PSYCHOL BULL, V76, P295, DOI 10.1037/h0031543
Zellweger TM, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P851, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
Zhang Y, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P483, DOI 10.2307/20159598
Zhong JA, 2011, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V28, P609, DOI 10.1007/s10490-009-9163-2
Zimbardo P., 2008, TIME PARADOX NEW PSY
Zimbardo PG, 1997, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V23, P1007, DOI 10.1016/S0191-
8869(97)00113-X
Zimbardo PG, 1999, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V77, P1271, DOI 10.1037/0022-
3514.77.6.1271
NR 159
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0217-4561
EI 1572-9958
J9 ASIA PAC J MANAG
JI Asia Pac. J. Manag.
DI 10.1007/s10490-020-09748-4
EA JAN 2021
PG 42
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA PP0MC
UT WOS:000605563400002
OA Other Gold
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Rodriguez-Lizano, V
Montero-Vega, M
Sibelet, N
AF Rodriguez-Lizano, Victor
Montero-Vega, Mercedes
Sibelet, Nicole
TI Which variables influence the succession process in family farms? A
literature review
SO CAHIERS AGRICULTURES
LA English
DT Review
DE review; farm transfer; farm succession; family farms; generational
turnover
ID GENDER; CONTINUITY; DECISIONS; POLICY; POWER; LIFE
AB The decrease in family farm succession is a problem in many countries worldwide.
However, no systematic compilation of relevant studies exists. The method of
analysis described in this article enabled us to obtain descriptive statistical
results such as: most-studied variables, least-studied variables, patterns in the
effects of the variables on succession, new types of variables analyzed, and
principal approaches of the qualitative studies. We conducted a literature search
in four databases, which resulted in 59papers relevant to the topic. Twenty-nine of
them are quantitative and 30 are qualitative. The literature search in peer-
reviewed journals in English resulted primarily in articles from developed
countries. Due to this, the selection, analysis and results turned out to be
focused on Global North countries. Likewise, the studies considered are focused
mainly on the opinion of the principal farmer and disregard that of other family
members. From the quantitative studies, we analyzed five groups of variables
(farmer, farm, family, context and psychological variables). The farmer variables
are the most studied and the context and psychological variables are the least
studied. We identified four axes around which the qualitative studies focused:
socioeconomic factors, communication between father and heir about the process of
succession, integration in decision-making and trust in the heir, and training the
successor. Adding new countries (e.g. from Sub-Saharan Africa) and generating new
models including psychological, context, and qualitative variables could lead to
new ways of understanding such a complex issue.
C1 [Rodriguez-Lizano, Victor; Montero-Vega, Mercedes] Univ Costa Rica, Dept Agr
Econ, San Jose 115012060, Costa Rica.
 [Sibelet, Nicole] CIRAD, UMR INNOVATION, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
[Sibelet, Nicole] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier SupAgro, INRA, INNOVATION,CIRAD,
Montpellier, France.
RP Rodriguez-Lizano, V (corresponding author), Univ Costa Rica, Dept Agr Econ, San
Jose 115012060, Costa Rica.
EM victorantonio.rodriguez@ucr.ac.cr
OI Sibelet, Nicole/0000-0002-2107-6376
FU University of Costa Rica
FX We want to thank the University of Costa Rica for funding this project
that was conducted during the doctoral studies of the main author.
CR AJZEN I, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V50, P179, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[Anonymous], 2016, IEEE-ASME T MECH, VPP, P1, DOI DOI
10.1109/IEEESTD.2016.7460875
Arowolo OO, 2017, J AGRIC EXT, V21, P80, DOI 10.4314/jae.v21i1.7
Berdegue J, 2011, IFAD C NEW DIR SMALL
Brandth B, 2019, AGR HUM VALUES, V36, P49, DOI 10.1007/s10460-018-9887-z
Brandth B, 2013, SOCIOL RURALIS, V53, P95, DOI 10.1111/soru.12003
Carolan M, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V79, P179, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.011
Cassidy A, 2019, CAN J DEV STUD, V40, P238, DOI 10.1080/02255189.2018.1517643
Cassidy A, 2014, SOCIOL RURALIS, V54, P399, DOI 10.1111/soru.12054
Cavicchioli D., 2019, Agricultural and Food Economics, V7, DOI 10.1186/s40100-
019-0129-5
Cavicchioli D, 2018, J RURAL STUD, V61, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.06.002
Cavicchioli D, 2015, MT RES DEV, V35, P152, DOI 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00107.1
Chiswell HM, 2018, RURAL SOCIOL, V83, P630, DOI 10.1111/ruso.12205
Conway SF, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V54, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.007
Corsi A., 2009, Rivista di Economia Agraria, V64, P13
Creighton J, 2016, SMALL-SCALE FOR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11842-015-9301-2
Downey H, 2016, J AGING STUD, V38, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jaging.2016.04.007
Errington A. J., 1998, Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, V5,
P123, DOI 10.1080/13892249885300241
Eurostat, 2016, FARM STRUCTURE SURVE
Fink A., 2010, CONDUCTING RES LIT R
Firman A, 2018, LIVESTOCK RES RURAL, V10, P176
Fischer H, 2014, SOCIOL RURALIS, V54, P417, DOI 10.1111/soru.12055
Glauben T, 2009, APPL ECON, V41, P45, DOI 10.1080/00036840601131722
Glover JL, 2014, INT J GEND ENTREP, V6, P276, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-01-2012-0006
Graeub BE, 2016, WORLD DEV, V87, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.012
Grubbstrom A, 2012, J HIST GEOGR, V38, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.jhg.2012.03.001
Hennessy TC, 2007, J AGR ECON, V58, P61, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00078.x
HLPE, 2013, INVESTING SMALLHOLDE
Ingram J, 2011, LAND USE POLICY, V28, P917, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.04.001
Inwood SM, 2012, J RURAL STUD, V28, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.07.005
Joosse S, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V50, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.018
Kazakopoulos L, 2003, J RURAL STUD, V19, P397, DOI 10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00022-6
Kerbler B, 2012, AGR ECON-CZECH, V58, P285, DOI 10.17221/47/2011-AGRICECON
Kerbler-Kefo B, 2008, ACTA GEOGR SLOV, V48, P277, DOI 10.3986/AGS48203
Kimhi A, 2001, J AGR ECON, V52, P42, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2001.tb00924.x
Leonard Susan Hautaniemi, 2006, Great Plains Research, V16, P181
Lequieu AM, 2015, RURAL SOCIOL, V80, P39, DOI 10.1111/ruso.12046
Lobley M, 2010, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V1, P49, DOI 10.5304/jafscd.2010.011.009
Lowder SK, 2016, WORLD DEV, V87, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041
Mann S, 2007, AGR HUM VALUES, V24, P435, DOI 10.1007/s10460-007-9087-8
Mann S, 2007, SOCIOL RURALIS, V47, P369, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00442.x
May D, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V82, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.019
Mishra AK, 2007, J AM SOC FARM MANAG, P1, DOI 10.22004/ag.econ.190674
Mishra AK, 2008, REV ECON HOUSEHOLD, V6, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11150-008-9032-7
Mishra AK, 2010, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V35, P133
 Morais M, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V71, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.002
Morais M, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V68, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.024
Nuthall PL, 2017, J AGRIC EDUC EXT, V23, P39, DOI 10.1080/1389224X.2016.1200992
O'Callaghan Z, 2017, AGEING SOC, V37, P441, DOI 10.1017/S0144686X1500118X
Otomo Y., 2009, JB OSTERREICHISCHEN, V18, P79
Pitts M, 2009, J APPL COMMUN RES, V37, P59, DOI 10.1080/00909880802592631
Rayasawath C, 2018, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/agriculture8070109
Santhanam-Martin M, 2019, CAN J DEV STUD, V40, P254, DOI
10.1080/02255189.2018.1517302
Stiglbauer A., 2000, CAHIERS EC SOCIOLOGI, V54, P5
Suess-Reyes J, 2016, J RURAL STUD, V47, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.008
Tetteh I, 2019, INT FOOD AGRIBUS MAN, V22, P429, DOI 10.22434/IFAMR2018.0002
Tsutsumi M., 2001, INT J JAPANESE SOCIO, V10, P69, DOI 10.1111/1475-6781.00008
Uchiyama T., 2008, Japanese Journal of Rural Economics, V10, P33
Weiss C. R., 2004, REV ECON HOUSEHOLD, V2, P443, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11150-004-
5656-4
Wheeler S, 2012, J RURAL STUD, V28, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.04.001
Whitt Christine James M., 2019, AM DIVERSE FAMILY FA
Zhu Jia-shi, 2007, Journal of Fungal Research, V5, P214
Zou BL, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V77, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.001
NR 63
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU EDP SCIENCES S A
PI LES ULIS CEDEX A
PA 17, AVE DU HOGGAR, PA COURTABOEUF, BP 112, F-91944 LES ULIS CEDEX A,
FRANCE
SN 1166-7699
EI 1777-5949
J9 CAH AGRIC
JI Cah. Agric.
PD DEC 23
PY 2020
VL 29
AR 39
DI 10.1051/cagri/2020040
PG 11
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary; Agronomy
SC Agriculture
GA PM1XN
UT WOS:000603601200001
OA DOAJ Gold, Green Published
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Magrelli, V
Rondi, E
De Massis, A
Kotlar, J
AF Magrelli, Vittoria
Rondi, Emanuela
De Massis, Alfredo
Kotlar, Josip
TI Generational brokerage: An intersubjective perspective on managing
temporal orientations in family firm succession
SO STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE advisors; family business; intergenerational; succession; temporal work
ID BOUNDARY WORK; TIME; BUSINESS; STRATEGY; HISTORY; FUTURE; ORGANIZATIONS;
LEGACY; LEADERSHIP; DIALECTICS
AB Interactions between family members of different generations often unleash
powerful tensions in family firms. Intergenerational tensions can be particularly
prominent during intra-family succession as a result of the different temporal
orientations of senior and junior generation family members. However, scant
systematic attention has thus far been paid to understanding the temporality of
intergenerational tensions in family firms. Through an embedded case study, we
explore the mediation process that helps family firms manage intergenerational
tensions by way of temporal work. Our investigation of an advisory firm and its
clients led us to identify generational brokerage as the intersubjective process
through which temporal work enables generations toward the joint understanding of
temporal orientations. Our theoretical insights have significant implications for
developing a temporal view of succession and add novel important knowledge to
research on mediation and time. Indeed, we show that generational brokerage is a
dialectic construct with organizing properties able to blend disparate research
streams by going beyond a unidirectional forward-flowing logic of time in examining
organizational processes.
C1 [Magrelli, Vittoria; Rondi, Emanuela] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Econ &
Management, Bolzano, Italy.
[De Massis, Alfredo] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Entrepreneurship & Family
Business, Bolzano, Italy.
[De Massis, Alfredo] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Ctr Family Business Management,
Bolzano, Italy.
[De Massis, Alfredo] Univ Lancaster, Management Sch, Ctr Family Business, Family
Business Projects, Lancaster, England.
[Kotlar, Josip] Politecn Milan, Sch Management, Strategy & Family Business,
Milan, Italy.
RP Magrelli, V (corresponding author), Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Piazza Univ 1, I-
39100 Bolzano, Italy.
EM Vittoria.magrelli@unibz.it
RI ; Kotlar, Josip/U-5073-2017
OI Rondi, Emanuela/0000-0003-0511-2055; Kotlar, Josip/0000-0003-1809-8600
CR Abbott A, 1997, SOC FORCES, V75, P1149, DOI 10.2307/2580667
Abbott A., 2001, TIME MATTERS THEORY
Ancona DG, 2001, ACAD MANAGE REV, V26, P645, DOI 10.2307/3560246
Argyres NS, 2020, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V41, P343, DOI 10.1002/smj.3118
Bengtson VL, 2005, THEORY THEORIZING FA
Bertschi-Michel A, 2020, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V44, P81, DOI
10.1177/1042258719834016
Boyd J., 1999, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V12, P299, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1999.00299.X
Caruso EM, 2008, PSYCHOL SCI, V19, P796, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02159.x
Cesaro F, 2011, RACCONTI FABBRICA NA
Cesaro F, 2016, IVE DONE IT YOU GENE
Cesaro F, 2004, PICCOLI SCATENATI FO
Cesaro F, 2004, DIPAV QUADERNI SEMES, V11, P71
Cesaro F, 2000, RICERCHE PSICOLOGIA, V1, P139
Chen JH, 2017, ADMIN SCI QUART, V62, P31, DOI 10.1177/0001839216663504
Chua J.H., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P89, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00089.X
Churchill N. C., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P53, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1997.00053.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1997.00053.X]
Clark T, 1998, J MANAGE STUD, V35, P137, DOI 10.1111/1467-6486.00088
Colli A, 2011, J FAM BUS MANAG, V1, P14, DOI 10.1108/20436231111122254
Corbin J, 2008, BASICS QUALITATIVE R, P85
 Csikszentmihalyi Mihaly, 1997, FLOW PSYCHOL DISCOVE
Cunliffe AL, 2016, J MANAG EDUC, V40, P740, DOI 10.1177/1052562916668919
Cunliffe AL, 2011, ORGAN RES METHODS, V14, P647, DOI 10.1177/1094428110373658
D'Argembeau A, 2004, CONSCIOUS COGN, V13, P844, DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.007
Dalpiaz E, 2018, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V39, P664, DOI 10.1002/smj.2730
Dawson A, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P545, DOI 10.1111/etap.12052
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
De Massis A, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P386, DOI 10.1177/0894486518803422
De Massis A, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P278, DOI 10.1177/0894486516656276
De Massis A, 2016, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V30, P93, DOI 10.5465/amp.2015.0017
De Massis A, 2014, FAM BUS REV, V27, P35, DOI 10.1177/0894486513506114
Deleuze Gilles, 1994, DIFFERENCE REPETITIO
DENNETT DC, 1995, SCIENCES, V35, P34, DOI 10.1002/j.2326-1951.1995.tb03633.x
Dodd SD, 2013, SCAND J MANAG, V29, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.11.006
Dyer G, 2003, CONSULTING FAMILY BU
Eisenhardt KM, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P25, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P532, DOI 10.2307/258557
Emirbayer M, 1998, AM J SOCIOL, V103, P962, DOI 10.1086/231294
Erdogan I, 2020, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V44, P20, DOI 10.1177/1042258719839712
Farjoun M, 2019, STRATEG ORGAN, V17, P133, DOI 10.1177/1476127018803255
Fivush R., 2008, SELF CONTINUITY INDI, P131
Fox M, 2017, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V37, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.003
Gagne M, 2019, FAM BUS REV, DOI 10.1177/0894486519894759
Gagne M, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P292, DOI 10.1177/0894486511410688
Garcia PRJM, 2019, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V43, P224, DOI 10.1177/1042258718796087
Gavetti G, 2007, ORGAN SCI, V18, P420, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1070.0282
GERSICK CJG, 1991, ACAD MANAGE REV, V16, P10, DOI 10.2307/258605
GERSICK CJG, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P9, DOI 10.2307/256768
Gersick K. E., 1997, GENERATION GENERATIO
Gimenez-Jimenez D, 2020, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, DOI [10.1177/1042258720956384, DOI
10.1177/1042258720956384.]
Golden-Biddle K., 2007, COMPOSING QUALITATIV
Grote J., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P113, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00113.X
Hammond NL, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P1209, DOI 10.1111/etap.12241
Hatch MJ, 2017, ADMIN SCI QUART, V62, P657, DOI 10.1177/0001839217692535
Haynes J., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V2, P115
Hernes Tor., 2020, ORG THEORY, V1, P1
Hjorth D, 2007, J BUS VENTURING, V22, P712, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.10.002
Hjorth D, 2016, ORGAN STUD, V37, P1089, DOI 10.1177/0170840615613375
Hodgkinson GP, 2006, LONG RANGE PLANN, V39, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2006.07.003
Huang X, 2020, ADMIN SCI QUART, V65, P710, DOI 10.1177/0001839219870449
Ibrahim A.B., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, VXIV, P245, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2001.00245.X
Jaskiewicz P, 2007, J BUS RES, V60, P1080, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.015
Jaskiewicz P, 2015, J BUS VENTURING, V30, P29, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.001
Joshi A, 2011, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V31, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.002
Joshi A, 2010, ACAD MANAGE REV, V35, P392, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2010.51141800
Kaplan S, 2013, ORGAN SCI, V24, P965, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1120.0792
Kellermanns FW, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2004.00040.x
KERTZER DI, 1983, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V9, P125, DOI
10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.001013
Kotlar J, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P1263, DOI 10.1111/etap.12065
Langley A, 2019, ACAD MANAG ANN, V13, P704, DOI 10.5465/annals.2017.0089
Langley A, 2013, ACAD MANAGE J, V56, P1, DOI 10.5465/amj.2013.4001
Lansberg I., 1999, SUCCEEDING GENERATIO
Le Breton-Miller I, 2018, FIRM BUSINESS FAMILI
 Le Breton-Miller I, 2006, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V30, P731, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2006.00147.x
Le Breton-Miller I, 2011, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V35, P1171, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2011.00496.x
Lefebvre V, 2020, ENTREPRENEURSHIP ED, DOI [10.1177/2515127420921388, DOI
10.1177/2515127420921388.]
Li JB, 2020, ADMIN SCI QUART, V65, P314, DOI 10.1177/0001839219845875
Lippmann S, 2016, ACAD MANAGE REV, V41, P658, DOI 10.5465/amr.2014.0139
Lord RG, 2015, ACAD MANAGE REV, V40, P263, DOI 10.5465/amr.2013.0273
Lumpkin GT, 2010, ENTREP REGION DEV, V22, P241, DOI 10.1080/08985621003726218
Maglio SJ, 2019, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V26, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.05.006
Mannheim K., 1952, ESSAYS SOCIOLOGY KNO, P276, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0168-
8227(00)00198-4
March JG, 1994, EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMIC, P39
Miller D, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P513, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
MILLER D, 1993, ACAD MANAGE J, V36, P644, DOI 10.2307/256597
Miller D., 2005, MANAGING LONG RUN LE
Miron-Spektor E, 2018, ACAD MANAGE J, V61, P26, DOI 10.5465/amj.2016.0594
Nason RS, 2019, ACAD MANAGE REV, V44, P845, DOI 10.5465/amr.2017.0289
Nietzsche FW, 1997, UNTIMELY MEDITATIONS
Nordqvist M, 2012, INT SMALL BUS J, V30, P24, DOI 10.1177/0266242611407413
O'Mahony S, 2008, ADMIN SCI QUART, V53, P422, DOI 10.2189/asqu.53.3.422
Orlikowski WJ, 2002, ORGAN SCI, V13, P684, DOI 10.1287/orsc.13.6.684.501
Putnam LL, 2016, ACAD MANAG ANN, V10, P65, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
Quick KS, 2014, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V24, P673, DOI 10.1093/jopart/mut085
Ravasi D, 2019, ACAD MANAGE J, V62, P1523, DOI 10.5465/amj.2016.0505
Reinecke J, 2017, SAGE HDB PROCESS ORG, P402
Reinecke J, 2015, ACAD MANAGE J, V58, P618, DOI 10.5465/amj.2012.1004
ROVELLI C., 2018, LORDINE DEL TEMPO
Rowlinson M, 2014, ACAD MANAGE REV, V39, P250, DOI 10.5465/amr.2012.0203
RUE L.W., 1996, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V9, P29, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1996.00015.X
Salvato C, 2019, ORGAN STUD, V40, P775, DOI 10.1177/0170840619841402
Salvato C, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P235, DOI 10.1177/0894486513490796
Sasaki I, 2020, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V41, P590, DOI 10.1002/smj.3065
Schad J, 2016, ACAD MANAG ANN, V10, P5, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162422
Schreyogg G, 2011, ORGAN STUD, V32, P321, DOI 10.1177/0170840610397481
Schultz M, 2020, STRATEG ORGAN, V18, P106, DOI 10.1177/1476127019843834
Schultz M, 2013, ORGAN SCI, V24, P1, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0731
Sharma P, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P667, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00015-6
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P, 2014, FAM BUS REV, V27, P10, DOI 10.1177/0894486513516058
SMART J J C, 1949, Mind, V58, P483
Stinchcombe A. L., 1965, HDB ORG, V7, P142
Strike VM, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P80, DOI 10.1177/0894486517735169
Strike VM, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P880, DOI 10.5465/amj.2012.0665
Strike VM, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P156, DOI 10.1177/0894486511431257
Suddaby R, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P633, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083020
Suddaby R, 2020, FAM BUS REV, V33, P234, DOI 10.1177/0894486520942611
Suddaby R, 2010, ADV STRATEG MANAGE, V27, P147, DOI 10.1108/S0742-
3322(2010)0000027009
Vago M., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P71
Van Maanen J, 1979, QUALITATIVE METHODOL
Wade-Benzoni KA, 2008, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V44, P233, DOI
10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.004
Wade-Benzoni KA, 2012, PSYCHOL SCI, V23, P704, DOI 10.1177/0956797612443967
Wade-Benzoni KA, 2009, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V13, P165, DOI
10.1177/1088868309339317
 Walsh IJ, 2011, ACAD MANAGE J, V54, P1017, DOI 10.5465/amj.2008.0658
Ward JL, 2011, KEEPING FAMILY BUSIN
Weick K., 1995, SENSEMAKING ORG
Yin R.K., 2003, CASE STUDY RES
Zellweger TM, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P851, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
ZERUBAVEL E, 1982, AM J SOCIOL, V88, P1, DOI 10.1086/227631
NR 128
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 0
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 1476-1270
EI 1741-315X
J9 STRATEG ORGAN
JI Strateg. Organ.
AR 1476127020976972
DI 10.1177/1476127020976972
EA DEC 2020
PG 36
WC Business; Management
SC Business & Economics
GA PF1DW
UT WOS:000598804200001
OA Green Accepted, Other Gold
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Martinez-Sanchis, P
Aragon-Amonarriz, C
Iturrioz-Landart, C
AF Martinez-Sanchis, Paula
Aragon-Amonarriz, Cristina
Iturrioz-Landart, Cristina
TI How the Pygmalion Effect operates in intra-family succession: Shared
expectations in family SMEs
SO EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Pygmalion effect; Expectations; Family firms; Intra-family succession
ID SELF-EFFICACY; EXPECTANCY; LEADERSHIP; FIRM; BUSINESS; ANTECEDENTS;
PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; DIRECTIONS; COMMITMENT
AB The Pygmalion Effect is a case of the self-fulfilling prophecy, whereby the
expectations of leaders influence the performance of followers (Avolio, Walumbwa, &
Weber, 2009; Rosenthal, 1993). Intra-family succession processes, which are hardly
ever formalised in small- and medium-sized family enterprises, provide a natural
context to explore the perceptions that predecessors have about their successors
and where the Pygmalion Effect is expected to occur. However, little is known about
how a predecessor's expectations can affect intra-family firm succession processes.
Based on qualitative interviews with key family and non-family members,
expectations were analysed in four in-depth case studies of intra-family SME
succession processes. The findings show that the Pygmalion Effect operates over
time and embraces incumbent, successor, and key stakeholders' expectations, which
support the new leader when facing succession-related challenges. (C) 2020 Elsevier
Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Martinez-Sanchis, Paula; Aragon-Amonarriz, Cristina; Iturrioz-Landart,
Cristina] Univ Deusto, Deusto Business Sch DBS, Camino Mundaiz 50, San Sebastian
20012, Spain.
RP Martinez-Sanchis, P (corresponding author), Univ Deusto, Deusto Business Sch
DBS, Camino Mundaiz 50, San Sebastian 20012, Spain.
EM paula.msanchis@deusto.es; cristina.aragon@deusto.es;
cristina.iturrioz@deusto.es
RI Martinez-Sanchis, Paula/A-5136-2019
OI Martinez-Sanchis, Paula/0000-0001-7932-4566
FU Basque Family Firm Association (AEFAME); Basque Government Department of
Education, Language Policy and Culture; Antonio Aranzabal Foundation
FX We acknowledge the financial support of the Basque Family Firm
Association (AEFAME) and the Basque Government Department of Education,
Language Policy and Culture. We would also like to thank the Antonio
Aranzabal Foundation for its support and Katiuska Cabrera-Suarez for her
helpful suggestions regarding an early version of this paper.
CR [Anonymous], 2019, PALGRAVE HDB HETEROG, P715, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-77676-
7_26, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-77676-7_26]
Amonarriz CA, 2016, BUS ETHICS, V25, P75, DOI 10.1111/beer.12078
Aragon-Amonarriz C, 2019, J BUS ETHICS, V159, P161, DOI 10.1007/s10551-017-3728-
7
Arregle JL, 2007, J MANAGE STUD, V44, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00665.x
Avolio BJ, 2009, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V60, P421, DOI
10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
BABAD EY, 1982, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V74, P459, DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.459
BANDURA A, 1986, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V4, P359, DOI 10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI
Bargh JA, 2006, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V15, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.0963-
7214.2006.00395.x
Basco R., 2017, J BUSINESS EC, V87, P487, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11573-016-0828-2
Baxter P, 2008, QUAL REP, V13, P544
Bertschi-Michel A, 2020, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V44, P81, DOI
10.1177/1042258719834016
Bowers D. G., 1966, ADM SCI Q, V11, P238, DOI [DOI 10.2307/2391247,
10.2307/2391247.JSTOR.]
Cater JJ, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P109, DOI 10.1177/0894486508327822
Chen G, 2003, ACAD MANAGE J, V46, P591, DOI 10.2307/30040651
Collins J.D., 2016, J SMALL BUS STRATEGY, V26, P51
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
De Massis A, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P278, DOI 10.1177/0894486516656276
Decker C., 2016, ROUTLEDGE COMPANION, DOI [10.4324/9781315688053-11., DOI
10.4324/9781315688053-11]
Eddleston KA, 2012, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V36, P369, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2010.00403.x
EDEN D, 1982, ORGAN BEHAV HUM PERF, V30, P351, DOI 10.1016/0030-5073(82)90225-2
EDEN D, 1991, J APPL PSYCHOL, V76, P770, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.770
EDEN D, 1993, J APPL PSYCHOL, V78, P352, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.352
Eden D, 2000, LEADERSHIP QUART, V11, P171, DOI 10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00042-4
Eden D., 1990, PYGMALION MANAGEMENT
Eden D, 1988, ACAD MANAGEMENT REV, V13, P639, DOI DOI 10.2307/258381
EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P532, DOI 10.2307/258557
Ensley MD, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P267, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00082.x
European Commission, 2009, EC CRIS EUR CAUS CON
Flick U., 2004, COMPANION QUALITATIV
Gagne M, 2019, FAM BUS REV, DOI 10.1177/0894486519894759
Gagne M, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P292, DOI 10.1177/0894486511410688
Garcia P., 2017, PARENTAL BEHAV NEXT
Gioia DA, 2013, ORGAN RES METHODS, V16, P15, DOI 10.1177/1094428112452151
 GIST ME, 1989, J APPL PSYCHOL, V74, P884, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.884
HARRIS MJ, 1985, PSYCHOL BULL, V97, P363, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.363
Hernandez Sampieri C. R., 1991, METODOLOGIA INVESTIG
Ilies R, 2006, J LEADERSH ORG STUD, V13, P1, DOI DOI
10.1177/10717919070130010301
Janjuha-Jivraj S, 2009, INT SMALL BUS J, V27, P702, DOI 10.1177/0266242609344252
Jenner H., 1990, ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT, V7, P127, DOI 10.1300/J020V07N02_09.
Jiang DS, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P125, DOI 10.1177/0894486517736959
Cabrera-Suarez MK, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P178, DOI 10.1177/0894486518776867
Cabrera-Suarez MK, 2012, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V23, P2736, DOI
10.1080/09585192.2012.676458
Kierein NM, 2000, J ORGAN BEHAV, V21, P913, DOI 10.1002/1099-
1379(200012)21:8<913::AID-JOB62>3.0.CO;2-#
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Leana CR, 1999, ACAD MANAGE REV, V24, P538, DOI 10.2307/259141
LEARMAN LA, 1990, J AM GERIATR SOC, V38, P797, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-
5415.1990.tb01472.x
Leiss G, 2018, J FAM BUS MANAG, V8, P75, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-09-2017-0025
Marler L. E., 2017, J MANAGERIAL ISSUES, V29, P57
McCutcheon D. M., 1993, Journal of Operations Management, V11, P239, DOI
10.1016/0272-6963(93)90002-7
McNatt DB, 2000, J APPL PSYCHOL, V85, P314, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.314
Meier O, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P256, DOI 10.1177/0894486516646260
Miles M. B., 1994, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA
Nelson T, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1177/0894486517715390
Phillips JM, 1997, J APPL PSYCHOL, V82, P792, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.792
Pittino D, 2017, EUR MANAG J, V35, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2016.07.003
Rauer AJ, 2007, PERS RELATIONSHIP, V14, P495, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-
6811.2007.00168.x
ROSENTHAL R, 1994, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V3, P176, DOI 10.1111/1467-
8721.ep10770698
Rosenthal R, 2003, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V12, P151, DOI 10.1111/1467-8721.t01-1-
01250
ROSENTHAL R, 1978, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V1, P377, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00075506
Rosenthal R., 1968, URBAN REV, V3, P16, DOI [10.1007/BF02322211, DOI
10.1007/BF02322211]
Rosenthal R., 1993, STUDIES EMOTION SOCI
Salvato C, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P259, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00127.x
Salvato C, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P235, DOI 10.1177/0894486513490796
Sanchez-Ruiz P, 2019, FAM BUS REV, V32, P131, DOI 10.1177/0894486519836833
Seymour K. C., 1993, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V6, P263
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P, 2020, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V44, P3, DOI 10.1177/1042258719879675
Sy T, 2010, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V113, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.06.001
Tunkkari-Eskelinen M, 2016, PROC EUR CONF ENTREP, P827
Van Gils A., 2004, European Management Journal, V22, P588, DOI
10.1016/j.emj.2004.09.015
van Gils S, 2010, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V19, P333, DOI 10.1080/13594320902978458
Venter E, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P283, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00049.x
WEICK KE, 1984, AM PSYCHOL, V39, P40, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.39.1.40
White SS, 2000, LEADERSHIP QUART, V11, P389, DOI 10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00046-1
Whiteley P, 2012, LEADERSHIP QUART, V23, P822, DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.006
Yin R, 2003, APPL CASE STUDY RES
Yin RK, 2013, EVALUATION-US, V19, P321, DOI 10.1177/1356389013497081
Yu XD, 2020, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V44, P134, DOI 10.1177/1042258719838256
Zellweger T, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P1041, DOI 10.1111/etap.12161
Zellweger TM, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P229, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2011.00466.x
 Zikmund W. G., 2008, SAMPL DES SAMPL P BU
NR 83
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0263-2373
EI 1873-5681
J9 EUR MANAG J
JI Eur. Manag. J.
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 38
IS 6
BP 914
EP 926
DI 10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.005
PG 13
WC Business; Management
SC Business & Economics
GA PB6NP
UT WOS:000596435600008
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Johnson, CL
Carlson, SL
AF Johnson, Carrie L.
Carlson, Shawn L.
TI Farm/Ranch Succession Planning Program Motivates Families to Take Steps
SO JOURNAL OF EXTENSION
LA English
DT Article
DE succession planning; farm/ranch transfer; programming; curriculum
AB The United States is experiencing increased aging of farmers and ranchers,
highlighting the need for succession planning programs that can help prepare them
for successful transfer of land and assets to a successor. We discuss the Design
Your Succession Plan program and its evaluation. The program consists of three
sessions that address multiple topics regarding succession planning. Over a 5-year
period, 516 participants from across North Dakota attended the program. Results
from retrospective pretest/posttest surveys indicate that the program had a
significant impact on increasing knowledge and confidence among participants.
Implementation can assist aging farm and ranch families across the country.
C1 [Johnson, Carrie L.; Carlson, Shawn L.] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Human Dev
& Family Sci, Fargo, ND 58105 USA.
RP Johnson, CL (corresponding author), North Dakota State Univ, Dept Human Dev &
Family Sci, Fargo, ND 58105 USA.
EM carrie.johnson.1@ndsu.edu
CR Earls A, 2018, J RURAL COMMUNITY D, V13, P25
Hogge J, 2017, J EXT, V55
Kaplan M. S., 2009, J EXTENSION, V47
Mishra AK, 2008, REV ECON HOUSEHOLD, V6, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11150-008-9032-7
National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2019, 2017 CENS AGR US SUM, V1
Withrow-Robinson B., 2012, J EXTENSION, V50
NR 6
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU UNIV OF WISCONSIN EXTENSION JOURNAL INC
PI MADISON
PA 605 EXTENSION BLDG 432 NORTH LAKE ST, MADISON, WI 53706 USA
SN 0022-0140
EI 1077-5315
J9 J EXT
JI J. Ext.
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 58
IS 6
AR v58-6iw5
PG 6
WC Education & Educational Research
SC Education & Educational Research
GA PG8CJ
UT WOS:000599956600014
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Feldmann, M
Lukes, M
Uhlaner, L
AF Feldmann, Manuel
Lukes, Martin
Uhlaner, Lorraine
TI Disentangling succession and entrepreneurship gender gaps: gender norms,
culture, and family
SO SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Entrepreneurship; Family embeddedness; Gender; Culture; Family business
succession; Self-employment
ID CAREER CHOICE INTENTIONS; WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS; SELF-EMPLOYMENT;
INTERNATIONAL-BUSINESS; EMBEDDEDNESS; CHALLENGES
AB This study adapts a multi-level view of culture, including society- and family-
based gender norms and the family embeddedness perspective, to predict the career
status of a sample of 2897 young Europeans (aged 18-35) from 11 countries, with at
least one self-employed parent. We find that gender identity is associated with
career status such that a woman is more likely than a man to be an employee vs. a
successor to a family firm but no less likely to be a founder as compared with
either being an employee or successor. However, certain family and society-level
culture variables combined with gender identity reverse these trends. A woman with
caring responsibilities is more likely to be a successor than either a founder or
employee. Also, while two-way interaction effects for traditional gender norms and
having a self-employed mother are weak or not significant, the study finds that in
combination, a woman reporting both traditional gender norms and having a self-
employed mother is more likely to be a successor than being either an employee or a
founder, reversing gender identity main effects. Incorporating the family
embeddedness perspective and the role of culture in occupational choice, we develop
a better view of the gender gap in entrepreneurship, finding that the family may
serve as a stronger influence than society when implied norms of these two levels
of culture clash. By examining actual rather than intended career choice, we also
contribute to the occupational choice literature on youth employment.
C1 [Feldmann, Manuel] Heidelberg Univ, Fac Econ & Social Sci, Bergheimer Str 58, D-
69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
[Lukes, Martin] Prague Univ Econ & Business, Dept Entrepreneurship, Nam W
Churchilla 4, Prague 13067 3, Czech Republic.
[Uhlaner, Lorraine] EDHEC Business Sch, Dept Management & Humanities, 24 Ave
Gustave Delory,CS 50411, F-59057 Roubaix 1, France.
RP Feldmann, M (corresponding author), Heidelberg Univ, Fac Econ & Social Sci,
Bergheimer Str 58, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
EM manuel.m.feldmann@gmail.com; martin.lukes@vse.cz; uhlaner@gmail.com
FU project Cultural Pathways to Economic Self-Sufficiency and
Entrepreneurship (CUPESSE; Seventh Framework Programme) [613257]
FX We gratefully acknowledge financial support by the project Cultural
Pathways to Economic Self-Sufficiency and Entrepreneurship (CUPESSE;
Seventh Framework Programme, grant agreement Nr. 613257). We are also
indebted to the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive
feedback. Finally, this paper has benefited from presentations at the
18th European Academy of Management (EURAM) conference in Reykjavik and
the 78th Academy of Management (AOM) conference in Chicago.
CR Ahl H, 2006, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V30, P595, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2006.00138.x
Aldrich HE, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P573, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
Azmat F, 2016, ENTREP REGION DEV, V28, P630, DOI 10.1080/08985626.2016.1208279
Baughn CC, 2006, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V30, P687, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2006.00142.x
Bloemen-Bekx M, 2019, INT SMALL BUS J, V37, P642, DOI 10.1177/0266242619838936
Braun M, 2009, SOC RES TODAY, P358
Bullough A, 2017, CROSS CULT STRATEG M, V24, P211, DOI 10.1108/CCSM-02-2017-0011
Bullough A, 2017, J MANAGE, V43, P2037, DOI 10.1177/0149206314561302
Campopiano G, 2017, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V8, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.09.001
Diamond M., 2002, CLIN CHILD PSYCHOL P, V7, P320, DOI DOI
10.1177/1359104502007003002
Elam A, 2010, EUR J DEV RES, V22, P331, DOI 10.1057/ejdr.2010.19
Greene FJ, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P687, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2011.00484.x
Hair J., 2010, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN, V7th ed.,
Hoffmann A, 2015, SMALL BUS ECON, V44, P79, DOI 10.1007/s11187-014-9586-0
House R, 2002, J WORLD BUS, V37, P3, DOI 10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00069-4
Hytti U, 2017, INT SMALL BUS J, V35, P665, DOI 10.1177/0266242616675924
Jennings JE, 2013, ACAD MANAG ANN, V7, P663, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2013.782190
Karaca-Mandic P, 2012, HEALTH SERV RES, V47, P255, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-
6773.2011.01314.x
Karatas-Ozkan M, 2011, INT J CROSS CULT MAN, V11, P203, DOI
10.1177/1470595811399189
Kubicek A, 2019, REV MANAG SCI, V13, P963, DOI 10.1007/s11846-018-0278-z
Leung K, 2005, J INT BUS STUD, V36, P357, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400150
Lindquist MJ, 2015, J LABOR ECON, V33, P269, DOI 10.1086/678493
Lukes M, 2019, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V682, P156, DOI 10.1177/0002716219828976
Markussen S, 2017, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V134, P356, DOI
10.1016/j.jebo.2016.12.013
Marlow S, 2018, INT SMALL BUS J, V36, P3, DOI 10.1177/0266242617738321
Marlow S, 2013, INT J ENTREP BEHAV R, V19, P114, DOI 10.1108/13552551311299288
Nelson T, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1177/0894486517715390
Norton EC, 2004, STATA J, V4, P154, DOI 10.1177/1536867X0400400206
Noseleit F, 2014, SMALL BUS ECON, V43, P549, DOI 10.1007/s11187-014-9570-8
Overbeke KK, 2013, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V4, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.07.002
Pearse R, 2016, FEM ECON, V22, P30, DOI 10.1080/13545701.2015.1078485
Plummer LA, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P1585, DOI 10.5465/amj.2013.0100
Rothausen TJ, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P220, DOI 10.1177/0894486509337409
Schroder E, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P305, DOI 10.1177/0894486511416977
 Storey D. J., 2010, SMALL BUSINESS ENTRE
Tosun J, 2019, EUR POLIT SCI, V18, P510, DOI 10.1057/s41304-018-0186-3
Wellington AJ, 2006, LABOUR ECON, V13, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.labeco.2004.10.005
Welter F., 2014, GENDERING ENTREPRENE, V1, P14, DOI DOI 10.2139/ssrn.2557272
Williams R, 2012, STATA J, V12, P308, DOI 10.1177/1536867X1201200209
Zellweger T, 2011, J BUS VENTURING, V26, P521, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.04.001
Zouhar J., 2016, PRAGUE ECON PAP, V2016, P19, DOI DOI 10.18267/J.PEP.534
NR 41
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 5
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0921-898X
EI 1573-0913
J9 SMALL BUS ECON
JI Small Bus. Econ. Group
DI 10.1007/s11187-020-00430-z
EA NOV 2020
PG 17
WC Business; Economics; Management
SC Business & Economics
GA OU0KX
UT WOS:000591226600001
OA Other Gold
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Tirdasari, NL
Dhewanto, W
AF Tirdasari, Nyayu Lathifah
Dhewanto, Wawan
TI When is the right time for succession? Multiple cases of family
businesses in Indonesia
SO JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Family business; Succession; Food industry; Business continuance
AB Purpose Succession timing plays a key role in the part of the succession
process. While much notice has been given solely to the viewpoint of predecessor
and successor, less known about the schedule during this most critical family
business dealings. The purpose of this research is to assess the right time for
predecessors to let go of their leadership and allow the successor to take charge
of the family business. Notably, it considers how the process of interaction
between predecessor and successor may encourage successor capability, succeed the
family business and following implications for the succession process as well.
Design/methodology/approach An exploratory comparative case study design employed
in order to disclose the time by time activities around the succession process.
This study presented circa 11 case studies from family businesses of the food
industry. Data gathered utilizing semi-structured interviews and formal secondary
data from the organizations, all of whom operate in Java, Indonesia. Findings
Findings reveal five critical outcomes. First, the results show that most of the
respondents had no written succession plan and did not keep up the developmental
stages, but the succession process was successful. Second, the study found a
reduced age of successor even though the stages increase. Third, the respondents
did not know when was the predecessor is getting busy managing the business, and
some successors did not attend college as well. Fourth, the succession process of
RC is the fastest and TY is the longest. Last, the succession process of the
second-generation family business is faster than the third-generation.
Originality/value This paper presents further evidence of the succession process of
family businesses. It moves beyond a timing explanation of succession to develop a
more sequentially aware understanding of the agility within the succession process.
It contributes to the limited references of the family business in the food
industry in Indonesia as well.
C1 [Tirdasari, Nyayu Lathifah] IPB Univ Bogor Agr Univ, Sch Business, Bogor,
Indonesia.
[Dhewanto, Wawan] ITB, Sch Business & Management, Bandung, Indonesia.
RP Tirdasari, NL (corresponding author), IPB Univ Bogor Agr Univ, Sch Business,
Bogor, Indonesia.
EM nyayu.lathifah@apps.ipb.ac.id; w_dhewanto@sbm-itb.ac.id
RI Dhewanto, Wawan/Q-1101-2019
OI Dhewanto, Wawan/0000-0002-6705-5191
FU BOPTN DIKTI
FX This research is funded by BOPTN DIKTI 2012.
CR Amelia L., 2017, ANALISIS PETA IND MA
Astrachan J. H., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P211, DOI DOI
10.1177/08944865030160030601
Braun V., 2006, QUALITATIVE RES PSYC, V3, P77, DOI [DOI
10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
Brockhaus R.H., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P165, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2004.00011.X
Collins J., 2009, NHRD NETWORK J, V2, P102, DOI [10.1177/0974173920090719, DOI
10.1177/0974173920090719]
Cooper DR, 2014, BUSINESS RES METHODS
Fletcher D, 2016, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V7, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001
Getz D., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P89, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00089.X
Hall P., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P51, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1988.00051.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1988.00051.X]
Kodrat D.S., 2008, USAHAWAN, V6, P27
Kotter J.P., 1996, LEADING CHANGE
Lansberg I., 1999, SUCCEEDING GENERATIO
Paisner M. B., 1999, SUSTAINING FAMILY BU
Poza E.J., 2010, ADV ENTREPRENEURSHIP, V12, P359, DOI [10.1108/S1074-
7540(2010)0000012020, DOI 10.1108/S1074-7540(2010)0000012020]
Soedibyo M., 2012, FAMILY BUSINESS RESP
Wasim J, 2018, INT J ENTREP BEHAV R, V26, P141, DOI 10.1108/IJEBR-05-2017-0167
Winoto P., 2008, ANALISIS INTERAKSI M, V14, P65
Yin R.K., 2014, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
Zahra S.A., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P331
NR 19
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BINGLEY
PA HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
SN 2043-6238
EI 2043-6246
J9 J FAM BUS MANAG
JI J. Fam. Bus. Manag.
PY 2020
VL 10
IS 4
SI SI
BP 349
EP 359
DI 10.1108/JFBM-10-2019-0064
EA NOV 2020
PG 11
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA QE0LX
UT WOS:000592678400001
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Urban, B
Nonkwelo, RP
AF Urban, Boris
Nonkwelo, Ruth Palesa
TI Intra-family dynamics and succession planning in family businesses in
South Africa: the daughter as a potential successor
SO JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Succession; Parent-daughter relationship; Intra-family dynamics;
Cohesiveness; Adaptiveness; South Africa
ID FIRMS; GENDER; CHALLENGES; TRENDS; MODEL
AB Purpose Literature considers the succession process to be successful when both
the continuity of the business and harmony within the family are preserved. This
study empirically investigates intra-family dynamics with regard to daughters as
potential successors in family businesses. Design/methodology/approach The study
takes place in South Africa where family businesses represent a significant amount
of all listed businesses on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. A structured survey
instrument is used to collect primary data from family businesses in South Africa.
The study hypotheses are statistically tested using regression analyses. Findings
Results highlight the importance of the business context (BC), intra-family
cohesion (IFC), intra-family adaptability (IFA) as well as the parent-daughter
relationship (PDR) in successful daughter succession planning (SP). An important
insight which emerges from the findings is the extent to which a harmonious
business environment is conducive in accommodating the daughter as a successor to
the business. Practical implications Family business owners need to be aware of the
often conflicting pressures that daughters face as potential successors. Evidence-
based and fit for purpose to the South African family BC processes and directives
must be formulated that guide the implementation of SP. The provision of training
specifically focused on gender bias issues and women empowerment programmes in
family business is recommended. Originality/value Investigating theoretical and
practical problems related to daughters in SP in South Africa is important
considering that firms in African countries in general tend to be poorly managed.
C1 [Urban, Boris; Nonkwelo, Ruth Palesa] Univ Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South
Africa.
RP Urban, B (corresponding author), Univ Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
EM boris.urban@wits.ac.za
CR Astrachan J. H., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P211, DOI DOI
10.1177/08944865030160030601
Barrett M., 2014, BEING PRACTICAL THEO, P168
Benavides-Velasco CA, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V40, P41, DOI 10.1007/s11187-011-
9362-3
Bizri R, 2016, INT J ENTREP BEHAV R, V22, P133, DOI 10.1108/IJEBR-01-2015-0020
Byrne J, 2019, EUR MANAG REV, V16, P579, DOI 10.1111/emre.12298
 Calabro A, 2018, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V39, P2014, DOI 10.1002/smj.2760
Campopiano G, 2017, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V8, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.09.001
Chrisman J.J., 2003, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P237
Constantinidis C., 2009, INT MANAG, V14, P43
Cooper DR, 2014, BUSINESS RES METHODS
Cooper JT, 2013, FAM RELAT, V62, P457, DOI 10.1111/fare.12012
Daspit J.J., 2017, J MANAGERIAL ISSUES, V29, P6
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
De Massis A, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P278, DOI 10.1177/0894486516656276
Frank H, 2017, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V41, P709, DOI 10.1111/etap.12229
Garcia PRJM, 2019, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V43, P224, DOI 10.1177/1042258718796087
Gilding M, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P299, DOI 10.1111/etap.12040
Glover JL, 2014, INT J GEND ENTREP, V6, P276, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-01-2012-0006
Glover JL, 2015, FAM BUS REV, V28, P163, DOI 10.1177/0894486513511814
Habbershon T.G., 2003, J ORGAN CHANGE MANAG, V16, P135
Haberman H, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P163, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00088.x
Hjorth D, 2016, ORGAN STUD, V37, P1089, DOI 10.1177/0170840615613375
Humphreys MMC, 2013, J FAM BUS MANAG, V3, P24, DOI 10.1108/20436231311326472
Hytti U, 2017, INT SMALL BUS J, V35, P665, DOI 10.1177/0266242616675924
Kaunda S., 2013, EUROPEAN J BUSINESS, V5, P157
Kiwia RH, 2020, J FAM BUS MANAG, V10, P213, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-03-2019-0018
Kjellman AJ, 2014, J FAM BUS MANAG, V4, P194, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-06-2012-0019
Kubiek A., 2018, REV MANAGERIAL SCI, V13, P1
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Makiwane M, 2017, S AFR REV SOCIOL, V48, P49, DOI 10.1080/21528586.2017.1288166
Jimenez RM, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P53, DOI 10.1177/0894486508328813
Matser I., 2020, J FAMILY BUSINESS MA, DOI [10.1108/JFBM-09-2018-0048, DOI
10.1108/JFBM-09-2018-0048]
Mischel L., 2011, AM J EC BUSINESS ADM, V3, P270
Mussolino D, 2019, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V10, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.01.003
Nelson T, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1177/0894486517715390
Nordqvist M., 2015, THEORETICAL PERSPECT
Phikiso Z., 2017, ACAD ENTREP J, V23, P1
Riordan D. A., 1993, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V31, P66
SACCI: South African Chamber of Commerce and Industry, 2018, S AFR CHAMB COMM
IND
Felix EGS, 2019, J FAM BUS MANAG, V9, P228, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-10-2018-0051
Schulze WS, 2001, ORGAN SCI, V12, P99, DOI 10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
Sharma P, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P5, DOI 10.1177/0894486512437626
Maciel AS, 2015, J FAM BUS MANAG, V5, P238, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-11-2014-0036
Urban B., 2010, S AFRICAN J HUMAN RE, V9, P1
van der Merwe SP, 2012, S AFR J BUS MANAG, V43, P17, DOI 10.4102/sajbm.v43i4.479
Venter R., 2015, ENTREPRENEURSHIP THE
Venter W P, 2010, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business,
V11, P263
Vera CF, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00051.x
Xi J, 2015, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V11, P113, DOI 10.1007/s11365-013-0286-z
Zellweger T., 2017, MANAGING FAMILY BUSI
NR 50
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BINGLEY
PA HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
SN 2043-6238
EI 2043-6246
J9 J FAM BUS MANAG
JI J. Fam. Bus. Manag.
DI 10.1108/JFBM-08-2020-0084
EA NOV 2020
PG 14
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA OT5JB
UT WOS:000590881100001
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Romero-Padilla, A
Marquez-Berber, SR
Santoyo-Cortes, VH
Ayala-Garay, AV
Altamirano-Cardenas, JR
AF Romero-Padilla, A.
Marquez-Berber, S. R.
Santoyo-Cortes, V. H.
Ayala-Garay, A., V
Altamirano-Cardenas, J. R.
TI Farm succession of family farms in Mexico center
SO ITEA-INFORMACION TECNICA ECONOMICA AGRARIA
LA Spanish
DT Article
DE Generational renewal; aging; family farming
ID RETIREMENT
AB In Mexican agriculture, family farms predominate and consequently the
transmission of their management and ownership affects their continuity and
competitiveness. This study describes the succession scenarios in three contrasting
regions of central Mexico using surveys addressed to producers and generates a
producers typology according to their modalities and prospects of succession
through multivariate methods. The results show that succession is not planned
because there is the expectation that the process will not have any conflict. Four
types of successions were identified according to the existence of a succession
plan and interest of continuing in the agricultural activity. The most significant
variables that explain the succession types identified are the age of the farmer,
the destination of production and the cost of land. Succession is not considered by
families and governments, however, its implications are important for family
heritage and agricultural activity. Therefore it is necessary to develop training
and advising programs to producers on this subject.
C1 [Romero-Padilla, A.; Santoyo-Cortes, V. H.; Altamirano-Cardenas, J. R.] Univ
Autonoma Chapingo, Ctr Invest Econ Sociales & Tecnol Agroind & Agr M, Texcoco
56230, Mexico.
[Marquez-Berber, S. R.] Secretaria Desarrollo Rural, Direcc Planeac Precios
Garantia & Estimulos, Mexico City 03310, DF, Mexico.
[Ayala-Garay, A., V] Inst Nacl Invest Forestales Agr & Pecuarias, Mexico City
56230, DF, Mexico.
RP Santoyo-Cortes, VH (corresponding author), Univ Autonoma Chapingo, Ctr Invest
Econ Sociales & Tecnol Agroind & Agr M, Texcoco 56230, Mexico.
EM hsantoyo@ciestaam.edu.mx
CR Barclay E., 2007, FARM SUCCESSION INHE
Barnes G, 2009, LAND USE POLICY, V26, P393, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.007
Belausteguigoitia Rius I, 2012, EMPRESAS FAMILIA RES
Bertoni D, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V57, P739, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.002
Burholt V, 2012, J RURAL STUD, V28, P432, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.009
Burton RJF, 2005, J RURAL STUD, V21, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.04.004
 Castillo-Quero M, 2019, ITEA-INF TEC ECON AG, V115, P62, DOI
10.12706/itea.2019.004
Cavicchioli D, 2018, J RURAL STUD, V61, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.06.002
CEPAL, 2018, SIST REG IND ENV
Downey H, 2016, J AGING STUD, V38, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jaging.2016.04.007
Duesberg S, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V61, P526, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.007
FAO-SAGARPA, 2014, EST ENV POBL RUR MEX
Ganga-Contreras F, 2016, CONVERGENCIA, V23, P175
García Ballesteros Aurora, 2016, Invest. Geog, V0, P58, DOI 10.14350/rig.47362
Gill F, 2013, TIME SOC, V22, P76, DOI 10.1177/0961463X10380023
Inwood SM, 2012, J RURAL STUD, V28, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.07.005
Kaplan M.S., 2009, J EXTENSION, V47, P1
Kerbler B, 2012, AGR ECON-CZECH, V58, P285, DOI 10.17221/47/2011-AGRICECON
Kwanmuang Kanjana, 2011, Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agriculture, V6,
P181
Lagunas-Vazques M, 2018, DESACATOS, V58, P148
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Lobley M, 2010, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V1, P49, DOI 10.5304/jafscd.2010.011.009
Mishra AK, 2010, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V35, P133
Neiman M, 2017, PAPERS, V102, P509, DOI 10.5565/rev/papers.2269
Nuthall PL, 2017, J AGRIC EDUC EXT, V23, P39, DOI 10.1080/1389224X.2016.1200992
Mendoza-Rosas AR, 2018, AGRIC SOC DESARRO, V15, P339
Sánchez González Diego, 2015, Rev. geogr. Norte Gd., P97
Uchiyama T., 2008, Japanese Journal of Rural Economics, V10, P33
Wealth B, 2009, BARCLAYS WEALTH INSI, V8
Weiss C. R., 2004, REV ECON HOUSEHOLD, V2, P443, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11150-004-
5656-4
Wheeler S, 2012, J RURAL STUD, V28, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.04.001
Zagata L, 2015, J RURAL STUD, V38, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.003
Zysno P. V., 1997, METHODS PSYCHOL RES, V2, P41
NR 33
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU ASOCIACION INTERPROFESIONAL DESARROLLO AGARIO
PI ZARAGOZA
PA AVDA MONTANANA 930, APARTADO 727, ZARAGOZA, 50080, SPAIN
SN 1699-6887
J9 ITEA-INF TEC ECON AG
JI ITEA-Inf. Tec. Econ. Agrar.
PD NOV
PY 2020
VL 116
IS 4
BP 353
EP 370
DI 10.12706/itea.2020.007
PG 18
WC Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science; Agronomy
SC Agriculture
GA OW2AC
UT WOS:000592695500006
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Xian, HP
 Jiang, N
McAdam, M
AF Xian, Huiping
Jiang, Nan
McAdam, Maura
TI Negotiating the female successor-leader role within family business
succession in China
SO INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL-RESEARCHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE China; family business; female; women successors; gender roles; role
conflict; role identity; succession
ID IDENTITY WORK; GENDER; WOMEN; FIRMS; PERFORMANCE; CONSTRUCTION; FUTURE;
ENTREPRENEURS; LEGITIMATION; REFLECTIONS
AB This article explores the approaches of identity construction used by Chinese
daughters while negotiating the successor-leader role within family businesses. A
qualitative interpretivist approach was adopted to understand daughter views on
gender, family business leadership and succession, as well as the approaches
adopted to negotiate the role of female successor/leader in the Chinese family
business. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with both actual and
potential female successors. Three approaches of identity construction emerged
based on the degree of conformity to traditional gender roles and Confucian family
values: first, to abide by conventional gender expectations and perceive themselves
as a temporary leader; second, to act as the 'second leader' and remain involved in
decision making and third, to challenge conventional gender roles and strive to be
an independent leader. This article contributes to debates on women in family
business and gendered identity construction of daughters in family business in the
Chinese context.
C1 [Xian, Huiping] Univ Sheffield, Management Sch, Conduit Rd, Sheffield S10 1FL, S
Yorkshire, England.
[Jiang, Nan] Coventry Univ London, Univ House, Coventry, W Midlands, England.
[McAdam, Maura] Dublin City Univ, Management, Dublin, Ireland.
[McAdam, Maura] Dublin City Univ, Entrepreneurship, Dublin, Ireland.
RP Xian, HP (corresponding author), Univ Sheffield, Management Sch, Conduit Rd,
Sheffield S10 1FL, S Yorkshire, England.
EM h.xian@sheffield.ac.uk
OI Xian, Huiping/0000-0002-7699-3294; McAdam, Maura/0000-0003-2203-5485
CR Al-Dajani H, 2010, INT SMALL BUS J, V28, P470, DOI 10.1177/0266242610370392
Aldamiz-Echevarria C., 2017, EUROPEAN J FAMILY BU, V7, P54
Alrubaishi D, 2020, INT J ENTREP INNOV, DOI 10.1177/1465750320930869
Alvesson M., 2009, UNDERSTANDING GENDER, V2nd ed.
Alvesson M, 2008, ORGANIZATION, V15, P5, DOI 10.1177/1350508407084426
Baker S. E., 2012, MANY QUALITATIVE INT
BOJE DM, 1991, ADMIN SCI QUART, V36, P106, DOI 10.2307/2393432
Braun V., 2006, QUALITATIVE RES PSYC, V3, P77, DOI [DOI
10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
Burke PJ, 2007, SOC PSYCHOL QUART, V70, P27, DOI 10.1177/019027250707000105
Burke PJ, 2006, SOC PSYCHOL QUART, V69, P81, DOI 10.1177/019027250606900106
Byrne J, 2018, EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT, DOI [10.1111/emre.12298., DOI
10.1111/EMRE.12298.]
Campopiano G, 2017, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V8, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.09.001
Cao J, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V33, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.005
Carney M, 2011, ACAD MANAGE J, V54, P437, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2011.61967812
Chen SH, 2018, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V35, P181, DOI 10.1007/s10490-017-9515-2
Chua J. H. J. J., 1999, ENTREPRENEURSHIP THE, V23, P19, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879902300402
Cole Patricia M., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P353, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1997.00353.X
Constantinidis C., 2009, INT MANAG, V14, P43
 Cook S, 2011, DEV CHANGE, V42, P947, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01721.x
Danes S. M., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P53, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00053.X
Datta PB, 2012, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V36, P569, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2012.00505.x
de Bruin A, 2007, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V31, P323, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2007.00176.x
De Clercq D, 2009, INT SMALL BUS J, V27, P395, DOI 10.1177/0266242609334971
DeCuir-Gunby JT, 2011, FIELD METHOD, V23, P136, DOI 10.1177/1525822X10388468
DeRue DS, 2010, ACAD MANAGE REV, V35, P627, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2010.53503267
DUBERLEY J, 2012, QUALITATIVE ORG RES, P15
Dumas C., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V11, P219, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1998.00219.X
Dumas C., 1992, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V16, P41, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879201600403
Essers C, 2007, ORGAN STUD, V28, P49, DOI 10.1177/0170840607068256
FISKE S T, 1989, P253
Gao HS, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V138, P683, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2892-x
Gao YN, 2014, EMERG MARK FINANC TR, V50, P126, DOI 10.2753/REE1540-496X500508
Glover JL, 2014, INT J GEND ENTREP, V6, P276, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-01-2012-0006
Golombisky K, 2006, WOMEN STUD COMMUN, V29, P165, DOI
10.1080/07491409.2006.10162497
Hamilton E, 2006, INT SMALL BUS J, V24, P253, DOI 10.1177/0266242606063432
Hamilton E, 2013, ENTREP REGION DEV, V25, P90, DOI 10.1080/08985626.2012.746879
Hill FM, 2006, VENTUR CAP, V8, P159, DOI 10.1080/13691060600555347
Hwang KK, 2012, INT CULT PSYCHOL, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-1439-1
Hytti U, 2017, INT SMALL BUS J, V35, P665, DOI 10.1177/0266242616675924
Jianghuai Zheng, 2009, Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, V1, P85, DOI
10.1108/17561390910956260
Cabrera-Suarez MK, 2012, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V23, P2736, DOI
10.1080/09585192.2012.676458
Keating N. C., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P157, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1997.00157.X
KELTNER D, 1995, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V68, P441, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.441
Kitching B. M., 2002, INT J ENTREPRENEURSH, V3, P145
Knapp JR, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P333, DOI 10.1177/0894486512474036
Kubicek A, 2019, REV MANAG SCI, V13, P963, DOI 10.1007/s11846-018-0278-z
Lam W, 2011, INT SMALL BUS J, V29, P508, DOI 10.1177/0266242610376357
Leung A. S. M., 2003, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, V20, P359, DOI
10.1023/A:1024049516797
Li Y, 2010, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V36, P187, DOI 10.1002/ab.20341
Lin XD, 2013, GENDER WORK ORGAN, V20, P498, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00598.x
Markoczy L, 2020, J BUS ETHICS, V165, P311, DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04104-z
Marlow S, 2020, INT J GEND ENTREP, V12, P39, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-05-2019-0090
Marlow S, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P791, DOI 10.1111/etap.12062
Martin L., 2001, WOMEN MANAGEMENT REV, V16, P222, DOI DOI
10.1108/EUM0000000005584
Jimenez RM, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P53, DOI 10.1177/0894486508328813
McAdam M, 2020, INT SMALL BUS J, V38, P139, DOI 10.1177/0266242619898610
Milton LP, 2008, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V32, P1063, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2008.00273.x
Mussolino D, 2019, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V10, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.01.003
Nekhili M, 2018, J BUS ETHICS, V153, P291, DOI 10.1007/s10551-016-3340-2
Nelson T, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1177/0894486517715390
Overbeke KK, 2015, FRONT PSYCHOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00625
Patil V, 2013, SIGNS, V38, P847, DOI 10.1086/669560
Pistrui D, 2006, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON FAMILY BUSINESS, P460
Pratt MG, 2008, ORGAN RES METHODS, V11, P481, DOI 10.1177/1094428107303349
Rowe B. R., 2000, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V13, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2000.00001.x
Schein VE, 2001, J SOC ISSUES, V57, P675, DOI 10.1111/0022-4537.00235
Shi Henry X., 2013, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small
Business, V20, P1
Sison AJG, 2020, J BUS ETHICS, V165, P241, DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04307-4
Sprague J., 2016, FEMINIST METHODOLOGI
Stoner J, 2011, J MANAGE PSYCHOL, V26, P94, DOI 10.1108/02683941111102146
Stryker S, 2000, SOC PSYCHOL QUART, V63, P284, DOI 10.2307/2695840
Swail J, 2018, ENTREP REGION DEV, V30, P256, DOI 10.1080/08985626.2017.1406539
Thoits PA, 2012, SOC PSYCHOL QUART, V75, P360, DOI 10.1177/0190272512459662
Ufuk H, 2001, J BUS ETHICS, V31, P95, DOI 10.1023/A:1010712023858
Vera CF, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00051.x
Wang C, 2010, J FAM ECON ISS, V31, P475, DOI 10.1007/s10834-010-9230-3
Wang DL, 2016, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V7, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.05.001
Watson TJ, 2009, INT SMALL BUS J, V27, P251, DOI 10.1177/0266242609102274
Wielsma AJ, 2019, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V10, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.01.006
Woodhams C, 2015, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V54, P913, DOI 10.1002/hrm.21643
Xian HP, 2008, QUAL RES ORGAN MANAG, V3, P231, DOI 10.1108/17465640810920304
Xie Y, 2014, GENDER FAMILY
Yan J, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P235, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00072.x
Zanoni P, 2007, J MANAGE STUD, V44, P1371, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00700.x
Zheng TT, 2012, GENDER PLACE CULT, V19, P652, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2011.649354
NR 85
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0266-2426
EI 1741-2870
J9 INT SMALL BUS J
JI Int. Small Bus. J.-Res. Entrep.
AR 0266242620960711
DI 10.1177/0266242620960711
EA OCT 2020
PG 27
WC Business; Management
SC Business & Economics
GA OB9GC
UT WOS:000578770100001
OA Green Accepted, Other Gold
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Gomez, MJG
AF Garcia Gomez, Maria Jose
TI Business families in Mexico. Generational succession and continuity in
the 20th century
SO HISTORIA MEXICANA
LA Spanish
DT Book Review
C1 [Garcia Gomez, Maria Jose] Univ Tecnol Mexico, Campus Sur, Mexico City, DF,
Mexico.
RP Gomez, MJG (corresponding author), Univ Tecnol Mexico, Campus Sur, Mexico City,
DF, Mexico.
CR ALMARAZ A, 2018, BUSINESS FAMILIES ME
NR 1
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU COLEGIO DE MEXICO CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS HISTORICOS
PI MEXICO CITY
PA DIR PABLO YANKELEVICH CAMINO AL AJUSCO 20, MEXICO CITY 10740, MEXICO
SN 0185-0172
EI 2448-6531
J9 HIST MEXICANA
JI Hist. Mex.
PD OCT-DEC
PY 2020
VL 70
IS 2
BP 1023
EP 1029
PG 7
WC History
SC History
GA PD6VB
UT WOS:000597819100023
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Martin-Cruz, N
Contreras, IB
Barahona, JH
Fernandez, HP
AF Martin-Cruz, Natalia
Barros Contreras, Ismael
Hernangomez Barahona, Juan
Perez Fernandez, Hector
TI Parents' Learning Mechanisms for Family Firm Succession: An Empirical
Analysis in Spain through the Lens of the Dynamic Capabilities Approach
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE succession; empirical&#8211; quantitative; structural equation modeling;
dynamic capability; parents&#8217; learning mechanisms; intentions;
family firm
ID PLS-SEM; STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; VALUE CREATION; MEDIATING ROLE;
SELF-EFFICACY; BUSINESS; KNOWLEDGE; RESOURCE; MODEL; PERFORMANCE
AB Succession is a concern for most family firms. The literature has addressed
succession in family firms from different perspectives. However, there are still
unaddressed questions concerning the microfoundations of succession, and there is a
need to secure a better understanding of the succession process and what role
parents play therein. Using the dynamic capabilities approach, we shed light on the
influence of parents' behaviors on successors' intentions. In particular, the paper
pursues a twofold aim; first, to analyze the effect of learning mechanisms that
parents deliberately use with their children in the family firm on the succession
dynamic capability; and second, to explore the impact of this dynamic capability of
successor intention to continue in the family firm. We test the model on a sample
of potential successors of family firms in Spain. Using partial least squares (PLS)
for a sample of 9146 individuals, we confirm the positive impact of the use of
parents' deliberate learning mechanisms on succession dynamic capability and, in
turn, the positive effect of the created succession dynamic capability on the
successor's intention to continue the family firm. Furthermore, we find that
perceived self-efficacy fails to have any effect on successor intention.
C1 [Martin-Cruz, Natalia; Hernangomez Barahona, Juan; Perez Fernandez, Hector] Univ
Valladolid, Sch Econ & Management, Valladolid 47002, Spain.
[Barros Contreras, Ismael] Univ Austral Chile, Dept Management & Ind, Puerto
Montt 5480000, Chile.
RP Contreras, IB (corresponding author), Univ Austral Chile, Dept Management & Ind,
Puerto Montt 5480000, Chile.
EM ambiela@eco.uva.es; ismaelbarros@uach.cl; jhernan@eco.uva.es;
hector.perez.fernandez@uva.es
FU MINECO [ECO2016-78128-P]
FX The authors want to acknowledge the financial support of ECO2016-78128-P
project, funded by MINECO.
CR Alonso AD, 2018, J FAM BUS MANAG, V8, P274, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-01-2018-0005
Alonso AD, 2019, J GEN MANAGE, V44, P96, DOI 10.1177/0306307018810585
Astrachan CB, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.12.002
ASTRACHAN J.H., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REVI, V15, P45, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00045.X
Barach J.A., 1995, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V8, P131, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1995.00131.X
Barros I, 2016, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V7, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.06.002
Becker JM, 2012, LONG RANGE PLANN, V45, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
Bontis N, 2007, MANAGE DECIS, V45, P1426, DOI 10.1108/00251740710828681
Boyd N. G., 1994, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V18, P63, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879401800404
Brandle L., 2018, J BUS VENTUR INSIGHT, V9, P17, DOI
[10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.12.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JBVI.2017.12.001]
Cadieux L., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P17, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00017.X
Vallejo MC, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P136, DOI 10.1177/0894486508327892
Carmines E.G., 1979, RELIABILITY VALIDITY, V17
Casprini E, 2017, J KNOWL MANAG, V21, P1459, DOI 10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0515
Chen CC, 1998, J BUS VENTURING, V13, P295, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00029-3
Chin W. W, 1999, STAT STRATEGIES SMAL, P307
Chin WW, 1998, MODERN METHODS BUSIN, V295, P336
Chirico F., 2014, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P201
Chirico F, 2007, ELECT J FAMILY BUSIN, V1, P62
Chirico F, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P169, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00117.x
Chirico F, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P318, DOI 10.1177/0894486511426284
Chirico F, 2011, STRATEG ENTREP J, V5, P307, DOI 10.1002/sej.121
Chirico F, 2010, INT SMALL BUS J, V28, P487, DOI 10.1177/0266242610370402
Chua J. H. J. J., 1999, ENTREPRENEURSHIP THE, V23, P19, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879902300402
Clark K. B., 1991, PRODUCT DEV PERFORMA
COLLIS DJ, 1994, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V15, P143, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250150910
Conz E, 2020, EUR MANAG J, V38, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.004
Corona J., 2015, EMPRESA FAMILIAR ESP
Corona J., 2006, IMAGEN EMPRESA FAMIL
Criaco G, 2017, SMALL BUS ECON, V49, P841, DOI 10.1007/s11187-017-9854-x
Daspit JJ, 2019, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V10, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.11.003
Daspit JJ, 2018, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V28, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.05.003
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
Dawson A., 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P545
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
De Massis A, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P386, DOI 10.1177/0894486518803422
Dillman DA, 2009, SOC SCI RES, V38, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.007
Drengner J, 2008, J ADVERTISING RES, V48, P138, DOI 10.2501/S0021849908080148
Eisenhardt KM, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P1105, DOI 10.1002/1097-
0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Faccin K, 2019, J KNOWL MANAG, V23, P439, DOI 10.1108/JKM-04-2018-0233
FORNELL C, 1981, J MARKETING RES, V18, P39, DOI 10.2307/3151312
Garcia PRJM, 2019, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V43, P224, DOI 10.1177/1042258718796087
George JM, 2001, J APPL PSYCHOL, V86, P513, DOI 10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.513
Goldberg S. D., 1993, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V6, P55, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1993.00055.X
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2003, ACAD MANAGE J, V46, P226, DOI 10.2307/30040616
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2007, ADMIN SCI QUART, V52, P106, DOI 10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Gruber M, 2010, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V31, P1337, DOI 10.1002/smj.865
Hair JF, 2014, EUR BUS REV, V26, P106, DOI 10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Helfat C.E., 2007, DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, P30
Hulland J, 1999, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V20, P195, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.3.CO;2-Z
HUNDLEBY JD, 1968, AM EDUC RES J, V5, P431
Cabrera-Suarez MK, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P178, DOI 10.1177/0894486518776867
Cabrera-Suarez MK, 2012, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V23, P2736, DOI
10.1080/09585192.2012.676458
Kidwell RE, 2018, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V28, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.05.002
Kolvereid L., 1996, ENTREPRENEURSH THEOR, V21, P47, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879602100104
Konopaski M, 2015, ACAD MANAG LEARN EDU, V14, P347, DOI 10.5465/amle.2014.0244
Krueger NF, 2000, J BUS VENTURING, V15, P411, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0
Lant TK, 2000, ADMIN SCI QUART, V45, P622, DOI 10.2307/2667112
Lee JSK, 2019, FAM BUS REV, V32, P259, DOI 10.1177/0894486519840248
Linan F, 2009, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V33, P593, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2009.00318.x
Lopez T, 2019, INT J ENTREP VENTUR, V11, P521, DOI 10.1504/IJEV.2019.103751
Luthje C, 2003, R&D MANAGE, V33, P135, DOI 10.1111/1467-9310.00288
Mathews C.H., 1995, ENTREP REGION DEV, V7, P365, DOI DOI
10.1080/08985629500000023
Moreno-Gomez J, 2019, J ENTREP EMERG ECON, V12, P413, DOI 10.1108/JEEE-04-2019-
0048
Nelson RR., 1982, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY
Nelson T, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1177/0894486517715390
Pieper TM, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P1313, DOI 10.1111/etap.12179
PODSAKOFF PM, 1986, J MANAGE, V12, P531, DOI 10.1177/014920638601200408
Podsakoff PM, 2003, J APPL PSYCHOL, V88, P879, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Richards M, 2019, FAM BUS REV, V32, P330, DOI 10.1177/0894486519833511
Roldan J. L., 2003, CRITICAL REFLECTIONS, P66, DOI [10.4018/978-1-59140-040-
0.ch004, DOI 10.4018/978-1-59140-040-0.CH004]
Ruiz J.M., 2013, J BUS ETHICS, V126, P259, DOI [10.1007/s10551-013-1941-6, DOI
10.1007/S10551-013-1941-6]
Salamzadeh A., 2014, INT J ENTREPRENEURSH, V21, P165, DOI DOI
10.1504/IJESB.2014.059471
Sanchez-Famoso V, 2014, EUR MANAG J, V32, P950, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2014.04.006
Sattler H, 2010, INT J RES MARK, V27, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.08.005
Schoemaker PJH, 2018, CALIF MANAGE REV, V61, P15, DOI 10.1177/0008125618790246
Segaro EL, 2014, INT BUS REV, V23, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.06.004
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sieger P., 2014, STUDENT ENTREPRENEUR
Sirmon DS, 2003, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V27, P339, DOI DOI 10.1111/1540-8520.T01-
1-00013
Teece D, 2016, CALIF MANAGE REV, V58, P13, DOI 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
Teece DJ, 2007, STRATEG MANAGE J, V28, P1319, DOI 10.1002/smj.640
Teece DJ, 2013, UNIVERSIA BUS REV, P18
Teece DJ, 2014, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V28, P328, DOI 10.5465/amp.2013.0116
Teece DJ, 2012, J MANAGE STUD, V49, P1395, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x
 Teece DJ, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P509, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tkachev A., 1999, ENTREP REGION DEV, V11, P269
Turner SL, 2003, MEAS EVAL COUNS DEV, V36, P83, DOI
10.1080/07481756.2003.12069084
Veciana JM., 2005, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V1, P165, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S11365-005-
1127-5, 10.1007/s11365-005-1127-5]
Ward J. L., 1987, KEEPING FAMILY BUSIN
Wittmann CM, 2009, IND MARKET MANAG, V38, P743, DOI
10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.02.007
Wulf T., 2010, J FAMILY BUSINESS ST, V1, P167, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.JFBS.2010.08.004
Zhao H, 2005, J APPL PSYCHOL, V90, P1265, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265
Zollo M, 2002, ORGAN SCI, V13, P339, DOI 10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
NR 94
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 19
AR 8220
DI 10.3390/su12198220
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
Environmental Studies
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA OO1QP
UT WOS:000587161400001
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Schlomer-Laufen, N
Rauch, A
AF Schloemer-Laufen, Nadine
Rauch, Andreas
TI Internal and external successions in family firms: a meta-analysis
SO JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Family business; Meta-analysis; Mode of succession
ID SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; BUSINESS SUCCESSION;
ANTECEDENTS; PERFORMANCE; PERSPECTIVE; DIMENSIONS; COMMITMENT; CHOICE;
JOIN
AB Purpose Despite much progress in the field of family business research, there is
still no unequivocal quantitative evidence on how many family businesses are
generally transferred within the family and how many are sold to nonfamily members.
Accordingly, the purpose of our paper is to overcome this data problem and to try
to get a better estimate of these rates. Design/methodology/approach To determine a
better estimate of intrafamily successions in Germany, we conducted a meta-analysis
of 33 samples from 27 studies covering 75,522 firms facing or having already faced
a business transfer. Findings Our results indicate that 62% of these family firms
are (planned to be) transferred to family members. This type of industry strongly
determines the mode of succession. However, methodological issues like study
quality and sample design also influence estimated succession rates. Practical
implications Policymakers need robust statistics so they can base their actions and
economic policies on reliable information. However, in the absence of official
statistics - as in the case of family firms handing over their company within or
outside the family - information is difficult to generate. Our findings provide a
generalizable estimate of prevalence rates, providing German policymakers, and
those in other countries when applying these methods, with useful information.
Originality/value This paper suggests that a theory of family firm succession needs
to consider more deeply the context in which succession decisions occur. By
exploring variables affecting succession rates such as firm size and industry but
also methodological issues like sample design and study quality, our analysis also
provides a better understanding of central determinants of successions within and
outside the family.
C1 [Schloemer-Laufen, Nadine] Inst Mittelstandsforsch Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
[Rauch, Andreas] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
[Rauch, Andreas] Johannes Keppler Univ Linz, Linz, Austria.
RP Schlomer-Laufen, N (corresponding author), Inst Mittelstandsforsch Bonn, Bonn,
Germany.
EM schloemer@ifm-bonn.org; andreas.rauch@sydney.edu.au
CR Ajzen I, 2011, PSYCHOL HEALTH, V26, P1113, DOI 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
AKERLOF GA, 1970, Q J ECON, V84, P488, DOI 10.2307/1879431
Astrachan J. H., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P211, DOI DOI
10.1177/08944865030160030601
Backes-Gellner U., 2001, IND FAMILIENUTERNEHM
Ballarini K., 2002, GENERATIONENWECHSEL
Barach J. A., 1988, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V26, P49
Bauer C., 2006, HESSISCHER MITTELSTA
Bellow A., 2003, PRAISE NEPOTISM NATU
Berlemann M., 2006, MITTELSTANDSBERICHT
Berrone P, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P258, DOI 10.1177/0894486511435355
Birley S., 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V26, P63
Bjuggren PO, 2002, SMALL BUS ECON, V19, P123, DOI 10.1023/A:1016289106477
Bocatto E, 2010, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V48, P497, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2010.00306.x
Boyd B, 2014, INT J FINANC STUD, V2, P335, DOI 10.3390/ijfs2040335
Brockhaus R.H., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P165, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2004.00011.X
Canavati S, 2018, J FAM BUS MANAG, V8, P235, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-05-2018-0015
Chrisman JJ, 2007, J BUS RES, V60, P1030, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.011
CHRISMAN JJ, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V38, P1103
Chua J. H. J. J., 1999, ENTREPRENEURSHIP THE, V23, P19, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879902300402
Corbetta G, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P355, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2004.00050.x
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
De Massis A, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P278, DOI 10.1177/0894486516656276
Dehlen T, 2014, J BUS VENTURING, V29, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.10.001
DeTienne DR, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P1297, DOI 10.1111/etap.12067
Deutsche Unternehmerborse, 2011, AUSW STUD UNT CHART
Doblhammer G., 2009, PROGNOSE ENTWICKLUNG
Eisend M, 2015, J MARKETING, V79, P23, DOI 10.1509/jm.14.0288
European Commission, 2003, OFFICIAL J EUROPEA L, V124, P36
Fleming Q.J., 2000, KEEP FAMILY BAGGAGE
 Frese M, 2012, FOUND TRENDS ENTREP, V8, P1, DOI 10.1561/0300000044
Freund W, 2002, JB MITTELSTANDSFORSC, P43
Freund W., 2000, FAMILIENINTERNE UNTE
Freund W., 2007, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG
Freund W., 1995, GENERATIONENWECHSEL
Freund W., 2004, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG
Garcia PRJM, 2019, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V43, P224, DOI 10.1177/1042258718796087
Getz D., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P259
Gilding M, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P299, DOI 10.1111/etap.12040
Glauben T, 2009, APPL ECON, V41, P45, DOI 10.1080/00036840601131722
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2007, ADMIN SCI QUART, V52, P106, DOI 10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Gottschalk S., 2010, GENERATIONENWECHSEL
Halter F., 2013, Z KMU ENTREPRENEURSH, V61, P35
Handler W. C., 1991, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V29, P21
Hauser H.-E., 2010, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG
Howorth C, 2004, J BUS VENTURING, V19, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.002
Hunter J.E., 2004, METHODS METAANALYSIS
Inglehart R, 2005, MODERNIZATION CULTUR
Cabrera-Suarez MK, 2012, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V23, P2736, DOI
10.1080/09585192.2012.676458
Kayser G., 2006, BDI MITTELSTANDSPANE
Kerkhoff E., 2004, GENERATIONSWECHSEL M
Kolbeck C., 2014, EINFLUSSFAKTOREN NAC, P6
Lamsfu<ss> C., 2012, GROSSTEN FAMILIENUNT
Lansberg I., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P119, DOI [10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00011-9, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x]
Lee KS, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P657
LEVINSON H, 1971, HARVARD BUS REV, V49, P90
Lipsey MW., 2001, PRACTICAL META ANAL
Lubatkin MH, 2005, J ORGAN BEHAV, V26, P313, DOI 10.1002/job.307
Mandl I., 2008, OVERVIEW FAMILY BUSI
Mas-Colell A, 1995, MICROECONOMIC THEORY, V1
Moog P., 2012, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG
Muller K., 2009, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG
Muller K., 2011, GENERATIONSWECHSEL M
Muller K., 1997, GENERATIONSWECHSEL H
Nordqvist M, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V40, P1087, DOI 10.1007/s11187-012-9466-4
Nordqvist M, 2010, ENTREP REGION DEV, V22, P211, DOI 10.1080/08985621003726119
O'Boyle EH, 2012, J BUS VENTURING, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.09.002
Pahnke A., 2019, UNTERNEHMERISCHE ZIE
Pahnke A., 2017, UNTERNEHMERISCHES VE
Parker SC, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P1241, DOI 10.1111/etap.12242
Pfohl H.C., 1997, ABGRENZUNG KLEIN MIT
Pieper TM, 2008, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V46, P372, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2008.00249.x
Porter ME, 2008, HARVARD BUS REV, V86, P78
Rauch A, 2016, J BUS VENTURING, V31, P485, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.05.005
Rauch A, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P554, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.011
Regionomica, 2000, ENDB VORSCH UNT BETR
Rosenbusch N, 2011, J BUS VENTURING, V26, P441, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
Sapienza HJ, 1996, ACAD MANAGE J, V39, P544, DOI 10.2307/256655
Schmude J., 2003, GRUNDUNG TECHNOLOGIE
Schommer M, 2019, J MANAGE STUD, V56, P270, DOI 10.1111/joms.12393
Schroder E, 2013, J VOCAT BEHAV, V83, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.07.006
Schulze WS, 2001, ORGAN SCI, V12, P99, DOI 10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P., 2000, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V13, P313, DOI [10.1111/j.1741, DOI
10.1111/J.1741]
Spelsberg H, 2012, BETRIEB FORSCH PRAX, V64, P73
Stavrou ET, 1999, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V37, P43
Steiger T, 2015, J ENTERP CULT, V23, P25, DOI 10.1142/S0218495815500028
Stiftung Familienunternehmen, 2019, VOLKSW BED FAM
Thygesen LC, 2014, EUR J EPIDEMIOL, V29, P551, DOI 10.1007/s10654-013-9873-0
Uebe-Emden N., 2011, ENTREPRENEURSHIP ED
Welter F, 2011, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V35, P165, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2010.00427.x
Westhead P., 1998, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V23, P31, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879802300102
Wieselhuber N., 1988, SITUATION ZUKUNFTSPE
Wiklund J, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P1319, DOI 10.1111/etap.12068
Wolter H.-J, 2017, BEDEUTUNG EIGENTUMER, V253
Xi J, 2015, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V11, P113, DOI 10.1007/s11365-013-0286-z
Zacher H, 2012, AGEING SOC, V32, P673, DOI 10.1017/S0144686X11000547
Zellweger T., 2015, COMING HOME BREAKING
NR 98
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 8
U2 8
PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BINGLEY
PA HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
SN 2043-6238
EI 2043-6246
J9 J FAM BUS MANAG
JI J. Fam. Bus. Manag.
DI 10.1108/JFBM-04-2020-0025
EA OCT 2020
PG 17
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA NV9PC
UT WOS:000574642800001
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Kiwia, RH
Bengesi, KMK
Ndyetabula, DW
AF Kiwia, Rose Haynes
Bengesi, Kenneth M. K.
Ndyetabula, Daniel W.
TI Succession planning and performance of family-owned small and medium
enterprises in Arusha City - Tanzania
SO JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Family business; Succession planning; SMEs performance
ID BUSINESS SUCCESSION; ANTECEDENTS; CHALLENGES; DIMENSIONS; TRENDS
AB Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine succession planning and
performance of family-owned small and medium enterprises (SMEs).
Design/methodology/approach The quantitative research approach and a cross-
sectional research design were employed. The probability sampling technique was
used to draw 219 respondents from the sampling frame. A structured questionnaire
was used for data collection. Descriptive statistics and independent samplest-tests
were used for data analysis. Findings It was revealed that most of family-owned
SMEs founders in the study area had mechanisms for succession planning for their
businesses. Also, there is a difference in business performance when successors are
selected and prepared by business founders compared to when they are selected and
prepared by other family members. Successors selected and prepared by business
founders performed better in business than successors who were selected and
prepared by other family members. Research limitations/implications This study
employed a quantitative research paradigm methodology, which limits deep discussion
with respondents. Future studies could consider using a qualitative research
paradigm methodology. Originality/value The paper presents succession planning
process experience in family-owned SMEs in the study area, specifically the
existence of succession planning in family-owned SMEs. It also shows a difference
in business performance between the two investigated groups. This paper will
benefit business founders, family business successors and researchers.
C1 [Kiwia, Rose Haynes] Sokoine Univ Agr, Dept Dev Studies, Morogoro, Tanzania.
[Bengesi, Kenneth M. K.] Sokoine Univ Agr, Dept Policy Planning & Management,
Morogoro, Tanzania.
[Ndyetabula, Daniel W.] Sokoine Univ Agr, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness,
Morogoro, Tanzania.
RP Kiwia, RH (corresponding author), Sokoine Univ Agr, Dept Dev Studies, Morogoro,
Tanzania.
EM cleo2h@yahoo.co.uk; kenneth.bengesi@suanet.ac.tz;
Ndyetabula@suanet.ac.tz
CR Adedayo O.S., 2016, ISS BUS MANAG EC, V4, P63, DOI [10.15739/IBME.16.009, DOI
10.15739/IBME.16.009]
Akpan L. P., 2017, INT J SCI RES PUBLIC, V7, P408
Aldamiz-Echevarria C., 2017, EUROPEAN J FAMILY BU, V7, P54
Ayyagari M., 2011, 5631 WORLD BANK
Barzinpour F., 2015, ADV NATURAL APPL SCI, V9, P75
Batsakis GK, 2014, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V21, P385, DOI 10.1108/JSBED-04-2014-
0062
Benavides-Velasco CA, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V40, P41, DOI 10.1007/s11187-011-
9362-3
Bengesi K.M.K., 2014, INT J BUSINESS MANAG, V9, P153
Bengesi K.M.K., 2013, THESIS
BENGESI KMK, 2014, INT J BUSINESS SOCIA, V5, P189
Benito-Hernandez S, 2014, S AFR J BUS MANAG, V45, P13
Bernard H. R, 2013, SOCIAL RES METHODS Q
Bettinelli C, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P151, DOI 10.1177/0894486511402196
Blumentritt T, 2012, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V26, P51
Bowman-Upton N.B., 1991, TRANSFERRING MANAGEM
Boyd B, 2015, J FAM BUS MANAG, V5, P17, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-05-2014-0009
Bozer G, 2017, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V24, P753, DOI 10.1108/JSBED-10-2016-0163
Buang N.A., 2013, ASIAN SOCIAL SCI, V9, P79, DOI DOI 10.5539/ASS.V9N12P79
Chaimahawong V., 2013, INT J BUSINESS MANAG, V8, p[201, 19]
Chima O.B., 2013, INT J ARTS HUMANITIE, V2, P270
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
Duh M., 2015, CASE SLOVENIA ENTREP
Erdem F., 2010, ELECT J FAMILY BUSIN, V4, P133
Evert RE, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P17, DOI 10.1177/0894486515593869
Family Firm Institute, 2017, GLOB DAT POINTS
Galbraith Q, 2012, LIBR MANAGE, V33, P221, DOI 10.1108/01435121211242272
Gandhi D., 2014, INT J BUSINESS MANAG, V2, P1
Ghee WY, 2015, ASIAN ACAD MANAG J, V20, P103
Gilding M, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P299, DOI 10.1111/etap.12040
Gomba M, 2016, INT J BUSINESS ADM, V7, P9
Goodluck C., 2015, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, P45
GUPTA P. D., 2013, J INNOVATION ENTREPR, V2, p1 , DOI DOI 10.1186/2192-5372-2-15
Hakonsson DD, 2012, LONG RANGE PLANN, V45, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.02.004
 Harms H, 2014, INT J FINANC STUD, V2, P280, DOI 10.3390/ijfs2030280
Hasan FSMA, 2016, WORLD J ENTREP MANAG, V12, P82, DOI 10.1108/WJEMSD-09-2015-
0037
Hnatek M., 2013, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, V3, P33
Hnatek M, 2015, PROCD SOC BEHV, V181, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.896
ILO, 2017, WORLD EMPL SOC OUTL
Kamener I., 2015, INT J MANAGEMENT APP, V1, P10
Cabrera-Suarez MK, 2012, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V23, P2736, DOI
10.1080/09585192.2012.676458
Kaunda S., 2013, EUROPEAN J BUSINESS, V5, P157
Kisaka E. S., 2014, RES J FINANCE ACCOUN, V5, P43
Latu IM, 2013, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V49, P444, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.003
Le Roux I, 2014, DEV SO AFR, V31, P606, DOI 10.1080/0376835X.2014.913474
Lussier RN, 2012, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V19, P7, DOI 10.1108/14626001211196370
Maalu J., 2013, INT J EDUC RES, V1, P1
Mathews T., 2013, SMALL BUSINESS EC, V45, P15
Maziku P., 2014, J EC SUSTAINABLE DEV, V5, P51
McMullen JS, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P1379, DOI 10.1111/etap.12178
Mehrabani S.E., 2011, INT J E ED E BUSINES, V1, P371
Melin L., 2014, SAGE HDB FAMILY BUSI
Musa B.M., 2014, EUROPEAN J BUSINESS, V6, P301
Mutunga F., 2013, INT J ACAD RES BUSIN, V3, P285
Nkwe, 2012, INT J HUMANITIES SOC, V17, P39
Noe R.A., 2012, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAG
Ogundele O. J. K, 2012, EUROPEAN SCI J, V8, P208
Olomi D. R., 2009, AFRICAN ENTREPRENEUR
Poza D., 2014, FAMILY BUSINESS
Poza E. J., 2013, FAMILY BUSINESS, P471
Rukundo S., 2015, DIRECT RES J SOCIAL, V2, P77
Saan R., 2018, UNIVERSAL J MANAGEME, V6, P165
Samei H, 2015, INT J ENTREP BEHAV R, V21, P731, DOI 10.1108/IJEBR-02-2015-0043
Saunders A, 2012, FRONT NEURAL CIRCUIT, V6, DOI 10.3389/fncir.2012.00047
Schroder E, 2013, J VOCAT BEHAV, V83, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.07.006
Seniwoliba A.J., 2015, RES J ED STU REV, V1, P1
Shafieyoon R., 2014, INT J ACAD RES BUSIN, V4, P327
Shaik S.B., 2013, INT J ADV RES COMPUT, V1, P28
Short JC, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P11, DOI 10.1177/0894486515622294
Tirdasari NL, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V57, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1159
URT, 2016, STAT BUS REG REP
URT, 2012, MICR MED ENT TANZ
URT, 2012, TANZ SME DEV POL
van der Merwe SP, 2012, S AFR J BUS MANAG, V43, P17, DOI 10.4102/sajbm.v43i4.479
van der Merwe SP, 2011, S AFR J BUS MANAG, V42, P31, DOI 10.4102/sajbm.v42i1.487
VOZIKIS GS, 2012, AM J EC BUSINESS ADM, V4, P94, DOI DOI
10.3844/ajebasp.2012.94.104
Wang S, 2010, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V20, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
Weismeier-Sammer D, 2014, INT J ENTREP INNOV, V15, P279, DOI
10.5367/ijei.2014.0165
Weismeier-Sammer D, 2013, INT J ENTREP INNOV, V14, P165, DOI
10.5367/ijei.2013.0119
Wilson N, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P1369, DOI 10.1111/etap.12071
Wilson SR, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.011
Yamane T., 1973, STAT INTRO ANAL, V3rd ed.
Zahrani MA, 2014, IRAN J MANAG STUD, V7, P243, DOI 10.22059/ijms.2014.36616
Zaki A., 2018, J APPL MANAGEMENT, V16, P215
Zellweger TM, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P136, DOI 10.1177/0894486511423531
NR 84
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 6
U2 6
PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BINGLEY
PA HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
SN 2043-6238
EI 2043-6246
J9 J FAM BUS MANAG
JI J. Fam. Bus. Manag.
PD SEP 7
PY 2020
VL 10
IS 3
BP 213
EP 230
DI 10.1108/JFBM-03-2019-0018
PG 18
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA NA7FQ
UT WOS:000559983100002
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Yeh, YH
Liao, CC
AF Yeh, Yin-Hua
Liao, Chen-Chieh
TI The impact of product market competition and internal corporate
governance on family succession
SO PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Succession; Corporate governance; Product market competition; Family
firms
ID FIRM PERFORMANCE; PARTY TRANSACTIONS; LARGE SHAREHOLDERS; BUSINESS
GROUPS; OWNERSHIP; EXPROPRIATION; EARNINGS
AB The paper examines the influence of product market competition and internal
corporate governance, and their interaction on family succession. Our data
comprises 382 succession events in Taiwanese listed family firms between 1997 and
2016. We find that firms operating in environments of intense product market
competition are more likely to select a non-family member as the successor (i.e.
non-family succession), as non-family successors are found to improve post-
succession firm performance. Our results also indicate that there is a stronger
likelihood that firms with controlling families who have a higher level of
ownership and higher participation in management will implement family succession;
however, this positive association is mitigated in a competitive environment. In
contrast, a higher level of related party transactions (RPTs) is associated with
more non-family succession, especially in a competitive environment. Moreover,
firms with higher RPTs, higher growth opportunities, or in competitive environments
are more likely to issue equity after non-family successions, which is consistent
with outside successors improve shareholder trust in the firm. This study also
documents that product market competition is a new external determinant of family
firms' succession decision and links its effect to internal corporate governance.
C1 [Yeh, Yin-Hua] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Grad Inst Finance, 1001 Ta Hsueh Rd,
Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan.
[Liao, Chen-Chieh] Natl Chengchi Univ, Dept Finance, 64,Sec 2,ZhiNan Rd, Taipei
11605, Taiwan.
RP Yeh, YH (corresponding author), Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Grad Inst Finance, 1001 Ta
Hsueh Rd, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan.
EM yhyeh@nctu.edu.tw
OI Liao, Chen-Chieh/0000-0002-5625-8719
FU Ministry of Science and Technology, ROC [MOST 108-2410-H-009-009-MY3]
FX We wish to thank, Prof. Ron Masulis, the Editor, and the anonymous
referee, whose comments and suggestions have significantly improved this
paper. We also thank Ash Durante for excellent copy-editing assistance.
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of
Science and Technology, ROC. (Project number: MOST
108-2410-H-009-009-MY3).
CR Almeida H, 2011, J FINANC ECON, V99, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.017
Anderson RC, 2003, J FINANC, V58, P1301, DOI 10.1111/1540-6261.00567
Anderson RC, 2009, J FINANC ECON, V92, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.04.006
Andres C, 2008, J CORP FINANC, V14, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.05.003
Ansari IF, 2014, J CORP FINANC, V28, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.006
Attig N, 2006, J BANK FINANC, V30, P2875, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.12.002
Bae KH, 2002, J FINANC, V57, P2695, DOI 10.1111/1540-6261.00510
Bebchuk L, 2009, REV FINANC STUD, V22, P783, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhn099
Bennedsen M., 2019, WHO IS BOSS FAMILY C
Bennedsen M, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P647, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
Bennedsen M, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V33, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.008
Berkman H, 2009, J BANK FINANC, V33, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.11.001
Bertrand M, 2006, J ECON PERSPECT, V20, P73, DOI 10.1257/jep.20.2.73
Board O, 2009, J IND ECON, V57, P197, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00369.x
Bohren O., 2004, GOVERNANCE PERFORMAN
Buchuk D, 2014, J FINANC ECON, V112, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.01.003
Burkart M, 2003, J FINANC, V58, P2167, DOI 10.1111/1540-6261.00601
Byun H.S., 2012, P IEEE SENSORS, P1
Carter D., 2003, FINANC REV, V38, P33, DOI DOI 10.1111/1540-6288.00034
Caselli F, 2013, ECON INQ, V51, P971, DOI 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00467.x
Cestone G, 2005, RAND J ECON, V36, P193
Chen SL, 2012, CHINA J ACCOUNT RES, V5, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.cjar.2012.11.001
Cheung YL, 2006, J FINANC ECON, V82, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.08.012
Chhaochharia V, 2017, MANAGE SCI, V63, P1405, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2409
Claessens S, 2000, J FINANC ECON, V58, P81, DOI 10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2
Claessens S, 2002, J FINANC, V57, P2741, DOI 10.1111/1540-6261.00511
Datta S, 2013, J BANK FINANC, V37, P3273, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.03.012
DIAMOND DW, 1991, J FINANC, V46, P1325, DOI 10.2307/2328861
Durnev A, 2020, J ACCOUNT ECON, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101299
Edlin AS, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P1301
Erhardt NL, 2003, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V11, P102, DOI 10.1111/1467-8683.00011
Fan JPH, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V134, P509, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2382-6
Fan JPH, 2002, J ACCOUNT ECON, V33, P401, DOI 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00047-2
Fiordelisi F, 2014, J CORP FINANC, V28, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.009
GALOR E, 1985, ECONOMETRICA, V53, P329, DOI 10.2307/1911239
GERTNER R, 1988, RAND J ECON, V19, P173, DOI 10.2307/2555698
Giroud X, 2011, J FINANC, V66, P563, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01642.x
Giroud X, 2010, J FINANC ECON, V95, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.10.008
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2007, ADMIN SCI QUART, V52, P106, DOI 10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Gompers P, 2003, Q J ECON, V118, P107, DOI 10.1162/00335530360535162
Guadalupe M., 2010, COMPETITION PRIVATE
HART OD, 1983, BELL J ECON, V14, P366, DOI 10.2307/3003639
Huang HH, 2013, J BANK FINANC, V37, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.001
JAGANNATHAN R, 1999, N AM J ECON FINANC, V10, P387
Jiang FX, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V35, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.09.004
Karuna C., 2010, IND PRODUCT MARKET C
Karuna C, 2007, J ACCOUNT ECON, V43, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.02.004
Ko H.C.A., 2016, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V40, P491
 La Porta R, 2002, J FINANC, V57, P1147, DOI 10.1111/1540-6261.00457
La Porta R, 1999, J FINANC, V54, P471, DOI 10.1111/0022-1082.00115
Leventis S., 2011, BRIT ACCOUNT REV, V43, P112, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.BAR.2011.02.005
Li X, 2010, REV ACCOUNT STUD, V15, P663, DOI 10.1007/s11142-010-9129-0
Lins KV, 2003, J FINANC QUANT ANAL, V38, P159, DOI 10.2307/4126768
Lo AWY, 2010, J CORP FINANC, V16, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.11.002
Masulis RW, 2011, REV FINANC STUD, V24, P3556, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhr052
Mullins W, 2016, J FINANC ECON, V119, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.08.011
Nickell SJ, 1996, J POLIT ECON, V104, P724, DOI 10.1086/262040
Peltzman S, 2014, J LAW ECON, V57, pS101, DOI 10.1086/675719
Perez-Gonzalez F, 2006, AM ECON REV, V96, P1559, DOI 10.1257/aer.96.5.1559
Schmidt KM, 1997, REV ECON STUD, V64, P191, DOI 10.2307/2971709
SHLEIFER A, 1986, J POLIT ECON, V94, P461, DOI 10.1086/261385
Shleifer A, 1997, J FINANC, V52, P737, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Spiegel M, 2013, J FINANC, V68, P125, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01796.x
Sraer D, 2007, J EUR ECON ASSOC, V5, P709, DOI 10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.4.709
STIGLER GJ, 1958, J LAW ECON, V1, P54, DOI 10.1086/466541
Stivers Andrew E., 2004, TOPICS THEORETICAL E, V4, P1
Tian GY, 2011, J CORP FINANC, V17, P403, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.12.004
Tirole J, 2006, THEORY OF CORPORATE FINANCE, P1
Tirole J., 1988, THEORY IND ORG
VERRECCHIA RE, 1983, J ACCOUNT ECON, V5, P179, DOI 10.1016/0165-4101(83)90011-3
Verrecchia RE, 2006, J ACCOUNTING RES, V44, P791, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-
679X.2006.00216.x
Villalonga B, 2006, J FINANC ECON, V80, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
Xu NH, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V33, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.004
Yeh YH, 2019, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.09.011
Yeh YH, 2012, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V20, P755, DOI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2012.02.003
NR 75
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0927-538X
EI 1879-0585
J9 PAC-BASIN FINANC J
JI Pac.-Basin Financ. J.
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 62
AR 101346
DI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101346
PG 22
WC Business, Finance
SC Business & Economics
GA NX0GO
UT WOS:000575397700002
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Foguesatto, CR
Mores, GD
Kruger, SD
Costa, C
AF Foguesatto, Cristian Rogerio
Mores, Giana de Vargas
Kruger, Silvana Dalmutt
Costa, Carlos
TI Will I have a potential successor? Factors influencing family farming
succession in Brazil
SO LAND USE POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Rural development; Rural exodus; Smallholder; Young people; Logistic
model
ID AGRICULTURE; GENERATION; ADOPTION; FARMERS; YOUTH
AB As the predominant form of land use worldwide, family farming is important in
meeting the global challenge of food security. The present research sought to
identify the factors influencing the process of family farming succession. In an
effort to do so, we analyzed 150 responses to a farmer survey conducted in a region
suffering a lack of younger successors. The analysis, based on descriptive
statistics and logistic regression models, highlighted the importance of income as
a factor encouraging succession. Logistic regression models showed that the number
of family members employed, the farm size, the farm's annual income, and incentives
for succession are main factors that influence expectation of a successor in the
family farming succession process. The identification of these factors provided
important insights for the development of interventions policies to encourage
successors to take over family farms.
C1 [Foguesatto, Cristian Rogerio] Fed Univ Rio Grande Sul UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS,
Brazil.
[Mores, Giana de Vargas] IMED Business Sch, 304 Senador Pinheiro St, Passo
Fundo, RS, Brazil.
[Kruger, Silvana Dalmutt] Community Univ Chapeco Reg Unochapeco, Chapeco, SC,
Brazil.
[Costa, Carlos] IMED Business Sch, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
RP Mores, GD (corresponding author), IMED Business Sch, 304 Senador Pinheiro St,
Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
EM cristian17agro@gmail.com; gimores@gmail.com; silvanak@unochapeco.edu.br;
carlos.costa@imed.edu.br
OI Costa, Carlos/0000-0003-0402-3763; de Vargas Mores,
Giana/0000-0003-3733-2220
FU Fundacao Meridional, Passo Fundo, Brazil
FX Fundacao Meridional, Passo Fundo, Brazil.
CR Aldanondo Ochoa AM, 2007, SPAN J AGRIC RES, V5, P214, DOI 10.5424/sjar/2007052-
241
Artuzo FD, 2018, RBGN-REV BRAS GEST N, V20, P273, DOI 10.7819/rbgn.v20i2.3192
Batista J.D.A., 2015, REV EMPREENDEDORISMO, V4, P62
Bednarikova Z, 2016, J RURAL STUD, V45, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.006
Belmonte V.A.B., 2013, REV ADM UFSM, V6, P71
Bertoni D, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V57, P739, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.002
Bjarnason T, 2006, J RURAL STUD, V22, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.09.004
Bjorkhaug H., 2010, CHALLENGES SUCCESSIO
Cabral L, 2016, WORLD DEV, V81, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.010
Cavicchioli D, 2015, MT RES DEV, V35, P152, DOI 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00107.1
Chiswell HM, 2018, SOCIOL RURALIS, V58, P104, DOI 10.1111/soru.12138
Chiswell HM, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P300, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12131
Foguesatto CR, 2016, REV PARANAENSE DESEN, V37, P15
GASSON R, 1988, J AGR ECON, V39, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1988.tb00560.x
IBGE, 2010, CENS 2010
Kassie M, 2009, NAT RESOUR FORUM, V33, P189, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-
8947.2009.01224.x
Kerbler B, 2012, AGR ECON-CZECH, V58, P285, DOI 10.17221/47/2011-AGRICECON
 Kischener M.A., 2015, MUNDO AGR, V16, P01
Kruger S. D., 2018, Extensao Rural, V25, P57
Leonard B, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V61, P147, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.006
Lobley M, 2010, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V1, P49, DOI 10.5304/jafscd.2010.011.009
Matte A, 2016, REV ESTUD SOCIAIS, V18, P130
May D, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V82, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.019
Mishra AK, 2010, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V35, P133
Morais M., 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V71, P445
Moreira R, 2015, BMC GENOMICS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1817-5
Panno F., 2014, DESENVOLV QUESTAO, V12, P264
Pessotto AP, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104045
Ramos G, 2005, J COMP FAM STUD, V36, P367, DOI 10.3138/jcfs.36.3.367
Simionatto FJ, 2018, CUST AGRONEGOCIO, V14, P260
Suess-Reyes J, 2016, J RURAL STUD, V47, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.008
Tey YS, 2012, PRECIS AGRIC, V13, P713, DOI 10.1007/s11119-012-9273-6
Tolotti C.M.F., 2018, VIVENCIAS, V14, P97
United Nations, 2018, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL
Weiss C. R., 2004, REV ECON HOUSEHOLD, V2, P443, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11150-004-
5656-4
ZANIN A., 2014, REV CATARINENSE CIEN, V13, P9
Zou BL, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V77, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.001
NR 37
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-8377
EI 1873-5754
J9 LAND USE POLICY
JI Land Use Pol.
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 97
AR 104643
DI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104643
PG 6
WC Environmental Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA MY9NR
UT WOS:000558748500016
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU McAdam, M
Brophy, M
Harrison, RT
AF McAdam, Maura
Brophy, Martina
Harrison, Richard T.
TI Anointed or appointed? Father-daughter succession within the family
business
SO INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL-RESEARCHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE family business; gender; identity work; succession; successor identity
ID IDENTITY WORK; ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY; MANAGEMENT TRANSFER; LEADERSHIP;
GENDER; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; CONSTRUCTION; WOMEN; FIRMS; PERSPECTIVE
AB With the focus on events and outcomes shaping most of the existing family
business research on intra-family succession, the subtleties of the incumbent-
successor relationship and the dynamic nature of succession as a process of
becoming is somewhat neglected. In particular, we have limited understanding of how
successor identities are constructed as legitimate between incumbent and successor
during father-daughter succession. This article addresses this gap in understanding
by exploring how the daughter successor engages in identity work with the father
incumbent during the process of succession and the role of father-daughter gendered
relations in shaping her successor identity. Using a two-stage research design
strategy, we draw upon empirical evidence derived from 14 individual and joint
semi-structured interviews to present a narrative analysis of five father-daughter
dyads. In so doing, we unveil how the daughter's successor identity was co-
constructed as legitimate and how father-daughter gendered relations influenced
this process. Although daughters rely on certain father-daughter relations
(preparation, endorsement and osmotic credibility) for legitimacy, they also need
to develop independently of their father to heighten their own visibility and
establish credibility.
C1 [McAdam, Maura] Dublin City Univ, Management, Dublin, Ireland.
[McAdam, Maura] Dublin City Univ, Entrepreneurship, Dublin, Ireland.
[Brophy, Martina] Dublin City Univ, DCU Natl Ctr Family Business, Dublin,
Ireland.
[Harrison, Richard T.] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Business, Entrepreneurship & Innovat,
Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland.
[Harrison, Richard T.] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Business, Compassionate Leadership
Initiat, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland.
RP McAdam, M (corresponding author), Dublin City Univ, DCU Business Sch, Dublin 9,
Ireland.
EM maura.mcadam@dcu.ie
OI McAdam, Maura/0000-0003-2203-5485
CR Ahl H, 2012, ORGANIZATION, V19, P543, DOI 10.1177/1350508412448695
Ahrens JP, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.02.002
Albert S., 1985, RES ORG BEHAV, V7, P263, DOI DOI 10.1057/CRR.2008.31
Ashforth BE, 2016, ANNU REV ORGAN PSYCH, V3, P111, DOI 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-
041015-062322
Aygoren H, 2015, EUR J INT MANAG, V9, P160, DOI 10.1504/EJIM.2015.067857
Bertaux Daniel., 1981, BIOGRAPHY SOC LIFE H
Brown AD, 2017, INT J MANAG REV, V19, P296, DOI 10.1111/ijmr.12152
Byrne B, 2014, PALGR POLIT IDENT, P138
Byrne J, 2018, EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT, V16, P1
Byrne J, 2021, ORGAN STUD, V42, P129, DOI 10.1177/0170840619879184
Calabro A, 2018, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V39, P2014, DOI 10.1002/smj.2760
Cater III JJ, 2019, PALGRAVE HDB HETEROG, P229
Cater JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P301, DOI 10.1177/0894486516656255
Cesaroni FM, 2014, HIST FAM, V19, P358, DOI 10.1080/1081602X.2014.929019
Chase S. E., 2005, SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE, P651
Chase SE, 2017, SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE, P946
Chrisman J. J., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V11, P19, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1998.00019.X]
Cole Patricia M., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P353, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1997.00353.X
Constantinidis C., 2009, INT MANAG, V14, P43
Crouch M, 2006, SOC SCI INFORM, V45, P483, DOI 10.1177/0539018406069584
CSO Ireland, 2016, WOM MEN IR 2016
Curimbaba F., 2002, FAM BUS REV, V15, P239
Czarniawska B., 1998, QUALITATIVE RES METH, V43
 Dalpiaz E, 2014, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V38, P1375, DOI 10.1111/etap.12129
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
Davis J. A., 1989, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V2, P47, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1989.00047.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1989.00047.X]
Davis P. S., 1999, FAM BUS REV, V12, P311, DOI [10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9,
DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1999.00311.X, 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00311.x.]
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
DeRue DS, 2010, ACAD MANAGE REV, V35, P627, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2010.53503267
Deutsch FM, 2007, GENDER SOC, V21, P106, DOI 10.1177/0891243206293577
Dumas C., 1990, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V3, P169, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1990.00169.X
Dumas C., 1989, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V2, P31, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1989.00031.X
Dumas C., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V11, P219, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1998.00219.X
Dumas C., 1992, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V16, P41, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879201600403
Eagly AH, 2001, J SOC ISSUES, V57, P781, DOI 10.1111/0022-4537.00241
Fletcher D, 2016, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V7, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001
Foucault M., 1980, POWER KNOWLEDGE SELE
Garcia-Alvarez E., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P189, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00189.X
Garud R, 2014, ORGAN SCI, V25, P1479, DOI 10.1287/orsc.2014.0915
Garud R, 2013, ACAD MANAGE REV, V38, P157, DOI 10.5465/amr.2012.0055
Gherardi S, 2016, INT J GEND ENTREP, V8, P28, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-11-2014-0044
Gioia DA, 2000, ACAD MANAGE REV, V25, P63, DOI 10.2307/259263
Haberman H, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P163, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00088.x
Hamilton E, 2013, ENTREPRENEURSHIP GEN
Hamilton E, 2017, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V8, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.11.001
HANDLER W. C., 1994, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V7, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00133.X
Harrison RT, 2016, RTLDG RETHINK ENTREP, P110
Harrison RT, 2019, PALGRAVE HDB HETEROG, P673
Hatch MJ, 2002, HUM RELAT, V55, P989, DOI 10.1177/0018726702055008181
Hill FM, 2006, VENTUR CAP, V8, P159, DOI 10.1080/13691060600555347
Hjorth D., 2004, NARRATIVE DISCURSIVE
Howorth C, 2010, INT SMALL BUS J, V28, P437, DOI 10.1177/0266242610373685
Hytti U, 2017, INT SMALL BUS J, V35, P665, DOI 10.1177/0266242616675924
Ibarra H, 1999, ADMIN SCI QUART, V44, P764, DOI 10.2307/2667055
Ibarra H, 2010, ACAD MANAGE REV, V35, P135, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2010.45577925
Jenkins R, 2008, KEY IDEAS, P1
Kelan EK, 2010, GENDER WORK ORGAN, V17, P174, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
0432.2009.00459.x
Knapp JR, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P333, DOI 10.1177/0894486512474036
Koro-Ljungberg M.A., 2008, HDB CONSTRUCTIONIST, P429
KUZEL AJ, 1992, RES METH PR, V3, P31
Lam W, 2011, INT SMALL BUS J, V29, P508, DOI 10.1177/0266242610376357
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Lefebvre MR, 2016, FUTURES, V75, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2015.10.010
Leitch CM, 2016, ENTREP REGION DEV, V28, P177, DOI 10.1080/08985626.2016.1155740
Lewis KV, 2015, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V53, P662, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12175
Lounsbury M, 2001, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V22, P545, DOI 10.1002/smj.188
Marlow S, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P791, DOI 10.1111/etap.12062
McAdam M, 2013, INT J ENTREP INNOV, V14, P151, DOI 10.5367/ijei.2013.0120
MILES MB, 1979, ADMIN SCI QUART, V24, P590, DOI 10.2307/2392365
Miller SP, 2014, FRONT PSYCHOL, V5, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01335
Morris SM, 2001, QUAL HEALTH RES, V11, P553, DOI 10.1177/104973201129119208
Mussolino D, 2019, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V10, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.01.003
Mussolino D, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.09.003
 Naldi L, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P33, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00082.x
Nelson T, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1177/0894486517715390
Nordqvist M., 2010, ENTREP REGION DEV, V22, P211
Oseen C, 1997, GENDER WORK ORGAN, V4, P170
Overbeke KK, 2015, FRONT PSYCHOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00625
Overbeke KK, 2013, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V4, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.07.002
Polkinghorne DE., 1995, INT J QUAL STUD ED, V8, P5, DOI DOI
10.1080/0951839950080103
Pratt MG, 2009, ACAD MANAGE J, V52, P856, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2009.44632557
Ramarajan L, 2014, ACAD MANAG ANN, V8, P589, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2014.912379
Randerson K, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.002
Salvato C, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P235, DOI 10.1177/0894486513490796
Sardeshmukh SR, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P111, DOI 10.1177/0894486510391783
Schlepphorst S, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P358, DOI
10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.08.004
Schultz M, 2013, ORGAN SCI, V24, P1, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0731
Sharma P, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P667, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00015-6
Sharma P., 2000, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V13, P313, DOI [10.1111/j.1741, DOI
10.1111/J.1741]
Smythe J, 2013, SMALL ENTERP RES, V20, P98, DOI 10.5172/ser.2013.20.2.98
SOMERS MR, 1994, THEOR SOC, V23, P605, DOI 10.1007/BF00992905
Sprague J., 2016, FEMINIST METHODOLOGI
Stead V, 2017, INT SMALL BUS J, V35, P61, DOI 10.1177/0266242615594413
Swail J, 2018, ENTREP REGION DEV, V30, P256, DOI 10.1080/08985626.2017.1406539
Thompson B, 2009, NARRAT INQ, V19, P106, DOI 10.1075/ni.19.1.07tho
Uhlaner LM, 2012, SMALL BUS ECON, V38, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11187-010-9263-x
Venter E, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P283, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00049.x
Vera CF, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00051.x
Wang C, 2010, J FAM ECON ISS, V31, P475, DOI 10.1007/s10834-010-9230-3
Ward JL., 1997, FAM BUS REV, V10, P323, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00323.x,
DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1997.00323.X]
Watson TJ, 2001, MANAGE LEARN, V32, P221, DOI 10.1177/1350507601322004
Watson TJ, 2008, ORGANIZATION, V15, P121, DOI 10.1177/1350508407084488
Watson TJ, 2009, INT SMALL BUS J, V27, P251, DOI 10.1177/0266242609102274
Westhead P., 1998, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V23, P31, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879802300102
Wielsma AJ, 2019, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V10, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.01.006
NR 105
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 7
U2 7
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0266-2426
EI 1741-2870
J9 INT SMALL BUS J
JI Int. Small Bus. J.-Res. Entrep.
AR 0266242620948349
DI 10.1177/0266242620948349
EA AUG 2020
PG 25
WC Business; Management
SC Business & Economics
GA NC2ZD
UT WOS:000561083700001
OA Green Published, Green Accepted, Bronze
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Mihaylov, G
Zurbruegg, R
AF Mihaylov, George
Zurbruegg, Ralf
TI The relationship between financial risk management and succession
planning in family businesses
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Risk management; Financial performance; Succession planning; Family
businesses
ID FIRMS; PERFORMANCE; OWNERSHIP; ADOPTION; FARM
AB Purpose This article examines the relationship between financial risk management
and succession planning in family businesses. Motivated by the Theory of Planned
Behaviour, we hypothesize that the use of professional risk management practices is
associated with an increased likelihood that businesses adopt professionalized
approaches to succession planning. We then investigate if succession planning
professionalization is, in turn, positively related to the financial performance of
family businesses. Design/methodology/approach We apply binary probit and ordered
dependent variable regressions to unique data generated from a survey sample of
Australian family businesses. To check the robustness of our results to potential
endogeneity concerns we apply difference tests to propensity score matched sub-
samples from our original cohort of respondents. Findings The results show that, in
contrast to verbal or absent succession arrangements, formal written succession
plans are both positively associated with the use of financial risk management
practices and with superior financial performance in family businesses.
Originality/value Our arguments and findings suggest that active financial risk
management provides a platform for planning succession in family businesses, and
that this links with improved short-term financial performance. In light of the
critical role that succession plays in ensuring long-term business sustainability,
our findings provide important and novel insights into the conditions under which
family businesses are most likely to use formal professionalized succession
planning.
C1 [Mihaylov, George; Zurbruegg, Ralf] Univ Adelaide, Business Sch, Adelaide, SA,
Australia.
RP Mihaylov, G (corresponding author), Univ Adelaide, Business Sch, Adelaide, SA,
Australia.
EM george.mihaylov@adelaide.edu.au
FU Australian Research CouncilAustralian Research Council [LP0990421]; ANZ,
Rural Bank; RFCS
FX The authors wish to thank the Australian Research Council [grant number
LP0990421], ANZ, Rural Bank, and the RFCS for financial and operational
support enabling this research. We are also grateful to the editor,
Alfred Yawson, and to Jean Canil, Chris Graves, and an anonymous referee
for their helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this
article. Andrew Harrison provided excellent research assistance.
CR AJZEN I, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V50, P179, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Astrachan JH, 2010, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V1, P6, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.JFBS.2010.02.001
Beuren IM, 2016, INT J MANAG FINANC, V12, P654, DOI 10.1108/IJMF-09-2014-0151
Blumentritt T, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P51, DOI 10.1177/0894486512447811
Borges J. A. R., 2012, INT J RES BUSINESS, V2, P27
Chua J. H. J. J., 1999, ENTREPRENEURSHIP THE, V23, P19, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879902300402
Craig J., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P59
Delmas MA, 2014, FAM BUS REV, V27, P228, DOI 10.1177/0894486514538651
 Feldman ER, 2019, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V40, P757, DOI 10.1002/smj.2999
Graves C, 2014, FAM BUS REV, V27, P142, DOI 10.1177/0894486513491588
Greiner R, 2009, AGR SYST, V99, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.10.003
Ip B, 2006, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V13, P326, DOI 10.1108/14626000610680235
Koropp C, 2014, FAM BUS REV, V27, P307, DOI 10.1177/0894486514522483
MALONE SC, 1989, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V2, P341, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1989.tb00003.x
Mishra AK, 2010, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V35, P133
Molly V, 2010, FAM BUS REV, V23, P131, DOI 10.1177/0894486510365062
Morgan SL, 2006, SOCIOL METHOD RES, V35, P3, DOI 10.1177/0049124106289164
Moschini G., 2001, HDB AGR EC, P87, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1574-0072(01)10005-8,
10.1016/S1574-0072(01)10005-8]
Motwani J, 2006, INT SMALL BUS J, V24, P471, DOI 10.1177/0266242606067270
Pukthuanthong K, 2013, INT J MANAG FINANC, V9, P13, DOI
10.1108/17439131311298511
ROSENBAUM PR, 1983, BIOMETRIKA, V70, P41, DOI 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
Sappey R, 2012, AUSTRALAS ACCOUNT BU, V6, P94
Sharma P., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00001.X
Stuart A., 2012, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V25, P58
van Winsen F, 2016, J RISK RES, V19, P56, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2014.940597
Wang Y., 2004, INT J ENTREPRENEURIA, V10, P59, DOI DOI 10.1108/13552550410521380
Wheeler S, 2012, J RURAL STUD, V28, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.04.001
Wiener-Fererhofer A, 2017, J FAM BUS MANAG, V7, P256, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-06-2017-
0013
NR 28
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BINGLEY
PA HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
SN 1743-9132
EI 1758-6569
J9 INT J MANAG FINANC
JI Int. J. Manag. Financ.
DI 10.1108/IJMF-12-2019-0466
EA JUL 2020
PG 17
WC Business, Finance
SC Business & Economics
GA MW4YM
UT WOS:000557044300001
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Jimenez, SO
Amaya, AMB
Osuna, BAL
AF Jimenez, Sergio Ochoa
Bugarin Amaya, Ana Melissa
Leyva Osuna, Beatriz Alicia
TI Gender and Succession in Family Smes in Northern Mexico
SO REICE-REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION EN CIENCIAS ECONOMICAS
LA Spanish
DT Article
DE Family; succession; man; woman; leadership
AB In order to identify the gender perspective during the succession process in
Small and Medium-sized (SMEs) Family-owned Enterprises, a questionnaire was applied
to 52 informants from tourism organizations. The most relevant findings demonstrate
that management positions are predominantly occupied by men, preferably if they are
married and without the degree of study being a determining factor. Attributes such
as age, kinship and experience in functional areas are considered when choosing a
successor by both men and women. Although for the informants, gender does not
represent an essential factor for succession, the results show the opposite.
C1 [Jimenez, Sergio Ochoa; Bugarin Amaya, Ana Melissa; Leyva Osuna, Beatriz Alicia]
Inst Tecnol Sonora, Obregon, Mexico.
RP Jimenez, SO (corresponding author), Inst Tecnol Sonora, Obregon, Mexico.
EM serdio.ochoa@itson.edu.mx; melissa_bugarin@hotmail.com;
beatriz.leyva@itson.edu.mx
RI JIMENEZ, SERGIO OCHOA/ABD-2868-2020
OI JIMENEZ, SERGIO OCHOA/0000-0003-1848-3760
CR Araya A., 2012, TEC EMPRESARIAL, V6
Araya A., 2010, TEC EMPRESARIAL, V6, P29
Arenas Cardona Henry Antonio, 2014, estud.gerenc., V30, P252
Balladares J, 2016, THESIS
Barbeito S., 2011, B EC ICE, P45
Barbeito S., 2006, REV GALLEGA EC, V15, P1
Barugel E. A., 2005, SERIE DOCUMENTOS TRA
Basco R., 2016, J BUSINESS EC
Rodriguez MB, 2011, FINLAY, V1, P17
Biosca D., 2003, EMPRESA FAMILIA PROB
Camarena M. E., 2017, REV ESTUDIO GENERO V, VV, P1
Carrasco A., 2007, REV EMPRESA, P20
Carvalho I, 2019, ANN TOURISM RES, V75, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2018.12.022
Ceja L., 2008, NEWSLETTER, P1
Chadwick IC, 2018, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V9, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.10.002
Cisneros L, 2011, AD-MINIST, P49
Comision Asesores de Empresas Familiares, 2014, B COM DES AS EMPR FA
Comision Nacional para el Uso Eficiente de la Energia, 2016, PEQ MED EMPR
Cuadrado I., 2007, REV PSICOLOGIA TRABA, V23, P183
Dreher GE, 2003, HUM RELAT, V56, P541, DOI 10.1177/0018726703056005002
Echaiz Moreno Daniel, 2010, Bol. Mex. Der. Comp., V43, P101
Galve C., 2002, EKONOMIAZ, V20, P159
Garzino L., 2016, ROL MUJER EMPRESAS F
Gascon V, 2015, REFORMA
Goni J., 2014, NUEVO CONCEPTO EMPRE
Goyzueía Rivera Samuel Israel, 2013, Perspectivas, V0, P87
Serna MG, 2012, ECON SOC TERRIT, V12, P43
GUIL A., 2008, ECCOS REV CIENTIFICA, V10, P213
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia, 2014, CENS EC 2014
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia, 2018, DIR EST NAC UN EC
Irigoyen H., 1997, PYMES EC ORG
Lobato F., 2004, INVESTIGACION COMERC
Lopez V. M., 2011, CUADERNOS ADM, V24, P253
Losada A, 2015, FAMILIA PSICOLOGIA
Marcos M., 2015, THESIS
Martinez, 2009, 1 C U AND INV GEN LL
Mendoza R., 2015, REV ESTUDIOS INTERDI, V8, P24
Monso L., 2005, REDVET REV ELECT VET, VVI, P1
Montalvo D., 2013, THESIS
Mucci O, 2008, EMPRESAS FAMILIARES
Navarro A., 2008, REV DIFUSION CIENTIF, V3, P10
Neiman M., 2017, PAPERS REV PSICOLOGI, V102
Pascual C., 2012, THESIS
Perez AI., 2012, INVESTIGACION PENSAM, P7
 PRIETO C, 2013, REV ESPANOLA INVESTI, V141, P113, DOI DOI
10.5477/CIS/REIS.141.113
Ragins B. R., 1998, ACAD MANAGEMENT EXEC, V12, P28, DOI
[10.5465/ame.1998.254976, DOI 10.5465/AME.1998.254976]
Saiz L, 2014, EXPANSION
Salomon J., 2010, THESIS
Samara G, 2019, BUS HORIZONS, V62, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.09.001
SANCHEZ M, 2017, ESPACIOS, V38, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10765-017-2182-1
Soto A., 2011, CONTADURIA ADM, V58
Soto E., 2004, PYMES ANTE RETO SIGL
Flores MT, 2011, ESTUD FRONT, V12, P95
Torres G., 2011, THESIS
Trevinyo-Rodriguez R., 2010, EMPRESAS FAMILIARES
Vallejo M, 2007, INVESTIGACIONES EURO, V13, P217
Vilches A., 2016, IGUALDAD GENERO
Viqueira V., 2016, APLICACION CONCEPTOS
NR 58
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU UNIV NACL AUTONOMA NICARAGUA
PI MANAGUA
PA UNIV NACL AUTONOMA NICARAGUA, MANAGUA, 00000, NICARAGUA
SN 2308-782X
J9 REICE-REV ELECTRON I
JI REICE-Rev. Electron. Investig. Cienc. Econ.
PD JUL-DEC
PY 2020
VL 8
IS 16
BP 1
EP 23
DI 10.5377/reice.v8i16.10657
PG 23
WC Economics
SC Business & Economics
GA PU3ZZ
UT WOS:000609246500001
OA Other Gold
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Porfirio, JA
Felicio, JA
Carrilho, T
AF Porfirio, Jose Antonio
Felicio, Jose Augusto
Carrilho, Tiago
TI Family business succession: Analysis of the drivers of success based on
entrepreneurship theory
SO JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Family business; Succession; Successors' motivation; Opportunity
succession; Necessity succession; Entrepreneurship
ID PERFORMANCE; FIRM; PERSPECTIVE
AB This study explores family business succession. In this study, succession is
compared to the concept of opportunity versus necessity entrepreneurship. The
motivations of successors when they enter the succession process are examined to
identify different conditions for family business success and sustainability. The
influence of context is also considered. This study is based on multilevel research
and a multidisciplinary perspective. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
(fsQCA) is applied to a sample of 383 observations from 6 countries (Portugal,
Italy, Greece, Cyprus, North Macedonia, and Bulgaria) spanning 2 regions: southern
European Mediterranean countries (Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Cyprus) and southern
Slavic countries (North Macedonia and Bulgaria). The interplay between personal
characteristics of the successor, organizational characteristics of the family
business, and context produces different patterns that lead to different outcomes
in the succession processes of family businesses. The results are important to
strengthen family business theory and identify the conditions that best promote the
future growth and sustainability of family businesses. The results are also
important to promote country-specific public policies that may create better
conditions for successors in family businesses to succeed.
C1 [Porfirio, Jose Antonio; Carrilho, Tiago] Univ Aberta, Lisbon, Portugal.
[Felicio, Jose Augusto] ISEG Lisbon Sch Econ & Management, Lisbon, Portugal.
RP Porfirio, JA (corresponding author), Social Sci & Management Dept, R Escola
Politecn 147, P-1269001 Lisbon, Portugal.
EM Jose.Porfirio@uab.pt; jaufeli@netcabo.pt; Tiago.Mendes@uab.pt
RI Hadri, Valdet/AAE-5457-2021; Porfirio, Jose A/D-5527-2015
OI Porfirio, Jose A/0000-0001-9551-9531
CR Amit R, 1995, J SMALL BUSINESS ENT, V12, P64, DOI DOI
10.1080/08276331.1995.10600505
Porfirio JA, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P5117, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.090
Aragon-Mendoza J, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P4941, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.056
BECKHARD R, 1983, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V24, P59
Benavides-Velasco CA, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V40, P41, DOI 10.1007/s11187-011-
9362-3
Berger Brigitte, 1991, CULTURE ENTREPRENEUR
Bettinelli C, 2014, FOUND TRENDS ENTREP, V10, P161, DOI 10.1561/0300000049
Beynon M, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P5401, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.145
Bird B., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P337, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00337.X
Bocatto E, 2010, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V48, P497, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2010.00306.x
Carsrud A, 2011, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V49, P9, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2010.00312.x
Chrisman JJ, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P467, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00055-7
Christensen CR, 1953, MANAGEMENT SUCCESSIO
Chua J. H. J. J., 1999, ENTREPRENEURSHIP THE, V23, P19, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879902300402
Cohn E., 1990, EC ED
Danes SM, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P199, DOI 10.1177/0894486509333424
Botella-Carrubi MD, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11071873
Dyck B, 2002, J BUS VENTURING, V17, P143, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00056-2
DYER W.G., 1994, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V19, P71, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879401900105
Fairlie RW, 2009, SMALL BUS ECON, V33, P375, DOI 10.1007/s11187-009-9207-5
Fiss PC, 2011, ACAD MANAGE J, V54, P393, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263120
GEM, 2019, GLOB ENTR MON 2018 2
Goldberg S.D., 1996, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V9, P185, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1996.00185.X
Handler W. C., 1992, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V5, P282
Huarng KH, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P5187, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.110
Lansberg I. S., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P119
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Light I., 2001, DAN BUILD URB RES EU
 Lumpkin GT, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P127, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00120.x
Mokhber M, 2017, J MANAG DEV, V36, P330, DOI 10.1108/JMD-12-2015-0171
Morris MH, 1997, J BUS VENTURING, V12, P385, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00010-4
Murphy L, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.10.003
Nordqvist M, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V40, P1087, DOI 10.1007/s11187-012-9466-4
Nordqvist M, 2010, ENTREP REGION DEV, V22, P211, DOI 10.1080/08985621003726119
Pejic Bach M, 2018, ECON RES-EKON ISTRAZ, V31, P1453, DOI
10.1080/1331677X.2018.1478321
Porfirio J, 2018, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V14, P329, DOI 10.1007/s11365-018-0501-z
Pyromalis Vassilios D., 2009, International Entrepreneurship and Management
Journal, V5, P439, DOI 10.1007/s11365-009-0118-3
Randerson K., 2015, FAMILY ENTREPRENEURS
Belda PR, 2018, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V14, P249, DOI 10.1007/s11365-018-0504-9
Roig-Tierno N, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P1261, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.089
ROWE BR, 1993, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V6, P383
Schneider C.Q, 2012, SET THEORETIC METHOD
Shapero A., 1982, ENCY ENTREPRENEURSHI, P72
Sharma P, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P667, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00015-6
Sharma P, 2008, FAMILY VALUES VALUE, P71
Stamm Isabell, 2011, J FAMILY BUSINESS ST, V2, P117, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.JFBS.2011.07.002
Steyaert C, 2007, ENTREP REGION DEV, V19, P453, DOI 10.1080/08985620701671759
Tatoglu E, 2008, INT SMALL BUS J, V26, P155, DOI 10.1177/0266242607086572
Thornton PH, 2011, INT SMALL BUS J, V29, P105, DOI 10.1177/0266242610391930
TROW DB, 1961, ADMIN SCI QUART, V6, P228, DOI 10.2307/2390756
Uhlaner LM, 2012, SMALL BUS ECON, V38, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11187-010-9263-x
Ward JL, 2011, KEEPING FAMILY BUSIN
Welsh D. H., 2019, INT ENTREPRENEURSHIP, V15, P1
Woodside AG, 2013, J BUS RES, V66, P463, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
Zanger C., 2014, RENC ST GALL SEPT
Zellweger T, 2012, SMALL BUS ECON, V38, P67, DOI 10.1007/s11187-010-9267-6
NR 56
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 9
U2 28
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0148-2963
EI 1873-7978
J9 J BUS RES
JI J. Bus. Res.
PD JUL
PY 2020
VL 115
BP 250
EP 257
DI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.054
PG 8
WC Business
SC Business & Economics
GA LR8WB
UT WOS:000535976300022
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Lenz, R
 Schormuller, C
Gluckler, J
AF Lenz, Regina
Schormueller, Claudia
Glueckler, Johannes
TI Legitimation strategies in an emerging field: family firm succession
consultancy in Germany
SO ZEITSCHRIFT FUR WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGRAPHIE
LA English
DT Article
DE Bavaria; consulting; family firms; legitimacy; organizational field;
succession; Upper Palatinate
ID ADVISERS; TRUST; PERFORMANCE; EXPERIENCE; LEADERSHIP
AB Finding a successor has become a severe challenge for family firms in Germany.
As family firms are disproportionately concentrated in rural economies, succession
has also become a considerable threat for peripheral regions and their labor
markets. It therefore lies in the interest of regional stakeholders to help support
family business continuity. One way to do this is by providing consulting services
for family entrepreneurs, especially when searching for a family-external
successor. Succession consultancy, however is still in its infancy. Applying the
framework of the organizational field that centers on the concept of legitimacy,
this paper examines the strategies consultants employ in order to get selected by
family entrepreneurs in their succession process, as well as consultants'
strategies to match family firms with external successors. Based on expert
interviews with succession consultants in the region of Upper Palatinate in
Bavaria, we demonstrate the importance of geography and interpersonal linkages in
establishing legitimacy in the early stages of field formation, when heterogeneous
groups of actors offer their services without set rules or standards. Our content
analysis sheds light on the variety of strategies based on trust, networked, and
public reputation in order to gain legitimacy as consultants, depending on whether
or not they can draw on existing relationships with family firms. We furthermore
identify a discrepancy between these legitimation strategies and the actual ways
that consultants use to match family firms with external successors. Here,
regardless of their previous contact with family firms, geography plays a major
role in constraining both consulting and succession: Family firms more readily
accept local consultants, and the consultants also preferred to screen succession
candidates through their regional networks due to the higher chances of successful
succession when finding external successors from within the same region.
Conceptually, our analysis contributes to institutional theory by carving out
legitimacy-enhancing mechanisms in emerging organizational fields, and by
demonstrating the crucial role of geography and interpersonal linkages for
succession as well as field formation processes.
C1 [Lenz, Regina; Schormueller, Claudia; Glueckler, Johannes] Heidelberg Univ, Inst
Geog, Berliner Str 48, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
RP Lenz, R (corresponding author), Heidelberg Univ, Inst Geog, Berliner Str 48, D-
69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
EM lenz@uni-heidelberg.de; claudia.schormueller@alumni.uni-heidelberg.de;
glueckler@uni-heidelberg.de
RI Gluckler, Johannes/K-3807-2018
OI Gluckler, Johannes/0000-0002-2507-1556
CR Ahrens JP, 2019, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V43, P437, DOI 10.1177/1042258718816290
Armbruster T., 2006, EC SOCIOLOGY MANAGEM
Auschra C., 2019, Z WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGR, V2-4, P64
Bachmann R, 2001, ORGAN STUD, V22, P337, DOI 10.1177/0170840601222007
Barach J.A., 1995, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V8, P131, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1995.00131.X
Barbera F, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P271, DOI 10.1177/0894486513487198
Basco R, 2016, LOCAL ECON, V31, P709, DOI 10.1177/0269094216664485
Battisti M, 2015, SMALL ENTERP RES, V22, P32, DOI 10.1080/13215906.2015.1022129
 Bayerisches Landesamt fur Statistik, 2018, REG BEV BAYERN BIS 2
Berger P, 1969, DIE GESELLSCHAFTLICH
Bethge I., 2013, BASEL 3 FOLGEN MITTE
Cesaroni FM, 2017, SMALL ENTERP RES, V24, P167, DOI
10.1080/13215906.2017.1338193
Chua J.H., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P89, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00089.X
Colyvas JA, 2006, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V27, P305, DOI 10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27008-4
Coraiola D, 2018, KNOWL SPACE, V13, P45, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_3
Cucculelli M, 2008, J CORP FINANC, V14, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.11.001
Das TK, 2001, ORGAN STUD, V22, P251, DOI 10.1177/0170840601222004
David RJ, 2013, ORGAN SCI, V24, P356, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1120.0745
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
DIMAGGIO PJ, 1983, AM SOCIOL REV, V48, P147, DOI 10.2307/2095101
Farrell H, 2018, KNOWL SPACE, V13, P23, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_2
Gioia DA, 2013, ORGAN RES METHODS, V16, P15, DOI 10.1177/1094428112452151
Gluckler J, 2005, ENVIRON PLANN A, V37, P1727, DOI 10.1068/a3727
Gluckler J, 2003, ORGAN STUD, V24, P269, DOI 10.1177/0170840603024002346
Gluckler J., 2004, REPUTATIONSNETZE INT
Gluckler J., 2017, ELGAR COMPANION INNO, P258
Gluckler J, 2006, J ECON GEOGR, V6, P369, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbi016
Gluckler J, 2018, KNOWL SPACE, V13, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_1
Gottschalk S, 2017, VOLKSWIRTSCHAFTLICHE
Greenwood R, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P27
Greenwood R, 2002, ACAD MANAGE J, V45, P58, DOI 10.2307/3069285
Hargadon AB, 2001, ADMIN SCI QUART, V46, P476, DOI 10.2307/3094872
Jansson J, 2014, Z WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGR, V58, P202
Jung H., 2015, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG, P53
Kay R., 2013, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG
Kay R., 2018, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG
Kempert W., 2016, STANDARDS ORDNUNGSGE
KING S., 2003, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V16, P173, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.TB00012.X
Lange B, 2014, Z WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGR, V58, P187
Lawrence TB, 2015, ADMIN SCI QUART, V60, P371, DOI 10.1177/0001839215589813
Maguire S, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P657, DOI 10.2307/20159610
Mandl I., 2008, OVERVIEW FAMILY BUSI
Mayring P., 2019, HDB METHODEN EMPIRIS, P633, DOI [10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_42,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_42]
MEYER JW, 1977, AM J SOCIOL, V83, P340, DOI 10.1086/226550
Mickelson R. E., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P251
Miller D, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P513, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
Minichilli A, 2014, J MANAGE STUD, V51, P1153, DOI 10.1111/joms.12095
Molly V, 2010, FAM BUS REV, V23, P131, DOI 10.1177/0894486510365062
Mumford MD, 2000, LEADERSHIP QUART, V11, P87, DOI 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00044-2
Murmann J., 2018, FACTS FIGUES ZUM BER
Murmann J., 2019, FACTS FIGUES ZUM BER
Murray B., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P17, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00017.X
Naldi L, 2015, FAM BUS REV, V28, P227, DOI 10.1177/0894486515581951
OLIVER C, 1991, ACAD MANAGE REV, V16, P145, DOI 10.2307/258610
Preminger B., 2016, RES SOCIOLOGY ORG A, P101
Radiker S., 2019, ANAL QUALITATIVER DA
Reay T, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P209, DOI 10.1177/0894486513494277
Reddrop A, 2015, J FAM BUS MANAG, V5, P90, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-08-2014-0018
Royer S, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00108.x
Salvato C, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P235, DOI 10.1177/0894486513490796
Scholes L, 2008, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V15, P8, DOI 10.1108/14626000810850829
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00001.X
Steier L., 2010, J FAMILY BUSINESS ST, V1, P145, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.JFBS.2010.07.001
Strang D., 2002, BLACKWELL COMPANION, P467
Strike V. M., 2012, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P1
Sturdy A, 1997, J MANAGE STUD, V34, P389, DOI 10.1111/1467-6486.00056
SUCHMAN MC, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P571, DOI 10.2307/258788
Suddaby R, 2017, ACAD MANAG ANN, V11, P451, DOI 10.5465/annals.2015.0101
Sund LG, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.07.001
Wallau F., 2019, ERHEBUNG ANAL UNTERN
Walsh G., 2011, FAMILY BUSINESS SUCC
Zhu DH, 2016, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V37, P2695, DOI 10.1002/smj.2471
Zietsma C, 2017, ACAD MANAG ANN, V11, P391, DOI 10.5465/annals.2014.0052
Zietsma C, 2010, ADMIN SCI QUART, V55, P189, DOI 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189
NR 75
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 4
U2 4
PU WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
PI BERLIN
PA GENTHINER STRASSE 13, D-10785 BERLIN, GERMANY
SN 0044-3751
EI 2365-7693
J9 Z WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGR
JI Z. Wirtsch.
PD JUN
PY 2020
VL 64
IS 2
BP 58
EP 73
DI 10.1515/zfw-2019-0019
PG 16
WC Economics; Geography
SC Business & Economics; Geography
GA LW1YL
UT WOS:000538942000002
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Zhao, J
Carney, M
Zhang, SB
Zhu, LM
AF Zhao, Jing
Carney, Michael
Zhang, Shubo
Zhu, Limin
TI How does an intra-family succession effect strategic change and
performance in China's family firms?
SO ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Family firms; Strategic change; Succession; Foriegn education;
Performance
ID MODERATING ROLE; TOP-MANAGEMENT; CEO TENURE; ENTREPRENEURIAL
ORIENTATION; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; UPPER ECHELONS; FOUNDER; GOVERNANCE;
IMPACT; BUSINESS
AB Motivated by the sparse literature on succession dynamics in China and other
transitional markets we consider the effects of initiating an intra-family
leadership succession on firm strategic change and performance on a sample of
publicly listed family firms from China. Grounded in upper echelons theory we find
that the initiation of a succession process leads to significant strategic change.
Based on generational differences between founders and successors we find the
succession-strategic change relationship is positively moderated by a successor's
international education. We also consider the strategic change to performance
relationship.
C1 [Zhao, Jing; Zhu, Limin] Renmin Univ China, Sch Business, 59 Zhongguancun St,
Beijing, Peoples R China.
[Carney, Michael] Concordia Univ, John Molson Sch Business, 1445 De Maisonneuve
Blvd, West Montreal, PQ H3G 1M6, Canada.
[Zhang, Shubo] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Sch Accountancy, Shatin, Hong Kong,
Peoples R China.
RP Carney, M (corresponding author), Concordia Univ, John Molson Sch Business, 1445
De Maisonneuve Blvd, West Montreal, PQ H3G 1M6, Canada.
EM zhaojing@rbs.ruc.edu.cn; michael.carney@concordia.ca;
zhangshubo@link.cuhk.edu.hk; zhulimin123@ruc.edu.cn
CR Au K, 2013, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V30, P749, DOI 10.1007/s10490-012-9331-7
Bassetti T, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.07.004
Bennedsen M, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P647, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
Bertrand M, 2006, J ECON PERSPECT, V20, P73, DOI 10.1257/jep.20.2.73
BIGGART NW, 1992, NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONS : STRUCTURE, FORM, AND ACTION, P471
Boeker W, 1997, ADMIN SCI QUART, V42, P213, DOI 10.2307/2393919
BOEKER W, 1988, ECOLOGICAL MODELS OR, P33
Boisot M, 2008, MANAGE ORGAN REV, V4, P349, DOI 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00116.x
Boling JR, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P891, DOI 10.1111/etap.12150
Cao J, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V33, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.005
Child J, 1997, ORGAN STUD, V18, P43, DOI 10.1177/017084069701800104
Chung CN, 2008, ORGAN SCI, V19, P124, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1070.0272
Chung CN, 2013, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V34, P338, DOI 10.1002/smj.2011
Cucculelli M, 2008, J CORP FINANC, V14, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.11.001
Cucculelli M, 2016, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V7, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.02.001
Daily C.M., 1992, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V30, P25
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
Dou JS, 2013, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V30, P893, DOI 10.1007/s10490-012-9287-7
Eddleston KA, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P1177, DOI 10.1111/etap.12002
Engelen A, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P1137, DOI 10.1111/etap.12099
Ermisch J, 2010, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V75, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.007
Fainshmidt S, 2018, J WORLD BUS, V53, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2016.05.003
FINKELSTEIN S, 1990, ADMIN SCI QUART, V35, P484, DOI 10.2307/2393314
Finkelstein S, 2009, STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP
Fuller D. B., 2016, PAPER TIGERS HIDDEN
Gedajlovic E, 2004, J MANAGE STUD, V41, P899, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2004.00459.x
Gedajlovic E, 2012, J MANAGE, V38, P1010, DOI 10.1177/0149206311429990
Geers AL, 2002, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V28, P1026, DOI 10.1177/01461672022811002
Geletkanycz MA, 1997, ADMIN SCI QUART, V42, P654, DOI 10.2307/2393653
Girma S, 2007, J INT ECON, V72, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.07.006
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2011, ACAD MANAG ANN, V5, P653, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2011.593320
GREENHALGH S, 1994, AM ETHNOL, V21, P746, DOI 10.1525/ae.1994.21.4.02a00050
Gruhn B, 2017, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V41, P591, DOI [10.1111/etap.12239,
10.1111/etp.12239]
HAMBRICK DC, 1984, ACAD MANAGE REV, V9, P193, DOI 10.2307/258434
Hambrick DC, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P334, DOI 10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
 Hambrick DC, 2014, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V35, P473, DOI 10.1002/smj.2108
HANNAN MT, 1984, AM SOCIOL REV, V49, P149, DOI 10.2307/2095567
Haveman HA, 2004, J BUS VENTURING, V19, P437, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00039-9
Haynes KT, 2010, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V31, P1145, DOI 10.1002/smj.859
Hayward MLA, 1997, ADMIN SCI QUART, V42, P103, DOI 10.2307/2393810
Henderson AD, 2006, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V27, P447, DOI 10.1002/smj.524
Heugens PPMAR, 2009, ACAD MANAGE J, V52, P61, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2009.36461835
Hmieleski KM, 2009, ACAD MANAGE J, V52, P473, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2009.41330755
HREBINIAK LG, 1985, ADMIN SCI QUART, V30, P336, DOI 10.2307/2392666
Hutzschenreuter T, 2012, LEADERSHIP QUART, V23, P729, DOI
10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.06.005
Ishida H, 1997, AM SOCIOL REV, V62, P866, DOI 10.2307/2657344
KOSNIK RD, 1990, ACAD MANAGE J, V33, P129, DOI 10.2307/256355
KOTHA S, 1995, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V16, P497, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250160702
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Le Breton-Miller I, 2006, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V30, P731, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2006.00147.x
Le Breton-Miller I, 2011, ORGAN SCI, V22, P704, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1100.0541
Leitterstorf MP, 2014, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V35, P751, DOI 10.1002/smj.2236
Li JT, 2010, ACAD MANAGE J, V53, P45, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48036912
Miralles-Marcelo JL, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P156, DOI
10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.03.002
Luo JH, 2013, MANAGE ORGAN REV, V9, P265, DOI 10.1111/more.12000
Luo YD, 2012, MANAGE ORGAN REV, V8, P139, DOI 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00273.x
MILLER D, 1991, MANAGE SCI, V37, P34, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.37.1.34
Miller D, 2007, J CORP FINANC, V13, P829, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004
Miller D, 2013, ORGAN SCI, V24, P189, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0728
Minichilli A, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P205, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2009.00888.x
NEE V, 1992, ADMIN SCI QUART, V37, P1, DOI 10.2307/2393531
Obschonka M, 2011, J VOCAT BEHAV, V79, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.12.005
Peng MW, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P275, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2003.9416341
Perez-Gonzalez F, 2006, AM ECON REV, V96, P1559, DOI 10.1257/aer.96.5.1559
Petersen MA, 2009, REV FINANC STUD, V22, P435, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhn053
Pi LL, 2011, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V28, P775, DOI 10.1007/s10490-009-9178-8
Quigley TJ, 2012, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V33, P834, DOI 10.1002/smj.1945
Ralston DA, 1999, J INT BUS STUD, V30, P415, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490077
Redding G., 1990, SPIRIT CHINESE CAPIT
Sardeshmukh SR, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P111, DOI 10.1177/0894486510391783
Schulze WS, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P447, DOI 10.1111/etap.12159
Sharma P. J. J., 1997, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V10, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1997.00001.X
Shen W, 2002, ACAD MANAGE J, V45, P1195, DOI 10.2307/3069434
Song H, 2013, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V30, P735, DOI 10.1007/s10490-012-9316-6
Steier L., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P259, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2001.00259.X
Steier LP, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P1265, DOI 10.1111/etap.12180
Su Qilin, 2003, EC RES J, pP36
Tang JY, 2011, J MANAGE STUD, V48, P1479, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00985.x
Tang Z, 2012, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V50, P132, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2011.00347.x
Tsang EWK, 2002, J BUS VENTURING, V17, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00052-5
van Essen M, 2015, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V23, P3, DOI 10.1111/corg.12080
van Essen M, 2012, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V29, P873, DOI 10.1007/s10490-011-9269-1
Wang T, 2015, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V32, P685, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12152
Wasserman N, 2003, ORGAN SCI, V14, P149, DOI 10.1287/orsc.14.2.149.14995
Wasserman N, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P960
Weng DH, 2014, J MANAGE, V40, P2009, DOI 10.1177/0149206312449867
Whyte MK, 1996, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V45, P1, DOI 10.1086/452256
 WIERSEMA MF, 1993, ACAD MANAGE J, V36, P996, DOI 10.2307/256643
WILLARD GE, 1992, J BUS VENTURING, V7, P181, DOI 10.1016/0883-9026(92)90025-M
Young MN, 2008, J MANAGE STUD, V45, P196, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00752.x
Zhang JJ, 2009, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V26, P119, DOI 10.1007/s10490-008-9099-y
Zhang Y, 2010, STRATEG MANAGE J, V31, P334, DOI 10.1002/smj.812
NR 92
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 8
U2 11
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0217-4561
EI 1572-9958
J9 ASIA PAC J MANAG
JI Asia Pac. J. Manag.
PD JUN
PY 2020
VL 37
IS 2
SI SI
BP 363
EP 389
DI 10.1007/s10490-018-9568-x
PG 27
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA LU4RJ
UT WOS:000537744100002
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Campopiano, G
Calabro, A
Basco, R
AF Campopiano, Giovanna
Calabro, Andrea
Basco, Rodrigo
TI The "Most Wanted": The Role of Family Strategic Resources and Family
Involvement in CEO Succession Intention
SO FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE CEO succession intention; family strategic resources; TMT; family
involvement; familiness; resource-based view; STEP
ID TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; FIRM PERFORMANCE;
PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS SUCCESSION; BEHAVIORAL DYNAMICS;
DECISION-MAKING; NONFAMILY; GOVERNANCE; FAMILINESS
AB Stemming from familiness and the notion of nonimitable strategic resources, we
investigate, in the presuccession phase, the role of acquisition and accumulation
of family strategic resources, along with the way family involvement in the top
management team affects resource mobilization and deployment, in determining the
intention to choose either a family or a nonfamily member as the next CEO. Data
from a cross-country double-respondent family business data set (Successful
Transgenerational Entrepreneurship Practices project) reveal that human capital is
a significant family strategic resource reducing the intention to select a family
CEO, although leveraging this resource by a top management team dominated by family
members enhances this intention.
C1 [Campopiano, Giovanna] Univ Lancaster, Management Sch, Dept Entrepreneurship &
Strategy, Ctr Family Business, Lancaster, England.
[Campopiano, Giovanna] Univ Witten Herdecke, Witten Inst Family Business WIFU,
Witten, Germany.
[Calabro, Andrea] IPAG Business Sch, IPAG Entrepreneurship & Family Business
Ctr, Nice, France.
[Calabro, Andrea] IPAG Business Sch, Family Business & Entrepreneurship, Nice,
France.
[Basco, Rodrigo] Amer Univ Sharjah, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates.
RP Campopiano, G (corresponding author), Univ Witten Herdecke, Witten Inst Family
Business WIFU, Witten, Germany.; Campopiano, G (corresponding author), Univ
Lancaster, Ctr Family Business, Management Sch, Lancaster LA1 4YX, England.
EM g.campopiano@lancaster.ac.uk
RI Campopiano, Giovanna/R-5483-2016
OI Campopiano, Giovanna/0000-0002-5122-1095
CR Adler PS, 2002, ACAD MANAGE REV, V27, P17, DOI 10.2307/4134367
Anderson RC, 2003, J FINANC ECON, V68, P263, DOI 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00067-9
Andrich D., 1978, APPL PSYCH MEAS, V2, P581, DOI DOI 10.1177/014662167800200413
Arregle JL, 2007, J MANAGE STUD, V44, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00665.x
Astrachan J.H., 1994, FAM BUS REV, V7, P251, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1994.00251.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1994.00251.X]
Au K, 2013, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V30, P749, DOI 10.1007/s10490-012-9331-7
BARNEY J, 1991, J MANAGE, V17, P99, DOI 10.1177/014920639101700108
Barney J., 1995, ACAD MANAG LEARN EDU, V9, P49, DOI DOI
10.5465/AME.1995.9512032192
Barney JB, 2001, J MANAGE, V27, P643, DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00115-5
Basco R., 2017, J BUSINESS EC, V87, P487, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11573-016-0828-2
Basco R, 2019, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.03.004
Basco R, 2014, INT SMALL BUS J, V32, P967, DOI 10.1177/0266242613484946
BAYSINGER BD, 1991, ACAD MANAGE J, V34, P205, DOI 10.2307/256308
Bennedsen M, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P647, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
Berns KVD, 2017, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V31, P83, DOI 10.5465/amp.2015.0183
Blumentritt TP, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P1261, DOI 10.1111/etap.12245
Bocatto E, 2010, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V48, P497, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2010.00306.x
Boyd B, 2014, INT J FINANC STUD, V2, P335, DOI 10.3390/ijfs2040335
Brockhaus R.H., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P165, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2004.00011.X
Cabrera-Suarez K., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P37, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2001.00037.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00037.X]
Calabro A, 2018, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V39, P2014, DOI 10.1002/smj.2760
Carney M, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P249, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00081.x
Chandler GN, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P1305, DOI 10.1111/etap.12175
Chen YM, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P5111, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.089
Chittoor R, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00084.x
Chrisman J. J., 2003, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V27, P359, DOI DOI 10.1111/1540-
8520.T01-1-00014
Chrisman JJ, 2012, ACAD MANAGE J, V55, P976, DOI 10.5465/amj.2011.0211
Chrisman JJ, 2012, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V36, P267, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2010.00407.x
Chrisman JJ, 2009, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V33, P739, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2009.00324.x
Chrisman JJ, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P237, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00080.x
Chua JH, 2011, J BUS VENTURING, V26, P472, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.11.002
Churchill N. C., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P53, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1997.00053.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1997.00053.X]
 Combs JG, 2011, J MANAGE STUD, V48, P1098, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00912.x
Cruz C, 2012, J BUS VENTURING, V27, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.07.002
Danes SM, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P199, DOI 10.1177/0894486509333424
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
Davis P. S., 1999, FAM BUS REV, V12, P311, DOI [10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9,
DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1999.00311.X, 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00311.x.]
Davis P. S., 1998, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V22, P31, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879802200302
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
De Massis A, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P278, DOI 10.1177/0894486516656276
De Massis A, 2015, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V53, P924, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12093
De Massis A, 2014, FAM BUS REV, V27, P35, DOI 10.1177/0894486513506114
Dibrell C, 2019, J BUS RES, V101, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.005
DIERICKX I, 1989, MANAGE SCI, V35, P1504, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504
Dou JS, 2014, FAM BUS REV, V27, P259, DOI 10.1177/0894486514538449
Dyer WG, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P253, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00074.x
Eddleston KA, 2008, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V46, P456, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2008.00252.x
Eddleston KA, 2008, J MANAGE STUD, V45, P26, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2007.00717.x
Eisenhardt KM, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P1105, DOI 10.1002/1097-
0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Ensley MD, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P267, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00082.x
Fang H, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P1017, DOI 10.1111/etap.12156
Foss NJ, 2013, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V34, P1453, DOI 10.1002/smj.2135
Frank H, 2017, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V41, P709, DOI 10.1111/etap.12229
Fulmer R.M., 2004, GROWING YOUR CO LEAD
Gagne M, 2019, FAM BUS REV, DOI 10.1177/0894486519894759
Gallucci C, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.07.003
Gedajlovic E, 2004, J MANAGE STUD, V41, P899, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2004.00459.x
Gersick K. E., 1997, GENERATION GENERATIO
Giambatista RC, 2005, LEADERSHIP QUART, V16, P963, DOI
10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.005
Gimeno J, 1997, ADMIN SCI QUART, V42, P750, DOI 10.2307/2393656
Habbershon T.G., 1999, FAM BUS REV, V12, P1, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1999.00001.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1999.00001.X]
Habbershon T. G., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P223, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002
Habbershon TG, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P451, DOI 10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00053-3
Hair JF, 2009, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
HALL R, 1993, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V14, P607, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250140804
HANDLER W. C., 1994, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V7, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00133.X
Hillman AJ, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P383, DOI 10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
Hitt MA, 2001, ACAD MANAGE J, V44, P13, DOI 10.2307/3069334
Holcomb TR, 2009, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V30, P457, DOI 10.1002/smj.747
Holt DT, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P61, DOI 10.1177/0894486516673700
Howard MC, 2016, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V32, P51, DOI
10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664
Hubler T., 1999, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V12, P117, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1999.00117.x
Ireland RD, 2003, J MANAGE, V29, P963, DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00086-2
James H. S., 1999, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V12, P61, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1999.00061.X
Janjuha-Jivraj S, 2009, INT SMALL BUS J, V27, P702, DOI 10.1177/0266242609344252
Jaskiewicz P, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P781, DOI 10.1111/etap.12146
 Cabrera-Suarez MK, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P178, DOI 10.1177/0894486518776867
Kellermanns FW, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P313, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00085.x
Klein KJ, 2000, ORGAN RES METHODS, V3, P211, DOI 10.1177/109442810033001
Klein SB, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00086.x
Kor YY, 2003, ORGAN SCI, V14, P707, DOI 10.1287/orsc.14.6.707.24867
Kor YY, 2004, J MANAGE STUD, V41, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00427.x
Kotlar J, 2014, SMALL BUS ECON, V43, P597, DOI 10.1007/s11187-014-9556-6
Kuiken A., 2015, THEORETICAL PERSPECT, P99, DOI [10.4337/9781783479665.00013,
DOI 10.4337/9781783479665.00013]
KUMAR N, 1993, ACAD MANAGE J, V36, P1633, DOI 10.2307/256824
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Leana CR, 1999, ACAD MANAGE REV, V24, P538, DOI 10.2307/259141
Leaptrott J, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P215, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00043.x
Lee KS, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P657
Lin SH, 2007, CORP GOV, V15, P1348, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00650.x
Lubatkin MH, 2005, J ORGAN BEHAV, V26, P313, DOI 10.1002/job.307
MAHONEY JT, 1992, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V13, P363, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250130505
Makadok R, 2001, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V22, P387, DOI 10.1002/smj.158
Mathews T, 2015, SMALL BUS ECON, V45, P15, DOI 10.1007/s11187-015-9628-2
Michiels A, 2015, SMALL BUS ECON, V44, P299, DOI 10.1007/s11187-014-9594-0
MILLER D, 1991, MANAGE SCI, V37, P34, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.37.1.34
Miller D, 2014, J MANAGE STUD, V51, P547, DOI 10.1111/joms.12076
Miller KD, 2002, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V23, P689, DOI 10.1002/smj.245
Minichilli A, 2016, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V24, P552, DOI 10.1111/corg.12125
Minichilli A, 2014, J MANAGE STUD, V51, P1153, DOI 10.1111/joms.12095
Minichilli A, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P205, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2009.00888.x
Mizumoto F. M., 2013, HDB RES FAMILY BUSIN, P236, DOI
[10.4337/9781848443228.00021, DOI 10.4337/9781848443228.00021]
Morris M., 1996, INT J ENTREPRENEURIA, V2, P68, DOI DOI
10.1108/13552559610153261
Nordqvist M, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P285, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00083.x
Nordqvist M, 2014, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V52, P192, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12096
Nordqvist M, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V40, P1087, DOI 10.1007/s11187-012-9466-4
Oliveira B, 2006, SMALL BUS ECON, V27, P139, DOI 10.1007/s11187-006-0006-y
Pardo-del-Val M., 2009, INT ENTREPRENEURSHIP, V5, P165, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11365-
008-0092-1
Parker SC, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P1241, DOI 10.1111/etap.12242
Pearson AW, 2008, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V32, P949, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2008.00265.x
Penrose E. T., 1959, THEORY GROWTH FIRM
PERRICONE PJ, 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P105, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2001.00105.X
PETERAF MA, 1993, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V14, P179, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250140303
Podsakoff PM, 2003, J APPL PSYCHOL, V88, P879, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Royer S, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00108.x
Salvato C, 2010, ENTREP REGION DEV, V22, P321, DOI 10.1080/08985621003726192
Samara G, 2018, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V9, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.11.004
Sanchez-Ruiz P, 2019, FAM BUS REV, V32, P131, DOI 10.1177/0894486519836833
Schepker DJ, 2017, LEADERSHIP QUART, V28, P701, DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.03.001
Sciascia S, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P69, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2012.00528.x
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P293, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00084.x
Sharma P., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00001.X
 Sharma P., 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V25, P17, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870102500302
Sharma P, 2008, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V32, P971, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2008.00266.x
Sirmon DS, 2003, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V27, P339, DOI DOI 10.1111/1540-8520.T01-
1-00013
SMILKSTEIN G, 1982, J FAM PRACTICE, V15, P303
Stavrou E. T., 1998, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V23, P19
Stavrou ET, 2003, INT SMALL BUS J, V21, P331, DOI 10.1177/02662426030213005
Steijvers T, 2010, SMALL BUS ECON, V34, P243, DOI 10.1007/s11187-008-9124-z
Stewart A, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P58, DOI 10.1177/0894486511421665
Successful Transgenerational Entrepreneurship Practices, 2015, QUANT SURV RES
2015
Teece DJ, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P509, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Umans I., J FAMILY BUSINESS ST, DOI [10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.12.002, DOI
10.1016/J.JFBS.2018.12.002]
Westhead P, 2003, INT SMALL BUS J, V21, P369, DOI 10.1177/02662426030214001
Yan J, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P235, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00072.x
Zahra SA, 2012, SMALL BUS ECON, V38, P51, DOI 10.1007/s11187-010-9266-7
Zellweger T, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00080.x
NR 137
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 5
U2 12
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0894-4865
EI 1741-6248
J9 FAM BUS REV
JI Fam. Bus. Rev.
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 33
IS 3
BP 284
EP 309
AR 0894486520927289
DI 10.1177/0894486520927289
EA MAY 2020
PG 26
WC Business
SC Business & Economics
GA MR2UR
UT WOS:000536585600001
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Rengel, R
Monteiro, JJ
Petri, SM
Schnorrenberger, D
AF Rengel, Rodrigo
Monteiro, Januario Jose
Petri, Sergio Murilo
Schnorrenberger, Darci
TI STRATEGIC PLANNING IN AN ACCOUNTING OFFICE IN THE FAMILY SUCCESSION
PROCESS
SO REVISTA GESTAO ORGANIZACIONAL
LA Portuguese
DT Article
DE Balanced Scorecard; Accounting Office; Strategic Planning; Family
Succession
ID PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT
AB The objective of this research was to develop the strategic alignment of an
accounting firm that goes through family succession based on BSC. The research is
characterized as action research, descriptive and qualitative. The strategic
alignment was elaborated from an improved BSC performance panel for the 2018/2019
period. The linear valuation method was used, for value function, to demonstrate
mathematically the value judgments that the manager attributes to each criterion.
It resulted in a performance panel composed of 4 perspectives, divided into 17
strategic objectives, with established indicators, goals, initiatives and
responsible persons. Through the global score, the current situation of -6 points
was identified and the goal of reaching 67 points was assigned. Graphical
representation can assist the manager in prioritizing corrective actions. The
results are aligned with previous studies on the use of the BSC in accounting
companies because its development helps in the communication and implementation of
the strategy and in the evaluation of organizational performance. It contributes to
the literature and with the practical part for contemplating an organization in the
phase of a family succession of the branch of accounting.
C1 [Rengel, Rodrigo; Monteiro, Januario Jose; Petri, Sergio Murilo;
Schnorrenberger, Darci] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, R Jornalista Tito
Carvalho,101,Bloco C1,Apto 202, BR-88040480 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.
RP Rengel, R (corresponding author), Univ Fed Santa Catarina, R Jornalista Tito
Carvalho,101,Bloco C1,Apto 202, BR-88040480 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.
EM rengel.rodrigo@hotmail.com; januariomonteiromonteiro@gmail.com;
smpetri@gmail.com; darcisc@gmail.com
CR AMARAL B. G., 2016, REAVI REV ELETRONICA, V5, P071, DOI
[10.5965/2316419005072016071, DOI 10.5965/2316419005072016071]
[Anonymous], 2003, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V28, P127, DOI [10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-
7, DOI 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7]
Ballinger GA, 2010, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V31, P262, DOI 10.1002/smj.808
Bennedsen M, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V33, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.008
Bititci U, 2012, INT J MANAG REV, V14, P305, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
2370.2011.00318.x
Carneiro-da-Cunha JA, 2016, INT J BUS PERFORM MA, V17, P223
Chia A, 2009, BENCHMARKING, V16, P605, DOI 10.1108/14635770910987832
COELHO G. N., 2019, REV UNEMAT CONTABILI, V8
Craig J, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P105, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00035.x
Cucculelli M, 2008, J CORP FINANC, V14, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.11.001
Cucculelli M, 2016, FUTURES, V75, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2015.10.011
Ekholm BG, 2011, J BUS FINAN ACCOUNT, V38, P145, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
5957.2010.02228.x
FARIAS R. A. S., 2016, CADERNO PROFISSIONAL, V6, P44
GASPARETTO A. S., 2007, REV CONTABILIDADE ME, V12, P1
Ghalayini AM, 1996, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V16, P63, DOI 10.1108/01443579610125787
Giambatista RC, 2005, LEADERSHIP QUART, V16, P963, DOI
10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.005
GRAY D. E., 2012, PESQUISA MUNDO REAL
Greiner L, 2003, ORGAN DYN, V32, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00134-1
KAPLAN R. S., 1997, ESTRATEGIA ACAO BALA
Kaplan R. S., 2004, MAPAS ESTRATEGICOS C
Kaplan R. S., 1992, HARVARD MANAGER, V14, P37
Kaplan R. S., 2000, ORG ORIENTADA ESTRAT
Kimhi A, 1997, SMALL BUS ECON, V9, P309, DOI 10.1023/A:1007987731337
 Lacerda Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira, 2012, Gest. Prod., V19, P59, DOI
10.1590/S0104-530X2012000100005
Mazzola P, 2006, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON FAMILY BUSINESS, P402
Melnyk SA, 2014, MANAGE ACCOUNT RES, V25, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007
Miller D, 2008, J MANAGE STUD, V45, P51, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00718.x
MONTEIRO J. J., 2019, REV PENSAMENTO CONT, V13, P1, DOI
[10.12712/rpca.v13i2.28146, DOI 10.12712/RPCA.V13I2.28146]
Monteiro JJ, 2019, CUST AGRONEGOCIO, V15, P93
MONTENEGRO F. R. M. S., 2019, REV GESTAO ORG, V14, DOI [10.22277/rgo.v14i1.4540,
DOI 10.22277/RG0.V14I1.4540]
Morris MH, 1997, J BUS VENTURING, V12, P385, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00010-4
PEREIRA M. C. C., 2005, PENSAR CONTABIL, V7
PETRI S. M., 2005, THESIS
RENGEL R., 2019, REV CATARINENSE CIEN, V18, P2839, DOI [10.16930/2237-
766220192839, DOI 10.16930/2237-766220192839]
SILVEIRA M, 2018, THESIS
SOARES B. B., 2013, REV CONTABILIDADE CI, V1, P145
Tillmann Cátia, 2005, Organ. Soc., V12, P45, DOI 10.1590/S1984-92302005000100003
Vancil RF, 1987, PASSING BATON MANAGI
Vansnick J. C., 1995, INVEST OPER-LISBON, V15, P15
VIEIRA R. T., 2014, PENSAR CONTABIL, V16
Weng TC, 2019, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V53, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.09.001
NR 41
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 5
PU UNIV COMUNITARIA REGIONAL CHAPECO-UNOCHAPECO
PI SANTA CATARINA
PA AVE SENADOR ATTILIO FONTANA, 591-E, BAIRRO EFAPI, CAIXA POSTAL 1141
CHAPECO, SANTA CATARINA, 89809-000, BRAZIL
SN 1983-6635
J9 REV GEST ORGAN
JI Rev. Gest. Organ.
PD MAY-AUG
PY 2020
VL 13
IS 2
BP 6
EP 25
PG 20
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA LX7FY
UT WOS:000539994300002
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Bertolozzi-Caredio, D
Bardaji, I
Coopmans, I
Soriano, B
Garrido, A
AF Bertolozzi-Caredio, Daniele
Bardaji, Isabel
Coopmans, Isabeau
Soriano, Barbara
Garrido, Alberto
TI Key steps and dynamics of family farm succession in marginal extensive
livestock farming
SO JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Generational renewal; Young farmers; Successors; Family farming; Farm
transfer; Content analysis
ID GENERATION FARMERS; LAND ABANDONMENT; GROUNDED THEORY; POLICY;
AGRICULTURE; GENDER; EUROPE; CRISIS; IMPACT; MARKET
AB Succession trends in agriculture have been downward in many European regions,
especially in the less favoured and mountainous areas of southern Europe. This
article aims at understanding family farm succession dynamics in extensive
livestock farming of two marginal areas in Spain. We approached the issue applying
a qualitative methodology based on inductive content analysis of open interviews
with 28 farmers and relatives. The evidence shows that family farm succession is a
long-term and multidimensional process during which successors pass through three
stages: potential succession, willingness to succeed and effective succession. The
factors determining succession can be classed into four dimensions that affect the
succession stages differently. Individual and familial dimensions are found to
include the most influential factors shaping the potential successor, whereas the
influence of familial factors drops in favour of the individual dimension at the
willingness stage. The contextual and institutional dimensions mainly influence the
willingness and effective succession stages. The scope of policies should be
broadened beyond effective succession by enhancing the intention of willing
successors to take over the business.
C1 [Bertolozzi-Caredio, Daniele; Bardaji, Isabel; Soriano, Barbara; Garrido,
Alberto] CEIGRAM Univ Politecn Madrid, Calle Senda del Rey 13, Madrid 28040, Spain.
[Coopmans, Isabeau] ILVO Res Inst Agr Fisheries & Food, Burgemeester Van
Gansberghelaan 92, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
RP Bertolozzi-Caredio, D (corresponding author), Calle Santovenia 16, Madrid 28008,
Spain.
EM daniele.bertolozzi@upm.es
RI BARDAJI, ISABEL/AAS-3286-2020
OI , Barbara/0000-0002-3038-3351
FU European CommissionEuropean CommissionEuropean Commission Joint Research
Centre [727520]
FX This research has been carried out within the framework of the SURE-Farm
Project -Towards SUstainable and REsilient EU FARMing systems, a project
funded by the European Commission (project no. 727520). The authors
thank ILVO (Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries, and
Food) as the partner who led the related project task under SURE-Farm.
CR Aldanondo Ochoa AM, 2007, SPAN J AGRIC RES, V5, P214, DOI 10.5424/sjar/2007052-
241
Anguaiano E., 2008, JRC SCI TECHNICAL RE
Bernues A, 2005, LIVEST PROD SCI, V96, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.05.023
Bertoni D., 2016, PERSPECT AGR VET SCI, V43, P1
Brandth B, 2013, SOCIOL RURALIS, V53, P95, DOI 10.1111/soru.12003
Burton RJF, 2015, SOCIOL RURALIS, V55, P155, DOI 10.1111/soru.12080
Calus M., 2008, 12 C EUR ASS AGR EC
Cassidy A, 2015, J RURAL STUD, V37, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.11.006
Cavicchioli D, 2018, J RURAL STUD, V61, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.06.002
Cavicchioli D, 2015, MT RES DEV, V35, P152, DOI 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00107.1
Chiswell HM, 2018, SOCIOL RURALIS, V58, P104, DOI 10.1111/soru.12138
Chiswell HM, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P300, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12131
Chiswell HM, 2015, SOCIOL RURALIS, V55, P150, DOI 10.1111/soru.12071
Cho JY, 2014, QUAL REP, V19, DOI 10.7838/jsebs.2014.19.1.001
Commins P., 1973, FARM INHERITANCE SUC
Conway SF, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V54, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.007
CORBIN J, 1990, Z SOZIOL, V19, P418, DOI 10.1007/BF00988593
 Corsi A., 2017, SUCCESSION DECISIONS, P338
Cramer VA, 2008, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V23, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.005
Denzin N.K., 2008, COLLECTING INTERPRET
Eistrup M, 2019, LAND-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/land8040070
Errington A. J., 1998, Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, V5,
P123, DOI 10.1080/13892249885300241
Fau L.R., 2016, OVINO CAPRINO ARAGON
Fischer H, 2014, SOCIOL RURALIS, V54, P417, DOI 10.1111/soru.12055
Gehrels S., 2013, RES HOSPITALITY MANA, V3, P19, DOI DOI
10.1080/22243534.2013.11828299
Glover JL, 2013, J FAM BUS MANAG, V3, P136, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-01-2013-0001
Grubbstrom A, 2012, J HIST GEOGR, V38, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.jhg.2012.03.001
Hamilton W., 2015, ENGLAND AGR, V61, P61, DOI [10.17707/AGRICULTFOREST.61.4.05,
DOI 10.17707/AGRICULTFOREST.61.4.05]
Harris J.M., 2012, AAEA JOINT ANN M SEA
Hinojosa L, 2016, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V221, P115, DOI
10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.032
Hsieh HF, 2005, QUAL HEALTH RES, V15, P1277, DOI 10.1177/1049732305276687
Inwood SM, 2012, J RURAL STUD, V28, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.07.005
Jenkins R., 2008, SOCIAL IDENTITY
Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (JRC), 2013, ASSESSING RISK
FARML
Joosse S, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V50, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.018
Keenleyside C., 2010, FARMLAND ABANDONMENT
Konecki KT, 2018, SYMB INTERACT, V41, P547, DOI 10.1002/symb.361
Kristensen SBP, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V57, P786, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.014
Leonard B, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V61, P147, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.006
Levers C, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V644, P95, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.326
Lobley M, 2010, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V1, P49, DOI 10.5304/jafscd.2010.011.009
MacDonald D, 2000, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V59, P47, DOI 10.1006/jema.1999.0335
Mann S, 2005, J AGR ENVIRON ETHIC, V18, P369, DOI 10.1007/s10806-005-7049-y
Mann S, 2007, SOCIOL RURALIS, V47, P369, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00442.x
Mayring P., 2000, FORUM QUALITATIVE SO, V1, DOI [10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089, DOI
10.17169/FQS-1.2.1089]
Milone P, 2019, J RURAL STUD, V65, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.009
Mishra AK, 2008, REV ECON HOUSEHOLD, V6, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11150-008-9032-7
Morais M, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V71, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.002
Morais M, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V68, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.024
Peco B, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V249, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.08.013
Perpina Castillo C., 2018, JRC113718 EUR COMM
Petty NJ, 2012, MANUAL THER, V17, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.math.2012.03.004
Pindado E, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V77, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.014
Pinto-Correia T, 2015, TRANSITION PATHWAYS TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY IN
AGRICULTURE: CASE STUDIES FROM EUROPE, P67, DOI 10.1079/9781780642192.0067
Potter C, 1996, SOCIOL RURALIS, V36, P286, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
9523.1996.tb00023.x
POTTER C, 1992, SOCIOL RURALIS, V32, P317, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
9523.1992.tb00935.x
Potter WJ, 1999, J APPL COMMUN RES, V27, P258, DOI 10.1080/00909889909365539
Regos A, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P199, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0740-7
Riley M, 2014, J RURAL STUD, V36, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.09.003
Schreier Margrit, 2012, QUALITATIVE CONTENT
Stiglbauer A., 2000, CAHIERS EC SOCIOLOGI, V54, P5
Tsang EWK, 2014, INT J MANAG REV, V16, P369, DOI 10.1111/ijmr.12024
Uchiyama T., 2008, Japanese Journal of Rural Economics, V10, P33
van der Zanden EH, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V62, P290, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.003
Wang C, 2010, J FAM ECON ISS, V31, P475, DOI 10.1007/s10834-010-9230-3
Wheeler S, 2012, J RURAL STUD, V28, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.04.001
Zagata L, 2015, J RURAL STUD, V38, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.003
NR 67
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 8
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0743-0167
J9 J RURAL STUD
JI J. Rural Stud.
PD MAY
PY 2020
VL 76
BP 131
EP 141
DI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.030
PG 11
WC Geography; Regional & Urban Planning
SC Geography; Public Administration
GA LR4WP
UT WOS:000535697500013
OA Other Gold, Green Published
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU van Helvert-Beugels, J
Nordqvist, M
Floren, R
AF van Helvert-Beugels, Judith
Nordqvist, Mattias
Floren, Roberto
TI Managing tensions as paradox in CEO succession: The case of nonfamily
CEO in a family firm
SO INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL-RESEARCHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP
LA English
DT Article
DE CEO succession; family firms; nonfamily CEO; paradox management; work
relationships
ID SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; CONTRADICTIONS; BUSINESSES;
INSIGHTS; AGENCY; FOCUS
AB An increasing number of family firms choose to select a nonfamily CEO for the
highest executive office. However, appointing a nonfamily CEO in a family firm
tends to give rise to tensions that need to be managed for effective work
relationships between the nonfamily CEO and the family owners. We draw on insights
from the paradox literature to better understand these tensions and how they are
managed. We performed real-time, in-depth longitudinal research into one family
firm, which appointed a nonfamily CEO, and studied tensions in the work
relationships between the nonfamily CEO and the family owners for a period of three
years. We identified tensions arising in four specific areas after the transition
from a family to a nonfamily CEO: professionalisation, collaboration, resource
allocation and role transition. We found new insights regarding how an advisory
board can provide support for the family owners in building work relationships with
the nonfamily CEO, which makes the tensions salient and possible to manage through
a paradox approach. These results inform a perspective of paradox management that
shows by whom and how the different tensions are managed, that is, through changes
in behaviour and/or through changes in the underlying subsystems of the family
firm.
C1 [van Helvert-Beugels, Judith] Windesheim Univ Appl Sci, Dutch Ctr Expertise
Family Businesses, Campus 2-6, NL-8000 GB Zwolle, Netherlands.
[Nordqvist, Mattias] Stockholm Sch Econ, Business Adm Focus Entrepreneurship,
House Innovat, Stockholm, Sweden.
[Nordqvist, Mattias] Jonkoping Univ, Jonkoping Int Business Sch, Ctr Family
Enterprise & Ownership, Jonkoping, Sweden.
[Floren, Roberto] Nyenrode Business Univ, Breukelen, Netherlands.
RP van Helvert-Beugels, J (corresponding author), Windesheim Univ Appl Sci, Dutch
Ctr Expertise Family Businesses, Campus 2-6, NL-8000 GB Zwolle, Netherlands.
EM jmc.van.helvert@windesheim.nl
OI van Helvert-Beugels, Judith/0000-0003-1251-6162
FU Taskforce for Applied Research part of the Netherlands Organisation for
Scientific Research (NWO)Netherlands Organization for Scientific
Research (NWO); Ministry of Education, Culture and ScienceMinistry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT)
FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This
research was partly funded by a research grant provided by The Taskforce
for Applied Research, which is part of the Netherlands Organisation for
Scientific Research (NWO) and is financed by the Ministry of Education,
Culture and Science.
CR Andriopoulos C, 2009, ORGAN SCI, V20, P696, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
Bennedsen M, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P647, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
Bezemer PJ, 2012, J MANAG GOV, V16, P37, DOI 10.1007/s10997-010-9128-3
Blumentritt TP, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2007.00102.x
Chang SJ, 2015, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V36, P1297, DOI 10.1002/smj.2289
Chrisman JJ, 2015, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V32, P310, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12207
Chua J.H., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P89, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00089.X
Cummings T, 2018, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V39, P2095, DOI 10.1002/smj.2792
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
DEVRIES MFRK, 1993, ORGAN DYN, V21, P59
Distelberg B, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P65, DOI 10.1177/0894486508329115
Dubois A, 2002, J BUS RES, V55, P553, DOI 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8
Dubois A, 2014, J BUS RES, V67, P1277, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.036
DYER WG, 1991, ACAD MANAGE REV, V16, P613, DOI 10.2307/258920
Emmel N., 2013, SAMPLING CHOOSING CA
Fairhurst GT, 2016, ACAD MANAG ANN, V10, P173, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162423
Farjoun M., 2016, SAGE HDB PROCESS ORG, P87
Flyvbjerg B, 2006, QUAL INQ, V12, P219, DOI 10.1177/1077800405284363
Gioia DA, 2013, ORGAN RES METHODS, V16, P15, DOI 10.1177/1094428112452151
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2007, ADMIN SCI QUART, V52, P106, DOI 10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Habbershon TG, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P451, DOI 10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00053-3
Hall A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P51, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00109.x
Hargrave TJ, 2017, ORGAN STUD, V38, P319, DOI 10.1177/0170840616640843
Huybrechts J, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P161, DOI 10.1177/0894486512469252
Ingram AE, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P161, DOI 10.1111/etap.12113
Jarzabkowski P, 2013, STRATEG ORGAN, V11, P245, DOI 10.1177/1476127013481016
Kelleci R, 2019, FAM BUS REV, V32, P31, DOI 10.1177/0894486518811222
Langley A, 1999, ACAD MANAGE REV, V24, P691, DOI 10.2307/259349
Langley A, 2011, RES METHOD STRAT MAN, V6, P201, DOI 10.1108/S1479-
8387(2011)0000006007
 Lewin K, 1946, J SOC ISSUES, V2, P34, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
Lewis MW, 2014, J APPL BEHAV SCI, V50, P127, DOI 10.1177/0021886314522322
Lewis MW, 2000, ACAD MANAGE REV, V25, P760, DOI 10.2307/259204
Lewis RB, 2007, FIELD METHOD, V19, P87, DOI 10.1177/1525822X06296589
Locke K, 2008, ORGAN SCI, V19, P907, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1080.0398
Luscher LS, 2008, ACAD MANAGE J, V51, P221, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2008.31767217
Maitlis S, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P21
Martin GP, 2013, ACAD MANAGE J, V56, P451, DOI 10.5465/amj.2010.0967
Maxwell J. A., 2012, REALIST APPROACH QUA
Mehrotra V, 2013, J FINANC ECON, V108, P840, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.011
Mehrotra V, 2011, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V35, P1121, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2011.00494.x
Miller D, 2014, J MANAGE STUD, V51, P547, DOI 10.1111/joms.12076
Minichilli A, 2014, J MANAGE STUD, V51, P1153, DOI 10.1111/joms.12095
Miron-Spektor E, 2018, ACAD MANAGE J, V61, P26, DOI 10.5465/amj.2016.0594
Moores K., 2002, LEARNING FAMILY BUSI
Mullins W, 2016, J FINANC ECON, V119, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.08.011
Pieper TM, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P301, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00101.x
POOLE MS, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P562, DOI 10.2307/258559
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), 2014, CLOS PROF FAM FACT G
Putnam LL, 2016, ACAD MANAG ANN, V10, P65, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
Raisch S, 2018, J MANAGE STUD, V55, P1507, DOI 10.1111/joms.12397
Salvato C, 2010, ENTREP REGION DEV, V22, P321, DOI 10.1080/08985621003726192
Schad J, 2018, J MANAGE STUD, V55, P1490, DOI 10.1111/joms.12398
Schad J, 2016, ACAD MANAG ANN, V10, P5, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162422
Schuman A, 2010, FAMILY BUSINESS AS PARADOX, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230291768
Sharma P, 2014, FAM BUS REV, V27, P10, DOI 10.1177/0894486513516058
Smith WK, 2014, ACAD MANAGE J, V57, P1592, DOI 10.5465/amj.2011.0932
Smith WK, 2011, ACAD MANAGE REV, V36, P381, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958
Strike VM, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P80, DOI 10.1177/0894486517735169
Strike VM, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P293, DOI 10.1177/0894486513492547
Su E, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P256, DOI 10.1177/0894486513491978
Tagiuri R., 1996, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V9, P199, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1996.00199.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1996.00199.X]
Van Helvert-Beugels J, 2018, THESIS
Van Maanen J, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P1145, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586080
VandeVen AH, 2007, ENGAGED SCHOLARSHIP
Waddington D., 2004, ESSENTIAL GUIDE QUAL, P154, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446280119
Waldkirch M, 2019, J FAMILY BUSINESS ST, DOI [10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100305., DOI
10.1016/J.JFBS.2019.100305.]
Waldkirch M, 2018, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V28, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.05.006
Yin R.K., 2017, CASE STUDY RES APPL
Zellweger T, 2014, SAGE HDB FAMILY BUSI, P648
Zellweger T, 2011, J BUS VENTURING, V26, P521, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.04.001
NR 71
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0266-2426
EI 1741-2870
J9 INT SMALL BUS J
JI Int. Small Bus. J.-Res. Entrep.
PD MAY
PY 2020
VL 38
IS 3
SI SI
BP 211
EP 242
DI 10.1177/0266242619898609
PG 32
WC Business; Management
SC Business & Economics
GA LM6FY
UT WOS:000532345900004
OA Bronze
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Lenz, R
Gluckler, J
AF Lenz, Regina
Glueckler, Johannes
TI Same same but different: regional coherence between institutions and
policies in family firm succession
SO EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Family firm succession; Spanish Basque Country; Baden-Wurttemberg;
institutional logics; policy coherence
ID PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; GOVERNMENT; OWNERSHIP; CONTEXT;
AGENDA; GROWTH; LOGICS; RULES
AB Family firms represent the backbone of regional economies in Europe. Yet, due to
demographic and societal changes, family firm succession increasingly poses a
challenge to both firm continuity and regional stability, which is why policymakers
look for appropriate ways to support family firms in their succession processes. In
pursuit of policies that fit local institutional conditions, we explore the fact
that two structurally similar European regions facing the same succession problem
have developed different policies to address it. Using the analytical framework of
institutional logics and drawing on 67 interviews with family firms and succession
experts in the Spanish Basque Country and the German region of Baden-Wurttemberg,
we find that the different policies are coherent with each region's unique
constellation of the institutional logics of business, family, and community and
thus make up distinct regional policy regimes. The paper offers a framework
applicable to other regions for making underlying normative behavioural guidelines
visible, and for more precisely assessing the relationship between institutions and
policies. It contributes to a better understanding of the regional specificity of
institutions as a base upon which place-sensitive policies can be developed, or
fundamental attempts be made to re-shape institutions by political measures.
C1 [Lenz, Regina; Glueckler, Johannes] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Geog, Econ Geog Grp,
Berliner Str 48, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
RP Lenz, R (corresponding author), Heidelberg Univ, Inst Geog, Econ Geog Grp,
Berliner Str 48, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
EM lenz@uni-heidelberg.de
RI Gluckler, Johannes/K-3807-2018
OI Gluckler, Johannes/0000-0002-2507-1556
FU German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)German
Research Foundation (DFG)
FX This research has been funded by the German Research Foundation
(Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). We are grateful to the Basque
Institute of Competitiveness (Orkestra) for hosting our field stages and
for facilitating access to experts in the Basque Country. We extend our
 gratitude to the regional chambers of industry and commerce, business
associations and regional governments in both study regions, as well as
to the family firms for taking part in this study.
CR Albertini M, 2007, J EUR SOC POLICY, V17, P319, DOI 10.1177/0958928707081068
Albertos Puebla J. M., 2014, GEOGRAFIA CRISIS EC
Alonso J. M., 2016, EL MUNDO
ARANCEGUI MN, 2012, NEW HORIZ REG SCI, P99
Basco R, 2017, BRQ-BUS RES Q, V20, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.brq.2016.07.001
Basco R, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.04.004
Basco R, 2013, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V4, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.12.003
Bathelt H, 2018, KNOWL SPACE, V13, P247, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_12
Bau M, 2019, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V43, P360, DOI 10.1177/1042258718796089
BDI, 2014, UNT
Benner M, 2017, ECONOMIES, V5, DOI 10.3390/economies5030026
Berrone P, 2010, ADMIN SCI QUART, V55, P82, DOI 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.82
Bethge I., 2013, BASEL 3 FOLGEN MITTE
Block J, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.08.005
Bosma N, 2018, SMALL BUS ECON, V51, P483, DOI 10.1007/s11187-018-0012-x
Boyer R, 2005, EVOL INST ECON REV, V2, P43
Chrisman JJ, 2008, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V32, P935, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2008.00264.x
Christensen Zaracho N., 2008, MANUAL EMPRESA FAMIL
Chua J. H. J. J., 1999, ENTREPRENEURSHIP THE, V23, P19, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879902300402
Cooke P., 1998, ASS EC FIRMS REGIONS
Crescenzi R, 2016, J REGIONAL SCI, V56, P555, DOI 10.1111/jors.12264
Dekker J, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V136, P293, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2516-x
Dellepiane-Avellaneda S, 2010, BRIT J POLIT SCI, V40, P195, DOI
10.1017/S0007123409990287
Duh M., 2012, ENTREPRENEURSHIP GEN, P209
Dunford M, 2016, AREA DEV POLICY, V1, P1, DOI 10.1080/23792949.2016.1158621
Eisenhardt KM, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P25, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P532, DOI 10.2307/258557
El Foro de Empresa Familiar, 2008, EMPR FAM
European Commission, 2009, OV FAM BUS REL ISS R
Fairclough S, 2013, RES SOCIOL ORGAN-RES, V39, P63, DOI 10.1108/S0733-
558X(2013)0039A&B016
Farrell H, 2018, KNOWL SPACE, V13, P23, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_2
Olmos MF, 2011, APPL ECON PERSPECT P, V33, P384, DOI 10.1093/aepp/ppr017
Friedland R., 1991, BRINGING SOC BACK SY, P232
Fritsch M, 2018, REG STUD, V52, P1360, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2017.1388914
Gertler MS, 2010, REG STUD, V44, P1, DOI 10.1080/00343400903389979
Gluckler J, 2020, GROWTH CHANGE, V51, P234, DOI 10.1111/grow.12362
Gluckler J, 2020, EUR PLAN STUD, V28, P1554, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2019.1693981
Gluckler J, 2018, KNOWL SPACE, V13, P111, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_6
Gluckler J, 2016, INVESTIG REG, P255
Gottschalk S, 2017, VOLKSWIRTSCHAFTLICHE
Greenwood R, 2010, ORGAN SCI, V21, P521, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1090.0453
Handke M., 2011, HAUSBANKBEZIEHUNG IN
HELMKE G, 2004, PERSPECTIVES POLITIC, V0002
Hess A, 2018, KNOWL SPACE, V13, P91, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_5
Iammarino S, 2019, J ECON GEOGR, V19, P273, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lby021
Isusi I., 2008, OVERVIEW FAMILY BUSI
Jaskiewicz P, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P781, DOI 10.1111/etap.12146
Jimenez F, 2012, LEX LOCALIS, V10, P363, DOI 10.4335/10.4363-381(2012)
Jung R, 2015, ARCHAEOL AUSTRIACA, P53, DOI 10.1553/archaeologia99s53
Kay R., 2013, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG
Kay R., 2018, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG
Lenz R, 2020, Z WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGR, V64, P58, DOI 10.1515/zfw-2019-0019
 Marquis C, 2009, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V29, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.001
MARTIN R., 2000, COMPANION EC GEOGRAP, P77
May PJ, 2015, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V30, P277, DOI 10.1177/0952076714561505
Miller D, 2017, J BUS VENTURING, V32, P674, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.08.001
Miller D, 2011, J MANAGE STUD, V48, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00896.x
Moodysson J, 2016, IND INNOV, V23, P448, DOI 10.1080/13662716.2016.1167014
MOSO M., 2002, J TECHNOLOGY TRANSFE, V27, P61, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1013148620724
Pike A, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P185, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsu030
Purdy JM, 2010, EUR J INT MANAG, V4, P234, DOI 10.1504/EJIM.2010.033002
Radiker S., 2019, ANAL QUALITATIVER DA
RAMIREZ RG, 1984, INVEST CLIN, V25, P213
Reay T, 2016, STRATEG ORGAN, V14, P441, DOI 10.1177/1476127015589981
Reay T, 2015, FAM BUS REV, V28, P292, DOI 10.1177/0894486515577513
Rodriguez-Pose A, 2018, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V11, P189, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsx024
Rodriguez-Pose A, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P673, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu023
Rodriguez-Pose A, 2013, REG STUD, V47, P1034, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
Sanchez-Cuenca I., 2010, VIOLENT NONSTATE ACT, P69
Scholes L, 2008, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V15, P8, DOI 10.1108/14626000810850829
Schwenker B., 2013, EUROPES HIDDEN POTEN
Sharma P., 2014, SAGE HDB FAMILY BUSI, P1
Shen N, 2017, J CORP FINANC, V45, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.04.012
Soleimanof S, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P32, DOI 10.1177/0894486517736446
Sorenson RL, 2013, J MANAG SPIRITUAL RE, V10, P117, DOI
10.1080/14766086.2012.758050
Stamm I., 2011, DOING SUCCESSION EUR, P243
Storper M., 2015, RISE FALL URBAN EC L
Stough R, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.11.002
Streeck W., 2005, CONTINUITY I CHANGE
Thornton P., 2012, I LOGICS PERSPECTIVE
Tomaney J, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P131, DOI 10.1177/0309132513493385
Zahra SA, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P363, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2004.00051.x
NR 82
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 6
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0965-4313
EI 1469-5944
J9 EUR PLAN STUD
JI Eur. Plan. Stud.
PD MAR 4
PY 2021
VL 29
IS 3
BP 536
EP 555
DI 10.1080/09654313.2020.1757041
EA APR 2020
PG 20
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban
Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration;
Urban Studies
GA QK4NI
UT WOS:000531943000001
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Mair, S
Rombach, M
AF Mair, S.
Rombach, M.
TI Taking the helm at the family operation under the watchful eye of the
predecessor: Succession in European horticulture and agriculture
SO EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE instrumental case study; inductive qualitative content analysis;
relational conflicts; skills and knowledge requirements
ID BUSINESS SUCCESSION; FARM SUCCESSION; WORK; DETERMINANTS; CONSTRUCTION;
GENERATIONS; COMMITMENT; DAUGHTERS; FRAMEWORK; RESOURCE
AB The present case study investigated the intra family succession process in
agricultural and horticultural enterprises from a successor perspective. The study
shows educational and relational similarities in different European countries. The
study follows a qualitative research approach and aims to provide a detailed
picture of succession processes, comparing managers with different areas of
specialization. The results show that a successful succession process requires
organizational and analytical skills, advanced personal skills and attitudes such
as patience, calm, and self-confidence, as well as knowledge-based skills in
communication, management, finance, and law on the part of all involved. In the
process, successors must cope with relational conflicts such as sibling rivalry or
shadows of the previous generation. Open communication, physical distance, role
definition and the acknowledgement of their experience by the predecessor and, if
necessary, consulting can support addressing these issues. The relationship
findings corroborate work-family border theory.
C1 [Mair, S.] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Grp Econ Hort & Landscaping, Alte Akad 16, D-
85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany.
[Rombach, M.] Lincoln Univ, Land Management & Syst, POB 85084, Christchurch
7647, New Zealand.
RP Mair, S (corresponding author), Tech Univ Munich, Chair Grp Econ Hort &
Landscaping, Alte Akad 16, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany.
EM stefan.mair@tum.de
FU European CommissionEuropean CommissionEuropean Commission Joint Research
Centre
FX The authors gratefully acknowledge funding of the European Commission
and the support of all participants and partners of the Erasmus+ project
"Farm-Success-2015-1-DE02-KA202-002390" who contributed to data
collection.
CR Avloniti A, 2014, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V10, P661, DOI 10.1007/s11365-013-0271-6
Barach J.A., 1995, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V8, P131, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1995.00131.X
Barach J. A., 1988, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V26, P49
Barnard F.L., 2016, AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEM, DOI [10.4324/9781315709420, DOI
10.4324/9781315709420]
Bennett R., 2002, J VOCATIONAL ED TRAI, V54, P457, DOI [DOI
10.1080/13636820200200209, 10.1080/13636820200200209]
Bizri R, 2016, INT J ENTREP BEHAV R, V22, P133, DOI 10.1108/IJEBR-01-2015-0020
Bjuggren PO, 2014, EUR J LAW ECON, V38, P211, DOI 10.1007/s10657-012-9331-6
Boland M., 2001, INT FOOD AGRIBUS MAN, V4, P225, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1096-
7508(01)00083-0
Boyar SL, 2005, J BUS RES, V58, P919, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.005
Brandth B, 2013, SOCIOL RURALIS, V53, P95, DOI 10.1111/soru.12003
Burton RJF, 2015, SOCIOL RURALIS, V55, P155, DOI 10.1111/soru.12080
 BUSHMAN BS, 2018, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V8, DOI DOI 10.24310/EJFBEJFB.V8I1.4939
Byrne J, 2019, EUR MANAG REV, V16, P579, DOI 10.1111/emre.12298
Cadieux L., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P17, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00017.X
Calabro A, 2018, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V39, P2014, DOI 10.1002/smj.2760
Casper WJ, 2018, J APPL PSYCHOL, V103, P182, DOI 10.1037/apl0000259
Chalus-Sauvannet MC, 2016, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V54, P714, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12167
Chirico F, 2010, INT SMALL BUS J, V28, P487, DOI 10.1177/0266242610370402
Chiswell HM, 2018, SOCIOL RURALIS, V58, P104, DOI 10.1111/soru.12138
Chiswell HM, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P300, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12131
Chua J.H., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P89, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00089.X
Clark SC, 2000, HUM RELAT, V53, P747, DOI 10.1177/0018726700536001
Collins J.D., 2016, J SMALL BUS STRATEGY, V26, P51
Corbin J, 2003, QUAL INQ, V9, P335, DOI 10.1177/1077800403009003001
Dalpiaz E, 2014, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V38, P1375, DOI 10.1111/etap.12129
Davis JH, 2010, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V34, P1093, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2010.00415.x
Davis P. S., 1999, FAM BUS REV, V12, P311, DOI [10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9,
DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1999.00311.X, 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00311.x.]
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
Dhaenens AJ, 2018, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V28, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.05.005
Dickson-Swift V, 2009, QUAL RES, V9, P61, DOI 10.1177/1468794108098031
Dudek M, 2016, STUD AGRIC ECON, V118, P61, DOI 10.7896/j.1613
Eddleston KA, 2007, J BUS VENTURING, V22, P545, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.06.004
Fahed-Sreih J., 2016, FATHER DAUGHTER SUCC, P67
Faraudello A., 2018, J MODERN ACCOUNTING, V14, P70, DOI [10.17265/1548-
6583/2018.02.003., DOI 10.17265/1548-6583/2018.02.003]
Fleming E., 2018, P FOOD SYST DYN, P321
Friedman S. D., 1991, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V4, P3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1991.00003.X
Gagne M, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P292, DOI 10.1177/0894486511410688
Gersick K. E., 1997, GENERATION GENERATIO
Getz D., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P89, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00089.X
Gherardi S, 2016, INT J GEND ENTREP, V8, P28, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-11-2014-0044
Greenhaus JH, 2003, J VOCAT BEHAV, V63, P510, DOI 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00042-8
Handler W.C., 1989, THESIS
Harrington B., 2018, ACAD MANAG P, V2018, P15364, DOI [10.5465/AMBPP.2018.18.,
DOI 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.18]
Harvey M., 1995, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V8, P3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1995.00003.X
Howley P., 2012, Journal of Agricultural Science (Toronto), V4, P171, DOI
10.5539/jas.v4n6p171
Cabrera-Suarez MK, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P178, DOI 10.1177/0894486518776867
Kidwell RE, 2018, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V28, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.05.002
Klein S.B., 2000, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, VXIII, P157, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2000.00157.X
Kreiner GE, 2009, ACAD MANAGE J, V52, P704, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669916
Lansberg I., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P119, DOI [10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00011-9, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x]
Lansberg I., 1999, SUCCEEDING GENERATIO
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Lee KS, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P657
Leiss G, 2018, J FAM BUS MANAG, V8, P75, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-09-2017-0025
Leonard B., 2017, International Journal of Agricultural Management, V6, P4
Lobley M, 2010, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V1, P49, DOI 10.5304/jafscd.2010.011.009
Lockamy A, 2016, J FAM BUS MANAG, V6, P64, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-01-2015-0002
 Lussier R. N., 2009, INT ENTREPRENEURSHIP, V5, P395, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11365-009-
0109-4
Mair S., 2018, International Journal on Food System Dynamics, V9, P279
Michel A, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.10.005
Mugera A. W., 2005, INT FOOD AGRIBUS MAN, V8, P79
Nelson T, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1177/0894486517715390
Nilson H, 2018, ROUTL ADV MANAG BUS, P99
Nuthall PL, 2017, J AGRIC EDUC EXT, V23, P39, DOI 10.1080/1389224X.2016.1200992
Potter C, 1996, SOCIOL RURALIS, V36, P286, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
9523.1996.tb00023.x
Riley M, 2016, SOCIOL RURALIS, V56, P96, DOI 10.1111/soru.12063
Rousseau M.B., 2019, RELATIONSHIP CONFLIC
Samei H, 2015, INT J ENTREP BEHAV R, V21, P731, DOI 10.1108/IJEBR-02-2015-0043
SANDELOWSKI M, 1994, RES NURS HEALTH, V17, P479, DOI 10.1002/nur.4770170611
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P., 2004, FAM BUS REV, V17, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2004.00001.X
Skouby D., 2018, J AGRIBUSINESS, V36, P41
Stake R.E., 1995, ART CASE STUDY RES
Steiger TL, 2011, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V2, P89, DOI 10.5304/jafscd.2012.022.012
Sterns J. A., 1998, INT FOOD AGRIBUS MAN, V1, P311, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1096-
7508(99)80002-0
Strike VM, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P80, DOI 10.1177/0894486517735169
Sumane S, 2018, J RURAL STUD, V59, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020
Tagiuri R., 1992, FAM BUS REV, V5, P43, DOI [10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9, DOI
10.1111/J.1741-6248.1992.00043.X, 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1992.00043.x]
Umans I, 2020, SMALL BUS ECON, V54, P189, DOI 10.1007/s11187-018-0078-5
Vera CF, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00051.x
Waldkirch M, 2018, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V28, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.05.006
Welter F., 2017, WOMEN ENTREPRENEURSH
Zhong Z, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P2266, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.184
NR 83
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU INT SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE-ISHS
PI LEUVEN
PA PO BOX 500, LEUVEN, 3001, BELGIUM
SN 1611-4426
EI 1611-4434
J9 EUR J HORTIC SCI
JI Eur. J. Hortic. Sci.
PD APR
PY 2020
VL 85
IS 2
BP 123
EP 132
DI 10.17660/eJHS.2020/85.2.7
PG 10
WC Horticulture
SC Agriculture
GA LM2MS
UT WOS:000532087000007
OA Bronze
DA 2021-03-01
ER
PT J
AU Zhong, ZK
Zhang, XY
Wang, X
Fu, SY
Wu, SJ
Lu, XQ
Ren, CJ
Han, XH
Yang, GH
AF Zhong, Zekun
Zhang, Xinyi
Wang, Xing
Fu, Shuyue
Wu, Shaojun
Lu, Xuqiao
Ren, Chengjie
Han, Xinhui
Yang, Gaihe
TI Soil bacteria and fungi respond differently to plant diversity and plant
family composition during the secondary succession of abandoned farmland
on the Loess Plateau, China
SO PLANT AND SOIL
LA English
DT Article
DE Soil bacteria and fungi; Plant-microbial diversity; Plant families;
Secondary succession; Soil nutrients
ID MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; SPECIES-DIVERSITY; VEGETATION SUCCESSION;
EXTRACTION METHOD; RHIZOSPHERE; NITROGEN; DRIVERS; SEQUENCES; GRADIENT;
IDENTITY
AB Aims This study aimed to determine the responses of soil bacteria and fungi to
plant species diversity and plant family composition (PFC) following secondary
succession on former farmland (FL). Methods Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA and ITS
genes was used to determine soil microbial communities along a chronosequence of FL
left abandoned for 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 years on the Loess Plateau. Soil
properties, plant diversity, and PFC were also investigated. Results Fungal
communities were dominated by Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Fungal diversity and
Ascomycota abundance increased with time, while Basidiomycota abundance decreased.
The fungal diversity and dominant phyla were related to the increasing levels of
plant species diversity and evenness with succession. Bacterial diversity first
increased and then decreased as succession proceeded, peaking at 30 years.
Bacterial communities transitioned from Actinobacteria to Proteobacteria dominance
during the first 30 years, after which Actinobacteria was dominant. Plant family
composition exerted indirect effects on the diversity and dominant phyla of
bacterial communities, mainly through direct effects on soil organic carbon and
total nitrogen content. Bacterial diversity and Proteobacteria abundance were
higher at Leguminosae- and Gramineae-dominant succession stages, but lower in
Compositae-dominant plots; Actinobacteria showed the opposite result. Conclusions
Plant species diversity and evenness might be the key drivers for shaping fungal
communities, but bacteria are influenced more by changes in PFC and abiotic soil
nutrient levels during succession.
C1 [Zhong, Zekun; Zhang, Xinyi; Wang, Xing; Fu, Shuyue; Wu, Shaojun; Lu, Xuqiao;
Ren, Chengjie; Han, Xinhui; Yang, Gaihe] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Agron, Yangling
712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
[Zhong, Zekun; Zhang, Xinyi; Wang, Xing; Fu, Shuyue; Wu, Shaojun; Lu, Xuqiao;
Ren, Chengjie; Han, Xinhui; Yang, Gaihe] Res Ctr Recycle Agr Engn & Technol Shaanxi
Prov, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
RP Ren, CJ (corresponding author), Res Ctr Recycle Agr Engn & Technol Shaanxi Prov,
Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
EM Rencj1991@nwafu.edu.cn
CR Ali HE, 2017, PLANT SOIL, V411, P359, DOI 10.1007/s11104-016-3036-5
Bazzaz FA, 1996, PLANTS CHANGING ENV
Bezemer TM, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P893, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01158.x
Biddle JF, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P10583, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0709942105
Braun-Blanquet J., 1964, PFLANZENSOZIOLOGIE G
Bremner JM, 1982, AGRONOMY, V9, P595, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGR0NM0N0GR9.2.2ED.C31
BROOKES PC, 1984, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V16, P169, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(84)90108-1
BROOKES PC, 1985, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V17, P837, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0
Burns JH, 2015, AOB PLANTS, V7, DOI 10.1093/aobpla/plv030
Caporaso JG, 2010, NAT METHODS, V7, P335, DOI 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
Carvalhais LC, 2019, RHIZOSPHERE-NETH, V9, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.rhisph.2018.10.002
Cassman NA, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep23680
Chen YL, 2016, J BIOGEOGR, V43, P2027, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12806
Chon SU, 2010, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V30, P349, DOI 10.1051/agro/2009027
Clemmensen KE, 2013, SCIENCE, V339, P1615, DOI 10.1126/science.1231923
Cline LC, 2015, ECOLOGY, V96, P3374, DOI 10.1890/15-0184.1
Cole JR, 2005, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V33, pD294, DOI 10.1093/nar/gki038
D'Odorico P, 2012, ECOHYDROLOGY, V5, P520, DOI 10.1002/eco.259
Dassen S, 2017, MOL ECOL, V26, P4085, DOI 10.1111/mec.14175
Deng L, 2019, GEODERMA, V353, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.037
Edgar RC, 2013, NAT METHODS, V10, P996, DOI [10.1038/NMETH.2604,
10.1038/nmeth.2604]
Eisenhauer N, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024087
Hannula SE, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V194, P784, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04089.x
He XY, 2008, PLANT SOIL, V307, P123, DOI 10.1007/s11104-008-9590-8
Hollister EB, 2010, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V42, P1816, DOI
10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.06.022
Jiang JP, 2009, PEDOSPHERE, V19, P735, DOI 10.1016/S1002-0160(09)60169-7
Kennedy N, 2004, ENVIRON MICROBIOL, V6, P1070, DOI 10.1111/j.1462-
2920.2004.00638.x
Kielak A, 2008, FEMS MICROBIOL ECOL, V63, P372, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-
6941.2007.00428.x
Kotze E, 2017, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V107, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10705-017-9832-3
Li YS, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V124, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2007.08.007
Loranger-Merciris G, 2006, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V38, P2336, DOI
10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.02.009
Mahaming AR, 2009, APPL SOIL ECOL, V41, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.11.003
Marshall CB, 2011, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V43, P78, DOI
10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.016
Millard P, 2010, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V88, P147, DOI 10.1007/s10705-009-9314-3
Mukherjee PK, 2014, PLOS PATHOG, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003996
NELSON DW, 1982, METHODS SOIL ANAL, P101
PARKINSON JA, 1975, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/00103627509366539
Price MN, 2009, MOL BIOL EVOL, V26, P1641, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msp077
Prober SM, 2015, ECOL LETT, V18, P85, DOI 10.1111/ele.12381
Ren CJ, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V376, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.004
Rezacova V, 2018, PLANT SOIL, V425, P441, DOI 10.1007/s11104-018-3606-9
Sanchez G., 2013, PLS PATH MODELING R
Schloss PD, 2009, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V75, P7537, DOI 10.1128/AEM.01541-09
Siles JA, 2016, MICROB ECOL, V72, P207, DOI 10.1007/s00248-016-0748-2
Singh BK, 2004, TRENDS MICROBIOL, V12, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.008
Sugiyama Shu-ichi, 2008, Grassland Science, V54, P117, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-
697X.2008.00113.x
van der Heijden MGA, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P296, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-
0248.2007.01139.x
van der Wal A, 2006, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V38, P51, DOI
10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.04.017
VANCE ED, 1987, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V19, P703, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
 Venterink HO, 2011, PLANT SOIL, V347, P137, DOI 10.1007/s11104-011-0834-7
Wardle DA, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P870, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00931.x
Wei X, 2013, J ARID ENVIRON, V88, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.09.003
Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, 2015, ECOL MONOGR, V85, P133, DOI 10.1890/14-0777.1
Zhang C, 2016, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V97, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.02.013
Zhang W, 2018, ECOL ENG, V122, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.07.031
Zhong ZK, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9100598
NR 56
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 11
U2 27
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0032-079X
EI 1573-5036
J9 PLANT SOIL
JI Plant Soil
PD MAR
PY 2020
VL 448
IS 1-2
BP 183
EP 200
DI 10.1007/s11104-019-04415-0
PG 18
WC Agronomy; Plant Sciences; Soil Science
SC Agriculture; Plant Sciences
GA LE0QC
UT WOS:000526428600012
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Gimenez, EL
Novo, JA
AF Gimenez, Eduardo L.
Novo, Jose Antonio
TI A Theory of Succession in Family Firms
SO JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND ECONOMIC ISSUES
LA English
DT Article
DE Family firm; Succession; Professionalisation; Retirement; Amenity
Potential
ID BUSINESS SUCCESSION; GAME-THEORY; OWNERSHIP; CEO; PERFORMANCE;
MANAGEMENT; CHOOSE; CHOICE
AB Succession is one of the most important issues for the most common type of
firms. The literature on family firm succession has straggled as a part of
different paradigms, setting forth stylized facts, informal arguments and
observations. In this paper, we present a theory of family firm succession that
unifies and synthesizes scattered and dispersed contributions depicted in family
business research; specifically, the key role of the training activity in preparing
the potential candidate, the importance of amenity potentials that is inherent to
family businesses, the incumbent's reluctance to step aside, the underperforming
succession, the role of trust in the succession process, and the barriers to a
"non-family" succession. Within a simple microeconomics framework, we find that
these different facts and arguments spelt out in the literature are reflections of
the same fundamental economic trade-off between proficiency (skills) and honesty
(incentives) when choosing among potential successors.
C1 [Gimenez, Eduardo L.] Univ Vigo, Dept Fundamentos Anal Econ & Hist, Fac CC Econ
& Empresariais, E-36310 Vigo, Spain.
[Gimenez, Eduardo L.] Univ Vigo, Inst Econ, Fac CC Econ & Empresariais, E-36310
Vigo, Spain.
[Novo, Jose Antonio] Univ A Coruna, Dept Econ, Fac Econ & Empresa, La Coruna
15071, Spain.
RP Gimenez, EL (corresponding author), Univ Vigo, Dept Fundamentos Anal Econ &
Hist, Fac CC Econ & Empresariais, E-36310 Vigo, Spain.; Gimenez, EL (corresponding
author), Univ Vigo, Inst Econ, Fac CC Econ & Empresariais, E-36310 Vigo, Spain.
EM egimenez@uvigo.es; janp@udc.es
RI Gimenez, Eduardo L./L-3361-2014
OI Gimenez, Eduardo L./0000-0002-3089-854X; Novo-Peteiro,
Jose/0000-0003-4098-3198
CR Agrawal A, 2006, J CORP FINANC, V12, P619, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.04.005
Anderson RC, 2009, J FINANC ECON, V92, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.04.006
[Anonymous], 2014, ECONOMIST
Bau M, 2013, LANDSCAPE OF FAMILY BUSINESS, P167
Becker GS., 1981, TREATISE FAMILY
Bennedsen M, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P647, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
Bhattacharya U., 2010, 22939 MPRA
Bhaumik SK, 2010, J ECON SURV, V24, P705, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00608.x
Bjuggren P., 2001, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V14, P11, DOI [DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2001.00011.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00011.X]
Bloom N, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P1351, DOI 10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1351
Blumentritt T, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P51, DOI 10.1177/0894486512447811
Blumentritt TP, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2007.00102.x
Blumentritt TP, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P1261, DOI 10.1111/etap.12245
Burkart M, 2003, J FINANC, V58, P2167, DOI 10.1111/1540-6261.00601
Cabrera-Suarez K., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P37, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2001.00037.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00037.X]
Cannella AA, 2001, ACAD MANAGE J, V44, P252, DOI 10.2307/3069454
Chami R., 2001, WORKING PAPERS, VWP/01/70, DOI [10.5089/9781451849158.001, DOI
10.5089/9781451849158.001]
Chrisman J. J., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V11, P19, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1998.00019.X]
Cucculelli M, 2008, J CORP FINANC, V14, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.11.001
DALTON DR, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P749, DOI 10.2307/256235
Davis JH, 1997, ACAD MANAGE REV, V22, P20, DOI 10.2307/259223
DEMSETZ H, 1985, J POLIT ECON, V93, P1155, DOI 10.1086/261354
DEVRIES MFRK, 1993, ORGAN DYN, V21, P59
Dyer WG., 1989, FAM BUS REV, V2, P221, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00221.x,
DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1989.00221.X]
Eklund J, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V41, P419, DOI 10.1007/s11187-012-9432-1
FRIEDMAN SD, 1995, HUM RESOURCE MANAGE, V34, P141, DOI 10.1002/hrm.3930340109
HANDLER W. C., 1994, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V7, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00133.X
Handler W.C., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P361, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1988.00361.X
Huson MR, 2004, J FINANC ECON, V74, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.08.002
Isakov D, 2014, J BANK FINANC, V41, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.012
Johnson S, 2000, AM ECON REV, V90, P22, DOI 10.1257/aer.90.2.22
KANDEL E, 1992, J POLIT ECON, V100, P801, DOI 10.1086/261840
Kimhi A, 1997, SMALL BUS ECON, V9, P309, DOI 10.1023/A:1007987731337
Klein S. B., 2007, ELECT J FAMILY BUSIN, V1, P19
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Lee KS, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P657
 LEVINSON H, 1974, HARVARD BUS REV, V52, P53
Mathews T, 2015, SMALL BUS ECON, V45, P15, DOI 10.1007/s11187-015-9628-2
Merchant P, 2018, J FAM ECON ISS, V39, P177, DOI 10.1007/s10834-017-9562-3
Michael-Tsabari N, 2015, FAM BUS REV, V28, P26, DOI 10.1177/0894486513497506
Nordqvist M, 2012, INT SMALL BUS J, V30, P24, DOI 10.1177/0266242611407413
Pagano M, 1998, Q J ECON, V113, P187, DOI 10.1162/003355398555568
Parker SC, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P1241, DOI 10.1111/etap.12242
Perez-Gonzalez F, 2006, AM ECON REV, V96, P1559, DOI 10.1257/aer.96.5.1559
Puri M, 2013, J ECON MANAGE STRAT, V22, P423, DOI 10.1111/jems.12013
Schulze W.S., 2002, MANAGERIAL DECISION, V23, P247, DOI [10.1002/mde.1064, DOI
10.1002/MDE.1064]
Sharma P., 2001, J ENTREPRENEURSHIP T, V26, P17, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2008.00118.x
Shen W, 2002, ACAD MANAGE J, V45, P717, DOI 10.2307/3069306
SHEPHERD DA, 2000, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V24, P25, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870002400402
Smith B., 1999, J CORP FINANC, V5, P341, DOI [10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00010-3, DOI
10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00010-3]
Song FH, 2006, J FINANC, V61, P1845, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00891.x
Villalonga B, 2006, J FINANC ECON, V80, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
Zellweger T., 2018, MANAGING FAMILY BUSI
NR 53
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 16
PU SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
PI CHAM
PA GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND
SN 1058-0476
EI 1573-3475
J9 J FAM ECON ISS
JI J. Fam. Econ. Iss.
PD MAR
PY 2020
VL 41
IS 1
SI SI
BP 96
EP 120
DI 10.1007/s10834-019-09646-y
PG 25
WC Economics; Family Studies
SC Business & Economics; Family Studies
GA KT6YI
UT WOS:000519160600007
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Barbosa, RA
Domingues, CHD
da Silva, MC
Foguesatto, CR
Pereira, MD
Gimenes, RMT
Borges, JAR
AF Barbosa, Roseli Azambuja
de Faria Domingues, Carla Heloisa
 da Silva, Marcelo Correa
Foguesatto, Cristian Rogerio
Pereira, Mariana de Aragao
Toesca Gimenes, Regio Marcio
Rossi Borges, Joao Augusto
TI Using Q-methodology to identify rural women's viewpoint on succession of
family farms
SO LAND USE POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Agriculture; Culture; Farm transfer; Gender; Rural migration
ID SELECTIVE MIGRATION; YOUNG FARMERS; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; GENDER;
YOUTH; PERSPECTIVES; AGRICULTURE; INTENTIONS; CALAKMUL
AB In the world, the majority of farms are family-based. However, migration of
young people from rural to urban areas, and a lack of farm successors negatively
impact on the continuity of family farming. The pattern of migration is unbalanced
in terms of gender: women are more likely to leave rural areas than men, which has
negative consequences for rural development. The objective of this study was to
identify rural women's viewpoint about the elements that would facilitate them to
eventually take over the family farm. Q-methodology was used to identify rural
women's viewpoints. Data were collected individually from 28 women, face-to-face
with each woman, using a transportable board game to enable friendlier dynamics.
Our findings showed five women's viewpoints: rural attractiveness, family support,
recognition, working and living conditions, and financial autonomy. The
identification of these different viewpoints could provide insights that can be
used to design public and private interventions aimed to favor female heirs to take
over the family farm.
C1 [Barbosa, Roseli Azambuja; de Faria Domingues, Carla Heloisa; da Silva, Marcelo
Correa; Toesca Gimenes, Regio Marcio; Rossi Borges, Joao Augusto] Fed Univ Grande
Dourados, Agribusiness Program, Rodovia Dourados Itahum,Km 12, Dourados, MS,
Brazil.
[Foguesatto, Cristian Rogerio] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Ave Bento Goncalves
7712, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
[Pereira, Mariana de Aragao] Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av Radio Maia 830, Campo
Grande, MS, Brazil.
RP Borges, JAR (corresponding author), Fed Univ Grande Dourados, Agribusiness
Program, Rodovia Dourados Itahum,Km 12, Dourados, MS, Brazil.
EM roseliazambuja@ufgd.edu.br; carlafariadomingues@hotmail.com;
marcelo-correadasilva@hotmail.com; cristian_rogeriof@hotmail.com;
mariana.pereira@embrapa.br; regiogimenes@ufgd.edu.br;
joaoborges@ufgd.edu.br
RI Silva, Marcelo/AAE-4532-2021; Borges, Joao Augusto Rossi/F-4306-2016
OI Borges, Joao Augusto Rossi/0000-0002-2580-051X; Correa da Silva,
Marcelo/0000-0002-7599-1967
FU National Council for Scientific and Technological Development CNPq,
BrazilNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development
(CNPq) [305082/2018-3]
FX The last author thanks the National Council for Scientific and
Technological Development CNPq, Brazil for the research grant number
305082/2018-3.
CR Addams H., 2000, SOCIAL DISCOURSE ENV
Alexander KS, 2018, AGR SYST, V160, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.018
Alston M, 2004, AGR HUM VALUES, V21, P37, DOI 10.1023/B:AHUM.0000014019.84085.59
Bednarikova Z, 2016, J RURAL STUD, V45, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.006
Bertoni D., 2016, PERSPECT AGR VET SCI, V43, P1
Bertoni D, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V57, P739, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.002
Bjarnason T, 2006, J RURAL STUD, V22, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.09.004
Brown S. R., 1980, POLITICAL SUBJECTIVI
 Cavicchioli D, 2018, J RURAL STUD, V61, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.06.002
Chouinard H.H., 2006, HETEROGENEOUS MOTIVA
Corbett M., 2005, CANADIAN J ED, P52, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1602153, 10.2307/1602153]
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
FAIRWEATHER JR, 1994, AGR SYST, V44, P181, DOI 10.1016/0308-521X(94)90160-H
Fischer T., 2014, GENDER RURAL MIGRATI, P61
Foguesatto CR, 2016, REV PARANAENSE DESEN, V37, P15
Garasky S, 2002, SOC SCI RES, V31, P409, DOI 10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00007-8
Gasson Ruth., 1993, FARM FAMILY BUSINESS
Gongora R, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V85, P183, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.052
Graeub BE, 2016, WORLD DEV, V87, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.012
Greiner R, 2009, AGR SYST, V99, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.10.003
Grubbstrom A, 2012, J HIST GEOGR, V38, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.jhg.2012.03.001
Heggem R, 2014, J RURAL STUD, V34, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.03.002
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia a Estatfstica-IBGE, 2017, DAD POP BRAS
Johansson M, 2016, J RURAL STUD, V43, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.04.002
Kaberis N, 2013, SOCIOL RURALIS, V53, P74, DOI 10.1111/soru.12001
Leibert T, 2016, J RURAL STUD, V43, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.004
Lima S.M.V., 2013, JUVENTUDE RURAL POLI
Lobley M, 2010, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V1, P49, DOI 10.5304/jafscd.2010.011.009
Luhrs DE, 2016, GENDER PLACE CULT, V23, P1078, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2015.1090405
Martelo EZ, 1996, LAT AM PERSPECT, V23, P118, DOI 10.1177/0094582X9602300108
Maybery D, 2005, J ECON PSYCHOL, V26, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2003.10.001
McKeown B., 1988, Q METHODOLOGY
Mihi-Ramirez A, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V109, P522, DOI
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.500
Morais M, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V71, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.002
Morais M, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V68, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.024
Pereira MA, 2016, AGR SYST, V144, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.01.004
Pini B, 2007, LOCAL GOV STUD, V33, P427, DOI 10.1080/03003930701289638
Previte J, 2007, SOCIOL RURALIS, V47, P135, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00433.x
Price L, 2012, SOCIOL RURALIS, V52, P353, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00568.x
Radel C, 2012, GENDER PLACE CULT, V19, P61, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2011.617905
Radel C, 2011, LAT AM RES REV, V46, P29
Rerat P, 2014, J RURAL STUD, V35, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.009
Robbins P, 2000, PROF GEOGR, V52, P636, DOI 10.1111/0033-0124.00252
Rode M., 2014, THESIS
Saugeres L, 2002, WOMEN STUD INT FORUM, V25, P641, DOI 10.1016/S0277-
5395(02)00342-4
Schall D, 2018, J RURAL STUD, V60, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.003
Schmolck P., 2002, PQ METHOD MANUAL, V2
Silvasti T, 2003, SOCIOL RURALIS, V43, P154, DOI 10.1111/1467-9523.00236
Stenner P., 2004, Z TODD B
Stockdale A, 2006, J RURAL STUD, V22, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.11.001
Suess-Reyes J, 2016, J RURAL STUD, V47, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.008
Thissen F, 2010, J RURAL STUD, V26, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.05.001
Viira AH, 2014, GER J AGR ECON, V63, P46
Walder P, 2018, ECOL ECON, V143, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.018
Watts S., 2012, DOING Q METHODOLOGIC
Wiest K., 2013, SEMIGRA SELECTIVE MI
Wilson P, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V30, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.03.006
Zou BL, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V77, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.001
NR 58
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 7
U2 10
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-8377
EI 1873-5754
J9 LAND USE POLICY
JI Land Use Pol.
PD MAR
PY 2020
VL 92
AR 104489
DI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104489
PG 9
WC Environmental Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA KR5MQ
UT WOS:000517662900037
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Nazer, JR
Llorca-Jana, M
AF Nazer, Juan Ricardo
Llorca-Jana, Manuel
TI Succession in large nineteenth-century Chilean family businesses
SO BUSINESS HISTORY
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Chile; developing countries; family business; nineteenth century;
succession
ID CONTINUITY
AB This article analyses the process of succession in three large Chilean family
businesses between c.1860s-1940s, whose combined wealth was 10% of Chilean GDP.
Although there is no general theory of succession planning in family firms, the
most common reasons for why succession fails or succeeds have been identified in
the specialised literature. We have contrasted the evidence we found in our three
case studies against the theories available. The theories underpinning effective
successions are supported by the case studies under analysis: timely selection and
training of a competent successor; a reduced number of heirs; strategically
arranged marriages; and family harmony. Some of the theories behind succession
failure are also borne out by the existing evidence: family rivalries; adverse
external economic shocks; conflicts between the family and the government; lack of
commitment on the part of the heirs to the continuity of the business; unskilled
successors taking over; early deaths from illness. Two further underlying elements
can be identified from the Chilean case studies: fragmentation of the capital of
the group; and the fashion for family members to spend time in Europe as rentiers.
C1 [Nazer, Juan Ricardo] Univ Santiago Chile, CIHEAP FAE, Santiago, Chile.
[Llorca-Jana, Manuel] Univ Santiago Chile, Dept Econ, Santiago, Chile.
RP Llorca-Jana, M (corresponding author), Univ Santiago Chile, Dept Econ, Santiago,
Chile.
EM manuel.llorca@usach.cl
FU Proyecto 031962LLJ_POSTDOC of Universidad de Santiago de Chile
FX This paper received funding from Proyecto 031962LLJ_POSTDOC of
Universidad de Santiago de Chile.
CR Alcorn P.B., 1982, SUCCESS SURVIVAL FAM
Almaraz A., 2018, FAMILIAS EMPRESARIAL
Araya R., 2018, REV HIST INDUST, V74, P43, DOI [10.1344/rhi.v27i74.20260, DOI
10.1344/RHI.V27I74.20260]
ASTORQUIZA O., 1952, CIEN ANOS CARBON LOT
 ASTRACHAN J.H., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REVI, V15, P45, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00045.X
Barach J.A., 1995, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V8, P131, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1995.00131.X
BARNES LB, 1994, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V7, P377, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1994.00377.x
BECKHARD R, 1983, ORGAN DYN, V12, P5, DOI 10.1016/0090-2616(83)90022-0
Bird B., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P337, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00337.X
Birley S, 1986, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V24, P36
Bjuggren P., 2001, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V14, P11, DOI [DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2001.00011.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00011.X]
Cadieux L., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P17, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00017.X
Canseco-Jerez A., 2000, MECENAT EUGENIA HUIC
Christensen CR, 1953, MANAGEMENT SUCCESSIO
Cole Patricia M., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P353, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1997.00353.X
Colli A., 2002, BUSINESS HIST WORLD
COLLI A., 2003, HIST FAMILY BUSINESS
Colli A., 2003, ENTERP SOC, V4, P28, DOI DOI 10.1093/es/4.1.28
Colli A, 2013, SOCIO-ECON REV, V11, P577, DOI 10.1093/ser/mwt010
Compania Explotadora de Lota y Coronel, 1870, JUNT GEN ACC COMP EX
CURTIS W.E., 1888, CAPITALS SPANISH AM
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
Davis P. S., 1998, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V22, P31, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879802200302
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
De Massis A, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P278, DOI 10.1177/0894486516656276
Diaz J., 2016, REPUBLICA CIFRAS HIS
Dunn B., 1995, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V8, P267, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1995.00267.x
Fernandez Marcos, 2010, BEBIDAS ALCOHOLICAS
Fernandez P., 2015, FAMILIAS EMPRESARIAS
Fernandez P., 2012, ULTIMA GLOBALIZACION
FERNANDEZ Paloma y, 2007, REV HIST EC, P459, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0212610900000203
Friedman S. D., 1991, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V4, P3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1991.00003.X
FRIEDMAN SD, 1986, HUM RESOURCE MANAGE, V25, P191, DOI 10.1002/hrm.3930250204
Gaete A., 2003, SORPRENDENTE HIST FA
Gallardo P., 2004, THESIS
Garcia-Alvarez E., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P189, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00189.X
Gersick K. E., 1997, GENERATION GENERATIO
Grote J., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P113, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00113.X
HANDLER W. C., 1994, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V7, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00133.X
Handler W.C., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P361, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1988.00361.X
Handler W. C., 1992, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V5, P283, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1992.00283.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1992.00283.X]
HANDLER W.C., 1990, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V15, P37, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879001500105
Handler W. C., 1991, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V29, P21
Hubler T., 1999, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V12, P117, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1999.00117.x
Ibrahim A.B., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, VXIV, P245, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2001.00245.X
 Illanes M. A., 1992, DOMINACION SILENCIOS
Ip B, 2006, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V13, P326, DOI 10.1108/14626000610680235
Lambrecht J, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00131.x
Lansberg I., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P119, DOI [10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00011-9, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x]
Lansberg I., 1999, SUCCEEDING GENERATIO
Lansberg I. E. P., 1991, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V4, P127
Lee KS, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P657
Lefort F., 2010, OXFORD HDB BUSINESS
Longenecker J. G., 1978, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V16, P1, DOI
10.4135/9781446247556.n13
MALONE SC, 1989, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V2, P341, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1989.tb00003.x
Martinez J., 2015, FAMILIAS EMPRESARIAS
Martinez JI, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P83, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00087.x
MEDINA C., 2007, L COUSINO
Meier O, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P256, DOI 10.1177/0894486516646260
Miller D, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P513, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
Miller RM, 2017, ROUTL COMPANION BUS, P187
Morris M., 1996, INT J ENTREPRENEURIA, V2, P68, DOI DOI
10.1108/13552559610153261
Morris MH, 1997, J BUS VENTURING, V12, P385, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00010-4
Murray B., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P17, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00017.X
Nazer R., 2017, EMPRESAS EMPRESARIOS
Nazer R., 2017, CONTRIBUCIONES CIENT, V42, P63
Nazer R., 1996, HIST COMPANIA CONSUM
NAZER R, 2000, HISTORIA, V33, P369
Nazer R., 2002, MINORANZE CULTURE IM, P39
Nazer R., 2002, B ACAD CHILENA HIST, V111, P337
Nazer R., 1993, JT URMENETA EMPRESAR
Nelson T, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1177/0894486517715390
Oficina Central de Estadistica, 1921, AN EST REP CHIL MIN
Osborne R. L., 1991, MANAGE DECIS, V29, P42
Pizarro A., 1991, LEBU LEUFUMAPU CENTE
POZA E, 1995, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V8, P301, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1995.00301.X
PRZEWORSKI JF, 1980, DECLINE COPPER IND C
Ramon A., 1999, BIOGRAFIAS CHILENOS
Nazer JR, 2017, ATENEA-CONCEPC, P49
RIVERA G., 1900, ANTECEDENTES DOCUMEN
Rodriguez H., 1988, B ACAD CHILENA HIST, V99, P257
Ross A., 1926, REMINISCENCIAS HIST
Schneider BR, 2009, J LAT AM STUD, V41, P553, DOI 10.1017/S0022216X09990186
Seymour K. C., 1993, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V6, P263
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00001.X
Sharma P., 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V25, P17, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870102500302
Sharma P., 2004, FAM BUS REV, V17, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2004.00001.X
SOCIEDAD AGRICOLA DEL MAIPO, 1940, EST SOC AN FUND 10 A
Sociedad de Renta Matias Cousino, 1935, EST
Stavrou E. P., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V11, P135, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1998.00135.x
Subercaseaux B., 1954, DON MAXIMIANO
UNDURRAGA J., 1923, RIQUEZA MOBILIARIA C
Venter E, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P283, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00049.x
 VIAL Gonzalo, 2009, AEM CLURE PERIODISTA
Videla T., 1887, B SOC NACL AGR, V22, P686
Ward J, 1987, KEEPING FAMILY BUSIN, DOI DOI 10.1093/SW/22.3.241
Wortman M. S., 1994, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V7, P3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00003.X
NR 98
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 10
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0007-6791
EI 1743-7938
J9 BUS HIST
JI Bus. Hist.
DI 10.1080/00076791.2020.1717471
EA JAN 2020
PG 26
WC Business; History Of Social Sciences
SC Business & Economics; Social Sciences - Other Topics
GA KF7QA
UT WOS:000509432500001
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Anggadwita, G
Profityo, WB
Alamanda, DT
Permatasari, A
AF Anggadwita, Grisna
Profityo, Werda Bagus
Alamanda, Dini Turipanam
Permatasari, Anggraeni
TI Cultural values and their implications to family business succession: A
case study of small Chinese-owned family businesses in Bandung,
Indonesia
SO JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Cultural values; Succession planning; Small family business; Chinese
family business; Unique characteristics
AB Purpose The family business is one of the business entities that contribute to
the economy of a country. Succession in the family business occupies a strategic
position, especially in maintaining the company's sustainability. The Chinese
family business has unique characteristics in maintaining and growing its business
with the cultural values that underlie how their business. The purpose of this
paper is to discuss the cultural values of Chinese ethnic and their implications in
the succession process in small family businesses in Bandung, Indonesia.
Design/methodology/approach This research uses a qualitative method with the in-
depth interview method as a data collection technique. The sampling technique uses
purposive sampling, while to test the validity of research data using a
triangulation technique. A total of four small Chinese-owned family businesses
participated as informants in this study. The study will identify the stage of
succession process in the Chinese family business.
Findings There are several stages identified in the succession planning of small
Chinese-owned family business in Bandung which include succession antecedents,
succession activities and desired outcomes. The results showed that small Chinese-
owned family business in Bandung has not applied the rules and procedures in the
succession process. Most of the Chinese family business in this research still
holds Confucianism culture; they prioritize boys as business successors, who have a
greater responsibility rather than successor with other gender.
Practical implications Several implications are discussed. One of them is the
Chinese family business holding cultural values in the process of family business
succession.
Originality/value This research is expected to provide theoretical and practical
implications for academics and family companies with similar cases.
C1 [Anggadwita, Grisna] Telkom Univ, Sch Econ & Business, Bandung, Indonesia.
[Profityo, Werda Bagus] Bandung Inst Technol, Bandung, Indonesia.
[Alamanda, Dini Turipanam] Garut Univ, Fac Social Sci & Polit Sci, Garut,
Indonesia.
[Permatasari, Anggraeni] President Univ, Cikarang Baru, Indonesia.
RP Anggadwita, G (corresponding author), Telkom Univ, Sch Econ & Business, Bandung,
Indonesia.
EM grisnamailbox@yahoo.co.id
RI Anggadwita, Grisna/O-3492-2019
OI Anggadwita, Grisna/0000-0003-1503-9146
CR Ambrogio S, 2017, ASIAN STUD-AZIJSKE S, V5, P113, DOI 10.4312/as.2017.5.2.113-
135
Aronoff C.E., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS SUCC
Bernard C., 2013, AM FAMILY SMALL BUSI
Brockhaus R.H., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P165, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2004.00011.X
CEO Stars, 2016, 95 PERSEN PERUSAHAAN
Chen HL, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P347, DOI 10.1177/0894486509341062
Chen M.J., 2001, INSIDE CHINESE BUSIN
Coppel C.A., 2008, ETHNIC CHINESE CONT, P117
Dana L. P., 2005, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business,
V2, P79, DOI 10.1504/IJESB.2005.006071
Dana L.P., 2015, INT J ENTREP SMALL B, V26, P154
Dana L.-P., 2014, ASIAN MODELS ENTREPR
Dana LP, 1999, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V37, P76
DEVRIES MFRK, 1993, ORGAN DYN, V21, P59
Donnelley R.G., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS SOUR
Duh M., 2015, INT J BUSINESS MANAG, V10, P45
Dyck B, 2002, J BUS VENTURING, V17, P143, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00056-2
Eppink A., 2011, EPPINK MODEL PSYCHOL
Gashi G., 2013, ENTREPRENEURSHIP BAL, P91
Gatfield T., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P153
Handler W.C., 1994, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V7, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00133.X
Higginson N., 2010, J MANAGEMENT MARKETI, V4, P1
Hubberman A.M., 1994, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA
Jakarta Consulting Group, 2014, SUKSESI DALAM PERUSA
Kaiser K, 2009, QUAL HEALTH RES, V19, P1632, DOI 10.1177/1049732309350879
Kamei Katsuyuki, 2012, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small
Business, V16, P60, DOI 10.1504/IJESB.2012.046917
Kaneff M., 2011, TAKING OVER INSIDER
Karam P.B.S., 2017, THESIS U DE SAO PAUL
Longenecker J., 2003, SMALL BUSINESS MANAG
Man Thomas Wing Yan, 2016, International Journal of Management Practice, V9,
P412
McCollom M.E., 1988, FAM BUS REV, V1, P399
McNamara K., 2009, J AM ACAD BUSINESS V, V15, P31
Moleong L.J., 2011, METODOLOGI PENELITIA
Morris MH, 1997, J BUS VENTURING, V12, P385, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00010-4
 Peake W, 2017, J FAM BUS MANAG, V7, P134, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-06-2016-0012
Polkinghorne DE, 2005, J COUNS PSYCHOL, V52, P137, DOI 10.1037/0022-
0167.52.2.137
PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2018, PWC CHINA FAMILY BUS
Qin Z., 2012, BUSINESS REV CAMBRID, V20, P68
Ramadani Veland, 2015, World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and
Sustainable Development, V11, P391
Ramadani V., 2015, FAMILY BUSINESSES TR, P9
Ramadani V, 2017, INT J GEND ENTREP, V9, P229, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-02-2017-0012
Remiswal S.M., 2013, MENGGUGAH PARTISIPAS
Robbins S.P., 2003, ESSENTIALS ORG BEHAV, V7
Felix EGS, 2019, J FAM BUS MANAG, V9, P228, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-10-2018-0051
Sorenson RL, 2013, J MANAG SPIRITUAL RE, V10, P117, DOI
10.1080/14766086.2012.758050
Sugiyono M.P.K., 2014, KUALITATIF DAN KOMBI
Tsai YF, 2011, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V11, DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-98
Wah S.S., 2001, SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT, V23, P75
Wang W., 2008, THESIS U NOTTINGHAM
Weidenbaum M, 1996, CALIF MANAGE REV, V38, P141, DOI 10.2307/41165857
Wong S.L., 1993, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V6, P327
Yan J, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P235, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00072.x
Yeung IYM, 1996, ORGAN DYN, V25, P54, DOI 10.1016/S0090-2616(96)90025-X
Yin RK, 2013, EVALUATION-US, V19, P321, DOI 10.1177/1356389013497081
Zhu Y., 2004, IND RELATIONS J VOL, V35, P311
Zubir N., 2008, FAMILLIONAIRE BUILDI
NR 55
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 0
PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BINGLEY
PA HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
SN 2043-6238
EI 2043-6246
J9 J FAM BUS MANAG
JI J. Fam. Bus. Manag.
PY 2020
VL 10
IS 4
SI SI
BP 281
EP 292
DI 10.1108/JFBM-03-2019-0017
PG 12
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA QE0LX
UT WOS:000615900300002
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Grangaud, I
AF Grangaud, Isabelle
TI Where does the Family End ? Successions Membership Rights and Bayt
al-mal in Algiers during the Ottoman Era
SO ATELIER DU CENTRE DE RECHERCHES HISTORIQUES
LA French
DT Article
DE Ritual Heir (asib); Burial Ritual; Responsibility; Property in
Disinheritance; Family; Village Community; Tribe; Algiers; Ottoman
Period
AB This article analyses the procedures of an Algerian Ottoman authority, the Bayt
al-mal, to support the defense claims of property in disinheritance. It considers
some of the situations that show the reasons for it. In a first part the analysis
focuses on the conditions of a transaction at the end of which Bayt al-mal obtained
the means to exercise these prerogatives. A second part analyses the intersecting
logics of competing claims on properties without owner, showing that the authority
of Bayt al-mal as well as families and village or tribal communities confronted
each other on this same ground in similar terms.
C1 [Grangaud, Isabelle] Ctr Natl Rech Sci, Paris, France.
[Grangaud, Isabelle] Ctr Norbert Elias Marseille, Marseille, France.
RP Grangaud, I (corresponding author), Ctr Natl Rech Sci, Paris, France.; Grangaud,
I (corresponding author), Ctr Norbert Elias Marseille, Marseille, France.
EM IsabelleGrangaud@gmail.com
CR AL-MABSUT Faruq, 2003, THESIS, P91
AL-MABSUT Faruq, 2003, THESIS, P96
[Anonymous], 2018, EMP PRES BAYT MAL TR
CHAUMONT Eric, 1998, TRAVAUX MEMOIRES CTR, P35
DEVOULX Albert, 1870, EDIFICES RELIG ANCIE, P255
Doumani B., 2017, FAMILY LIFE OTTOMAN
DULOUT Fernand, 1947, TRAITE DROIT MUSULMA
DULOUT Fernand, 1947, TRAITE DROIT MUSULMA
HENIA Abdelhamid, 2015, FRERE SUJET CITOYEN
Khoury Dina Rizk, 1997, STATE PROVINCIAL SOC
LEWIS Bernard, 1954, ENCY ISLAM
LEWIS Bernard, 1954, ENCY ISLAM, P1181
LOUALICH Fatiha, 2016, FAMILLE ALGER 17 18
MAHE Alain, 2001, HIST GRANDE KABYLIE
na CERUTTI Simo-, 2012, ETRANGERS ETUDE COND
PHARO Patrick, 2002, CAH INT SOCIOL, V113, P308
POWERS David S., 1986, STUDIES QURAN HADITH
SALZMANN Ariel, 2003, TOCQUEVILLE OTTOMAN
Scheele J, 2010, ISLAM LAW SOC, V17, P350, DOI 10.1163/156851910X493170
Vatin Nicolas, 2013, DICT EMPIRE OTTOMAN
WARSCHEID Ismail, 2017, DROIT MUSULMAN SOC S
NR 21
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU CENTRE NATL RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE, CENTRE RECHERCHES HISTORIQUES
PI PARIS
PA 54 BD RASPAIL, PARIS, 75006, FRANCE
SN 1760-7914
J9 ATELIER CENT RECH HI
JI Atelier Cent. Rech. Historiques
PY 2020
IS 22
DI 10.4000/acrh.11287
PG 14
WC History
SC History
GA PC1KW
UT WOS:000596768800008
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Barr, AR
AF Barr, Alan R.
TI Death the Leveller - Happy and Unhappy Family Succession
SO EDINBURGH LAW REVIEW
LA English
DT Editorial Material
C1 [Barr, Alan R.] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Law, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland.
[Barr, Alan R.] Brodies LLP, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland.
RP Barr, AR (corresponding author), Univ Edinburgh, Sch Law, Edinburgh, Midlothian,
Scotland.; Barr, AR (corresponding author), Brodies LLP, Edinburgh, Midlothian,
Scotland.
CR Christandl G, 2020, EDINB LAW REV, V24, P138, DOI 10.3366/elr.2020.0611
Gretton GL, 2020, EDINB LAW REV, V24, P132, DOI 10.3366/elr.2020.0610
Reid D, 2008, EDINB LAW REV, V12, P391, DOI 10.3366/E1364980908000632
Reid KGC, 2020, EDINB LAW REV, V24, P118, DOI 10.3366/elr.2020.0608
Schmidt JP, 2020, EDINB LAW REV, V24, P123, DOI 10.3366/elr.2020.0609
Scottish Government, 2019, CONS LAW SUCC
NR 6
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 0
PU EDINBURGH UNIV PRESS
PI EDINBURGH
PA THE TUN-HOLYROOD RD, 12 2F JACKSONS ENTRY, EDINBURGH EH8 8PJ, SCOTLAND
SN 1364-9809
EI 1755-1692
J9 EDINB LAW REV
JI Edinb. Law Rev.
PD JAN
PY 2020
VL 24
IS 1
BP 143
EP 147
DI 10.3366/elr.2020.0612
PG 6
WC Law
SC Government & Law
GA KC7DS
UT WOS:000507334500015
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT B
AU Folvarcna, A
Fialova, V
Kolkova, A
AF Folvarcna, Andrea
Fialova, Vendula
Kolkova, Andrea
BE Dvoulety, O
Lukes, M
Misar, J
TI INNOVATIONS IN FAMILY BUSINESS: SUCCESSION AND ITS INFLUENCE ON SOURCES
OF INVESTMENT
SO PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT,
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY (IMES 2020)
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 8th International Conference on Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship
and Sustainability (IMES)
CY MAY 28-29, 2020
CL Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC
SP Univ Econ, Fac Business Adm, Dept Entrepreneurship, Comenius Univ, Fac
Management, Linnaeus Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Corvinus Univ Budapest, European
Council Small Business & Entrepreneurship, JEMI, CESKA Sporitelna
DE family business; succession; innovation
ID FIRMS; CZECH
AB Purpose: This research paper is dedicated to innovation in family businesses.
The aim is to determine whether the degree of innovation in family businesses is
related to the advent of successor generation, what kind of approach to innovation
the successor generation has and what level of innovation in family businesses
depends on other selected factors.
Design/methodology/approach: The methodology is based on the study of foreign
and domestic sources and subsequent empirical research. The interviewing process
took place between December 2018 and October 2019; research was built on 151
respondents of family businesses in the Czech Republic A graphical representation
was used to evaluate the questionnaire followed by quantification of the
association rates. The results were then tested using Pearson's test.
Findings: There is a relationship between succession in family businesses and
the choice of different sources of invention and finance for innovation activities.
And the greatest effects in implementing innovation are achieved by generations
working together.
Research/practical implications: The conclusions can be used to plan succession
and a takeover in a family business. Research shows that family businesses are
likely to generate disagreement among its members, hence it would be useful to
continue further research on other aspects of succession, such as the age of active
family members (founders and successors), the goals of innovative activities or
reasons for using different sources of financing.
Originality/value: The research addresses not only innovation and innovativeness
in family businesses but also examines how the successor generation has an impact
on the frequency and degree of innovation in family businesses. The main benefit of
this research is that it brings significant insights into the approach and
influence of the successor generation on the innovation of Czech family businesses.
C1 [Folvarcna, Andrea; Fialova, Vendula] Coll Entrepreneurship & Law, Dept Business
& Management, Vltayska 585-14, Prague 15000 5, Czech Republic.
[Kolkova, Andrea] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Dept Business Adm, Fac Econ, Sokolska
Trida 2416-33, Ostrava 70200, Czech Republic.
RP Folvarcna, A (corresponding author), Coll Entrepreneurship & Law, Dept Business
& Management, Vltayska 585-14, Prague 15000 5, Czech Republic.
EM andrea.folvarcna@vspp.cz; vendula.fialova@vspp.cz; andrea.kolkova@vsb.cz
CR European Family Businesses, 2014, FAM BUS LONG TERM
Family Firm Institute, 2016, DEF FAMILY ENT
Filser M, 2018, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V35, P609, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12433
Gjergji R, 2019, MANAG RES, V17, P304, DOI 10.1108/MRJIAM-03-2019-0913
Hauck J, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.11.002
Hebak P., 2015, STAT MYSLENI NASTROJ
Hillebrand S, 2020, BRIT J MANAGE, V31, P792, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.12375
Jurik NC, 2019, INT SMALL BUS J, V37, P317, DOI 10.1177/0266242618825260
Lazzarotti V, 2015, EUR J INT MANAG, V9, P179, DOI 10.1504/EJIM.2015.067854
Machek O., 2019, J E EUR MANAG STUD, V24, pxx
Machek O, 2017, J E EUR MANAG STUD, V22, P362, DOI 10.5771/0949-6181-2017-3-362
Miller D, 2007, J CORP FINANC, V13, P829, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004
OECD & Eurostat, 2018, OSL MAN 2018 GUID CO, DOI [10.1787/9789264304604-en, DOI
10.1787/9789264304604-EN]
Sciascia S, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P331, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00133.x
Servus S., 2018, AKTUALNI OTAZKY NAST
NR 15
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU OECONOMICA PUBLISHING HOUSE
PI PRAGUE 3
PA UNIV ECONOMICS, PRAGUE, W CHURCHILL SQ 4, PRAGUE 3, 130 67, CZECH
REPUBLIC
BN 978-80-245-2378-1
PY 2020
BP 153
EP 166
PG 14
WC Business; Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Management
SC Business & Economics; Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA BQ4HI
UT WOS:000589725700013
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Kilic, A
Filizoz, B
AF Kilic, A.
Filizoz, B.
TI QUANTIFYING FAMILY BUSINESS OWNERS' ATTITUDES TOWARDS SUCCESSION:
DELVING DEEPER BY RANDOM FORESTS
SO CENTRAL EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE machine learning; small-sized enterprises; family business
AB Family businesses are the lifeblood of the economic growth of the nations.
However, a large gap exists about the application of machine-learning algorithms
such as Random Forests (RF) to the quantification of patterns, drivers, and
interactions in the succession process of family businesses. The primary aim and
novelty of this study lie in the quantification of variable importance based on
machine-learning algorithms, and the differences among the characteristics of
family businesses, family employees, and family business owners (FBOs) for
multivariate responses. For this reason, a field study was carried out in family
businesses in Sivas and Ardahan provinces. The questionnaire form created by the
researchers was used in this study. In this research, RF classification model was
applied. RF classification models of 17 response variables were constructed as a
function of 32 predictors.
Implications for Central European audience: Impacts of characteristics of FBOs,
family businesses, and family employees on FBOs' willingness to transfer to
successors and preferences about the successor's qualities were modelled. High-
dimensional data were collected from 53 family business owners (FBOs) in two cities
for a total of 49 variables. As a result, the domain of the FBOs' characteristics
was found to have a more profound impact on both FBO's willingness to transfer to a
successor and what successor's qualities were most valued than did the domains of
the family business and employee characteristics.
C1 [Kilic, A.] Ardahan Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, Ardahan,
Turkey.
[Filizoz, B.] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, Sivas,
Turkey.
RP Kilic, A (corresponding author), Ardahan Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business
Adm, Ardahan, Turkey.
EM arzukilic@ardahan.edu.tr; berrinfilizoz@gmail.com
CR Allio M., 2004, STRATEGY LEADERSHIP, V32, P24, DOI DOI 10.1108/10878570410576704
ASSBA, 2016, KEY SUST SUCC FAM BU
Bau M, 2013, LANDSCAPE OF FAMILY BUSINESS, P167
Bhattacharyya S, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V50, P602, DOI
10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.008
Blodgett MS, 2011, J BUS ETHICS, V99, P29, DOI DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-1164-7
Breiman L, 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
Cesaroni FM, 2017, SMALL ENTERP RES, V24, P167, DOI
10.1080/13215906.2017.1338193
Chrisman J. J., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V11, P19, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1998.00019.X]
Chua J.H., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P89, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00089.X
Chua J. H. J. J., 1999, ENTREPRENEURSHIP THE, V23, P19, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879902300402
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
Devany C., 2006, J PROPERTY MANAGEMEN, V71, P14
Elith J, 2008, J ANIM ECOL, V77, P802, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x
Gomba M, 2016, INT J BUSINESS ADM, V7, P9
Grimmer J, 2015, PS-POLIT SCI POLIT, V48, P80, DOI 10.1017/S1049096514001784
Guller S, 2010, THESIS
Hacibayramoglu M. G, 2014, THESIS
Hothorn T, 2006, J COMPUT GRAPH STAT, V15, P651, DOI 10.1198/106186006X133933
Jordan MI, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P255, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa8415
Laakkonen A, 2011, MANAG RES REV, V34, P980, DOI 10.1108/01409171111158956
Lazer D, 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P721, DOI 10.1126/science.1167742
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Luo T, 2004, IEEE T SYST MAN CY B, V34, P1753, DOI 10.1109/TSMCB.2004.830340
Muller D, 2016, ANN M 7 INT C COMP S, P1
Nordqvist M, 2010, ENTREP REGION DEV, V22, P211, DOI 10.1080/08985621003726119
Peltonen J, 2018, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, DOI [10.5465/AMBPP.2018.154, DOI
10.5465/AMBPP.2018.154]
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P., 2000, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V13, P313, DOI [10.1111/j.1741, DOI
10.1111/J.1741]
Sharma P., 2004, FAM BUS REV, V17, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2004.00001.X
Strobl C, 2007, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V8, DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-8-25
Tucker J, 2011, J FAM BUS MANAG, V1, P65, DOI 10.1108/20436231111122290
Tuncel H.T, 2011, NOT I FAMILY BUSINES
van Praag CM, 2007, SMALL BUS ECON, V29, P351, DOI 10.1007/s11187-007-9074-x
Venter E, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P283, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00049.x
Verikas A, 2011, PATTERN RECOGN, V44, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.08.011
Yu A, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P33, DOI 10.1177/0894486511430329
Zehe A. K, 2016, THESIS, P1
NR 37
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU UNIV ECONOMICS-PRAGUE
PI PRAGUE 3
PA OECONOMICA PUBL, NAM W CHIRCHILLA 4, PRAGUE 3, CZ-130 67, CZECH REPUBLIC
EI 1805-4862
J9 CENT EUR BUS REV
JI Cent. Eur. Bus. Rev.
PY 2020
VL 9
IS 3
BP 1
EP 23
DI 10.18267/j.cebr.235
PG 23
WC Business
SC Business & Economics
GA MM2XC
UT WOS:000550018700001
OA Other Gold
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Poschl, A
Freiling, J
AF Poeschl, Alexander
Freiling, Joerg
TI The impact of family-external business succession on digitalization:
exploring management buy-ins
SO IJISPM-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE family business succession; digitalization; digital transformation;
entrepreneurship theory; management buy-in
ID INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; CHALLENGE; ADOPTION
AB Digitalization in small- and medium-sized (SME) family firms and processes of
family-external business succession within these firms are under-researched areas.
As SME and their future viability are important for many economies around the
world, we aim to study the effects of succession processes on those companies'
digitalization activities. Utilizing a unique data set comprising of around 340
pages of transcribed interviews within a multiple case study involving four family
firms in the DACH region of Europe, we perform exploratory research of this matter.
Our findings indicate that incumbent and new owner-managers focus on efficiency-
related digitalization activities during succession processes. More long-term
issues such as changes to business models or the exploitation of external
opportunities through digitalization are underrated and postponed. Our findings
contribute to both digitalization and family firm literature and we provide
suggestions for future research in this regard.
C1 [Poeschl, Alexander] Int Univ Appl Sci Bad Honnef, Bonn, Germany.
[Freiling, Joerg] Univ Bremen, Fac Business Studies & Econ, Bremen, Germany.
RP Poschl, A (corresponding author), Int Univ Appl Sci Bad Honnef, Bonn, Germany.
EM a.poeschl@iubh-dualesstudium.de; freiling@uni-bremen.de
OI Poeschl, Alexander/0000-0001-6657-8807
CR Ali RHRM, 2018, IJISPM-INT J INF SYS, V6, P61, DOI 10.12821/ijispm060404
Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy Family and Youth, 2011, ERF OST FAM
Bavarian State Ministry of Economic Affairs Energy and Technology, 2018, ERH AN
UNT BAYERN
Berman Saul J., 2012, Strategy & Leadership, V40, P16, DOI
10.1108/10878571211209314
Bley K., 2016, 22 AM C INF SYST AMC
Bogner E, 2016, PROC CIRP, V57, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.004
Bollweg L., 2016, PAC AS C INF SYST PA
Bouwman H, 2018, DIGIT POLICY REGUL G, V20, P105, DOI 10.1108/DPRG-07-2017-0039
Bruce D, 2006, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V44, P306, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2006.00171.x
Bruining H, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V40, P591, DOI 10.1007/s11187-011-9386-8
Buhl H. U., 2008, Z BANKRECHT BANKWIRT, V20, P43
Chiang H., 2018, INVESTMENT MANAGEMEN, V15, P58
Chrisman JJ, 2012, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V3, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.10.003
Collin J., 2015, IT LEADERSHIP TRANSI
Cravotta S., 2019, J EVOLUTIONARY STUDI, V4, P1
Curran J., 2001, RES SMALL ENTERPRISE
Daily C. M., 1993, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V31, P79
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
De Vaus D., 2001, RES DESIGN SOCIAL RE
Deutsche Bank Research, 2010, GROSST FAM DEUTSCHL
DiCicco-Bloom B, 2006, MED EDUC, V40, P314, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
Durst S., 2017, INT J MANAGEMENT CAS, V19, P201
DYER W.G., 1994, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V19, P71, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879401900105
Dyer WG, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P253, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00074.x
Eisenhardt KM, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P25, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
Elbeltagi I, 2013, J GLOB INF MANAG, V21, P23, DOI 10.4018/jgim.2013040102
Epstein M. J., 2005, BUS HORIZONS, V48, P37, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.BUSH0R.2004.10.001
European Central Bank, 2011, SURV ACC FIN SMES EU
European Commission, 2006, MARK BUS TRANSF FOST
European Commission, 2005, NEW SME DEF US GUID
Feltham TS, 2005, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V43, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2004.00122.x
Foroudi P, 2017, QUAL MARK RES, V20, P230, DOI 10.1108/QMR-01-2017-0014
FOX M, 1996, INT SMALL BUS J, V15, P15, DOI DOI 10.1177/0266242696151001
Freiling J., 2011, 56 ANN ICSB WORLD C
Fueglistaller U., 2012, ENTREPRENEURSHIP MOD
Geider F. J., 1995, METHODENATLAS SOZIAL
Goffee R., 2014, REAL WORLD SMALL BUS
Golden BR, 1997, ACAD MANAGE J, V40, P1243, DOI 10.2307/256935
Gorres A., 2005, VENTURE CAPITAL MAGA, V10, P48
Grethe C., 2010, RESTRUKTURIERUNG KRI
Grottke M., 2018, NACHSCHR TAG FAM EQU, V22/2018
Habbershon T.G., 1999, FAM BUS REV, V12, P1, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1999.00001.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1999.00001.X]
Halter F., 2009, PERSPEKTIVE MEDIATIO, V4, P178
Halter F., 2013, Z KMU ENTREPRENEURSH, V61, P35
Hatak I., 2016, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V28, P10
Haunschild L., 2007, IFM MAT, V172
Haunschild L., 2010, IFM MAT, V199
Hauser H.-E., 2010, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG, V198
Helin J, 2016, INT SMALL BUS J, V34, P487, DOI 10.1177/0266242614567482
Henfridsson O, 2014, J INF TECHNOL, V29, P27, DOI 10.1057/jit.2013.30
Henriette E, 2015, 9 MED C INF SYST MCI
Hopkins J., J FINANCIAL PLANNING, V27, P54
Howorth C, 2004, J BUS VENTURING, V19, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.002
HOWORTH C, 2007, FRONTIERS ENTREPRENE, V27
Kayser G., 2006, PRAXISHANDBUCH MITTE, P33
Kollmann T., 2016, E BUSINESS
Kumar N, 2009, HARVARD BUS REV, V87, P115
Kvale S., 2007, DOING INTERVIEWS
Laub J., 1995, MANAGEMENT BUY OUTS
Legner C, 2017, BUS INFORM SYST ENG+, V59, P301, DOI 10.1007/s12599-017-0484-2
Lindsey K., 2018, GLOBAL FINANCE J, DOI [10.1016/j.gfj. 2018.11.003, DOI
10.1016/J.GFJ.2018.11.003]
Luippold T. L., 1991, MANAGEMENT BUY OUTS
 Mandl I., 2008, UNTERNEHMENSUBERGABE
March JG, 1991, ORGAN SCI, V2, P71, DOI 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Maxwell JosephA., 2005, QUALITATIVE RES DESI
Meijaard J., 2005, N200505 SCALES
Meinefeld W., 2012, QUALITATIVE FORSCHUN, P265
Miles M. B., 1994, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA
Mitchell JR, 2009, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V33, P1201, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2009.00341.x
Nelson R., 1994, J EVOLUTIONARY EC, V4, P153, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01236366
Neubauer F., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS ITS
Neumeier A., 2017, P 13 INT C WIRTSCH W, P484
Nguyen TH, 2015, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V53, P207, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12058
Ollo-Lopez A, 2012, TELEMAT INFORM, V29, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2011.08.002
Pack H., 2002, HDB INT MERGERS ACQU, P153
Parviainen P, 2017, IJISPM-INT J INF SYS, V5, P63, DOI 10.12821/ijispm050104
Pinkwart A., 2005, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG, P3
Posch A., 2012, Z BETRIEBSWIRT, P5
Poschl A., 2014, THESIS
Quinton S, 2018, J STRATEG MARK, V26, P427, DOI 10.1080/0965254X.2016.1258004
Randolph RV, 2017, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V55, P530, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12342
Reay T., 2014, SAGE HDB FAMILY BUSI
Reis J., 2018, WORLDCIST 18 2018 AD, V745
Remes J, 2018, INT PRODUCT MONIT, V35, P28
Robbie K., 1996, MANAGEMENT BUY INS E
Rousseau M. B., 2018, FAMILY BUSINESS REV
Russ W., 2005, PRAXISHANDBUCH INVES, P253
Schmude J., 2003, GRUNDUNG TECHNOLOGIE, P177
Schwartz M., 2018, KFW RES
Selander L, 2013, J INF TECHNOL-UK, V28, P183, DOI 10.1057/jit.2013.14
Sharma P., 2002, AC MAN ANN C DENV US
Sherer J. A., 2015, RICHMOND J LAW TECHN, V21, P1
Siggelkow N, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P20, DOI 10.5465/amj.2007.24160882
Sirmon DS, 2003, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V27, P339, DOI DOI 10.1111/1540-8520.T01-
1-00013
Sommer L, 2015, J IND ENG MANAG-JIEM, V8, P1512, DOI 10.3926/jiem.1470
Stolterman E, 2004, INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH: RELEVANT THEORY AND INFORMED
PRACTICE, P687
Taiminen HM, 2015, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V22, P633, DOI 10.1108/JSBED-05-2013-
0073
Wallau F., 2010, VORTRAG ANLASSLICH B
Ward J. L., 1987, KEEPING FAMILY BUSIN
Weber H., 2009, FAMILIENEXTERNE UNTE
Wennberg K., 2010, RATIO WORKING PAPERS, V157
Werner A, 2018, SMALL BUS ECON, V50, P201, DOI 10.1007/s11187-017-9884-4
Westerman G., 2014, LEADING DIGITAL TURN
Williams Susan P., 2014, International Journal of Information Systems and
Project Management, V2, P5, DOI 10.12821/ijispm020401
Wirtz B. W., 2018, ELECT BUSINESS
Wolf T, 2018, INFORM SPEKTRUM, V41, P56, DOI 10.1007/s00287-017-1084-8
Wright M., 1995, J BUSINESS FINANCE A, V22, P461, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-
5957.1995.TB00372.X
Wright M, 2018, ROUTLEDGE COMPANION
Yin R.K, 2013, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
Zellweger T, 2007, SCHWEIZER ARBEITGEBE, V15, P30
NR 110
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU SCIKA
PI CORRELHA
PA SCIKA, CORRELHA, 00000, PORTUGAL
SN 2182-7796
EI 2182-7788
J9 IJISPM-INT J INF SYS
JI IJISPM-Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag.
PY 2020
VL 8
IS 2
BP 24
EP 46
DI 10.12821/ijispm080202
PG 23
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA MH5RJ
UT WOS:000546785800003
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Comelles, CA
AF Argelich Comelles, Cristina
TI Mediation, Succession Disputes and Family Business
SO REVISTA DE MEDIACION
LA Spanish
DT Article
DE civil mediation; succession disputes; family business; corporate
compliance; family protocol
AB The aim of this paper is to analyze the Mediations that originate or is produced
after a succession process, particularly when a family business is involved. In
this regard, different succession instruments will be studied, such as cautela
socini, appointing trustees, mediation dispositions in wills, and will substitutes,
as well as family genome and the role of Notaries in dispute resolution. Lastly,
conflict resolution in family businesses is addressed by dealing with specific
instruments such as Corporate Bylaws, Corporate Compliance and Family Protocol.
C1 [Argelich Comelles, Cristina] Univ Cadiz, Derecho Civil, Cadiz, Spain.
RP Comelles, CA (corresponding author), Univ Cadiz, Derecho Civil, Cadiz, Spain.
EM cristina.argelich@uca.es
RI Comelles, Cristina Argelich/Q-7729-2016
OI Comelles, Cristina Argelich/0000-0001-6530-525X
CR Alonso Dal Monte C., 2012, REV MEDIACION, P34
Barruetabena Zenekorta M., 2015, DIARIO LEY, V8479, P1
Briz M. J., 2017, ANUARIO URUGUAYO CRI, V5, P65
Cobas Cobiella M. E., 2016, REV DERECHO EMPRESA, V8, P68
Marin Hita L. J., 2013, DERECHO NEGOCIOS, V271, P29
Martin Garcia M. L., 2014, ESTUDIOS DERECHO SUC, P791
Martin Najera M. T., 2009, REV MEDIACION, P12
Martinez Moreno A., 2010, MEDIACION FAMILIAR, P387
Ynaraja JLM, 2009, REV MEDIACION, V2, P6
Ministry of Law and Justice Government of India, 2019, CHIN MIN RES 2019, P1
Moreton Sanz M. F., 2010, REV CRITICA DERECHO, V721, P2406
Perez Gimenez M. T., 2010, ACTUALIDAD CIVIL, V9, P997
Reyero Serret S., 2012, REV MEDIACION, P42
Romagosa Danes A., 2016, DIARIO LEY, P1
Torres Ferradas A. M., 2018, CONSTRUCCION PAZ TRA, P414
Tortajada Chardi P., 2018, DIARIO LEY, V9248, P1
 Utrera Gutierrez J. L., 2004, ACTUALIZACION DERECH, P137
NR 17
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU INST MOTIVACIONAL ESTRATEGICO
PI MADRID
PA INST MOTIVACIONAL ESTRATEGICO, MADRID, 00000, SPAIN
SN 1888-6485
EI 2340-9754
J9 REV MEDIACION
JI Rev. Mediac.
PY 2020
VL 13
IS 1
AR e3
PG 8
WC Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
SC Social Sciences - Other Topics
GA MD2CX
UT WOS:000543782300003
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Malik, TH
AF Malik, Tariq H.
TI Contextual Bricolage and the Founder's Apprehension in the
inter-generational Succession of Small Family Businesses
SO MANAGEMENT REVUE
LA English
DT Article
DE Small family business; succession the founder's apprehension;
inter-conceptual bricolage; function-structure salience; actor structure
salience; actor-function salience
ID ATTENTION-BASED VIEW; ENTREPRENEURIAL EXIT; POSITIVE EMOTIONS;
MANAGEMENT; CHOICE; FIRMS; TIME; SELF; CONSTITUTES; RESOURCES
AB Small family businesses (SFBs) encounter disruption during the inter-
generational succession that has drawn attention to the founder's apprehension but
has overlooked the contextual attention in intensity and inter-contextual
interaction. Inter-contextual interaction refers to the combination of two contexts
such as actors and place or timing and structure. This article addresses this
question to explore the salience of contextual intensity and bricolage between two
contexts (e.g. actors and place) through a two-stage method. First, we used
qualitative data and codified it, using content analysis. Second, we used
quantified content analysis for the intensity and bricolage within and between
contextual attention of the founder. We applied the contextual bricolage framework
based on five rhetorical contexts as variables. Based on 200 questions used in the
18 in-depth interviews with founders engaged in the process of inter-generation
succession, we coded the data along with the interview questions as observations
and the contextual elements as the variable, for a descriptive analysis of the
themes and inter-contextual bricolage of correlations. The findings of basic
statistical analysis for the exploratory purpose show the result in two stages:
inter-contextual bricolage of five rhetorical contexts and inter-actor intensity
against functions and structures. In the inter-contextual bricolage, function-
structure (r = 83 %), actor-structure (r = 81 %), and function-actor (r = 79 %)
take the top position in the bricolage. In the inter-actor bricolage vis-a-vis
functions and structures, the collective (we), children (they), and the self (I),
and the parent (family) show high inter-correlations with functions and structures.
Our analysis of this study supports bricolage, identifies inter-contextual
bricolage, and highlights the salience of function and structures with actors
within and between rhetorical references. Spatial and temporal concerns appear
weaker in the SFB succession in Thailand.
C1 [Malik, Tariq H.] Liaoning Univ, Int Ctr Org & Innovat Studies, Shenyang,
Peoples R China.
RP Malik, TH (corresponding author), Liaoning Univ, Int Ctr Org & Innovat Studies,
Shenyang, Peoples R China.
EM t.h.malik@lnu.edu.cn
OI Malik, Tariq/0000-0001-6906-3622
CR Abramson M., 1983, SOCIAL RES METHODS
Annesley TM, 2010, CLIN CHEM, V56, P897, DOI 10.1373/clinchem.2010.146589
Baker T., 2005, ADM SCI Q, V50
Baker T, 2007, J BUS VENTURING, V22, P694, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.10.008
Baron RA, 2008, ACAD MANAGE REV, V33, P328
Bateson G., 1972, STEPS ECOLOGY MIND
Berg BruceL., 2006, QUALITATIVE RES METH, V6th
Bertrand M, 2008, J FINANC ECON, V88, P466, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.04.002
BETTIS RA, 1995, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V16, P5, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250160104
Bourdieu P., 1963, MEDITERRANEAN COUNTR
Burke D. K., 1969, GRAMMAR MOTIVES
Campbell J.L., 2004, I CHANGE GLOBALIZATI
Chalus-Sauvannet MC, 2016, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V54, P714, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12167
Charumilind C, 2006, J BUS, V79, P181, DOI 10.1086/497410
Cicchetti D., 1994, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENTS, V6, P284, DOI [10.1037/1040-
3590.6.4.284, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284]
Clancy CA, 2014, TIME SOC, V23, P28, DOI 10.1177/0961463X11425224
Clore G.L., 1994, HDB SOCIAL COGNITION
Dalpiaz E, 2014, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V38, P1375, DOI 10.1111/etap.12129
De Massis A, 2014, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V52, P344, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12102
De Massis A, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P10, DOI 10.1177/0894486512466258
Dehlen T, 2014, J BUS VENTURING, V29, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.10.001
DeNoble A, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P127, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00091.x
Desa G, 2013, STRATEG ENTREP J, V7, P26, DOI 10.1002/sej.1150
DeTienne DR, 2010, J BUS VENTURING, V25, P203, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.05.004
Di Domenico M, 2010, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V34, P681, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2010.00370.x
DIMAGGIO PJ, 1983, AM SOCIOL REV, V48, P147, DOI 10.2307/2095101
Dou JS, 2013, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V30, P893, DOI 10.1007/s10490-012-9287-7
Douglas M., 1986, I THINK
Dunn MB, 2010, ADMIN SCI QUART, V55, P114, DOI 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114
Duymedjian R, 2010, ORGAN STUD, V31, P133, DOI 10.1177/0170840609347051
Flaherty MG, 2003, SOC PSYCHOL QUART, V66, P17, DOI 10.2307/3090138
FORGAS JP, 1995, PSYCHOL BULL, V117, P39, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39
Fredrickson BL, 2005, COGNITION EMOTION, V19, P313, DOI
10.1080/02699930441000238
Fredrickson BL, 2001, AM PSYCHOL, V56, P218, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
Gallo M. A., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P303, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2004.00020.X
Gardiner N., 1937, FEELING EMOTION HIST
GARDNER WL, 1988, J MANAGE, V14, P321, DOI 10.1177/014920638801400210
Garud R, 2003, RES POLICY, V32, P277, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
Giddens A., 1990, CONSEQUENCES MODERNI
Goffman Erving, 1974, FRAME ANAL ESSAY ORG
HANDLER W. C., 1994, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V7, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00133.X
Handler W.C., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P361, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1988.00361.X
HANDLER W.C., 1990, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V15, P37, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879001500105
Heck R. K. Z., 1999, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V12, P309
Hendry C, 2011, RES POLICY, V40, P778, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.001
Holisti O. R., 1968, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL
Imai M., 2006, ASIAN ECON J, V20, P241, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8381.2006.00234.x
Jaques E., 1971, TIME SPAN HDB USE TI
KAHNEMAN D, 1986, J BUS, V59, pS285, DOI 10.1086/296367
KAYE K, 1996, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V9, P347
KITAYAMA S, 1995, PSYCHOL INQ, V6, P217, DOI 10.1207/s15327965pli0603_6
KRAIGER K, 1993, J APPL PSYCHOL, V78, P311, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311
Krippendorff K., 2004, CONTENT ANAL INTRO I
Lazarus R. S., 1988, COGNITION EMOTION, V2, P281, DOI DOI
10.1080/02699938808412701
Lee KS, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P657
Levi-Strauss Claude, 1966, SAVAGE MIND
Lumpkin GT, 2011, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V35, P1149, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2011.00495.x
Malik TH, 2019, SAGE OPEN, V9, DOI 10.1177/2158244019885135
March J.G., 1988, DECISIONS ORG
March J. G., 1999, PURSUIT ORG INTELLIG
March J.G., 1994, PRIMER DECISION MAKI
MARKUS HR, 1991, PSYCHOL REV, V98, P224, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
MATSUMOTO D, 1993, MOTIV EMOTION, V17, P107, DOI 10.1007/BF00995188
McMullen JS, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P1379, DOI 10.1111/etap.12178
Miller D, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P513, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
Ocasio W, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P187, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(199707)18:1+<187::AID-SMJ936>3.3.CO;2-B
Ocasio W., 2011, ORGAN SCI, V22, P1121, DOI DOI 10.1287/0RSC.1100.0602
Ocasio W, 2018, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V39, P155, DOI 10.1002/smj.2702
Podolny JM, 1997, AM SOCIOL REV, V62, P673, DOI 10.2307/2657354
Polanyi M., 2010, TACIT DIMENSION, P1967
PRESCOTT S, 1981, SOC BEHAV PERSONAL, V9, P23, DOI 10.2224/sbp.1981.9.1.23
Rafaeli A, 2013, ENTREP RES J, V3, P295, DOI 10.1515/erj-2013-0061
Reay T, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P105, DOI 10.1177/0894486511406427
Rogoff EG, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P559, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00009-0
Sauder M, 2012, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V38, P267, DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-
145503
Scott W., 2003, ORG RATIONAL NATURAL
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P293, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00084.x
Sharma P, 2014, SUCCESS TRANSGENERAT, P1
Sharma P, 2008, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V32, P763, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2008.00253.x
Shiller R., 2000, IRRATIONAL EXUBERANC
Shiller R. J., 2019, NARRATIVE EC STORIES
Smith CA, 2009, COGNITION EMOTION, V23, P1352, DOI 10.1080/02699930902860386
Suddaby R, 2005, ADMIN SCI QUART, V50, P35, DOI 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
Swedberg R., 2014, THEORIZING SOCIAL SC
Weber K, 2006, ORGAN STUD, V27, P1639, DOI 10.1177/0170840606068343
Weick K., 1995, SENSEMAKING ORG
WHETTEN DA, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P490, DOI 10.2307/258554
Wortman M. S., 1994, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V7, P3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00003.X
Yabushita NW, 2014, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V31, P997, DOI 10.1007/s10490-014-9388-6
NR 89
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU NOMOS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH & CO KG
PI BADEN-BADEN
PA WALDSEESTR 3 5, BADEN-BADEN, 76530, GERMANY
SN 0935-9915
J9 MANAG REVUE
JI Manag. Rev.
PY 2020
VL 31
IS 1
BP 55
EP 80
DI 10.5771/0935-9915-2020-1-55
PG 26
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA LJ1ZT
UT WOS:000529970900003
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Piccin, MB
AF Piccin, Marcos Botton
TI FAMILIES FROM THE RURAL PATRONAGE ELITE IN RIO GRANDE DO SUL: MEANS OF
SOCIAL AND CULTURAL INTERACTION, AND MARITAL AND SUCCESSION STRATEGIES
OF SOCIAL REPRODUCTION
SO REVISTA POS CIENCIAS SOCIAIS
LA Portuguese
DT Article
DE Rural patronage; Elites; Farmers; Marital strategies; Succession
strategies; Social reproduction
ID POWER
AB This article analyzes the main means of social and cultural interaction and the
marital and succession strategies of social reproduction of the elite which largely
owns extensive-cattle-breeding land in Rio Grande do Sul. The social and cultural
means of interaction, such as clubs or cultural and sportive associations are
fundamental for the reproduction of an elite habitus and the constitution of
marital strategies markedly endogamous to the group itself. The analysis of
succession strategies indicates that the size of inherited land assets is directly
dependent on the fertility rate of the families, as well as that the wealth formed
on the occasion of the marriage is dependent on the accomplishment of a good
marriage. The focus of the analysis are two generations that were born in the
twentieth century, the first between the years of 1900 and 1930, and the second
between 1920 to 1960, in which six lines of large proprietors are analyzed, making
99 marriages in total.
C1 [Piccin, Marcos Botton] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Programas Posgrad Extensao Rural,
Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
RP Piccin, MB (corresponding author), Univ Fed Santa Maria, Programas Posgrad
Extensao Rural, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
EM marcospiccin@gmail.com
CR ALVES A. C., 2017, C BRAS SOC 18 GT 33
ALVES A. C., 2017, DIMENSOES, V39, P220
BONNAIN R., 1992, TRANSMETTRE HERITER
BOURDIEU P, 1978, ACTES RECH SCI SOC, P3
Bourdieu P., 2002, BAL CELIBATAIRES CRI
Bourdieu P., 1989, NOBLESSE ETAT GRANDE
BOURDIEU Pierre, 2008, DISTINCAO CRITICA SO
 BOURDIEU Pierre, 2002, PODER SIMBOLICO
BOURDIEU Pierre, 1980, SENS PRATIQUE
BRUNO R., 2014, COMPOSICAO REV CIENC, V14, P85
BUHLER E. A., 2016, AGR EMPRESARIAIS ESP
CAMARGO O. J. R., 2009, THESIS
CANEDO L., 2002, PRO-POSICOES, V13, P169
COSTA F. F., 2019, THESIS
DA ROS C., 2012, TERRA PODER RIO GRAN
DENORD F., 2016, CONCERT PUISSANTS
FARINATTI Luis Augusto, 2010, CONFINS MERIDIONAIS
FREYRE Gilberto, 1987, CASA GRANDE E SENZAL
GARCIA A, 2007, CIENCIAS SOCIAIS, V2, P73
Garcia Junior A. R., 1989, CAMINHO ROCADO ESTRA
GOODY J, 1985, EVOLUTION FAMILLE MA
GRIJO L. A., 1998, THESIS
GRILL I. G., 2003, THESIS
HEINZ F. M., 1996, THESIS
Heredia Beatriz, 2010, Rev. bras. Ci. Soc., V25, P159, DOI 10.1590/S0102-
69092010000300010
LEWIN L., 1993, POLITICA PARENTELA P
MARTINS M. F., 2017, ACERVO, V30, P121
MARX Karl, 2011, 18 BRUMARIO L BONAPA
MEDEIROS L. T., 1969, PEAO ESTANCIA TIPO T
MONTEIRO J. M., 2017, 18 C BRAS SOC GRUP T
MOORE Jr B., 1983, ORIGENS SOCIAIS DITA
O IMPARCIAL, JORNAL
Offerle M., 2009, SOCIOLOGIE ORG PATRO
Pedroza Manoela, 2010, Anál. Social, P141
PICCIN M. B., 2014, ESTUD SOC AGR, V22, P253
PICCIN M. B., 2012, THESIS
Piccin MB, 2015, TEMPO SOC, V27, P305, DOI 10.1590/0103-20702015214
PIMENTEL F., 1941, ASPECTOS GERAIS SAO
Pincon M., 2006, GRANDES FORTUNES DYN
PINCON M., 2007, SOCIOLOGIE BOURGEOIS
Pincon-Charlot M, 2018, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V42, P115, DOI 10.1111/1468-
2427.12533
PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL DE SAO GABRIEL, 1959, FLOR POET PROS SAO G
RAMOS P., 2011, HIST EC HIST EMPRESA, VXIV, P7
SANTOS P. S. S., 2017, FAMILIAS AGRUPAMENTO
Sauer Sérgio, 2012, Rev. Econ. Sociol. Rural, V50, P503, DOI 10.1590/S0103-
20032012000300007
SEIDL E, 1999, THESIS
SILVA A. V. C., 1963, S GABRIEL HISTORIA D
STEINER P, 2006, SOCIOLOGIA EC
STOLCKE Verena, 1986, CAFEICULTURA HOMENS
Swedberg Richard, 2004, Tempo soc., V16, P7, DOI 10.1590/S0103-20702004000200001
VIRET JL, 2008, HIST SOC RURALES, V29, P165
ZALIO PA, 2004, GENESES, V56, P4
NR 52
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU UNIV FED MARANHAO, CENTRO CIENCIAS HUMANAS
PI SAN LUIS
PA PPGSOC, AV PORTUGUESES, NO 1966, PREDIO CCH BLOCO 6, TERREO SALA
3-CAMPUS UNIV BANCA, SAN LUIS, CEP65085-580, BRAZIL
SN 1983-4527
EI 2236-9473
J9 REV POS CIENC SOC
JI Rev. Pos Cienc. Soc.
PD JAN-JUN
PY 2020
VL 17
IS 33
BP 93
EP 123
PG 31
WC Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
SC Social Sciences - Other Topics
GA KG8YC
UT WOS:000510236300006
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Umans, I
Lybaert, N
Steijvers, T
Voordeckers, W
AF Umans, Ine
Lybaert, Nadine
Steijvers, Tensie
Voordeckers, Wim
TI Succession planning in family firms: family governance practices, board
of directors, and emotions
SO SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Family firms; Succession planning; Family governance practices; Board of
directors; Emotions
ID SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; SELF-REGULATION; BUSINESS; PERFORMANCE; CEO;
DIMENSIONS; LEADERSHIP; AGENCY; GOALS; PLANS
AB This study builds on implementation intention theory to indicate that both
business and family governance practices influence the succession planning process
in family firms. In addition, this study draws on goal adjustment theory to explore
whether the family CEO's emotions, being his or her inability to let go of the
family firm, hamper the governance decisions of the board of directors concerning
that succession planning process. Applying a moderated mediation analysis on a
sample of 225 family firms, results show that board involvement in the succession
process mediates the positive relationship between the use of family governance
practices and the level of succession planning. In addition, the family CEO's
inability to let go negatively moderates this mediating relationship which
signifies that emotions influence governance outcomes in family firms.
C1 [Umans, Ine; Lybaert, Nadine; Steijvers, Tensie; Voordeckers, Wim] Hasselt Univ,
Res Ctr Entrepreneurship & Family Firms RCEF, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
[Lybaert, Nadine] Univ Antwerp, Prinsstr 13, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
RP Umans, I (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Res Ctr Entrepreneurship & Family
Firms RCEF, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
EM ine.umans@uhasselt.be
RI Umans, Ine/AAG-2452-2020; Voordeckers, Wim/C-2239-2018; Steijvers,
Tensie/E-6253-2017
OI Umans, Ine/0000-0002-7889-9787; Voordeckers, Wim/0000-0001-7041-3933;
Steijvers, Tensie/0000-0001-6947-4421
CR Angie AD, 2011, COGNITION EMOTION, V25, P1393, DOI 10.1080/02699931.2010.550751
Aronoff CE, 2011, FAMILY BUSINESS GOVE
Arteaga R, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P320, DOI 10.1177/0894486517732438
 Baron RA, 2008, ACAD MANAGE REV, V33, P328
Barsade SG, 2002, ADMIN SCI QUART, V47, P644, DOI 10.2307/3094912
Basco R, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P82, DOI 10.1177/0894486508327824
Bee C, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.12.001
Berent-Braun MM, 2012, SMALL BUS ECON, V38, P103, DOI 10.1007/s11187-010-9269-4
Berrone P, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P258, DOI 10.1177/0894486511435355
Blumentritt T, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00062.x
Brenes ER, 2011, J BUS RES, V64, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.11.013
Brundin E, 2011, INT PERSPECTIVES FUT, P55
Brundin E., 2014, SAGE HDB FAMILY BUSI, P529, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446247556
Chua JH, 1999, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V32, P935, DOI [10.1177/104225879902300402.,
DOI 10.1177/104225879902300402.]
Daily CM, 1997, J MANAGE, V23, P97, DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90039-8
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
De Massis A, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P278, DOI 10.1177/0894486516656276
de Pontet SB, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P337
Eddleston KA, 2008, J BUS VENTURING, V23, P244, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.11.002
Filser M, 2013, MANAG RES REV, V36, P256, DOI 10.1108/01409171311306409
FINKELSTEIN S, 1992, ACAD MANAGE J, V35, P505, DOI 10.2307/256485
Fishbein M., 2010, PREDICTING CHANGING
Gagne M, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P292, DOI 10.1177/0894486511410688
Gallo M.A., 2005, FAMILY BUSINESS, P45
Gersick K. E., 2014, SAGE HDB FAMILY BUSI, P196, DOI [10.4135/9781446247556.n11,
DOI 10.4135/9781446247556]
Gilding M, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P299, DOI 10.1111/etap.12040
Gnan L, 2015, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V53, P355, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12070
Gollwitzer PM, 1999, AM PSYCHOL, V54, P493, DOI 10.1037//0003-066X.54.7.493
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2007, ADMIN SCI QUART, V52, P106, DOI 10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Harveston P.D., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P373
Hayes AF, 2013, INTRO MEDIATION MODE
Holt R, 2013, BUS HIST, V55, P892, DOI 10.1080/00076791.2012.744588
Huang TC, 1999, LONG RANGE PLANN, V32, P609, DOI 10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00077-1
Ibrahim A.B., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, VXIV, P245, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2001.00245.X
Kets de Vries M., 2003, EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT, V21, P707, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.EMJ.2003.09.009
Lane S, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P147, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00052.x
Lansberg I., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P119, DOI [10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00011-9, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x]
Lansberg I., 1999, SUCCEEDING GENERATIO
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Lefebvre MR, 2016, FUTURES, V75, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2015.10.010
Lievens J, 2004, GOVERNANCE FAMILIEBE
Locke EA, 2006, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V15, P265, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
8721.2006.00449.x
Lussier RN, 2012, J SMALL BUS ENTERP D, V19, P7, DOI 10.1108/14626001211196370
Maglio SJ, 2014, MOTIV EMOTION, V38, P620, DOI 10.1007/s11031-014-9407-4
MALONE SC, 1989, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V2, P341, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1989.tb00003.x
MANSFIELD ER, 1982, AM STAT, V36, P158, DOI 10.2307/2683167
Marshall JP, 2006, J BUS VENTURING, V21, P348, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.004
Martin H.F., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P91
Mathews T, 2015, SMALL BUS ECON, V45, P15, DOI 10.1007/s11187-015-9628-2
Melin L, 2007, STRATEG ORGAN, V5, P321, DOI 10.1177/1476127007079959
Michel A, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.10.005
Michiels A, 2015, SMALL BUS ECON, V44, P299, DOI 10.1007/s11187-014-9594-0
Miller D, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.x
 Miller D., 2005, MANAGING LONG RUN LE
Motwani J, 2006, INT SMALL BUS J, V24, P471, DOI 10.1177/0266242606067270
Mustakallio M., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P205, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00205.X
Neubauer F., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS ITS
Neugarten BL, 1996, MEANINGS AGE
Nunnaly J.C., 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY
Payne GT, 2009, J MANAGE STUD, V46, P704, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00819.x
Peterson P., 2011, J FAMILY BUSINESS ST, V2, P207
Pierce JL, 2001, ACAD MANAGE REV, V26, P298, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2001.4378028
Poza E., 2014, FAMILY BUSINESS
Rafaeli A, 2013, ENTREP RES J, V3, P295, DOI 10.1515/erj-2013-0061
Schulze WS, 2001, ORGAN SCI, V12, P99, DOI 10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
Sharma P, 2000, CAN J ADM SCI, V17, P233
Sharma P., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00001.X
Sharma P., 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V25, P17, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870102500302
Shepherd DA, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P151, DOI 10.1177/0894486516634943
Siebels JF, 2012, INT J MANAG REV, V14, P280, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
2370.2011.00317.x
Strike VM, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P156, DOI 10.1177/0894486511431257
Suarez K., 2004, INT J ENTREP BEHAV R, V10, P141
Suess J, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.02.001
Suess-Reyes J., 2017, J BUSINESS EC, V87, P749, DOI [10.1007/s11573, DOI
10.1007/S11573]
Sundaramurthy C, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2007.00110.x
Tajfel H.T., 1986, PSYCHOL INTERGROUP R, P7, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203505984-16
Uhlaner LM, 2007, SMALL BUS ECON, V29, P275, DOI 10.1007/s11187-006-9009-y
van den Heuvel J, 2006, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V14, P467, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
8683.2006.00519.x
Vandorpe G., 2016, KMO RAPPORT FINANCIE
Venter E, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P283, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00049.x
Weimer J., 1999, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V7, P152
Westhead P., 1998, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V23, P31, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879802300102
Wieber F, 2012, AM J PSYCHOL, V125, P275
Williams LJ, 2010, ORGAN RES METHODS, V13, P477, DOI 10.1177/1094428110366036
Wrosch C, 2003, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V29, P1494, DOI 10.1177/0146167203256921
Zattoni A, 2015, J MANAGE, V41, P1214, DOI 10.1177/0149206312463936
Zellweger TM, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P347, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00129.x
Zona F, 2016, SMALL BUS ECON, V47, P735, DOI 10.1007/s11187-016-9764-3
NR 88
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 13
U2 28
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0921-898X
EI 1573-0913
J9 SMALL BUS ECON
JI Small Bus. Econ. Group
PD JAN
PY 2020
VL 54
IS 1
BP 189
EP 207
DI 10.1007/s11187-018-0078-5
PG 19
WC Business; Economics; Management
SC Business & Economics
GA KJ2XM
UT WOS:000511921300009
OA Green Accepted
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Bertschi-Michel, A
Kammerlander, N
Strike, VM
AF Bertschi-Michel, Alexandra
Kammerlander, Nadine
Strike, Vanessa M.
TI Unearthing and Alleviating Emotions in Family Business Successions
SO ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE
LA English
DT Article
DE family business; advisor; emotions; succession; satisfaction
ID GRIEF RECOVERY; FAILURE; CONFLICT; MODEL
AB We follow one advisor and five family firm succession cases over 4 years to
capture emerging emotions during the succession process. Using inductive analysis,
we investigate how the advisor's mediation of these emotions affects individual-
level satisfaction with the succession process. Interviews, observation, meeting
minutes, and archival data reveal an iterative process: the advisor first unearths
the incumbent's and successor's emotions to surface emotional tensions before
alleviating them. Unearthing and alleviating emotions speeds role adjustments and
advances succession, especially when the incumbent becomes "stuck" in the process.
Emotion mediation and role adjustment appear to foster individual-level
satisfaction with the succession process.
C1 [Bertschi-Michel, Alexandra] Univ Bern, Engehaldenstr 4, CH-3012 Bern,
Switzerland.
[Kammerlander, Nadine] WHU Otto Beisheim Sch Management, Family Business,
Vallendar, Germany.
[Strike, Vanessa M.] Univ British Columbia, Sauder Sch Business, Appl Business
Family Studies, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
[Strike, Vanessa M.] Univ British Columbia, Sauder Sch Business, Business
Families Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
RP Bertschi-Michel, A (corresponding author), Univ Bern, Engehaldenstr 4, CH-3012
Bern, Switzerland.
EM alexandra.michel@iop.unibe.ch; nadine.kammerlander@whu.edu;
vanessa.strike@sauder.ubc.ca
OI Kammerlander, Nadine/0000-0002-7838-8792
CR Barbera F, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P271, DOI 10.1177/0894486513487198
Barsade SG, 2002, ADMIN SCI QUART, V47, P644, DOI 10.2307/3094912
Brundin E, 2008, CORP GOV-OXFORD, V16, P326, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
8683.2008.00688.x
Cardon MS, 2012, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V36, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2011.00501.x
Chua J. H. J. J., 1999, ENTREPRENEURSHIP THE, V23, P19, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879902300402
Cote S, 2005, ACAD MANAGE REV, V30, P509, DOI 10.5465/amr.2005.17293692
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
DYER W.G., 1994, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V19, P71, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879401900105
Eddleston KA, 2008, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V46, P456, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2008.00252.x
EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P532, DOI 10.2307/258557
Filser M, 2013, MANAG RES REV, V36, P256, DOI 10.1108/01409171311306409
Foo MD, 2011, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V35, P375, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2009.00357.x
Gross J.J., 1998, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V2, P271, DOI [10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271, DOI
10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271]
Gross JJ, 2013, EMOTION, V13, P359, DOI 10.1037/a0032135
HANDLER W. C., 1994, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V7, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00133.X
HANDLER W.C., 1990, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V15, P37, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879001500105
JICK TD, 1979, ADMIN SCI QUART, V24, P602, DOI 10.2307/2392366
Kellermanns FW, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2004.00040.x
Labaki R, 2013, ENTREP RES J, V3, P301, DOI 10.1515/erj-2013-0034
Lane S, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P147, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00052.x
Langley A, 2011, RES METHOD STRAT MAN, V6, P201, DOI 10.1108/S1479-
8387(2011)0000006007
Lansberg I., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P119, DOI [10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00011-9, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x]
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Locke K, 2011, ACAD MANAG ANN, V5, P613, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2011.593319
Michel A, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.10.005
Miller D, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P513, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
Obstfeld D, 2005, ADMIN SCI QUART, V50, P100, DOI 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100
RAFAELI A, 1987, ACAD MANAGE REV, V12, P23, DOI 10.2307/257991
Reddrop A, 2015, J FAM BUS MANAG, V5, P90, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-08-2014-0018
Rousseau DM, 1998, ACAD MANAGE REV, V23, P393, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
Salvato C, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P235, DOI 10.1177/0894486513490796
Sharma P, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P667, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00015-6
Sharma P., 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V25, P17, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870102500302
Sharma P. J. J., 1997, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V10, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1997.00001.X
Shepherd DA, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P318, DOI 10.2307/30040715
Shepherd DA, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P151, DOI 10.1177/0894486516634943
Shepherd DA, 2011, ACAD MANAGE J, V54, P1229, DOI 10.5465/amj.2010.0102
Shepherd DA, 2009, J BUS VENTURING, V24, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.09.003
Sonnenfeld J., 1991, HEROS FAREWELL WHAT
Sonnenfeld J. A., 1989, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V2, P355, DOI [10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00011-9, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9]
Stanley LJ, 2010, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V34, P1085, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2010.00414.x
Strauss A., 1990, BASICS QUALITATIVE R
Strike VM, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P80, DOI 10.1177/0894486517735169
Strike VM, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P880, DOI 10.5465/amj.2012.0665
Strike VM, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P293, DOI 10.1177/0894486513492547
Strike VM, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P156, DOI 10.1177/0894486511431257
Ward J. L., 1987, KEEPING FAMILY BUSIN
Yin R.K., 1994, CASE STUDY RES DESIG, V2nd ed.
NR 48
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 7
U2 22
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 1042-2587
EI 1540-6520
J9 ENTREP THEORY PRACT
JI Entrep. Theory Pract.
PD JAN
PY 2020
VL 44
IS 1
SI SI
BP 81
EP 108
DI 10.1177/1042258719834016
PG 28
WC Business
SC Business & Economics
GA JW2BV
UT WOS:000502864100004
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Werner, A
Schell, S
Haunschild, L
AF Werner, Arndt
Schell, Sabrina
Haunschild, Ljuba
TI How does a succession influence investment decisions, credit financing
and business performance in small and medium-sized family firms?
SO INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Family business; SME; Succession event; Investments; Performance;
Financial constraints
ID INTERGENERATIONAL SUCCESSION; ENTREPRENEURIAL EXIT; INTRA-FAMILY;
CHOICE; AGENCY; PERSPECTIVE; COMMITMENT; GOVERNANCE
AB We examine the influence of succession in small and medium-sized family
businesses by focusing on investment decisions, credit financing, and business
performance. Using data on German SMEs, we find that the succession event affects
investment behaviornegativelybefore butpositivelyafter the transfer takes place
when compared to firms without any succession intentions. With respect to
performance, we show that firms' growth rates increase after succession has taken
place. Although hypothesized, we find no empirical evidence to suggest that banks
tend to reject successors more often than they reject other business owners when
deciding to extend credit to firms for investment purposes.
C1 [Werner, Arndt] Univ Siegen, Management & Entrepreneurship, Unteres Schloss 3,
D-57072 Siegen, Germany.
[Schell, Sabrina] Univ Bern, Inst Org & Human Resource Management, Engehaldenstr
4, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.
[Haunschild, Ljuba] Inst Mittelstandsforsch Bonn IfM, Maximilianstr 20, D-53111
Bonn, Germany.
RP Werner, A (corresponding author), Univ Siegen, Management & Entrepreneurship,
Unteres Schloss 3, D-57072 Siegen, Germany.
EM Arndt.werner@uni-siegen.de; sabrina.schell@iop.unibe.ch
CR Ahrens JP, 2019, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V43, P437, DOI 10.1177/1042258718816290
Ajzen I, 1985, INTENTION ACTION THE
AKERLOF GA, 1970, Q J ECON, V84, P488, DOI 10.2307/1879431
 Backes-Gellner U, 2007, SMALL BUS ECON, V29, P173, DOI 10.1007/s11187-006-0016-9
Barach J.A., 1995, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V8, P131, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1995.00131.X
Barach J. A., 1988, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V26, P49
Basco R., 2017, J BUSINESS EC, V87, P487, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11573-016-0828-2
Bennedsen M, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P647, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
Binks MR, 1996, SMALL BUS ECON, V8, P17, DOI 10.1007/BF00391972
Bjuggren PO, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P305, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00050.x
Bocatto E, 2010, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V48, P497, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2010.00306.x
Cabrera-Suarez K., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P37, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2001.00037.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00037.X]
Cadieux L, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00089.x
Carr JC, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P1197, DOI 10.1111/etap.12240
Chrisman JJ, 2012, ACAD MANAGE J, V55, P976, DOI 10.5465/amj.2011.0211
Cressy R, 1996, SMALL BUS ECON, V8, P397, DOI 10.1007/BF00389557
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
Davis P. S., 1999, FAM BUS REV, V12, P311, DOI [10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9,
DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1999.00311.X, 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00311.x.]
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
De Massis A, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P278, DOI 10.1177/0894486516656276
Dehlen T, 2014, J BUS VENTURING, V29, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.10.001
DeTienne DR, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P1297, DOI 10.1111/etap.12067
DeTienne DR, 2010, J BUS VENTURING, V25, P203, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.05.004
Diwisch DS, 2009, SMALL BUS ECON, V32, P45, DOI 10.1007/s11187-007-9072-z
Dyer WG, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P253, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00074.x
Felden B, 2008, UNTERNEHMENNACHFOLGE
Giambatista RC, 2005, LEADERSHIP QUART, V16, P963, DOI
10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.005
Gilding M, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P299, DOI 10.1111/etap.12040
Habbershon T.G., 1999, FAM BUS REV, V12, P1, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1999.00001.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1999.00001.X]
HANDLER W. C., 1994, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V7, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00133.X
Handler W.C., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P361, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1988.00361.X
Harvey M., 1995, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V8, P3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1995.00003.X
Hauck J, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.11.002
Hillier D, 2018, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V42, P259, DOI 10.1177/1042258717748933
Jaskiewicz P, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P781, DOI 10.1111/etap.12146
Jaskiewicz P, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P121, DOI 10.1177/0894486512470841
Kammerlander N, 2016, INT SMALL BUS J, V34, P189, DOI 10.1177/0266242614541287
Kaye K., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P151, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2004.00010.X
Kimhi A, 1997, SMALL BUS ECON, V9, P309, DOI 10.1023/A:1007987731337
Koropp C, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V41, P315, DOI 10.1007/s11187-012-9442-z
Kotlar J, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P1263, DOI 10.1111/etap.12065
Lambrecht J, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P267, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00048.x
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Le Breton-Miller I, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P1391, DOI
10.1111/etap.12072
Lee KS, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P657
Lubatkin MH, 2005, J ORGAN BEHAV, V26, P313, DOI 10.1002/job.307
Madison K, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P65, DOI 10.1177/0894486515594292
McMullen JS, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P1379, DOI 10.1111/etap.12178
Miller D, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P513, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
Miller D., 2011, J FAMILY BUSINESS ST, V2, P232, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JFBS.2011.10
 Miller D, 2007, J CORP FINANC, V13, P829, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004
Molly V, 2010, FAM BUS REV, V23, P131, DOI 10.1177/0894486510365062
Nordqvist M, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V40, P1087, DOI 10.1007/s11187-012-9466-4
Olbrich M, 2005, UNTERNEHMENSNACHFOLG
Parker SC, 2016, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V40, P1241, DOI 10.1111/etap.12242
Pyromalis Vassilios D., 2009, International Entrepreneurship and Management
Journal, V5, P439, DOI 10.1007/s11365-009-0118-3
Schell S, 2018, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V9, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.08.003
Schulze WS, 2003, ACAD MANAGE J, V46, P179, DOI 10.2307/30040613
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00001.X
SHEPHERD DA, 2000, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V24, P25, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870002400402
Sonfield M. C., 2004, FAM BUS REV, V17, P189, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2004.00013.x., DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2004.00013.X]
Steier L., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P259, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2001.00259.X
Stewart A, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P58, DOI 10.1177/0894486511421665
STIGLITZ JE, 1981, AM ECON REV, V71, P393
Ward J. L., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P105, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1988.00105.X
Ward JL, 2011, KEEPING FAMILY BUSIN
Wennberg K, 2011, STRATEG ENTREP J, V5, P352, DOI 10.1002/sej.118
Williams R.I, 2018, INT J MANAG REV, V20, P63
Wooldridge J. M., 2002, INTRO ECONOMETRICS M
Xi J, 2015, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V11, P113, DOI 10.1007/s11365-013-0286-z
Yu A, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P33, DOI 10.1177/0894486511430329
Zellweger T, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P1281, DOI 10.1111/etap.12182
Zellweger T, 2011, J BUS VENTURING, V26, P521, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.04.001
NR 74
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1554-7191
EI 1555-1938
J9 INT ENTREP MANAG J
JI Int. Entrep. Manag. J.
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 17
IS 1
BP 423
EP 446
DI 10.1007/s11365-019-00613-5
EA DEC 2019
PG 24
WC Business; Management
SC Business & Economics
GA QG5YY
UT WOS:000574463400001
DA 2021-03-01
ER
PT J
AU Gagne, M
Marwick, C
de Pontet, SB
Wrosch, C
AF Gagne, Marylene
Marwick, Connor
Brun de Pontet, Stephanie
Wrosch, Carsten
TI Family Business Succession: What's Motivation Got to Do With It?
SO FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE family business; succession; intrinsic motivation; trust; autonomy
support
ID SELF-DETERMINATION; AUTONOMY SUPPORT; TRUST; COMMITMENT; BEHAVIOR;
TRUSTWORTHINESS; ANTECEDENTS; PERSONALITY; INTENTIONS; PREDICTORS
AB Family businesses represent 80% of global business structures, but the low rate
of successful transgenerational succession can have drastic implications for
employees and local economies. A 12-year longitudinal study of 89 Canadian family
businesses revealed that successors' confidence and perceptions of incumbent
support predicted successor intrinsic motivation to take over the business, which
in turn predicted whether the business was successfully transferred 12 years later.
Incumbent support and intrinsic motivation mediated the relation between incumbent
trust in the successor and successful business succession. This study demonstrates
the dual importance of incumbent and successor psychological states in determining
succession outcomes.
C1 [Gagne, Marylene] Curtin Univ, Future Work Inst, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845,
Australia.
[Marwick, Connor] TransLink, Org Dev Profess, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
[Brun de Pontet, Stephanie] Family Business Consulting Grp, Chicago, IL USA.
[Wrosch, Carsten] Concordia Univ, Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
RP Gagne, M (corresponding author), Curtin Univ, Future Work Inst, GPO Box U1987,
Perth, WA 6845, Australia.
EM marylene.gagne@curtin.edu.au
RI Gagne, Marylene/H-4957-2013
OI Gagne, Marylene/0000-0003-3248-8947
FU Social Science and Humanities Research Council of CanadaSocial Sciences
and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
FX The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the
research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project
was supported by a grant from the Social Science and Humanities Research
Council of Canada.
CR Barach J.A., 1995, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V8, P131, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1995.00131.X
Benson B., 1990, FAMILY BUSINESS SUCC
Bjuggren PO, 2002, SMALL BUS ECON, V19, P123, DOI 10.1023/A:1016289106477
Blais MR., 1993, REV QUEBECOISE PSYCH, V14, P185, DOI DOI 10.1037//0033-
2909.107.2.238
BURGER JM, 1992, DESIRE CONTROL PERSO
Cardinal LB, 2004, ORGAN SCI, V15, P411, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1040.0084
Carsrud A. L., 1994, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V19, P39
Chrisman J. J., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V11, P19, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1998.00019.X]
Colquitt JA, 2007, J APPL PSYCHOL, V92, P909, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909
Cooper D, 2018, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V42, P340, DOI 10.1177/1042258717749238
Cruz CC, 2010, ACAD MANAGE J, V53, P69, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48036975
 Dawson A, 2014, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V23, P570, DOI
10.1080/1359432X.2013.781155
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
De Massis A, 2018, FAM BUS REV, V31, P386, DOI 10.1177/0894486518803422
De Massis A, 2014, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V52, P344, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12102
de Pontet SB, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P337
Deci EL, 1999, PSYCHOL BULL, V125, P627, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
Deci EL, 2000, PSYCHOL INQ, V11, P227, DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deloitte & Touche Centre for Tax Education and Research, 1999, AR CAN FAM BUS
END S
DEUTSCH M, 1960, HUM RELAT, V13, P123, DOI 10.1177/001872676001300202
Dyer W. G., 1986, CULTURAL CHANGE FAMI
Dysvik A, 2013, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V43, P1050, DOI 10.1111/jasp.12068
Enders K., 2010, APPL MISSING DATA AN
Evert RE, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P17, DOI 10.1177/0894486515593869
Funder DC, 2019, ADV METHODS PRACT PS, V2, P156, DOI DOI
10.1177/2515245919847202
Gagne M, 2005, J ORGAN BEHAV, V26, P331, DOI 10.1002/job.322
Gagne M., 2018, INT J MANAG REV, V20, pS83, DOI [10.1111/ijmr.12159, DOI
10.1111/IJMR.12159]
Gagne M, 2014, OXFORD HDB EMPLOYEE
Gagne M, 2014, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V23, P643, DOI 10.1080/1359432X.2014.906403
Gagne M, 2015, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V24, P178, DOI 10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892
Gagne M, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P292, DOI 10.1177/0894486511410688
Gagne M, 2008, PSYCHOL BELG, V48, P219, DOI 10.5334/pb-48-2-3-219
Garcia PRJM, 2019, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V43, P224, DOI 10.1177/1042258718796087
Goldberg S. D., 1993, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V6, P55, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1993.00055.X
Gomez C, 2001, GROUP ORGAN MANAGE, V26, P53, DOI 10.1177/1059601101261004
Handler W. C., 1992, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V5, P283, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1992.00283.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1992.00283.X]
Judge TA, 2002, J APPL PSYCHOL, V87, P797, DOI 10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.797
Kotlar J, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P1263, DOI 10.1111/etap.12065
KPMG, 2010, FAM BUS AUSTR SURV N
KPMG, 2009, KPMG FAM BUS AUSTR S
Landry R, 2008, MOTIV EMOTION, V32, P173, DOI 10.1007/s11031-008-9092-2
Lee K, 2004, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V39, P329, DOI 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
Long R. G., 2014, SAGE HDB FAMILY BUSI, P249
MAYER RC, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P709, DOI 10.2307/258792
MCALLISTER DJ, 1995, ACAD MANAGE J, V38, P24, DOI 10.2307/256727
McMullen JS, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P1379, DOI 10.1111/etap.12178
MGI, 2006, MGI FAM PRIV BUS SUR
Morris MH, 1997, J BUS VENTURING, V12, P385, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00010-4
Muthen L. K., 2015, MPLUS COMPREHENSIVE
Neubauer H., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P269, DOI DOI
10.1177/08944865030160040501
Neutgarten B. L., 1979, AM J PSYCHIAT, V41, P3
Pearson AW, 2011, FAMILY BUSINESS AND SOCIAL CAPITAL, P33
Podsakoff PM, 2012, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V63, P539, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-
120710-100452
PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2014, FAM BUS SURV 2014 AU
Ryan R. M., 2017, SELF DETERMINATION T
Schoorman F. D., 2016, J TRUST RES, V6, P74
Schroder E, 2013, J VOCAT BEHAV, V83, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.07.006
Sharma P, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P667, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00015-6
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P., 2014, SAGE HDB FAMILY BUSI, P1
Sheeran P, 2016, SOC PERSONAL PSYCHOL, V10, P503, DOI 10.1111/spc3.12265
 Slemp GR, 2018, MOTIV EMOTION, V42, P706, DOI 10.1007/s11031-018-9698-y
Spreitzer GM, 1999, GROUP ORGAN MANAGE, V24, P155, DOI 10.1177/1059601199242003
Stavrou ET, 2003, INT SMALL BUS J, V21, P331, DOI 10.1177/02662426030213005
Steier L., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P353, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2001.00353.x
TVERSKY A, 1974, SCIENCE, V185, P1124, DOI 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Van den Broeck A, 2016, J MANAGE, V42, P1195, DOI 10.1177/0149206316632058
van der Merwe S, 2010, S AFR J ECON MANAG S, V13, P293, DOI
10.4102/sajems.v13i3.101
Ward J. L., 1987, KEEPING FAMILY BUSIN
Weibel A, 2007, GROUP ORGAN MANAGE, V32, P500, DOI 10.1177/1059601106293961
Williams GC, 1996, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V70, P115, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.115
ZAND DE, 1972, ADMIN SCI QUART, V17, P229, DOI 10.2307/2393957
Zellweger T., 2017, MANAGING FAMILY BUSI
Zellweger T, 2011, J BUS VENTURING, V26, P521, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.04.001
Zellweger TM, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P851, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
NR 75
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 6
U2 7
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0894-4865
EI 1741-6248
J9 FAM BUS REV
JI Fam. Bus. Rev.
AR 0894486519894759
DI 10.1177/0894486519894759
EA DEC 2019
PG 14
WC Business
SC Business & Economics
GA LQ2GS
UT WOS:000534827900001
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Zagata, L
Lostak, M
Swain, N
AF Zagata, Lukas
Lostak, Michal
Swain, Nigel
TI Family Farm Succession of the First Post-Socialist Generation in the
Czech Republic
SO EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRYSIDE
LA English
DT Article
DE agriculture; succession gap; qualitative study; endogenous factors;
motivation
ID AGRICULTURE; RETIREMENT; PRIVATIZATION; POLITICS; FATHERS; SONS
AB The main goal of the paper is to provide insights into the family succession
processes in terms of the first inter-generational renewal that has been re-started
in the Czech agricultural sector. We want to understand how major transformation
processes (i.e., collectivisation, restitution, the post-socialist economic
transformation and EU membership) constituted social structures that framed inter-
generational change on Czech farms. Such a framework includes the "farm succession
gap" that has resulted from the long-term societal changes and that is still
reflected in the ongoing succession processes.
C1 [Zagata, Lukas; Lostak, Michal] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Econ &
Management, Dept Humanities, Prague, Czech Republic.
[Swain, Nigel] Univ Liverpool, Sch Hist Languages & Cultures, Dept Hist,
Liverpool, Merseyside, England.
RP Zagata, L (corresponding author), Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Econ &
Management, Dept Humanities, Prague, Czech Republic.
RI Zagata, Lukas/B-2872-2013
OI Zagata, Lukas/0000-0002-0170-8516; Lostak, Michal/0000-0003-0392-0702
FU Czech University of Life Sciences Prague; Project "Ageing population of
farmers and farm succession in the Czech agrarian sector" [CIGA
20141016]
FX The study was funded by the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague.
The paper is an outcome of the Project "Ageing population of farmers and
farm succession in the Czech agrarian sector'' (CIGA 20141016).
CR Beck U, 1994, REFLEXIVE MODERNIZAT
Berger P. L., 1967, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
Bezemer DJ, 2002, EUROPE-ASIA STUD, V54, P1301, DOI 10.1080/0966813022000025899
Bika Z, 2007, SOCIOL RURALIS, V47, P246, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00436.x
Blaha A. I., 1925, SOCIOLOGIE SEDLAKA D
Brandth B, 2013, SOCIOL RURALIS, V53, P95, DOI 10.1111/soru.12003
Calus M, 2008, SOCIOL RURALIS, V48, P38, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00448.x
Chiswell HM, 2018, SOCIOL RURALIS, V58, P104, DOI 10.1111/soru.12138
CZSO, 2016, REG YB
Duesberg S, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V61, P526, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.007
EP, 2014, CAP 2014 2020 TOOLS
Errington A., 2002, 10 EAAE C EXPL DIV E
European Commission (EC), 2013, OV CAP REF 2014 2020
Fischer H, 2014, SOCIOL RURALIS, V54, P417, DOI 10.1111/soru.12055
Galla K., 1939, DOLNI ROVEN SOCIOLOG
Gasson Ruth., 1993, FARM FAMILY BUSINESS
Haan H., 1994, THESIS
HUDECKOVA H, 1992, SOCIOL RURALIS, V32, P287, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
9523.1992.tb00933.x
Hudeckova H, 1995, SOCIOL CAS, V31, P449
HUDECKOVA H, 2004, JIHOMORAVSKY VENKOV, P258
Hudeckova H., 1995, EAST EUR COUNTRYSIDE, V2, P81
Hudeckovaa H., 1995, Zemedelska Ekonomika, V41, P477
Hurtikova I., 1996, AGROCENZUS 1995 1 CA
HUTSON J, 1987, SOCIOLOGY, V21, P215, DOI 10.1177/0038038587021002004
KEATING NC, 1989, FAM RELAT, V38, P215, DOI 10.2307/583678
KEATING NC, 1994, RURAL SOCIOL, V59, P720, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-
0831.1994.tb00557.x
Lobley M, 2010, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V1, P49, DOI 10.5304/jafscd.2010.011.009
LOSTAK M, 2004, JIHOMORAVSKY VENKOV, P177
LOSTAK M, 1999, AGR ECON-CZECH, V45, P481
Majerova V., 1993, Economic behaviour of family households in an international
context - resource income and allocation in urban and rural, in farm and nonfarm
households., P100
Majerova V., 1991, Sociologie Venkova a Zemedelstvi, V27, P103
Mann S, 2007, AGR HUM VALUES, V24, P435, DOI 10.1007/s10460-007-9087-8
Matthews A., 2013, 2013 WASTING MONEY Y
Maurell M-C., 1998, EAST EUR COUNTRYSIDE, V4, P19
Meurs M., 2001, EVOLUTION AGRARIAN I
MZe, 2016, VYR ZPRAV IMPL PROGR
 North D. C., 1990, I I CHANGE EC PERFOR
Pospech P, 2014, J RURAL STUD, V34, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.006
POTTER C, 1992, J RURAL STUD, V8, P133, DOI 10.1016/0743-0167(92)90072-E
Potter C, 1996, SOCIOL RURALIS, V36, P286, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
9523.1996.tb00023.x
Riley M, 2014, J RURAL STUD, V36, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.09.003
Silvasti T, 2003, AGR HUM VALUES, V20, P143, DOI 10.1023/A:1024021811419
Sottomayor M., 2011, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food,
V18, P121
Swain N, 1999, EUROPE-ASIA STUD, V51, P1199, DOI 10.1080/09668139998507
Swain N., 2013, GREEN BARONS FORCE C
Swain N, 2007, SOC HIST, V32, P1, DOI 10.1080/03071020601081231
Swain N, 2014, AM HIST REV, V119, P637, DOI 10.1093/ahr/119.2.637
Szelenyi S, 1995, THEOR SOC, V24, P697, DOI 10.1007/BF00993403
Taylor JE, 1998, RURAL SOCIOL, V63, P553, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1998.tb00692.x
Villa M, 1999, SOCIOL RURALIS, V39, P328, DOI 10.1111/1467-9523.00111
Zagata L, 2015, J RURAL STUD, V38, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.003
Zemedelec, 2012, JEDNODUSSI PODMINKY
NR 52
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 3
U2 10
PU WYDAWNICTWO UNIWERSYTETU MIKOLAJA KOPERNIKA
PI TORUN
PA UL. GAGARINA 39, TORUN, 87-100, POLAND
SN 1232-8855
J9 EAST EUR COUNTRYSIDE
JI East. Eur. Countrys.
PD DEC
PY 2019
VL 25
IS 1
BP 9
EP 35
DI 10.12775/EEC.2019.001
PG 27
WC Sociology
SC Sociology
GA KE6HP
UT WOS:000508655400001
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Carney, M
Zhao, J
Zhu, LM
AF Carney, Michael
Zhao, Jing
Zhu, Limin
TI Lean innovation: Family firm succession and patenting strategy in a
dynamic institutional landscape
SO JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS STRATEGY
LA English
DT Article
DE FFs; Succession; Intellectual property protection; Patents; Upper
echelons
ID RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH;
 TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS; PRODUCT INNOVATION;
UPPER ECHELONS; FOUNDER FIRMS; TRANSITION; ENTREPRENEURS; ORGANIZATION
AB The paper is motivated by recent findings about family firms (FFs) ability to
'do more with less' in the innovation process, which we dub 'lean innovation'. We
consider lean innovation patenting strategies in an emerging market context that is
undergoing improvement in its intellectual property protection (IPP) regime.
Grounded in upper echelons theory we expect that the initiation of an intra-family
succession will lead to generational shift in a FFs approach to IPP, as evinced in
its patenting strategy. Applying a difference in difference methodology we are able
to compare FFs who have undertaken an intra-family succession with FFs who have not
yet initiated a succession process. Further, we consider the second difference as a
strategy change between the pre- and post-succession period thereby isolating the
effects of the post-succession change on patenting strategy. We also distinguish
between different patent types (invention, utility, and design), and consider FF
propensity to patent, and patent conversion rates. Based on generational
differences between founders and successors we find successors are significant
adopters of lean innovation patenting strategies. We add to the sparse literature
on succession in emerging market FFs and contribute to improved understandings of
long-term FF strategic adaptation in a dynamic institutional landscape.
C1 [Carney, Michael] Concordia Univ, John Molson Sch Business, Montreal, PQ,
Canada.
[Zhao, Jing; Zhu, Limin] Renmin Univ China, Beijing, Peoples R China.
RP Carney, M (corresponding author), Concordia Univ, John Molson Sch Business,
Montreal, PQ, Canada.
EM Michael.Carney@Concordia.ca; zhaojing@rbs.org.cn; zhulimin123@ruc.edu.cn
FU Chinese National Natural Science FoundationNational Natural Science
Foundation of China (NSFC) [71472176, 71372200]; Renmin University of
China Research Foundation [2017030057]; Canadian Social Science and
Humanities Research Council
FX This research is funded by Chinese National Natural Science Foundation,
project number 71472176 and 71372200 and also funded by Renmin
University of China Research Foundation, project number 2017030057. The
first author was also funded by the Canadian Social Science and
Humanities Research Council.
CR ALFORD WILLIAM P., 1995, STEAL BOOK IS ELEGAN
Allen F, 2005, J FINANC ECON, V77, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.010
Armanios DE, 2017, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V38, P1373, DOI 10.1002/smj.2575
Banno M, 2016, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V7, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.07.002
Bennedsen M, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P647, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
Block JH, 2013, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V4, P270, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.10.003
Block J, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P180, DOI 10.1177/0894486513477454
Block JH, 2012, J BUS VENTURING, V27, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.003
Bloom N, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P1351, DOI 10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1351
Boeker W, 1997, ACAD MANAGE J, V40, P152, DOI 10.2307/257024
Brouwer E, 1999, RES POLICY, V28, P615, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00003-7
Bushee BJ, 1998, ACCOUNT REV, V73, P305
Cao J, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V33, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.005
Carney M., 2003, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, V20, P5, DOI
10.1023/A:1022062428231
Chen CJP, 2011, J CORP FINANC, V17, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.09.009
Chen HL, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P347, DOI 10.1177/0894486509341062
Chen RY, 2017, J CORP FINANC, V42, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.09.001
Chen W., 2007, MANAGEMENT ORG REV, V3, P55
Chrisman JJ, 2015, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V32, P310, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12207
Chrisman JJ, 2012, ACAD MANAGE J, V55, P976, DOI 10.5465/amj.2011.0211
Chung CN, 2008, ORGAN SCI, V19, P124, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1070.0272
Classen N, 2014, SMALL BUS ECON, V42, P595, DOI 10.1007/s11187-013-9490-z
Cucculelli M, 2016, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V7, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.02.001
Daily C.M., 1992, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V30, P25
 Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
De Massis A, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P278, DOI 10.1177/0894486516656276
De Massis A, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P189, DOI 10.1177/0894486515622722
De Massis A, 2016, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V30, P93, DOI 10.5465/amp.2015.0017
Deng ZL, 2013, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V30, P717, DOI 10.1007/s10490-012-9301-0
Dieguez-Soto J, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P327, DOI 10.1177/0894486516646917
Dou JS, 2013, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V30, P893, DOI 10.1007/s10490-012-9287-7
Duran P, 2016, ACAD MANAGE J, V59, P1224, DOI 10.5465/amj.2014.0424
Fainshmidt S., 2016, J WORLD BUSINESS
Finkelstein S, 2009, STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP
Ghorbani M, 2016, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V33, P881, DOI 10.1007/s10490-016-9472-1
Girma S, 2007, J INT ECON, V72, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.07.006
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2014, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V38, P1351, DOI 10.1111/etap.12083
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2011, ACAD MANAG ANN, V5, P653, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2011.593320
Gonzalez X, 2008, RES POLICY, V37, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.009
Gorg H, 2007, ECONOMICA, V74, P215, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00547.x
Gruhn B, 2017, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V41, P591, DOI [10.1111/etap.12239,
10.1111/etp.12239]
HAMBRICK DC, 1984, ACAD MANAGE REV, V9, P193, DOI 10.2307/258434
Hambrick DC, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P334, DOI 10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
Hauck J, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.11.002
Hobday M, 2004, RES POLICY, V33, P1433, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.005
Hu AG, 2009, J DEV ECON, V90, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.11.004
Huang C., 2017, MANAGEMENT ORG REV, P1
Nieto MJ, 2015, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V53, P382, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12075
Kellermanns FW, 2012, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V36, P1175, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2012.00544.x
Leitterstorf MP, 2014, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V35, P751, DOI 10.1002/smj.2236
Levine R, 1999, J FINANC INTERMED, V8, P8, DOI 10.1006/jfin.1998.0255
Luo JH, 2013, MANAGE ORGAN REV, V9, P265, DOI 10.1111/more.12000
Mathews J. A., 2006, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, V23, P5, DOI
10.1007/s10490-006-6113-0
Matzler K, 2015, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V32, P319, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12202
McConaughy D.L., 1998, REV FINANCIAL EC VOL, V7, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1058-
3300(99)80142-6
Meyer MW, 2008, MANAGE ORGAN REV, V4, P157, DOI 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00112.x
MILLER D, 1991, MANAGE SCI, V37, P34, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.37.1.34
Minichilli A, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P205, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2009.00888.x
Morck R., 2000, CONCENTRATED CORPORA
NEE V, 1992, ADMIN SCI QUART, V37, P1, DOI 10.2307/2393531
Peng MW, 2017, MANAGE ORGAN REV, V13, P15, DOI 10.1017/mor.2016.53
Peng YS, 2004, AM J SOCIOL, V109, P1045, DOI 10.1086/382347
Petersen MA, 2009, REV FINANC STUD, V22, P435, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhn053
Quigley TJ, 2012, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V33, P834, DOI 10.1002/smj.1945
Redding G., 1990, SPIRIT CHINESE CAPIT
Rod I, 2016, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V7, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.08.004
Schultz A., 2015, ASIAN FAMILIES SLOW
Sharma P. J. J., 1997, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V10, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1997.00001.X
Steier LP, 2009, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V26, P513, DOI 10.1007/s10490-008-9117-0
TEECE DJ, 1986, RES POLICY, V15, P285, DOI 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
Tretbar T., 2016, FAMILY BUSINESS COMP
Tsui-Auch LS, 2004, J MANAGE STUD, V41, P693, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2004.00450.x
van Essen M, 2012, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V29, P873, DOI 10.1007/s10490-011-9269-1
Wang T, 2015, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V32, P685, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12152
Wasserman N, 2003, ORGAN SCI, V14, P149, DOI 10.1287/orsc.14.2.149.14995
Williamson PJ, 2010, LONG RANGE PLANN, V43, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.008
 Xu D, 2014, ADMIN SCI QUART, V59, P517, DOI 10.1177/0001839214541866
Yamakawa Y, 2008, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V32, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2007.00216.x
Zhang JJ, 2009, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V26, P119, DOI 10.1007/s10490-008-9099-y
Zhu YM, 2012, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V29, P1131, DOI 10.1007/s10490-011-9263-7
NR 80
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 9
U2 18
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1877-8585
J9 J FAM BUS STRATEG
JI J. Fam. Bus. Strateg.
PD DEC
PY 2019
VL 10
IS 4
AR 100247
DI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.03.002
PG 13
WC Business; Management
SC Business & Economics
GA KA2RS
UT WOS:000505645600002
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Manji, W
AF Manji, Wasim
TI Commentary on "Lean innovation: Family firm succession and patenting
strategy in a dynamic institutional landscape"
SO JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS STRATEGY
LA English
DT Editorial Material
C1 [Manji, Wasim] Mini Grp Co, Nairobi, Kenya.
RP Manji, W (corresponding author), Mini Grp Co, Nairobi, Kenya.
NR 0
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 3
U2 6
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1877-8585
J9 J FAM BUS STRATEG
JI J. Fam. Bus. Strateg.
PD DEC
PY 2019
VL 10
IS 4
AR 100311
DI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100311
PG 2
WC Business; Management
SC Business & Economics
GA KA2RS
UT WOS:000505645600003
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Chen, JQ
Zhou, FZ
He, ZF
Fu, H
AF Chen, Jiaqi
Zhou, Fangzhao
He, Zhifang
Fu, Hui
TI Second-generation Succession and the Financialization of Assets: An
Empirical Study of Chinese Family Firms
SO EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE
LA English
DT Article
DE Family firms; second generation succession; financialization of assets;
firm performance
ID CORPORATE-OWNERSHIP; PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS; STEWARDSHIP; CONSTRAINTS;
GOVERNANCE; DECISIONS; RELIGION; AGENCY; CEOS
AB This research examines whether intra-family leadership succession in Chinese
family firms influences the decision to allocate more financial assets, the factors
that influence second-generation successors in making such decisions, and their
impacts on firm performance. The study collected firm and CEO data in which second-
generation CEOs' characteristics were captured, and the findings suggest second-
generational involvement is a critical factor in the financialization of assets.
Furthermore, the study finds that second-generation CEOs' characteristics, market
competition, and financing constraints have significant effects on second-
generation successors when making asset-allocating decisions, and this is
particularly true for financing constraints due to capital reserve motivations. The
study finds no significant relationship between the financialization of assets in
second-generation family firms and the family firms' performance. This implies that
firm innovation does not mean to neglect primary operating business. The results
are robust after considering possible endogeneity issues and to various
specifications of variables.
C1 [Chen, Jiaqi; Zhou, Fangzhao; He, Zhifang; Fu, Hui] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Business,
1800 Lihu Rd, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
RP Zhou, FZ (corresponding author), Jiangnan Univ, Sch Business, 1800 Lihu Rd, Wuxi
214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM traveloguezfz@qq.com
OI He, Zhifang/0000-0001-8975-3751; Chen, Jiaqi/0000-0001-8049-5039
FU Chinese Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science
[17YJC790008]; Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and
Universities in Jiangsu Province [2017SJB0812]; Fundamental Research
Fund for the Central Universities [2019JDZD16]
FX This work was supported by the [Chinese Ministry of Education of
Humanities and Social Science] under Grant [number 17YJC790008];
[Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in
Jiangsu Province] under Grant [number 2017SJB0812]; and [Fundamental
Research Fund for the Central Universities] under Grant [number
2019JDZD16].
CR Aldrich HE, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P573, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
Amit R, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V31, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.001
Amran N.F., 2010, INT J BUSINESS SOCIA, V1, P193
Anderson RC, 2003, J FINANC, V58, P1301, DOI 10.1111/1540-6261.00567
 [Anonymous], 2019, XUEQIU NEWS
Baek JS, 2015, EMERG MARK FINANC TR, V51, P20, DOI 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1039899
Barker VL, 2002, MANAGE SCI, V48, P782, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.48.6.782.187
Baud C, 2012, SOCIO-ECON REV, V10, P241, DOI 10.1093/ser/mwr016
Bauer M., 1980, ORGAN STUD, V1, P298, DOI [10.1177/017084068000100316, DOI
10.1177/017084068000100316]
Bennedsen M., 2014, FAMILY BUSINESS MAP, P83, DOI DOI 10.1057/9781137382368_4
Bennedsen M, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P647, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
Bennedsen M, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V33, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.008
Bertrand M, 2008, J FINANC ECON, V88, P466, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.04.002
Bertrand M, 2006, J ECON PERSPECT, V20, P73, DOI 10.1257/jep.20.2.73
Burkart M, 2003, J FINANC, V58, P2167, DOI 10.1111/1540-6261.00601
Cabrera-Suarez K., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P37, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2001.00037.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00037.X]
Ramon-Llorens MC, 2017, INT BUS REV, V26, P786, DOI
10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.01.007
Cao J, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V33, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.005
Chrisman JJ, 2012, ACAD MANAGE J, V55, P976, DOI 10.5465/amj.2011.0211
Cucculelli M, 2008, J CORP FINANC, V14, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.11.001
Daily C. M., 1992, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V5, P117, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1992.00117.X
Daspit JJ, 2018, J BUS RES, V84, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.041
Davis JH, 1997, ACAD MANAGE REV, V22, P20, DOI 10.2307/259223
DEMSETZ H, 1985, J POLIT ECON, V93, P1155, DOI 10.1086/261354
Filatotchev I., 2005, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, V22, P257, DOI
10.1007/s10490-005-3569-2
Gatfield T., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P153
Gersick K. E., 1999, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V12, P287, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1999.00287.x
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2007, ADMIN SCI QUART, V52, P106, DOI 10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2009.00889.x
Graham JR, 2002, J FINANC, V57, P695, DOI 10.1111/1540-6261.00439
Hadlock CJ, 2010, REV FINANC STUD, V23, P1909, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhq009
HECKMAN JJ, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P153, DOI 10.2307/1912352
Hernandez-Trasobares, 2017, EUR RES MANAG BUS EC, V23, P46, DOI
10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.04.001
Hongjian W., 2016, CHINESE IND EC, P73
Hongjian W., 2017, DOES FINANCIALIZATIO, P155
Jiang FX, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V33, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.007
Jun S., 2015, J FINANCIAL STUDIES, P111
KEPNER E, 1983, ORGAN DYN, V12, P57, DOI 10.1016/0090-2616(83)90027-X
Kubota K, 2019, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.05.012
La Porta R, 1999, J FINANC, V54, P471, DOI 10.1111/0022-1082.00115
Lansberg I., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P119, DOI [10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00011-9, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x]
Larson H. H., 1992, EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES, V11, P18, DOI DOI 10.1108/eb010571
Lee J, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P103, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00060.x
Litz R.A., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P335, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2001.00335.X
Liu B, 2017, N AM J ECON FINANC, V40, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.najef.2017.01.005
Liu Y, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V30, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.004
MILLER D, 1991, MANAGE SCI, V37, P34, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.37.1.34
Miller D, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.x
Miller D, 2013, ORGAN SCI, V24, P189, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0728
Mullins W, 2016, J FINANC ECON, V119, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.08.011
Mwaura G., 1998, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,
V10, P212, DOI 10.1108/09596119810232211
Perez-Gonzalez F, 2006, AM ECON REV, V96, P1559, DOI 10.1257/aer.96.5.1559
 Quigley TJ, 2012, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V33, P834, DOI 10.1002/smj.1945
Rhoades S., 1993, FEDERAL RESERVE B, V79, P188
Rondi E, 2019, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001
Ross S.A., 2017, CORE PRINCIPLES APPL
Sacristan-Navarro M, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P71, DOI 10.1177/0894486510396705
Salvato C., 2004, J PRIVATE EQUITY, V7, P68, DOI DOI 10.3905/JPE.2004.412339
Sharma P., 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V25, P17, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870102500302
Sheikh S, 2018, RES INT BUS FINANC, V46, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.04.009
Shen N, 2017, J CORP FINANC, V45, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.04.012
Smith B., 1999, J CORP FINANC, V5, P341, DOI [10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00010-3, DOI
10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00010-3]
Sraer D, 2007, J EUR ECON ASSOC, V5, P709, DOI 10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.4.709
Sydow J., 2015, INT ENCY SOCIAL BEHA, P385
Tong C. K., 2014, CENTRIPETAL AUTHORIT, P21, DOI [10.1007/978-981-4451-85-7_2,
DOI 10.1007/978-981-4451-85-7_2]
Villalonga B, 2006, J FINANC ECON, V80, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
Weng TC, 2019, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V53, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.09.001
Westhead P, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P301, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00077.x
WONG SL, 1985, BRIT J SOCIOL, V36, P58, DOI 10.2307/590402
Xiaosheng J., 2013, J RENEW SUSTAIN ENER, P5
Xinhua Finance, 2013, FORB CHIN RICH LIST
Xu NH, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V33, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.004
Xu NH, 2013, EUR FINANC MANAG, V19, P675, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2011.00591.x
Xuyang H., 2017, CHINA IND EC, V2017, P154
Yang Z, 2014, SPRINGERBRIEF ECON, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-54044-8
Zellweger TM, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P851, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
Zhang YR, 2019, EMERG MARK FINANC TR, V55, P496, DOI
10.1080/1540496X.2018.1510770
Zhou J, 2015, EMERG MARK FINANC TR, V51, P432, DOI 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1024553
NR 78
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 10
U2 22
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1540-496X
EI 1558-0938
J9 EMERG MARK FINANC TR
JI Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade
PD NOV 13
PY 2020
VL 56
IS 14
BP 3294
EP 3319
DI 10.1080/1540496X.2019.1695592
EA NOV 2019
PG 26
WC Business; Economics; International Relations
SC Business & Economics; International Relations
GA NY2KC
UT WOS:000501084300001
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Porfirio, JA
Carrilho, T
Hassid, J
Rodrigues, R
AF Porfirio, Jose Antonio
Carrilho, Tiago
Hassid, Joseph
Rodrigues, Ricardo
TI Family Business Succession in Different National Contexts: A Fuzzy-Set
QCA Approach
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE family business; succession process; motivation for succession;
cross-country analysis; expectation states theory
ID FIRM PERFORMANCE; ANTECEDENTS; IMPACT; COMMITMENT
AB Family business succession is a key topic that has attracted considerable
attention from researchers, especially in the last decade. Most research, however,
is based on case studies with limited applicability and fails to present
comparisons across international contexts that highlight differences in succession
processes. We apply expectation states theory to analyze a sample of 128
observations in two Southern European countries, Portugal and Greece. We study
configurations of successors' characteristics, family business characteristics, the
existence (or absence) of a succession plan, and successors' motivation to succeed.
Our aim is to reveal how these issues affect successors' perceptions of preparation
for succession using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Family
businesses are a dominant organizational form all over the world, and succession
issues are critical for the sustainability of family businesses. Our findings
suggest that different configurations of conditions influence successors'
perceptions of preparation for family business succession. Moreover, we verify the
influence of cultural differences on these processes. This research helps fill a
gap in the literature, showing the role of a set of characteristics in successors'
perceptions of preparation for family business succession. Our conclusions provide
insight into the types of policies that can promote successful family business
succession.
C1 [Porfirio, Jose Antonio; Carrilho, Tiago] Univ Aberta, Social Sci & Management
Dept, CIEO Res Ctr Spatial & Org Dynam, P-1269001 Lisbon, Portugal.
[Hassid, Joseph] Univ Piraeus, Dept Econ, Piraeus 18534, Greece.
[Rodrigues, Ricardo] ISEG Lisbon Sch Econ & Management, Ctr Management Studies,
P-1249078 Lisbon, Portugal.
RP Porfirio, JA (corresponding author), Univ Aberta, Social Sci & Management Dept,
CIEO Res Ctr Spatial & Org Dynam, P-1269001 Lisbon, Portugal.
EM Jose.Porfirio@uab.pt; Tiago.Mendes@uab.pt; jhassid@unipi.gr;
cege@iseg.ulisboa.pt
RI Porfirio, Jose A/D-5527-2015; Rodrigues, Ricardo/H-9967-2016
OI Porfirio, Jose A/0000-0001-9551-9531; Rodrigues,
Ricardo/0000-0001-5661-2928
FU ERASMUS+ project [2016-3-EL02-KA205-002673]
FX The data for this study were collected as part of FABUSS
(www.fabuss-project.eu), an ERASMUS+ project (2016-3-EL02-KA205-002673)
aimed at evaluating the conditions for successful succession in European
family businesses.
CR Adjei EK, 2016, REG STUD REG SCI, V3, P303, DOI 10.1080/21681376.2016.1189354
Aldrich H.E., 1989, WOMEN OWNED BUSINESS, P13
Allouche J, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P315, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00132.x
Arregle JL, 2017, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V41, P801, DOI 10.1111/etap.12246
Astrachan J.H., 1994, FAM BUS REV, V7, P251, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1994.00251.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1994.00251.X]
ASTRACHAN J.H., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REVI, V15, P45, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00045.X
AUDET J, 2007, INT J ENTREPRENEURSH, V11, P27
Barach J.A., 1995, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V8, P131, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1995.00131.X
Barach J. A., 1988, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V26, P49
Barbera F, 2015, ACAD MANAG LEARN EDU, V14, P322, DOI 10.5465/amle.2014.0233
BERGER J, 1998, STATUS POWER LEGITIM
Berger Joseph, 1974, EXPECTATION STATES T
Berger Joseph, 1977, STATUS CHARACTERISTI
Blumentritt T, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00062.x
BORK D, 1986, FAMILY BUSINESS RISK
Brenes ER, 2017, IND MARKET MANAG, V62, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.12.001
Brockhaus R.H., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P165, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2004.00011.X
Byrne J, 2019, EUR MANAG REV, V16, P579, DOI 10.1111/emre.12298
Cabrera-Suarez K., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P37, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2001.00037.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00037.X]
Cater JJ, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P109, DOI 10.1177/0894486508327822
Cespedes FV, 2004, HARVARD BUS REV, V82, P31
Chrisman J. J., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V11, P19, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1998.00019.X]
Chrisman JJ, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P237, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00080.x
Chua J.H., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P89, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00089.X
Chung CN, 2013, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V34, P338, DOI 10.1002/smj.2011
Ciampa D, 1999, HARVARD BUS REV, V77, P160
Correll S.J., 2006, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL, P29, DOI DOI 10.1007/0-387-36921-X_2
Crilly D, 2012, ACAD MANAGE J, V55, P1429, DOI 10.5465/amj.2010.0697
Cuba R., 1983, AM J SMALL BUSINESS, V2, P40, DOI 10.1177/104225878300800208
Cucculelli M, 2008, J CORP FINANC, V14, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.11.001
DATTA DK, 1994, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V15, P569, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250150706
DeNoble A, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P127, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00091.x
Doescher W.F., 1993, SHAKE FAMILY TREE, P10
Botella-Carrubi MD, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11071873
Dumas C., 1989, THESIS
Dumas C., 1990, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V3, P169, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1990.00169.X
Eklund J, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V41, P419, DOI 10.1007/s11187-012-9432-1
Fenn D., 1994, ARE YOUR KIDS GOOD E, P36
Gagne M, 2014, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V23, P643, DOI 10.1080/1359432X.2014.906403
Ghee WY, 2015, ASIAN ACAD MANAG J, V20, P103
Gilding M, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P299, DOI 10.1111/etap.12040
Gottardo P., 2017, PROBL PERSPECT MANAG, V15, P168, DOI [10.21511/ppm.15(2-
1).2017.01, DOI 10.21511/PPM.15(2-1).2017.01]
HANDLER W. C., 1994, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V7, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00133.X
Harveston P.D., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P373
Hatak IR, 2015, FAM BUS REV, V28, P10, DOI 10.1177/0894486513480386
Helin J, 2016, INT SMALL BUS J, V34, P487, DOI 10.1177/0266242614567482
Howorth C., 2001, FAM BUS REV, V14, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00231.x, DOI
10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00231.X]
Hyatt J., 1992, FATHERS SONS, P51
Cabrera-Suarez MK, 2012, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V23, P2736, DOI
10.1080/09585192.2012.676458
Kaye K., 1999, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P15
KIMBERLY JR, 1981, ACAD MANAGE J, V24, P689, DOI 10.2307/256170
Kraus S, 2016, J INNOV KNOWL, V1, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.010
 Lansberg I., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P119, DOI [10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00011-9, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x]
Miralles-Marcelo JL, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P156, DOI
10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.03.002
Magazine T., 2014, THARAWAT MAG, V22
Mazzola P, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P239, DOI 10.1177/08944865080210030106
McCann JE, 2001, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V39, P50, DOI 10.1111/0447-2778.00005
Miller D, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P513, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
Miller D, 2013, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V34, P553, DOI 10.1002/smj.2024
Molly V, 2010, FAM BUS REV, V23, P131, DOI 10.1177/0894486510365062
Morris M., 1996, INT J ENTREPRENEURIA, V2, P68, DOI DOI
10.1108/13552559610153261
Murphy L, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.10.003
Nelson T, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1177/0894486517715390
Nelton S., 1986, LOVE BUSINESS ENTREP
Osborne R. L., 1991, MANAGE DECIS, V29, P42
Peng MW, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P253, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00890.x
Pyromalis Vassilios D., 2009, International Entrepreneurship and Management
Journal, V5, P439, DOI 10.1007/s11365-009-0118-3
Ragin C.C., 2008, REDESIGNING SOCIAL I
Ridgeway CL, 2011, FRAMED GENDER GENDER, DOI
[10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755776.001.0001, DOI
10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199755776.001.0001]
Roig-Tierno N, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P1261, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.089
Royer S, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00108.x
Salganicoff M., 1990, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V3, P125
Schneider C.Q, 2012, SET THEORETIC METHOD
Sharma P, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P667, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00015-6
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P., 2000, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V13, P313, DOI [10.1111/j.1741, DOI
10.1111/J.1741]
Sharma P., 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V25, P17, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870102500302
SHEPHERD DA, 2000, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V24, P25, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870002400402
Solon G, 2002, J ECON PERSPECT, V16, P59, DOI 10.1257/089533002760278712
Stamm Isabell, 2011, J FAMILY BUSINESS ST, V2, P117, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.JFBS.2011.07.002
Stavrou ET, 1999, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V37, P43
Vassiliadis S, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V9, P242, DOI 10.1016/S2212-
5671(14)00025-2
Venter E, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P283, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00049.x
Venturelli A, 2019, SOC RESPONSIB J, V15, P409, DOI 10.1108/SRJ-12-2017-0275
Vera CF, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00051.x
Ward J. L., 1987, KEEPING FAMILY BUSIN
Yoo SS, 2014, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V52, P246, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12098
NR 87
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 3
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD NOV
PY 2019
VL 11
IS 22
AR 6309
DI 10.3390/su11226309
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
Environmental Studies
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA JW8DR
UT WOS:000503277900122
OA DOAJ Gold, Green Published
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Kubicek, A
Machek, O
AF Kubicek, Ales
Machek, Ondrej
TI Gender-related factors in family business succession: a systematic
literature review
SO REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Review
DE Family business; Succession; Gender; Incumbent; Successor
ID CAREER CHOICE INTENTIONS; DAUGHTER SUCCESSION; FIRM SUCCESSION;
FATHER-DAUGHTER; CREDIT EVIDENCE; WOMEN; LEADERSHIP; MANAGEMENT;
ENTREPRENEURSHIP; MODEL
AB Succession is one of the most discussed topics in family business research.
However, despite the changing professional and family roles of women and the
growing number of female CEOs worldwide, published works in the body of literature
have relatively little to say on the role of gender in succession. The article
reviews the recent development in the literature related to women in
intergenerational succession in family businesses with the aim of systematizing
gender-related factors affecting intra-family succession, and also proposes
directions for future research. Based on a sample of 35 studies published between
2005 and 2017, this paper categorizes the gender-related factors found in the
literature into three categories: environment and context, people, and processes.
Subsequently, the paper summarizes the current state-of-the-art in light of these
three categories. Since the research on the role of gender in succession is
fragmented and lacks an overall direction, we present multiple directions for
future research. The present review contributes to the body of literature on the
development of family business by comprehensively systematizing existing gender-
related factors affecting succession.
C1 [Kubicek, Ales; Machek, Ondrej] Univ Econ, Fac Business Adm, Dept Strategy, W
Churchill Sq 4, Prague 13067 3, Czech Republic.
RP Machek, O (corresponding author), Univ Econ, Fac Business Adm, Dept Strategy, W
Churchill Sq 4, Prague 13067 3, Czech Republic.
EM ondrej.machek@vse.cz
RI Machek, Ondrej/L-4203-2018
OI Machek, Ondrej/0000-0003-3955-7853; Kubicek, Ales/0000-0001-7465-3125
FU Czech Science FoundationGrant Agency of the Czech Republic [GA17-10948S]
FX We appreciate the funding support received from the Czech Science
Foundation for this project entitled "Privately-held Firms with Multiple
Owners: The Role of Family and Responsible Ownership" (Registration No.:
GA17-10948S). We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for
their inspiring comments that allowed us to improve the quality of the
paper.
CR Ahl H, 2006, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V30, P595, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2006.00138.x
Ahl H, 2012, ORGANIZATION, V19, P543, DOI 10.1177/1350508412448695
Ahrens JP, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.02.002
Alesina AF, 2013, J EUR ECON ASSOC, V11, P45, DOI 10.1111/j.1542-
4774.2012.01100.x
Allen I., 2003, WOMEN FAMILY OWNED B
Alvesson M., 2009, UNDERSTANDING GENDER, V2nd ed.
Ansari IF, 2014, J CORP FINANC, V28, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.006
Aronoff CE, 1996, FAMILY BUSINESS SUCC
Arosa B., 2010, J FAMILY BUSINESS ST, V1, P88
Avloniti A, 2014, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V10, P661, DOI 10.1007/s11365-013-0271-6
Barnes L. B., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P9, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1988.00009.X
Barrett M, 2009, J MANAGE ORGAN, V15, P363, DOI 10.1017/S1833367200002674
Basco R, 2013, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V4, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.12.003
Benavides-Velasco CA, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V40, P41, DOI 10.1007/s11187-011-
9362-3
Bennedsen M, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P647, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
Borghans L, 2009, J EUR ECON ASSOC, V7, P649, DOI 10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.649
Boyd J., 1999, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V12, P299, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1999.00299.X
Brockhaus R.H., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P165, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2004.00011.X
Brush C.G., 1992, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V16, P5, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879201600401
Cabrera-Suarez K, 2005, LEADERSHIP QUART, V16, P71, DOI
10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.010
Cadieux L., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P17, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00017.X
Campopiano G, 2017, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V8, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.09.001
Cao J, 2015, J CORP FINANC, V33, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.005
Carney M, 2015, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V39, P513, DOI 10.1111/etap.12054
Cater JJ, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P109, DOI 10.1177/0894486508327822
Cavalluzzo KS, 2002, J BUS, V75, P641, DOI 10.1086/341638
Cavalluzzo KS, 1998, J MONEY CREDIT BANK, V30, P771, DOI 10.2307/2601128
Chrisman J. J., 2002, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V26, P113, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870202600407
Chrisman J. J., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V11, P19, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00019.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1998.00019.X]
Chrisman JJ, 2010, FAM BUS REV, V23, P9, DOI 10.1177/0894486509357920
Cicellin Mariavittoria, 2015, International Journal of Business Governance and
Ethics, V10, P97, DOI 10.1504/IJBGE.2015.068693
COLE PM, 2000, FAMILY J COUNSELLING, V8, P351, DOI DOI 10.1177/1066480700084004
Constantinidis C., 2009, INT MANAG, V14, P43
Curimbaba F., 2002, FAM BUS REV, V15, P239
Daspit JJ, 2016, FAM BUS REV, V29, P44, DOI 10.1177/0894486515599688
Davies HTO, 1998, HOSP MED, V59, P955
Davis J. A., 1989, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V2, P47, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1989.00047.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1989.00047.X]
Davis P. S., 1998, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V22, P31, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879802200302
Dawson A, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P339, DOI 10.1177/0894486511421487
De massis a, 2012, FAMILY BUSINESS STUD
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
de Pontet SB, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P337
Deng X, 2015, J FAM BUS MANAG, V5, P38, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-05-2014-0011
DeNoble A, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P127, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00091.x
 Dietrich J, 2009, J VOCAT BEHAV, V75, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.03.005
Dugan A.M., 2011, WOMANS PLACE CRUCIAL
Dumas C., 1992, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V16, P41, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879201600403
Dyck B, 2002, J BUS VENTURING, V17, P143, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00056-2
Eagly AH, 2003, PSYCHOL BULL, V129, P569, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
Eckel C.C., 2008, HDB EXPT EC RESULTS, V1, P1061, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1574-
0722(07)00113-8
Eddleston KA, 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V37, P1177, DOI 10.1111/etap.12002
Frishkoff P. A., 1996, FAMILY BUSINESS SOUR, P446
Gagne M, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P292, DOI 10.1177/0894486511410688
Garcia-Alvarez E., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P189, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00189.X
Gardiner M, 1999, J OCCUP ORGAN PSYCH, V72, P301, DOI 10.1348/096317999166699
Gatzke Jennifer, 2013, Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document,
V13, P1
Gherardi S, 2016, INT J GEND ENTREP, V8, P28, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-11-2014-0044
Gillis-Donovan J., 1990, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V3, P153, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1990.00153.X
Glover JL, 2014, INT J GEND ENTREP, V6, P276, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-01-2012-0006
Grant TD, 2015, AGGRESSION AGAINST UKRAINE: TERRITORY, RESPONSIBILITY, AND
INTERNATIONAL LAW, P15
Haberman H, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P163, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00088.x
Halkias D, 2010, INT J ENTREP VENTUR, V2, P320, DOI 10.1504/IJEV.2010.037116
Hamilton E, 2006, INT SMALL BUS J, V24, P253, DOI 10.1177/0266242606063432
Hamilton E, 2013, ENTREP REGION DEV, V25, P90, DOI 10.1080/08985626.2012.746879
HANDLER W. C., 1994, J FAMILY BUSINESS RE, V7, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1994.00133.X
Harveston P.D., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P373
Heck RKZ, 2008, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V46, P317, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2008.00246.x
Henry C, 2016, INT SMALL BUS J, V34, P217, DOI 10.1177/0266242614549779
Hollander B.S., 1990, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V3, P139, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1990.00139.X
Humphreys MMC, 2013, J FAM BUS MANAG, V3, P24, DOI 10.1108/20436231311326472
Hytti U, 2017, INT SMALL BUS J, V35, P665, DOI 10.1177/0266242616675924
Jennings JE, 2013, ACAD MANAG ANN, V7, P663, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2013.782190
Jones MV, 2011, J BUS VENTURING, V26, P632, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.04.001
Kaslow F. W., 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V11, P229, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1998.00229.x
Cabrera-Suarez MK, 2012, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V23, P2736, DOI
10.1080/09585192.2012.676458
Kaye K., 1992, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V5, P237, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1992.00237.x
Keating N. C., 1997, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V10, P157, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.1997.00157.X
Koffi V., 2014, ENTREPRENEURIAL EXEC, V19, P111
Kuratko D., 1993, J SMALL BUSINESS MAN, V31, P132
Lansberg I., 1988, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V1, P119, DOI [10.1016/S0883-
9026(03)00011-9, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x]
Lansberg I., 1994, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V7, P39, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1994.00039.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1994.00039.X]
Laspita S, 2012, J BUS VENTURING, V27, P414, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.006
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Lee KS, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P657
Litz RA, 2012, FAM BUS REV, V25, P16, DOI 10.1177/0894486511418489
Longenecker J. G., 1978, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V16, P1, DOI
10.4135/9781446247556.n13
Lumpkin GT, 2011, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V35, P1149, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2011.00495.x
Marlow S, 2009, INT SMALL BUS J, V27, P139, DOI 10.1177/0266242608100487
Marshall JP, 2006, J BUS VENTURING, V21, P348, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.004
Jimenez RM, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P53, DOI 10.1177/0894486508328813
Mascia DV, 2017, J FINANC STABIL, V31, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.jfs.2017.07.002
Mathew Viju, 2016, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business,
V27, P410
Matzek AE, 2010, FAM RELAT, V59, P60, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00586.x
Mazzi C., 2011, J FAMILY BUSINESS ST, V2, P166, DOI [DOI
10.1016/J.JFBS.2011.07.001, 10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.07.001]
Meier O, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.05.001
Mischel L, 2011, AM J EC BUS ADM, V3, P265
Moro A, 2017, J BANK FINANC, V80, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.04.009
Morris MH, 1997, J BUS VENTURING, V12, P385, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00010-4
Mussolino D, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.09.003
Nason RS, 2012, FATHER DAUGHTER SUCC
Nelson T, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1177/0894486517715390
Niederle M, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P1067, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067
Nordqvist M, 2013, SMALL BUS ECON, V40, P1087, DOI 10.1007/s11187-012-9466-4
Otten-Pappas D, 2013, J FAM BUS MANAG, V3, P8, DOI 10.1108/20436231311326463
Overbeke KK, 2015, FRONT PSYCHOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00625
Overbeke KK, 2013, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V4, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.07.002
Plumeyer A, 2019, REV MANAG SCI, V13, P227, DOI 10.1007/s11846-017-0251-2
POZA E.J., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REVI, V14, P25, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2001.00025.X
Reay T, 2014, FAM BUS REV, V27, P95, DOI 10.1177/0894486514529209
Remery C, 2014, J FAM BUS MANAG, V4, P79, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-09-2013-0021
Royer S, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00108.x
Sageder M, 2018, REV MANAG SCI, V12, P335, DOI 10.1007/s11846-016-0216-x
Salvato C, 2013, FAM BUS REV, V26, P235, DOI 10.1177/0894486513490796
Schlepphorst S, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P358, DOI
10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.08.004
Schmitt DP, 2008, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V94, P168, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168
Scholes ML, 2007, SMALL BUS ECON, V29, P329, DOI 10.1007/s11187-006-9024-z
Schroder E, 2013, J VOCAT BEHAV, V83, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.07.006
Schroder E, 2011, FAM BUS REV, V24, P305, DOI 10.1177/0894486511416977
Sharma P, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P667, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00015-6
Sharma P, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00067.x
Sharma P., 2000, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V13, P313, DOI [10.1111/j.1741, DOI
10.1111/J.1741]
Sharma P., 2003, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V16, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2003.00001.X
Sharma P., 2004, FAM BUS REV, V17, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2004.00001.X
Smith R, 2014, INT J GEND ENTREP, V6, P255, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-06-2011-0061
Smythe J, 2013, SMALL ENTERP RES, V20, P98, DOI 10.5172/ser.2013.20.2.98
Solomon A, 2011, FAM PROCESS, V50, P149, DOI 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01352.x
Sonfield MC, 2012, J FAM BUS MANAG, V2, P110, DOI 10.1108/20436231211261862
Sonfield MC, 2009, INT J GEND ENTREP, V1, P96, DOI 10.1108/17566260910969661
Sonnenfeld J., 1991, HEROS FAREWELL WHAT
Spence JT, 2000, PSYCHOL WOMEN QUART, V24, P44, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-
6402.2000.tb01021.x
Stafford K., 1999, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V12, P197, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1999.00197.x
Stavrou ET, 1999, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V37, P43
Suess J, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.02.001
Tatoglu E, 2008, INT SMALL BUS J, V26, P155, DOI 10.1177/0266242607086572
Tranfield D, 2003, BRIT J MANAGE, V14, P207, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
 Uhlaner L, 2007, SMALL BUS ECON, V29, P225, DOI 10.1007/s11187-006-9032-z
Venter E, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P283, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00049.x
Vera CF, 2005, FAM BUS REV, V18, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00051.x
Wang C, 2010, J FAM ECON ISS, V31, P475, DOI 10.1007/s10834-010-9230-3
Westhead P, 2003, INT SMALL BUS J, V21, P369, DOI 10.1177/02662426030214001
Williams DW, 2013, FAM RELAT, V62, P415, DOI 10.1111/fare.12016
Xi J, 2015, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V11, P113, DOI 10.1007/s11365-013-0286-z
Zellweger T, 2011, J BUS VENTURING, V26, P521, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.04.001
NR 143
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 5
U2 37
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 1863-6683
EI 1863-6691
J9 REV MANAG SCI
JI Rev. Manag. Sci.
PD NOV
PY 2019
VL 13
IS 5
BP 963
EP 1002
DI 10.1007/s11846-018-0278-z
PG 40
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA JJ3DA
UT WOS:000494040200003
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Mustafa, M
Elliott, C
Zhou, L
AF Mustafa, Michael
Elliott, Carole
Zhou, Li
TI Succession in Chinese family-SMEs: a gendered analysis of successor
learning and development
SO HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Family business; learning and development; HRD; gender; succession
ID SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; FIRMS; BUSINESS; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; GOVERNANCE;
LEGITIMACY; AGENDA; WOMEN; MODEL; SIZE
AB Due to characteristics such as size, financial constraints and entrepreneurial
origins, HRD and learning in SMEs is generally regarded as informal in nature. How
SME employees, including those in family SMEs, learn new knowledge and skills is
receiving increasing attention. This paper studies learning approaches in Chinese
family-SMEs during the succession process. We suggest that founder/owners' and
family-members' perceptions of gender influence the nature of successors' learning
and firm leadership opportunities by identifying the masculinization/feminization
of different learning modes. We argue that many SMEs' informal nature and owner
characteristics may exacerbate negative gendered stereotypes and norms, ultimately
affecting women's leadership learning and legitimacy. The study identifies
disruptions to the traditional gendered order as it emerges from women successors'
role and learning in SMEs. This offers a new lens to understand why some family-
SMEs might succeed and/or fail in the second generation.
C1 [Mustafa, Michael] Univ Nottingham, Malaysia Campus, London, England.
[Elliott, Carole] Univ Roehampton, London, England.
[Zhou, Li] Univ Loughborough, London, England.
RP Mustafa, M (corresponding author), Univ Nottingham, Malaysia Campus, London,
England.
EM michael.mustafa@nottingham.edu.my
OI mustafa, michael/0000-0003-3804-2532; Elliott,
Carole/0000-0003-3838-4452
CR Aguinis H, 2009, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V60, P451, DOI
10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163505
Ahlgren L, 2011, J WORKPLACE LEARN, V23, P331, DOI 10.1108/13665621111141920
Ahrens JP, 2015, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V6, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.02.002
Anderson V, 2017, HUM RESOUR DEV Q, V28, P125, DOI 10.1002/hrdq.21282
Aragon-Sanchez A, 2003, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V14, P956, DOI
10.1080/0958519032000106164
Arthur J. B., 2007, Human Resources Management Review, V17, P77, DOI
10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.02.001
Astrachan J.H., 1994, FAM BUS REV, V7, P251, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.1994.00251.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1994.00251.X]
Au K, 2013, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V30, P749, DOI 10.1007/s10490-012-9331-7
AUN KT, 1993, J SMALL BUSINESS ENT, V10, P15, DOI DOI
10.1080/08276331.1993.10600425
Barrett M., 2009, WOMEN FAMILY BUSINES
Barrett M, 2014, INT J GEND ENTREP, V6, P231, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-09-2012-0037
Berger PL, 1991, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
Bierema L. L., 2001, NEW DIRECTIONS FOR A, V92, P53, DOI DOI 10.1002/ACE.40
Braches B, 2017, INT SMALL BUS J-RES, V35, P535, DOI 10.1177/0266242616651921
Brockhaus R.H., 2004, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V17, P165, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2004.00011.X
Cabrera-Suarez K., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P37, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-
6248.2001.00037.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00037.X]
Calas MB, 2009, ACAD MANAGE REV, V34, P552, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2009.40633597
Carney M, 2005, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V29, P249, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2005.00081.x
Chirico F, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P169, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00117.x
Choi W, 2011, HUM RESOUR DEV Q, V22, P239, DOI 10.1002/hrdq.20078
Chua J. H. J. J., 1999, ENTREPRENEURSHIP THE, V23, P19, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879902300402
Constantinidis C., 2009, INT MANAG, V14, P43
Dahl GB, 2008, REV ECON STUD, V75, P1085, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00514.x
de Kok JMP, 2006, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V44, P441, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
627X.2006.00181.x
De Massis A, 2008, FAM BUS REV, V21, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
Deng X, 2015, J FAM BUS MANAG, V5, P38, DOI 10.1108/JFBM-05-2014-0011
Distelberg BJ, 2015, FAM BUS REV, V28, P193, DOI 10.1177/0894486513511327
Dou JS, 2013, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V30, P893, DOI 10.1007/s10490-012-9287-7
Dumas C., 1992, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V16, P41, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225879201600403
Ekanem I, 2007, INT SMALL BUS J, V25, P107, DOI 10.1177/0266242607074515
Ellinger AD, 2005, HUM RESOUR DEV Q, V16, P389, DOI DOI 10.1002/HRDQ.1145
Ellinger AD, 2007, J WORKPLACE LEARN, V19, P435, DOI 10.1108/13665620710819384
Ely R, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P1121
Garcia-Alvarez E., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V14, P209
Garcia-Alvarez E., 2002, FAMILY BUSINESS REV, V15, P189, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2002.00189.X
Geldenhuys DJ, 2012, SA J IND PSYCHOL, V38, DOI 10.4102/sajip.v38i2.1028
Gomez-Mejia LR, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2009.00889.x
Haberman H, 2007, FAM BUS REV, V20, P163, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00088.x
Huang PCC, 2011, MOD CHINA, V37, P3, DOI 10.1177/0097700410386434
Hytti U, 2017, INT SMALL BUS J, V35, P665, DOI 10.1177/0266242616675924
Josefy M, 2015, ACAD MANAG ANN, V9, P715, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2015.1027086
Kark R, 2010, HANDBOOK OF GENDER RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 2, P443, DOI
10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_19
Kets de Vries M.F.R., 1996, FAMILY BUSINESS HUMA
Kitching J., 2007, Human Resource Management Journal, V17, P42, DOI
10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00019.x
KOTEY B., 2004, J BUSINESS ENTERPRIS, V11, P474, DOI DOI
10.1108/14626000410567125
Kotey B, 2007, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V45, P214
Kumra S, 2008, BRIT J MANAGE, V19, pS65, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00572.x
Lave J, 1993, UNDERSTANDING PRACTI
Le Breton-Miller I, 2004, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V28, P305
Li XC, 2015, MANAGE ORGAN REV, V11, P579, DOI 10.1017/mor.2015.60
Lubatkin MH, 2005, J ORGAN BEHAV, V26, P313, DOI 10.1002/job.307
Madsen S. R., 2008, BECOMING WOMAN LEADE, V124
Man Thomas Wing Yan, 2016, International Journal of Management Practice, V9,
P412
Marlow S, 2010, BRIT J MANAGE, V21, P954, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00635.x
Jimenez RM, 2009, FAM BUS REV, V22, P53, DOI 10.1177/0894486508328813
Matlay H, 2002, ED TRAINING, V44, P357, DOI DOI 10.1108/00400910210449196
Matlay H, 2005, EDUC TRAIN, V47, DOI 10.1108/et.2005.00447hae.001
Miller D, 2003, J BUS VENTURING, V18, P513, DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
Mustafa MJ, 2018, HUM RESOUR DEV INT, V21, P163, DOI
10.1080/13678868.2017.1410005
Nelson T, 2017, FAM BUS REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1177/0894486517715390
NICOLINI D, 1995, HUM RELAT, V48, P727, DOI 10.1177/001872679504800701
Noe RA, 2014, ANNU REV ORGAN PSYCH, V1, P245, DOI 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-
031413-091321
Nolan CT, 2016, INT J MANAG REV, V18, P85, DOI 10.1111/ijmr.12062
Overbeke KK, 2013, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V4, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.07.002
POZA E.J., 2001, FAMILY BUSINESS REVI, V14, P25, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-
6248.2001.00025.X
Ramadani V, 2017, INT J GEND ENTREP, V9, P229, DOI 10.1108/IJGE-02-2017-0012
Ridgeway CL, 2001, J SOC ISSUES, V57, P637, DOI 10.1111/0022-4537.00233
Roulston Kathryn., 2010, REFLECTIVE INTERVIEW
Saru E., 2007, Journal of European Industrial Training, V31, P36, DOI
10.1108/03090590710721727
Saunders MNK, 2014, EUR J TRAIN DEV, V38, P136, DOI 10.1108/EJTD-07-2013-0073
Schulze WS, 2001, ORGAN SCI, V12, P99, DOI 10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
Sharma P., 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V25, P17, DOI DOI
10.1177/104225870102500302
Short HJ, 2018, HUM RESOUR DEV Q, V29, P7, DOI 10.1002/hrdq.21305
Smythe J, 2013, SMALL ENTERP RES, V20, P98, DOI 10.5172/ser.2013.20.2.98
Stead V, 2013, MANAGE LEARN, V44, P373, DOI 10.1177/1350507612449504
Stein D., 1998, SITUATED LEARNING AD
SUCHMAN MC, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P571, DOI 10.2307/258788
Tagiuri R., 1992, FAM BUS REV, V5, P43, DOI [10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9, DOI
10.1111/J.1741-6248.1992.00043.X, 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1992.00043.x]
Tannenbaum SI, 2011, SIOP ORGAN FRONT SER, P303
Tyler TR, 2006, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V57, P375, DOI
10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
Wang C, 2010, J FAM ECON ISS, V31, P475, DOI 10.1007/s10834-010-9230-3
 Wenger, 1991, SITUATED LEARNING LE
Wenger E., 2002, COMMUNITIES PRACTICE
Woodfield P, 2017, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V8, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.01.001
Yan J, 2006, FAM BUS REV, V19, P235, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00072.x
Zahra SA, 2012, SMALL BUS ECON, V38, P51, DOI 10.1007/s11187-010-9266-7
NR 86
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 2
U2 12
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1367-8868
EI 1469-8374
J9 HUM RESOUR DEV INT
JI Hum. Resour. Dev. Int.
PD OCT 20
PY 2019
VL 22
IS 5
SI SI
BP 504
EP 525
DI 10.1080/13678868.2019.1608123
PG 22
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA JD0RN
UT WOS:000489683800005
OA Green Accepted
DA 2021-03-01
ER

PT J
AU Mackie, R
AF Mackie, Robin
TI Succession and inheritance in Scottish business families, c.1875?1935
SO BUSINESS HISTORY
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Family firms; succession; inheritance; limited liability; Scotland;
ownership; control
ID WOMEN INVESTORS; INDUSTRIES; GENDER
AB This article explores the dynamics of succession and inheritance in Scottish
business families during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Making
use of the unusual quality of Scottish testamentary records, it explores the
management of succession within family firms, focussing on the relationship between
the choices made by business owners, their family circumstances, and the future of
their firms. Taking the ?family-centred? approach to business development used by
historians such as Morris, Owens and Barker for the period of the industrial
revolution in England as a starting point, it argues that a broader understanding
of inheritance can explain business succession, and that the control and ownership
of family firms was changed by the uses made of limited liability.
C1 [Mackie, Robin] Open Univ, Dept Hist, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England.
RP Mackie, R (corresponding author), Open Univ, Dept Hist, Milton Keynes, Bucks,
England.
EM robin.mackie@open.ac.uk
CR Acheson GG, 2015, ECON HIST REV, V68, P911, DOI 10.1111/ehr.12086
 Anderson M., 1990, PEOPLE SOC SCOTLAND, P8
Antonio D. G., 1968, SCOTS LAW ADM COMMER
Barker H., 2016, FAMILY BUSINESS IND
Barker H, 2012, BUS HIST, V54, P227, DOI 10.1080/00076791.2011.631117
BERGHOFF H, 1991, BUS HIST, V33, P222, DOI 10.1080/00076799100000054
BRITTON R, 1985, B I HIST RES, V58, P78
Cheffins B., 2008, CORPORATE OWNERSHIP
COLLI A., 2003, HIST FAMILY BUSINESS
Colli A., 2003, ENTERP SOC, V4, P28, DOI DOI 10.1093/es/4.1.28
DAVIDOFF L, 1992, FAMILY FORTUNES MEN
Davis L.E., 1986, MAMMON PURSUIT EMPIR
Erskine J., 1895, PRINCIPLES LAW SCOTL
FINCH J, 1996, WILLS INHERITANCE FA
Foreman-Peck J, 2012, ECON HIST REV, V65, P1217, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
0289.2011.00637.x
Gordon E., 2003, PUBLIC LIVES WOMEN F
Gordon E., 2006, GENDER SCOTTISH HIST, P235
Green A, 2009, MARX EDUC, P133
GREEN DW, 2011, PERSPECTIVES GENDER, P53
Honeyman K, 2007, BUS HIST REV, V81, P471, DOI 10.1017/S0007680500036680
Howorth C., 2006, OXFORD HDB ENTREPREN, P225
James H., 2006, FAMILY CAPITALISM WE
JEREMY DJ, 1991, BUS HIST, V33, P93, DOI 10.1080/00076799100000006
Johnson Paul, 2010, MAKING MARKET VICTOR
Ketelbey C. D. M., 1967, HIST R TULLIS CO TUL
Lansberg I., 1999, SUCCEEDING GENERATIO
Lockhart J. Y., 1939, KIRKCALDY 1838 1938
Mackie R, 2001, BUS HIST, V43, P1, DOI 10.1080/713999227
Mackie R., 2008, HIST PERSPECTIVES CO, P157
Maltby J, 2006, BUS HIST, V48, P220, DOI 10.1080/00076790600576818
McCrum A., 2000, URBAN FORTUNES PROPE, P149
Morgan N., 1990, PEOPLE SOC SCOTLAND, P103
Morris R. J., 2005, MEN WOMEN PROPERTY E
Morris R. J., 1998, STUDIES REGIONAL CUL, P113
Morris R.J., 1979, SEARCH WEALTH STABIL, P91
Muir A., 1956, NAIRNS KIRKCALDY SHO
Nation ISP, 2009, ESL APPL LING PROF, P115
NENADIC S, 1991, ECON HIST REV, V44, P66
Oakley C. A., 1937, SCOTTISH IND TO DAY
Owens A, 2002, BUS HIST, V44, P21, DOI 10.1080/713999259
Owens A, 2001, SOC HIST, V26, P299, DOI 10.1080/03071020110070882
Payne P.L., 1984, FAMILY BUSINESS ERA, P171
Popp A, 2012, STUD BUS HIST, P1
Rose Mary B., 1994, BUSINESS ENTERPRISE, p[61, 66, 76]
ROSE MB, 1993, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, NETWORKS AND MODERN BUSINESS, P127
Rubinstein W. D., 1981, MEN PROPERTY VERY WE
Rutterford J, 2006, FEM ECON, V12, P111, DOI 10.1080/13545700500508288
Schmitz C, 1997, BUS HIST, V39, P42, DOI 10.1080/00076799700000050
Scranton P, 1983, PROPRIETARY CAPITALI
Smith A., 1952, COUNTY FIFE 3 STAT A
NR 50
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 14
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0007-6791
EI 1743-7938
J9 BUS HIST
JI Bus. Hist.
DI 10.1080/00076791.2019.1676236
EA OCT 2019
PG 20
WC Business; History Of Social Sciences
SC Business & Economics; Social Sciences - Other Topics
GA JE1LV
UT WOS:000490455800001
DA 2021-03-01
ER