Activity Final - Mayra Giraldo
Activity Final - Mayra Giraldo
Manufacture 35 37 38
Subcontract 33 35 36
Buy 38 40 41
Lease 40 42 43
Probabilities Ʃ = 1 0.23 0.21 0.25
Preguntas
a. Use EVPI to determine if the company should try to get a better estimate of the
favorable unfavorable
P(F/low) = 0,3 P(D/low) = 0,7
P(F/low average) = 0,36 P(D/ low average) = 0,64
P(F/high medium) = 0,28 P(D/ high medium) = 0,72
P(F/high) = 0,5 P(D/high) = 0,5
SOLUTION
Low (0.23)
Low average (0.21)
Manufacture
Node 2
High medium(0.25)
High (0.31)
Low (0.23)
High (0.31)
Node 1
Low (0.23)
High (0.31)
Low (0.23)
High (0.31)
Node 2 37.72
Node 3 35.72
Node 4 40.72
Node 5 42.41
The decision recommended by the method of the expected value is subcontract with a payment of 42,41 million
If we remember,
EVPI = 42.41
EVPI = 0
favorable
P(F/low) = 0,3
P(F/low average) = 0,36
P(F/high medium) = 0,28
P(F/high) = 0,5
favorable
P(F/low) = 0,3
P(F/low average) = 0,36
P(F/high medium) = 0,28
P(F/high) = 0,5
Favorable
Previous probabilities
State of nature Conditional
P(sj)
probabilities P(D/sj)
Low 0.23 0.3
Low average 0.21 0.36
High medium 0.25 0.28
High 0.31 0.5
𝑃(𝑠_1 )= 0,23 𝑃(𝑠_2 )= 0,21 𝑃(𝑠_3 )= 0,25 𝑃(𝑠_4 )= 0,31 P(F)
unfavorable
P(D/low) = 0,7
P(D/ low average) = 0,64
P(D/ high medium) = 0,72
P(D/high) = 0,5
Unfavorable
Previous probabilities
State of nature P(sj) Conditional
probabilities P(D/sj)
PROBABILITIES DECISION
Manufacture
FAVORABLE 0.37
Node 2
Subcontract
Buy
Lease
=(42,65∗0
Node 1
Manufacture
Subcontract
UNFAVORABLE 0.63 Buy
Node 3
Lease
EVwMI = 42.68
EVwoMI = 42.41
EVMI =
𝐸=𝐸𝑉𝑀𝐼/𝐸𝑉𝑃𝐼 𝑋100" " 0.27
EVPI = 0
R//: El valor esperado de la información perfecta (EVPI) es de 0 millones donde, el valor esperado sin info
igual al valor esperado con información perfecta por lo cual la estimación de la demanda en nula (0)
b. A test market study of potential product demand is expected to report a favorable (F) or unfavorable (U
relevant conditional probabilities are:
According to the corresponding information in Table 1 and the Predicted Value of Perfect Information (EV
Value of Sample Information (EVMI) and Decision Trees, respond:
a. Use EVPI to determine if the company should try to get a better estimate of the demand.
R//: El valor esperado de la información perfecta (EVPI) es de 0 millones donde, el valor esperado sin info
igual al valor esperado con información perfecta por lo cual la estimación de la demanda en nula (0)
b. A test market study of potential product demand is expected to report a favorable (F) or unfavorable (U
relevant conditional probabilities are:
R//: El estudio de Mercado de prueba de la demanda potencial de producto reporta una des favorabilida
posterior de 0,63
nature
40
38
43
44
0.31
o report a favorable (F) or unfavorable (U) condition. The relevant conditional probabilities are:
unfavorable
= 0,7
verage) = 0,64
medium) = 0,72
= 0,5
DEMAND
35 8.05
37 7.77
37.72
38 9.5
40 12.4
33 7.59
35 7.35
35.72
36 9
38 11.78
38 8.74
40 8.4
40.72
41 10.25
43 13.33
40 9.2
42 8.82
42.41
43 10.75
44 13.64
ayment of 42,41 million
million
unfavorable
P(D/low) = 0,7
P(D/ low average) = 0,64
P(D/ high medium) = 0,72
P(D/high) = 0,5
able
rable
0.161 0.26
0.1344 0.21
0.18 0.29
0.155 0.25
0.6304
PROBABILITY DEMAND
Low (0.19) 35
High (0.42) 40
Low (0.19) 33
Low (0.19) 38
High (0.42) 43
Low (0.19) 40
High (0.42) 44
Low (0.26) 35
High (0.25) 40
Low (0.23) 33
High (0.24) 38
Low (0.23) 38
High (0.24) 43
Low (0.23) 40
High (0.24) 44
demand.
demand.
valor esperado sin información perfecta es
manda en nula (0)
e (F) or unfavorable (U) condition. The
42.675216
42.69
SITUACION DE INCERTIDUMBRE
PROBLEMA 2
The company is thinking of acquiring machinery with new technology to carry out its workshop w
The purchase will be decided according to several alternatives presented by the seller (adaptabil
to facilitate the implementation in the workshop. The decision variables presented below represe
cost of adaptation that will arise after acquiring the machinery and training the workers in their
Table 11 shows the costs in millions of currency units per technology.
Criteria
LAPLACE
Therefore, the lowest level of supply is associated with the lowest expected cost (806) specified technology 4.
Wald or pessimistic
Hurwicz
coefficient optimist a 0.7
coefficient pesSimistic (1 - a): 0.3
Nivel de
Does not Fits Fits
Alternative Fits well seguridad
fit acceptably successfully Max {Xy}
Technology 1 780 810 818 860 860
Technology 2 880 820 855 820 880
Technology 3 830 875 878 900 900
Technology 4 630 872 812 910 910
Nivel de
Does not Fits Fits
Alternative Fits well seguridad
fit acceptably successfully Max {Xy}
Technology 1 780 810 818 860 860
Technology 2 880 820 855 820 880
Technology 3 830 875 878 900 900
Technology 4 630 872 812 910 910
When dealing with costs, the alternative associated with the lowest weighted average is selected. The opti
Savage
Matrix of benefits
Determine the optimal size of the premises to be purchased, using the methods of
LAPLACE, WALD, HURWICZ AND SAVAGE. Hurwicz Alpha 0,70.
R//: According to the criteria of costs of the place the optimal decision level is
technology 4, with $ 806 dollars. with criterion the Wald or pessimistic, the optimal
decision level is technology 1,. with $ 860,00 dollars. with criteria the Hurwicz, the
optimal decision level is technology 4, with $ 826,00 dollars and with criteria the
Savage (Cost matrix), the optimal decision level is technology 4, with $ 90 dollars.
arry out its workshop work.
by the seller (adaptability), this
resented below represent the
g the workers in their use.
lower cost
fied technology 4.
MINI MAX
Nivel
optimista Media
Min {Xy} ponderada
780 836.00
820 862.00
830 879.00
630 826.00
Nivel
optimista Media
Min {Xy} ponderada
780 836.00
820 862.00
830 879.00
630 826.00
PLAYER B MAXIMIN
65 82 72 65 68 65
PLAYER A 78 89 56 89 81 56
92 86 83 64 72 64
89 88 76 67 75 67
67 59 89 65 79 59
MINIMAX 92 89 89 89 81 There is no established cha
STEPS SOLVER
Strategy maximin = minimax
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
0.114415 0 0.39495798 0.49062702 0
PLAYER B
P1 0 65 82 72 65 68
PLAYER A
P2 0.409825 78 89 56 89 81
P3 0.12799 92 86 83 64 72
P4 0 89 88 76 67 75
0.462185 67 59 89 65 79
Suma 1
Maximun 92 89 89 95 81
MaxZ = V 74.707822
The maximin and the minimax would already be the same and this would be the saddle point = 74,707822
R//: The maximin and the minimax would already be the same and this would be the saddle point = 74,70782
here is no established chair point
Suma
1
In order to determine the decision conditions in the market, the Game Theory will be
used, using the graphical solution of the type (2 x N) and (2 x M) to estimate the
strategy and value of the game for the following data:
Strategy A Strategy B
P1+P2=1 P1+P2=1
Strategy A Strategy B
Si P1 = 1 Ve = 5 Si P1 = 1 Ve = 6
Si P1 = 0 Ve = 4 Si P1= 0 Ve = 3
Vexpected = 3P1 +3
9_ Vexpected = 1P1 + 4
3P1 + 3 = 1P1 + 4
6_ A 3P1 - 1P1 = 4-3
2P1 = 1
P1 = 1/2
3_ B P1 = 0.5
P2 = 1 - P1 = 1 - 1/2
0_ P2 = 0.5
1
VALUE OF THE GAME
Vexpected = + 3 =
Vexpected = 4.5
This means that if both players determine the probabilities of the actions
of each of their strategies, both will have the possibility of 2,5. This
represents a balanced game.
Player 2
Strategy
A B
I 5 6
Player 1
II 4 3
Strategy 1 Strategy 2
Q1+Q2=1 Q1+Q2=1
Strategy 1 Strategy 2
Si Q1 = 1 Ve = 5 Si Q1 = 1 Ve = 4
Si Q1 = 0 Ve = 6 Si Q1= 0 Ve = 3
12_
Then A and B
9_
Vexpected = -1Q1 + 6
Vexpected = 1Q1 + 3
6_
1 -1Q1 + 6 = 1Q1 + 3
-1Q1+1Q1 3 - 6
3_ 2 0Q1 -3
Q1 = 0/-3
Q1 = 0
0_
1 Q2 = 1 - Q1 = 1 - 0/3
Q2 = 1
Vexpected =Q1 + 6
Vexpected = 6
This means that if both players determine the probabilities of the actions
of each of their strategies, both will have the possibility of 6.
But the graph does not show the representation of a balanced game.
According to Table 4 find the value of the game by means of the graphical method
applied to matrices 2 x n or m x 2.
R//:
For column the player: This means that if both players determine the probabilities of
the actions of each of their strategies, both will have the possibility of 2,5. This
represents a balanced game.
For the player row: This means that if both players determine the probabilities of the
actions of each of their strategies, both will have the possibility of 6.
But the graph does not show the representation of a balanced game.
Theory will be
stimate the
Como P1 + P2 =1 P2= 1 - P1
Replace P2
3P1 +3 Strategy B
1P1 + 4 Strategy A
1P1 + 4
1 - 1/2
E OF THE GAME
3 (1/2) + 3
Como Q1 + Q2 =1 Q2= 1 - Q1
-1Q1 + 6 Strategy 1
1Q1 + 3 Strategy 2
1Q1 + 3
1 - 0/3
E OF THE GAME
-1(0/3)+6
l method
obabilities of
5. This
bilities of the
Problem 5. Markov decision problem:
An insurance company charges its customers according to their accident history. If you have no
years are charged US $ 6000 (State 1); If you have had an accident in each of the last two yea
6300 (State 2). If you had accidents the first of the last two years US $ 5800 (State 3). The pro
according to historical data of three years are:
La matriz de transicion para una cadena de Markov de n estados es una matriz de nxn con todo
de los registros de cada fila (0 columna) es igual a 1.
E0
W
0.2308
W
-0.82
0.42
0.40
1
According to Table 5 by applying the Markovian processes, ie finding the tra
equations of p * q, where p is the transition matrix and q the vector [W X Y
a. What is the transition matrix resulting from proportionality according to
R//: (0,2308*6000+0,2359*6300+0,5333*5800)
b. What is the average premium paid by a customer in Payoff, according to
R//: La prima promedio que deben pagar los clientes es 5,964
history. If you have not had accidents the last two
each of the last two years you will be charged $
5800 (State 3). The probabilities of the state
1.00
1.00
1.00
∑ p*q=
1 EC 1 0,18X + 0,35Y + 0,20Z =X
1 q= ( X Y Z ) EC 2 0,42X + 0,25Y + 0,15Z =Y
1 EC 3 0,40X + 0,40Y + 0,65Z =Z
EC 4 X+Y+Z =1
matriz de nxn con todos los registros no negativos y con la propiedad adicional de que la suma
E1 E2
X Y
0.2359 0.5333 1.0000
X Y Independiente Igual a:
0.35 0.20 0 -1.3878E-17
-0.75 0.15 0 -5.5511E-17
0.4 -0.35 0 2.7756E-17
1 1 -1 0.0000E+00
$ 5,964
ocesses, ie finding the transition matrix and solving the respective
and q the vector [W X Y Z]. Answer:
portionality according to the accident history?
Suppose you get 6 types of Jeans brands in the Colombian market: Brand 1, Brand
Brand 4, Brand 5 and Brand 6. The following table shows the odds that you continu
same brand or change it.
At present, brand, have the following percentages in market share respectively (19
17%, 15%, 19% y 12%) during week 4.
R// According the data of problm 5 the probability that each user stays with the ma
period for is:
0.1782