Tan Delta Testing Webinar Advanced NV
Tan Delta Testing Webinar Advanced NV
P = 𝑉 𝑥 IR 𝑥 cos 𝜑
H
And that it creates
E
a vicious circle (a chain A
reaction) that T
can lead to dramatic Chain reaction resulting
failures in insulation breakdown
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
We also mentioned that TD and PF in most cases are the Current and voltage vectors
same (up to 10°) and if there is a significant difference, in insulation
then the insulation is probably very much compromised
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
15. …continuing
15. …continuing
9994.4 12.855 4.0975 0.228 0.228 342.738 1786.04 89.8692 437.937 782.392
1
𝛿 = 90° − ϕ 𝑇𝑎𝑛 𝛿 =
𝜔𝑅𝑝𝐶
𝛿 = 90° − 89.8692° = 0.1308 °
1
𝑇𝑎𝑛 0.1308° = 0.228 % = = 0.228 %
314 ∙342.738 ∙ 10 6 ∙ 4.0975 ∙ 10 −9
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
9994.4 12.855 4.0975 0.228 0.228 342.738 1786.04 89.8692 437.937 782.392
𝑇𝑎𝑛 𝛿 0.002283 1
𝑅𝑠= =
314 ∙ 4.0975 ∙ 10 −9
= 1775 𝑄𝐹 = = 438.02
𝜔𝐶 𝑇𝑎𝑛 𝛿
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
BTW you can have your 𝑇𝑎𝑛 𝛿 result in absolute or in percentages – (0.00228 vs. 0.228 %)
𝐼𝑅
Absolute because 𝑇𝑎𝑛 𝛿 = and it is a non dimensional number (Amps divided with Amps)
𝐼𝐶
And for small angles (and do not forget we talk about values less than 1 degree) 𝑇𝑎𝑛 𝛿 is a small number
So we simply multiply 𝑇𝑎𝑛 𝛿 in absolute with a 100 and from then on we express the value in percentages
mostly for practical reasons
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
This table is here only as a guideline what to expect in terms of Capacitance when measuring Tan Delta
Capacitance heavily depends on physical size of the asset – that us why bigger assets have bigger capacitance
Keep in mind - this is not written in stone – but it should serve as a guideline
Watch carefully -
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Substation KAZAN
Bay TRAFO
Results
Test sequence 1
Nominal capacitance 0,2000 nF
Nominal Tδ 5,0000 m%
Sweep None
Results
Vout [ V] I out [ A] Freq. [Hz] Cp [F] Tδ [% ] QF Loss [W] [W]@10kV QTest [VA] STest [VA] Rp [Ω]
1 9994,4 12,855m 50,0 4,0976n 0,2283 437,9366 0,2934 0,2938 -128,4669 128,4673 342,7383M
Test sequence 2
Nominal capacitance 0,2000 nF
Nominal Tδ 5,0000 m%
Sweep None
Results
Vout [ V] I out [ A] Freq. [Hz] Cp [F] Tδ [% ] QF Loss [W] [W]@10kV QTest [VA] STest [VA] Rp [Ω]
1 9994,7 10,079m 50,0 3,2127n 0,2518 397,2302 0,2538 0,2541 -100,7282 100,7285 396,7296M
Signature : Approval :
Good T𝛿 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
Good T𝛿 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Specimen Capacitance
Good T𝛿 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
CHL 3,2127 nF
CHT 3,1983 nF
Sum of capacitances
CH+CHL+CHT 10,5077 nF
Good T𝛿 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 measured
CH+CHL+CHT 10,5086 nF
summed up Δ = 1,1 𝑝𝐹
Substation ISTOCNAJA
Capacitance & Tanδ
Bay TRAFO 1
Results
Test sequence 1
Nominal capacitance 0,2000 nF
Nominal Tδ 5,0000 m%
Sweep None
Results
Vout [ V] I out [A] Freq. [Hz] Cp [F] Tδ [% ] QF Loss [W] [W]@10kV QTest [VA] STest [VA] Rp [Ω]
1 10,0k 24,600m 50,0 7,8316n 0,1828 547,0911 0,4504 0,4499 -246,1359 246,1363 224,1598M
Test sequence 2
Nominal capacitance 0,2000 nF
Nominal Tδ 5,0000 m%
Sweep None
Results
Vout [ V] I out [A] Freq. [Hz] Cp [F] Tδ [% ] QF Loss [W] [W]@10kV QTest [VA] STest [VA] Rp [Ω]
1 10,0k 25,610m 50,0 8,1546n 0,2185 457,7683 0,5600 0,5595 -256,1964 256,1970 180,0544M
Signature : Approval :
File name : SVEL TRAFO 1Serial Number : 435523 Print Date : 29.3.2020. 21:48:31
Page 1 of 2
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
CH Good T𝛿 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Specimen Capacitance
CHL 7,8316 𝑛𝐹
CH + CHL 15,9879
measured
CH + CHL 15,9862
Summed up
Δ = − 1,7 𝑝𝐹
Phase A
Bad T𝛿 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
Further investigation - Voltage and Frequency sweep
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Consistent Cp
proves that
measurement
is correct and stable
T𝛿 stays high
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Freq. Sweep
Bad T𝛿 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
Phase A
Consistent Cp
proves that
measurement
is correct and stable
T𝛿 is showing
that ominous sign
First big and then
small
Goes to prove
that this bushing
needs to be
replaced
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Freq. Sweep
Bad T𝛿 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
Phase B
Consistent Cp
proves that
measurement
is correct and stable
T𝛿 is again above
the allowed value
but not as high
as Ph A
Cp is like on
phase A
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Freq. Sweep
Bad T𝛿 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
Phase C
Consistent Cp
proves that
measurement
is correct and stable
T𝛿 is showing
even bigger values
than before
Cp has similar
values as for
Ph A and Ph B
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Freq. Sweep
Bad T𝛿 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
Phase N
Consistent Cp
proves that
measurement
is correct and stable
T𝛿 is showing the
biggest values
of all 4 bushigs
Cp has similar
values as for
Ph A, Ph B, Ph C
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
𝐼𝑅 𝑈ൗ
= 𝑅 = 1
𝐼𝐶 𝑈 𝑗𝜔𝑅𝐶 Moisture
൘1ൗ
𝑗𝜔𝐶
Oil conductivity
While Capacitance – being a phisical reality of a
specimen – should stay the same
Geometry
Moisture
The TD curve shifts to the right as water penetrates 1 mHz 10 mHz 100 mHz 1 Hz 10 Hz 100 Hz
Good T𝛿 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
CRS
CRS CST
CR CS CT
Insulation system
VTD
I_Load
U R
z
y V S
M
x W T
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
U R
z
y V S
M
x W T
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
46
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
47
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
48
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
49
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
50
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
NOTE:
The 2 short circuit connection (*) must be performed before starting the test
51
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
RESULTS
52
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
NOTE: the above “decrease” and “increase” are referred to the references
values (manufacturers, etc).
53
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
• Location: Europe
• After the installation of a HV transformer, the
utility started immediately to see a critical
level of equivalent gas (using 2 gas DGA unit)
• TECHIMP global monitoring system also
confirmed that Interface PDs (PD activities
between two different insulation materials)
were happening in every phases
• Utility is looking for the TECHIMP suggestion
corresponding the situation
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
•
•
•
C
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
qMAX95% = PD amplitude
Nw = PD repetition rate
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Hydrogen increase
confirmed due to the
three interface PD
activities inside the
Transformer!
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Capacitance
Tan-
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Result:
• Transformer PD Free!
• No further H2 increase
• Elimination of interfaces air/oil
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Specimen = Sample (by that inteding the sample of our insulation system). We could also
freely say „Capacitor“ instead of Specimen since we are measuring the speciments (parts of
overall insulating system) of Capacitors (insulation)
Examples of Speciments:
Ungrounded Specimen -
none of the sides touch the
ground
HV (H) LV (L)
CHL Equivalent Scheme
H L
R
r y
CH CL
b
B
Y
Grounded Specimens
- one side is touching
the ground
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Examples of Speciments:
UST
UST
CHL CLT
H T
R
r y r y L
1 1 2 2
b
b
1
2
B
Y
CH CL CT
That way we can more easiliy discern if the problem lies in (for 2 Winding transformer):
1. HV to GND insulation or
2. LV to GND insulation or
3. HV – LV insulation
4. Inside the Bushing (C1)
5. Between Bushing Tap and GND (C2)
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
One could say that the choice of method (UST, GST….) is kind of a switch that
is placed before the Ammeter/Wattmeter and that chooses which currents flows
Into the said Ammeter/Wattmeter:
And an example with transformer that has Primary, Secondary and Tertiary winding
SWITCH
Current coming from the Ground
Current coming to Input A
Here are the 7 combinations (X) marks what input is taken into consideration:
UST-A UST-B UST-A+B GST GSTg-A GSTg-B GSTg-A+B
Input A x x x x
Input B x x x x
Ground x x x x
By definition UST will never measure the current through the Ground
By definition GST will always measure the current through the Ground
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Measurement Input A
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing – Practical Example 1 – UST-A
This is determined autmatically by the test set depending on what you want to measure
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing – Practical Example 1 – UST-A
AC
CH CL
Ammeter
Cmeasured = CHL This is the current
(and thus also the capacitance)
Input A
Input B that we measure (CHL)
Measurement Input A
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
This is determined autmatically by the test set depending on what you want to measure
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
This is what would be happening inside the test set
CHL
H L
Cmeasured = CH This is the current that we do not
measure because we have „guard A”
In this case, since we are which means „do not measure A”
AC
measuring in GST mode,
by definition it means that CH
we are measuring the Ground current CL
This also is an answers
Ammeter to the question why we
Input GND can measure CH, CHL
but also CH + CHL without
changing connections
Input B
Connection Scheme
HV generation of test set connected to LV side of Trafo
Measurement Input A
This is determined autmatically by the test set depending on what you want to measure
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing – Practical Example – GSTg-A
This is what would be happening inside the test set
This is the current that we do not
measure because we have „guard A”
which means „do not measure A” CHL
Cmeasured = CL So actually by changing
the place where we
H L generate – from HV to LV
AC
side of Transformer, we
change from measuring
CH CH to measurement of CL
CL
Ammeter
Input GND Also CL cannot be measured
Input B if generation is on the HV winding
of Transformer.
Input A
Even thou it seems that current
on input A is measured, Current coming
Ammeter
because there is cable This is what happens internally Input GND To Input A is bypassed
connected to input A, internally from being measured
this current is not taken into by internal ammeter
Input B
consideration because of „guard A” Input A
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing – Custom mesurement
CH CL
No measurment on Input A or Input A
Input B is done since nothing is Input B
connected to it (and even if we
would connect something, it
woud not be measured)
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
For autmatic measurement on a transformer that has primary, secodary and terriary winding.
Also in some rare cases if Input A does not work properly (either not calibrated or is burned) – we can use Input B
CHT
AC
CHL CLT
H
L T
Input B Input A CH CL CT
GND
2. Tan Delta does not leave a lot of free electrons in the insulation (which DC test does) –
which can later trigger Partial Discharge activity so it is considered less destructive than DC tests
4. Giving us more similar conditions (AC) than PI (DC) test since we are using the said equipment with AC
voltage
1. PD are „micro sparks” that partially bridge the insulation – TD is more like overall statistical value of the
insulation’s conductivity
2. Tan Delta shows us the oveall state of the insulation while PD is showing us if we have some issues
happening right now – at this moment
3. Seeing if something is happening right now – we can corelate certain events with the behaviour of
insulation (switching or OLTC, overvoltages, near by faults…)
5. PD is better seen on bushings (that are very prone to deterioration) while TD sees well whole PT
Workshop on Tan Delta Testing
Negative Tan Delta
Even thou this topic itself deserves a small webinar itself we will try to simplify and list few main reason
why tan delta has negative sign.
First of all negative sign means that angle ϕ is bigger than 90 degrees