Lifetime Assessment of NH - Plants: Approach For Lifetime Extension
Lifetime Assessment of NH - Plants: Approach For Lifetime Extension
C. J. Dekker
Continental Engineering B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
T
o put it bluntly; Bucks, Quid (U.K.) or Poen
(Dutch). plant's lifetime far beyond the original designed life-
time, it may be advantageous to also consider the inclu-
Quite a few ammonia plants were built in the 1960s sion of a further energy saving program and/or mod-
and early 1970s and these plants are now approaching ernizing the main reaction of the plant by adopting a
and/or exceeding their original design lifetime, usually preconverter. This is detailed by De Wit and Riezebos
estimated to be about 20-25 years. However, replacing (1999, 2000) and Verduijn and De Wit (2001).
them with newly designed plants has become exceed-
ingly expensive and, with the current volatile markets Overview of ammonia plants worldwide
(and politics), a gamble with respect to being able to
recoup the initial investment costs within a reasonable hi terms of bulk petrochemical production ammonia
timespan. Besides, where would one be able to build a takes pride of place internationally. The best feedstock
new petrochemical plant? Suitable sites are few in for the production of ammonia is natural gas though
number, whereas opposing pressure groups are many. other raw materials like naphtha and coal are also used.
For all these reasons and, no doubt, many more, all However, the majority (about 90%) of the internation-
directly or indirectly translatable into U.S. dollars or al production of ammonia is from natural gas or oil.
into the new European currency unit EURO, it makes Ammonia production has currently grown to an esti-
sense to reconsider closing a plant just for lifetime rea- mated level of 150 million tons/year. Since 1970 the
sons. Although, to continue operating an old plant in a ammonia production in Western Europe has remained
safe and economical way beyond its original design almost constant, the introduction of new plants was
lifetime requires a diligent inspection program in order limited, while old plants have become more produc-
The ammonia industry in the European Community Prolonged use of piping and pressure equipment may
produces approximately 11 million tons of ammonia result in construction materials deteriorating so much
per year (1994), in about 50 plants. Figure 1 shows an that the integrity of the piping and pressure equipment
overview of the age of these plants. Generally speak- cannot be guaranteed any longer. The main effects that
ing, all recently constructed EC plants have capacities may limit the lifetime of equipment can be categorized
in excess of 1,000 tons per day (tpd). Capacities up to roughly as follows:
1,800 tpd are not uncommon, although the typical size (1) Corrosion/erosion: A chemical reaction of kon at
of a large single train plant is in the range of 1,000 tpd exposed surfaces of steel with (usually) oxygen in one
to about 1,500 tpd. It is also worth noting that recently form or another in the contained medium. This reaction
developed technology allows high operation perform- may be enhanced by physical effects, such as high-liq-
ances at low capacity levels of about 400 tpd. uid velocities.
Of the 18 ammonia plants built in Europe between (2) Creep: A process whereby the material slowly
1967 and 1973, it is estimated that more than two- and progressively deforms with time under the action
thirds are in their original state, with little or no modi- of stress, for steels usually at elevated temperatures
fications. These plants are prime candidates for lifetime (400°C). Depending on the actual amount of stress, the
extension programs coupled with energy saving pro- temperature and the material, the creep process will
grams (De Wit and Riezebos, 1998; Riezbos, 2000; result in either rupture or unacceptable deformations in
Verduijn and De Wit, 2001). the structure.
(3) Chemical attack, penetrating: to be distinguished
10
9
8
.Q
l 7
6
§
I 4
'S
l 3
3
2
1
O 4
Figure 1: Number of ammonia plants built in the European Union against year of first commission.
43BESIOS-
ET6RNM.
TC- > "Eä
CORROSION
RISK
/
NO
EXIERti*'.
RISK
l
. Jf
> ~ log
500°C. These can be estimated realistically by assum-
ing a rectilinear relationship between the logarithm of
rupture time and the logarithm of minimum creep rup- Iog0i= log 56.9= 1.75511
ture stress. If one were to have two minimum rupture log &! = log 100,000 = 5
stresses for different time bases, but at the same tem-
perature, then the minimum creep rupture stress at the log tr2 = log 200,000 = 5.30103
considered temperature for any time basis, may be esti- log Rmimin(100,000 h 520°C) = 1.91593
mated by either linear interpolating or linear extrapo- log Rmmin(200,000 h 520°C) = 1.86213
lating. However, when extrapolating one should not go ===> t, (56.9 MPa, 520°C) = 1058997 = 794,000 h
beyond three times the longest available time base. In a similar way one establishes:
Denoting the minimum rupture stress with time basis tr(54.5 MPa, 520°C) = 1060043 = 1 010 000 h
IT and temperature 0 as Rm min^1"'®)'tnen two known
t,.(56.9 MPa, 500°C) = 10663M = 4 358 000 h
rupture stresses with time bases t^ and t^ are given as
t,.(54.5 MPa, 500°C) = 1067495 = 5 616 000 h
VminCtri;«) and VrainC^)' respectively. To esti- As extrapolation should not go beyond three times
mate the time basis ^ corresponding to a specific value the highest available time base, all estimates will be
of the minimum rupture stress Rm niiiA'®) =CT>a^ at reduced down to 600,000 h being three times 200,000
the same temperature 0, then one may use the follow- h.
ing formula: