0% found this document useful (0 votes)
316 views7 pages

Law of Torts MCQ

Uploaded by

Dibyansh Bagaria
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
316 views7 pages

Law of Torts MCQ

Uploaded by

Dibyansh Bagaria
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7
‘otisaspecal branch of Law which originated ir (@) America (b) France @ Ina @ England ans (dy [BJS 2009] ‘The definition of 'tort'is contained in- (@ The General Clauses Act, 1897 (t) TheLimitation Act, 1963 @ TheIndian Contract Act, 1872 (@) TheIndian Penal Code, 1860 Ans. (b) [AJs 2015), “Tont"is defined in the Limitation Act, 1963 un- detsection- @ 2) () 20) @ 2m) (@) 2) Ans. (c) [AJS 2015] The word "Tor is derived from the verd Tortum meaning "Twist'. © Bnglish (b) French iba (@ Greek fone) [ACS (Pre) 2016] "inp a eisted- : (b) volition a @ consent no. [ACS (Pre) 2014] stor has developed mainly through ® “toms ‘and precedents Accisions [WP.Hys 2016, ACS (Pre) 2014, 15; 5, Tripura JS 2015, WaJs 2015, Trip “e200 DEFINITION, ESSENT, TALS, NATURE ANDaR SCOPE 2 oer | Lawbench F TORTs The law of tort in India based on- © Common Law of England ) Droit Administatif of France © the Constitution of India © the Bill of Rights of Usa Ae FACS (Pre) 2013, 2016) Basically, tortis aspecies of- @) Criminal injury of wrong (b) Substantial injury of wrong © Civilinjury or wrong (@) None of the above Ans. (c) [AP.CS 2013, Tripura Js 2015, 2017, WBJS 2015, AJS 2011] ‘Whether for a wrong both tortious and criminal | liability may arise? | (@) Only tortious lability may arise | (b) Only criminal liability may arise (© Both the liabilities may arise (a) None of the above tin Ans. (c) Esa ‘The duty under the law of tortis cowards- (@ aspecficindividval (&) a group of individvals (© theworld atlarge @ Bon Bad ® Ans. (0) ‘Tortisa violation of (@) Rightin persona pys2012] ‘Scanned wih CemScanner 4. 16. 1. Lawbench Atortis breach of duty, which is- (@ imposed by the parties (©) imposed by the law (© imposed by the penal law @) imposed by the society Ans. (b) To constitute a tort- [BJs 2016] @) There must be some act or omission on the part of defendant (©) The act or omission should result in violating of legal right vested in the plaintiff © Both (A) & ®) (@) Either of the two Ans. (c) [WEJs 2015, TYs 2017] Which statements is correct for an act of tort? @ Itisacivil wrong (©) Allcivil wrongs are not tort © Itgives a right in rem @ Allof the above Ans. (4) [BJs 2016] "Tortious liability arises from the breach of a duty Primarily fixed by the law. This duty is towards Persons generally and its breach is redressible by an action for unliquidated damages." The above definition was given by- @ Winfield ©) Pollock © Salmond (@ None of them Ans. (a) Injurja sine damnum means- (@ inftingement of private legal rights without dam- age or loss (©) infringement of public legal rights without dam- age or loss © Both (A) and (B) are right (@ Both (A) and (B) ate wrong Ans. (a) [ACS 2016) Damnum sine injuria is a Latin maxim which means- (@)_ damage caused to plaintiff with legal injury (b) damage caused to plaintiff without legal injury [ACS 2013, BJs 2018] Ans. (a) © damage which is actionable (2) None of the above Ans. (b) UWBIS201, xcs ng . APEN, 82mm) "Ubi jus ibi remedium’ means (@ where theres tight, theres no remedy (©) there is no remedy without a wrong © there is no wrong without a remedy (@) thereiis no sight without a remedy Ans. (c) (AJS 2015, ACS 2013, n15 The propunder of Pigeon-Hole Theory is. @) Salmond ©) Winfield © Austin (@) None of the above Ans. (a) [BJS 2018, Tripura ys 2017 Who among the following holds that there is no "law of tort, but there is law of torts!? @ Salmond (©) Winfield © Both Salmond and Winfield @ Neither Salmond nor winfield ‘Ans. (a) [ACS 2014] Under the law of torts, the damages are- @ unliquidated (®) liquilated © limited @ unliquidated but limited ‘Ans. (a) [ACS 2015, U.P. HJS 2009) Inunliquidated damage, the damageis- @ pre-determined () fixed by the parties before hand © notpre-determined (@ Nolegal action involved Ans. (0) ‘Malice in law means- @ Wrongful act done intentionally but acs 2013, 41825) without ‘cause or exeuse — (®) Wrongful act done intentionally but orexcuse e seh good © ‘Wrong act done intensionaly is ie (@) Wrongful act done intentionally wi was oi a ‘Scanned with CemScanner Law of Torts 4. ‘Malice in fact’ means- ~~ eer (@ 8 wrongful act done intentionally without evil motive (&) awzongful act done without just cause () Imposition of moral blame © Compensation (A) Cotrective jstice 2 ~ Ans. (b) [ACs 2015) @ awrongful act done with good motive 26. The maxim ex turpi causa non oritur actio ‘means- (@ awrongful act done intentionally with evil motive @ fromaimmoral cause action arises ‘Ans. (4) [ACS 2015] () from an immoral cause no action atises 4, Which one of the following is not an objective of © froman immoral cause action mayor may not tise the law of torts? @ None of the above (@ Detemence Ans. (b) [ACs 2015] GENERAL DEFENCES 1 Volenti non fit injuria is- 5. Which of the following is nota general defence in @) adefence in an action founded on tort tore? (©) aground for initiation of action for tort @) Necessity © nota defence in an action for tore (©) Private defence (@ none of the above Ans. (a) [AJs 2015} 2 The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria’ means @) where there is no fault, thereis no remedy (©) mere knowledge does not imply consent to take tisk © (@) scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury Ans. (b) [BJs 2018] 3 "Necessityis available a a defence when the harm iscaused. ‘mere giving consent does not imply to take tisk ® topreventa greater evil ©) topreventa smaller evil © topreventno evil @ Allof the above Ans. (a) [ACs 2014] Aninevitable accident means- ® anactofGod (©) anunexpected injury which could not have been foreseen and avoided © an unexpected injury which could have been foreseen and avoided (@) Both (A) and (b) Ans, (b) [WBJS 2015, BJS 2012} Lawbenc © Consent (@) Economic instability Ans. (d) [ACS 2016 6 Which out of the following cannot be used as defences in an action for tort? @) Acts of State () Judicial acts © Statutory authority (@) Ataxpayer Ans. (4) 7. Rescue cases form an ex: of the doctrine of- [BJs 2009] ‘ception to the application (@) Necessity (b) Volenti non fit injusia (Inevitable accident @ None of the above Ans. (b) [ACS 2015] Consent given to undergo an operation cannot sue a surgeon later by the defence of- (@ Damnum sine i & (&) Injuria sine damnum © Ubi jus ibizemedium (@ Volenti non ft injuria , Ans. (d) 52016) ‘Scanned wih CamScanner | L Lawbench. JOINT TORTFEASO “The liability of joint tort feasors is- @ only joint (b) jointand several © only several (@ Neitherjoint nor several ‘Ans. () [acs 2014] 2. Theterm novus actus interveniens means- (@ Directness of damages (b) Remoteness of damages VICARIOUS LIABILITY, ‘The doctrine of vicarious liability applies when there is a- (@ Relationship of principal & agent (b) Relationship of partners © Relationship of master & servant (@ Alltheabove Ans. (d) [WBJs 2015, U.P. HJS 2014, ‘Tripura JS 2013, 2015, 2017] Master is liable for the torts committed by his servant- @) during the course of his employment () outside the course of his employment (© ither in os out of the course of his employment @ if the actis done for the benefit of the master ‘Ans. (a) [ACS 2013] 3. Under the doctrine of vicarious liability which ‘one among the following is correct? (@) Principals liable for the wrongful act of his agent. (b) Masteris liable for the torts of his servant. (© Partners are liable for each other's wrongful act (@ Allofthe above are correct. Ans. (2) [UP HJS 2014) In case of vicarious liability, the liability is- @ joint only (b) several only © jointandseversl (@) None of the above Joni [ACS 2015} ‘The liability of a master for acts of his servant in Law of Torts is called- Law of Torts RS & REMOTENESS OF DAMAGE. (© Dizect or remote damages (@) Foresceable damages Ans. (0) {ACS 20 Remoteness of damage can be uctermined by, (@ test of directness () test of closeness © test of relativity (d) test of reason as leness Ans. (a) FACS 201g STRICT AND ABSOLUTE LIABILITY (©) Tortious lability (d)_ None of the above [U.P. HJS2008] (@ Absolute liability © Vicarious liability Ans. (c) * Qui facit per aluim facit per se' means- (@) He who acts through others acts himself (b) He who has not the power of alienating is undet the necessity of retaining (© He who does not prohibit when he is able © prohibit, is in faule (@) He who is silent appears to consent Ans. (a) Qui facit per alium facit perse, armaximinlav of tort, is related with which act of tort? ys20!7 @) Capacity to sue (b) Negligence © Vicatious liability (@) Defamation ys2004 Ans. (c) ‘The maxim respondent superior means @) let the servant be held responsible () let the principal be held responsible © let the neighbour be held. responsible (d) Both (A) and (B) Ans. (b) pcs oe icable ‘The rule of strict liability is not applicable the 'escape' is due to- (b) Nedleen @ Mistake a © Inevitableaccident (4) et of CM ash P. Ans. (d) __ hee ‘Scanned with ComScanner + {. Thethree main forms of trespass to a person are. (@ assault battery and defamation @ assault, battery and false imprisonment (@ assault, battery and wrongful restraint (@) assault, battery and wrongful confinement ‘Ans. (b) TACs 2014) Assaults a- @ cime ©) tort of civil wrong © crime as well as tort (@ None of the above Ans. (c) [ACS 2015} Tospitata person deliberately is actionable asthe tort of- For the tort of false imprisonmen Fo % there should @ total estsin on the tberty fa person (©) partial restraint on the liberty of a person © means of escape © all of the above Ans. (a) {BJs 2012) "False imprisonment’ ‘Means, 7 (false restrain ofa person's liberty without lawful justification ©) a partial restraint of a lawful justification Person's liberty without @ assaule ©) date © ‘total restraint of person's liberty without lawful 7 al justification © Boh(A) and B) (4) Neither (A) nor ®) (@ apersonis imprisoned fora tortin alse charges Ans. ) [ACS 2014] Ans. (c) [bys 2018} NUISANCE | ~ 1 'Nuisance' as a tort was defined as “unlawful 4, ‘Nuisance can be- interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, of in connection with it" _ b enc h by © Pivateony | Q\VV @ Winkela (©) Salmona © Both public and private © Pollock @ Underhill (@) Neither public nor private Ans, (a) [Bys2012] Ans. (c) (AR&N.JS 2017] — | To constitute the tort of nuisance, the essentials enjoyment of land or some right over or in are- Connection with it" is known as tort of ' (@) unreasonable interference @ wespass nuisance | ») interference is with the enjoyment of land. spas: | © negligence @ conversion | © damage Ans, (b) [Bys 2018) (@ all of the above 3 Nuisance is- Ans. (4) [BJs 2015] @) fraudulent misrepresentation that induces another Which of the following remedies are available in to enter into a void contract an action in the tort of nuisance? (©) unlawful detention or physical restraint by a security 1, Abatement 2, Injunction guard ae © passing off another's goods and services as one’s own property : (@) any activity on an occupies's property that Untasonablyesfere withthe nelghbouts Sights to the enjoyment of his/her own property [WBJs 2018] 3, Specificrestitution 4. Action for damages Select the correct answer using the code ane is below: @ 1,2and4. © 2and4 Ane, (@) (@) tand3 @ 1,2,3a0d4. ‘Scanned with CamScanner Lawbench “7 NEGLIGENCE 1 Inthe wrong of negligence there is breach of = 4 (@ Legal duty of the defendant (b) Legal right of the defendant (© Of goods faith (@) None of the above @ mule of law (b) rule of procedure © ule ofevidence (€) rule of negligence The maxim res ipsa loquitor is a. ‘Ans. (a) [BJS 2009] A oat Me ‘ple fz ea 29 . Principle "facts speak for themuchey , 2 "Negligence is culpable carelessness." This expressed by the maxim. viewpoint was expressed by- (@ Ubi jus ibi remedium @) Pollock () Halsbury (b) Res jpsa Loquitur © Salmond @) Winfield (© ‘Novus Actus Interveniens Ans. (c) [Acs 2014] (@) Causa Causans 3. The standard of care required on the part of ‘Ans. (b) [UP.HYS2109 defendant in the tort of ‘negligence’ is of 6. Last opportunity rule is associated with- (@) highly skilled pezson (@) Absolute liability (©) any person of least understanding (b) Strict liability (© reasonable and prudent man © Volenti non fit injuria (@ aperson having legal understanding (@ Contributory negligence Ans. (c) [BJs 2016] Ans. (d) [AP cs200 DEFAMATION 1 Twotorts constituting "Defamation are- © Both under English law and the Indian (@) Libel and Slander (@ None of the above (©) Assault and Battery Ans. (a) wwys2051 © Absolute liability 4, Tort of defamation can be in respect of 8) Negigence @ living person only ‘Ans. (a) [ways 2018) One 2 Which of the following is not an element in ae establishing a case in libel? (@) Publication (b) A defamatory statement © A section of the public who know less of the 5+ phinsff [BJs 2018) 3. Defamationis divided intolibel and stander under. (@) English law only (©) Indian law only —_[_—$_$ © Both (@) and @) @ Ei ‘Ans. (c) Tn which of the following situations et (a) oF (b) Privilege apply? @ Acomplaine about a lawyer made 0 () Su © A statement made ina press @) A cartoon in a newspaper Ans. (b) ‘Scanned wih CamScanner eo iarnent rent made in the Parliament cconferen® oss ae Law of Torts ich one the following can be described as whic ee sution? malicious prose (9 Céiinal Proceeding (Money Recovery Proceeding (@ Bankruptcy Proceeding, (@ Liquidation Proceeding Ans. (a) 1 Malicious prosecution consists in- [BJs 2012] (@ Instirating unsuccessful criminal proceeding maliciously and without reasonable & probable cause (0) Instituting unsuccessful civil proceedings maliciously and without reasonable & probable cause © Both (a) & () (@) Neither (a) nor (b) Ans. (a) Inasuit for damages on the gr0" Prosecution, what is required to @ Thathe was prosecute (b) That the prosecution without 76% probable cause © Proceedings for: in favour of the plaintiff (@ Allof the above Ans. (a) [7ys 2013] und of malicious ibe proved by the » .d by the defendant onable and malicious prosecution wet ppys 2015 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, TRESPASS & CONVERSION 4. Principle of trespass to property constitutes of- oor Lawbench (@ unjustifiable physical encroachment of one person's land (©) injury to an unborn child © awisance (d) indirect consequence Ans. (a) Action for trespass can be brought by a person- [WBJs 2018] (@) in possession who is also owner (b) in possession even if he/she is not owner © not in possession (@) Both (@) and (b) Ans. (d) [ACS 2016] ‘Trespass to land is a wrong- g (@ against ownership (&) against possession (© against both ownership and possession (@ None of the above Ans. (b) [ACS 2013] Which of the following is the remedy for the trespass ofland? @ Reentry (b) Action for ejectment © Action for mesne profit (@ Allof the above Ans. (8) [Acs 2013] ‘Scanned wih CamScanner

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy