Scribd
Upload
2K views1 page

Research Rubrics For Oral Defense (Individual)

This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral defenses of individual research projects presented to a panel. The rubric assesses presenters on five indicators: delivery, organization, use of visual aids, familiarity with the subject matter, and preparedness. Each indicator is scored from 1 to 5, with a maximum total score of 80 points across all indicators. The document lists the title and presenters for an upcoming oral defense.

Uploaded by

Jamillah Ar Ga
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2K views1 page

Research Rubrics For Oral Defense (Individual)

This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral defenses of individual research projects presented to a panel. The rubric assesses presenters on five indicators: delivery, organization, use of visual aids, familiarity with the subject matter, and preparedness. Each indicator is scored from 1 to 5, with a maximum total score of 80 points across all indicators. The document lists the title and presenters for an upcoming oral defense.

Uploaded by

Jamillah Ar Ga
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

MANDAUE CITY COLLEGE

School of ____________ ___ Semester A.Y. 20__ - 20__

RESEARCH RUBRICS FOR ORAL DEFENSE (INDIVIDUAL)

Title of the Study:


__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________

Presenter 1 ____________________________________________________
Presenter 2 ____________________________________________________
Presenter 3 ____________________________________________________
Presenter 4 ____________________________________________________
Presenter 5 ____________________________________________________

Highest
Indicators 1 2 3 4 5
Rating
Delivery: Does the presenter’s voice, poise, and eye contact make a
favorable impression? Does the speaker have a clear delivery?
20
(Presenters may use notes but should not read from them or the
slides.)
Organization: Does the presentation have a logical organization?
Are the proposals sound and relevant? Does the speaker make clear 20
explanations of their specific part in the proposal?
Visual Aid/Instructional Technology: Has the presenter used
appropriated visual aid? PowerPoint presentation has not watered
10
down the content of the presentation. The presenter is not only
reading the content.
Familiarity and mastery of the subject: Does the presenter
demonstrate knowledge of the subject? Did the presenter answer the
20
questions fully and clearly? Is the presenter persuasive enough to
convince the audience?
Preparedness and Appropriateness: Is the presenter able to focus
and consistently show confidence during presentation? Is he or she 10
obviously well-prepared for his/her task?

TOTAL 80

____________________________________ __________________________________
Signature over Name of Panelist Noted by: Research Instructor

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy