Day 1 M11 OOS 2018
Day 1 M11 OOS 2018
QUALITY SYSTEMS
X edizione 2018
San Donato
University of Pisa
“Master Universitario di I livello”
X EDIZIONE - 2018
MANAGEMENT of HEALTH, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT and QUALITY SYSTEMS
dedicated to eni Upstream
1
Introduction and definitions
2
Hazards and Effects Management: HEMP
3
HSE Supervisor monitoring role, responsibilities and tools in operations
Program of the day
1
Introduction and definitions
2
Hazards and Effects Management: HEMP
3
HSE Supervisor monitoring role, responsibilities and tools in operations
Occupational health and safety
"Occupational health should aim at: the promotion and maintenance of the highest degree
of physical, mental and social well-being of workers in all occupations; the prevention
amongst workers of departures from health caused by their working conditions; the
protection of workers in their employment from risks resulting from factors adverse to
health; the placing and maintenance of the worker in an occupational environment
adapted to his physiological and psychological capabilities; and, to summarize, the
adaptation of work to man and of each man to his job.
"The main focus in occupational health is on three different objectives: (i) the maintenance
and promotion of workers’ health and working capacity; (ii) the improvement of working
environment and work to become conducive to safety and health and (iii) development of
work organizations and working cultures in a direction which supports health and safety at
work and in doing so also promotes a positive social climate and smooth operation and
may enhance productivity of the undertakings. The concept of working culture is intended
in this context to mean a reflection of the essential value systems adopted by the
undertaking concerned. Such a culture is reflected in practice in the managerial systems,
personnel policy, principles for participation, training policies and quality management of
the undertaking."
Joint ILO/WHO Committee on Occupational Health
Oil&Gas Industry Commitment to OH&S
The oil and gas industry has a strong safety record, despite a work environment that often involves
heavy equipment, hazardous materials, high temperatures and high pressures. Throughout the
world, oil and gas industry considers safety its top priority and is committed to developing the
technologies, standards and best practices, and programs needed to help ensure that workplace
safety is at the forefront of any activity.
OH&S Management System
10
Safety Leadership
Main goal of the safety: Zero incidents
The reaching at the end of the year of the goal of "zero injuries" can be
pursued through the commitment of all involved parties. They must be
constantly motivated and encouraged through development programs by
identifying clear and shared goals. Those who achieve their goals recognize
that a committed, consistent, visible leadership is the most effective tool at
their disposal to improve performances.
Roles and Responsabilities
Safety Leadership
Main goal of the safety: Zero incidents
16
Two possible approaches about own safety
Safety Compliance: the respect of the codes and rules about safety.
It indicates how much the risk perception is present among the
personnel.
Safety Caring: how much the personnel decides to adopt voluntary
actions in order to spread and improve organizational behaviour about
risk. It is an effective indicator of safety culture in the company.
17
Two possible approaches about own safety
Safety Caring
The involvement creates a real empowerment of workers: they develop a
greater personal commitment, perceive greater competence in dealing with
risks and a power of influence on the strategic, management and procedural
outcomes of work. It is ultimately to move from a reactive vision to a
proactive perspective in the management of safety and accident prevention
while maintaining focus on continuous improvement through forms of
collective learning.
18
Two possible approaches about own safety
Safety Caring
About safety of other people: taking care of the safety of the colleagues with
a preventive approach.
Take care of the Be attentive, aware,
Take care of himself Report and analyse
colleagues of each responsible in
near misses
level situations
Remove the error Remove the latent Learn from the errors
Monitor constantly
traps factors made
the situations
Commitment to
understanding the Understanding the
analysis of relevant causes of colleague
errors 19
events
Two possible approaches about own safety
Safety Caring
20
Safety Leadership
Everyone is safety leader
21
Safety Leadership
Everyone is safety leader
The capacity of leadership of everyone plays a fundamental role in the
promotion of the safety culture.
Every behaviour of everyone can influence the attitudes and behaviours
of the others
It is essential that each worker has the responsibility to create a work
context so to transfer the safety value
22
Safety Leadership
23
OH&S Definitions
M6 Industrial Safety - LINK
HAZARD ACCIDENT
NEARMISS ACCIDENT
OH&S Definitions
M6 Industrial Safety - LINK
Threats
Hazard
Top event:
27
OH&S Definitions
28
OH&S Definitions
M6 Industrial Safety - LINK
Occupational Safety:
deals with hazards due to accidents at work and to long-term effects of workers exposure to
hazards present on workplace (hazardous chemicals, noise, etc.)
Operational Safety:
deals with the management of all hazards present during constructions or maintenance
Target: humans
Magnitude: fatalities or injuries
Frequency: high
Severity: low
M6
Industrial Safety
LINK
M6 Industrial Safety - LINK
SEE MODULE M6
In any work environment (e.g. to R=FxM
fall off stairs, ..)
Specific
risks Major
risks
Reduce Likelihood
2) Mitigation measures: reduce/limit the severity of the consequences arising from a
released hazardous event.
Reduce Magnitude
OH&S Definitions
M6 Industrial Safety - LINK
Threats
Threat barriers
OH&S Definitions
M6 Industrial Safety - LINK
1
Introduction and definitions
2
Hazards and Effects Management: HEMP
3
HSE Supervisor monitoring role, responsibilities and tools in operations
OH&S Approach and Tools: HEMP
"The structured hazard analysis methodology involving hazard identification, assessment, control and
recovery and comparison with screening and performance criteria."
Objective of HEMP
To provide a structured approach towards the analysis of hazards throughout the life cycle of an asset.
This is achieved through use of structured tools and techniques that allow hazards to be identified,
assessed, and when fully understood in both situation and context, to be controlled and if necessary
recovered from if control is lost.
Hazard identification: recognizing that a hazard exists and defining its characteristics.
HEMP Process: Step 2
Risk assessment: evaluating the risk arising from an identified hazard, taking into account the
adequacy of any existing control, and deciding whether or not the risk is acceptable .
HEMP Process: Step 2
il
ta
S tr u c tu r e d R e v ie w
de
T e c h n iq u e s
of
el S ta n d a r d s
le v
g
s in
C h e c k lis ts
ea
cr
In
E x p e r ie n c e /
J u d g e m e n t
Id e n tify H a z a r d s
E v a lu a te R is k s
a n d E ffe c ts
ID E N T IF Y A S S E S S R e c o r d H a z a r d s
a n d E ffe c ts
H E M P
R E C O V E R C O N T R O L
E s ta b lis h R is k C o m p a r e w ith
R e d u c tio n O b je c tiv e s a n d
M e a s u r e s P e r fo r m a n c e C r ite r ia
HEMP Process: Tools available for Steps 1 and 2
UNLIKELY 1
MAY HAPPEN 2
LIKELY 3
VERY LIKELY 4
CERTAIN 5
Severity
Properly trained?
Condition of equipment
Availability of First-Aid
Deterioration from delayed treatment
Numbers exposed
Higher numbers of casualties
Risk Rating Matrix
Certain Very Likely Likely May Happen Unlikely
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Death
25 20 15 10 5
(5)
Over 3 day
15 12 9 6 3
injury (3)
Minor Injury
(treat. off site) 10 8 6 4 2
(2)
Minor Injury
(First Aid on 5 4 3 2 1
site) (1)
Risk Rating Matrix
Risk Rating Matrix
1) Enhance appreciation of OH&S risk and help in reducing the residual risk to As Low As
Reasonably Practicable (ALARP)
2) Assist in setting clear risk based strategic goals, objectives, targets and controls
3) Provide a systematic, structured and standardized basis for implementation of a risk-
based OH&S Management system
4) Provide consistency in evaluating and managing all activities, including contractor
activities
As Low As Reasonable Practicable (ALARP)
Establish the gap between the risk as evaluated in previous stages and
acceptable risk as defined in Company standards.
Provide a list of unacceptable risks ranked against severity of exposure and
likelihood of occurrence.
HEMP Process: Step 3
Substitution
Swap for something safer?
Engineering Controls
Physical controls to separate the worker from the
hazard?
Hierarchy of Controls
Administrative Controls
Procedures, safe systems, training
IDENTIFY
all
Loss Exposures
EVALUATE
the Risks
IMPLEMENT
MONITOR
64
Risk Management Model
65
Program of the day
1
Introduction and definitions
2
Hazards and Effects Management: HEMP
3
HSE Supervisor monitoring role, responsibilities and tools in operations
HSE Supervisor monitoring role, responsibilities and tools in operations
Risk based approach
Applying Permit To Work System
Toolbox Talk
HSE Tools STOP - Behavioural Based System
HEMP SIMOPS
Monitoring Emergency plan
HSE in Operations
Supervisor’s Main Responsibilities
Human Error – hazards and controls
Fires and explosions hazards and controls 1. No Harm to People
Mechanical hazards and controls 2. Protecting the Environment
Lifting operations hazards and controls 3. Earning the confidence of customers and
Electricity hazards and controls
Working at height hazards and controls stakeholders through sustainable
Confined spaces hazards and controls development
Slips trips and falls 4. Promoting a culture where all our
Movement of Plant and Vehicles hazards and controls
Groundwork and excavations hazards and controls
employees share this commitment
Other … The HSE Policy defines these goals
Hazards
Oil&Gas in Operations (Activity-Hazards) list:
Human Error
Fires and explosions
Mechanical hazards
Lifting operations
Electricity
Hazards
Oil&Gas in Operations (Activity-Hazards) list:
Working at height
Confined spaces
Slips trips and falls
Movement of Plant and Vehicles
Groundwork and excavations
Hazard classification
1. MECHANICAL
2. PHYSICAL
3. ELECTRICAL
4. BIOLOGICAL
5. CHEMICAL
6. ERGONOMIC
7. PSYCOLOGICAL
Mechanical Hazard
Electrical work
Biological Hazard
Employees
Directly involved
Affected by the process
Non-Employees
Visitors
Contractors
Members of the public
Groups at Particular Risk
Young people
New and expectant mothers
Home and traveling workers
Disabled persons
Lone workers
Maintenance workers
Monitoring HSE in Operations
General Measures and HSE tools
Monitoring HSE in Operations: General Measures
• Risk Assessments
• Safe Systems of Work
• Personal Protective Equipment
• Signs and Warning Signals
General Measures: Risk Assessment
The Task
The materials involved
The plant, machinery, equipment
The workplace
External environment
The people
PPE are HSE Tools too. The most important difference between PPE and
previous HSE tools is that PPE couldn’t permit to prevent but only
to protect single workers from a hazard.
Personal Protective Equipment: Limitations of PPE
Safety Signs are required by law and policy to inform personnel of local area
conditions and hazards
They may be visual or audible
They may be temporary or permanent but they MUST be in good condition
Think of some of the signs and warning systems you see regularly
The shape and colour of the sign is also an
indication of the type of information displayed
Round for Prohibition and Mandatory Signs
Triangular for Warning Signs
Square or rectangular for Safety information
and Condition Signs
Specific HSE Tools
The Work Permit Procedures may include specific types of permits e.g:
The STOP/BBS programmes support the HSE Policy commitment to implement safe
working and fitness to work programmes to pursue the goal of no harm to the
health of, or injury to, people and protect the environment and business assets. It
does this by active encouragement for personnel to plan and perform observations
in the workplace to identify and correct the root cause of unsafe behaviours before
they lead to incidents.
Process Flow
Planning of Observation EVERYONE has both the
Performing the Observation authority and
responsibility to STOP THE
Immediate intervention
JOB if there is any DOUBT
Completion of Observation Card about the safety of the
Tracking of Observation Data operation
Trending and Analysing Observation Data
Establishing Corrective Actions While unsafe conditions must
also be identified, the main aim
Implementation of Corrective Actions of safety observation is to
Reviewing Performance identify and eliminate hazardous
behavior
Specific HSE Tools
SIMOPS
A definition…
Those activities for which either functional group must advise the
other organisation whenever they are to be carried out;
Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) are defined as any two or more
different sets of activities (Macro-activities) carried out, within a
defined area, by different organizations (Functional Groups) or under
different management systems that, because of their proximity or
other critical factors, could interact adversely with each other.
SIMOPS are also:
Those activities for which dual authorisation is required;
When Operations (Production and Maintenance), Well Operations, General Projects,
Development or a Sub-Contractor (SIMOPS Originators) need to undertake or take
control of an activity simultaneously;
When new installed equipment at any location is formally handed over to Operations
and General Projects/Development or Sub-Contractor continues work at the same
location;
When an area that is formally handed over to General Projects/Development contains
currently operating process plant and equipment and General Projects/Development
commences additional work;
When Workover, Drilling rig or rigless activity operations are in close proximity to a
fixed facility (operational or under construction). Examples are activities such as well
clean up, testing and flaring. This SIMOPS situation has the potential to significantly
increase the risk due to activities occurring in close proximity;
When exploration seismic activities are performed near to a Unit area.
SIMOPS Used
The significant time and effort devoted to introduce SIMOPS in the North
field resulted in some 20 days of rig time reduction per well.
Combined with a further 10 days reduction through faster drilling,
total projected savings amount to 600 days or $135 million relative
to what was considered good performance.
Describe the process of Emergency Response Planning and to provide guidance and reference to the
personnel involved in these activities;
Identify the cross functional roles and responsibilities for organising, implementing and managing the
Emergency Response Planning process;
Introduce standardised tools and methodologies which can allow relevant Departments to effectively
manage their activities;
Describe the interactions and links with other workflows, procedures and processes in order to provide a
general framework for Emergency Response Planning process.
Define methods and approaches for managing the process of identification and definition of appropriate
Emergency Response Plan, including occupational health, safety and environmental emergencies, to
ensure that:
• Information relevant to the “residual risks” associated with operational activities are identified;
• Emergency scenarios are identified and consequences evaluation is carried out during the different
phases of the Operations Process and the correct behaviour to manage them is set;
• Emergency response plans are prepared and kept up to date;
• Suitable information is given to relevant Authorities.
Specific HSE Tools