PROJECT : PAGE :

CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Solar Carport Pole & Footing Design Based on AISC 360-16, ACI 318-19, and 2018 IBC 1807.3

DESIGN CRITERIA
1. If solar carport covered existing building without touched, the existing
building may not have to be brought to current IBC/CBC design.
2. Since the pole is cantilever column, so the maximum P, V, & M
(ASD level, wind upward may control) at the footing top, and
the design length is doubled 2H.
3. Since the footing is supported con-currently by lateral (embedded,
2018 IBC 1807.3, V & M1 coupled) and bottom soil (bearing,
ACI 318-19 13.3, P & M2 coupled), the (M1 + M2) should be
equals to total M, and M1 has to be determined by iterating.

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY

COLUMN SECTION (Tube, Pipe, or WF) HSS8X8X5/8 Tube
COLUMN YIELD STRESS Fy =
46 ksi, (317 MPa)
CANTILEVER HEIGHT H= 15 ft, (4.57 m)
COLUMN MAX SHEAR V= 3.2 kips, (14 kN)
(Strong Axis Bending only)
COLUMN MAX AXIAL LOAD P= 11.2 kips, (50 kN)
COLUMN MAX MOMENT M= 91 ft-kips, (123 kN-m)
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING D= 6 ft, (1.83 m)
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE Qa = 5.6 ksf, (268 kPa) THE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
LATERAL SOIL CAPACITY 0.35 PP = ksf / ft, (55 kPa / m)
RESTRAINED @ GRADE ?(1=yes,0=no) 1 Yes
DIMENTION L= 3 ft, (0.91 m) b = 2.5 ft, (0.76 m), concrete embedment depth
c= 12 in, (305 mm) (anchor bolts are always inadequate.)
CONCRETE fc' = 4.5 ksi, (31 MPa)

ANALYSIS
CHECK COMBINED COMPRESSION AND BENDING CAPACITY OF COLUMN (AISC 360 H1)

 P r 8  M rx M ry  P
     , for r  0.2
 P c 9  M cx M cy  Pc 0.92 < 1.0 [Satisfactory]
 
 P r  M rx M ry 
  , for P r  0.2 Where Pr = Mry =

2 P  M cx M cy  Pc
11.20 kips, 0 ft-kips
 c   Mrx = 91.00 ft-kips
Lc,y = KLy = 30.00 ft, weak axis unbraced axial length
Pc = Pn / Wc = 283 / 1.67 = 169.33 kips, (AISC 360 Chapter E)
> Pr [Satisfactory] (Pc / Pr) = 0.07 < 0.15
Mcx = Mn / Wb = 171.35 / 1.67 = 102.60 ft-kips, (AISC 360 Chapter F) , (AISC 341 E5.4a & E6.4a)
> Mrx [Satisfactory]
Mcy = Mn / Wb = 171.35 / 1.67 = 102.60 ft-kips > Mry [Satisfactory]

DETERMINE SOIL MOMENT CAPACITY, M1, UNDER V & L (2018 IBC 1807.3)
Pole depth, d = L = 3.00 ft
Lateral bearing @ bottom, S3 = 2 PP Min( d , 12' ) = 2.10 ksf
Lateral bearing @ d / 3, S1 = 2 PP Min( d / 3 , 12' ) = 0.70 ksf
Require Depth is given by

A 4.36 h 
 1  1   for nonconstrained
2  A  3.0 ft [Satisfactory]
d L 
 4.25Ph
 for constrained
 bS 3
Where M1 = 27.54 ft-kips A = 2.34 P / (b S1) = 1.28
P =V = 3.20 kips h = M1 / P + c = 8.61 ft

CHECK VERTICAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (ACI 318-19 13.3)

M2 = Max(M - M1 , 0) = 63.46 ft-kips
P= 11.20 kips
e = M2 / P = 5.67 ft
qsoil = 5.58 ksf, (net weight of concrete footing included.)
< Qa [Satisfactory] , x= 2.65 ft

CHECK FIXED MOMENT CONDITION AT e CONCRETE EMBEDMENT DEPTH (ACI 318-19 21 & 22)
1.5 M = 136.50 ft-kips, (LRFD level) < f Mn = 560.77 ft-kips [Satisfactory]
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 1 yes P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 3.2 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H= 28.44 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B= 6 ft H
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.35 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 1804.3.1 or UBC note 3 on Tab 18-I-A) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> D = 3 ft

Use 6 ft dia x 4.52 ft deep footing restrained @ ground level D

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  D , 12 '

LATERAL BEARING @ D/3 : D 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
 3 
2.34 P
A
BS 1
A 4.36 H 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
2 A 
REQUIRD DEPTH : D 
 4.25PH , FOR CONSTRAINED
 BS 3


NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 3.20 k 3.20 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H => 28.4 ft 28.4 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B => 6.00 ft 6.00 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.70 ksf / ft 0.70 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY D1 => 3.00 ft 3.00 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 0.70 ksf 0.70 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 2.10 ksf 2.10 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.78 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 8.38 ft 5.54 ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY D2=> 5.69 ft 4.27 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.33 ksf 1.00 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 3.98 ksf 2.99 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 0.94 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 5.89 ft 4.64 ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY D3=> 5.79 ft 4.46 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.35 ksf 1.04 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 4.05 ksf 3.12 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 0.92 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 5.83 ft 4.55 ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY D4=> 5.81 ft 4.50 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.36 ksf 1.05 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 4.07 ksf 3.15 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 0.92 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 5.82 ft 4.52 ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY D5=> 5.82 ft 4.51 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.36 ksf 1.05 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 4.07 ksf 3.16 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 0.92 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 5.82 ft 4.52 ft
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 1 yes P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 3.2 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H= #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B= 6 ft H
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.35 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 1804.3.1 or UBC note 3 on Tab 18-I-A) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> D = 3 ft

#REF! D

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  D , 12 '

LATERAL BEARING @ D/3 : D 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
 3 
2.34 P
A
BS 1
A 4.36 H 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
2 A 
REQUIRD DEPTH : D 
 4.25PH , FOR CONSTRAINED
 BS 3


NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 3.20 k 3.20 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H => #REF! ft #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B => 6.00 ft 6.00 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.70 ksf / ft 0.70 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY D1 => 3.00 ft 3.00 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 0.70 ksf 0.70 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 2.10 ksf 2.10 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.78 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY D2=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY D3=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY D4=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY D5=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 1 yes P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 3.2 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H= 14.37526 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B= 6 ft H
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.35 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 1804.3.1 or UBC note 3 on Tab 18-I-A) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> D = 3 ft

Use 6 ft dia x 3.60 ft deep footing restrained @ ground level D

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  D , 12 '

LATERAL BEARING @ D/3 : D 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
 3 
2.34 P
A
BS 1
A 4.36 H 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
2 A 
REQUIRD DEPTH : D 
 4.25PH , FOR CONSTRAINED
 BS 3


NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 3.20 k 3.20 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H => 14.4 ft 14.4 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B => 6.00 ft 6.00 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.70 ksf / ft 0.70 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY D1 => 3.00 ft 3.00 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 0.70 ksf 0.70 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 2.10 ksf 2.10 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.78 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 6.25 ft 3.94 ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY D2=> 4.63 ft 3.47 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.08 ksf 0.81 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 3.24 ksf 2.43 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.16 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 4.87 ft 3.66 ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY D3=> 4.75 ft 3.57 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.11 ksf 0.83 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 3.32 ksf 2.50 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.13 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 4.80 ft 3.61 ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY D4=> 4.78 ft 3.59 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.11 ksf 0.84 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 3.34 ksf 2.51 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.12 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 4.79 ft 3.60 ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY D5=> 4.78 ft 3.60 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.12 ksf 0.84 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 3.35 ksf 2.52 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.12 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 4.78 ft 3.60 ft
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 1 yes P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 3.2 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H= #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B= 6 ft H
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.35 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 1804.3.1 or UBC note 3 on Tab 18-I-A) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> D = 3 ft

#REF! D

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  D , 12 '

LATERAL BEARING @ D/3 : D 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
 3 
2.34 P
A
BS 1
A 4.36 H 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
2 A 
REQUIRD DEPTH : D 
 4.25PH , FOR CONSTRAINED
 BS 3


NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 3.20 k 3.20 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H => #REF! ft #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B => 6.00 ft 6.00 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.70 ksf / ft 0.70 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY D1 => 3.00 ft 3.00 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 0.70 ksf 0.70 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 2.10 ksf 2.10 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.78 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY D2=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY D3=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY D4=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY D5=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 1 yes P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 3.2 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H= #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B= 6 ft H
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.35 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 1804.3.1 or UBC note 3 on Tab 18-I-A) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> D = 3 ft

#REF! D

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  D , 12 '

LATERAL BEARING @ D/3 : D 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
 3 
2.34 P
A
BS 1
A 4.36 H 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
2 A 
REQUIRD DEPTH : D 
 4.25PH , FOR CONSTRAINED
 BS 3


NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 3.20 k 3.20 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H => #REF! ft #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B => 6.00 ft 6.00 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.70 ksf / ft 0.70 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY D1 => 3.00 ft 3.00 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 0.70 ksf 0.70 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 2.10 ksf 2.10 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.78 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY D2=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY D3=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY D4=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY D5=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 1 yes P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 3.2 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H= #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B= 6 ft H
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.35 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 1804.3.1 or UBC note 3 on Tab 18-I-A) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> D = 3 ft

#REF! D

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  D , 12 '

LATERAL BEARING @ D/3 : D 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
 3 
2.34 P
A
BS 1
A 4.36 H 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
2 A 
REQUIRD DEPTH : D 
 4.25PH , FOR CONSTRAINED
 BS 3


NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 3.20 k 3.20 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H => #REF! ft #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B => 6.00 ft 6.00 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.70 ksf / ft 0.70 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY D1 => 3.00 ft 3.00 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 0.70 ksf 0.70 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 2.10 ksf 2.10 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.78 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY D2=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY D3=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY D4=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY D5=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 1 yes P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 3.2 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H= #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B= 6 ft H
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.35 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 1804.3.1 or UBC note 3 on Tab 18-I-A) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> D = 3 ft

#REF! D

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  D , 12 '

LATERAL BEARING @ D/3 : D 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
 3 
2.34 P
A
BS 1
A 4.36 H 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
2 A 
REQUIRD DEPTH : D 
 4.25PH , FOR CONSTRAINED
 BS 3


NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 3.20 k 3.20 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H => #REF! ft #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B => 6.00 ft 6.00 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.70 ksf / ft 0.70 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY D1 => 3.00 ft 3.00 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 0.70 ksf 0.70 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 2.10 ksf 2.10 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.78 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY D2=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY D3=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY D4=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY D5=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 1 yes P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 3.2 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H= #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B= 6 ft H
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.35 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 1804.3.1 or UBC note 3 on Tab 18-I-A) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> D = 3 ft

#REF! D

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  D , 12 '

LATERAL BEARING @ D/3 : D 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
 3 
2.34 P
A
BS 1
A 4.36 H 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
2 A 
REQUIRD DEPTH : D 
 4.25PH , FOR CONSTRAINED
 BS 3


NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 3.20 k 3.20 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H => #REF! ft #REF! ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B => 6.00 ft 6.00 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.70 ksf / ft 0.70 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY D1 => 3.00 ft 3.00 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 0.70 ksf 0.70 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 2.10 ksf 2.10 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.78 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY D2=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY D3=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY D4=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY D5=> #REF! ft #REF! ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => #REF! ksf #REF! ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => #REF! - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => #REF! ft #REF! ft
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 1 yes P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 3.2 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H= 18.88 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B= 6 ft H
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.35 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 1804.3.1 or UBC note 3 on Tab 18-I-A) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> D = 3 ft

Use 6 ft dia x 3.94 ft deep footing restrained @ ground level D

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  D , 12 '

LATERAL BEARING @ D/3 : D 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
 3 
2.34 P
A
BS 1
A 4.36 H 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
2 A 
REQUIRD DEPTH : D 
 4.25PH , FOR CONSTRAINED
 BS 3


NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 3.20 k 3.20 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE H => 18.9 ft 18.9 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING B => 6.00 ft 6.00 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.70 ksf / ft 0.70 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY D1 => 3.00 ft 3.00 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 0.70 ksf 0.70 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 2.10 ksf 2.10 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.78 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 7.01 ft 4.51 ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY D2=> 5.01 ft 3.76 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.17 ksf 0.88 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 3.51 ksf 2.63 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.07 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 5.25 ft 4.03 ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY D3=> 5.13 ft 3.90 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.20 ksf 0.91 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 3.59 ksf 2.73 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.04 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 5.18 ft 3.96 ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY D4=> 5.16 ft 3.93 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.20 ksf 0.92 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 3.61 ksf 2.75 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.04 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 5.17 ft 3.95 ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY D5=> 5.16 ft 3.94 ft

LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D S1 => 1.20 ksf 0.92 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D S3 => 3.61 ksf 2.76 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1) A => 1.04 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD D => 5.17 ft 3.94 ft
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Circular Footing Design Based on ACI 318-19

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY

COLUMN DIAMETER dcol = 12 in
COLUMN DEAD LOAD PDL = 40 kips
COLUMN LIVE LOAD PLL = 38 kips
LATERAL LOAD (0=Wind, 1=Seismic) 0 Wind,SD
WIND AXIAL LOAD PLAT = 5 k, SD
WIND MOMENT LOAD MLAT = 39.5 ft-k, SD
WIND SHEAR LOAD VLAT = 0.15 k, SD
SOIL WEIGHT ws = 0.11 kcf
FOOTING EMBEDMENT DEPTH Df = 2 ft
FOOTING THICKNESS T= 18 in
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE Qa = 5.6 ksf
FOOTING DIAMETER D= 6 ft
CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 3 ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
FOOTING TOP REBAR # 4 @ 48 in o.c., each way
FOOTING BOTTOM REBAR # 6 @ 18 in o.c., each way
THE FOOTING DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
ANALYSIS
CHECK OVERTURNING FACTOR (IBC 1605.2.1, 1808.3.1, & ASCE 7 12.13.4)
MR / M O = 5.8 > F = 1.0 / 0.9 = 1.11 [Satisfactory]
Where MO = MLAT + VLAT T - PLAT(0.5 D) = 25 k-ft MR = (PDL+ Pftg + Psoil) (0.5 D) = 144 k-ft
Pftg = (0.15 kcf) p T D / 4 =
2
6.36 k, footing weight
Psoil = ws (Df - T) p D2/ 4 = 1.56 k, soil weight

COMBINED LOADS AT TOP FOOTING (IBC 1605.3.2 & ACI 318 5.3)
CASE 1: DL + LL P = 78.0 kips 1.2 DL + 1.6 LL Pu = 108.8 kips

CASE 2: DL + LL + 0.6(1.3) W P = 81.9 kips 1.2 DL + LL + 1.0 W Pu = 91.0 kips

M = 31 ft-kips Mu = 40 ft-kips
V = 0.1 kips Vu = 0.2 kips
e = 0.4 ft, fr cl ftg eu = 0.4 ft, fr cl ftg
CASE 3: DL + LL + 0.6(0.65) W P = 80.0 kips 0.9 DL+ 1.0 W Pu = 41.0 kips
M = 15 ft-kips Mu = 40 ft-kips
V = 0.1 kips Vu = 0.2 kips
e = 0.2 ft, fr cl ftg eu = 1.0 ft, fr cl ftg

CHECK SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (ACI 318 13.3.1.1)

Service Loads CASE 1 CASE 2 CASE 3

P 11.2 11.2 11.2 k
e 5.7 5.7 5.7 ft (from center of footing)
Pftg - Psoil 5.1 5.1 5.1 k, (footing increasing)
SP 16.3 16.3 16.3 k, (net loads)
e 3.9 3.9 3.9 ft
qmin 0.58 0.00 0.00 ksf
x @ 2.65 ft, from edge @ 2.65 ft, from edge
qmax 0.58 5.58 5.58 ksf
qallowable 5.60 7.47 7.47 ksf

[Satisfactory]

CHECK FLEXURE & SHEAR OF FOOTING

(ACI 318 13, 21, & 22)

 T 4  0.85 1 f c' u
 MIN  MIN  0.0018 ,   MAX 
 d 3  f y u t
 Mu 
0.85 f c  1  1  
'

 0.383b d 2 f c' 
  
fy
 (cont'd)
FACTORED SOIL PRESSURE
Factored Loads CASE 1 CASE 2 CASE 3
Pu 108.8 91.0 41.0 k
eu 0.0 0.4 1.0 ft
g[0.15T + ws(Df - T)] A 9.5 9.5 7.1 k, (factored footing & backfill)
S Pu 118.3 100.5 48.1 k
eu 0.0 0.4 0.8 ft
qu, min 4.18 1.68 0.00 ksf
x @ 0.00 ft, from edge @ 0.28 ft, from edge
qu, max 4.18 5.43 3.58 ksf

FOOTING MOMENT & SHEAR FOR CASE 1

Section 0 1/10 D 2/10 D 3/10 D 4/10 D Center 6/10 D 7/10 D 8/10 D 9/10 D D
Xu (ft, dist. from left of footing) 0 0.60 1.20 1.80 2.40 3.00 3.60 4.20 4.80 5.40 6.00
Tangent (ft) 0.00 3.60 4.80 5.50 5.88 6.00 5.88 5.50 4.80 3.60 0.00
TA ( ft2 ) 0.00 1.47 2.55 3.11 3.43 7.15 3.43 3.11 2.55 1.47 0.00
Mu,col (ft-k) 0 0 0 0 0 0 65.28 130.56 195.84 261.12 326.4
Vu,col (k) 0 0 0 0 0 54.4 108.8 108.8 108.8 108.8 108.8
qu,ftg & fill (ksf) 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34
Mu,ftg & fill (ft-k) 0.00 0.00 0.30 1.11 2.55 4.68 8.25 12.51 17.40 22.80 28.50
Vu,ftg & fill (k) 0.00 0.25 0.92 1.87 2.97 4.75 6.53 7.63 8.58 9.25 9.50
qu,soil (ksf) -4.18 -4.18 -4.18 -4.18 -4.18 -4.18 -4.18 -4.18 -4.18 -4.18 -4.18
Mu,soil (ft-k) 0 0 -3.6941 -13.8 -31.71 -58.223 -102.69 -155.76 -216.63 -283.92 -354.9
Vu,soil (k) 0 -3.0784 -11.5 -23.346 -37.019 -59.15 -81.281 -94.954 -106.8 -115.22 -118.3
S Mu (ft-k) 0 -1.6987 -3.3974 -12.692 -29.163 -53.547 -29.163 -12.692 -3.3974 -1.6987 0
S Vu (kips) 0 -2.8312 -10.577 -21.471 -34.046 0 34.046 21.4714 10.5766 2.83119 0

FOOTING MOMENT & SHEAR FOR CASE 2

Section 0 1/10 D 2/10 D 3/10 D 4/10 D Center 6/10 D 7/10 D 8/10 D 9/10 D D
Xu (ft, dist. from left of footing) 0 0.60 1.20 1.80 2.40 3.00 3.60 4.20 4.80 5.40 6.00
Tangent (ft) 0.00 3.60 4.80 5.50 5.88 6.00 5.88 5.50 4.80 3.60 0.00
TA ( ft2 ) 0.00 1.47 2.55 3.11 3.43 7.15 3.43 3.11 2.55 1.47 0.00
Mu,col (ft-k) 0 0 0 0 0 -19.9 14.8 69.4 124 178.6 233.2
Vu,col (k) 0 0 0 0 0 45.5 91.0 91.0 91.0 91.0 91.0
qu,ftg & fill (ksf) 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34
Mu,ftg & fill (ft-k) 0.00 0.00 0.30 1.11 2.55 4.68 8.25 12.51 17.40 22.80 28.50
Vu,ftg & fill (k) 0.00 0.25 0.92 1.87 2.97 4.75 6.53 7.63 8.58 9.25 9.50
qu,soil (ksf) 1.68 2.05 2.43 2.80 3.18 3.55 3.93 4.30 4.68 5.05 5.43
Mu,soil (ft-k) 0 0 -1.7363 -7.0365 -17.343 -33.907 -65.069 -103.97 -150.54 -203.99 -261.7
Vu,soil (k) 0 -1.5118 -6.1265 -13.588 -23.396 -41.555 -60.998 -74.422 -87.087 -96.782 -100.5
S Mu (ft-k) 0 -0.7198 -1.4397 -5.9282 -14.796 -49.132 -42.023 -22.057 -9.1476 -4.5738 0
S Vu (kips) 0 -1.2646 -5.203 -11.714 -20.423 8.69544 36.5289 24.2037 12.4895 3.47141 0

FOOTING MOMENT & SHEAR FOR CASE 3

Section 0 1/10 D 2/10 D 3/10 D 4/10 D Center 6/10 D 7/10 D 8/10 D 9/10 D D
Xu (ft, dist. from left of footing) 0 0.60 1.20 1.80 2.40 3.00 3.60 4.20 4.80 5.40 6.00
Tangent (ft) 0.00 3.60 4.80 5.50 5.88 6.00 5.88 5.50 4.80 3.60 0.00
TA ( ft2 ) 0.00 1.47 2.55 3.11 3.43 7.15 3.43 3.11 2.55 1.47 0.00
Mu,col (ft-k) 0 0 0 0 0 -19.9 -15.2 9.4 34 58.6 83.2
Vu,col (k) 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0
qu,ftg & fill (ksf) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Mu,ftg & fill (ft-k) 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.83 1.91 3.51 6.18 9.38 13.05 17.10 21.38
Vu,ftg & fill (k) 0.00 0.19 0.69 1.41 2.23 3.56 4.90 5.72 6.43 6.94 7.13
qu,soil (ksf) 0.00 0.38 0.94 1.51 2.07 2.63 3.19 3.75 4.31 4.87 3.58
Mu,soil (ft-k) 0 0 -0.196 -1.2293 -3.8862 -9 -20.632 -36.055 -55.521 -78.805 -104.58
Vu,soil (k) 0 -0.1831 -1.1478 -3.4456 -7.2557 -15.636 -25.262 -32.576 -39.916 -45.804 -48.125
S Mu (ft-k) 0 0.01322 0.02645 -0.3981 -1.9763 -25.393 -29.647 -17.274 -8.4729 -4.2364 0
S Vu (kips) 0 0.00236 -0.4552 -2.0394 -5.0261 8.42634 20.6336 14.143 7.51615 2.13616 0
 (cont'd)
FOOTING MOMENT & SHEAR SUMMARY
Section 0 1/10 D 2/10 D 3/10 D 4/10 D Center 6/10 D 7/10 D 8/10 D 9/10 D D
Xu (ft, dist. from left of footing) 0 0.60 1.20 1.80 2.40 3.00 3.60 4.20 4.80 5.40 6.00
Tangent (ft) 0.00 3.60 4.80 5.50 5.88 6.00 5.88 5.50 4.80 3.60 0.00
Case Mu, (ft-k / ft) 0 -0.4719 -0.7078 -2.308 -4.9607 -8.9245 -4.9607 -2.308 -0.7078 -0.4719 0

Uniform Loads
1 Vu, (k / ft) 0 -0.7864 -2.2035 -3.9045 -5.7913 0 5.79134 3.90453 2.20346 0.78644 0
Case Mu, (ft-k / ft) 0 -0.2 -0.2999 -1.078 -2.5169 -8.1886 -7.1482 -4.011 -1.9057 -1.2705 0
2 Vu, (k / ft) 0 -0.3513 -1.084 -2.1301 -3.474 1.44924 6.2137 4.40139 2.60197 0.96428 0
Case Mu, (ft-k / ft) 0 0.00367 0.00551 -0.0724 -0.3362 -4.2322 -5.0431 -3.1412 -1.7652 -1.1768 0
3 Vu, (k / ft) 0 0.00066 -0.0948 -0.3709 -0.855 1.40439 3.50984 2.57188 1.56586 0.59338 0

CHECK FLEXURE
Location Mu,max d (in) r min rreqD rmax smax rprovD
Top Slab 0.0 ft-k / ft 15.75 0.0000 0.0000 0.0155 no limit 0.0003
Bottom Slab -8.9 ft-k / ft 14.63 0.0010 0.0008 0.0155 18 0.0017 [Satisfactory]

CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR

Vu,max fVc = 2 f b d (fc')0.5 check Vu < f Vc
6.2 k / ft 14 k [Satisfactory]

CHECK PUNCHING SHEAR (ACI 318 13.2.7.2, 22.6.4.1, 22.6.4.3, & 8.4.2.3)

P u  R 0.5 v M u b1 A P  2  b1  b 2  d
v u ( psi )    v c ( psi )    2  y  f 'c
AP J 1
 v  1
 d b3    d  2  4 d 
1  1   b 2   1
2 b1
y  MIN  2, , 40 
J     3  3 b2   b 
 6    b1   c 0
   b1  
 D2 b0
P u b1b 2 Af 
4 b 0    d col  d  , b1  b 2 
R 4
Af

Case Pu Mu b1 b2 b0 gv bc y Af Ap R J vu (psi) f vc
1 108.8 0.0 21.4 21.4 7.1 0.4 1.0 2.0 28.3 9.0 12.2 5.4 74.5 164.3
2 91.0 39.8 21.4 21.4 7.1 0.4 1.0 2.0 28.3 9.0 10.2 5.4 62.4 164.3
3 41.0 39.8 21.4 21.4 7.1 0.4 1.0 2.0 28.3 9.0 4.6 5.4 28.2 164.3
[Satisfactory]
where f = 0.75 (ACI 318 21.2)
 ROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Plate Girder Design Based on AISC Manual 13th Edition (AISC 360-05)

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY

STEEL YIELD STRESS Fy = 46 ksi
SIMPLY SUPPORTED SPAN S= 15 ft
SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM DEAD LOAD DL = kips / ft
UNIFORM LIVE LOAD LL = kips / ft
POINT DEAD LOAD PDL = kips
POINT LIVE LOAD PLL = kips
DISTANCE POINT LOAD TO END c= ft
TOP FLANGE WIDTH bf,top = 8.15 in
TOP FLANGE THICKNESS tf,top = 0.445 in
BOTTOM FLANGE WIDTH bf,bot = 8.15 in
BOTTOM FLANGE THICKNESS tf,bot = 0.445 in
WEB THICKNESS tw = 0.445 in
BEAM DEPTH d= 8.02 in 1/4 x 3 STIFFENER, E. SIDES, AT SUPPORTS ONLY.
UNBRACED LENGTH Lb = 15 ft FLANGE TO WEB WELDING USE 1/4 in - 24 in @ 2866 in o.c.

THE GIRDER DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CHECK LIMITING WIDTH-THICKNESS RATIOS FOR WEB (AISC 365-05 Table B4.1)
h c / tw = 16.02 < lr = 143.12
< lp = 94.41
Compact Web
where E= 29000 ksi
lr = 5.7 (E / Fy)0.5 = 143.12
l p = (hc / hp) (E / Fy)0.5 / (0.54 Mp / My -0.09)2 = 88.43 ,for Af,top ≠ Af,bot
lp = 3.76 (E / Fy)0.5 = 94.41 ,for Af,top = Af,bot
hc = 7.13 in hp = 7.52 in
Mp = 128.8 ft-kips My = 114.2 ft-kips

CHECK LIMITING WIDTH-THICKNESS RATIOS FOR FLANGES (AISC 365-05 Table B4.1)
0.5 bf,top / tf,top = 9.16 < lr = 26.16
< lp = 9.54
Compact Flanges
where lr = 1.0 (kc E / FL)0.5 = 26.16
lp = 0.38 (E / Fy)0.5 = 9.54
kc = Min [0.76 , Max (0.35 , 4 / (h / hw)0.5 )] = 0.76
Sxt = 30 in 3 Sxc = 30 in3
FL = 32 ksi, (AISC 360-05 Table note B4.1 & Eq F4-6)

DETERMINE CRITERIA FOR ALLOWABLE FLEXURAL STRENGTH (AISC 365-05 Table F1.1)

Chapter F Sections
Required Conditions F2 F3 F4 F5
Double Symmetric x x
Compact Web x x
x
Noncompact Web
Slender Web Mallowable = Mn / W b = 66.8 ft-kips
Compact Flanges x ( from following analysis)
Noncompact Flanges
Slender Flanges
Applicable Section ok

DETERMINE ALLOWABLE FLEXURAL STRENGTH , Mn / W b , BASED ON AISC 365-05 Chapter F2

E 7.18 ft
L p  1.76r y 
Fy

2
E Jc  0.7 F y S x h 0  E
L r  1.95r ts 1  1  6.76
 E    r ts  29.40 ft
0.7 F y S xh0  Jc  0.7 F y
where ry = 1.95 in Sx = 30 in3
h0 = 7.58 in Iy = 40 in4
 (cont'd)
Cw = Iy h02 / 4 = 578.11 , (AISC 365-05 F2.2)
J = [tw d (tw2 + d2)] / 12 = 19.1883 in4, (not applicable if taken web only, EIT Manual page 26)
(Use J= 0.77 in4 )
rts =[( Iy Cw)0.5/ Sx)]0.5 = 2.26 in
c= 1.0 Cb = 1.0 , (AISC Manual 13th Table 3-1, page 3-10)

2
C b 2E Jc  L b 
F cr  2
1  0.078    74.115 ksi
 Lb  S x h0  r ts 
 
 r ts 

 M p , for L b  L p

    Lb  L p  
M n, F 2   Min  C b  M p   M p  0.7 F y S x  
   , M p  , for L p  L b  L r
  111.6 ft-kips
 
 L r L p  
  


 Min  F S
cr x , M p  , for L r  L b

Mallowable, F2 =Mn / Wb = 66.8 ft-kips where Wb = 1.67 , (AISC 365-05 F1)

DETERMINE ALLOWABLE FLEXURAL STRENGTH , Mn / W b , BASED ON AISC 365-05 Chapter F3

<== Not Applicable.

     pf  
  M p   M p  0.7 F y S x  
  rf   pf  
, for Noncompact Flanges
  
M n, F 3     129.9 ft-kips
 0.9 E k c S x
 , for Slender Flanges
 2

where l = bf / (2 tf) = 9.16

lpf = lp = 9.54 lrf = lr = 26.16

Mallowable, F3 =Min(Mn,F2 , Mn,F3) / Wb = 66.8 ft-kips

DETERMINE ALLOWABLE FLEXURAL STRENGTH , Mn / W b , BASED ON AISC 365-05 Chapter F4

<== Not Applicable.

E 5.24 ft
L p  1.1r t 
Fy

2
E J  S h 
L r  1.95r t 1  1  6.76 F L xc 0   29.60 ft
FL S xc h 0  E J 

where aw =hc tw/ (bfc tfc) = 0.87

b fc
rt   2.28 in
 1 2 
12  h 0  a w h 
 d 6 h 0d 

Mp = Min [Zx Fy , 1.6Sxc Fy ] = 128.8 ft-kips

Myc = Sxc Fy = 114.233 ft-kips Myt = Sxt Fy = 114.233 ft-kips
l = h c / tw = 17.02
lpw = lp = 88.43 lrw = lr = 143.12

Mp
 , for h c / t w   pw
 M yc

R pc   1.12752
 Min  M p   M p  1     pw  , M p
for h c / t w   pw
       ,
  M yc  M yc    rw   pw  M yc 

2
C b 2E J  Lb 
F cr  2
1  0.078    74.789 ksi, (for Iyc / Iy = 0.50 > 0.23, AISC 360-05 F4-5 )
 Lb  S xc h 0  r t 
 
 rt 

 R pc M yc , for L b  L p

    Lb  L p   
M n, F 4.2   Min  C b  R pc M yc   R pc M yc  F L S xc   
   , R pcM yc  , for L p  L b  L r  109.2342 ft-kips

    L r L p   

 Min  F cr S xc , R pc M yc  , for L r  L b

 (cont'd)
 R pc M yc , for Compact Flanges

     pf 
 R pc M yc   R pc M yc  F L S xc    , for Noncompact Flanges
M n, F 5.3      rf   pf  128.8 ft-kips
 

 0.9 E k c S xc
 , for Slender Flanges
 2
M p
 , for h c / t w   pw
 M yt
R pt   1.12752
 Min  M p   M p  1     pw  , M p  , for h c / t w   pw
      
  M yt  M yt    rw   pw  M yt 

Mallowable, F4 = Min( Mn,F4.2 , Mn,F4.3, RptMyt) / Wb = 65.4 ft-kips

DETERMINE ALLOWABLE FLEXURAL STRENGTH , Mn / W b , BASED ON AISC 365-05 Chapter F5

<== Not Applicable.
E
Lr   r t  17.90 ft
0.7 F y

 F y , for L b  L p

    Lb  L p  
 Min  C b  F y   0.3F y     
, F y ,

for L p  L b  L r
  
  L r L p   

F cr , F 5.2     35.3609 ksi
  
  C b 2E 
 Min  2
, F y  , for L r  L b
   Lb  
 
 r  
  t  

 F y , for Compact Flanges


     pf  
  F y   0.3F y     , for Noncompact Flanges
    rf   pf  
F cr , F 5.3    46 ksi
 0.9 E k c , for Slender Flanges
 2
  b f 
  2t f 
 
 Min  a w , 10   hc E  
R pg  Min 1    5.7  , 1.0   1
 1200  300Min  a w , 10  t w
 
Fy  
  
Mallowable, F5 = Min( RpgFySxc , RpgFcr,F5.2Sxc , RpgFcr,F5.3Sxc , FySxt) / Wb = 52.6 ft-kips

DETERMINE ALLOWABLE SHEAR STRENGTH , Vn / Wv , BASED ON AISC 365-05 Chapter G2

h = d - tf,top - tf,bot = 7 in , h / tw = 16 , Aw = 3.57 in2 ,

a= 14.8 ft 
1.0 , for h / t w1.10 k vE
 5  Fy
5 2
, for a / h3 
kv    a / h  5.00
 1.10 k vE k vE k vE 1.000
 Cv  , for 1.10 h / t w1.37 
5 , for a / h 3 h /tw F y Fy Fy

Vn = 0.6 FyAwCv = 98.5016 kips  1.51E k v , for 1.37 k vE  h /
 h/ tw
  t w F y
2
 Fy

Vallowable = Vn / Wv = 58.983 kips Wv = 1.67 , (AISC 365-05 G1)

TOTAL SUPERIMPOSED GRAVITY LOAD

w = DL + LL = 0.000 kips / ft , P = PDL + PLL = 0.00 kips

CHECK EACH SECTION CAPACITIES

Section Left 0.00 S 0.00 S 0.00 S 0.00 S 0.00 S Point 0.17 S 0.33 S 0.50 S 0.67 S 0.83 S Right
Distance 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 5.00 7.50 10.00 12.50 15.00
d (in) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
y (in) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
I (in4) 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118
Wt (plf) 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5
V (kips) 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.00 -0.18 -0.09 0.00 0.09 0.18 0.27
M (ft-k) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0
 (cont'd)

BENDING LOADS & CAPACITY

Moments
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
Length

Mmax = 0.9978343 ft-kips @ 7.50 ft, from heel.

< Mallowable = 66.8351 ft-kips
[Satisfactory]
S h ear F o rces

SHEAR LOADS & CAPACITY

-58.00

-58.50

-59.00

-59.50
Length

Vmax = 0.27 kips @ 15.00 ft, from heel.

< Vallowable = 58.983 kips [Satisfactory]

DETERMINE DEFLECTION AT MID SPAN

5w L 4 0.06415 Pb
 L 2 b 2  
3/ 2
 DL   0.01 in ( L / 15192 )
384 EI EIL (for camber, self Wt included.)

where E= 29000 ksi w= 0.035 kips / ft

I= 118 in4 P= 0 kips
b= 0.3 ft L= 15.0 ft

5w L 4 0.06415 Pb
 L 2 b 2  
3/ 2
 LL   0.00 #DIV/0!
384 EI EIL

where P= 0 kips w= 0.000 kips / ft

DETERMINE FLANGE TO WEB WELDING (AISC 360-05 J2.4 )

w= 1/4 in
wmin = 3/16 in, < w
wmax = 5/16 in, > w
W= 2.0
Vmax = 0.27 kips
Q = Af(d - y - 0.5 tf,top) = 14 in3
vmax = Vmax Q / I = 0.03 kips / in

A= 24 in B
 0.6 F EXX   0.707 w A  2866 in. o.c.
v max 
USE 1/4 in - 24 in @ 2866 in o.c.

DESIGN STIFFENERS

1. BEARING STIFFENERS ARE REQUIRED AT EACH END SUPPORT. (AISC 360-05, J10.8)

2. CHECK LOCAL WEB YIELDING FOR THE CONCENTRATED LOAD. (AISC 360-05, J10.2)
R=P= 0.00 kips
N= 0 in, bearing length, point.
k = tf,top + w = 0.70 in
W= 1.5

 R
 , for c  d
 t w  N  5k 
  0.00 < Fy / W [Satisfactory]
 R
, for c  d
 t
 w  N  2.5 k 
 (cont'd)
3. CHECK WEB CRIPPLING FOR THE CONCENTRATED LOAD. (AISC 360-05, J10.3)

W= 2.0
  1.5 
 2 N  t w   EF ywt f , for c0.5 d
0.80t w 13 d  
 t f   tw
  
Rn /   1 /    91.49 > P [Satisfactory]
  1.5 
0.40t w 13 N
2  t w   EF ywt f
   , for c0.5 d
  d  t f  tw

  

(Note : If item 2, local web yielding is Satisfactory, this item does not need to be checked.)

4. CHECK SIDESWAY WEB BUCKING FOR THE CONCENTRATED LOAD. (AISC 360-05, J10.4)
dc = d - 2k = 6.63 in
Cr = 960000 ksi
(dc / tw ) / (l / bf) = 0.67
W= 1.76
  3
 C r t wt f 0.4  d c / t w   , for d c / t w 1.7
3

 h2   l /b f   l /bf
    

 C r t wt f
3   
3
Rn /   1 /   1 0.4 d c / t w   , for 1.7 d c / t w  2.3  51.66 > P [Satisfactory]
 h
2   l /b f   l /b f
   

 d c / t w  2.3
P , for l /
 bf



(Note : If item 2, local web yielding is Satisfactory, this item does not need to be checked.)

5. DETERMINE STIFFENER SIZE.

tw = 1/4 in , bst = 3 in

bst / tw = 12.00 < 0.56 (E / Fy)0.5 , (AISC 360-05 Table B4.1)

[Satisfactory]
Ag = 3.88 in2 , I= 6 in4

R= 0.3 kips
Wc = 1.67 , (AISC 365-05 E1)
Kl/r= 0.75 h / ( I / Aeff)0.5 = 4.4
Cc = 4.71 (E/ Fy)0.5 = 118

 2E  14502.71 ksi
Fe 
 kl / r  2
 Fy kl
 0.658 F e  F y , for  Cc
  r
R n / c  A g / c   106.6 kips, (AISC 360-05 E2)
 kl
 0.877 F e , for r  C c > R [Satisfactory]

Techincal Reference:
1. AISC: "Steel Construction Manual 13th Edition", American Institute of Steel Construction, 2005.
 PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Fixed Moment Condition Design Based on ACI 318-19

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY

COLUMN SHAPE (Tube, Pipe, or WF) & SIZE HSS8X8X5/8 < == Tube d A bf
8.0 16.4 8.0
CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 4.5 ksi
FACTORED SHEAR LOAD Vu = 4.8 kips
FACTORED MOMENT Mu = 136.50 ft-kips

FACTORED VERTICAL LOAD (negative for uplift) Pu = 16.8 kips

EMBEDMENT DEPTH D= 30 in

THE FIXED MOMENT DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

( Avf = 0.0 in2 , Required Area of Shear Studs or Welded Reinforcement)
( Edge of Concrete Footing / Grade Beam must be wider than "bf")

ANALYSIS
CHECK BASE FLEXURAL & SHEAR CAPACITY (ACI 318 21 & 22)

400
350
300
f Vn (k)
250 
200
150
100 
50
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600

f Mn (ft-k)

f Mn = 561 ft-kips @ Vu = 5 kips

2 f C'  A2 
o  0.85Min 
'
, 2  , E c  57 f C > Mu = 137 ft-kips
Ec  A1  [Satisfactory]
   2
 f Vn,max =
0.85Min  A2 , 2  ' 2   c     c   , for 0   352.55 kips, when C = 20.6 in
  f C     c o Vu =
  A1     o    o   > 4.8 ft-kips [Satisfactory]
fC
  A2  where f= 0.65 , (ACI 318 21.2)
0.85Min  , 2  f C' , for  c   o Bearing factor = 2, (ACI 318 14.5.1.1)
  A1 
b = effective bearing width = 95% bf = 7.60 in

CHECK VERTICAL CAPACITY

f Pn = End Bering + Friction = 369.5 kips > Pu = 16.8 kips [Satisfactory]
where End Bering = 0.65 (2) 0.85 fc' A = 81.5 kips, (ACI 318 14.5.1.1)
Friction = 0.75 MIN( 0.2fc' Ac , 800 Ac ) = 288.0 kips, (ACI 318 22.9.4)
A= 16 in2, end bearing area
Ac = 0.5 (2d + 2bf ) D = 480 in2, (0.5 for concrete cracked)
Avf = Pu,Friction / (f fy m) = 0.0 in , Required Area of Shear Studs or Welded Reinforcement
2

where f= 0.75 , (ACI 318 21.2)

m = 0.70 , (ACI 318 22.9.4.2)
fy = 60 ks