100% found this document useful (1 vote)
416 views16 pages

Hydraulic Calculation For 18+430

This document provides hydraulic calculations for a proposed bridge over a river in Madhya Pradesh, India. It includes calculations of design discharge (350.239 cubic meters per second) using three different methods, design velocity (5.387 meters per second), design flood level (387.829 meters), and scour depths at piers and abutments (381.156 meters and 381.346 meters, respectively). It also calculates afflux using Molesworth's formula. The calculations are performed to inform the design of the bridge foundations and ensure adequate hydraulic conveyance under the bridge.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
416 views16 pages

Hydraulic Calculation For 18+430

This document provides hydraulic calculations for a proposed bridge over a river in Madhya Pradesh, India. It includes calculations of design discharge (350.239 cubic meters per second) using three different methods, design velocity (5.387 meters per second), design flood level (387.829 meters), and scour depths at piers and abutments (381.156 meters and 381.346 meters, respectively). It also calculates afflux using Molesworth's formula. The calculations are performed to inform the design of the bridge foundations and ensure adequate hydraulic conveyance under the bridge.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

MADHYA PRADESH ROAD

DEVLOPMENT Doc. HYDRAULIC


Client:
CORPORATION LTD. No. CALC.
45-A AREAHILLS,BHOPAL-462011

Widening and reconstruction of MP MDR UP


Project: PKG 19 Maalapoor-Varchar-Mandur road (MP-MDR-18-12) &
Sonda -Sakdi -Umraeth -Bakhatgarh Road (MP-MDR-18-14)

Total Length Of One Total Length Of


No of Span 3 8.m 24.m
Span Bridge

Hydraulic Calculation For Slab Type Minor Bridge


Bridge At Ch - 18+430

REVISION - R1
Widening and reconstruction of MP MDR UP
PKG 19 Maalapoor-Varchar-Mandur road (MP-MDR-18-12) & Sonda -Sakdi -Umraeth -
Bakhatgarh Road (MP-MDR-18-14)
Hydraulic Calculation For Slab Type Minor Bridge Bridge At Ch - 18+430
E. HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS :- Detailed Hydraulic calculations are enclosed.

Following additional data is required for carving out hydraulic calculation.

1.0 Nature of the stream:


Nature of the stream is required for accessing the value of Coefficient of Rugosity
values given in the following table may be adopted.

RUGOSITY COEFFICIENT :
Value of "n" in the formula V = 1/n x R2/3 x S1/2

SURFACE PERFECT GOOD FAIR BAD

Nature of streams:
1 Clean, straight bank full stage, No. 0.025 0.0275 0.03 0.033
rifts of deep pools.

2 Same as ( l ),but some weeds and 0.03 0.33 0.035 0.04


stones.

3 Winding, some pools and shoals, 0.035 0.04 0.045 0.05


clean.

4 Same as (3) lower stages, more 0.04 0.045 0.05 0.055


ineffective sloe & sections.

5 Same as (3) same weeds and stones. 0.033 0.035 0.04 0.045

6 Same as (4) story section. 0.045 0.05 0.055 0.06

7 Sluggish river reaches, rather weedy 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08


or with very deep pools

8 Very weedy reaches. 0.075 0.1 0.125 0.15

Nature of streams : Winding, some pools and shoals, clean.

Recommended value of n = 0.040


2.0 Nature of the bed material:

This is required for finding out Lacey's Silt Factor (I).Extracts of the table in clause 110.1.3 of
IRC: 5-1998(Section 1) are given here.

Type of Bed Mean dia. Of particle in mm Value of (f)


Material

Coarse silt 0.040 0.350

Silt/Fine sand 0.081 to 0.158 0.500 to 0.700

Medium sand 0.233 to 0.505. 0.850 to 1.250

Coarse sand 0.725 1.50


Fine Bagri and 0.988 1.75
sand
Heavy sand 1.290 to 2.000 2.000 to 2.420

Note :- Mean Diameter of Particle shall be determined as Per Appendix-2 if IRC: 5-1998.

From this table, following values pertaining to the river stream is given:

Type of bed material : SILTY SAND

Mean diameter of particle in mm : 2


Value of (f) : 2.49

3.0 Whether the river is in deep forest or wherein floating trees are observed :- No

4.0 Nature of Catchment Area : 14.4 Sq. Km.

The value of coefficient (C) in Dicken's formula depends upon the nature of the catchment area.
The following values may be adopted for different type of catchment areas in M.P.
Value of C
1 Annual Rainfall 60-120 cm 11-14

2 Annual Rainfall > 120 cm 14-19

5.0 Nature of Catchment Area (Annual Rainfall) : 60-120 cm


Recommended value of C : 14.00
6.0 Design Discharge :-
This may be calculated from the following empherical formula :

6.1 By Dicken's formula:

Q = CM3/4
Where Q = Discharge in Cumecs.
C = Constant
M = Catchment area in Sq. Km.

6.2 By Manning's formula (Area Velocity method):

Q = A X V (Where Q is Discharge in Cu.m.)

V = 1/N X R2/3 X S1/3

A = Area of stream in Sq. M. under HFL

V = Velocity in M/SEC

n = Rugosity Coefficient

R = Hydraulic mean depth in M

R = A/P in M.

P = wetted perimeter of river in M.

S = Longitudnal Bed Glop.

6.3 By Rational formula for Peak run-off from Catchment (CA up to 15 Sq. Km.)

As per Article 4.7 of IRC: 13-2004

Q=0.056 A Io f P/ (tc + 1)

Where Q is Discharge in Cumecs


A = Catchment Area in Hectares

Io = One hour rainfall in the region in cm

F = Coefficient as per Fig. 4.2 of IRC: SP: 13-2004

P = Coefficient as per Table given below

Tc = (0.87 x L3/H)0.385
Tc = Concentration time in hours

L = Distance from the Critical point to structure in Km.

H = Fall in level from the Critical point to Structure in M.

Catchment Area Characteristics P


Steep, bare rock and also city pavements 0.90

Rock, steep but wooded 0.80

Plateaus, lightly coveted 0.70


Clayey soils, stiff and bare 0.60
……....do……….. lightly covered 0.50
Loam , lightly cultivated or covered 0.40

…………….. do …………... Cultivated 0.30

Sandy soil , light growth 0.20


……….do ……….. covered , heavy brush 0.10

Considered value of =0.6

6.4 Summary of discharges:

• By Catchment area method : 103.490 Cu. m/sec


• By area velocity method
350.239 Cu. m/sec
• By Rational Formula : 170.013 Cu. m/sec

6.5 Design discharge : 350.239 Cu. m/sec

Note :- The highest of these (there) values should be adopted as design discharge provided it does
not exceed the next highest discharge by more than 50%. If it does not, restrict it to that limit.

7.0 Design velocity : 5.387 m/sec

V = Design velocity / Area of cross section at bridge Site below design H.F.L.

8.0 Design flood level : 387.829

9.0 Scour depth

a) Observed scour depth

If the proposed bridge site is neat an existing railway or road bridges, the scour depth at pier of
existing bridge may be observed and recorded.
b) Calculated scour depth: To Provide for an adequate margin of safety, the foundation shall be
Designed for enhanced discharge, as given below, over the design discharge as determined at 5.5
above.

Catchment Area in sq. Km. % Increase over Design Discharge

0-3,000 30

3,000-10,000 30-20

10,000-40,000 20-10

Above 40,000 10

Note:- For intermediate values of Catchment Area , linear interpolation may be done.

Normal Scour depth D = 1.34 (q2/f)1/3

Where q = linear discharge per meter width in Cumecs (calculated as per formula below)

F = Silt factor (As per table given at E 2)

q = Enhanced design discharge/ min. of clear width between the faces of Abutments at HFL or
Theoretical linear waterway = C√Q in meter

Where ,

C = A constant ranging from 4.5 to 6.3 (usually taken 4.8 for regime condition)

Q = Design discharge as determined at 5.5 above

Scour depth at peir = 2 x D below HFL

Scour depth at abutments = 1.27 x D or lowest bed level whichever is max. Below HFL.

Calculated values of

(a) Scour level of Pier : 381.156


(b) Scour level at abutment : 381.346
Note: - For Sesmic condition and other conditions, scour depth shall be calculated as per clause
703.3 of IRC: 78-2000.

10.0 Afflux: Calculated by Moles worth formula

Afflux = {V2/17.88 + 0.015} x {(A/a)2 1) in M.

V = Average velocity of the stream in M/sec.

A = Unobstructed Area of the cross section at HFL in sq. M.

A = Area of clear waterway under the bridge at HFL in sq. M.

Calculated afflux = 0.424 m (Considered)


Note: - If calculated afflux is then 0.15 M, adopt value of Afflux as 0.15 M.

F. SUMMARY

1.0 Summary of hydraulic data:

• Catchment area : 14.40 Sq. Km.


• Design discharge : 350.24 cum/sec
• Design Velocity : 5.315 m/sec
• Normal Scour depth : 6.28 m from HFL
• Scour level at
Pier : 381.156 RL
• Abutment A1 : 381.346 RL
• Abutment A2 : 379.756 RL
• H.F.L. : 387.829 RL
• Afflux : 0.4240
• Afflux Flood level : 388.25 RL
• L.W.L. : R.L Dry Stream
• Minimum vertical clearance
required : 1.2 M

2.0 Tentative proposals of the Bridges:

• Length of the Bridge : 24


• Span arrangement : 3x8
• Formation level : 392.00
• Soffit level : 391.13
• Type of Foundation : Open foundation
• Type of Substructure : P.C.C abutment(M-20) , R.C.C Pier(M-25)
P.C.C. Return wall
• Type of bearings : Tar paper bearing
• Type of decking : R.C.C. deck slab
Widening and reconstruction of MP MDR UP
PKG 19 Maalapoor-Varchar-Mandur road (MP-MDR-18-12) & Sonda -Sakdi -Umraeth -Bakhatgarh
Road (MP-MDR-18-14)

Hydraulic Calculation For Slab Type Minor Bridge Bridge At Ch - 18+430

Basic Data
1) Catchment area of the bridge in sq.km = 14.4 SQ.KM
2) Coefficient of Rugosity = 0.04 Table 3 SP 13
3) Shape of Catchment = Basin Shape
4 ) Charactristics of Catchment = Plain
4) Hydraulic Gradient of River (slope) = 0.010669

1.) Estimation of Flood Discharge by Empirical Formula

A.) Mannings Formula


AT BRIDGE LOCATION

Where V = velocity in m/sec = 3.297 met /sec


A = area in met2 = 70.82668 Sq.met
P = Wetted Perimeter in met = 49.10047 R.met
I = Hydraulic Gradient = 0.010669
n = Rugosity Coefficient = 0.04 SP-13 Table -5.1 page-18
R = Hydraulic mean depth = A/P = 1.442485

first elevation 385.52


last elevation 381.03

I = Hydraulic Gradient = Difference of Level


Total Distance

= (385.521-381.03)
420.938
= 0.010669
\ V = 1/n x R2/3 X S 1/2
= 3.297 Met/sec
\Q= A x V
= 233.493 Cu.met/Sec

Maximum Discharge From Mannig Is 233.5Cu.Met/Sec

hydraulic calculation for 18+430 Page 8


B.) Dicken's Formula (SP-13 Clause 4.2)

Q = C x M3/4

Q = Peak Run-off in Cu.met/sec


M = Catchment Area in Sq.KM
C = 11 to 14 where the annual rainfall is 60 cm to 120 cm
= 14-19 in Madhya Pradesh
= 22 in Western Ghats

M= 14.40
C= 14.00 0.800

\Q= 103.490 Cu.met/Sec

C.) Ryve's Formula (SP-13 Clause 3.3)

Q = C x M2/3

Q = Peak Run-off in Cu.met/sec


M = Catchment Area in Sq.KM
C = 6.8 for areas within 25 km of the Coast
= 8.5 for areas between 25 and 160 km of the coast
= 10.0 for limited areas near the Hills

M= 14.40 Sq. KM.


C= 10.00

\Q= 59.189 Cu.met/Sec

D.) Ingli's Formula (SP-13 Clause 4.4)


125𝑀
𝑄=
𝑀 + 10
Q = Peak Run-off in Cu.met/sec
M = Catchment Area in Sq.KM

M= 14.40 Sq. KM.

\ Q = 364.399 Cu.met/Sec
Max Discharge of the Above Calculation = 364.399 Cu.met/Sec

hydraulic calculation for 18+430 Page 9


2.) Estimation of Flood Discharge by Rational Formulae

Q = A x I0 x l
Q = Peak Run-off in Cu.met/sec
A = Area of Catchment in Hectares 1440.00
I0 = One-hour rainfall In cm 7.15
0.056 x f x P
l=
tc + 1
tc = The Concentration time in hours

0.395
L3
tc = 0.87 x H

L = Distance from the critical point to the culvert in m 6580.00

BED LEVEL AT CULVERT 394.00


BED LEVEL AT UP STREAM 633.00
H = The fall in level from the critical point to the culvert In met. 239.00

tc = 1.01

f = is the fraction depend on the catchment area Fig 4.2, SP-13 0.99
P = Percentage co-efficient of run-off for the catchment characteristics 0.6

l= 0.0165125
Q= 170.01275 Cu.met/Sec

Design Discharge = Maximum of 103.49 , 59.189 , 170.013 , 233.493 , 364.399


Design Discharge = 350.239 Cu.met/Sec as per cl.6.2.1

4.) Establishing HFL for Design Discharge by Conveyance Factor


and Slope of the Stream (After Construction)

Q=AxV

Establised HFL for Design Discharge = 387.829

A = Area of C/S at river bed in sq. met. 80.578


V = Velocity of Flow m/sec
2 1
1 3 2
V= R S
n
Where
n = Rugosity Co-efficient = 0.04
P = Wetted Perimeter in met = 26.740
R = Hydraulic mean depth = A/P 3.013
S = Slope

S = Slope = 0.01067

Velocity in met/sec 5.39

Discharge = 434.098 Cu.met/Sec

hydraulic calculation for 18+430 Page 10


5.) Calculation of Maximum Discharge

Maximum Discharge= 350.239


Percentage Increase of Design Discharge 30 %

\ Design Discharge in Cu.met/Sec Q= 455.31 Cu.met/Sec

6.) Calculation Regime Width and Scour Depth

1/2
Regime Width of Water way = W = 4.8 x Q

W = 102.42 met

Ksf = 1.76Sdm Where dm = 2

Silt Factor Ksf = 2.49

Restricted Waterway = 27.75 met.

455.31
Db = = 16.408
27.75

d = 6.28 met
Scour Level for Box Culvert = HFL-d = 381.545
Difference Between Box invert and Scour Level = 4.254 m

Maximum Scour Depth of Pier = D = 2 x d = 12.569 met


Scour Level for Pier = HFL-2d = 375.260

Maximum Scour Depth of Abutment = D = 1.27 x d = 7.981 met


Scour Level for Abutment = HFL-1.27d = 379.848
7.) Calculation for Afflux

h = Afflux in met
V = Velocity of un-obstracted stream in met/sec = 3.30
2
A = Un-obstracted sectional area of the river in met = 85.38
2
a = Obstracted sectional area of the river in met = 65.89 ( From Autocad)

Obstructed Area
sub section -1 = 2.144
DIA OF
HFL-
PIER/ THK
sub section -2 = x INVERT x NOS=2
OF
LVL
hydraulic calculation for 18+430
INTERNAL Page 11
= 1.5 X 7.3425 = 14.685

sub section -3 = 2.657

h = 0.42400 met
AHFL = HFL + h
AHFL = 387.829 + 0.424
AHFL = 388.253 met

8.) Summary

Sr. No. Hydraulic Features Details


1 Catchment Area in Sq. KM. 14.40
2 Design Discharge in Cu.met/Sec 350.24
3 Establised HFL in met 387.829
4 Afflux HFL in met 388.253
5 Nos. of Span 3
6 Total Length Of One Span 8.000
7 Bottom of Super Structure 391.125
8 Thickness of Super Structure in met 0.800
9 Thickness of Wearing Coat/earth cushion in mm 75
10 Finished Road Level in met 392.000
11 Vertical Clearance 2.872
12 Permissible Vertical Clearance 1.200
13 Scour Level for Pier 381.156
14 Scour Level for Abutment A1 381.346
15 Scour Level for Abutment A2 379.756
15 Founding Level for Pier 381.156
16 Founding Level for Abutment A1 381.346
17 Founding Level for Abutment A2 379.756
17 % Obstruction 22.823
18 Obstructed Velocity in met/sec 5.315
AS FOUNDATION IS RESTING ON THE ROCK SO NO NEED TO CALCULATE THE
SCOURING LEVEL

hydraulic calculation for 18+430 Page 12


Widening and reconstruction of MP MDR UP
PKG 19 Maalapoor-Varchar-Mandur road (MP-MDR-18-12) & Sonda -Sakdi -Umraeth -Bakhatgarh Road (MP-MDR-18-14)

L-SCTION OF RIVER / NALLA FOR CH.18+430

L-SECTION OF RIVER
ch R.l.
0 385.521 Location of bridge
33.889 385.216 182.487
50.034 385.017
68.638 384.687
82.696 384.673
99.146 384.639
122.951 384.496
140.417 384.324
153.5395 383.948
172.3947 383.784
182.4867 382.930
199.1937 382.676
216.3177 382.601
242.7937 382.271
261.8027 382.045
277.0817 382.204
294.2867 381.939
309.3047 381.865
326.1637 381.826
341.1377 381.525
357.7237 381.450
375.8517 381.311
398.7857 381.212
420.9387 381.030
L-SECTION OF RIVER / NALA

386.000
385.521
385.500
385.216
385.017
385.000
384.687
384.673
384.639
384.496
384.500
384.324
383.784
384.000

383.500 383.948
382.930

383.000
382.601
382.500 382.271 382.204
382.045
382.000 Location of bridge 382.676 381.865 381.450
381.525
381.939
381.500 381.826 381.212
381.030
381.000 381.311

380.500
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
2.) Wetted Area & Wetted Perimeter Calculation for Natural Stream
MINOR BRIDGE Bridge at CH-18+430
AT BRIDGE LOCATION
Difference
Bed Flood Depth Mean Depth Length in Area in Perimeter
Chainage HFL in Depth in
Level in met in met met met2 in met
met
0 388.277 386.282 0.000 - - - - -
12.782 385.59 386.282 0.688 0.344 17.776 6.115 0.688 17.789
17.653 383.833 386.282 2.449 1.568 4.871 7.640 1.761 5.180
28.481 382.930 386.282 3.352 2.900 10.828 31.407 0.903 10.866
42.033 385.799 386.282 0.483 1.917 13.552 25.986 2.869 13.852
47.768 386.415 386.282 0.000 0.242 -1.329 -0.321 0.483 1.414
55.501 386.989 386.282 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
64.795 388.13 386.282 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

70.827 49.100

389

388

387

386
Bed Level
385 HFL

384

383

382
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

CROSS SECTION OF RIVER


4.) Wetted Area & Wetted Perimeter Calculation After Bridge Construction
MINOR BRIDGE Bridge at CH-18+430
Bed Flood Depth Mean Depth Length in Area in Difference in Perimeter SUB -
Chainage HFL
Level in met in met met met2 Depth in met in met Section
0 390.485 387.829 0.000 - - - - -
0.761 385.799 387.829 2.030 1.015 0.330 0.335 2.030 2.057
6.761 382.934 387.829 4.895 3.463 6.000 20.775 2.865 6.649
14.82 383.833 387.829 3.996 4.445 8.059 35.826 0.899 8.109
2
22.273 385.591 387.829 2.238 3.117 7.453 23.231 1.758 7.658
23.076 390.485 387.829 0.000 1.119 0.367 0.411 2.238 2.268

80.578 26.740

0.761 385.799 387.829 0.000 - - - - -


0.486 386.099 387.829 1.730 0.865 1.586 1.372 1.730 2.347
-2.559 392.000 387.829 0.000 0.865 0.893 0.772 1.730 1.947 1
-2.809 392.000 387.829 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2.144 4.294
22.273 385.591 387.829 0.000 - - - - -
22.548 385.891 387.829 1.938 0.969 1.776 1.721 1.938 2.629
25.593 392.000 387.829 0.000 0.969 0.966 0.936 1.938 2.165 3
25.843 392.000 387.829 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2.657 4.794

393.000

392.000

391.000

390.000

389.000

388.000

387.000

386.000

385.000

384.000

383.000

382.000
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy