100% found this document useful (2 votes)
1K views37 pages

Regional Memorandum No 39 S 2021

Regional Memorandum
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
1K views37 pages

Regional Memorandum No 39 S 2021

Regional Memorandum
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 37
‘DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION IMAROPA Region RECORDS SECTION RELEASED 2033 Released By:__O8 Department of Curation he ee MIMAROPA REGION Office of the Regional Director April 27, 2021 REGIONAL MEMORANDUM No._34_s. 2021 IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES ON THE UTILIZATION OF THE ENHANCED SCHOOL- BASED MANAGEMENT (SBM) ASSESSMENT TOOL WITH CONTEXTUALIZED MEANS OF VERIFICATIONS (MOVs) TO: Schools Division Superintendents Chief Education Supervisors, SGOD ‘SBM Coordinators Public Elementary and Secondary School Heads ‘The Department of Education- MIMAROPA Regional Office, through the Field Technical Assistance Division, issues the enclosed Implementing Guidelines on the Utilization of the enhanced School-Based Management (SBM) Assessment Tool with contextualized Means of Verifications (MOVs) and the template for the gathering of data and information as input to the automated instrument to be used by all public elementary and secondary schools within DepEd MIMAROPA Region. ‘The enhanced SBM assessment tool with the scoring template which could be downloaded at bit.ly/esbmat3 and the contextualized MOVs as Enclosure 2, shall be officially used as an instrument in assessing the schools’ SBM level of practice in the seven (7) Schools Division Offices (SDOs) of DepEd MIMAROPA Region. ‘The conduct of orientation and advocacy campaign on the guiding principles of the enhanced SBM assessment process and tool and the corresponding SBM practice is directed before conducting the assessment proper. ‘These implementing guidelines shalll be effective immediately upon issuance. ‘The following documents are enclosed for information and guidance of all concerned: Enclosure 1 - Implementing Guidelines on the Utilization of the Enhanced SBM Assessment Tool with Contextualized MOVs Enclosure 2 - SBM Assessment Tool with Contextualized MOVs Enclosure 3 - SBM Assessment and Validation Interview Guide Enclosure 4 - Indicative Schoo! Program during SBM Validation Enclosure 5 - Timeline of SBM Activities Enclosure 6 - Division SBM Annual Action Plan and Target Template Enclosure 7 - Template on the Submission of SBM Validated Schools Enclosure 8 - Template for Certificate of Recognition FTAD/MF Meralco Avenue corner St. Paul Road, Pasig City Telephone No.: (02) 9413760 / Email Address: mimaropa.region@deped.gov.ph 6. Provisions contained in previous Regional issuances inconsistent with this Memorandum are hereby repealed. 7. Any concern on this matter shall be directed to the Field Technical Assistance Division, Attention Dr. Wendell I. Formalejo, Chief Education Supervisor, or Dr. Manolo F. Perez, Education Program Supervisor/ Regional SBM Focal Person, at Mobile No. 09196984594, 8. Immediate dissemination of and strict compliance to this Memorandum is directed. ae NICOLAS #. LONG, PhD, CESO V Director IV Office of the Regional Director Encl: As stated Reference: DepEd Order: No. 83 s. 2012 ‘To be indicated in the perpetual index under the following subjects: School-Based Management Enclosure 1 to Regional Memorandum No. 3° s. 2021 IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES ON THE UTILIZATION OF THE ENHANCED SCHOOL- BASED MANAGEMENT (SBM) ASSESSMENT TOOL WITH CONTEXTUALIZED MEANS OF VERIFICATIONS (MOVs) 1 General Provision Section 1, Background and Rationale ‘The Department of Education (DepEd) has stepped up its efforts to intensify the implementation of School-Based Management (SBM) through a comprehensive package of policy reforms to sustain and expand the gains of the school along with teacher education development, teaching strategies, quality assurance, monitoring and evaluation, and organizational development. Several policies were formulated such as the conduct of assessment on school SBM level of practice, the establishment of School Governing Council (SGC), requiring the school to have School Improvement Plan (SIP), and conduct of reporting on accomplishments through School Report Card (SRC). ‘The implementation of Republic Act 9155, otherwise known as Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001, provided the mandate for decentralizing the system of school management and recognizes the role of the Local Government Units and other stakeholders as partners in the delivery of basic education. Hence, the Department of Education launched the Schools First Initiative (SFI) to empower the school and stakeholders to effectively address access and quality issues. In consonance with the above mandate, the Department issued DepEd Order No. 83, s. 2012, stipulating the desire to further strengthen the implementation of SBM and putting the system of education as learner-centered, and emphasize the involvement of the stakeholders in the delivery of basic education. This has led to the journey of the schools to embark on revisiting the SBM level of practice of their school through the conduct of self-assessment. In MIMAROPA Region, the Regional Office, through the Field Technical Assistance Division (FTAD) has revisited the existing SBM Assessment tool with contextualized ‘MOVs and the automated instrument to further improve and establish the relevance of the documents that shall categorically satisfy the standards required for each indicator of the four principles of SBM. The MOVs were designed primarily to emphasize the involvement of the stakeholders in the management and operation of the school and the delivery of basic education. Section 2. References + 1987 Philippine Constitution ‘+ Republic Act 9155 of 2001 ‘*DepEd Order No. 83. 2012 Section 3, Acronyms and Definition of Terms ACCESs- A Child and Community-centered Education Systems AIP. Annual Implementation Plan DOD- Document Analysis, Observation, and Discussion DSCT-Division SBM Coordinating Team DTACTS- Division Technical Assistance Composite Teams MOA- Memorandum of Agreement MOOE- Maintenance and other Operating Expenses ‘MOU- Memorandum of Understanding ‘MOVs- Means of Verifications PT- Project Team RACCs- Relevance, Accuracy, Currency, Consistency, and Sufficiency RFTACTs-Regional Field Technical Assistance Composite Teams RSCT-Regional SBM Coordinating Tear ‘SBM- School-Based Management S8GC-School Governing Council SIP- School improvement Plan SPT- School-community Planning Team SRC- School Report Card SSCT-School SBM Coordinating Team Advanced (Accredited Level) - SBM level of practice-Level 3 Ensuring the production of intended outputs/ outcomes and meeting all standards of ‘a system fully integrated into the local community and is self-renewing and self- sustaining. Artifacts — are things used by the school community to achieve educational goals, e.g. Daily Lesson Log (DLL), Enhanced School Improvement Plan (ESIP), ete. Assessment- refers to the wide range of methods or tools that educators use to evaluate, measure, and document the academic readiness, learning progress, skills, acquisition, or educational needs of students. Developing - SBM level of practice-Level 1 Developing structures and mechanisms with acceptable levels and extent of community participation and impact on the learning outcomes. Maturing ~ SBM level of practice-Level 2 Introducing and sustaining a continuous improvement process that integrates wider community participation and improves significantly performance and learning outcomes. Stakeholder ~ refers to anyone who invested in the welfare and success of a school and its students, including administrators, teachers, staff members, students, parents, families, community members, local business leaders, and elected officials such as school board members, city councilors, and state representatives. May also refer to collective entities, such as local businesses, organizations, advocacy groups, committees, media outlets, and cultural institutions, in addition to organizations that represent specific groups, such as teachers’ unions, parent-teacher organizations, and associations representing superintendents, principals, school boards, or teachers in specific academic disciplines. a Guidelines Section 4. SBM Self-Assessment Process Public elementary and secondary schools should conduct SBM self-assessment and shall be the basis of their report of SBM level of practice, however, subject to external validation. ‘The conduct of SBM self-assessment shall cover Kindergarten to Grade six (6) for elementary level while Grade seven (7) to Grade 12 for secondary level or Grades 11 and 12 for standalone Senior High Schools. For SY 2020-2021, self-assessment shall cover documents and MOVs for the last 3 years (2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020), consistent with the period covered in computing for the improvement of learning outcomes. ‘The SBM assessment tool with contextualized MOVs enhanced by the Regional Office shall be used to gather and analyze data using the Documentary, Observation, and Discussion (DOD) process. The result of the self-assessment conducted using other locally made SBM assessment tools shall not be recognized. Purpose of Self-Assessment: SBM Self-Assessment is conducted by the school to determine the depth of its SBM practices alongside the principles of ACCESs. It is, also conducted by the Division to determine the profile of its schools; to identify issues, challenges, and gaps that need immediate intervention and technical assistance, and which needs recognition for good practice for benchmarking by other schools. To unify activities related to SBM among the SDO, refer to Enclosure 5. Basic Steps in Self- Assessment Process (School) STEP 1. Organize a School SBM Coordinating Team (SSCT) of at least 10 members composed of faculty, students, and external stakeholders. From the SSCT, organize 5 sub-teams. Each sub-team shall be assigned to assess one of the four principles of SBM, including the improvement of learning outcomes (60% part of the tool). Let the team members select a leader, and the secretary and the rest shall assess the MOVs using the RACCS principle. In the light of a national health crisis, the representation of students in each team is not required. Existing IATF and health protocols must be strictly complied with and observed. STEP 2. In the pre-assessment meeting, decide whether to use the whole or part method. In the whole method, all team members shall work as a group, to assess one principle after another. In the part method, sub-teams shall be assigned to every principle. The team leaders shall act as coordinators and facilitators while the secretary acts as documenters. The team should study the SBM Assessment tool with contextualized MOVs, especially the DOD Process. STEP 3. Self-Assessment During the self-assessment proper, have a schedule of activities for documentary analysis (1 day), observation analysis (1 day), and discussion of data (1/2 day). All the MOVs for each indicator per the principle of SBM must conform with the RACCS principle to obtain a score. In case the MOVs in each indicator for levels II and III are incomplete, the school will not qualify to obtain a score on the level being desired. Thus, to get the score on the next lower SBM level, the school must completely satisfy all the MOVs of the indicator on the said level. Further, the SSCT shall note all the lacking documents, artifacts, processes, and practices using the Assessment Tool. STEP 4. Conduct process validation, by gathering evidence to validate documents and practices, using observation. STEP 5. Discussion of Documents and Process Evidence. Summarize the evidence for each principle/indicator. Clarify issues, gaps, problems, opportunities, etc. arrive at a consensus, what rating to give in each indicator based on the documented evidence. STEP 6. The sub-team shall discuss to finalize the score in each indicator/ principle. Afterward, the team shall convene for the final SBM self-assessment score/result. STEP 7. Post SBM Self-Assessment Meeting, ‘The SSCT shall facilitate the conduct of the Post SBM Self-Assessment Meeting. STEP 8. Report Writing. ‘The SSCT shall prepare the report on the conduct of SBM Self-Assessment. This report must be forwarded to the District Office. Section 5. Submission of Self-Assessment Results Results of the SBM self-assessment shall be submitted to the District Office. The District Office thru the Public School District Supervisor (PSDS) shall consolidate and endorse all the SBM Self-Assessment Results (Levels I, Il, and Ill) to the SDO. Section 6. Validation Procedure Schools with SBM Levels I, II, and Ill in the self-assessment are subject to external validation by the Division and/or the Region. The table below shows the external validator of the claims of the school. ‘SBM Level Who will validate? Level 1 Division SBM Coordinating Team Level 2 Division SBM Coordinating Team Level 3 Regional SBM Coordinating Team ‘The on-site validation shall be done after the self-assessment was conducted. The validation process involves rigorous analysis of the evidence supporting the claim. If the school’s report claims the attainment of SBM level Il, then, the RSCT shall 6 validate to establish the claim. If the claim is on the achievement of cither SBM levels I or I, then the DSCT shall conduct the validation, however, it is encouraged that representative/s from the Regional Office be invited to monitor the said validation. During validation, proper courtesies must be accorded to the SDO and the School Heads by the RSCT and DSCT, respectively. To guide the RSCT and the DSCT in the process, refer to the attached indicative school program to be followed during SBM Validation. See Enclosure 5. In the light of the Covid-19 pandemic, if after careful consideration, the face- to-face validation process not feasible, virtual SBM Validation can be conducted. In this case, the school has to scan all the MOVs and evidence required in every principle. Provision of photos and videos will also be required to validate the existence of facilities, tools, equipment, and the likes. ‘The purpose of validation is to verify the documented evidence being required in each principle to determine a school’s SBM level of practice. The DOD is a means of evaluating the validity or truthfulness of the evidence. Below are the steps: . Conduct Documentary Analysis. Obtain and assemble all existing artifacts related to the indicator being assessed. Artifacts are the things used by the school community to achieve educational goals, ¢.g., lesson plans, annual reports, assessment tools, test results, community learning centers, computers, organizational charts, developmental plans, things made by the learners, and the like. Evaluate the validity and truthfulness of each artifact against the RACCS criteria namely: RELEVANCE — The evidence must be appropriate to the indicators being assessed. It is appropriate if the artifacts or documents are a tool or product of practice expressed in the indicator. ACCURACY The evidence must be correct. If it is a lesson plan, then both the content and procedure must be correct. CURRENCY The evidence must be present, existing, or actual. CONSISTENCY The evidence must be verifiable and generates the same results from most of the sources. SUFFICIENCY The evidence must be adequate or enough if a student learning portfolio is presented as evidence of self-directed learning, its presence in only two or three classes is not adequate evidence of school-wide implementation. . Conduct observation to obtain process evidence. Documentary evidence may show the school’s focus on learner-centered learning like cooperative, interactive, problem solving, and decision making. There is a need to obtain process evidence to know if these are being practiced. Process evidence is obtained by scrutinizing instructional leadership and management styles, method, techniques, approaches, and activities used by the ‘school community to achieve the SBM goal. Evidence is identified through participant or non-participant observation which may be conducted formally and 7 informally. Individual or group interviews can be held to verify or clarify the evidence. Evidence is scrutinized for validity using RACCS criteria. Use the process evidence to cross-validate documentary evidence. Synthesize the process evidence for group discussion. Synthesize the documentary and process evidence. Conduct the discussion as a friendly non-confrontational conversation to explain, verify, clarify and augment the evidence. Invite members of the school community who were engaged in the collection and presentation of evidence to participate in the discussion. Practices vary in establishing the level of practice of an indicator. The most common. is the integrative approach in which the entire body of evidence for all indicators of a standard is assembled first, scrutinized for internal consistency, and finally used as a guide in making a consensual decision to which level of practice an indicator belongs. ‘The other practice is non-integrative. Indicators of standards are scrutinized one- by-one for evidence and also classified one-by-one for the level of practice. Relationships among indicators are given less attention. Who conducts the DOD? ‘The SSCT conducts the DOD during the SBM self-assessment. Meanwhile, the DSCT and RSCT facilitate the DOD during the validation process. ‘Who constitutes SCT? A leader assisted by a secretary heads the Team. Five sub- teams composed of at least 2 members will be assigned to assess each of the four (4) principles including the improvement of learning outcome. While the validation process is ongoing, the DSCT/RSCT Team Leader must interview the school head. Refer to Enclosure 3 for the SBM Assessment and Interview Guide. Section 7. Submission of Validation Results ‘The DSCT/ RSCT must submit the results one (1) week after the conduct of SBM validation. The DSCT must submit the result of the validation of SBM Levels I and II to the Division SBM Coordinator for consolidation and the approval of the Schools Division Superintendent. Likewise, the SDO shall submit to the Regional Office the list of schools with validated results of SBM Levels I and II for records and reference purposes. Refer to Enclosure 7 for the template. (On the other hand, the FTAD of the Regional Office shall consolidate the validated result of schools with SBM Level Ill of Practice from the RSCT. ‘The SBM assessment and validation findings for levels 1 and 2 shall be analyzed by the DTACT and RFTACTs for level 3 to design and plan for possible intervention and technical assistance. The identified gaps must be addressed to ensure compliance with all MOVs in the next assessment. 8 Section 8. The SBM Assessment Tool The Enhanced School-Based Management (SBM) Assessment Tool with Contextualized Means of Verifications (MOVs) is guided by the four principles of ACCES’s (A Child-and Community-centered Educational Systems). The indicators of SBM practice are contextualized on the ideals of ACCESs school system. The unit of analysis is the school system which is classified as developing, maturing, and advanced, ‘The SBM practice is ascertained by the existence of structured mechanisms, processes, and practices in all indicators. The SBM Coordinating Team from the district, division, region, and central office validate the school's SBM self- assessment result before a level of practice are established. ‘The Enhanced SBM Assessment Tool with contextualized MOVs is attached as Enclosure 2 and can be downloaded at bit.ly/esbmat3.. Description of SBM Levels of Practice ‘The resulting levels are described as follows: LEVEL I: DEVELOPING - Developing structures and mechanisms with acceptable level and extent of community participation and impact on the learning outcomes. LEVEL I: MATURING - Introducing and sustaining a continuous improvement process that integrates wider community participation and improves significantly performance and learning outcomes. LEVEL Ill: ADVANCED (ACCREDITED LEVEL) - Ensuring the production of intended outputs/outcomes and meeting all standards of a system fully integrated into the local community and is self-renewing and self-sustaining. Section 9. Certification and Recognition of SBM Level of Practice Schools with validated SBM levels of practice shall be issued with a certificate of recognition. Further, the certificate must include the validity of the certification. Refer to enclosure 8. Below are the concerned Offices responsible for the issuance of the said certificate. ‘SBM Level ‘Who will issue a Certificate of Recognition? Level 1 Division Office Level 2 Division Office Level 3 ‘Regional Office To further intensify the implementation of SBM, a system of recognition will be established at the Division and Regional levels. Awarding may be done during the Annual Convergence of SBM Implementers, where best practices on the implementation of the four (4) principles of SBM can be showcased or in other appropriate forums. Said recognition shall be given at the last quarter of the year both the Division and Regional levels. Special awards shall also be given but not limited to the enumerated awards below: Division Level Regional Level Most Outstanding School SBM|Most Outstanding Division SBM Coordinator of the Year Coordinator of the Year Best school SBM Impiementer of | Best SBM Implementer of the Year (SDO the Year (Elementary and | Category) Secondary levels) Best SBM Implementer of the Year| SDO with the most number (in = School Head Category | percentage) of SBM Level II of Practice (Elementary and Secondary levels) ‘School with Best SBM Center| Most Responsive RFTACT (Elementary and Secondary levels) ‘Most Responsive DTACT. ‘The SDOs shall contextualize the criteria and awards to be given at the Division Level. Section 10. Validity and Transitory Provision To ensure the sustainability of SBM practices among the schools, established and validated SBM levels 1, 2, and 3 is only valid for 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively from the date of approval of the Schools Division Superintendent or the Regional Director. Thus, schools with validated SBM practice shall conduct self-assessment before its validity period ends. Schools with SBM level 1 shall conduct self- assessment after a year, schools with SBM level 2 after 2 years, and schools with SBM level 3 after 3 years. However, schools with SBM level 2 may decide to level up their SBM practice after a year, provided that the school conducts self-assessment and submits the result to the District Office. The PSDS shall recommend the said school to the SDO for initial validation. The SDO shall endorse the school to the RO for validation. Miscellaneous Provision Section 11. Repealing Clause Provisions contained in previous Regional issuances inconsistent with this Memorandum are hereby repealed. Section 12. Effectivity ‘This Regional Memorandum shall take effect immediately upon issuance. Enclosure 2 to Regional Memorandum No. 24 _ s. 2021 SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT (SBM) ASSESSMENT TOOL WITH CONTEXTUALIZED MEANS OF VERIFICATIONS (MOVs) Introduction ‘The School-Based Management (SBM) Assessment Tool with Contextualized Means of Verifications (MOVs) is guided by the four principles of ACCES’s (A Child and Community-Centered Educational Systems). The indicators of SBM practice are contextualized on the ideals of ACCESs school system. The unit of analysis is the school system which is classified as developing, maturing, and advanced. The SBM practice is ascertained by the existence of structured mechanisms, processes, and practices in all indicators. An SBM Coordinating Team from the school, district, division, and region validates the school's SBM self-assessment result before a level of practice is established. Objectives This tool aims to determine the SBM level of practice of the schools in the seven Schools Division of the MIMAROPA region. This tool will be used by the following: . School Heads - for self-assessment on the SBM level of practice. 2, Schoole Division Office. specifically the DTACTs and the DSCT for monitoring the implementation of SBM and determining the intensity of SBM practice of the schools for the provision of technical assistance, and for validation purposes of the schools SBM levels of practice. 3. Regional Office- specifically the RFTACTs and the RSCT for validating the SBM Level of Practice of the Schools and for the provision of technical assistance. Instruction to the Users Indicate the extent of SBM practice for each indicator based on the MOVs presented by the school and after systematic D-O-D (Document. Analysis-Observation-Discussion). To establish the SBM level of practice of a school, put a check (/) mark under the evident column if the MOVs are satisfactorily provided. On the other hand, MOVs such as documents/artifacts are not presented or lacking/incomplete, place a check (/) mark under the non-evident column and specify the discrepancy /ies under remarks. uw School Profile ‘A, Number of Enrolment for SY. ~ ELEMENTARY __ JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Grade Level_| Male | Female | Total | Grade Level | Male | Female | Total | Grade Level | Male | Female | Total Kindergarten Vi S x a Es L var SCT id x, io x a = Vv VI Total B. Number of Personnel Teachi ___Non-Teaci [_ToTAL Level ‘Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | ‘Elementary Junior HS EN emer [Senior HS 1 C. List of Stakeholders (Attach addition sheet) ‘The development plan is enhanced with the T, Approved Enhanced SIP 2. Approved AIP 3. Approved SLCP. = 4. Areceived copy of the letter of intent from of erating the SIP ‘ratting the SIP the stakeholders to enhance the SIP. 5. A received copy of the invitation letter | 5.A received copy of the invitation letter sent | S.Documentation/Minutes of the ‘sent to the community stakeholders to the community stakeholders meetings with photos and videos i@ | The school leads the regular review and | The improvement of the developmental plan. | working aa full partners lead the continual | review and improvement process; the school Felevant to emerging needs, challenges plan. land opportunities. Tr Memorandum to the School Planning [I Memorandum to the School Planning | 1 Memorandum to the School Planning ‘Team to conduct mid-year and year-end | Team to conduct mid-year and year-end | Team to conduct mid-year and year-end teen OIF an AP an SCP review of BSIP, AIP, and SLCP review of BSIP, AIP, and SLCP oo 2, Summary of findings, recommendations | 2. Summary of findings, recommendations, See ea aa svat findings, | “and. suggested. SIP, AIP, and SUCP | and suggested SIP, AIP, and” SLCP Roper atts a, agsimeia fo improve the ans ‘edjustmente to improve the plans the plans. aie year ‘year-end project | 3. Mid-year and. year-end. project 3. Mid-year and year-end project monitoring mentering reports monitoring reports 4, Copy of BSP, Ai, and SLCP reviewed by | 4. Copy of BP, AP, and SUCP reviewed by Feaponsbiies of the stakeholders, 1. Kn approved copy ofthe school existing | An approved coy ofthe sche exiting onal structures is available: | organizational structures jo available: ‘School Governing Council (S60) ~~ School Governing Council SEG) 7 School Governing Council SEO) = Parente-Teachers Association (PTA) = Parents-Teachers Association (PTA) | - _Parents-Teachers Association (PTA) = School-Community Planning Team | - _School-Community Planning Team. = School-Community Planning Team leaders addressing a particular choo! problem. T, The curriculum provides for the Devebbping structures are. in place and analysis of the competency and development feeds f leaders is conducted: te result ised. to develop @ long-term training and development program. ‘Leaders undertake training modes that are convenient to them (on-line, off-line, ‘modular, group, or home-based) and which do aot’ disrupt thelr regular functions 3. Approred Staff Profesional Development Plan based on the TNA ‘All types of learners of the school community fare Kentified, their earning curves assessed; appropriate ‘programs with its support materials for each type of learner are developed. 5. Training completion reports with photos | 5. are available 6, M&KE reports on the conducted training, capacity building, SLAC, INSET, and others are available Programs ere filly implemented end closely monitored address performance iscrepanetca, beacheasrk’ beet practices, coach’ low performers, mentor potential Teaders, reward high’ achievement and | st maintain an environment that makes learning meaningful and enjoyable. a. = ; capacity building, SLAC, INSET, and ‘Where applicable oniy: 1, Bnrolment data by type of learners Special Interest Pepram ~Behoal Readiness Year-end F Supporting document for School {Photos and videos of benchmarking MFAT (SPED) fas Program Invitation, List of Awardees, Certificate of recognition ° RLLNA Sample Certificates, and photos 4. Documentation for the conduct of write © Child-Friendly School Survey (SPSS) | 5. Supervisory Plan and report are available | "shops for learning materials and training, ‘file of Summative Tests with TOS | 6. Documented ‘teaching and learning | in updating teacher competencies on 3. Report on the Analysis of the activities provided curriculum and pedagogy ‘Astensment Result 7. Class observation report 5. Contextualized intervention programs PHIL-IRT 8. Copy of curriculum guide 6. Contextualized Modules Localization guidelines are agreed’ to by | directly improves community life. Ineffective | as a learning laboratory and the acheol as an the echool community and teachers | approaches are replaced and innovative ones | agent of change for the improvement of the are properly oriented. are developed, community. Ty Basuipentation report ine conduct of [T. AT Teast one daly esonTg/ weekly Rome |. Docuentation thatthe school Baa Been workshop to localize the curriculum learning plan per teacher per quarter, per | benchmarked on their best practices in 2, Compilation ator ofthe folowing subject, per grade/year level integrating | localizing the curriculum ‘3. A vepresentative group of achool [A representative team of school and | Learning materiale and approaches to | Materials and approaches are being weed In ‘and. community, stakeholders | community stakeholders assesses content | reinforce strengths and address deficiencies | school, inthe family, and in the community develop the methods and materials | and methods used in teaching creative, | are developed and tested for applicability on | to develop the critical, creative thinking, and {or developing ereative thinking and | critical thinking, and problem-solving. | echool, family, end community. problem-solving community of learners and problem-solving. ‘Assessment results are used as a guide to fre producing desired results, develop materials, 1. Composition of School Project Team | 1. Copy of developed learning resources | 1. Inventory of developed/enhanced (ewith TOR intended forthe least’ mastered |" learning resources 2. Assessment tools for assessing the content | competencies 2. Inventory of innovations in the teaching ‘and methods used in teaching creative, | 2. Evaluation and validation results of the |" and learning process critical thinking, and problem-solving developed learning resources 3. Certification that the ‘3. Copy of professional development pla 3. Reports on remedial/ enhancement/ | developed/enhanced learning resourc 4, Copy of PPAs on curriculum reinforcement’ initiatives/catch-up | and innovations in the teaching and 5. List of interventions and implemented | _ mechanism with photos learning process were adopted/ utilized ‘program 0 address the learners need 4. Copy of monitoring tools in the conduct | i school, family and community 6. Copy of report on child mapping assessment on interventions | 4. Monitoring results showing the ‘conducted eee ‘attainment of expected outputs 1-Copy of reporon SPED or ALS Program. if| 5. Developmental needs pan for theverse | 8. Documentation |” Report of the applicable Interventions and innovations conducted ed pe etc eee geen ft cert eee eal | ENC see oe och pea ot learning evaluation learners 7. LAC sessions plans and report focused | 7. Copy of mentoring and coaching fon the teaching and learning process program / activities 8. Copy of action plan per learning/ subject | 8. Action research on the impact of area Interventions programs eae ees See oe ee or a : it r “The school-based monitoring and learning | The monitoring system is accepted and and | systems generate feedback that is used for | regularly used for collective decision-making. i making decisions thet enhance the total © st development of learners, ‘The monitoring toot has been improved to nt s sa it provide both quantitative and qualitative data, ol & ‘A committee takes care of the continuous improvement ofthe tool. T. All report cards are signed by the parents /guardian 2. Copy ‘of rubrics for differentiated instruction 3, Portfolio assessment in all subject areas T, Documentation of school monitoring and | 1, Documentation of school monitoring and | I. Updated Electronic School Report Card assemblies ascemblies (ESRC) with proof of dissemination to the 2. Suggestion box 2. Summary of feedbacks from the | stakeholders 3. Redback form for parents and learners ‘suggestion box, feedbacks from parents | 2. Copy of rubrics for differentiated 44. Evidence ofthe conduct ofthe State ofthe | and learners with actions taken. instruction ‘School Address (505A) 9. Bvidence of the conduct of the State of | 3. Documented partnership activities on ~The message of the School Head the School Address (SOSA) Improving assessment design Program Invitation ‘The message of the School Head Proof of networking activities with the Received letter of invitation to Program Invitation takeholders on the improvement of the stakeholders Received letter of invitation to the | school facilites Photo documentation stakeholders 5. Copy of classroom observation tool Photo documentation with video 5. Appropriate ‘ssessment tools for |The astessment tools are reviewed by the |The assesment toot are reviewed by the | School suresement renale are used to isp an wnt iSoce cen i SS ee ee ee a ee eee ee ee ee ae eae same ol rep oe, ts a ETO cress meen on | 2. REREETa etn ge cay at| 2 RETA et aya Bab oscuro | 2. Eo, of mean of wo 2 ee etn or site fk er of | nme eg dco | nem ebro en the stakeholders: FGD/Mectings conducted conducted dae caccn ee nnooens | 9 elma ccs ye | ton tyes period, per subject area ‘schoo! 4 Buidence where assessment results are ‘centered principles of education in the design | community-driven, inclusive, and adherent ‘of support to education. to childs rights and protection requirements, | Learning managers and facilitators apply the | Learning facilitators observe learners? rights irs’ | principles in designing learning materials, | designing the curriculum to structuring the ‘hole learning environment. ‘usymigg/ woumsney Jo wonwuteog -s Ti09/e0s souyping feueR=uN “+ reusiop soueping /sojeeun0D sepep |p tortineg “e oon 249 uj puuosiod Kiysno98 Jo uoneuBieed “c upesqy/ weeiqyy jo uopeuieod °s ilieo/toos souepmp euoRaUM > 2yeu3s9p ees ‘wouBiead “e Tooy>e op my pouoesed fpmooe je waned sopeeuno9, sump st femecn ga san_p SORES *L ‘Ow15/Arexqr1/AresqrT-TuyW TwuoRUNS ‘yeus=9p ueuesgy/ ueuerqry Jo _uopwuRtsog “oUio9/umoos sduepMp [PuoRoUN ‘yeusis9p sopeunes aotrepinp /2ojeeunog souspmp, e ‘won wuIs9q tae pe ‘ye posauao-s9uze9| BunBysop © "| wr ovis jo soioud wn uoneweunood “9 9 | Gayo speou am sseuppe eq sonmoed s aiqeteay °s | (Gat) Aqestp yu SsoUs89] JO eplODem y som Joon seouesonsn ooton AIDSOI-PIND “T | 100) Peace ae opmuocor ss-ou0 Sue JO Stee ‘wssouoo patties woRDsioad rnp vo wosioid!Goospe oss Joo) waUBEDEEY foouDe AUN DRY “tL ‘sjo8 pus woes “uojsia guonerueio sxpouonns (vans) womnsntoy ‘pancrmos 2p tio joouss 243 4 ssoplodoqers Arunaao9 axp 0} yooyss ax | um PUY HORNA “BILONUON -aonve arerdosdde ‘Poufooos wontuioses pub epreaw Jo 1sr1 “1 | Aq tans onudooar pus spreae Jo ieFT “1 | foots Jo ronpuoo ax jo souapma “I | won pastaippe ai sdva ~pasnead Batag S00 wave ‘tusiate Agiquiumose soueaeyrod aanuaour poe ‘uoRuooss “Afuqmuno.se saxon poy yootpe Woy Butajons tp1a1 jogos aun | padoyaxop Ajaareiogeneo #0 paRea, souwwoyed Paidaop- guna | s woreke Amqeiumoade oroi-Arunwtuod y | yw poonsed st Aymquyunosse aoueuojad | paziuBooo1 8 s1e08 JO WAUDNNV Z [a RT PC ES NOE 3) opines prwoa/ VOR “NOW “> (due 9) 120 Pauines/papuaKte Paxoidde pu WORD TRUFRLD Jo 5409 “€ od Rumy pus _wonsrpossy 81549091, ‘uonenossy pus eqaamajo snejniq pue donning -z | puny pus woREposey sia4oeal ‘vonwpossy mummy | puR siuamg Jo saBj-f4 paw WORIREICS “Z ooyos a1n jo aed smonsydsuoo | aun jo sapyanoe Burueo} ax wt yuouiseBua 1 ur saueyD ‘suaEnI> parsed puw kdoo'z | sauered uo sooyd Yum WoNsuoMNIoG ~% somnpour _onioe tH Guonsae=is) jeouos “amoy axp 1 yuapIAS Bf SINEaNO ,S70U.H] paicanp-yas peysiduoooe Jo onopuod “< pesompsiee Fudoqasap ye “su uF S21ARD® aL ‘Ssonseid i909 0 wonepdios pare Gowanuy +1 | suo: Krovwioqet UL / daa euoRoUNa"T | -IUapms jo soo YK wORKIUOUINIOG “T “Spuvitap 1waR Duy (03 jumaayas y four 0) pasoudust sIsnonuryu0> ‘raquo nq poumoneuren "ey umiloid 24j,| “sioure3j pansap ssonpord x amp auneuo | soy) 40} ajquiunosze pure sjqisuodsar | -Fujuswey own 405 pus AqqEUNoIoE 0 siuozed pure erauae>) Aq. pasontiou: puw | are own sususea, sonposd oy podojusp | pus Aypgisuodsa1 oumnsse seroureny payaanp | powouryduay Afaniwsogetioo 8! ureldosd Sq, | pure pouaisap are eureoid “Aujureay | 01 sonqea pul “sfIDYs “=8peqMoUy -me8 _jo__yuourdoronp ony AtenuNDD Tenusss> yyy padeba ame ss5ureo7 oo) yuowssosse Aqiquunoa9® payaso at joo pus wus Lup suapjoyayyns ot ORBUTUIOSSIP Jo Jooid "b | 1uUISSasse KmEGMUNODDS Jo AOD PAIL > “oo. “oo, poe wus josumnseee “mrammEe soneaueyer Aygqenmo.oe ue sovmmonse ‘sropjoums | yoeqpee) soo) poe eum je wonedionsed uy unim pours ou | wuouisoese —AmIgEnoy “+ fous poe qeusyy Suro juounsnpy [moyao! souwmioysod jo weds tenuuy'z | dIV 29) sieeq © se sSupuy TOW POR 'C OL ‘PIONS 3H NOL Wise siopouanns jue pus "| yum eiopoYoeNe feusas puw yout! | 01 OY Jo YoRMURUOND pue UorNhuDEaNd reurayut eserinamco “SBN pore “1 | Susjosur eoonrWuo JR PeatuNiig | | yo ToNpuOD ot UO Yoda! vOHeIUoWNI0G "L -nopouorne 2 oy sanopins | pow smeie iousirore -warete juouenoese Amenen0o98 a au jo sojoud Yim voneuoumseg “¢| an jo soioud wu voneOUNo0G “Z. SFunaoyt Jo SMUT ‘tin sfaypay jo anurans ot joo pon“ ‘mo}iou Due yuowesaese ootremLo}Iod oqpouad a) #uunp _uopmuauinop croyd mye Bunsow oy Jo. saInENA“e maou pure yuowesaese 2oureuopied 1 | 21 wonmisur yo xana] paataoos aun Jo Ado "1 | oy wont jo Jona| ponsoas 2u 30 6403 “1 pope Jo Sonya an pawn | Tuam om Mo NPE “c aun D Puwquowssosse souvuuoHod | eroud yum Sunaou ayy Jo SAMUI “e ‘Mojias puw uoussossy eouwuuoLiod | pue wuowesasr souwuuosiod 2ipotod orpouad jo ioriptos amp ui suapiouanms ay | Jo jonpuoo ap UI siepOUEES on ype pus | wo & ‘wuDypo yuousossy Amigeyuno.98 pouyar Paw panowat op yo leo panty es | pio eyo yuouresease Aymgrnesce oh syngnvunooo pouenesonne jo 00 pons | Jo soutapre Sunuounday Joao ponds ERUERRRTTUT HSUT BOISE ———~ FSIS PU SITE] FO AIOTUSAT ——] an uy awdinied 0} sroppoysyme on “Suynorios sso qone 03 torres Jo Sava paaiooas au Jo Ado “1 | oxy e240 woysKs yuousseueN somnoF=s HL ssyuoumsop tupaoney tf Jo Kdog.“t -cursyefe yuowfouvur sounosas ‘rappoyssers 2x9 Jo Siomantoq sterilordde sp yuauadojanap aanesoqurfoo otf ut aenodx> ‘soomosos jo 2en aanoay pure | soxtsp yorn wove juowafetreW 2omosa 2 2 ‘oqwudoadde ‘snoprpnt poddne sssproqayers | pedofarsp-Arenaros w st 200d ul “ tawid wonvonpe aun Samoeos uy umd tewonwonpe we. ‘vid woneanps ay yo wonuuoydut 242 ‘gid uoponpa atp jo woneyuaw2ydat [pur ‘Sujuumediond ooimosas puv Buuuvjd | ox) pue “Furwuresed | aomnosai Sin uy sivdiopzed or exopfoomere. at | ut ued feuoneonps we Jo waudojaKp “¢| © woneynur yo son91 poarooos ox Jo Adop'z | 9m UI siedionmd oy siopioysmms om ‘ueld a ie me) moo | OMY OXI cee mae eeeteremes -— |lacaat taunt es eee ‘eueyd uoneonpe Kumar0> Je yonpaos om ar woniwounooa “t | 39 peealoosé_puw stoneund jo" oor | yo psaq_/joosd se suowTeved Jo yood t | somonss soy sing w ev s2pIaeS @ Pa TEE a TP aT Sresppegame cr eopetooeo neon Je CORR TESUTST_ PUP TUSERIOTSISP Sy ‘uy uoedtoned purr yuSHIDAIOAGT SSK Ut sropoyaere 01 uopiuH0291 Jo a1EUTI0 2 Tuousdeueu jeree oouse _- | reuiayeu pareyomd jo suoumna0p TOR/VON 8 paras ae SapameSpaRT pus yususae yo. ynsas/sood ‘diqesoinsed wo NOW/VOI saymsatzad e20snoeas Jo SPuosoy [poyerous8 soamosas Jo sp10024 supploue sxspouarrs | __ sain satu) up Aq porwnmar egor pue soalsp pung Z| 2 a powenMT gor pue sastup pung-z | vo sovoYd wm yodas UoRPiHoKMIOG somosar om jo wonsiuowo(dun 24) ut sed poneap) ap Bupsoak ot wid DORIV “6 2 uO sdeB om uy aU JO Hsu “2 af ws ‘emosa1 uo soeios0id Sunuoda: pus | 2omosor uo soseooosd Sunuoda: pur uoursSoueus somosar uo s2esa9030 ‘conenmeso Fuosrwow jo uoRmUsMD;dt | ‘uoReRTeAD “BouoyoU yo woRUSNI|MuT | RunOdar puw ‘uonEnfess ‘SusoHWOU! euoneprres plre qUoUISsosse Was J0j fooyDs Mok BupSa!qns ur asodind amok st 3eUM “C esquedionsed oxp asom oym pue 1 ‘ayep ayy ayeorpur pue wey} aresaUMUT gas 03 aanejar Guanoe Suping Ayoede9 /uoreuaHO UorsIAIC & papuane Nok envy quourssossy /uopjeyuoro[dusy MES “a ejooqos mof Jo seomnos Suypuny 9470 943 ese FBqm “FOOW [CONS Woy opIsy “VY “aps sup ur poyes ou suonsonb jeuontppe ASE 0} PAMOTE S| TL 24L “\LVINES®) [00] JuaUISsassy WES IuONDeIe peyuLd ayy 0) JUSUTYORNE UL S} WO} STYL “urea SUNCUIPIOCD WAS OU PUP OAS ey} Jo (TL) 19peaT uray, 9473 Aq poystiduroose oq pure posn og yeys opin merasoyul UoREPITEA WES SILL swoRSRASUT wu0g/epmy Mo1AtqU] MOREPHEA WAS 1202 8 —ZE “ON umpussousyy reuoday 01 ¢ amsojoug a etopMuoMaTdwm] WAS Jo suII03 Uy SoDROVIY 39g S,JOo4S MOL ore OHM “C equouonsryoe quopnys pure souemsojrod Jooyos saordury 0} soySayex98 mnOK oFe EUM “D 4 104 aredard 0 op nok Tus ey cuoREpHEA/usWSsassy WAS IxU ay} Jo MWaA JaBEY MOA S| TOUM °6 gop 0} Surmreyd noé axe suonoe wouA euoUISsasse “198 WAS exp Jo ONpUCD ot Jaye pue SuLMp suonEzter Mos arom UM “9 oz sovepHeA OY/OUS +hq posedosa ow/oas ous wos popoon VL spoon AH0HE eH sofusqreug pue suratqora: ‘surooU0D puv sons] “

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy