Mod Geo - Lesson 2
Mod Geo - Lesson 2
Finite geometry from the name implies, the number of points in a line is defined and
not only regarded as a straight line. Curve lines may be considered to form a line. Unlike in
Euclidean geometry that lines can be extended infinitely since it composed of infinitely many
points, the finite geometry did not consist of parallel lines. Also, intersecting lines may not be
claimed based on the illustration itself unless stated that there exists a common point
between them.
Lesson Objectives:
Getting Started:
In a paragraph no more than 50 words, give some ideas from the past that reflect
what Euclidean geometry is all about then compare its difference to your first notions when
you heard the word finite geometry.
Discussion:
Finite geometry is a geometry with a finite number of points. When confined to a plane,
all finite geometries are either projective plane geometries (with no parallel lines) or affine
plane geometries (with parallel lines).
Gino Fano (1871–1952) is credited with being the first person to explore finite geometries
beginning in 1892. He worked primarily in projective and algebraic geometry. He was born in
1871 in Mantua, Italy. He initially studied in Turin. Later, he moved to Göttingen and worked
with Felix Klein. Fano served as a professor of mathematics in Turin until he was forced to leave
during World War II. He also taught in Switzerland and the United States. He died in Verona,
Italy in 1952.
Fanos’s ideas can be traced back going back to von Staudt (1852) where there are two
undefined terms: points, lines. There is also a relation between them called on. This relationship
is symmetric so we speak of points being on lines and lines being on points. (Hilbert, 2000)
The following are some of the known finite geometries with its corresponding axiom set,
theorems, and components: (Klein, 1952)
a. Find a model:
It is where Axiom 3P-1 is false since there are four points in the model well in fact it should
only be exactly three.
Axiom 2 is false since, points A and B are on two distinct lines l and m.
Axiom 3P-3 fails to hold since all points are on the same line while Axiom 3P-4 still
holds since it is vacuously true.
Since not all duals can be found in the axiom set, hence the three-point geometry
does not follow the principle of duality, since the Dual of Axiom 3 is not existing explicitly in
the Axiom set.
a. Find a model:
Axiom 4L-1 is false since there are only three lines in the geometry, while
the rest of the two axioms hold.
Axiom 4L-3 fails to hold since the point lies in the four lines but not exactly
on 2 lines, while axiom 4L-2 holds for every 2 lines, there is exactly one point in
both of them.
Since the duals of each axiom cannot be found in the axiom set, the Four-Line
Geometry does not follow the principle of duality.
Although the four-line geometry does not follow the principle of duality, the four-point
geometry is the plane duals of the axioms for the four-line geometry which will give the axioms
for the four-point geometry. And the plane duals of Theorems 2.3 and 2.4 will give valid
theorems in the four-point geometry.
Axiom 4P-1 fails to hold since there are only three points in the model, where
axioms 4P-2 and 4P-3 both hold.
ii. Show the independence of Axiom 4P-2 (if exists) (Application No. 4)
Axiom 4P-3 fails to hold since the line l3 has three points on it.
Theorem F-1: Each two lines have exactly one point in common.
Theorem F-2: Fano's geometry consists of exactly seven points.
Theorem F-3: Each point on Fano’s geometry is incident with exactly three lines.
Theorem F-4: Fano’s geometry consists of exactly seven lines.
In diagram model 4, points are defined by the seven dots and lines by the six straight
segments and one curved segment. Note each line contains exactly three points.
Now, create another (a Model illustrated through a table) that is isomorphic to Fano’s
Model. (Application No.5)
Let p and q be any two distinct lines. By Axiom F-5, there is a point A incident to
both p and q. Suppose there is a second point B, distinct from A, incident to both p
and q. Then by Axiom F-4, p and q are the same lines, but this contradicts that p and q
are distinct lines. Thus p and q intersect in exactly one-point A. Therefore, two distinct
lines intersect in exactly one point. ∎
By Axiom F-1, there exists a line l. Then by Axiom F-2, there exist exactly three points
A, B, C on line l. Now by Axiom F-3, there exists a point P, not on line l. Hence we have
at least four distinct points A, B, C, and P. By Axiom F-4 and since P is not on line l, there
are three distinct lines AP, BP, and CP. And by Axiom F-2, each of these lines contains a
third point D, E, and F on AP, BP, and CP, respectively. None of D, E, or F can be any of
the points A, B, C, or P; for if this was not true, Axiom F-4 would be contradicted. (Write
the details for this argument in Assessment No.3.) Hence there are at least seven distinct
points A, B, C, D, E, F, and P.
We assert that there are exactly seven distinct points. Suppose there exists a distinct
eighth point Q. Note Q is not on l, since A, B, and C are the only points on l. By Axioms F-
4 and F-5, lines PQ and l must intersect at a point R. Since A, B, and C are the only points
on l, R must be one of A, B, or C. Suppose R = A. Since D is on line AP and A = R is on line
PQ, we would have R = A, D, P, and Q collinear which contradicts Axiom F-2. The other
cases for B or C are similar. Hence there are exactly seven distinct points. ∎
A model where Axioms F-2 through and Axiom F-5 are true, but Axiom F-1 is not true.
Consider a model with no points and no lines. The model satisfies all the remaining four axioms
vacuously. But, since there are no lines, Axiom F-1 is not true.
ii. Show the independence of Axiom F-2 (if exists)
It is a model where Axiom F-2 fails to hold while the other four axioms are
true. Since every line consists of only 2 points, Axiom F-2 is false.
A model where Axiom F-3 is false since all points are the only incident to
one line, while the other three remaining axioms are true. Axiom F-5 is vacuously
true, it does not require a common point intersecting two lines since there is only
one distinct line in the model.
Axiom F-4 fails to hold since the two distinct points lie became incident to
two lines. While the remaining four axioms are consistently satisfied by the model.
v. Show the independence of Axiom F-5 (if exists)
Axiom F-5 is not independent since, in Axiom F-4, every two points should have a
one-line incident to it in each parallel line that will not exist.
d. Write the dual of each axiom set.
Since not all duals are explicitly defined in Fano’s axiom set, hence Fano’s
geometry does not follow the principle of duality.
Three-Point geometry