SUPERVISED INDUSTRY TRAINING OR ON THE JOB

TRAINING EVALUATION FORM

Dear Trainees:
The following questionnaire is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the
Supervised Industry Training (SIT) or On the Job Training (OJT) you had
with the Industry Partners of Damortis National High School. Please check (
) the appropriate box corresponding to your rating for each question asked.
The results of this evaluation shall serve as a basis for improving the design
and management of the SIT to maximize the benefits of the said Program.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Legend:
5 – Outstanding
4 – Very Good/ Very Satisfactory
3 – Good/Adequate
2 – Fair/ Satisfactory
1 – Poor/Unsatisfactory
NA – not applicable
Item Question Ratings
No.
INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Has PTC Agoo, conducted an orientation
about the SIT/OJT program, the
1
requirements and preparations needed
and its expectations?
Has PTC Agoo, the provided the
necessary assistance such as referrals or
2
recommendations in finding the company
for your OJT?
Has PTC Agoo, showed coordination with
3 the Industry partner in the design and
supervision of your SIT/OJT?
Has your in-school training adequate to
4 undertake Industry partner assignment
and its challenges?
Has PTC Agoo, monitored your progress
5
in the Industry?
Has the supervision been effective in
6 achieving your OJT objectives and
providing feedbacks when necessary?
 Did PTC Agoo, conduct assessment of
7
your SIT/OJT program upon completion?
Were you provided with the results of the
8 Industry and PTC Agoo, assessment of
your OJT?
Comments/Suggestions:

Item Question Ratings

No.
INDUSTRY PARTNER 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Was the Industry partner appropriate
1 for your type of training required
and/or desired?
Has the industry partner designed the
2 training to meet your objectives and
expectations?
Has the industry partner showed
3 coordination with PTC Agoo, in the
design and supervision of the SIT/OJT?
Has the Industry Partner and its staff
4 welcomed you and treated you with
respect and understanding?
Has the industry partner facilitated the
training, including the provision of the
5 necessary resources such as facilities
and equipment needed to achieve your
OJT objectives?
Has the Industry Partner assigned a
6 supervisor to oversee your work or
training?
Was the supervisor effective in
7 supervising you through regular
meetings, consultations and advise?
 Has the training provided you with the
necessary technical and administrative
8
exposure of real world problems and
practices?
Has the training program allowed you
to develop self-confidence, self-
9
motivation and positive attitude
towards work?
Has the experience improved your
10
personal skills and human relations?
Are you satisfied with your training in
11
the Industry?
Comments/Suggestions:

Signature: ________________________
Printed Name: _________________________ Qualification: ___________________
Host Industry Partner:_________________ Supervisor: ______________________
Period of Training: ____________________ Instructor: _______________________
 INTERPRET AND ANALYZE PROGRAM EVALUATION

RATER A
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the X
components of a CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient X
3. Objectives of every training session is well X
explained
4. Expected activities/outputs are clarified X

RATER B
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the X
components of a CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient X
3. Objectives of every training session is well X
explained
4. Expected activities/outputs are clarified X

RATER C
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the X
components of a CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient X
3. Objectives of every training session is well X
explained
4. Expected activities/outputs are clarified X

Average Ratings

PREPARATION Average
1. Workshop layout conforms 5
with the components of a CBT
workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient 5
3. Objectives of every training 4
session is well explained
4. Expected activities/outputs are 4
clarified
Range:

0.00 - 1.49 = Poor/Unsatisfactory

1.50 - 2.49 = Fair/ Adequate

2.50 - 3.49 = Good/Satisfactory

3.50 - 4.49 = Very Good/Very Satisfactory

4.50 - 5.0 = Outstanding

General Interpretation:

The workshop layout of the training has an average of 5

which was Outstanding as accordance to CBT requirements. The
interpretation for the CBLM sufficiency has determined that it is
very clear and satisfied. The explanation from objectives of every
training session has identified as very good and very satisfactory.

The summary evaluation of the expected activities and

outputs were determined as very good and very satisfactory

Recommendation:
Keep up the good work and enhance more from the executions of
program sequence.
 TRAINING SESSION EVALUATION FORM

INSTRUCTIONS:
This post-training evaluation instrument is intended to measure how
satisfactorily your trainer has done his job during the whole duration of
your training. Please give your honest rating by checking on the
corresponding cell of your response. Your answers will be treated with
utmost confidentiality.
TRAINERS/INSTRUCTOR
S
1 2 3 4 5
Name of Trainer:
KENNETH TABIOS
1. Orients trainees about ✓
CBT, the use of CBLM
and the evaluation
system
2. Discusses clearly the ✓
unit of competencies
and outcomes to be
attained at the start of
every module
3. Exhibits mastery of the ✓
subject/course he/she
is teaching
4. Motivates and elicits ✓
active participation
from the students or
trainees
5. Keeps records of ✓
evidence/s of
competency attainment
of each
student/trainees
6. Instill value of safety ✓
and orderliness in the
classrooms and
workshops
7. Instills the value of ✓
teamwork and positive
work values
8. Instills good grooming ✓
and hygiene
9. Instills value of time ✓
10. Quality of voice ✓
while teaching
 11. Clarity of ✓
language/dialect used
in teaching
12. Provides extra ✓
attention to trainees
and students with
specific learning needs
13. Attends classes ✓
regularly and promptly
14. Shows energy and ✓
enthusiasm while
teaching
15. Maximizes use of ✓
training supplies and
materials
16. Dresses ✓
appropriately
17. Shows empathy ✓
18. Demonstrates self- ✓
control
This post-training evaluation instrument is intended to measure how
satisfactorily your trainer prepared and facilitated your training. Please give
your honest rating by checking on the corresponding cell of your response.
Your answers will be treated with utmost confidentiality.
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout ✓
conforms with the
components of a CBT
workshop
2. Number of CBLM is ✓
sufficient
3. Objectives of every ✓
training session is well
explained
4. Expected ✓
activities/outputs are
clarified
DESIGN AND DELIVERY 1 2 3 4 5
1. Course contents are ✓
sufficient to attain
objectives
2. CBLM are logically ✓
organized and
presented
3. Information Sheet are ✓
comprehensive in
 providing the required
knowledge
4. Examples, illustrations ✓
and demonstrations
help you learn
5. Practice exercises like ✓
Task/Job Sheets are
sufficient to learn
required skills
6. Valuable knowledge ✓
are learned through the
contents of the course
7. Training Methodologies ✓
are effective
8. Assessment Methods ✓
and evaluation system
are suitable for the
trainees and the
competency
9. Recording of ✓
achievements and
competencies acquired
is prompt and
comprehensive
10. Feedback about the ✓
performance of learners
are given immediately
TRAINING 1 2 3 4 5
FACILITIES/RESOURCES
1. Training Resources are ✓
adequate
2. Training Venue is ✓
conducive and
appropriate
3. Equipment, Supplies, ✓
and Materials are
Sufficient
4. Equipment, Supplies ✓
and Materials are
suitable and
appropriate
5. Promptness in ✓
providing Supplies and
Materials
SUPPORT STAFF 1 2 3 4 5
1. Support Staff are ✓
accommodating
Comments/Suggestions