0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views4 pages

Case Processing Summary

1) The document analyzes data on 50 subjects' attitudes (SIKAP) and knowledge (PENGETAHUAN) about a health category (GDS KATEGORI). 2) A chi-square test found a significant relationship between SIKAP and GDS KATEGORI, but no significant relationship between PENGETAHUAN and GDS KATEGORI. 3) Subjects with positive SIKAP were over 9 times more likely to be in the "Terkontrol" GDS KATEGORI compared to those with negative SIKAP.

Uploaded by

nurwahyuni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views4 pages

Case Processing Summary

1) The document analyzes data on 50 subjects' attitudes (SIKAP) and knowledge (PENGETAHUAN) about a health category (GDS KATEGORI). 2) A chi-square test found a significant relationship between SIKAP and GDS KATEGORI, but no significant relationship between PENGETAHUAN and GDS KATEGORI. 3) Subjects with positive SIKAP were over 9 times more likely to be in the "Terkontrol" GDS KATEGORI compared to those with negative SIKAP.

Uploaded by

nurwahyuni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

SIKAP * GDS KATEGORI 50 100,0% 0 0,0% 50 100,0%

SIKAP * GDS KATEGORI Crosstabulation

GDS KATEGORI Total

Terkontrol Tidak Terkontrol

Count 34 3 37

Expected Count 30,3 6,7 37,0

% within SIKAP 91,9% 8,1% 100,0%

% within GDS KATEGORI 82,9% 33,3% 74,0%


POSITIF
% of Total 68,0% 6,0% 74,0%

Residual 3,7 -3,7

Std. Residual ,7 -1,4

Adjusted Residual 3,1 -3,1


SIKAP
Count 7 6 13

Expected Count 10,7 2,3 13,0

% within SIKAP 53,8% 46,2% 100,0%

% within GDS KATEGORI 17,1% 66,7% 26,0%


NEGATIF
% of Total 14,0% 12,0% 26,0%
Residual -3,7 3,7

Std. Residual -1,1 2,4

Adjusted Residual -3,1 3,1


Count 41 9 50

Expected Count 41,0 9,0 50,0

Total % within SIKAP 82,0% 18,0% 100,0%

% within GDS KATEGORI 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 82,0% 18,0% 100,0%


Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 9,434 1 ,002
b
Continuity Correction 7,033 1 ,008
Likelihood Ratio 8,371 1 ,004
Fisher's Exact Test ,006 ,006
Linear-by-Linear Association 9,245 1 ,002
N of Valid Cases 50

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for SIKAP


9,714 1,948 48,454
(POSITIF / NEGATIF)
For cohort GDS KATEGORI
1,707 1,022 2,848
= Terkontrol
For cohort GDS KATEGORI
,176 ,051 ,603
= Tidak Terkontrol
N of Valid Cases 50
Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

PENGETAHUAN * GDS
50 100,0% 0 0,0% 50 100,0%
KATEGORI

PENGETAHUAN * GDS KATEGORI Crosstabulation

GDS KATEGORI Total

Terkontrol Tidak Terkontrol

Count 15 4 19

Expected Count 15,6 3,4 19,0

% within PENGETAHUAN 78,9% 21,1% 100,0%

% within GDS KATEGORI 36,6% 44,4% 38,0%


BAIK
% of Total 30,0% 8,0% 38,0%

Residual -,6 ,6

Std. Residual -,1 ,3

Adjusted Residual -,4 ,4


PENGETAHUAN
Count 26 5 31

Expected Count 25,4 5,6 31,0

% within PENGETAHUAN 83,9% 16,1% 100,0%

% within GDS KATEGORI 63,4% 55,6% 62,0%


KURANG
% of Total 52,0% 10,0% 62,0%

Residual ,6 -,6

Std. Residual ,1 -,2

Adjusted Residual ,4 -,4


Count 41 9 50

Expected Count 41,0 9,0 50,0

Total % within PENGETAHUAN 82,0% 18,0% 100,0%

% within GDS KATEGORI 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 82,0% 18,0% 100,0%


Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square ,193 1 ,660
b
Continuity Correction ,004 1 ,952
Likelihood Ratio ,191 1 ,662
Fisher's Exact Test ,715 ,468
Linear-by-Linear Association ,190 1 ,663
N of Valid Cases 50

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,42.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for


PENGETAHUAN (BAIK / ,721 ,167 3,106
KURANG)
For cohort GDS KATEGORI
,941 ,712 1,244
= Terkontrol
For cohort GDS KATEGORI
1,305 ,399 4,266
= Tidak Terkontrol
N of Valid Cases 50

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy