Practice Exam Vol1 (Solutions)
Practice Exam Vol1 (Solutions)
Chapter 1 (Introduction)
Examination Summary
The marks you have received on each question can be added in the final column.
Total Your
Question Type Of Question Or Subject Marks Mark
1 Essay Question 15
2-7 True Or False Questions 9
8 - 14 Multiple Choice Questions 21
15 Residence 20
16 Net Income For Tax Purposes 35
Total 100
Part B
The term “person” as used in the Income Tax Act refers to individuals, corporations, and trusts.
The term “person” in the GST legislation refers to anyone engaged in commercial activity. While
other answers are possible, a common example of an entity that could be subject to GST but not
income tax would be a partnership. Other answers (see text) are acceptable.
4. True. Corporations and trusts are required to file income tax returns.
5. False. Partnerships are not required to file income tax returns.
6. True. Most authorities believe that progressive income tax rates encourage tax evasion.
7. True. Horizontal equity refers to individuals in the same economic position paying the same
amount of taxes.
Case 2
As she is exempt from taxation in Latvia because she is the spouse of a deemed Canadian resident,
Maxine would be a deemed resident of Canada for income tax purposes during 2020 [(ITA
250(1)(g)].
Maxine will be subject to Canadian tax on her worldwide income during 2020.
Case 3
As noted in S5-F1-C1, “Determining an Individual’s Residence Status”, commuting from the U.S.
for employment purposes does not make an individual a deemed resident under the sojourner rules.
Therefore, Susan would not be considered a Canadian resident for income tax purposes.
While Susan will be subject to Canadian tax on her Canadian employment income, she would not
be subject to Canadian tax on her U.S. savings account interest. As noted in the text, individuals
employed in Canada are not subject to the sojourner rule.
Case B
The Case B solution would be calculated as follows:
11
Income Under ITA 3(a):
Employment Income $33,000
Income From Property 14,000 $47,000
Income Under ITA 3(b):
Taxable Capital Gains $36,000
Allowable Capital Losses ( 42,000) Nil
Balance From ITA 3(a) And (b) $47,000
Subdivision e Deductions ( 7,000)
Balance From ITA 3(c) $40,000
Deduction Under ITA 3(d):
Business Loss ( 39,000)
Net Income For Tax Purposes (Division B Income) $ 1,000
Case C
The Case C solution would be calculated as follows:
Income Under ITA 3(a):
Employment Income $16,000
Income From Business 22,000 $38,000
Income Under ITA 3(b):
Taxable Capital Gains $32,000
Allowable Capital Losses ( 69,000) Nil 11
Balance From ITA 3(a) and (b) $38,000
Subdivision e Deductions ( 5,000)
Balance From ITA 3(c) $33,000
Deduction Under ITA 3(d):
Property Loss ( 21,000)
Net Income For Tax Purposes (Division B Income) $12,000
Case D
The Case D solution would be calculated as follows:
Income Under ITA 3(a):
Employment Income $28,000
Income From Business 15,000 $43,000
Income Under ITA 3(b):
Taxable Capital Gains $21,000
Allowable Capital Losses ( 27,000) Nil 15
Balance From ITA 3(a) And (b) $43,000
Subdivision e Deductions ( 11,000)
Balance From ITA 3(c) $32,000
Deduction Under ITA 3(d):
Property Loss ( 36,000)
Net Income For Tax Purposes (Division B Income) Nil
As Ms. Rizk’s property loss exceeds the amount carried forward from ITA 3(c), her total Net
Income For Tax Purposes (Division B income) is nil.
Total Your
Question Type Of Question Or Subject Marks Mark
1 Essay Questions 20
2-7 True Or False 9
8 - 14 Multiple Choice 21
15 Instalments 50
Total 100
NOTE There are other situations that could be listed that would require a return to be filed.
Part B
The procedures can be outlined as follows:
• The first step would be to contact the CRA to discuss the changes contained in the
reassessment.
• If informal discussions do not resolve the issue, the next step would be a notice of
objection. This must be filed the later of:
• one year after the due date for the return (April 30, 2021) or
• 90 days after the January 10 date of the Notice of Reassessment. (This would 11
be April 10, 2021.)
• If there is an adverse decision on the notice of objection, Jane can appeal to the
Tax Court Of Canada. This has to be done within 90 days of receiving the decision
on the notice of objection. She can use the informal procedure or the general
procedure.
• Provided she has used the general procedure, a further appeal can be made to the
Federal Court Of Appeal. This must be done within 30 days of receiving the Tax
Court Of Canada decision.
12. A. October 31, 2020, two months after the year end.
13. C. The notice of objection must be filed the later of one year after the due date for
the return (April 30, 2022) or 90 days after the date of the notice of assessment
(August 10, 2021).
14. A. If the informal procedure has been used in the Tax Court Of Canada, no further
appeal is allowed.
As the net tax owing for the current year and one of the two preceding years exceeds
$3,000, instalment payments are required. 31
2. The three acceptable alternatives would be as follows:
• Quarterly instalments of $996.25 ($3,985 ÷ 4) based on the current year estimate.
• Quarterly instalments of $1,655.00 ($6,620 ÷ 4) based on the first preceding year.
• Two quarterly instalments of $1,420.50 ($5,682 ÷ 4), followed by two quarterly
instalments of $1,889.50 {[$6,620 - (2)($1,420.50)] ÷ 2]}, for a total of $6,620.
3. The best alternative would be quarterly instalments of $996.25 based on the current
year estimate.
The instalments would be due on March 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15,
2020.
Case Two
1. The net tax owing for the years 2018 through 2020 would be calculated as follows:
3. As the net tax owing for 2019 was nil, using this year as the instalment base would
be the best alternative.
The instalments would be due on March 15, June 15, September 15, and
December 15, 2020, if instalments were paid.
Case Three
1. The net tax owing for the years 2018 through 2020 would be calculated as follows:
As the net tax owing for the current year and one of the two preceding years exceeds
$3,000, instalment payments are required. 29
2. The three acceptable alternatives would be as follows:
• Quarterly instalments of $1,602.25 ($6,409 ÷ 4) based on the current year
estimate.
• Quarterly instalments of $825.50 ($3,302 ÷ 4) based on the first preceding
year.
• As there was no net tax owing in 2018, the first two quarterly instalments would
be nil, followed by two quarterly instalments of $1,651 [($3,302 - Nil) ÷ 2].
3. The best alternative would be the one used by the CRA in its quarterly Instalment
Reminders as it provides some tax deferral. No instalments would be required on
March 15 or June 15. The two instalments of $1,651 would be required on
September 15 and December 15, 2020.
Case Four
1. As the corporation’s Tax Payable for both the current and the preceding year
exceeds $3,000, instalments are required.
2. The three acceptable alternatives would be as follows:
• Monthly instalments of $5,371.42 ($64,457 ÷ 12) based on the current year 23
estimate.
• Monthly instalments of $1,898.75 ($22,785 ÷ 12) based on the first preceding
year.
Case Five
1. As the corporation’s Tax Payable for both the current and the preceding year exceeds
$3,000, instalments are required. As the corporation qualifies as a small CCPC, the
instalments will be quarterly.
2. The three acceptable alternatives would be as follows:
• Quarterly instalments of $16,114.25 ($64,457 ÷ 4) based on the current year
estimate.
• Quarterly instalments of $17,890.00 ($71,560 ÷ 4) based on the preceding year. 23
• One quarterly instalment of $14,185.50 ($56,742 ÷ 4), followed by three
quarterly instalments of $19,124.83 [($71,560 - $14,185.50) ÷ 3], a total of
$71,560.
3. The best alternative would be four quarterly instalments of $16,114.25, for a total of
$64,457.
The instalments are due on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 2020.
Total Your
Question Type Of Question Or Subject Marks Mark
1 Essay Question 12
2 Essay Question 8
3-8 True Or False 9
9 - 15 Multiple Choice 21
16 Employment Income 20
17 Exercises 30
Total 100
Case B
As the bonus was not paid within 180 days of the company’s year end, it cannot be deducted
until it is paid. This would occur in the year ending September 30, 2022.
The employee would include it in income in the year ending December 31, 2021.
Case C
In this case, the bonus is paid more than three years after the end of the calendar year in which
the services were rendered. This makes it a salary deferral arrangement. The company will
deduct the bonus in the year ending September 30, 2020.
The employee must include it in income in the year ending December 31, 2020.
Solution 2 (8 Marks)
There are a great many items that could be listed here. The description of various taxable and
non-taxable benefits begins at Paragraph 3-53 of the text.
3. True. One of the advantages of being classified as a self-employed contractor is that you
have a larger range of available tax deductions.
4. False. Acquiring one’s tools is an indication that you are an independent contractor.
5. False. The $200 excess over $500 will have to be included in Gerri’s income.
6. False. The standby charge may be reduced if the employee uses the car more than 50
percent for employment-related activities.
7. True. To be considered reasonable, an allowance paid to an employee for using his
automobile in employment-related activities must be based on kilometres of use.
8. False. Such reimbursements are limited to the first $15,000, plus one-half of any excess.
One-half of any amount in excess of $15,000 is considered a taxable benefit.
12. C. An allowance of $600 per month to compensate the employee for using his personal
automobile for employment-related activities.
15. D. $12,000. Under ITA 8(1)(f) he could have deducted $23,500 [(1/2)($23,000) + $12,000)].
However, this is limited by his commission income received of $9,000 ($16,000 - $7,000). He
would maximize his deduction by using ITA 8(1)(h) to deduct the hotel and airline costs of
$12,000.
Salary $40,500
Reimbursement Of Travel Costs Nil
Reimbursement Of Tuition Fees Nil
Fees As Director 1,200
Registered Pension Plan Contribution ( 1,400)
Net Employment Income $40,300
Notes:
1. As the reimbursement of employment-related travel costs appears to be based on actual
expenditures, it is not a taxable benefit and can be left out of all income calculations. Since
the reimbursement is not taxable, the cost of employment-related travel is not deductible.
2. As the course was work related, there is no taxable benefit for the employer reimbursed
tuition fees. However, the tuition fees will not be eligible for a credit against taxes payable.
3. The dividends will be included in income, but not as a component of employment income.
Rather they are income from property.
5. The premiums for group medical insurance and the dental expenses will qualify as medical
expenses and will be eligible for treatment as a credit against taxes payable. However, they
cannot be deducted in the calculation of employment income.
6. The employer’s contribution to the registered pension plan is not a taxable benefit.
7. Charitable donations will generate a credit against an individual’s taxes payable. However,
they cannot be deducted in the calculation of employment income.
8. The life insurance premiums and the costs of travel to and from work are not deductible
expenses. Since Ms. Marsh has not moved to a new work location, the costs of moving to a
larger apartment are not deductible.
*[(9)(1,667)]
B. As the car allowance is not based on kilometres, Mr. Sotomeyer will have to include the
$12,000 allowance that was received from his employer in his employment income. He can
deduct the employment-related portion of his actual automobile costs against this amount.
This would be $4,740 [($11,460)(19,960/48,260)]. The net inclusion would be $7,260
($12,000 - $4,740).
C. As her employer contributes to the plan, and the contributions do not create a taxable benefit,
the $7,400 in benefits received during the year will be included in her employment income.
This will be reduced by the $960 ($460 + $500) in non-deductible contributions that she
made during 2019 and 2020, leaving a net inclusion of $6,440 ($7,400 - $960).
Examination Summary
The marks you have received on each question can be added in the final column.
Total Your
Question Type Of Question Or Subject Marks Mark
1 Essay Questions 10
2-7 True Or False Questions 9
8 - 14 Multiple Choice Questions 21
15 Personal Tax Credits 10
16 Charitable Donations Tax Credit 15
17 Medical Expenses Tax Credit 20
18 Tuition Tax Credit 15
Total 100
12. B. If the individual is a parent or grandparent, they do not have to be under 18.
13. B. A payment from the Canada Pension Plan.
14. A. The goods and services tax credit.
Since Ms. Borat claims her daughter for the eligible dependant credit, her son cannot qualify for this
credit. This means that she can claim the Canada caregiver amount for him.
As his income for 2021 is unchanged from 2020, the limit would be the same $69,000
[(75%)($92,000)]. Charitable donations can be carried forward for up to five years. As a result, the
final year to claim any unused portion of his 2020 donation would be 2025.
Alternative Calculation
David’s Tax Payable before deducting his tuition credits would be $2,936 [(15%)($32,800 -
$13,229)]. This would be sufficient to absorb all of the $1,778 in tuition credits, leaving no carry
forward to subsequent years.
Chapter 5 (CCA)
Examination Summary
The marks you have received on each question can be added in the final column.
Total Your
Question Type Of Question Or Subject Marks Mark
1 Essay Question 10
8 - 14 Multiple Choice 21
15 CCA Exercises 45
Total 100
Capital Gain A capital gain would arise if the proceeds of disposition were greater than
the capital cost of the asset disposed of. 3
Recapture Of CCA Recapture would occur if, after deducting the lesser of the proceeds of
disposition and the capital cost of the individual asset, there was a negative balance in the
CCA class and a negative balance was still present at the end of the taxation year.
6
Terminal Loss A terminal loss would occur if, after deducting the lesser of the proceeds of
disposition and the capital cost of the individual asset, there was a positive balance in the 6
CCA class but no assets were left in the class.
Part B
The required calculations are as follows:
January 1, 2020, UCC $500,000
Acquisitions During The Year 75,000
AccII Adjustment [(100%)($75,000)] 75,000
CCA Base $650,000
8
2020 CCA [(50%)($650,000)] ( 325,000)
AccII Adjustment Reversal ( 75,000)
January 1, 2021, UCC $250,000
Part C
The required information would be calculated as follows:
UCC Of The Class At The Beginning Of The Year $41,200
Add: Acquisitions During The Year Nil
Deduct: Dispositions During The Year - Lesser Of:
• Capital Cost = $46,000
• Proceeds Of Disposition = $43,500 ( 43,500)
8
Add: AccII Adjustment* Nil *Mark is
Negative Ending Balance ($ 2,300) given if no
Recapture Of CCA 2,300 AccII
January 1, 2021, UCC Balance Nil Adjustment
is made.
*The AccII Adjustment is only made when the net amount is positive.
The effect would be an addition to business income of $2,300 in recaptured CCA. Note that,
unlike terminal losses, the fact that there is still an asset in the class is irrelevant.
Part D
The required information would be calculated as follows:
UCC Of The Class At The Beginning Of The Year $41,200
Add: Acquisitions During The Year Nil
Deduct: Dispositions During The Year - Lesser Of:
• Capital Cost = $92,000
8
• Proceeds Of Disposition = $31,000 ( 31,000) *Mark is
Add: AccII Adjustment* Nil given if no
Ending Balance With No Remaining Assets $10,200 AccII
Terminal Loss ( 10,200) Adjustment
is made.
January 1, 2021, UCC Balance Nil
As there is a positive balance in Class 8 at the end of the year, but no remaining assets, there
would be a terminal loss of $10,200. This loss is deducted in the calculation of net business
income.
Your Mark = [(# of grading points ÷ 35)(45%)] = ___%
While Domtex would still have a goodwill account, the capital cost would be nil. There would be
maximum CCA of $7,299 and a taxable capital gain of $4,500 resulting in a net decrease in Net
Income For Tax Purposes of $2,799.
1 grading point for each highlighted item. Total 20
Your Mark = [(# of grading points ÷ 20)(15%)] = ___%
Examination Summary
The marks you have received on each question can be added in the final column.
Total Your
Question Type Of Question Or Subject Marks Mark
1 Essay Question 9
2-7 True Or False 9
8 - 14 Multiple Choice 21
15 Reserves 12
16 Inventory Valuation 12
17 Business Income Reconciliation 37
Total 100
Solution 1 (9 Marks)
The text discusses six criteria for making this distinction, any three of which would satisfy the
requirements of the question. The six are as follows:
• Intent Did the individual intend to hold the asset to produce income or, alternatively, to
resell at a profit?
• Length Of The Ownership Period The longer the period of ownership, the more likely it is
that the taxpayer’s intent was to hold the asset to produce income.
• Nature Of The Assets The conventional accounting distinction between fixed assets and
working capital has been used in some cases to determine whether income was business or
capital in nature. Also, whether the asset is capable of producing income would be a
consideration.
Other Items Further explanation related to the items not included in the preceding calculation
of net business income are as follows:
Reserve For Doubtful Debts This reserve is deductible as it is specifically provided
for in the Income Tax Act. [ITA 20(1)(l)]
Loss From Theft Losses of this type are considered to be deductible as a normal
cost of doing business.
Cost Of Sponsoring Local Hockey Team This would appear to be a legitimate
advertising expense.
Mortgage Interest The interest would be deductible as the building is a capital
asset of the business.
Damages As the damages relate to a transaction that produces business income,
they are considered a business expense.
Fees Paid To Son Since the fees paid to John’s son are reasonable when
compared to those charged by a non-arm’s length party, they are deductible.
Examination Summary
The marks you have received on each question can be added in the final column.
Total Your
Question Type Of Question Or Subject Marks Mark
1 Essay Question 10
2-7 True Or False 9
8 - 14 Multiple Choice 21
15 Alternative Investments 25
16 Income Trusts, Mutual Funds, and
Foreign Source Income 35
Total 100
• Each rental property with a cost that is greater than $50,000 must be included in a separate
CCA Class. 7
• Taxpayers are not allowed to either create or increase a net rental loss through the
deduction of CCA.
Part B
The full $10,000 will have to be included in the investor’s Net Income For Tax Purposes. He will 10
be entitled to a tax credit of only $1,500 as, on non-business income, the credit is limited
to 15 percent.
The remaining $2,500 ($4,000 - $1,500) can be deducted in the determination of Net Income For
Tax Purposes.
12. B. The federal dividend tax credit is not always equal to 6/11 of the gross up.
13. B. The $12,000 distribution would result in 76.92 additional units ($12,000 ÷ 156). Given
this, the adjusted cost base of the units would be $150.43 [($150,000 + $12,000) ÷ (1,000 +
76.92)].
14. D. While the tax credit is limited to $1,800 [(15%)($12,000)], the additional $1,800 of
withholding can be deducted. This leaves an increase in Net Income For Tax Purposes of
$10,200 ($12,000 - $1,800).
REIT
Golden Mountain Distribution [($8.75)(1,200)] $10,500
Return Of Capital [($3.25)(1,200)] ( 3,900) 6,600 30
Blackman Mutual Fund
Blackman Eligible Dividends [($0.70)(8,500)] $ 5,950
Dividend Gross Up [(38%)($5,950)] 2,261 8,211
Taxable Capital Gain [(1/2)($0.80)(8,500)] 3,400
Blackman Interest [($0.60)(8,500)] 5,100
Taxable Income $73,186
Tax Rate (29% + 13%) 42%
Tax Before Credits $30,738
Dividend Tax Credit [($2,261)(6/11 + 21%)] ( 1,708)
Foreign Tax Credit [(15%)(7%)(€500,000)($1.50)] (Note) ( 7,875)
Tax Payable $21,155
Note - Foreign Source Property Income As required, 100 percent of the foreign
interest is included in Net Income For Tax Purposes. However, for individuals, the
credit against Tax Payable that is provided under ITA 126(1) is limited to a maximum
of 15 percent of the foreign source non-business income. Since the withheld amount
exceeds 15 percent, the excess is deducted and does not qualify for treatment as a
foreign tax credit.
Examination Summary
The marks you have received on each question can be added in the final column.
Total Your
Question Type Of Question Or Subject Marks Mark
1 Essay Questions 10
2-7 True Or False Questions 9
8 - 14 Multiple Choice Questions 21
15 Involuntary Dispositions 35
16 Principal Residence Rules 25
Total 100
B. Listed personal property is certain specified items of personal use property. The included
items are works of art, jewelry, rare books, stamps, and coins (this is not required).
C. In calculating the capital gain or loss on personal use property, the $1,000 floor rule is used.
The proceeds are deemed to be the greater of $1,000 and the actual proceeds and the
adjusted cost base is deemed to be the greater of $1,000 and the actual adjusted cost base.
One-half of any gain, i.e., the taxable capital gain, on personal use property must be included
in the individual’s Net Income For Tax Purposes. Losses are not deductible.
The only difference in treatment for listed personal property is that allowable capital losses on
listed personal property can be deducted against taxable capital gains on listed personal
property.
For 2020, there is no CCA claim. Instead, there is $75,000 in recaptured CCA that must be taken
into income. As a result, there is a total of $100,000 ($75,000 + $25,000) that will be added to
Leblanc Ltd.’s 2020 Net Income For Tax Purposes.
Part B
After the asset is replaced in 2021, an election can be made under ITA 44(1), and an amended
return can be filed for 2020. In the amended return, the taxable capital gain will be nil, the lesser
of the amount calculated in Part A ($50,000) and the following:
Proceeds Of Disposition (Insurance Proceeds) $300,000
Less: Cost Of Replacement Property ( 500,000)
Excess, If Any Nil
Using the ITA 13(4) election, a new recapture figure can be calculated as follows:
Part C
Assuming that Leblanc Ltd. makes the appropriate tax minimizing elections under ITA 13(4) and
44(1), the CCA claim for 2021 would be calculated as follows:
Note As a check, you will note that the deemed capital cost of the new building
is $450,000, the capital cost of the old building plus the additional $200,000
($500,000 - $300,000) in funds needed to acquire the replacement building.
In a similar calculation, the UCC for the new building is equal to the UCC of the old
building of $175,000, again plus the $200,000 in additional funds required for the
replacement building.
During the period 2004 through 2020 (17 years), the cottage experienced the larger capital gain
as shown in the preceding table. To minimize the total capital gain, it should be designated the
principal residence for 16 years. This will completely eliminate the capital gain as the exemption
formula adds an additional year. This will leave one year for the city home to be designated his
principal residence.
Given this approach, the exemptions would be as follows:
City Home Cottage
Capital Gains Before Exemptions $232,000 $278,000
Exemption:
City Home [$232,000][(1 + 1) ÷ 17] ( 27,294)
Cottage [$278,000][(16 + 1) ÷17] ( 278,000)
Capital Gain $204,706 Nil
This gives a total capital gain of $204,706 on the two properties and a taxable capital gain of
$102,353 [(1/2)($204,706)].
1 grading point for each highlighted item. Total 17
Your Mark = [(# of grading points ÷ 17)(15%)] = ___%
Examination Summary
The marks you have received on each question can be added in the final column.
Total Your
Question Type Of Question Or Subject Marks Mark
1 Essay Question 10
2-7 True Or False Questions 9
8 - 14 Multiple Choice Questions 21
15 Moving Costs 25
16 Income Attribution 35
Total 100
Notes:
1. With respect to the first trip, only the costs for the three days after the acquisition of the new
residence would be allowed. Neither the airfare nor the car rental costs are deductible by
Mr. Tully.
2. The limit of 15 days’ expenses for meals and lodging near the old or new homes would not
be exceeded in this situation as there are only 13 days in total.
3. The property taxes on the old home to the date of sale would not be deductible.
5. The fact that Mr. Tully started work for the new employer fairly late in the current year acts to
limit the amount that he can deduct. However, the unused balance of $17,223 can be carried
forward.
Since Mrs. Morris did not elect out of Section 73 on the transfer to Mr. Morris, the shares are
transferred at her adjusted cost base and no gain will be recognized when the shares are
transferred.
As there is no attribution of capital gains on shares transferred to a related minor, the sale of
Martha’s shares will have no effect on Mrs. Morris.
Martha At Sale
The capital gain that accrued subsequent to the transfer of the shares will be allocated to Martha.
The amount is calculated as follows:
Examination Summary
The marks you have received on each question can be added in the final column.
Total Your
Question Type Of Question Or Subject Marks Mark
1 Essay Questions 10
2-7 True Or False Questions 9
8 - 14 Multiple Choice Questions 21
15 RRSP Contributions 40
16 Chapter 10 Exercises 20
Total 100
B. A spousal RRSP is an RRSP to which the registrant’s spouse has made a contribution. If the
registrant’s spouse has made a contribution in either the current year or in the two preceding
years, the withdrawal (to the extent of all contributions made by the spouse) will be taxed in
the hands of the spouse.
Mr. Sparks’ Net Income For Tax Purposes is $47,000 and he has a net capital loss carry over of
$3,000 ($7,500 - $10,500).
Part B - Case 1
Mr. Sparks’ earned income would be calculated as follows:
Net Employment Income $60,000
Add Back RPP Contributions 1,000
Business Loss ( 16,000)
2019 Earned Income $45,000
Given this, his maximum deductible RRSP contribution would be calculated as follows: 11
Unused Deduction Room Carried Forward From 2019 Nil
Annual Addition - Lesser Of:
• 2020 RRSP dollar limit = $27,230
• 18% of 2019 Earned Income of $45,000 = $8,100 $8,100
Less 2019 PA ($1,000 + $1,500) ( 2,500)
Maximum Deductible RRSP Contribution $5,600
Part B - Case 2
Mr. Sparks’ earned income would be calculated as follows:
Net Employment Income $60,000
Business Loss ( 16,000)
2019 Earned Income $44,000
Given this, his maximum deductible RRSP contribution would be calculated as follows: 9
Unused Deduction Room Carried Forward From 2019 Nil
Annual Addition - Lesser Of:
• 2020 RRSP dollar limit = $27,230
• 18% of 2019 Earned Income of $44,000 = $7,920 $7,920
Less 2019 PA ( 1,500)
Maximum Deductible RRSP Contribution $6,420
Part B - Case 3
Mr. Sparks’ earned income would be calculated as follows:
Net Employment Income $ 60,000
Business Loss ( 16,000)
Net Rental Income 140,000
201- Earned Income $184,000
Given this, his maximum deductible RRSP contribution would be calculated as follows:
9
Unused Deduction Room Carried Forward From 2019 Nil
Annual Addition - Lesser Of:
• 2020 RRSP dollar limit = $27,230
• 18% of 2019 Earned Income of $184,000 = $33,120 $27,230
Less 2019 PA Nil
2020 RRSP Deduction Limit $27,230
Less 2020 Contribution to Spousal RRSP ( 1,500)
Maximum Deductible RRSP Contribution $25,730
The after tax funds from both the RRSP and TFSA are equal and $369 ($9,918 - $9,549) greater
than the after tax funds from investing outside of both plans. Since the goal is to remove the
funds in four years, it would be more advantageous to use the TFSA as withdrawals are added
back to the TFSA contribution room. In addition, with the assumption that Bab’s tax rate stays the
same, the RRSP contribution will not result in the withdrawal being taxed at a lower rate.
Part B
As a spousal contribution was made in 2018, one of the two years prior to 2020, income
attribution will apply. However, it will only apply to the extent of the $10,000 contribution made by
Mrs. Trump. This means that $10,000 of the withdrawal will be taxed in the hands of Mrs. Trump,
6
with the remaining $5,000 taxed in the hands of Mr. Trump.
Part C
The pension adjustment will be calculated as follows:
Employer’s RPP Contribution $3,200
Employer’s DPSP Contribution 700
Employee’s RPP Contribution 3,200
4
PA For The Current Year $7,100