Analysis of Gain Improvement Techniques: Ashish Angural, Ravi Prakash Dwivedi
Analysis of Gain Improvement Techniques: Ashish Angural, Ravi Prakash Dwivedi
in Education & Technology (IJARET) Vol. 3, Issue 2 (April - June 2016) ISSN : 2394-6814 (Print)
Abstract
A compact antenna is proposed and designed which is having high in-band selectivity. A via-fed monopole antenna is proposed
with ‘via’ between radiator and ground plane. Different techniques have been used to make antenna with the frequency of operation
4.5 GHz. The different design techniques include are varying substrate thickness; using low dielectric substrate; using aperture
coupling; and using Coplanar Waveguide. Further, the design need to be optimized to operate for the band 2.4-5.8 GHz with having
ultra-wide band.
Keywords
Wideband, Via-fed, Impedance Bandwidth, Return Loss.
It was designed on low cost two sided PCB. The radiator and
ground plane of the micro-strip line feeding line form a pair of
tapered shape on the bottom layer of the PCB.The tapered shape
provide a wideband matching of antenna to achieve good return
loss within the UWB band.The top layer is a 50-ohm feeding line
connected to the radiator on the bottom through via.The antenna
given are designed with dielectric constant of 2.55, substrate
thickness of 0.8mm, and loss tangent of 0.003 and the frequency
used is 4.5 GHz. Figure 1 shows the design for antenna with
dimensions.
Result
Optimization Techniques:
The various techniques involved for gain improvement
includes:
• Varying the height of the substrate.
• Using reflector planes.
• Thick substrate with low dielectric constant.
• Insertion of air gap between top and bottom plane of
V. Simulation Results antenna.
The antenna is designed and simulated using HFSS, a 3-D model • Antenna loaded with metamaterial structure has the capability
simulation tool for EM structures design and simulation. to increase the gain and reduce the return loss as its dielectric
constant reduces because of the structure.
Antenna Design
The Type-A antenna with the given specifications is designed and Antenna design using gain improvement techniques are
is shown in Figure 2. The various physical parameters are as: as:
X-axis = 28.5 mm, Y-axis = 28 mm. • Varying Substrate height: The effect of varying substrate
Stripline Length = 16.9 mm, height is supposed to be seen on the gain that by increasing
Stripline Width = 2.26 mm. substrate height keeping relative permittivity constant, gain
Via radius = 0.3 mm. will increase. Also, the effect on physical dimensions of
Dielectric Constant = 2.55. antenna is that the width of the stripline will change in order
Substrate Thickness = 0.8 mm. to match impedance.
Design
VI. Conclusions
The main objective of this work is to make a wireless antenna and
to analyze various gain enhancement techniques. In this paper,
we used increased thickness and low dielectric substrate, which
will verify the techniques mentioned. Also the effect of varying
thickness can be seen on the width of the strip line structure.
References
[1] Sai Wai Wong, Tian Gui Huang, Chun Xu Mao, Zhi Ning
Chen, and Qing Xin Chu, “Planar Filtering UWB Antenna
with Shorting Pins,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation, vol. 61, no. 2, February 2013.
[2] Anwar Sabah Mekki, Mohd. Nizar HamidonAlyani Ismail,
Adam R.H. Alhawari, “Gain Enhancement of a Microstip
Result Obtained: Patch Antenna using a Reflecting Layer,” International
Journal of Antennas and Propagation Article ID 97563.
[3] Surya Sevak Singh, Sheetal R. Bhujade, “Design and
Evaluation of High Gain Microstrip Patch Antenna using
Double Layer with Air Gap,” International Journal on
Recent Trends in Computing and Communication Vol. 3,
Issue 3..
[4] Amandeep Bath, Abhishek Thakur, Jitender Sharma, Prof.
Basudeo Prasad, “Study of Different Techniques to Design
Ultra-Wideband Antenna,” IJEEE, Vol. 1, Issue 1 (Jan-Feb
2014).
[5] M. Gopikrishna, D. D. Krishna, C. K. Aanandan, P. Mohanan,
and K. Vasudevan, “Compact linear tapered slot Antenna
The antenna resonates at 4.1 GHz.The return loss obtained from for UWB application,” Electron. Lett, vol. 44, no. 20, Sep.
the design is -19.96 dB which gives the gain of 1.88 dB. The 25, 2008.
further optimization of antenna gives the return loss of -21.09 dB [6] H. W. Liu and C. F. Yang, “Miniature hook-shaped monopole
with gain of 2.64 dB.So, we can say that increasing the height of antenna for UWB applications,” Electron. Lett, vol. 46, no.
substrate while keeping relative permittivity constant, gain will 4, Feb. 2010.
increase. [7] R. Azim, M. T. Islam, and N. Misran, “Compact tapered-
The design is also simulated for air as substrate by taking the air shape slot antenna for UWB applications,” IEEE Antennas
gap as 0.8 mm and 1.6 mm which will give return loss at -15.08 dB Wireless Propag. Let., vol. 10, pp. 1190–1193, Oct. 2011.
and -19.07 dB respectively at 4.5 GHz. The relative permittivity [8] K Shambavi, “Gain and Bandwidth Enhancement Technique
for air used is 1.0006 and the width of the stripline for 0.8 mm in Square Microstrip Antenna for WLAN Applications,”
gap is 3.92 mm and for that of 1.6 mm gap is 7.85 mm. Preceedings of Asia Pacific Microwave Conference 2007.
[9] Gaith Mansour, Michael, Peter S. Hall, Peter Gardner, and
Comparison table for various designs EkasitNugoolcharornlap, “Design of Filtering Microstrip
Design Return Peak Gain Antenna using Filter Synthesis Approach,” Progress In
Parameters
Type Loss (dB) (dB) Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 145, 59-67, 2014.
L = 16.9 mm
Base -34.85
W = 2.26 mm
Paper at 1.38
Substrate thickness = 0.8 mm
Design 4.5 GHz
Relative Permittivity = 2.55
L = 16.9 mm
Varied -21.09
W = 4.52 mm
Substrate at 2.64
Substrate thickness = 1.6 mm
Thickness 4.1 GHz
Relative Permittivity = 2.55
L = 16.9 mm
-15.08
Air W = 3.92 mm
at 1.24
substrate Substrate thickness = 0.8 mm
4.5 GHz
Relative Permittivity = 1.0006
Air
L = 16.9 mm
substrate -19.07
W = 7.85 mm
with at 1.29
Substrate thickness = 1.6mm
increased 4.5 GHz
Relative Permittivity = 2.55
thickness