Transient Ischemic Attack Precipitating Factors Predisposing Factors
Transient Ischemic Attack Precipitating Factors Predisposing Factors
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY Hypertension
Age
Heredity Diabetes mellitus
Sex Undesirable levels of
cholesterol
Poor diet
Physical inactivity
LEGEND
Disease process
Signs and symptoms
Nursing Dx
Nursing Management
Toxic irritants from tobacco damages the
Medical Management
endothelium
Surgical Management
Not Treated
Treated
Damage becomes site for atherosclerosis
Diagnostic tests
Lab results
Losartan
CVD (Stroke) MRI, CT SCAN
Clonidine
Amlodipine
Carotid endarterectomy
Cerebral ischemia Weakness in one arm or leg Craniectomy and hemispheric
dizziness decompression
Slurred speech
Initiation of ischemic cascade
Anti-platelet drugs
anticoagulants
Ineffective Cerebral Tissue
High buildup of sodium and Perfusion
calcium in the cell.
• Check rapid changes or
High sodium level draws water into continued shifts in mental Good cerebral perfusion
the cell called cytotoxic edema status.
• Initiation of FAST
Pallative care
High calcium leads up to build up Na -143.9 mmol/L
Frequent vital sign and
of reactive oxygen radicals K – 3.12 mmol/L neuro vital sign
• Lymphocytes 41.3
• Eosinophils 12.g
Inflammation damages blood brain barrier
\ allowing fluids and proteins into the cell causing
vasogenic edema.
Blood tests
Numbness on the feet left side of the brain, trouble speaking, difficulty of walking, dizziness and
sudden severe headache
DEATH
Using Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: What Is the Hold Up?
Abstract
Alteplase is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved intravenous (IV) thrombolytic medication for acute ischemic stroke. However, multiple
recent studies comparing tenecteplase and alteplase suggest that tenecteplase is at least as efficacious as alteplase with regards to neurologic
improvement. When given at 0.25 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), tenecteplase may have less bleeding complications than alteplase as well. This
narrative review evaluates the literature and addresses the practical issues with regards to the use of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute
ischemic stroke, and it recommends that physicians consider tenecteplase rather than alteplase for thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke.
The results of five randomized controlled trials have been published that compare alteplase and tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke.7–11 The first
was by Haley et al, published in 2010,7 and it randomized patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke within 3 hours to tenecteplase 0.1
milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg, tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg, or standard dose alteplase (0.9 mg/kg). Patients in the
tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg group had the lowest rate of good neurologic outcomes at three months (defined as modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1).
There were no statistically significant differences among the other groups, but there was a trend towards higher percentages of patients having good
neurologic outcomes in the tenecteplase 0.1 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg groups as compared to the alteplase group: tenecteplase 0.1 mg/kg 45.2%,
tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg 48.4%, and alteplase 41.9%
Conclusion
Tenecteplase is at least as effective as alteplase with regards to neurologic improvement after treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Additionally,
tenecteplase is less expensive, easier to administer, and may have less bleeding complications than alteplase. Thus, physicians should consider
using tenecteplase rather than alteplase for thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke. If used, the preferred dose of tenecteplase is 0.25 mg/kg
(maximum 25 mg).