100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views6 pages

Regular Bail

This document contains bail applications submitted by Ridhima Arora seeking bail in two separate cases pending in the Court of Ms. Diksha Dass Ranga and Ms. Geetanjli Goel. In the first case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Ridhima Arora claims to have been falsely implicated and seeks bail as the offense is bailable. In the second case, an FIR was filed against Ridhima Arora under Sections 138 and 420 of the IPC and bail is sought on the grounds that the applicant is law-abiding and the allegations are false. Affidavits supporting the bail applications are also included.

Uploaded by

Harneet Kaur
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views6 pages

Regular Bail

This document contains bail applications submitted by Ridhima Arora seeking bail in two separate cases pending in the Court of Ms. Diksha Dass Ranga and Ms. Geetanjli Goel. In the first case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Ridhima Arora claims to have been falsely implicated and seeks bail as the offense is bailable. In the second case, an FIR was filed against Ridhima Arora under Sections 138 and 420 of the IPC and bail is sought on the grounds that the applicant is law-abiding and the allegations are false. Affidavits supporting the bail applications are also included.

Uploaded by

Harneet Kaur
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

IN THE COURT OF Ms.

DIKSHA DASS RANGA, SUB- DIVISIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,


KALKA

Kuldeep V/s Ridhima Arora

U/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act IPC


Application with a prayer for the taking up of the
file of above stated case and granting the benefit
of the bail to the accused and accepting the bail
bonds and surety bonds
Sir,
The applicant/accused submits as under:-

1. That the above titled case was decided by this Honorable court on dated
19.09.2018. (The copy of the order dated 19.09.208 has been attached
herewith)
2. That on dated 19.09.2018 accused has been declared proclaimed
person. However no summons or warrants has ever been served upon
the accused till date.
3. That yesterday accused came to know about the proceedings of this
case and hence accused is appearing before this honorable court.
4. That the accused is procuring her presence and the offence is a bail able
offence.
5. That there is no purpose to be served by declining the application of the
applicant/ accused for granting him a regular bail
6. That there is no likelihood of vindicate the bail.
7. That the accused has been falsely implicated in this case
8. that accused assured the Honorable court to appear herself on each and
every date or whenever it is called upon to appear before the
honorable court
9. That the accused has no desire to evade the due process of law, shall
face the trial to vindicate his innocence, his detention in the custody will
be a greatly harmful to the accused in the present case
10.That the accused is ready to furnish bail bonds and security bonds as per
satisfaction of the honorable court.

Prayer: - It is respectfully prayed that in the view of the above mentioned facts
and circumstances the honorable court may be graciously pleased to grant bail, to
the applicant/ accused in the interest of justice.

Date :- (Applicant/ Accused)


Place:-

Through Counsel
(Dixit Dhiman)
Advocate
IN THE COURT OF Ms. DIKSHA DASS RANGA, SUB- DIVISIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
KALKA

Kuldeep V/s Ridhima Arora

U/s 138, N.I. Act, read with section 420 of


IPC

AFFIDAVIT
I, Ridhima Arora, D/o Sh. Gobind Arora Aged , R/o
do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-
1. That the above titled case is pending before this Honorable court.
2. That the contents of the main application are true and correct to the
knowledge of the deponent
3. That for the sake of the brevity the contents of the bail application are not
to be reproduced again and the same is to be read as a part and parcel of
this affidavit.

Date:- (Deponent)
Place:-

VERIFICATION:- Verified that the contents of my affidavit are true


and correct to the knowledge of the deponent and nothing has
been concealed there

Date:- (Deponent)
Place:-
IN THE COURT OF Ms. GEETANJLI GOEL, SUB- DIVISIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
KALKA

State v/s Ridhima Arora

Fir No.

P.s. Kalka

First bail application granting the


benefit of the bail to the accused

Sir,
The applicant/accused submits as under:-
1. That the above titled false case is pending before this Hon'ble Court.
2. That the applicant/accused is a peace loving and law abiding citizen
of India and did not commit any offence as alleged by the
prosecution.
3. That the accused has been falsely implicated in this case vide F.I.R.
No. 108 dated in connivance of the police officials.
4. That the accused declared proclaimed offender vide order dated
19.09.2021 in the case ttiled as “kuldeep V/s Rdhiman Arora” U/s sec
138 of N.I Act but the real fact is that no summons or warrants has
ever been served to the accused.
5. that on dated 28.01.2021 accused camt to know about the
pendendcy of the case and appeared before the court on dated
29.01.2021. and the bail was granted to accused on dated
29.01.2021 ( the copy the order has been attached here with). That
on 29.01.2021 the honorable court also issued notice to the I.O.
6. That now the accused came to know about the pendency of this fir .

7. That in the case titled as Tarun kumar V/s Raj Kumar 2014(14) R.C.R.
(Criminal) it was held that petitioner was declared proclaimed
offender, Offence still remain bail able.
11.That in this case titled as Kuldeep V/s Ridhima Arora” in which the
accused declared proclaimed offender has already been granted bail
and the case is fixed on dated 08.09.2021 for the purpose of
appearance.
12.That there is no purpose to be served by declining the application of the
applicant/ accused for granting him a regular bail.
13. That the accused has no desire to evade the due process of law, shall
face the trial to vindicate his innocence, his detention in the custody will
be a greatly harmful to the accused in the present case.
14.That there is no likelihood of the accused to jump over the bail.
15.That the accused is ready to furnish bail bonds and security bonds as per
satisfaction of the honorable court.

Prayer: - It is respectfully prayed that in the view of the above mentioned facts
and circumstances the honorable court may be graciously pleased to grant bail, to
the applicant/ accused and accept the bail bond and surety bonds in the interest
of justice.

Date : (Applicant/ Accused)

Place:-

Through Counsel

(Dixit Dhiman)

Advocate
IN THE COURT OF Ms. GEETANJLI GOEL, SUB- DIVISIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
KALKA

State v/s Ridhima Arora

In Re:-FIR No. -
P.S. Pinjore

AFFIDAVIT
I, Ridhima Arora, W/o Sumit Hooda , Aged R/o
do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-
1. That the above titled case is pending before this Honorable court.
2. That the contents of the application are true and correct to the
knowledge of the deponent
3. That for the sake of the brevity the contents of the bail application
are not to be reproduced again and the same is to be read as a part
and parcel of this affidavit.

Date:- (Deponent)
Place:-

VERIFICATION:- Verified that the contents of my affidavit are true and correct to
the knowledge of the deponent and nothing has been concealed therein.

Date:- (Deponent)
Place:-

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy