Globalization and Business Ethics
Globalization and Business Ethics
If your business falls into one of these categories, there are two types
of international business models to consider: transnational and
multinational.
Transnational corporations have offices in multiple countries, each
responsible for a different facet of the organization. For instance,
marketing may be based in London, research and development in
Bogota, and software development in New York.
Regiocentric Orientation+
Not only in India, but the interchange of world views and ideas has
resulted in a major transformation of the lifestyle and living standard
of people globally. Indian culture is no bar to this transformation
process. Our deep rooted traditions and customs have loosened up
their hold with the emergence of globalization. India has a rich
cultural background and pride of its culture is famous throughout the
world. Globalization has not only inculcated the westernization in
India, but conversely the Indian culture has also spread its impact
globally
IndianCulture
The culture of any country does not only portray the region and
language of the region, but it starts with the mindset and mentality of
the residing citizens. Indian culture is quite rich with respect to its
heritage and resources, and more importantly due to the welcoming
approach of its citizens. India is bouquet of flowers varying religion,
dialect, edibles, tradition, custom, music, art and architecture etc,
bundled into a single unit of patriotism and unity. The common
factor within all these diversities is the Indian mindset of welcoming,
greeting, celebrating in a united way with immense affection and
togetherness. This is the rich essence of the Indian culture that has
attracted many foreigners to stay back in India and mingle into its
eternal fragrance.
Let us start with the key attraction of Indian joint family culture. The
joint families have become a strange surprise to the Indians
especially to those residing in the metropolitan cities in the small flat
culture with the nuclear families blooming up like mushrooms in the
rain. We have lost the patience to get adjusted into the joint family,
imbibing the values of the elders and getting the young ones brought
up under the shadow of their grandparents. Children have started
treating grandparents like guests or visitors, and such an upbringing
is one of the main reasons of increasing old age homes, as those
children consider their own parents as burden in their state of
adulthood
MarriageValues
SocialValues
Lavish multiplex movie halls, big shopping malls and high rise
residential buildings are seen in every city.
Software Industries and telecommunication sectors are enjoying a
tremendous boost in India. Bollywood movies are distributed and
accepted worldwide.
Programming and software Industries, telecommunications and media
segments are getting benefits out of a gigantic lift of this sector in
India.
Entertainment sector in India has made a significant place for itself in
the global market. Indian television channels and serials are watched
and liked by people of different countries all over the world.
New technologies are being used in agriculture sector resulting in
improved yield of crops. Though the development is progressing
rapidly, still many basic problems like prevailing poverty in rural
areas, menace of corruption and instability of the government in the
political arena are a cause of concern and steps should be taken to
bring solution to such problems so as to reap the benefits of
globalisation in the best possible manner.
What is CSR?
Apart from the aforesaid five basic areas of CSR, some minor areas
are also taken note of by many authorities. For instance, Joseph W.
Weiss (2009, pp.126-140) considers ethical advertising as a part of
corporate social responsibility. As a matter of fact, unethical
advertising has become so problematic for consumers that they feel
cheated by the business houses
There are basically six strategies in the adoption of CSR:
First, the firm shows reluctance to adopt any social work or project
(rejection strategy).
Second, the firm vehemently opposes any CSR based project unless
and until the pressure comes from external sources. This strategy is
called adversary strategy.
Third, in the case of resistance strategy, the firm works slowly and
tries to show that it cannot carry on corporate social responsibility due
to a lack of certain factors. However, if the firm is pressurized by the
government, then it yields and accepts the project.
Fourth, once the CSR is accepted the firm follows the compliance
strategy and tries to finish
the project.
Fifth is the accommodation strategy. This strategy helps the fi rm to
accommodate the requests of the shareholders or Government
agencies to work in certain ways for the fulfilment of CSR.
Sixth, is the proactive strategy to go ahead with the project and
complete it according to the priority pattern of the firm.
There are a few models available on CSR. In this section, these will
be discussed and the outline for a new model will be provided:
1. Friedman Model
2. Ackerman Model
3. Carroll Model
4. Environmental Integrity and Community Health Model
5. Corporate Citizenship Model
6. Stockholders and Stakeholders Model
7. towards a New Model of CSR
Friedman Model
Milton Friedman, a renowned economist, is of the view that to ask a
businessman to contribute towards social development is to ask him
to steal from the shareholder’s money to perform social responsibility.
According to Friedman, a businessman has no duty other than
developing his business. If he looks after his business well, he is
performing a social as well as a moral duty.
Friedman, perhaps, develops the idea of Kantian deontic philosophy
by saying that one should perform his duty well as is required by his
profession.
So, a businessman has no other social responsibility to perform
except to serve his shareholders and stockholders.
This view has been made clear by him at many places (1962 & 1973).
Ackerman Model
Robert Ackerman and Robert Bauer developed a model in 1976.
The model has emphasised on the internal policy goals and their
relation to the CSR.
This model depicts four critical stages to arrive at the evaluation of
the social performance audit stage. The four stages involved in CSR
are briefly explained below:
The first stage is marked by the identification of the project that will
be chosen for social Delivery. It also formulates strategies for the
project. The top managers of the company get to know the most
common social problem and then express a willingness to take a
particular project which will solve some social problems.
The second stage is devoted to the intensive study of the problem by
hiring experts and getting their suggestions to make it operational. Till
this stage, the company does not declare the adoption of the project. It
is not made public. The intention to take up the project remains only
internal to the firm.-
The third Stage is very critical for the project as it is not only made
public but is also implemented.
However, at the initial stage, the work for the social project goes on
very slowly until the Company gets advised by the public body
(government). Ackerman advises the managers to take up the project
actively and work hard at the early stage so that managerial discretion
can play its proper role over the entire period of the social project.
The fourth Stage is the stage of evaluation. In this stage the needs of
the society are considered vey minutely and problems and issues are
addressed.
In the Ackerman model, there is an explicit recognition of various
types of learning strategies
for the fulfilment of the project. There are specialized learning,
administrative learning,
Organizational commitment and institutionalisation of the project
philosophy, and also a systematic evaluation of the firm’s
performance of the social responsibility.
Carroll Model
It is one of the most popular models developed by A.B. Carroll in
1991. The mode is based on the idea that there are four levels of
social responsibility. These are:
● Philanthropic
● Economic
● Legal
● Ethical
The philanthropic requirement necessitates good works including
donation, gifts, helping the poor and so on, so that the goodwill of the
company is spread out in the community.
These activities are not required by the business but it promotes
social welfare and goodwill.
Ethical responsibility requires that the firm is following certain moral
standards and ethical values to deal with its stakeholders including the
employees, customers, suppliers and the like.
At the very basic level, each firm has an economic responsibility to
maximise net profits so that it can pay reasonably well to provide
returns on the investment, to pay the shareholders and other investors.
This is an essential social responsibility. Another social responsibility
is to remain legal by abiding the laws of the land. Every firm needs to
obey the government rules and regulations relating to their business
activities.
Environmental Integrity and Community Health Model
This model has been recommended by corporate firms in recent years
in the United States (Redman,2005). There is a hidden business
agenda inbuilt in this model. Business people believe that if the
corporate sector can positively contribute to the environmental
integrity and human health, there will be greater opportunities for the
expansion of business in general and this will, in turn, maximise
profits. Healthy people can work more and earn more. So, consumers’
spending will increase and so will the profit. Therefore, in the same
form CSR is beneficial for the corporate sector. What then is required
is the socially responsible investment portfolio, and a good
relationship with the community which is always beneficial for the
business. Thus, CSR in a particular form is welcome.
Corporate Citizenship Model
The model posits that when a business behaves in a way that satisfies
philanthropic, legal and economic responsibilities well in the
corporate world, it is entitled to corporate citizenship (Maignan et al.
1999, p. 457). To be a corporate citizen, a corporate firm has to satisfy
four conditions: consistently satisfactory and sustainable economic
performance, ethical actions and behaviour beyond the minimum
requirements of law of the land, and voluntary social actions that
enhance the reputation of the company. A particular fi rm’s
commitment to corporate citizenship requires the fulfilment of certain
social responsibilities. Such a citizenship stems from a particular type
of philosophy, and depending on the extent to which it is followed by
a firm, it may or may not qualify to have a corporate citizenship.
Stockholders and Stakeholders Model
The model (see Figure 17.1) discusses (Buono and Nichols, 1990)
two types of social orientations of a firm towards its economic
stockholders and social stakeholders. There are two types of motives
that underlie these two orientations. These motives are: self-interest
and moral duty. Productivism and philanthropy are the two
orientations of the stockholders. Progressivism and ethical idealism
are the orientations of stakeholders. Productivists believe that the only
mission of a corporation is to maximise the self-interest (profit). They
are motivated by the idea of free market ethics and it is argued that
free market generates many important social advantages, as was the
view of Adam Smith. Philanthropists who entertain stockholders’
views propose that helping the poor and the needy can be justified in
terms of morality. However, their motive towards CSR is dominated
by moral obligations and not self-interest. But, they believe that the
primary social duty of a corporation is to obtain profits. In the
stakeholder’s model the dominant ideas are progressivism and ethical
idealism. To ethical idealists, the line of demarcation between
business and society is rather thin, and they believe in the sharing of
corporate profits for humanitarian activities. According to ethical
idealists, CSR is justified when business corporations support
stakeholders’ interests. Progressivists are of the opinion that although
corporate behaviour is basically motivated by self-interest, yet there
should some scope for a social change that can transform the society
towards becoming more humanistic.
Progressivists are in favour of enlightened self-interest where, in spite
of self-interest, socially good works can be undertaken. It is
interesting to note that each of the four modes of the model (see Fig.
19.1) explain social responsibilities in terms of different systems of
beliefs.
Towards a New Model of CSR
An outline of a model of CSR will be discussed here. This model will
concentrate on two critical factors that make the undertaking of CSR
possible or impossible. These two factors are: a company’s
financial capability and its ethical rooting or its absence. Obviously,
the financial prowess of a company is a positive function of its net
profit such that the higher the net profit, the higher is the
financial capability of a company to undertake CSR. However, it is
not alone the financial capability that makes the undertaking of CSR a
reality. There is another factor, the ethical rooting.
If the company is ethically rooted and it is explicitly recognised in its
mission/vision statements,
2the organization can and does undertake CSR.
Precisely, there are five stages in an organizational continuum that
determines the time span of
CSR, if at all undertaken. These five stages (processes) are:
● ethical rooting,
● identifi cation of CSR project,
● policy design and
● decisions.
● implementation of the project and, ethical/social auditing
(evaluation).
In order to decide whether or not a CSR will be undertaken, the
interaction between two factors
will be decisive: the ethical rooting and the fi nancial capability of the
company. If the ethical
rooting and financial capabilities are strong, most probably, the
corporation will undertake CSR.
One must assume in this case the absence any negative externality infl
fencing the decision about
the project. If one arranges the information in a matrix form (shown in
Fig.17.2), one can get the
following four situations:
1. CASE I: Ethical Rooting Strong + Financial Capability
Strong: CSR Undertaken (+)
Companies that embrace ESG find that it improves their brand and
ultimately increases profitability. Customers of today are more
inclined to buy from socially responsible companies and employees
are more interested in working for socially responsible companies.
In research by Cone Communications, the study found that over 60%
of Americans looked favorably on companies that pursued social and
environmental change whether it was regulated or not. Almost 90% of
consumers in the survey indicated they’d be inclined to purchase a
particular product if it supported an issue that was close to their heart.
The study also showed that 75% of consumers refused to buy
anything from a company if it supported an issue they were against.
As the economy improves, society is beginning to expect corporations
to give back to their environments and communities. Besides going a
long way to boost a company’s branding and image, sustainable
practices can aid the financial bottom line. Using less packaging and
less energy in production helps to reduce production costs and
increase revenue.
There are four general and specific ways that companies can join their
efforts between business ethics and social responsibility. They
include:
1. Environmental efforts
2. Philanthropy
3. Ethical labor practices
4. Volunteering