Exhibit 96.

SEC Technical Report Summary

Pre-Feasibility Study
El Brocal
Department of Pasco, Peru
Effective Date:  March 15, 2022
Report Date:  May 4, 2022

Report Prepared for

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.

Las Begonias 415
Floor 19 San Isidro
Lima 15046
Peru

Report Prepared by

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A.

Av.  La Paz 1227 Miraflores
Lima 18
Perú

SRK Project Number:  20M05704

 SRK Consulting (Peru) SA

Av. La Paz 1227, Miraflores

Lima 18, Perú
Tel: +511 206 5900
Email: srk@srk.com.pe

CONSENT OF SRK CONSULTING (PERU) SA

SRK Consulting (Peru) SA (“SRK”), a “qualified person” for purposes of Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (“S-K 1300”), in connection with Compañia de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2021 and any amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively, the “Form 20-F”), consent to:

● the public filing by the Company and use of the technical report titled “SEC Technical Report Summary Pre-Feasibility Study for El Brocal” (the “Technical
Report Summary”), with an effective date of March 15th, 2022, which was prepared in accordance with S-K 1300, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Annual
Report;

● the use of and references to SRK, including the status as an expert “qualified person” (as defined in Sub-Part S-K 1300), in connection with the Form 20-F and
any such Technical Report Summary; and

● the use of information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from those sections of Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, for which SRK is
responsible and which is included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.

SRK is responsible for authoring, and this consent pertains to, the following sections of the Technical Report Summary:

● 1.1, 1.2, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.3.6, 1.3.7, 1.3.8, 1.3.9, 1.3.10, 1.3.12, 1.3.13, 1.3.14, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13.1.1, 13.2, 13.3, 13.4, 13.5,
14, 15.1, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5, 15.6, 15.7, 15.8, 15.9, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 22.5, 22.6, 22.7, 22.9, 23, 24, 25 and Appendixes.

Dated this May 11th, 2022

Angel Mondragon
SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. - Director

Antonio Samaniego
SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. - Director
 Amphos 21
Av. Primavera 785, Int. 201,
Urb. Chacarilla - San Borja,
Lima 41, Perú
Telf. +51 1 5921275
www.amphos21.com

CONSENT OF DAVID ARCOS BOSCH

I, David Arcos Bosch, in connection with the filing of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2021 (the “Annual Report”), consent to:

● the public filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary Pre-Feasibility Study for El Brocal” with an effective date of
March 15, 2022 (the “Technical Report Summary”), as an exhibit to and referenced in the Annual Report;
● the use of and reference to our name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in S-K 1300), in connection with the Annual Report
and the Technical Report Summary; and
● the information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from those sections of the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, for which David Arcos
Bosch is co-responsible that is included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.

This consent pertains to the following sections of the Technical Report Summary:

● Section 13.1.2

Dated this 6 day of May, 2022.

Name: David Arcos Bosch, PhD. Geological Engineer, EurGeol (Reg. 1186) Title: Qualified Person, Senior Geologist and Geochemist consultant
 Amphos 21
Av. Primavera 785, Int. 201,
Urb. Chacarilla - San Borja,
Lima 41, Perú
Telf. +51 1 5921275
www.amphos21.com

CONSENT OF EDUARDO RUIZ DELGADO

I, Eduardo Ruiz Delgado, in connection with the filing of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2021 (the “Annual Report”), consent to:

● the public filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary Pre-Feasibility Study for El Brocal” with an effective date of March 15, 2022
(the “Technical Report Summary”), as an exhibit to and referenced in the Annual Report;
● the use of and reference to our name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in S-K 1300), in connection with the Annual Report and the Technical
Report Summary; and
● the information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from those sections of the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, for which Eduardo Ruiz Delgado is co-
responsible that is included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.

This consent pertains to the following sections of the Technical Report Summary:

● Section 13.1.2

Dated this 6 day of May, 2022.

Name: Eduardo Ruiz Delgado, MSc Geological Engineer, EurGeol (Reg. 1234) Title: Qualified Person, Senior Water Resources Consultant
 CONSENT

I, Manuel A. Hernández, a “qualified person” for purposes of Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“S-K
1300”). In connection with Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2021 and any
amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively, the “Form 20-F”), consent to:

● the public filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary Pre-Feasibility Study for El Brocal” (the “Technical Report
Summary”), with an effective date of March 15, 2022, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Company’s Form 20-F;

● the use of and references to my name, including my status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in S-K 1300), in connection with the Form 20-F and
any such Technical Report Summary; and

● the use of information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was prepared by me, that I
supervised the preparation of and/or that was reviewed and approved by me, that is included or incorporated by reference in the Form 20-F.

I am a qualified person responsible for authoring, and this consent pertains to, the following sections of the Technical Report Summary:

● Section 1.3.11, 16 and 22.8

Signature of Authorized Person

Name: Manuel A. Hernández Fellow AusIMM - Member 306576
Title: Civil Mining Engineer

 Rafael Santiago Luna, PE (Civil - California)

Golder Associates Peru S.A.

Av. La Paz 1049 Piso 7 Miraflores, Lima, Peru

CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON

I, Rafael Santiago Luna, MSc, PE, state that I am responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of
Section 15.2 of the technical report summary titled SEC Technical Report Summary Pre-Feasibility Study for El Brocal with an effective date of 15/03/2022 as signed and certified by
me (the “Technical Report Summary”).

Furthermore, I state that:

(a) I consent to the public filing of the Technical Report Summary by Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.;
(b) the document that the Technical Report Summary supports is the Company’s 20-F of Buenaventura for fiscal year 2021 (the “Document”);
(c) I consent to the use of my name in the Document, to any quotation from or summarization in the Document of the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am
responsible, and to the filing of the Technical Report Summary as an exhibit to the Document; and
(d) I confirm that I have read the Document, and that the Document fairly and accurately reflects, in the form and context in which it appears, the information in the parts of the
Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible.

Dated at Lima, Peru this 06 of May, 2022.

Professional Seal / Stamp

Signature of Qualified Person

Rafael Santiago Luna, PE (Civil – California)

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page vii

Table of Contents
1 Executive Resume 1
1.1 Summary 1
1.1.1 Conclusions 1
1.1.2 Recommendations 4
1.2 Economic Analysis 5
1.3 Technical Summary 5
1.3.1 Property Description 6
1.3.2 Land tenure 6
1.3.3 History 6
1.3.4 Geological and Mineralization 6
1.3.5 Exploration Status 7
1.3.6 Mineral Resources Estimates 7
1.3.7 Mineral Reserve Estimates 9
1.3.8 Mining Methods 11
1.3.9 Mineral Processing 11
1.3.10 Infrastructure 12
1.3.11 Market Studies 12
1.3.12 Environmental Studies, Permitting, and Plans, Negotiations, or Agreements with Local Individuals or Groups 13
1.3.13 Capital and Operating Costs 14
1.3.14 Economic Analysis 15
2 Introduction 17
2.1 Registrant for Whom the Technical Report Summary was Prepared 17
2.2 Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report 17
2.3 Sources of Information 17
2.4 Details of Inspection 17
2.5 Report Version Update 18
3 Property Description 19
3.1 Property Location 19
3.2 Property Area 19
3.3 Mineral Title, Claim, Mineral Right, Lease or Option Disclosure 20
3.4 Mineral Rights Description and How They Were Obtained 21
3.5 Encumbrances 23
3.6 Other Significant Factors and Risk 24
3.7 Royalties or Similar Interest 24
4 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography 25

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page viii

4.1 Topography, Elevation and Vegetation 25

4.2 Means of Access 25
4.3 Climate and Length of Operating Season 25
4.4 Infrastructure Availability and Sources 25
4.4.1 Water 25
4.4.2 Electricity 26
4.4.3 Personnel 26
4.4.4 Supplies 27
5 History 28
6 Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit 30
6.1 Regional, Local and Property Geology 30
6.2 Local Geology 31
6.2.1 Metamorphic rocks 31
6.2.2 Sedimentary Rocks 32
6.2.3 Volcanic Rocks 33
6.2.4 Intrusive rocks 33
6.2.5 Quaternary Deposits (Q) 34
6.2.6 Structural Context 35
6.2.7 Property Geology 36
6.2.8 Structural Geology 39
6.3 Alteration 41
6.4 Mineralization 41
6.5 High sulfidation Au-(Ag) epithermal. 41
6.5.1 Cordilleran Epithermal 41
6.5.2 Temporal evolution of mineralization at Colquijirca 45
6.6 Deposit Type 48
6.7 Cordilleran Deposits 48
7 Exploration 51
7.1 Exploration Work (Other Than Drilling) 51
7.1.1 Geological Mapping 51
7.1.2 Geophysics 51
7.2 Significant Results and Interpretation 53
7.3 Exploration Drilling 53
7.3.1 Drilling Surveys 54
7.3.2 Sampling Methods and Sample Quality 55
7.3.3 Downhole Surveying 56
7.3.4 Geological Logging 56
7.3.5 Diamond Drilling Sampling 56
7.3.6 Drilling Type and Extent 56
7.3.7 Drilling, Sampling, or Recovery Factors 56

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page ix

8 Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security 57

8.1 Sample Preparation Methods and Quality Control Measures 57
8.1.1 Sampling 57
8.1.2 Sample Preparation 57
8.1.3 Chain of Custody 59
8.2 Sample Preparation, Assaying and Analytical Procedures 59
8.2.1 Sample Analysis 60
8.3 Quality Control Procedures/Quality Assurance 61
8.3.1 Insertion Rate 61
8.3.2 Evaluation of Control Samples 61
8.4 Opinion on Adequacy 63
8.5 Non-Conventional Industry Practice 63
9 Data Verification 64
9.1 Internal data validation 64
9.2 External data validation 64
9.3 Data Verification Procedures 64
9.3.1 Database Validation 65
9.3.2 Assay Validation 65
9.4 Limitations 66
9.5 Opinions and recommendations on database quality 66
10 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing 67
10.1 Ore Supply 67
10.2 Sample Representativeness 70
10.3 Plant 2, Lead and Zinc Ore 74
10.4 Metallurgical Testing 79
10.5 Conclusions and Recommendations 82
11 Mineral Resources Estimates 85
11.1 Key Assumptions, Parameters, and Methods used 85
11.2 Database 85
11.3 Geological Model and Estimation Domains 86
11.3.1 Lithological and Structural Model 86
11.3.2 Grade Shells and Domaining 88
11.4 Exploratory Data Analysis 91
11.4.1 Compositing and Capping 91
11.4.2 Continuity Analysis: Variogram 95
11.5 Mineral Resources Estimates 99
11.5.1 Block Model 99
11.5.2 Grade Interpolation and parameters 99
11.5.3 Model Validation 102
11.5.4 Bulk Density 110

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page x

11.5.5 Mineral Resources Classification 112

11.5.6 Reconciliation 118
11.5.7 Cut-off grade estimates 119
11.5.8 Reasonable Potential for Economic Extraction (RPEE) 121
11.5.9 Uncertainty in the Mineral Resources Estimation 125
11.5.10 Summary Mineral Resources 125
11.5.11 Mineral Resources Sensitivity 127
12 Mineral Reserve Estimates 129
12.1 Open Pit Mineral Reserves 129
12.1.1 Introduction 129
12.1.2 Key Assumptions, Parameters, and Methods Used 129
12.1.3 Mining Dilution and Mining Recovery 131
12.1.4 Cut Off Grades 132
12.2 Underground Mineral Reserves 133
12.2.1 Introduction 133
12.2.2 Key Assumptions, Parameters, and Methods Used 133
12.2.3 Mining Dilution and Mining Recovery 135
12.2.4 Cut Off Grades 136
12.3 Metallurgical Recovery 137
12.4 NSR Block value 142
12.5 Material Risks Associated with the Modifying Factors 143
12.6 Mineral Reserves Statement 144
13 Mining Methods 147
13.1 Parameters Relevant to Mine Designs and Plans 147
13.1.1 Geotechnical 150
13.1.2 Hydrogelogical 172
13.2 Production Rates, Expected Mine Life, Mining Unit Dimensions, and Mining Dilution and Recovery Factors 175
13.2.1 Open Pit 175
13.2.2 Production schedule/phases 175
13.2.3 Project life 178
13.2.4 Mining unit dimensions (dimensions of benches and berms) 178
13.2.5 Underground Mine 180
13.3 Requirements for Stripping, Underground Development, and Backfilling 182
13.3.1 Open Pit 182
13.3.2 Underground 193
13.4 Required Mining Equipment Fleet and Machinery 198
13.4.1 Open pit mining equipment 198
13.4.2 Underground mining equipment 199
13.5 Final Mine Outline Map 199

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xi

13.5.1 General arrangement open pit and underground mining component 199
13.5.2 Isometric and longitudinal plans 201
14 Recovery Methods 202
14.1 Plant 1 - Copper Ore 202
14.1.1 Ore Delivery 202
14.1.2 Plant 1 – Crushing Stage 203
14.1.3 Plant 1 – Grinding & Classification 203
14.1.4 Plant 1 – Flotation & Regrinding 203
14.1.5 Plant 1 – Concentrate Thickening & Filtration 204
14.1.6 Plant 1 – Final Tails 204
14.1.7 Plant 1, Operational Performance 205
14.2 Plant 2, Lead and Zinc Ore 211
14.2.1 Plant 2 – Crushing, Washing & Classification Stage 213
14.2.2 Plant 2 – Grinding and Flotation, Coarse Fraction 213
14.2.3 Plant 2 – Lead Concentrate Thickening & Filtration 214
14.2.4 Plant 2 – Zinc Flotation Circuit 214
14.2.5 Plant 2 – Zinc Concentrate Thickening & Filtration 214
14.2.6 Plant 2 – Flotation, Fines Fraction 214
14.2.7 Plant 2 – Flotation, Ultrafines Fraction 215
14.2.8 Plant 2 – Operational Performance 215
14.3 Conclusions & Recommendations 220
15 Infrastructure 222
15.1 Waste Rock Management Facility 222
15.2 Tailings Management Facility 223
15.2.1 Huachuacaja tailings management facility and ancillary facilities 223
15.3 Mine Operations Support Facilities 239
15.3.1 Portal Access 239
15.3.2 Underground Workshop 239
15.3.3 Mine Administration Building 239
15.3.4 Other facilities 239
15.4 Processing Plant Support Facilities 239
15.4.1 Laboratory 239
15.5 First-Aid Facility 239
15.6 Man Camp 240
15.7 Power Supply and Distribution 240
15.8 Water Supply 240
15.8.1 Water Source 240
15.8.2 Domestic Water Treatment Plant 240
15.9 Waste Water Treatment and Solid Water Disposal 241
15.9.1 Waste Water Treatment 241

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xii

15.9.2 Solid Waste Disposal 241

16 Market Studies 242
16.1 El Brocal markets 242
16.1.1 Copper market 242
16.1.2 Zinc market 247
16.1.3 Lead & silver markets 252
16.2 El Brocal products 260
16.2.1 Summary of El Brocal products 260
16.2.2 Cu concentrate 262
16.2.3 Zn concentrate 263
16.2.4 Pb concentrate 264
17 Environmental Studies, Permitting, and Plans, Negotiations, or Agreements with Local Individuals or Groups 266
17.1 Environmental Study Results 266
17.2 Project permitting requirements, the status of any permit applications, and any known requirements to post performance or reclamation bonds 267
17.2.1 Other permits required by other sectoral authorities. 267
17.2.2 Mining operating permits issued by sectoral mining authorities. 268
17.3 Mine closure plans, including remediation and reclamation plans, and associated costs 269
17.4 Social relations, commitments, and agreements with individuals and local groups. 269
17.5 Mine Reclamation and Closure 270
17.5.1 Closure Planning 270
17.5.2 Closure Cost Estimate 272
17.5.3 Limitations on the Current Closure Plan and Cost Estimate 274
17.5.4 Material Omissions from the Closure Plan and Cost Estimate 274
17.6 Adequacy of Plans 276
17.6.1 Environmental 276
17.6.2 Local Individuals and Groups 277
17.6.3 Mine Closure 277
17.7 Commitments to Ensure Local Procurement and Hiring 279
17.7.1 Commitments to ensure the hiring of local labor 279
17.7.2 Commitments to ensure local procurement 279
18 Capital and Operating Costs 281
18.1 Capital and Operating Cost Estimates 281
18.1.1 Operating Costs 281
18.1.2 Capital Costs 282
18.1.3 Closure Cost 282
18.2 Basis and Accuracy Level for Cost Estimates 284
18.2.1 Basis and Premises for operating cost 284
18.2.2 Basis and Premises for capital cost 285

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xiii

19 Economic Analysis 286

19.1 General Description 286
19.1.1 Financial Model Parameters 286
19.1.2 External Factors 286
19.1.3 Technical Factors 288
19.2 Results 291
19.3 Sensitivity Analysis 293
20 Adjacent Properties 294
21 Other Relevant Data and Information 295
22 Interpretation and Conclusions 296
22.1 Geology & Exploration 296
22.2 QA/QC & Data verification 296
22.3 Mineral processing 297
22.4 Mineral Resource estimates 297
22.5 Mining methods 298
22.6 Recovery methods 298
22.7 Infrastructure 299
22.8 Market studies 300
22.9 Environmental studies & Permitting 300
23 Recommendations 302
23.1 Geological Setting, mineralization and Deposit 302
23.2 Mineral Resources 302
23.3 Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security 302
23.4 Data Verification 302
23.5 Mining and Mineral Reserves 302
23.6 Environmental, Permitting, and Social Considerations 303
23.7 Capital and Operating Costs 303
24 References 304
25 Reliance on Information Provided by the Registrant 305
25.1 Introduction 305
25.2 Macroeconomic Trends 305
25.3 Markets 305
25.4 Legal Matters 305
25.5 Environmental Matters 305
25.6 Stakeholder Accommodations 306
25.7 Governmental Factors 306

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xiv

List of Tables
Table 1-1: Summary of Mineral Resources 7
Table 1-2: El Brocal Underground Summary Mineral Reserve Statement as of December 31st, 2021 9
Table 1-3: El Brocal Open Pit Summary Mineral Reserve Statement as of December 31st, 2021 10
Table 1-4: Summary estimates cost 14
Table 1-5: Summary of total closure costs 15
Table 1-6: Indicative Economic Results 16
Table 2-1: Site Visits 18
Table 3-1: Information on the concessions of El Brocal mining property. 21
Table 4-1: Electrical Energy Source 26
Table 4-2: Direct employees classified by type of hiring and gender 26
Table 4-3: Direct employees classified by type of professional category 26
Table 7-1: Table DDH campaigns in El Brocal 54
Table 8-1: Distribution of samples analyzed according to the laboratory and sampling period 59
Table 8-2: Analytical methods used at El Brocal Internal Laboratory 60
Table 8-3: Analytical methods used at CERTIMIN External Laboratory 60
Table 8-4: El Brocal Control Sample Insertion Rate. 61
Table 8-5: Observations found in the QC analysis. 62
Table 9-1: Summary of drilling information provided by Buenaventura. 65
Table 9-2: Database validation summary 65
Table 9-3: Observations found in the Assay Cross Validation 65
Table 10-1: El Brocal, Mill Feed Sourcing, 2017 to 2020 November Period 67
Table 10-2-: El Brocal, Mill Feed Composition by Period 68
Table 10-3: Operating Time and Throughput 71
Table 10-4: Plant 1´s Overall Performance 71
Table 10-5: Plant 2, Operating time and Throughput 76
Table 10-6: Plant 2´s Overall Performance 77
Table 11-1: Statistics of the El Brocal Original Data 85
Table 11-2: El Brocal domains used in the estimation. 89
Table 11-3: Statistics of Zinc Grade Shell Model Indicators 90
Table 11-4: Cu, Pb and Zn Capping Values Applied in El Brocal. 92
Table 11-5: Statical comparison before and after capping of Pb in domain 32 (Capping: 4.5%) 93
Table 11-6: Statistical comparison between uncomposited data and composited data for copper (%) in domain 3. 94
Table 11-7: Summary of statistics composited data in main domains for copper, zinc and lead. 94
Table 11-8: Summary of Cu, Pb and Zn Variogram Model Parameters 98
Table 11-9: Brocal Block Model detail. 99
Table 11-10: Cu, Pb and Zn Estimation Parameters 100
Table 11-11: Verification of the Global Bias in Cu Domains of El Brocal Mine 104

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xv

Table 11-12: Verification of the Global Bias in El Brocal Pb Domains 105

Table 11-13: Verification of the Global Bias in El Brocal Zn Domains 105
Table 11-14: El Brocal density measurement after statistical evaluation. 111
Table 11-15: Summary of aspect to be evaluated in confident limit analysis 113
Table 11-16: Calculation of A90% and Q90% based for each drilling mesh for Zinc zone 113
Table 11-17: Calculation of A90% and Q90% based for each drilling mesh for Zinc zone 113
Table 11-18: Risk Associated to the Information and Estimation Results 116
Table 11-19: Summary of Values that will be Used in the Classification 117
Table 11-20: Reconciliation for 2020 and 2021 Periods 119
Table 11-21: Cost structure for El Brocal resources (open pit) 120
Table 11-22: Cost structure for El Brocal resources (underground) 121
Table 11-23: Parameters used for RPEE evaluation. 122
Table 11-24: Metallurgical recoveries functions for El Brocal 122
Table 11-25: Cut-Off differentiated by Mining Method 124
Table 11-26: Zn-Pb Mineral Resources Statement, Open Pit, El Brocal Mine, Department of Pasco - Peru, December 31, 2021. 126
Table 11-27: Cu Mineral Resources Statement, Open Pit, El Brocal Mine, Departament of Pasco - Peru, December 31, 2021. 126
Table 11-28: Cu Mineral Resources Statement, Underground Mine, El Brocal, Department of Pasco - Peru, December 31, 2021. 126
Table 12-1: Lerchs & Grossmann Optimization Parameters 129
Table 12-2: OP in-situ dilution values 131
Table 12-3: OP NSR cut-off Input parameters 133
Table 12-4: OP NSR cut-off value 133
Table 12-5: Underground in-situ dilution values 135
Table 12-6: NSR cut-off Input parameters for underground operations 136
Table 12-7: NSR cut-off value for underground operations 136
Table 12-8: El Brocal processing plants and products 137
Table 12-9: Metallurgical recovery functions - Copper Concentrate 138
Table 12-10: Metallurgical recovery functions - Lead Concentrate 140
Table 12-11: Metallurgical recovery functions - Zinc Concentrate 141
Table 12-12: Metal Prices for mineral reserves definition 143
Table 12-13: Estimated unit value by metal and type of concentrate 143
Table 12-14: El Brocal Underground Summary Mineral Reserve Statement as of December 31st, 2021 145
Table 12-15: El Brocal Open Pit Summary Mineral Reserve Statement as of December 31st, 2021 146
Table 13-1: El Brocal Cu-Ag ore reserves report 149
Table 13-2: El Brocal Pb-Zn ore reserves report 150
Table 13-3: Summary of soft material properties 152
Table 13-4: Summary of rock mass properties 153
Table 13-5: Mining methods by sector 160

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xvi

Table 13-6: RMR’76 statistics by geotechnical sectors. 161

Table 13-7: Dimension of stopes for ELOS=0.5 m and RMR > 60 (II) 166
Table 13-8: Dimension of stopes for ELOS=0.5 m and RMR 50-60 (IIIa) 167
Table 13-9: Maximum span (m) for stopes dome 167
Table 13-10: Dimension of stopes for ELOS=0.5 m, RMR > 60 (II) 170
Table 13-11: Dimension of stopes for an ELOS=0.5 m, RMR 50 to 60 (IIIa) 170
Table 13-12: Dimension of stopes for an ELOS=0.5 m, RMR 40 to 50 (IIIb) 170
Table 13-13: Dimension of stopes for an ELOS=0.5 m, RMR 30 to 40 (IVa) 171
Table 13-14: Cemented backfill strength required for underground mining 172
Table 13-15: Tajo Sur (Cu-Ag ore) open pit mining plan 176
Table 13-16: Tajo Norte & Tajo Sur (Pb-Zn ore) open pit mining plan 177
Table 13-17: Insitu dilution values 179
Table 13-18: Marcapunta (Cu-Ag ore) underground mining plan 181
Table 13-19: Stripping ratio report by phase 184
Table 13-20: Characteristic of the triangular section gutter 185
Table 13-21: Details the characteristics of the section 187
Table 13-22: Characteristics of the pumping equipment in the open pit 191
Table 13-23: San Martin contractor company’s equipments 198
Table 13-24: Smelter contractor company’s equipments 198
Table 13-25: Ecosarc contractor company' equipments 198
Table 13-26: Underground mining equipment 199
Table 14-1: Plant 1 – Copper Ore 2017 – 2020 Monthly Production Results 206
Table 14-2: Plant 1, Throughput Variability as Function of Grinding P80 208
Table 14-3: El Brocal, Plant 2 – Overall Operational Results 2017 – 2020 216
Table 14-4: Plant 2, Throughput Variability v/s Grinding P80 217
Table 15-1: Summary of Geotechnical Investigation 229
Table 15-2: Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility Heightening Schedule. 231
Table 15-3: Results of Physical Stability Analyses of the Huachuacaja Tailings Dam. 234
Table 15-4: Specifications for Placement and Compaction of Dam Materials 236
Table 15-5: Geotechnical Instrumentation Monitoring Frequency. 238
Table 16-1: Copper LME cash prices 2021 – 2036 (US$/t) 247
Table 16-2: Zinc LME cash prices 2021 – 2036 (US$/t) 252
Table 16-3: Lead LME cash prices 2021 – 2036, US$/t 257
Table 16-4: Silver prices 2021 - 2036, US$/oz 260
Table 16-5: Typical specifications of El Brocal’s concentrates 261
Table 17-1: UM El Brocal closure cost comparison 273
Table 17-2: post-closure approved closure plan and update (2021) 273
Table 17-3: Water Treatment Capex 276
Table 17-4: Total Water Treatment Costs Annual Summary 276
Table 18-1: Operating cost estimate 281

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xvii

Table 18-2: Capital cost estimation 282

Table 18-3: Closure Cost 283
Table 18-4: Operational parameters 285
Table 19-1: Financial Model Parameters 286
Table 19-2: Metal Prices forecast 287
Table 19-3: El Brocal Mining Summary 288
Table 19-4: Reference unit cost for Yearly cost calculation 289
Table 19-5: Yearly material movement (tonnage) 290
Table 19-6: Yearly incremental (Bench) cost - Ore & Waste 290
Table 19-7: Yearly Cost (No contingency) 290
Table 19-8: Yearly cost (Including contingency 10%) 290
Table 19-9: Summary of Corporate Costs 291
Table 19-10: Yearly capital costs 291
Table 19-11: Indicative Economic Results 291
Table 19-12: Cashflow Analysis on an Annualized Basis 292

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xviii

List of Figures
Figure 3-1 Location map of El Brocal mine, which comprises the deposits of Colquijirca, Marcapunta, and San Gregorio. 19
Figure 3-2: Map of El Brocal mining operations and concentrator plant. 20
Figure 3-3: El Brocal mining claims 21
Figure 6-1: Geology and main mining centers in the Cerro de Pasco sector, central Andes of Peru. 30
Figure 6-2: Magmatic arcs of the Cerro de Pasco (22-k) quadrangle. 31
Figure 6-3: Geologic map of the Colquijirca Mining District, showing the sectors: Tajo Norte, Tajo Sur and Marcapunta. 35
Figure 6-4: Geologic map of the diatreme-dome complex at Cerro de Pasco 37
Figure 6-5: The geologic and lithostratigraphic map of Tajo Colquijirca. 38
Figure 6-6: Geologic and structural map of North Pit - Marcapunta. 40
Figure 6-7: Alunite samples from the Colquijirca zone. 42
Figure 6-8: Block diagram illustrating the spatial relationships between the Oro Marcapunta high sulfidation epithermal Au-(Ag) mineralization and the
Marcapunta Oeste, Smelter and Colquijirca Cordilleran base metal deposits 43
Figure 6-9: Mineralogy of Colquijirca deposit. 45
Figure 6-10: Paragenetic sequence for the first stage of mineralization (including observations by Bowditch 1935, Lacy 1949, and Einaudi 1968, 1977). 46
Figure 6-11: Paragenetic sequence of Cordilleran base metal replacement ore bodies. 47
Figure 6-12: Paragenetic sequence of second-stage veins hosted in the diatreme breccia. 48
Figure 6-13: Schematic cross section of the Colquijirca district showing the spatial and temporal distribution of the different deposit types 49
Figure 7-1: Image of the Marcapunta topography 52
Figure 7-2: Image of the residual complete Bouguer gravity for the Marcapunta Project. 53
Figure 7-3: Property Drill Collar Location (2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 campaigns) 55
Figure 8-1: Sample Preparation Diagram 58
Figure 10-1: El Brocal, Fresh Ore Destination and Final Products 67
Figure 10-2: Marcapunta Ore Production 69
Figure 10-3: Marcapunta Ore Allocation to Plant 1 and Plant 2 69
Figure 10-4: Tajo Norte Ore Production 70
Figure 10-5: Simplified Block Flow Diagram, Plant 1 71
Figure 10-6: Plant 1’s Overall Performance 73
Figure 10-7: Plant 1 – Daily Performance – Throughput and Grinding P80 74
Figure 10-8: Plant 1, Throughput versus Grinding P80 74
Figure 10-9: Simplified Block Flow Diagram, Plant 2 75
Figure 10-10: Plant 2´s Overall Performance 78
Figure 10-11: Plant 2 – Daily Performance – Throughput and Grinding P80 78
Figure 10-12: Plant 1, Throughput versus Grinding P80 79
Figure 10-13: Metallurgical Testing 2021, Sample´s Location 79
Figure 10-14: Marcapunta, 2021 Composite’s Mineral Composition 80
Figure 10-15: Marcapunta, 2021 Composite´s Overall Mineral Composition 80

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xix

Figure 10-16: Marcapunta, 2021 Composite’s Mineral Composition 81

Figure 10-17: Tajo Norte Mineralogical Composition 82
Figure 10-18: Tajo Norte, 2021 Composite’s Overall Mineral Composition 82
Figure 11-1: 3D View of El Brocal Lithological Model 87
Figure 11-2: 3D View of El Brocal Modeled Structures 88
Figure 11-3: 3D View of medium-grade envelop (yellow) and High-grade (red) within the “Calera Medio Favorable” Unit (Cal_Mid_Fav). 90
Figure 11-4: Cross Section of the Zinc Grade Envelop in domain cal_mid_fav 90
Figure 11-5: Top-Cut analysis of Pb in domain 32. 93
Figure 11-6: Cu Modeled Variogram within Domain 62/63. 95
Figure 11-7: Zn Modeled Variogram within Domain 32/33. 96
Figure 11-8: Pb Modeled Variogram within Domain 52/53. 96
Figure 11-9: Cross Validation for Domain 42, 43 for Zinc. 102
Figure 11-10: Visual Validation of the Cu (%) Grade Model Versus the Grade in the Drillholes 103
Figure 11-11: Visual Validation of the Pb (%) Grade Model Versus the Grade in the Drillholes 103
Figure 11-12: Visual Validation of the Zn (%) Grade Model Versus the Grade in the Drillholes 104
Figure 11-13: Swath Plots Comparing Estimation of Cu OK Versus Cu NN in the Three Dimensions, in the Domain 62. 107
Figure 11-14: Swath Plots Comparing Estimation of Pb OK Versus Pb NN in the Three Directions, in the Domain 32. 108
Figure 11-15: Swath Plots Comparing Estimation of Zn OK Versus Zn NN in the Three Directions, in Domain 52. 109
Figure 11-16: Influence limit to classify the El Brocal resources 112
Figure 11-17: Plot of space vs error for Zn zone 114
Figure 11-18: Plot of space vs error for Cu zone 114
Figure 11-19: Limits about the QAQC risk based in performance of results 115
Figure 11-20: Limits about the structural model risk based in confidence information and results 116
Figure 11-21: Resources Classification process 118
Figure 11-22: Schematic graph of Room and Pillar with long holes and Sub Level Stopping. 125
Figure 11-23: Grade-Tonnage Curve for measured and indicated Mineral Resources for Open Pit (Zinc Zone). 128
Figure 11-24: Grade-Tonnage Curve for measured and indicated Mineral Resources for Open Pit (Copper Zone). 128
Figure 11-25: Grade-Tonnage Curve for measured and indicated Mineral Resources for Underground. 128
Figure 12-1: Design recommendations for open pit design 2020 130
Figure 12-2: Ore envelope and dilution application criterion 132
Figure 12-3: Cu recovery in Copper Concentrate 138
Figure 12-4: Ag recovery in Copper Concentrate 139
Figure 12-5: Au recovery in Copper Concentrate 139
Figure 12-6: Pb recovery in Lead Concentrate 140
Figure 12-7: Ag recovery in Lead Concentrate 141

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xx

Figure 12-8: Zn recovery in Zinc Concentrate (Fe <= 9.6%) 142

Figure 12-9: Ag recovery in Zinc Concentrate 142
Figure 13-1: El Brocal deposit mineralization zoning 147
Figure 13-2: Distribution of El Brocal mining operations 148
Figure 13-3: Underground mining scheme in El Brocal 149
Figure 13-4: Lithological model 2021 projected in the design of the El Brocal open pit. 151
Figure 13-5: Nonlinear failure envelope for backfill material 152
Figure 13-6: Main faults in the El Brocal structural model 153
Figure 13-7: Definition of structural domains in the El Brocal pit 154
Figure 13-8: Design sectors for stability analysis of El Brocal pit 155
Figure 13-9: Example of stability analysis. Section S2 for the sector of the same name 155
Figure 13-10: Design recommendations for open pit design 2020 156
Figure 13-11: Simulation of open pit mining to identify critical sectors 158
Figure 13-12: Section 6 - maximum shear isocontours under static conditions 158
Figure 13-13: Projected 2020 reserves with open pit design 159
Figure 13-14: East view of 2020 reserves with open pit projection 159
Figure 13-15: Geotechnical analysis sectors 161
Figure 13-16: Structural domains defined for the El Brocal mine 162
Figure 13-17: Major faults in the underground mine 163
Figure -13-18: Plan view of El Brocal mine’s current mining area 164
Figure 13-19: Rib pillar stresses vs. rock type failure criteria 165
Figure 13-20: Stability retro-analysis of El Brocal south area mining stopes 165
Figure 13-21: Typical support section in the long-hole room and pillar method 168
Figure 13-22: Profile view looking north of the north mining sector. 169
Figure 13-23: Typical mining section for rib pillar recovery with cemented backfill. 169
Figure 13-24: Typical support section in the dome of primary and secondary stopes 171
Figure 13-25: Annual average estimates of pit and underground inflow 173
Figure 13-26: Proposed pit dewatering sector 174
Figure 13-27: Design parameters (bench, berm, y ramp) 178
Figure 13-28: Optimum turning radius 178
Figure 13-29: Loading wide area 179
Figure 13-30: Ore envelope and dilution application criterion. 180
Figure 13-31: Sequence of mining phases 183
Figure 13-32: Detail of triangular gutter design 185
Figure 13-33: Location from the gutters with priority in the haul roads 186
Figure 13-34: Section typical on sidewalks 187
Figure 13-35: Detail of trapezoidal gutter design 187
Figure 13-36: Gutters coated with geomembrane on the north side of the open pit 188
Figure 13-37: Location of the gutters on Condorcayan dump 188
Figure 13-38: View the waterproofing gutter on the perimeter of the South dump 189

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xxi

Figure 13-39: Location of the perimetral and crowning gutter of the South dump 190
Figure 13-40: Location of drainage wells on the open pit 191
Figure 13-41: “El Metropolitano” water storage and pumping station, level 4294 192
Figure 13-42: Poza on the bottom of the open pit, temporarily located at level 4150 192
Figure 13-43: "Poza la Llave" pumping station, located at level 4250 193
Figure 13-44: 3D view of the scheme of sublevel stoping mining method with continuous pillars 195
Figure 13-45: Plan view of the scheme of sublevel stoping mining method with continuous pillars 195
Figure 13-46: Profile view of the scheme of sublevel stoping mining method with continuous pillars. 196
Figure 13-47: Profile view of the scheme of sublevel stoping mining method with continuous pillars, leaving a bridge pillar in the areas where it has been
mined with chambers and pillars in the upper part. 196
Figure 13-48: Profile view of the scheme of the sublevel stoping mining method with continuous pillars, leaving shield pillars so as not to affect the main
extraction access galleries. 197
Figure 13-49: Profile view of the scheme detrital fill 197
Figure 13-50: Disposition of the main components of open pit and underground mining operations 200
Figure 13-51: Longitudinal view of open pit and underground mining operations 201
Figure 14-1: El Brocal, Fresh Ore Destination and Final Products 202
Figure 14-2: Simplified Block Flow Diagram, Plant 1 204
Figure 14-3: El Brocal, Plant 1 Flowsheet 205
Figure 14-4: Plant 1, Ore Throughput v/s Grinding P80 209
Figure 14-5: Plant 1, Ore Throughput and Grinding P80 v/s time 209
Figure 14-6: Recovery to Concentrate v/s Ore Throughput, Monthly and Daily Basis 210
Figure 14-7: Head Grade Variability 2018 to 2020 210
Figure 14-8: Concentrate 1 Production versus Copper Head Grade 211
Figure 14-9: El Brocal, Plant 2 Simplified Block Flow Diagram 212
Figure 14-10: El Brocal, Plant 2 Detailed Flowsheet 212
Figure 14-11: Plant 2, Ore Throughput v/s Grinding P80 217
Figure 14-12: Plant 2, Grinding P80 Frequency Distribution 218
Figure 14-13: Plant 2, Ore Throughput & Grinding P80 v/s Time 218
Figure 14-14: Plant 2, Key Metallurgical Relationships 219
Figure 14-15: Plant 2, Recovery v/s P80 219
Figure 14-16: Plant 2, Concentrates Grade v/s P80 220
Figure 15-1: Condorcayan waste Dump 223
Figure 16-1: Copper demand by end-use product and sector 242
Figure 16-2: Copper value chain 243
Figure 16-3: Simplified Copper value chain 244
Figure 16-4: Copper supply-demand gap analysis, 2021 - 2036, kt 245
Figure 16-5: Copper Market Balance 2021 – 2026 (kt) 246
Figure 16-6: LME Copper cash prices, 2021-2036 (US$/t) 247
Figure 16-7: Global zinc demand by first-use sector and end-use sector 248
Figure 16-8: Zinc value chain 248

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xxii

Figure 16-9: Simplified zinc value chain 249

Figure 16-10: Zinc supply-demand gap analysis, 2021 - 2036, k 251
Figure 16-11: Zinc Market Balance 2021 – 2026 (kt) 251
Figure 16-12: LME zinc cash prices, 2021-2036 (US$/t) 252
Figure 16-13: Lead demand by end-use sector 253
Figure 16-14: Lead industrial value chain 253
Figure 16-15: Simplified lead value chain 254
Figure 16-16: Lead supply-demand gap analysis, 2021 - 2036, kt 256
Figure 16-17: Lead Market Balance 2021 – 2026 (kt) 256
Figure 16-18: LME cash lead prices 2021 – 2036, US$/t 257
Figure 16-19: Silver demand b end-use 257
Figure 16-20: Silver value chain 258
Figure 16-21: Silver supply-demand gap analysis, 2021 - 2036, kt 259
Figure 16-22: Silver Market Balance 2021 – 2026 (kt) 259
Figure 16-23: Silver price forecast, 2015 – 2036, US$/oz 260
Figure 16-24: Figure Sample boxplot 261
Figure 16-25: Copper concentrate of El Brocal mine 262
Figure 16-26: Zn concentrate of El Brocal mine 263
Figure 16-27: Pb concentrate of El Brocal mine 265
Figure 19-1: El Brocal Mining profile graphic 288
Figure 19-2: El Brocal Processing profile graphic 289
Figure 19-3: El Brocal NPV Sensitivity Analysis 293

APPENDICES

Appendix A: EDA
Appendix B: Compound EDA
Appendix C: Top cut
Appendix D: Envelopes
Appendix E: Variography
Appendix F: Estimation Parameters
Appendix G: Overall Bias

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xxiii

Abbreviations

[Metric]
The metric system has been used throughout this report.   Tonnes are metric of 1,000 kg, or 2,204.6 lb.   All currency is in U.S.  dollars (US$) unless otherwise
stated.
[US System]
The US System for weights and units has been used throughout this report.   Tonnes are reported in short tonnes of 2,000lbs.   All currency is in U.S.  dollars
(US$) unless otherwise stated.
To facilitate the reading of large numbers, commas are used to group the figures three by three starting from the comma or decimal point.

Abbreviation Unit or Term

% Percent
° Degree (degrees)
°C Degrees Centigrade
µm Micron or microns
A Ampere
A/m² Amperes per square meter
AA Atomic absorption
AASP Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy -Perchloric digestion Perchloric digestion
ABA Acid-base Accounting
acQuire Systematic database program
ADI Area of direct influence
Ag Silver
ANA National water authority
ANFO Ammonium nitrate fuel oil
Au Gold
AuEq Gold equivalent grade
Buenaventura Cía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
BVN Cía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
CCD Counter-current decantation
cfm Cubic feet per minute
CFW Close footwall
CHW Close hanging wall
CIL Carbon-in-leach
CIRA A certificate of non-existence of archeological remains
cm Centimeter
cm² Square centimeter
cm³ Cubic centimeter

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xxiv

CoG Cut-off grade

ConfC Confidence code
CRec Core recovery
CSS Closed-side setting
CTW Calculated true width
Cu Copper
DCR Design change request
DDH Diamond drill holes
dia. Diameter
EDA Exploratory Data Analysis
EIAd Estudio de Impacto. Ambiental detallado
EIS Environmental impact statement
El Brocal Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.
ELOS Equivalent linear overbreak/slough
EMP Environmental management plan
FA Fire assay
FAAAS Fire Assay - Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy finish
FCF Free Cash Flow
FI Field instructions
FOS Factor of Safety
ft Foot (feet)
ft2 Square foot (feet)
ft3 Cubic foot (feet)
FW Footwall
g Gram
g/L Gram per liter
g/t Grams per tonne
gal Gallon
g-mol Gram-mole
gpm Gallons per minute
GSI Geological strength index
GWI Ground water international
ha Hectares
HDPE Height density polyethylene
hp Horsepower
HTC Humidity cell leaching
HTW Horizontal true width
HVACR Heating,ventilation, air conditioning & refrigeration
HW Hanging wall
ICP Induced couple plasma
ID2 Inverse-distance squared
ID3 Inverse-distance cubed

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xxv

IFC International finance corporation

ILS Intermediate leach solution
Ingemmet Institute of Geology, Mining and Metallurgy
IRA Inter-ramp angles
IW Intermediate wall
kA Kiloamperes
kg Kilograms
km Kilometer
km² Square kilometer
koz Thousand troy ounce
kt Thousand tonnes
kt/d Thousand tonnes per day
kt/y Thousand tonnes per year
kV Kilovolt
kW Kilowatt
kWh Kilowatt-hour
kWh/t Kilowatt-hour per metric tonne
L Liter
L/sec Liters per second
L/sec/m Liters per second per meter
lb Pound
LHD Long-Haul Dump truck
LIMS Laboratory information management system
LLDDP Linear low density polyethylene plastic
LME London metal exchange
LOI Loss on ignition
LOM Life of the mine
m Meter
m.y. Million years
m² Square meter
m³ Cubic meter
MARN Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
MASL Meters above sea level
MCE Maximum credible earthquake
MCP Mine closure plan
MDA Mine development associates
mg/L Milligrams/liter
MINAM Ministry of Environment
MINEM Ministry of Energy and Mines
MJ Megajoules
mm Millimeter
mm² Square millimeter

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xxvi

mm³ Cubic millimeter

MME Mine & mill engineering
Moz Million troy ounces
Mt Million tonnes
MTW Measured true width
MW Million watts
NCR Non - conformities
NGO Non-governmental organization
NI 43-101 Canadian National Instrument 43-101
NSR Net Smelter Return
NYSE New York Stock Exchange
OEFA Environmental Evaluation and Oversight Agency
OP Open pit
ORE Orebody
OSC Ontario securities commission
Osinergmin Supervisory Agency for Investment in Energy and Mining
oz Troy ounce
PAMA Environmental Adjustment and Management Program
Pb Lead
PLC Programmable logic controller
PLS Pregnant leach solution
PMF Probable maximum flood
ppb Parts per billion
ppm Parts per million
PTARD Domestic wastewater treatment plants
Q Quaternary deposits
QA/QC Quality assurance/quality control
Q-al Alluvial deposits
Q-bo Wetland deposits
Q-co Colluvial deposits
Q-fg Fluvio-glacial Deposits
Q-g Glacial deposits
R&P Room & pillar
RC Rotary circulation drilling
RCs Refining costs
RDC Ruta de Cobre
RFI Request for information
RMR Rock mass rating
RoM Run-of-Mine
RQD Rock quality description
SEC U.S. securities & exchange commission
sec Second

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page xxvii

SENACE National environmental certification authority

SFE Short-term leaching by shake flask extraction
SG Specific gravity
SMEB Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.
SPT Standard penetration testing
SR Stripping ratio
SRK Srk consulting (peru) s.a.
st Short tonne (2,000 pounds)
SVR Surveillance reports
t Tonne (metric tonne) (2,204.6 pounds)
t/d Tonnes per day
t/h Tonnes per hour
t/y Tonnes per year
TC Treatment charge
TCs Treatment costs
Time Domain EM The geophysical methods used included electromagnetism
tpd Tons per day
TSF Tailing’s storage facility
TSP Total suspended particulates
UG Underground
UIT One tax unit
V Volts
VFD Variable frequency drive
W Watt
WRA Total rock chemical analysis
WWTPI Industrial wastewater treatment plant
XRD X-ray diffraction
y Year
Zn Zinc

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 1

1 Executive Resume

1.1 Summary
SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A., (SRK) was retained by Compañia de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.  to prepare an independent Technical Report Summary on the
El Brocal Mine, located in the Department of Pasco, Peru.  Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.  is a publicly traded company on the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE).  

This report was prepared as a PFS Technical Report Summary in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) S-K regulations (Title 17,
Part 229, Items 601 and 1300 until 1305) for Compañia de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.  (NYSE: BVN) by SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A.  (SRK) on the Technical
Report Summary for El Brocal (TRS)

The purpose of this Technical Report Summary is to report Mineral Resources, mineral reserves and exploration results.  

This report is based in part on internal Company technical reports, previous prefeasibility studies, maps, published government reports, company letters and
memoranda, and public information as cited throughout this report and listed in the References Section 24.

Reliance upon information provided by the registrant is listed in the Section 25 when applicable.

The Colquijirca - Marcapunta (El Brocal) production unit is owned by Sociedad Minera El Brocal SAA (61.00% Buenaventura), a subsidiary of Buenaventura.

Colquijirca Mining District has a long productive history dating back to pre-Inca, Inca, and colonial times, and has mainly focused on silver mining.  It was a key
producer of Ag and Bi during the first half of the 20th century (Buenaventura, 2021) and is currently one of the largest producers of Zn-Pb-Ag.

El Brocal is located in the district of Tinyahuarco, province of Cerro de Pasco, department of Pasco, Peru, at coordinates 10°45'8.9'' S and 76°16'21.8'' W, 289
km from Lima and 10 km from the city of Cerro de Pasco, at an altitude of approximately 4,300 MASL.  

Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.   conducts its mining operations using the open pit method at Tajo Norte mine (silver, lead, and zinc ores) and the
underground method at Marcapunta mine (copper ores).   The Marcapunta Oeste and San Gregorio are the Company’s most important exploration projects

El Brocal’s mineral processing facilities include two independent conventional flotation plants.   Plant 1, which processes copper ore, and Plant 2, which
processes lead and zinc ores.  Plant 1 receives ore from Marcapunta mine, and Plant 2 receives fresh ore from Tajo Norte mine and low silver content ore from
Marcapunta.  For the period 2017 to November 2020, the combined plants processed approximately 22.8 million tons of fresh ore, which is equivalent to an
average of 5.7 million per year or 15,600 tons per day (approximately) when considering 365 days per annum.   The plants’ combined nominal capacity is
18,000 tons per day.

1.1.1 Conclusions

SRK has the following conclusions by area.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 2

a. Geological and Mineral Resources

● Due to years of active mining, geology and mineralization are well understood and SRK has used relevant available data sources to integrate information
on long-term resource scale into the modeling effort for public reporting purposes.
● The geological setting, geophysical studies, surface samples, and geological mapping of the Colquijirca area present good exploration potential.
Marcapunta Sur Oeste and San Gregorio are the most important exploration projects.
● Protocols for drilling, sampling preparation and analysis, verification, and security meet industry-standard practices are appropriate for use in a Mineral
Resource estimate.
● The geological models are reasonably constructed using available geological information and are appropriate for Mineral Resources estimation.
● The assumptions, parameters, and methodology used for the El Brocal Mineral Resources estimate are appropriate for the style of mineralization and
proposed mining methods.
● The process to estimate the Mineral Resources of the El Brocal mine was conducted by SRK and Buenaventura.  A 3D geological model (lithological,
structural and mineralization bodies) was elaborated with several types of data (mainly drill holes, working mapping and section interpretation) to
constraint and control ore shapes and domains.
● Drilling data from cores were combined into geological structures, copper, zinc, lead, silver, gold, and iron grades were interpolated into block models for
the different mine zones using the Ordinary Kriging method in each domain. The results were visually validated through various statistical comparisons.
The estimate was sterilized with the previously extracted areas before the date of this report; classified in a manner consistent with industry standards;
and reviewed with Buenaventura.
● Mineral Resources have been reported using an optimized scenario (stopes and pit), based on operational and economic assumptions to support the
reasonable potential for economic extraction of the Mineral Resource. The cutoff has been calculated from economic parameters, and the resources
have been reported above this cutoff.
● For SRK, the Mineral Resources set forth herein are appropriate for public disclosure and meet the definitions of measured, indicated and inferred
resources established by SEC guidelines and industry standards (S-K 1300).

b. Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security

● SRK has conducted a comprehensive review of the available QA/QC data as part of the sample preparation, analysis, and security. SRK believes that
the QA/QC protocols are consistent with the best practices accepted in the industry.
● The sample preparation, chemical analysis and quality control procedures historically have shown that there may be issues with the accuracy and
precision of samples results to support the estimation of measured Mineral Resources and proven reserves, especially for areas characterized by
analyses at the El Brocal Internal Laboratory. Therefore, SRK has considered the QA/QC analysis results as a risk in the classification of Mineral
Resources and reduced the overall classification.

c. Data Verification
● SRK notes that the database has a minor quantity of inconsistencies, which primarily correspond to historical information obtained from data migration
and not deemed material to the disclosure of Mineral Resources.  SRK believes that the database is consistent and acceptable for Mineral Resources
Estimation.

d. Mining and Mineral Reserves

● In the SRK’s opinion the mineral reserves estimation is reasonable in the context of available technical studies, information provided by Buenaventura an
assessment

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 3

developed by SRK, however, SRK strongly recommend to monitoring the following risk aspects: identified by SRK: Mining dilution and mining recovery

● Currency exchange rate

● Production costs

● Geotechnical parameters
● Processing plant throughput

● Deleterious elements presence,

● Local politics

e. Mineral Processing
Plant 1’s operating time averaged 88.8%; it should operate in the 90% to 95% range, or even higher.
Arsenic in copper concentrate is high, ranging from 8% to 8.5% for both products.

Copper Concentrate 1 production bearing silver values represent the largest fraction, or approximately 99.6% of the approximately 180,000 t/year produced;
the balance, or 0.4%, was Copper Concentrate 2 with no declared silver content.

Currently Plant 2 process copper ore by campaigns of approximately 30 days/ year.

f. Environmental, Permitting, and Social Considerations

SRK has concluded that the main activities and components for mining and beneficiation at Colquijirca and Marcapunta Units have obtained statutory
Environmental Certifications. SRK has come to the same conclusion regarding the mine’s ancillary components. of the mine.

g. Capital and Operating Costs

In the SRK’s opinion, the operating cost estimation is reasonable in the context of LoM plan, premises, operational conditions, the information provided by
Buenaventura and the assessment developed by SRK. SRK considers that the use of historical record provides a good approximation of the reality of the
operation and allows for adequate projection of future costs.

Closure costs were estimated by SRK at +-25% accuracy level. In aspects where the technical information was not enough or due to the lack of technical
studies, allowances were considered to cover any unknown technical issue. In the SRK’s opinion, the closure cost is reasonable and reflects the reality of El
Brocal’s environmental conditions. The closure cost estimated by SRK looks to cover the requirements of local and international regulations. This cost is higher
than closure costs estimated by Buenaventura and presented to the local government entities

Capital cost expenditure was estimated by Buenaventura and in SRK’s best understanding, was estimated following best practices and in accordance with
conditions at El Brocal. SRK finds the amounts reasonable for the type and size of El Brocal’s operation. However, SRK cannot develop a detailed analysis of
the capital costs or provide support for the same.
SRK recommends monitoring the following aspects:

● Additional engineering studies related to the mine closure process,

● Monitor the currency exchange rate;

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 4

● Prepare support for the capital cost expenditure.

h. Economic Analysis
Based on the assumptions detailed in this report, the operation is forecasted to generate positive cashflow over the life of the reserves. This estimated cashflow
is inherently forward-looking and dependent upon numerous assumptions and forecasts, such as macroeconomic conditions, mine plans and operating
strategy, all of which are subject to change.

This yields an after-tax LoM NPV@ 7.77% of US$277M, of which US$169M is attributable to Buenaventura.

The analysis performed for this report indicates that the operation’s NPV is most sensitive to variations in commodity prices and in plant performance.

1.1.2 Recommendations

a. Geological Setting, mineralization and Deposit

● SRK recommends developing a detailed structural model to provide further support to the geologic modeling of the deposit.

b. Mineral Resources

● SRK recommends that systematic density sampling programs be carried out covering all ore bodies, adequately distributed along the length and height
of the veins.
● QAQC results throughout the life of the mine have not been optimal. SRK recommends that the quality control program be properly monitored. Internal
laboratory results over the last few months on Au and Cu show accuracy problems and potential problems on Ag. These inappropriate results
generated the non-declaration of measured resources in the southern zone.
● SRK strongly suggests that a feasibility-level structural model be developed throughout the mine, especially in the southern area. Currently, the low
confidence of the structural model means that the southern part does not have measured resources.
● SRK recommends implementing a reconciliation program where the different types of resource models, reserves, mine plans and plant results are
included.

c. Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security

SRK recommends frequently analyzing the results of control samples, particularly with regard to the precision and accuracy of the Internal Laboratory and
Certimin External Laboratory, to identify any inconsistencies and provide immediate solutions.

d. Data Verification

SRK recommends performing internal validations of the database; conducting periodic verification of the data export process; and issuing Internal Laboratory
analytical certificates for future estimations or audits.

e. Mining and Mineral Reserves

● Improvement of metallurgical recovery estimation by means of a continuous performance control of plant operations and development of additional
metallurgical tests. SRK considers that current formulas are coherent with the processing plants and represent the results of the process, however, it is
necessary to complete additional analysis.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 5

● Develop a definition of metallurgical recovery schema for ore materials that can produce a bulk concentrate (Cu, Pb, Ag) and incorporate it as part of
mineral reserves estimation.
● Improvement of “unit value” calculation by means the parameters traceability and adding some level of differentiation in the commercial terms, separating
commercial terms related to the metal or payable content and commercial terms related to mass of concentrate
● Improve the predictability of Arsenic contents in the saleable products of the LoM plan. And based on that the impact in trhe valuation of concentrates
and in-situ or.
● Geotechnical monitoring of open pit slopes and implement feedback process to incorporate the monitoring results to the geotechnical model used for pit
design purposes
● Implement a reconciliation process, following best practices of the industry. This process must be consider the involvement of areas: mine operations,
geology, mine planning and processing plant under an structured plan of implementation;

f. Environmental, Permitting, and Social Considerations

Achieve the goals programmed in the social management plan that were pending due to the Covid 19 restrictions.

g. Capital and Operating Costs

● Development of additional technical studies for the mine closure process and to improve the accuracy of cost estimation. SRK believes that there are
opportunities to improve and reduce the closure costs supported by technical studies;

● Continuous monitoring of cost results (yearly, quarterly); these results should be used as feedback on the operating and capital cost estimation.

● Complete the studies for the cemented backfill and based on the findings, update capital cost requirements.

● Develop a detailed cost estimation for the production of bulk concentrate.

1.2 Economic Analysis

The operation is forecast to generate positive cashflow over the life of the reserves, based on the assumptions detailed in this report. This estimated cashflow
is inherently forward-looking and dependent upon numerous assumptions and forecasts, such as macroeconomic conditions, mine plans and operating
strategy, that are subject to change.

This yields an after-tax LoM NPV@ 7.77% of US$277M, of which US$169M is attributable to Buenaventura.

The analysis performed for this report indicates that the operation’s NPV is most sensitive to variations in the commodity price and plant performance

1.3 Technical Summary

This report was prepared as a Prefeasibility-level Technical Report Summary in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) S-K
regulations (Title 17, Part 229, Items 601 and 1300 until 1305) for Compañia Minera Buenaventura S.A.A. (Buenaventura) by SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A.
 (SRK) on the El Brocal Mine .

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 6

Colquijirca is held within the operating entity, Sociedad Minera El Brocal (El Brocal), of which Buenaventura is a 61.43% owner with the remaining 38.57%
ownership controlled by Sociedad Minera EL Brocal S.A.A.

1.3.1 Property Description

El Brocal is a polymetallic mining company, dedicated to the extraction, concentration and commercialization of silver, lead, zinc and copper minerals. It carries
out its operations in the Colquijirca Mining Unit and Huaraucaca Concentrator Plant, located in the district of Tinyahuarco, province of Pasco, department and
region of Pasco.

El Brocal is located in the district of Tinyahuarco, province of Cerro de Pasco, department of Pasco, Peru, at coordinates 10°45'8.9'' S and 76°16'21.8'' W, 289
km from Lima and 10 km from the city of Cerro de Pasco, at an altitude of approximately 4,300 MASL.

El Brocal exploits two adjoining mines: Tajo Norte, an open-pit operation that produces silver, lead, zinc and copper ores; and Marcapunta, an underground
mine that produces copper minerals. The extracted ore is processed in two concentrator plants, which currently have an installed treatment capacity of 18,000
metric tons per day.

The main access from Lima is via the Carretera Central highway to Cerro de Pasco - Colquijirca (298 km). The unit can also be accessed by air from Lima
(Jorge Chavez airport) to Huanuco (Alferez FAP David Figueroa Fernandini) and then by land via the Huanuco - Chicrin paved road (approximately 81 km to
the site).

1.3.2 Land tenure

Colquijirca has a Mineral concession grouping known a “Accumulation Brocal,” which covers area of 34,386 ha, and one beneficiation concession, which
covers an area of 976 ha. The concessions are in the districts of Tinyahuarco, province of Cerro de Pasco, department of Pasco, Peru.

The Colquijirca - Marcapunta (El Brocal) production unit is owned by Sociedad Minera El Brocal (61.43% Buenaventura), a subsidiary of Buenaventura.

1.3.3 History
Colquijirca has a long productive history: Ag (Au) ore was mined in pre-Inca, Inca, and colonial times. During the first half of the 20th century, the area became
an important producer of Ag and Bi. In 1956, the mining operation was registered as "Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A." In 1994, an aggressive exploration
program began through diamond drilling, which allowed the company to identify and quantify San Gregorio and Marcapunta Projects. In August 2008, capacity
was ramped up to 18,000 MTD. Currently, Colquijirca is one of the largest producers of Zn-Pb-Ag and Cu (Au) in Peru.

1.3.4 Geological and Mineralization

The Colquijirca mining district is located on rocks belonging to the Excelsior Group phyllites, sandstones and red conglomerates of the Mitu Group, followed by
marine limestones of the Pucara Group, and towards the top, conglomerates, and continental facies of carbonate breccias of the Calera Formation. These
units are intruded by the middle Miocene Marcapunta volcanic complex.

Colquijirca has a Mineral concession grouping known a “Accumulation Brocal,” which covers area of 34,386 ha, and one beneficiation concession, which
covers an area of 976 ha. The concessions are in the districts of Tinyahuarco, province of Cerro de Pasco, department of Pasco, Peru.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 7

1.3.5 Exploration Status

SRK notes that the property is an active mining operation with a long history and that results and interpretation from exploration data are generally supported in
more detail by extensive drilling and by active mining exposure of the orebody in pits and underground works.

The area around the Colquijirca Operations has been extensively mapped, sampled, and drilled over several years of exploration work. For the purposes of this
report, active mining, and extensive exploration drilling, should be considered the most relevant and robust exploration work for the current Mineral Resources
estimation.

1.3.6 Mineral Resources Estimates

The 2021 Mineral Resources Model has been updated by SRK and was based on drill hole information. The resource classification was performed by
Buenaventura and reviewed and validated by SRK.

SRK generated geological models in each lithology unit modeled by Buenaventura, which were used as estimation domain based on drilling data. Mineralized
domains identifying potentially economically mineable material were modeled using the indicator tool in Leapfrog Geo to generate grade envelopes (grade
shells). Estimation domains are used to code drill holes for geostatistical analysis, block modeling, and grade interpolation by ordinary kriging. Drilling data was
composited to 2.5 m length samples within relevant grade shell wireframe and grade capping was assessed by element and domain.

Net smelter return (NSR) values ​for each mining block consider expected terms of trade, average metallurgical recovery, the average grade in concentrate and
projected long-term metal prices. Mineral Resources consider operating costs and have been reported above an NSR cut-off differentiated value.

The resource classification considers several aspects that affect the confidence in the resource estimate, including geological continuity and complexity; data
density and orientation; accuracy and precision of the data; and continuity of grade. Mineral Resources are classified as measured, indicated or inferred. The
criteria used for the classification include the number of samples, the spatial distribution, accuracy of the estimation, the risk associated with the low
performance of the QAQC samples and the absence of a detailed structural model in the southern part, the distance from the block centroid and the confidence
limits methodology.

Mineral Resources excluding Mineral Reserves of the El Brocal Mine are reported as of December 3, 2021, and are detailed in  Table 1-1.
Table 1-1:  Summary of Mineral Resources
Zn-Pb Mineral Resources Statement, Open Pit

Resources Category Tonnes Ag Pb Zn Cu As Fe NSR

000's Oz/t % % % % % US$/t
Zn-Pb ore Measured 1,089 0.47 1.25 3.78 0.01 0.00 17.71 42.51
Indicated 1,292 1.22 0.91 3.05 0.07 0.03 13.48 48.76
Measured & Indicated 2,381 0.88 1.06 3.39 0.04 0.02 15.41 45.90
Inferred 1,986 3.31 0.33 1.02 0.07 0.09 8.69 65.63

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 8

Cu Mineral Resources Statement, Open Pit

Resources Category Tonnes Ag Pb Zn Cu As Fe NSR

000’s Oz/t % % % % % US$/t
Cu ore Measured 28 4.48 0.25 0.44 2.95 0.66 4.88 196.32
Indicated 1,173 0.83 0.11 0.23 1.72 0.44 7.34 85.91
Measured & Indicated 1,201 0.92 0.12 0.23 1.75 0.44 7.28 88.49
Inferred 13,844 0.49 0.08 0.07 1.54 0.39 11.77 73.05

Cu Mineral Resources Statement, Underground Mine

Resources Category Tonnes Ag Cu Au As Fe NSR
000’s Oz/t % g/t % % US$/t
Cu ore Measured 893 1.33 2.64 1.04 0.86 19.17 152.56
Indicated 28,704 0.80 1.59 0.87 0.53 20.43 92.35
Measured & Indicated 29,597 0.81 1.62 0.88 0.54 20.39 94.17
Inferred 19,679 0.73 1.76 0.80 0.53 16.31 98.77
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

Notes to accompany Mineral Resources tables:

● The reference point for the Mineral Resources estimate is insitu. The estimate has an effective date of 31 december, 2021. The Qualified Person Firm responsible for the resource estimate is SRK
Consulting (Peru) S.A.Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of those Mineral Resources converted to mineral reserves.   Mineral Resources that are not mineral reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability.

● Resources have been reported as in situ (hard rock within optimized pit shell and stopes).

● Resources have been categorized subject to the opinion of a QP based on the amount/robustness of informing data for the estimate, consistency of geological/grade distribution, survey information,
and have been validated against long term mine reconciliation for the in-situ volumes.

● The estimate uses the following key input parameters: commodity prices of 8,000 USD / t Cu, 1,600 USD / Oz Au, 25 USD / Oz Ag, 2,286 USD / t Pb and 2,385 USD / t Zn; life-of-mine average
metallurgical recoveries was assigned to the block model using defined functions, sublevel stopping mining method is considered; inclusion of internal and external dilution; mining costs;
processing costs; no allocation for general and administrative costs; and an allocation for sustaining capital cost. All these parameters can be seen in detail in Table 11-21, 11-22, 11-23 and 11-24.

● Mineral Resources are reported inside optimized pit and optimized stopes designed above a net smelter return cut-off of: for Open Pit: Zn: 27.14 USD / t ; Cu: 25.95 USD / t; and for Underground:
North an Center: 38.9 USD / t; Southeast and Southwest: 37.5 USD / t and Southwest 2 and South: 41.1 USD / t

● The NSR equations are:

Open Pit: GradeZn(%)*11.12*Recovery Zn(%)+GradeAg(Oz/t)*15.87*Recovery AgZn(Oz/t)+GradePb(%)*12.93*Recovery Pb(%)+GradeAg(Oz/t)*21.36*Recovery AgPb(Oz/t))/100

Underground: GradeCu(%)*48.58*Recovery Cu(%)+GradeAu(g/t)*30.86*Recovery Au(g/t)+GradeAg(Oz/t)*19.18*RecoveryAg(Oz/t))/100

● Mineral Resources tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.

Factors that may affect estimates include metal price and exchange rate assumptions; changes in the assumptions used to generate the cut-off grade; changes
in local interpretations of the geometry of mineralization and continuity of mineralized zones; changes in geological form and mineralization and assumptions of
geological and grade continuity; variations in density and domain assignments; geo-metallurgical assumptions; changes in geotechnical, mining, dilution

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 9

and metallurgical recovery assumptions; switch to design and input parameter assumptions of conceptual stope designs that constrain estimates; and
assumptions as to the continued ability to access the site, retain title to surface and mineral rights, maintain environmental and other regulatory permits, and
maintain the social license to operate.

There are no other known environmental, legal, title, tax, socioeconomic, marketing, political or other factors that could materially affect the estimate of Mineral
Resources or Mineral Reserves that are not discussed in this Report.

1.3.7 Mineral Reserve Estimates

Mineral reserves Estimation for El Brocal mine considers the uses of conventional open pit and underground methods to extract mineral reserves

Proven and probable mineral reserves are converted from measured and indicated Mineral Resources. Conversion is based on pit optimization results (only
open pit), mine design, mine sequence and economic evaluation.  The in situ value is calculated from the estimated grade and certain modifying factors.

The mine LoM plans and resulting mineral reserves stated in this report are based on pre-feasibility level studies.

Mineral reserves effective date is December 31st, 2021

Cost estimation are based on the historic cost of years 2018-2020. Forecast cost estimated considers criteria for future operational conditions and additional
10% contingency.

Mineral reserves are reported above internal NSR cut-off value for open pit materials and above marginal NSR cut-off value for underground materials. The
marginal cut-off considers only the variable cost.

Metallurgical recovery is estimated and assigned to a block model attribute using the recovery functions defined for each element and concentrate.

SRK identified risks related to mining dilution and mining recovery, currency exchange rate, production costs, geotechnical parameters, processing plant
throughput, deleterious elements presence and local politics.   However, to the best of SRK’s knowledge and based on available technical studies and
information provided by Buenaventura, not fatal flaw is present. In the QP’s opinion, the mineral reserves estimation is reasonable.

Summary mineral reserves are shown in the Table 1-2

Table 1-2:  El Brocal Underground Summary Mineral Reserve Statement as of December 31st, 2021

Copper Silver Gold Arsenic

Mining Confidence Tonnage
Grade
Grade
Grade
Grade

Method
category
(kt)

(% Cu)
(g/t Ag)
(g/t Au)
(% As)

Proven 35 1.18 31.35 0.69 0.38

R&P Probable 13,918 1.24 21.83 1.00 0.40
Primary Sub-total
13,953 1.24 21.85 1.00 0.40
Proven &
Probable

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 10

Copper Silver Gold Arsenic

Mining Confidence Tonnage
Grade
Grade
Grade
Grade

Method
category
(kt)

(% Cu)
(g/t Ag)
(g/t Au)
(% As)

R&P Probable 873 1.92 11.87 0.24 0.55

Pillar Recov Sub-total
873 1.92 11.87 0.24 0.55
Proven &
Probable
R&P Probable 751 1.72 17.74 0.72 0.57
Remanent Sub-total
751 1.72 17.74 0.72 0.57
Proven &
Probable
Probable 16,908 1.33 23.35 0.61 0.50
SLS Sub-total
16,908 1.33 23.35 0.61 0.50
Proven &
Probable
Proven 35 1.18 31.35 0.69 0.38
TOTAL Probable 32,450 1.32 22.26 0.77 0.46
Total

& Probable 32,485 1.32 22.27 0.77 0.46
Proven
Source: SRK, 2021
(1) Buenaventura's attributable portion of Mineral Resources and reserves is 61.00% (Amounts reported in the table corresponds to the total mineral reserves)
(2) The reference point for the mineral reserve estimate is the point of delivery to the process plant.
(3) Mineral reserves are current as of December 31st, 2021 and are reported using the mineral reserve definitions in S-K 1300. The Qualified Person Firm responsible for the estimate is SRK
Consulting (Peru) SA
(4) Key parameters used in mineral reserves estimate include:
(a) Average long term prices of copper price of 8,000 US$/t, gold price of 1,600 US$/oz, silver price of 25.00 US$/oz, lead price of 2,286 US$/t, zinc price of 2,385
US$/t
(b) Variable metallurgical recoveries are accounted for in the NSR calculations and defined according to recovery functions, that average 84% for copper, 35% for gold
and 52% for silver
(c) Mineral reserves are reported above a marginal net smelter return cut-off of 37.49 US$/t for room & pillar primary stopes, 38.94 US$/t for pillar recovery with
cemented backfill, 38.76 US$/t for remanent ore recovery and 41.12 US$/t for sub level stoping mining methods.
(d) Underground ore is scheduled to be processed mainly in the Plant 1 (used to process Copper ore)
(5) Mineral reserves tonnage, grades and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding

Table 1-3:  El Brocal Open Pit Summary Mineral Reserve Statement as of December 31st, 2021

Copper Silver Gold Lead Zinc Arsenic

Confidence Tonnage
Ore Type Grade
Grade
Grade
Grade
Grade
Grade

category
(kt)

(% Cu)
(g/t Ag)
(g/t Au)
(% Pb)
(% Zn)
(% As)

Proven 2,288 2.35 96.48 0.01     0.21

Copper Ore Probable 24,059 1.64 15.56 0.24     0.43

Sub-total
26,347 1.70 22.59 0.22     0.41
Proven &
Probable

Proven 4,789   91.55   1.37 2.65 0.05

Lead-Zinc Ore Probable 3,418   91.92   0.70 1.44 0.10

Sub-total
8,207   91.70   1.09 2.15 0.07
Proven &
Probable
Source: SRK, 2021

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 11

(1) Buenaventura's attributable portion of Mineral Resources and reserves is 61.00% (Amounts reported in the table corresponds to the total mineral
reserves)
(2) The reference point for the mineral reserve estimate is the point of delivery to the process plant.
(3) Mineral reserves are current as of December 3stth, 2021 and are reported using the mineral reserve definitions in S-K 1300. The Qualified Person Firm
responsible for the estimate is SRK Consulting (Peru) SA
(4) Key parameters used in mineral reserves estimate include:
(a) Average long term prices of copper price of 8,000 US$/t, gold price of 1,600 US$/oz, silver price of 25.00 US$/oz, lead price of 2,286 US$/t, zinc
price of 2,385 US$/t
(b) Variable metallurgical recoveries are accounted for in the NSR calculations and defined according to recovery functions, that average for
Plant 1 (Cu): 70% for copper, 24% for gold and 48% for silver

Plant 2 (Pb-Zn): 45% for lead, 54% for zinc and 63% for silver
(38% in lead concentrate and 25% in zinc concentrate)
(c) Mineral reserves are reported above an internal net smelter return cut-off of 27.14 US$/t for open pit ore sent to Plant 2 (PbZn) and 25.95 US$/t
for open pit ore sent to Plant 1 (Cu)
(e) Open pit ore is scheduled to be processed in the Plant 1 (Copper ore) and Plant 2 (Lead-Zinc ore)

(5) Mineral reserves tonnage, grades and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to
rounding
(6) It has not been generated total sum values. Both products do have not the same saleable and payable elements

1.3.8 Mining Methods

The underground mining methods are Sub level Stopping with cemented back fill and Room and Pillar with long holes. The pillars left in the ground are chain
pillars that run along the entire mining direction and cover the mantle’s extension.  This method varies depending on the mining sector.  North Sector: the stope
is 8 m wide stope and 28 m high, and length varies between 50 to 100 m; the pillar width has been set at 6 m in between open stopes.  South Sector: which
includes the Southwest and Southeast Zone: the stope is 14 m wide, 28 m high, and the length varies between 50 and 100 m, with a pillar width of 6 m in
between open stopes. Recovery of ore pillars using cemented or detrital backfill is planned.  

The open pit has the following design parameters: Bench height: 6 m, Berm width: variable between 5 and 8 m, Ramp width: considering equipment width,
safety distances, and safety berm, the open pit have ramp widths of 12 m with a 10% slope, Optimum turning radius according to the equipment fleet is 6.4 m,
Minimum loading width considering the excavator and the minimum spaces to carry out operational activities is 20 m.  However, one excavator is expected to
work with two trucks.  As such, the estimated width can be up to 60 m.

1.3.9 Mineral Processing

El Brocal operates two independent conventional flotation plants, namely Plant 1 and Plant 2. Plant 1 processes copper ore from Marcapunta mine to recover
copper minerals in order to produce copper concentrate. Plant 2 processes lead and zinc ores from, mostly from the Tajo Norte mine, to recover lead and zinc
minerals with the purposes of producing lead concentrate and zinc concentrate.

Plant 1 is a conventional concentration plant producing copper concentrate that is transported offsite by dump trucks, and to a lesser extent, rail cars, for sale
to third parties. The plant’s unit processes include crushing, grinding, flotation, and thickening. Final tails are thickened and disposed of in a conventional
tailing’s storage facility. Final concentrate generated in the flotation stage is thickened, then dewatered before being sent to Callao Port. Copper concentrate
production reached typical commercial quality grades for copper of around 25% but also contained

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 12

high arsenic (Enargite minerals) values around 8% or higher. This makes it difficult to sell in the open market.

Plant 2 (11,500 tonnes/day) is a conventional, sequential multi-stage concentrator that produces lead and zinc concentrates that are trucked offsite to be sold
to third parties. The plant’s unit processes include crushing, washing, grinding, and flotation. Final tails are thickened and disposed of in a conventional tailing’s
storage facility. Final concentrates are thickened and dewatered before being trucked off site.

Both Plant 1 and Plant 2 operation and metallurgical performance suggest that significant improvements are needed. Grinding product size is highly unsteady
with major fluctuations from day to day in grinding. Similarly daily throughput is also showing uncharacteristic variability on a day-to-day basis. Both processing
facilities also exhibit operating time significantly below the industry standard of 90% to 95%. Tajo Norte seems to be unable to supply enough ore to operate
Plant 2 at full capacity.

A comprehensive metallurgical program is necessary to support the metallurgical parameters for industrial scale operation when processing future ore. This
testing program results should also be the benchmark for future industrial scale performance.

1.3.10 Infrastructure

The in-situ and operating infrastructure at El Brocal includes the following:

● The Condorcayan waste rock management facility
● Huachuacaja tailings management facility and ancillary facilities
● Mine Operations Support Facilities (main facilities are: Access ramps, underground workshop, administration buildings, maintenance workshops,
explosive storage, etc.)
● Processing Plant Support Facilities
● Power Supply and distribution: The power supply for the project is obtained from two hydroelectric power stations owned by Sociedad Minera El Brocal
(SMEB) and Electroandes.  The mining unit energy is provided from the following facilities:
● Water Supply: Water Source comes from the Pun Run lagoon and the Blanco River.  The freshwater reservoir has a capacity of 2,300 m³)
● Domestic water treatment plants:
● Waste Water Treatment: Acid water: 240L/s of acid water through the High-Density Sludge process. Domestic wastewater treatment plants (PTARD)
Solid Waste Disposal has an area of 6.5 ha.

1.3.11 Market Studies

Buenaventura’s copper concentrate has substantial payable metal content.  It has high copper and silver, with reasonable gold content.  However, the product
has very high arsenic content.  With arsenic levels of 6.5-9.5%, this would make selling the concentrate directly to smelters almost impossible, as they would
have to extensively blend the product to reach a more generally acceptable level of 0.2% As content (although certain smelters are capable of processing
higher levels).  

Buenaventura’s zinc concentrate from El Brocal has a relatively standard zinc content and high silver content.  This is one of the least complex products in
Buenaventura’s portfolio and is generally regarded as a versatile product that has no problem finding a market.  Although the high humidity of the concentrate
is a minor element of concern, this has no impact on payability.  Going

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 13

forward, Buenaventura has contracts in place with standard buyers committing 82% of El Brocal’s zinc concentrate production in 2022, and 21% in 2023.  The
business relationship with these buyers is ongoing and negotiations are expected to continue in the future.

1.3.12 Environmental Studies, Permitting, and Plans, Negotiations, or Agreements with Local Individuals or Groups

SRK has confirmed that the Colquijirca Unit’s PAMA was approved by the regulatory authority in 2002.  Subsequently, that mine received approval for several
EIAs for different components and expansions of the operation (2001, 2004, 2008, 2011, 2014; amendments to these studies (2012); and complied with minor
or environmentally non-significant variations of the STR (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021) as well as with elements of prior communications.

After reviewing the descriptive scope of the documents identified above, SRK has concluded that the main activities and components for mining and
beneficiation at Colquijirca MU have obtained statutory Environmental Certifications.   SRK has come to the same conclusion regarding the ancillary
components of the mine.

From the review of available documents, SRK was able to corroborate that the Colquijirca MU has mining rights for its mining and ancillary activities and
possesses the corresponding operating permit from the mining authority.

SRK’s review of available documents corroborates that the Colquijirca MU has the corresponding permits to develop its mining beneficiation activities.

The unit has water use rights to meet its operational needs, both for human consumption (DWTP in the Colquijirca and Huaraucaca areas; staff camp, Camp's
Pavilion G, Huaraucaca offices, etc.) and for industrial mining purposes.

The mine owner declares that “discharges occur solely at WWTPi, Huaraucaca DWWTP, and Jupayragra Power Plant”, which are covered by the
corresponding authorizations,

Regulations require that the water provided for human consumption meet specific conditions for quality.  To this end, DWTPs must have the corresponding
sanitary authorization for the water treatment system.   SRK verified that said authorization has been obtained for the Colquijirca mining camp and the
Huaraucaca mining camp DWTPs.

SRK also verified that the mine received sanitary authorization for septic tanks and land infiltration in 2011.

SRK verified that the operation possesses a Certificate of Non-existence of Archaeological Remains for the Colquijirca Unit, Huachuacaja area, and
Marcapunta

Colquijirca MU's activities comply with the legal requirement of having presented measures for the progressive, final, and post-closure of its existing and
planned components.   From the information contained in the Semiannual Mine Closure Plan Compliance Reports, SRK has concluded that the following
progressive closure works are potentially delayed or non-compliant with respect to the approved Mine Closure Plan:

● Unish waste dump physical and geochemical stability works.

● Santa Maria waste dump physical and geochemical stability works.
● Drilling rig disassembly, physical stability, and geochemical stability works.
● Livestock Improvement Program, Environmental Education & Training Program, and Monitoring Training - Social.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 14

The current social management plan of Colquijirca Mining Unit - El Brocal - BUENAVENTURA S.A.A.   includes instruments in place prior to the unit’s
acquisition in 2018, but some goals have been rescheduled due COVID-19 and to reflect the company’s desire to strengthen social relations by fulfilling
obligations and commitments acquired with the population of the area of interest and direct/indirect influence.  When Corporación Buenaventura purchased El
Brocal, it assumed commitments made by the previous owners to ensure that good social relationships are developed obtained.   Of the 45 obligations
reviewed, 73% have been executed within the time and budget allocated prior to ot the initiation of the progressive closure stage.  Slight delays in execution
are attributable to COVID-19 restrictions and social distancing requirements, which impeded the execution of a number of social initiatives.  To avoid contagion,
participatory training and monitoring, for example, could not be conducted; this is reflected in the weighted progress.  The COVID-19 context has weakened
community relations and the ADSI and AISI have been unable to conduct planned visits to the community.  It is clear that the Social Affairs Area of the mining
unit requires more support to implement its strategy, which seeks to strengthen and improve community relations to lay the groundwork to acquire land or areas
of interest to expand the Colquijirca mining operation down the line.

1.3.13 Capital and Operating Costs

SRK has estimated the capital and operating cost based on the review and analysis of::

● Historical operating costs from 2018 to 2020, including a detailed analysis of the cost database and compilation of costs for forecast estimation;

● Projected capital cost for the LOM of El Brocal, including sustaining CAPEX

● Closure cost estimation developed by SRK

The summary estimated cost is shown in the Table 1-4.

Table 1-4:  Summary estimates cost

Estimated cost *
Item ** Units

(Inc. 10% Contingency)

Mining Open Pit    
Waste US$ / t waste 1.87
Ore US$ / t ore 2.32
Mining Underground    
R&P Primary US$ / t ore 27.88
R&P Remanent US$ / t ore 29.15
R&P Pillar Recov US$ / t ore 29.33
SLS US$ / t ore 31.51
Plant Processing    
Plant 1 (Cu) US$ / t processed 17.47
Plant 2 (PbZn) US$ / t processed 16.28
G&A Mine Operations US$ / t processed 6.84
Sustaining CAPEX    
Mining US$ / t ore 1.38
Processing US$ / t processed 2.29
Off Site Cost (Corporate) *** M US$ / year 8.14
Other costs    

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 15

Estimated cost *
Item ** Units

(Inc. 10% Contingency)

Incremental cost **** US$ / bench - t rock 0.011
Voids research ***** US$ / t rock 6.85
Source: Buenaventura
* Some items, depending on the cost type, do not include a contingency

** Estimation does not include selling expenses and some commercial costs stated by the contract with the trader. These costs are included directly in the Cashflow

*** Average forecast corporate cost (2022-2032) attributable to El Brocal mining unit
**** Estimated for a bench height of 6 m
***** Cost is applied only to blocks adjacent to zones with the potential existence of voids

The capital cost estimated by Buenaventura totals 288.96 MUS$ for the LoM. No further details on concepts or infrastructure are added to the amount received
from Buenaventura.

SRK estimated the closure cost (additional details can be found in Section Error! Reference source not found.) for all three stages of the closure process
and has included a capital and operating cost estimation for a water treatment plant. A summary of total closure costs is shown in Table 1-5
Table 1-5:  Summary of total closure costs

Period Progressive closure Final Closure Post Closure Water treatment

Direct Indirect Direct Indirect Direct Indirect Direct Indirect

(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)

2022-2033 134.47 14.74            

2034-2038     19.06 8.71        
2037-2056         0.50 0.27    
2034-2056             1.32 51.68
Source: Buenaventura

1.3.14 Economic Analysis

El Brocal’s operation consists of an open pit and underground mine and processing facilities. The operation is expected to have a 11-year life;

El Brocal’s operation consists of an open pit and underground mine and processing facilities. The operation is expected to have a 11-year life; the first year of
operation is modeled.

The economic analysis metrics are prepared on an annual after tax basis in US$. The results of the analysis are presented in Table 1-6. The results indicate
that the operation returns an after-tax NPV@7.77% of US$277M (US$169M attributable to Buenaventura). Note that because the mine is operating and is
valued on a total project basis where prior costs are treated as sunk, IRR and payback period analysis are not relevant metrics.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 16

Table 1-6:  Indicative Economic Results

Units Value
LoM Cash Flow (Unfinanced)
Total Net Sales M US$ 4,569.74
Total Operating cost M US$ 3,352.76
Total Operating Income M US$ 293.17
Income Taxes Paid M US$ 32.16
EBITDA
Free Cash Flow M US$ 991.76
NPV @ 7.77% M US$ 707.72
After Tax
Free Cash Flow M US$ 320.18
NPV @ 7.77% M US$ 277.03

Source: SRK

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 17

2 Introduction

2.1 Registrant for Whom the Technical Report Summary was Prepared
This Technical Report Summary was prepared by SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A.  for Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.  (61.43% owner of Sociedad Minera El Brocal)
in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) S-K regulations (Title 17, Part 229, Items 601 and 1300 through 1305) and covers the
Colquijirca Project.

2.2 Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report

The quality of information, conclusions, and estimates contained herein are consistent with the services provided by SRK and are based on   i) information
available at the time of preparation and ii) the assumptions, conditions, and qualifications set forth in this report.   This report is intended for use by
Buenaventura subject to the terms and conditions of its contract with SRK and relevant securities legislation.  The contract permits Buenaventura to file this
report as a Technical Report Summary with regulatory authorities in the U.S.  pursuant to the SEC S-K regulations, more specifically Title 17, Subpart 229.600,
item 601(b)(96) - Technical Report Summary and Title 17, Subpart 229.1300 - Disclosure by Registrants Engaged in Mining Operations.   Except for the
purposes regulated under provincial securities law, any other uses of this report by any third party are at said party’s sole risk.  Buenaventura continues to be
liable for this disclosure remains with Buenaventura.  

The purpose of this Technical Report Summary is to report Mineral Resources, mineral reserves, and exploration results.

The effective date of this report is March 15, 2022.

2.3 Sources of Information

This report is based in part on internal Company technical reports, previous feasibility studies, maps, published government reports, company letters and
memoranda, and public information as cited throughout this report and listed in the References Section 24.

Reliance upon information provided by the registrant is listed in the Section 25 when applicable.

2.4 Details of Inspection

Table 2-1 summarizes the details of the property inspections conducted by each qualified person or, if applicable, indicates the reasons why a personal
inspection has not been completed.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 18

Table 2-1:  Site Visits

Reason why a personal inspection has not been
Expertise Date(s) of Visit Details of Inspection
completed
• Laboratory
Geology/
March, 2022 • Geological Logging office
Resources
• Mine Entrance
All process areas from the delivery of ROM ore to
the final product ready for shipment-Chemical
Metallurgy March, 2022
metallurgical laboratory
Precious metals smelter and refinery area
Visit the underground mine and open-pit
operations zones, including production and
development underground areas and two open-pit
benches in production. The visit to the production
stopes allowed to observe the application of the
mining method and the sequence of activities of
the mining cycle, this sequence was observed in
Mining January, 2021 the open pit operations as well. For open pit and
underground the visual inspection of ground
condition (and ground support used for UG), water
presence, condition of auxiliary services and quick
route of the surface infrastructure
Meeting with planning and operations mine staff to
review the current mine operations, short term and
long term plans
Site Visit not
completed due
Other Areas
to Covid-19
travel restrictions
Source: SRK

2.5 Report Version Update

The user of this document should ensure that this constitutes the most recent Technical Report Summary available the property.  

This Technical Report Summary is not an update of a previously filed Technical Report Summary.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 19

3 Property Description
The Colquijirca - Marcapunta (El Brocal) production unit is owned by Sociedad Minera El Brocal (61.43% Buenaventura), a subsidiary of Buenaventura.

Colquijirca Mining District has a long productive history dating back to pre-Inca, Inca, and colonial times, and has mainly focused on silver mining.  It was a key
producer of Ag and Bi during the first half of the 20th century (Buenaventura, 2021) and is currently one of the largest producers of Zn-Pb-Ag and Cu (Au).

3.1 Property Location

El Brocal is located in the district of Tinyahuarco, province of Cerro de Pasco, department of Pasco, Peru, at coordinates 10°45'8.9'' S and 76°16'21.8'' W, 289
km from Lima and 10 km from the city of Cerro de Pasco, at an altitude of approximately 4,300 MASL. (Figure 3-1).

Figure 3-1  Location map of El Brocal mine, which comprises the deposits of Colquijirca, Marcapunta, and San Gregorio.
Source: (Buenaventura, 2021)

3.2 Property Area

Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.   conducts its mining operations using the open pit method at Tajo Norte mine (silver, lead, and zinc ores) and the
underground method at Marcapunta Norte mine (copper ores).  The Marcapunta Sur Oeste and San Gregorio are the Company’s most important exploration
projects (El Brocal, 2019).  Figure 3-2 shows the mining unit's map and its main mining operations.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 20

Figure 3-2:  Map of El Brocal mining operations and concentrator plant.

Source: Buenaventura, 2020

3.3 Mineral Title, Claim, Mineral Right, Lease or Option Disclosure

El Brocal comprised of a group of mining concessions known as "Acumulación Brocal" and a beneficiation concession (concentrator).   These concessions
represent the area of mines and exploration projects (Figure 3-3).  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 21

Table 3-1: Information on the concessions of El Brocal mining property.

As

Date Expiry
Claim ID Name Owner Reported Status
Area (Ha)

Granted Date

Type
Does not
Acumulacion Sociedad Minera Accumulation
010000121L
Mineral Right
3/8/2021 expiry as
long 34,386.84
Brocal El Brocal S.A.A. M.T. Title
as
statutory
Hda. de Benef. Sociedad Minera
P0100403
Mineral Right Concentrator 6/24/1981 duties 976.68
Huaraucaca El Brocal S.A.A.

are paid

Source: Buenaventura

SRK reports that all of the Mineral Resources and reserves presented in this report are within the concessions controlled by Sociedad Minera El Brocal.

Figure 3-3:  El Brocal mining claims

Source: (Buenaventura, 2021)

3.4 Mineral Rights Description and How They Were Obtained

Property and Title in Peru (INGEMMET, 2021)

Overview

The right to explore, extract, process and/or produce minerals in Peru is primarily regulated by mining laws and regulations enacted by Peruvian Congress and
the executive branch of government, under the 1992 Mining Law.  The law regulates nine different mining activities:

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 22

reconnaissance; prospecting; exploration; exploitation (mining); general labor; beneficiation; commercialization; mineral transport; and mineral storage outside
a mining facility.  

The Ministry of Energy and Mines (MINEM) is the authority that regulates mining activities.   MINEM also grants mining concessions to local or foreign
individuals or legal entities through a specialized body: The Institute of Geology, Mining and Metallurgy (Ingemmet).

Other relevant regulatory authorities include the Ministry of Environment (MINAM), the National Environmental Certification Authority (SENACE), and the
Supervisory Agency for Investment in Energy and Mining (Osinergmin). The Environmental Evaluation and Oversight Agency (OEFA) monitors environmental
compliance.

Mineral Tenure
Mining concessions can be granted separately for metallic and non-metallic minerals.   Concessions can range in size from a minimum of 100 ha to a
maximum of 1,000 ha.

● The mining concessions that have been granted will remain valid providing the concession owner complies with the following:

● Pays annual concession taxes or validity fees (derecho de vigencia), which are currently US$3/ha.   Failure to pay the applicable license fees for two
consecutive years will result in cancellation of the mining concession

● Meets minimum expenditure commitments or production levels.   The minima are divided into two classes:

o Achieve “Minimum Annual Production” by the first semester of Year 11, counting from the year after the concession was granted, or pay a penalty
for non-production on a sliding scale, as defined by Legislative Decree N° 1320 which became effective on 1 January, 2019.  “Minimum Annual
Production” is defined as one tax unit (UIT) per hectare per year, which is S/4,200 in 2019 (about US$1,220)
o Alternatively, no penalty is payable if a “Minimum Annual Investment” is made of at least 10 times the amount of the penalty.

The penalty structure sets forth that if a concession holder cannot reach the minimum annual production by the first semester of the 11th year from the year in
which the concessions were granted, the concession holder will be required to pay a penalty equivalent to 2% of the applicable minimum production per year
per hectare until the 15th year.   If the concession holder cannot reach the minimum annual production on the first semester of the 16th year from the year in
which the concessions were granted, the concession holder will be required to pay a penalty equivalent to 5% of the applicable minimum production per year
per hectare until the 20th year.   If the holder cannot reach the minimum annual production by the first semester of the 20th year from the year in which the
concessions were granted, the holder will be required to pay a penalty equivalent to 10% of the applicable minimum production per year per hectare until the
30th year.   Finally, if the holder cannot reach the minimum annual production during the last stated period, the mining concessions will automatically expire.

The new legislation stipulates that title-holders of mining concessions that were granted before December 2008 will be obligated to pay the penalty as of 2019
if the title-holder didn´t reach either the Minimum Annual Production or made the Minimum Annual Investment in 2018.  

Mining concessions will lapse automatically if any of the following events take place:

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 23

● The annual fee is not paid for two consecutive years.

● The applicable penalty is not paid for two consecutive years.
● The Minimum Annual Production Target is not met within 30 years following the year after the concession was granted.

Beneficiation concessions follow the same rules as those applicable to mining concessions.    A fee must be paid that reflects the nominal capacity of the
processing plant or level of production.   Failure to pay such processing fees or fines for two years will result in the loss of the beneficiation concession.

Permits
In order to begin mineral exploration activities, a company is required to comply with the following requirements and obtain a resolution of approval from
MINEM, as defined by Supreme Decree No.  020-2012-EM of 6 June 2012:

● Resolution of approval of the Environmental Impact Statement

● Work program
● A statement from the concession holder indicating that it is owner of the surface land and in the case that it is not owner, it has authorization from the
owners of the surface land to perform exploration activities
● Water License, Permission or Authorization to use water
● Mining concession titles
● A certificate of non-existence of archeological remains (CIRA) whereby the Ministry of Culture certifies that there are no monuments or remains within
a project area.  However, even with a CIRA, exploration companies can only undertake earth movement under the direct supervision of an onsite
archeologist.

Other Considerations
Producing mining companies must submit, and receive approval for, an environmental impact assessment that includes a social relations plan; certification that
there are no archaeological remains in the area; and a draft of the mine closure plan.   Closure plans must be accompanied by payment of a monetary
guarantee.

In April 2012, Peru’s Government approved the Consulta Previa Law (prior consultation) and its regulations were approved by Supreme Decree Nº 001-2012-
MC.   These norms require prior consultation with any indigenous communities, as identified by the Ministry of Culture, before any infrastructure or projects, in
particular mining and energy projects, are developed in the communities’ areas.

Mining companies must also obtain water rights from the National Water Authority and surface lands rights from individual landowners.

3.5 Encumbrances
SRK has no knowledge of any material encumbrances that may affect the current resources or reserves as presented in this report.   For more details on
infrastructure modifications related to an expansion or development of the current Mineral Resource or reserve, please refer to Section 15 of this report.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 24

3.6 Other Significant Factors and Risk

SRK has no knowledge of any other significant factors or risks that may affect access, title, or the right or ability to perform work on the mineral property.

3.7 Royalties or Similar Interest

SRK is not aware of royalty payments or similar payments beyond those established by Peruvian law for resource explotation.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 25

4 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

4.1 Topography, Elevation and Vegetation

The Colquijirca mining unit is located at an average altitude of 4,300 MASL and is part of the high plains.  Its topography is relatively gentle compared to the
western and eastern mountain ranges.   The mine is delimited by two sub-parallel valleys, named Ocshopampa and Andacancha, to the east and west of
Marcapunta hill respectively.  Other geomorphological features include pampas, creeks, summits, hills, and depressions (glacial cirques).

Regarding vegetation, there are two types of vegetation units in the area based on the vegetation cover map: wetlands and scrublands.  However, these are
scarce and are characterized by the sporadic presence of natural grasses such as ichu and tuber crops.  Various plants such as totora reeds grow around
lagoons and wetlands.  (Territorio y Medio Ambiente S.A.C., 2019)

4.2 Means of Access

The mining unit can be accessed via the following routes:

● Lima – Casapalca – La Oroya – Cerro de Pasco – Colquijirca: 298 km (paved road)

● Lima – La Viuda – Canta – Huayllay – Colquijirca: 266 km

Any of these routes can be covered in approximately six hours.  The unit can also be accessed by air from Lima to Huanuco and then by land via the Huanuco
- Chicrin paved road (approximately 81 km to the site).  

4.3 Climate and Length of Operating Season

Typical regional climatic conditions in the Colquijirca area, at altitudes between 4,180 and 4,435 MASL, are characterized by a very rainy and semi-frigid
climate, with average annual rainfall of 1,207.7 mm and an average annual temperature that varies between 4.2 and 6.0 °C.  The rainiest season is between
January and March, corresponding to the summer season (wet season).  The dry season (with less precipitation) runs from June to August.  The average
temperature for the evaluated area is 5.3 °C.   The average relative humidity varies from 81.5% in August to 84.5% in March (Territorio y Medio Ambiente
S.A.C., 2019).  

Mining operations are carried out throughout the year.

4.4 Infrastructure Availability and Sources

4.4.1 Water

Natural water sources used by both the operations and the population come from the Angascancha and Pun Run lagoons.  Water catchment from both lagoons
is important given the high quality of captured resources.  These waters are used continuously throughout the year.

El Brocal is aware that water from these lagoons belongs to the Peruvian State, which has issued the following resolutions through the National Water Authority
(ANA):

● Administrative Resolution No.  143-2011-ANA-ALA PASCO, which grants water use licenses for energy purposes.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 26

● Administrative Resolution No.  001-2011-ANA-ALA PASCO, which grants water use licenses for population purposes.
● Administrative Resolution No.  002-2011-ANA-ALA PASCO, which grants water use licenses for metallurgical mining purposes.

4.4.2 Electricity

The electrical energy sources used are shown below:

Table 4-1:  Electrical Energy Source
ELECTRICAL ENERGY SOURCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION
In Kilowatt hours
In Megajoules (MJ) Percentage of use
(kWh)
Energy consumption by Purchase of energy from Empresa de Generación
221,822,485 798,560,946 96.41%
secondary sources Eléctrica Huanza
Energy consumption by Energy produced by Central Hidroeléctrica
4,205,247 15,138,892 1.83%
primary sources Jupayragra
Energy produced by Central Hidroeléctrica Río
4,058,447 14,610,410 1.76%
Blanco
Total 230,086,179 100%
Source: (El Brocal, 2020)

4.4.3 Personnel
El Brocal has a recruitment, selection, and hiring policy: it seeks experienced and employees with experience in the mining industry to provide timely and
practical solutions for different operational and support processes.  These individuals must also be able to contribute to the fulfillment of strategic objectives.
 Most of the personnel working on the project live in the camp or in nearby communities.  Skilled labor comes from different provinces of the region and from all
over the country (El Brocal, 2020).  

As of December 31, 2020, 3255 company and contractor employees are working at El Brocal.  Direct employees are classified by type of contract, gender and
professional category.
Table 4-2:  Direct employees classified by type of hiring and gender
Type of contract Gender 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Women 6 7 17 16 25
Fixed-term
Men 2 4 21 318 315
Women 27 32 175 14 32
Indefinite-term
Men 627 645 551 434 423
Women 33 39 192 30 57
Sub Total
Men 629 649 572 752 738
Total 662 688 764 782 795
Source: (El Brocal, 2020)

Table 4-3:  Direct employees classified by type of professional category

Professional category Pasco Men Women Total
Management 4 4 4
Executives 163 148 15 163
Employees 175 168 7 175
Laborers 311 307 4 311
Teachers 9 2 7 9
Total 662 629 33 662
Source: (El Brocal, 2020)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 27

4.4.4 Supplies

Supplies are readily available from established vendors and services from the local and regional communities and form Lima City.

Local suppliers refer to those located in Pasco Region.  These include businesses owned by community members located within the area of direct influence
(ADI) of the El Brocal Mine.   Supply chain issues could be related to the blockage of the transport routes (Carretera central Highway), however the
contingency plan provides alternative routes to the city of Lima (Lima-Canta-Huallay highway and Cañete-Lunahuana-Huancayo highway).

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 28

5 History
The origins of the mining site in question date back to pre-Inca times.  The Tinyahuarcos tribe extracted silver from the foot of the hill located in front of Puntac-
Marca, which due to its abundance and quality was named GOLGUE (silver) and JIRCA (hill).  Today, Colquijirca, translates into “silver hill".

Excerpted from (El Brocal, 2019).

In 1549, the Spaniards arrived in the area and began working in the Golguejirca mines.  In 1880, the Colquijirca mine, owned by the Spanish citizen Manuel
Clotet, was ceded to his son-in-law, Eulogio Fernandini, who in 1886 began work on the main Colquijirca tunnel (mining underground work) cavern, which was
later called the "Socavón Fernandini".   The execution of this 900-meter-long work took 13 years when finally, silver, lead and zinc veins were eventually
discovered.

In 1889, the Huaraucaca Smelter was installed to produce silver bars; engineer Antenor Rizo Patrón was in charge of overseeing installation and subsequent
management of the smelter.  In 1921, the smelter and replace it with a flotation plant located at the same site.

On May 7, 1956, the mining operation was registered as "Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.".  In 1973, work began on the "Mercedes-Chocayoc" open pit, while
in the Marcapunta area, underground mining was carried out.  In 1974, conventional underground mining ceased and open pit stripping was intensified; this led
production to increase by 580 MTD and later, by 1,000 MTD.

Between 1980 and 1981, activities in the open pit increased to produce 1,500 MTD of ore.  In 1990 and 1991, 1,750 MTD and 2,000 MTD of ore were treated,
respectively, from the Principal and Mercedes-Chocayoc pits.

In 1994, an aggressive exploration program began through diamond drilling, which allowed the company to identify and quantify San Gregorio and Marcapunta
Projects.

In November 1996, the Huaraucaca concentrator plant launched processes for selective flotation of zinc, silver and lead.  This year, production reached 2,200
MTD.  In 2007, the installed capacity of the Huaraucaca concentrator plant was 5,500 MTD.

After the Board of Directors approved an expansion program in August 2008, ore production capacity was ramped up to 18,000 MTD in 2009 and by 2014,
Plant 1 produced 7,000 MTD and Plant 2: 11,000 MTD with an installed capacity of 18,000 tonnes per day.

Background
The Colquijirca Mining District has been studied by many national and international geologists who, as more geological data has become available, have
postulated different genetic models to estimate its economic potential.  

This district has a long productive history: Ag (Au) ore was mined in pre-Inca, Inca, and colonial times.   During the first half of the 20th century, the area
became an important producer of Ag and Bi and is currently one of the largest producers of Zn-Pb-Ag and Cu (Au).

In 1994, Geoterrex carried out a geophysical campaign in Colquijirca, Marcapunta and San Gregorio, delimiting two geophysical anomalies in Marcapunta and
two others in San Gregorio.  The geophysical methods used included electromagnetism (Time Domain EM), gravimetry and induced polarization.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 29

A last geophysical campaign was carried out by Geoterrex in 1995, including Gravimetry and Induced Polarization works, which corrected a false anomaly in
the northern sector of San Gregorio and confirmed the first anomaly.  Two other anomalies were confirmed:  Marcapunta Norte and Marcapunta Oeste.

From 2005 to 2007 an aggressive diamond drilling campaign was carried out at Marcapunta Norte, on the geophysical anomalies carried out in 1994 and 1995.
  Around 30,000 meters of diamond drilling were carried out, making a total of 110 drillholes, with the purpose of increase Mineral Resources and the certainty
of existing resources.

At the beginning of 2008, underground operations restarted at the Marcapunta Norte Mine; 1000 MTD of copper ore were produced through the Room and
Pillar mining method.

Currently, exploitation at the Marcapunta Mine has increased significantly and now produces 8,000 MTD of copper ore through a Sub Level Stopping method.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 30

6 Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit

6.1 Regional, Local and Property Geology

The Colquijirca mining unit is located within the Cerro de Pasco (22-k) quadrangle.  Its regional geology is predominantly made up of lithostratigraphic units
corresponding to Excelsior Group, Mitu Group, Pucará Group, Chambará Formation and Pocobamba Formation - Calera Formation, and igneous rocks in the
form of batholiths, subvolcanic stocks, domes and diatremes (Figure 6-1).  All igneous bodies have been emplaced at different ages, but can be grouped into 6
events: Carboniferous, Upper Permian - Lower Triassic, Eocene, Oligocene, Lower Miocene and Upper Miocene (Figure 6-2).   Sedimentary, volcanic and
intrusive rocks are covered by Quaternary deposits of diverse origin, nature, thickness and propagation.  The Colquijirca mine area, according to Cobbing's
geotechnical schematization, is in the "Western Peruvian Basin", which was affected by several tectonic phases (El Brocal, 2021) .

Volcanic activity began approximately 14.13 Ma ago (Bissig et al., 2008).   Then, between 12.4 and 12.7 Ma (Bendezú & Fontboté, 2002) marks the highest
volcanic activity in Marcapunta, with the emplacement of dacitic domes, followed by polymetallic mineralization between 11.6 and 10.5 Ma; finally, the resurgent
Montura dome occurs after 10.5 Ma (INGEMMET, 2011) .

The Marcapunta volcanic complex is located between the San Juan fault and the Cerro de Pasco fault, both of N-S direction, which controlled the
emplacement of Cerro de Pasco and Yanamate domes.   The northern edge of the Marcapunta Volcanic Complex is in contact with the Calera Formation of the
Eocene-Oligocene, which is the host rock of mineralization in Colquijirca mine; the southern edge is in contact with the western facies of Pucará Group
(Ángeles, 1999; Bendezú & Fontboté, 2002; Bendezú, 2007; Sarmiento, 2004); and the eastern and western edges are covered by Quaternary material
(INGEMMET, 2011) .  

Figure 6-1:  Geology and main mining centers in the Cerro de Pasco sector, central Andes of Peru.
Source: (Bendezú, Page, Spikings, Pecskay, & Fonboté, 2008)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 31

Figure 6-2:  Magmatic arcs of the Cerro de Pasco (22-k) quadrangle.

Source: (INGEMMET, 2011)

6.2 Local Geology

Excerpted from (El Brocal, 2021)

The Colquijirca mining district is located on rocks belonging to the Excelsior Group phyllites, sandstones and red conglomerates of the Mitu Group, followed by
marine limestones of the Pucara Group, and towards the top, conglomerates and continental facies of carbonate breccias of the Calera Formation of Eocene-
Oligocene age.  These units are intruded by the middle Miocene (11.5 ± 0.4 Ma) Marcapunta volcanic complex.

6.2.1 Metamorphic rocks

Excelsior Group (SD-e)

These are the oldest rocks, from the Lower to Middle Devonian, which exist near the mine area and are called "Excelsior Series" Mc Laughlin (1924).   These
formations are composed of gray to greenish-gray shales and phyllites with abundant intercalations of quartzites in thin beds.  They contain some levels with
oblique lamination, of decimetric scale as well as pluricentimetric slump folds.

These rocks are restricted to the heart of the Cerro de Pasco anticline.  Their thickness is greater than 300 m.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 32

6.2.2 Sedimentary Rocks

Mitu Group (Ps-m)

unit outcrops locally and discontinuously to the west of the mine, mainly on both margins of Andacancha creek, but also appearing south of Marcapunta hill.

Near Andacancha creek, the rocks of this group are made up of two sequences.  the first sequence is made up of polymictic conglomerates with particles and
sub-angular fragments that are cemented by a fine-grained sandstone matrix, which is brick red in color and found in medium to thick strata with cross bedding
and levels of fine sandstones; the thickness of the sequence cannot be defined.

In this area, the volcanic sequence is absent; according to the reviewed bibliography, this type of sequence is scarce in the western part of Cerro de Pasco.

The Mitu Group probably rests on the rocks of the Excelsior Group in unconformity and is also unconformably below the rocks of Pucará Group.  Its thickness
in the area is greater than ten meters.

Pucará Group or Western Pucará (TrJ-p)

This unit corresponds to undivided limestone rocks, which in the Project area are found with certain continuity in the hills west of the Colquijirca mine; outcrops
are visible on both margins of the San Juan River valley, from Sacrafamilia to Huaraucaca.

The rocks correspond to grayish limestones that present a smooth to undulating morphology in the area, with some karsts and, on rare occasions, with dolines.

Chambará Formation or Eastern Pucará (Tr-ch)

This unit is part of the Pucará group, mainly located in the Alma Huanusha hill, where limestones outcrop in a monotonous and massive form, bluish gray when
fresh and creamy gray when weathered; the limestones include irregularly shaped chert.

The contact of Chambará limestones with Mitu Group rocks is unconformable.

Pocobamba Formation (KT-po)

It is made up of three members:
● Caucan: Constituted by silty claystones that grades to limonites, red in color and sandstones with conglomeratic breccias, which are found in a
calcareous cement.
● Shuco: Corresponds to breccias made up of limestone clasts of subrounded to subangular shapes and some sparse lenses or levels of limolitic
sandstones.
● Calera or Calera Formation

Calera Formation (P-ca)

It is made up of marly dolomites, claystones with marls and limestones with abundant chert, followed by intercalations of claystones and marly limestones with
micritic nodules, ostracoids, bioclasts and rhizomorphs; in Colquijirca, in North Pit, it is 220 m thick and contains mineralization mantles currently being
exploited.   Its composition is dominated by carbonate rocks with limestone and, to a lesser extent, marl and siliceous rocks (Chert).   There are also thin
intercalations of silty clays strata and eventually tuffs in this member.  This unit corresponds to the Eocene period; on

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 33

the surface, it outcrops in a localized form, as it is deformed and covered by Quaternary deposits.  Ángeles (1992) divides this sequence into 3 stratigraphic
units:
● Lower Calera: This unit concordantly and progressively overlies the Shuco Formation and in some places their separation is not distinguishable; it
outcrops along Marcapunta Norte and Colquijirca (diamond drillholes and pit).  A model column indicates, towards the footwall, detrital sediments,
thick and thin packages of Pucara pebble conglomerates, of calcareous matrix intercalated with levels of rhyolitic tuffs that continues with a sequence
of volcano sedimentary sediments with lithic clasts of different granulometry included in a calcareous matrix and towards the top, ends with a
sequence of gray mudstone limestones with little pyroclastic influence.  This facies indicates a playa lake evolution with an abundant contribution of
detrital material (fluvial-volcanic) (Ángeles 1993).  It presents a thickness of approximately 64 to 80 m.
● Middle Calera: This unit concordantly overlies the lower horizon and is characterized by facies of mudstone, wackestone to grainstone limestones
with concretionary structures, bioturbation and rhizomorphs, which are gray in color and intercalated with thin levels of marls, silty clays, argillites and
isolated stretches of gray tuffs.  This facies assemblage indicates a shallow lake probably holomictic (Ángeles 1993).  It presents a thickness ranging
from 106 m (Tajo Principal) to 55 m (La Calera).
● Upper Calera: This unit concordantly overlies the middle horizon, it is characterized by a succession of limestones and gray marls with a strong level
of gray tuff, thin stretches of silty clays and claystones.   The calcareous horizons are massive, of gray and brownish colors, of mudstone and
wackestone textures with pressure microstructures (stylolites); the marly and silty clay horizons exhibit various shades of gray and are intercalated as
thin strata.  In the Colquijirca sector, the top of this horizon cannot be observed, so we estimate a thickness of 44 m.  The observed facies suggest a
lacustrine sedimentation environment with an isolated distal pyroclastic event (Ángeles 1993).

6.2.3 Volcanic Rocks

Marcapunta Volcanic Center (Mi)

The volcanic apparatus itself is essentially constituted by two lithological units (Vidal, 1984).  The earlier one, the "Unish tuffs", is composed of pyroclastics and
lavas.  The later one is characterized by dacitic to quartz-latite lava domes, which are collectively referred to as the "Marcapunta intrusive".  Vidal et, al.  dated
the lava domes at 11.5 ± 0.4 Ma, and the hydrothermal activity at 10.8 ± 0.3 Ma.

6.2.4 Intrusive rocks

Intrusive rocks occurring in the mine area belong to a stock-type intrusive body of dacitic composition, of hypabyssal nature, which is related to the origin of the
hydrothermal deposit.

In the Marcapunta hill, pyroclasts and lavas are affected or intruded by a dome of dacites and quartz latites, causing marginal breccias in the South and North
ends known as Marcapunta and San Gregorio.

The breccias are made up of mixtures of clasts from the sedimentary and metamorphic basement block and have an igneous matrix.

The igneous activity in Marcapunta hill evolved from a pyroclastic extrusive phase to a phase of endogenous lava-domes, at the end of which the marginal
breccias would have formed.  The lower eastern part of the hill is constituted by the intrusive body, however, the distribution of volcanic and intrusive rocks in
the body of the hill are not well defined and rocks are very altered and covered by cover materials.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 34

6.2.5 Quaternary Deposits (Q)

Covering the rock units described above are the Quaternary deposits described below:

Glacial Deposits (Q-gl)

These materials correspond to materials resulting from the ablation of ice on rocks; they are predominantly constituted by a poorly graded mixture of silts or
sandy clays with gravels and varying percentages of rock fragments of different sizes.  The grains and particles vary from sub angular to sub rounded, and the
lithological composition of the grains and clasts vary according to the place, depending on the proximity to outcropping rocks.  Fines content varies from slightly
to moderately plastic, ranging from compact to moderately compact.  Their thickness is very variable from place to place.

In the mine area, these deposits are found as cover of the described units and their thicknesses are not relevant; outside the mine they still preserve their
original forms of deposition in the form of moraines.
Fluvio-glacial Deposits (Q-fg)
These deposits have suffered some removal by rainfall and portion of their components have been eroded and/or saturated by water.

Their composition is dominated by sands and gravels, including silts and some rock fragments.  They are generally found with a certain continuity in the creek
areas, where they reach their greatest thickness; these materials are found in the Andacancha and Buena Vista creeks and in the vicinity of Colquijirca river,
which runs near Cerro Marcapunta.

Alluvial Deposits (Q-al)

These are materials transported and accumulated by the waters of the main flows such as the San Juan and Colquijirca rivers; they are made up of sand,
gravel, pebbles and present some boulders and fines; these materials are generally poorly graded, with predominantly subrounded to rounded shapes and a
lithological composition made up mostly of limestone, sandstone and a small percentage of igneous rocks.

These deposits are several meters thick and saturated near the creeks and San Juan River.  Alluvial deposits are part of the alluvial plain of San Juan River
from Huaraucaca to San Gregorio, they can be used as aggregate quarry.

Wetland Deposits (Q-bo)

These deposits are found at the bottom of some creeks, as well as in the contours or areas adjacent to lakes.  They are also found in localized form in some
gently inclined slopes, where drainage is poor or permanent water outcrops are present and the sandy-gravelly-silty soils contain high mountain hydrophytic
vegetation with variable organic matter content, which is dark gray to grayish-brown color.

Colluvial Deposits (Q-co)

These deposits are configured with materials from debris from old and/or recent slopes; they are made up of a mixture of rock fragments of different sizes with
or without fine matrixes and range from somewhat dense to loose with particles and grains that are predominantly angular shape.  In the mine area, they are
located in some places on the flanks of Cerro Marcapunta and in the upper parts of the hill range; in these places, they occur almost continuously and are
mainly in calcareous rocks.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 35

North Pit

Figure 6-3: Geologic map of the Colquijirca Mining District, showing the sectors: Tajo Norte, Tajo Sur and Marcapunta.
Source: Carlos Ángeles, 1993 (El Brocal, 2021)

6.2.6 Structural Context

Excerpted from (El Brocal, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 36

In the Colquijirca area, there are three longitudinal faults: Huachuacaja (with apparent strike-slip displacement); Cerro de Pasco (corresponding to a N-S
striking reverse fault); and a third, which follows the axial plane of the Mercedes-Chocáyoc anticline and marked by an apparent displacement of the east block
to the south (Figure 6-3).   The sedimentary strata are strongly folded, giving rise to the presence of anticlines and synclines.   The fold axes have an NNW
strike and a gentle dip of the axis to the south.

The most prominent lineaments in the district are two major regional north-south reverse faults, north-south fold trends and a slip fault system.  These include
the major north-trending longitudinal fault; a reverse fault, which passes through or near Cerro de Pasco and Marcapunta volcanic centers; and basin
morphology controlled during sedimentation of the Pucará and Calera Formation.  A second reverse fault of the pre-Marcapunta complex with NNW-SSE to
north-south direction passes west of the Colquijirca-Smelter deposits and emerges south of the volcanic complex.   Most of these structural elements are
related to Neogene compression events that affected extensive areas of the central and northern Peruvian Andes (Ángeles, 1999).

6.2.7 Property Geology

Excerpted from El Brocal, 2021

Due to the advance of stoping over the years, the Colquijirca deposit is currently exposed, which facilitates the geological identification of the Tertiary basin.
  Asymmetric anticlines and synclines composed of carbonate and detrital rocks, attributed to the Eocene-Oligocene Calera Formation, can be found and
considered as the host of mineralization.  The deposit also presents volcano-clastic intercalations (ash tuffs), which is evidence of volcanic activity that was
contemporaneous to sedimentation.  In addition, with the review of 5 drillholes, the Shuco conglomerate sequence of the upper Eocene has been identified in
depth, which underlies Lower Calera and overlies in depositional contact with the Mitú sandstones of the Permian-Triassic (Megard, 1978).   To the south, at
Smelter and Marcapunta, the sequence is uplifted and intruded by domes and dykes of dacitic composition due to the diatreme, which shows strong advanced
argillic alteration and is recognized as the focus of mineralization in the mining district.

The Marcapunta diatreme-dome complex, which is exposed in the center of the Colquijirca district (Sillitoe 2000; Bendezú et al.  2003; Sarmiento 2004), is one
of a series of Miocene volcanic edifices, including Cerro de Pasco and Yanamate (Figure 6-4).   It consists of multiple lava-dome intrusions of mainly dacitic
composition.  Injection and explosion breccias and pyroclastic layers, typical of diatreme conduits, are widely recognized at depth.  The inward-dipping normal
fault, located in peripheral areas suggests that the entire edifice collapsed, probably before the main mineralization episodes (Bendezú et al.  2003).

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 37

Figure 6-4:  Geologic map of the diatreme-dome complex at Cerro de Pasco

Source: Compiled from Rogers (1983) and Huanqui (1994).   (Baumgartner, Fontboté, & Vennemann, 2007)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 38

Figure 6-5:  The geologic and lithostratigraphic map of Tajo Colquijirca.

Source: (El Brocal, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 39

6.2.8 Structural Geology

Excerpted from (Ventura, 2020)

Structurally, the Tertiary basin composed of the Shuco conglomerate, and the Calera Formation has been controlled by the Major Longitudinal Fault located
east of the Tajo; Ángeles (1993) considered a thick active transtensional thrust sheet that controlled marine and continental sedimentary deposition since the
Triassic (Pucará Group), generating thrusting, graben and horst in time.   Therefore, it is inferred that during one of these tectonic events the Pucará was
uplifted and eroded, and that later in the Eocene it was filled by deposits of alluvial and fluvial fans and calcareous-detrital lacustrine sediments of the
Pocobamba and Calera Formation, overlying the Mitu in erosional unconformity.  Theedimentary sequence was later affected by the comprehensive tectonics
of the Upper Oligocene and Lower Miocene (22.5 ma,) generating folding and giving rise to the asymmetric anticlines and synclines recognized in the Tajo with
a NNW trend and with greater compression to the north; inverse faults subparallel to the bedding and low-angle faults with slight overthrusting (thrusting) of the
limestones of Middle Calera recognized in Flanco la Pampa are identified as well as small asymmetric and overturned folds (Figure 6‑6).  Very locally, trans-
Andean faults are identified with no infill except calcite crystals, but with dextral movement striations without major displacement, as well as E-W faults
(reactivated, last phase) infilled with gouge with sinistral movement striations that displace in a stepwise manner <1m.  

The Major Longitudinal Fault has been recognized near Cerro de Pasco with N165 orientation and 65°E dip where it contacts the Eastern Pucara with the
Pocobamba Formation.  Ángeles, 1993.

The main longitudinal faults in the mine area have axes almost parallel to the axis of the folds; there are also overthrusting faults and local normal faults (El
Brocal, 2021).   Structurally, El Brocal mining unit presents two main systems: The Andean trend system, N15º-45ºW and N45º-60ºE.   The latter are late
manifestations of local tectonics that show a dislocation in structural blocks generating horst and grabens that expose contrasting levels of adjacent blocks.
 Figure 6-6 shows a geologic and structural map of North Pit - Marcapunta.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 40

Figure 6-6:  Geologic and structural map of North Pit - Marcapunta.

Source:  (Ventura, 2020)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 41

6.3 Alteration

Excerpted from Bendezú et al., 2008

The generalized alteration of almost all the diatreme-dome complex consists of quartz - alunite - dickite - kaolinite ± (pyrophyllite - zunyite - illite) assemblages
in mineralized areas and kaolinite - illite ± (smectite) - sericite - chlorite - calcite outside the mineralized area.

The Marcapunta volcanic complex has been strongly altered to form residual quartz cores, locally vuggy, with advanced argillic alteration halos composed
mainly of quartz-alunite and kaolinite assemblages.  Gold and silver, which present mainly in veins and oxide coatings, are largely contained within these vuggy
quartz cores, which extend into the adjacent country rock.

The vuggy silica is divided into quartz-alunite and argillic alteration zones, which affects most of the Marcapunta volcanic rocks.   In several areas, quartz-
alunite alteration is observed to post-date Au-(Ag)-bearing veins, suggesting that several repeated episodes of silica-quartz-alunite vuggy alteration and Au-
(Ag) deposition took place at Marcapunta.

6.4 Mineralization
The district hosts two main types of epithermal mineralization: (1) disseminated high-sulfidation Au–(Ag) mineralization, hosted by volcanic rocks from the
Marcapunta complex, and (2) sulfide-rich Cordilleran polymetallic deposits hosted in the carbonate rocks of both the Pucará Group and the Pocobamba
Formation (Figure 6‑8).

6.5 High sulfidation Au-(Ag) epithermal.

Mineralization consists of oxide veinlets and disseminations hosted in vuggy silica. Typical gold and silver concentrations in vuggy silica are on the order of 0.2-
3 and 10-70 g/t, respectively (Vidal et al.  1997) and Ag/Au ratios vary from 10 to 30.

The deep parts of the vuggy silica contain unoxidized Au- (Ag) minerals, which are composed of less than 5% of disseminated sulfides by volume, and sulfide
veins composed mainly of pyrite-enargite, chalcocite, covellite and sphalerite with the presence of clays, mainly kaolinite, but also smectite and/or illite. The
vuggy silica and surrounding quartz-alunite zones, which do not have veinlets, contain minor amounts of Au-(Ag), suggesting that most of the precious metals
precipitated during veinlet formation.

6.5.1 Cordilleran Epithermal

A significant feature is the high total sulfide content, which fluctuates between an average 30 and 50% of the volume on average.   The most abundant
minerals are pyrite, which crystallized during an early silica-pyrite stage, followed by enargite-pyrite and, finally, late-stage chalcocite (Bendezú 2007).   The
strongly oxidized zones, originally composed of enargite-pyrite, show Ag/Au ratios ranging from 80 to 120, much higher than those found in the Au-(Ag)
minerals disseminated throughout Oro Marcapunta (10 to 20).   Another important characteristic of the Cordilleran type mineralization in the Colquijirca district
is the mineralogical zoning:

1) A Cu- (Au - Ag) core dominated by enargite and generally accompanied by alunite assemblages.

2) An intermediate Cu- (Zn - Pb - Ag - Bi) zone dominated by chalcopyrite, sphalerite and galena; and

3) An external Zn - Pb- (Ag) envelope composed mainly of sphalerite and galena.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 42

Cordilleran veins systematically cut the precious metal veins in the easternmost part of the Marcapunta Oeste project.  The quartz-alunite zones developed
during the high sulfidation epithermal event contain Au (Ag) veins, which were cut by pyrite-rich veinlets (enargite) generated during the Cordilleran event.  In
addition, most of the cavities within the vuggy silica contain intergranular enargite fillings from the Cordilleran stage, which in part destroy earlier Au-(Ag)
veinlets with quartz-alunite assemblages.

Another characteristic noted below for Colquijirca is that Cordilleran-type ores show notably higher Ag / Au ratios than high-sulfidation epithermal Au-(Ag)
mineralization.  

Figure 6-7:  Alunite samples from the Colquijirca zone.  

(A) Transmitted light micro-photograph of sample PBR-336 showing alunite in the Marcapunta high sulfidation epithermal gold mineralization.
(B) Photograph of an outcrop in southern Marcapunta where plumose alunite (sample PBR-273) cements Au-(Ag) with rounded clasts (up to 2 ppm Au) of vuggy silica formed from the epithermal
system.
(C) Small geode showing euhedral alunite intergrown with enargite and small amounts of pyrophyllite and pyrite, Cordilleran ore from Smelter (sample PBR-322).
(D) Photograph showing the effect of Cordilleran mineralization on volcanic rocks. A void left by former sanidine is filled by laminated euhedral alunite intergrown with quartz, pyrite and enargite; the
latter two are also found as veinlets and as coatings in cavities.
(E) Intimate intergrowth between alunite and sphalerite revealed by backscattered electron imaging of sample PBR-298 from the Cordilleran Colquijirca deposit.
(F) Backscattered electron imaging of PBR-208 sample showing the typical extremely fine-grained habit of alunite from the large Cordilleran San Gregorio deposit.

Source: (Bendezú, Page, Spikings, Pecskay, & Fonboté, 2008)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 43

Figure 6-8: Block diagram illustrating the spatial relationships between the Oro Marcapunta high sulfidation epithermal Au-(Ag) mineralization and
the Marcapunta Oeste, Smelter and Colquijirca Cordilleran base metal deposits

Source: (Bendezú, Page, Spikings, Pecskay, & Fonboté, 2008)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 44

Excerpted from El Brocal, 2021

The Colquijirca deposit exposes three zones.   The deepest part of the southwest sector of North Pit shows a core of tubular shape, which is essentially
constituted by enargite plus variable amounts of pyrite and quartz.  This core has an envelope composed of chalcopyrite and variable amounts of tennantite, in
addition to sphalerite and galena.   In turn, this envelope is surrounded by a relatively extensive zone composed of sphalerite and galena.   This last zone,
whose largest extension is towards the north of the district, constitutes the bulk of the Colquijirca deposit (North Pit) currently in exploitation (Figure 6-9).  To
the south of North Pit, the enargite core extends for more than 2 km becoming thicker and wider as it approaches the Marcapunta volcanic complex.

The sector called Marcapunta Norte, located immediately south of North Pit, is the extension of the Colquijirca deposit.  This sector is composed of two internal
zones: The first is composed of enargite and that the second of polymetallic nature, i.e., of chalcopyrite, tenantite, sphalerite and galena.   Unlike sectors
located further south, the Marcapunta Norte sector is characterized by the fact that it has undergone a process of supergene enrichment.  This process has
generated chalcocite bodies, which have been superimposed to the enargite zone and to a lesser degree, to the polymetallic zone composed of chalcopyrite,
tenantite, sphalerite and galena; this formed a sector of relative mineralogical complexity, especially in terms of intergrowths.

The mineralized structure of the Central Upper Mantle is hosted in carbonate rocks of the Middle Member of Calera Formation and has a sub-horizontal
stratiform geometry of N160° strike and 06N dip.  The structure has an approximate length of 520m, a width of 270 m and an average thickness of 21 m.  The
occurrence of structures secant to the bedding, such as breccia bodies and veins, is less common.

Mineralogically, the Central Upper Mantle consists essentially of enargite, accompanied by variable amounts of pyrite.  Less important phases include luzonite,
colusite and an even small quantity of occurrences of chalcocite, tenantite, ferberite and bismuthinite.

The Central Upper Mantle contains enargite-luzonite (Cu3AsS4) with grades varying between 1 and 3% Cu and 0.3 and 1% As.  Ag contents vary between 15
and 30 g/t.  Some internal sectors of the Central Upper Mantle show gold values between 0.3 and 0.7 g/t.  Gangue minerals include quartz, alunite, zunyite and
clays, mainly kaolinite, dickite, illite and smectite.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 45

Figure 6-9:  Mineralogy of Colquijirca deposit.

Source: (El Brocal, 2021)

6.5.2 Temporal evolution of mineralization at Colquijirca

Magmatic activity in the Cerro de Pasco area (between 15.4 and 15.1 Ma) was characterized by successive intrusions of diatremes, dacitic domes and quartz-
monzonite dykes (Baumgartner, Fontboté, & Vennemann, 2007).
The temporal evolution of mineralization at Colquijirca consists mainly of two stages:

● The first stage of mineralization was formed from a moderate salinity fluid formed by the mixture of magmatic water (end-member salinity ~ 10% wt
NaCl) and meteoric water.  According to Lacy (1949), in the paragenetic sequence of the first stage of mineralization, pyrite generations are found
(See Figure 6-10).
● Figure 6-11 shows the paragenetic sequence of the second stage (between 15.5 and 14.4 Ma, Baumgartner et al.,2007)), in case of Cordilleran base
metal replacement ore bodies.
● Figure 6-12 shows the paragenetic sequence of the second stage, in case of diatreme breccia-hosted veins.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 46

Figure 6-10: Paragenetic sequence for the first stage of mineralization (including observations by Bowditch 1935, Lacy 1949, and Einaudi 1968,
1977).

Source: (Baumgartner, Fontboté, & Vennemann, 2007)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 47

Figure 6-11:  Paragenetic sequence of Cordilleran base metal replacement ore bodies.  

Source: (Baumgartner, Fontboté, & Vennemann, 2007)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 48

Figure 6-12:  Paragenetic sequence of second-stage veins hosted in the diatreme breccia.  

Source: (Baumgartner, Fontboté, & Vennemann, 2007)

6.6 Deposit Type

The mineral deposits of the Colquijirca district belong to a member of the family of porphyry copper (Cu) related deposits known as Cordilleran deposits.  These
types of deposits, which are generally formed in the upper parts of a porphyry Cu, are fundamentally characterized by prominent zoning with internal parts that
are dominated by Cu and external zones where Zn, Pb and Ag are the main economically-interesting elements.   In the case of the Colquijirca district, and
specifically the area between the Marcapunta Norte and Colquijirca sectors, such zoning generally consists of three zones, which mineralogically consist
mainly of enargite in the internal parts; chalcopyrite in the intermediate parts; and sphalerite and galena in the external parts (El Brocal, 2021).

6.7 Cordilleran Deposits

Excerpted from Baumgartner et al., 2007

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 49

Cordilleran deposits have also been referred to as Butte-type vein deposits (Meyer et al.   1968), polymetallic veins and, recently, zoned base metal veins
(Einaudi et al.  2003).  

The term Cordilleran deposit was introduced by Sawkins (1972) and subsequently used by Einaudi (1982), Guilbert and Park (1985), Bartos (1987),
Macfarlane and Petersen (1990), Hemley and Hunt (1992), Bendezú and Fontboté (2002), Bendezú et al.   (2003) and Bendezú (2007) and Baumgartner
(2007).  The main characteristics of the Cordilleran base metal deposits can be summarized as follows (modified from Sawkins 1972 and Einaudi 1982):

1) Close association in time and space with calc-alkaline igneous activity, i.e., the same environment as most porphyry Cu and high sulfidation
epithermals.  Au - Ag deposits;

2) "Late" deposit in the evolution of the porphyry system (as seen in the abundant cross-cutting relationships and sparse geochronological data
subsequent to high sulfidation Au (-Ag), skarn and porphyry Cu deposits).

3) Deposition mainly under epithermal conditions at shallow levels below paleosurface;

4) Cu - Zn - Pb- (Ag - Au - Bi) metal assemblages, very rich in sulfides (up to more than 50% by weight of total sulfides);

5) Frequently, but not always, well-developed zoning of ore and alteration minerals, cores may show high sulfidation and, although commonly this is not
the case (see below), advanced argillic alteration assemblages;

6) Frequent early pyrite-quartz stages with low sulfidation assemblages containing pyrrhotite-(arsenopyrite) that can be extensive and form large bodies
zoned towards Zn-Pb minerals;Occurs mainly as open space filling (veins, breccia bodies) in silicate host rocks and as replacements in carbonate
rocks.

Figure 6-13:  Schematic cross section of the Colquijirca district showing the spatial and temporal distribution of the different deposit types

Source: (Bendezú & Fontboté, 2002)

Excerpted from Bendezú, Fontboté, & Cosca, 2003

In the Colquijirca district, the relative sequence of events and the absolute ages obtained establish that Cordilleran base metal lode and replacements ores,
which are mainly epithermal and formed

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 50

at high-sulfidation and oxidations states, were emplaced considerably later (~460,000 years) than the Au–(Ag) high-sulfidation epithermal mineralization  

Many classic districts known for their epithermal porphyry copper and/or Au- (Ag) deposits may host concentrations of "Cordilleran base metal veins" at any
spatial position upward from the porphyry environment.  These may occur at levels as shallow as the epithermal environment, which in carbonate rocks may be
characterized by fine-grained Zn-Pb mineralization.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 51

7 Exploration
Marcapunta Sur Oeste and San Gregorio are the most important exploration projects. The Marcapunta Sur Oeste project is a deposit of Cu-Au-As; it is
constituted by horizontal to sub-horizontal mantles and by irregular bodies of breccias, confined in a prospective horizon, whose thickness varies between 20 m
and 100 m.  It is located between the Mitu Group sediments at the base, and the dacitic volcanic rocks at the top (El Brocal, 2019)

Until 2012, several exploration campaigns were conducted, representing a total of 3,837m of underground workings.  Of these, 2,180m are access workings
(ramp), 1,657m are exploration drifts.

7.1 Exploration Work (Other Than Drilling)

For the purposes of this report and resource and reserve estimates, in SRK’s opinion, active mining, exploration drilling, and in-pit mapping provide the most
relevant and robust exploration data for the current Mineral Resources estimation.

7.1.1 Geological Mapping

Excerpted from (Ventura, 2020)

In 2020, a geological review of the Colquijirca pit was conducted.   This geological mapping covered 143 hectares and was carried out at a scale of 1:1000.  In
addition, 5 diamond drill holes located in the Colquijirca, Smelter and Marcapunta pits were surveyed to prepare stratigraphic columns.  The plan generated
from geological mapping is shown in Chapter 6 as part of the pit geology update.

Litho-stratigraphically, with the mapping and revision of drill holes in Tajo Colquijirca, Smelter and Marcapunta, seven units have been characterized: Mitu
sandstones, Mitu conglomerate, Shuco conglomerate sensu stricto, Shuco conglomerate in transition, Calera Inferior, Calera medio and last the Calera
superior.  Pucará limestone absent.

In the Colquijirca open pit, the Fm.  Calera Medio has been subdivided into two sequences: the favorable limestones for mineralization, with depths between 75
and 50m, and the unfavorable limestones that act as a ceiling for mineralization, with depths between 25 and 50m.

7.1.2 Geophysics

Excerpted from (Ellis Geophysical Consulting Inc., 2003)

In 2003, VDG del Perú S.A.C.  (VDG) on behalf of Sociedad Minera El Brocal, conducted a gravimetric survey over the Marcapunta property in and around the
Colquijirca mine.   This geophysical campaign was aimed at delineating the presence of semi-massive to massive sulfides by using gravity measurements.
  Diamond drilling completed during the last exploration campaigns has shown the presence of economic sulfide occurrences (mainly enargite and
chalcopyrite).   These sulfides have good specific density contrasts with the host rock, and the applied gravimetric method proved effective during the first
campaign completed in 2002.  In fact, during the 2002 survey, a ring-shaped gravity anomaly was described and the correlation between gravity maxima and
the presence of economic sulfides at depth was very noteworthy.  The anomaly remained open to the southeast, and the 2003 gravimetric survey aimed to fully
delineate the gravimetric anomaly boundary.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 52

In the gravimetric survey, 794 readings were taken on 37 lines.  The lines followed an azimuth of N56 ° E and were surveyed from 1500N to 4100S (Figure 7-
1).

The 2002 gravimetric survey found gravity anomalies over the mantles.  These anomalies continued to the south, suggesting the presence of mineralization.
  Gravimetric anomalies have been drilled and, based on the El Brocal experience, the strongest anomalies are associated with economic mineralization at
depth.

The 2002 filtered data defined the anomaly at Marcapunta as a crescent-shaped zone open to the east.  2003 data completed the map.  The Bouguer anomaly
map shows a C-shaped anomalous area with a small dip in its center (Figure 7-2).

Figure 7-1:  Image of the Marcapunta topography

Source: (Ellis Geophysical Consulting Inc., 2003)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 53

Figure 7-2:  Image of the residual complete Bouguer gravity for the Marcapunta Project.  
Red is high gravity and blue is low gravity. Major lines are shown in white, as identified in the gravity data superimposed on the residual complete Bouguer gravity.
Source: (Ellis Geophysical Consulting Inc., 2003)

7.2 Significant Results and Interpretation

SRK notes that the property is not at an early stage of exploration, and that results and interpretation if exploration data is generally supported in more detail by
extensive drilling and active mining exposure of the orebody in pits and underground works.

7.3 Exploration Drilling

In recent years, during 2019, 12,807 meters of diamond drilling were completed both on the surface and inside the mine.  Approximately 84% of this length
(10,768 meters) was drilled in the Marcapunta SW and Marcapunta SE (underground) zones to recategorize inferred to measured and indicated resources to
Cu-Ag ore reserves, yielding positive results with an increase in Au values.   Another 1,115 meters were drilled in 9 drill holes at Marcapunta Sur for
geometallurgical studies of arsenical copper ore.  

In 2020 to improve geological understanding; 22,816 m of diamond drilling were completed both on surface and inside the mine.  73% of this length (16,662 m)
was drilled in the Marcapunta Norte, Marcapunta SW and Marcapunta SE (underground) zones.  In addition, 25% of this length corresponds to drilling in Tajo
Norte.  Another 352 m were drilled in 2 drill holes at Marcapunta Sur for geometallurgical studies of mixed copper ore. At Marcapunta Norte, an underground
mine, 2,327.5 meters of development mine workings and 6,896.8 meters of preparation workings were completed, totaling 9,224.3 meters.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 54

7.3.1 Drilling Surveys

Buenaventura’s surveying department is responsible for applying to the collar surveying method to diamond drillholes.  To conduct these studies, a total station
or differential GPS is used to guarantee the accuracy and tolerance levels required for positioning purposes.
Table 7-1:  Table DDH campaigns in El Brocal
Number of Metres
Type Operator
Drillholes

Drilled (m)
1969 DDH Buenaventura 2 759.90
1980 DDH Buenaventura 5 1,001.30
1981 DDH Buenaventura 8 1,723.79
1984 DDH Buenaventura 15 1,743.25
1985 DDH Buenaventura 27 3,712.80
1987 DDH Buenaventura 19 2,469.15
1988 DDH Buenaventura 20 2,793.55
1989 DDH Buenaventura 25 3,075.30
1990 DDH Buenaventura 12 1,126.60
1992 DDH Buenaventura 2 391.45
1994 DDH Buenaventura 35 556.00
1995 DDH Buenaventura 96 19,406.02
1996 DDH Buenaventura 120 25,258.76
1997 DDH Buenaventura 10 1,632.00
1998 DDH Buenaventura 37 5,220.60
2000 DDH Buenaventura 14 1,271.35
2002 DDH Buenaventura 18 3,667.05
2003 DDH Buenaventura 37 13,279.60
2004 DDH Buenaventura 12 1,601.75
2005 DDH Buenaventura 41 8,130.35
2006 DDH Buenaventura 93 23,524.90
2007 DDH Buenaventura 258 71,864.70
2008 DDH Buenaventura 213 43,472.20
2009 DDH Buenaventura 31 2,366.35
2010 DDH Buenaventura 48 4,021.20
2011 DDH Buenaventura 62 4,634.85
2012 DDH Buenaventura 55 5,862.20
2013 DDH Buenaventura 40 3,734.50
2014 DDH Buenaventura 52 17,001.25
2016 DDH Buenaventura 76 11,735.50
2017 DDH Buenaventura 365 14,463.10
2018 DDH Buenaventura 602 44,916.15
2019 DDH Buenaventura 426 27,635.55
2020 DDH Buenaventura 329 23,997.70
2021 DDH Buenaventura 176 17,627.80
Total 3,381.00 415,678.52

Source: Buenaventura, 2021

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 55

Figure 7-3:  Property Drill Collar Location (2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 campaigns)
Source: SRK, 2021

7.3.2 Sampling Methods and Sample Quality

The ore body is sampled through diamond drilling programs.   The drill patterns, collar spacing, and hole diameter are guided by geological and geostatistical
requirements to bolster the reliability of geological interpretation and the confidence of estimation in Mineral Resources block models.

Drill core samples provide information on intact geological contact relationships, mineralogical associations, and structural conditions.

The following is considered during core cutting: first, samples are extracted for density, Terraspec (Pima), as well as other special samples such as point
loading and petrography; the entire sample interval will be considered.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 56

In general, sample intervals should be no less than 30cm in length to ensure that the sample is more representative and to serve as a basis for the modeling
domain.  If the mineralized structure is less than 30 cm, the sample must be proportionally completed with wall rock.

The sample obtained from the drill hole is cut into two equal parts using diamond disc cutters (saws) or a “guillotine” splitter when the sample needs to be cut
dry; one half of the core becomes the sample, and the other half will be placed in a box for storage.

Drillings conducted in the campaigns have NQ and HQ diameters.  After completing the execution of the drillholes, the drilling code is marked as a milestone
that symbolizes the collar position.

7.3.3 Downhole Surveying

Inclined drill holes (0-89°) use a mechanical device used to measure orientation in space.   The orientation measurement is calculated through a magnetic
survey that uses Reflex and a Gyroscope.

The equipment has a calibration certificate and certified data.   Vertical drill holes (90°) and those shallower than 50m are not required to have a survey
certificate.

7.3.4 Geological Logging

All cores are logged by the company under the supervision of El Brocal geologists, and all data is collected through GVMapper software, which is adapted with
the unit's own geological codes and allows for much faster logging.  

7.3.5 Diamond Drilling Sampling

In SRK’s opinion, and many agree, diamond drill holes (DDH) generate the most authoritative and representative sampling of subsurface materials available.
 Diamond core is collected in trays marked with hole identification and down hole depths at the end of each core run.

Core recovery is generally above 95%.  For drill core sampling, a symmetrical line is drawn along the core for cutting.  The core sampling interval for chemical
assays ranges from 0.3 meters to 1.5 meters, considering geological contacts as well as mineralogical variations.

In SRK's opinion, recovery and sampling of drill cores is suitable for resource estimation purposes.  

7.3.6 Drilling Type and Extent

Drilling operations at the project are mainly DDH type.   Several campaigns have been carried out throughout the project’s property.   Drill holes have been
drilled at different orientations and inclinations.  

7.3.7 Drilling, Sampling, or Recovery Factors

SRK has no knowledge of any material drilling factors that may affect the results.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 57

8 Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security

The procedures for sampling, sample preparation, analysis and quality control for diamond drilling samples are described in this section.

8.1 Sample Preparation Methods and Quality Control Measures

8.1.1 Sampling

Sampling is performed under the supervision of the field and/or ore control geologist.  The core is removed from the core barrels at the rig and placed into core
boxes and transported to the logging facility at the end of each drilling shift.  

Drillhole sampling is performed at the core storage facility located in the mining unit. Prior to sampling, the core is cut lengthwise into two halves by an
automatic core saw, following the cutting line that has been marked by the geologist.  The cut core is placed back in the core box. Next, the core boxes are
placed on the sampling tables in an orderly fashion.   Sampling is done at intervals no less than 0.3m. Each sample ticket has three tags, and the sample
interval and QA/QC codes are noted on the ticket.  Two sample tags and one half of the sawn core sample are placed in a polyethylene bag, and the other tag
is stapled to the outside of the polyethylene bag. The other half of the sample remains in the core box. After completing the sampling of each drill hole, samples
are placed in large sacks for their transportation to the internal laboratory or sent to an external laboratory.

For density sampling, representative samples based on geology and mineralization units are selected. Density core samples have a length of 15 to 20 cm and
are taken at 5 m intervals along the drillhole, whether it is a mineralized zone or not. The samples are wrapped in plastic film and then tagged.  The geologist
creates a database with all tagged samples collected and this information is sent to the geology database manager and subsequently recorded on the density
sample form.   The technician in charge of density measurement photographs the sample outside the core box, which is sent to the internal or external
laboratory for density determination.   Once the results are obtained, the samples are saved in their respective locations, the results are uploaded to the
database and the reports are stored.

8.1.2 Sample Preparation

El Brocal Internal Laboratory performs the following sample preparation processes (Figure 8-1): First the tagged samples are received and placed in trays.  The
samples are dried in the furnace at a temperature between 60°C - 100°C.  Subsequently, the samples are transported to the crusher, which was previously
cleaned by crushing a barren material such as quartz. The sample is crushed until 90% passing -10 mesh (2 mm). Then, the samples are homogenized by
using the Jones riffle splitter, and are reduced through successive divisions until obtaining a sample of approximately 400 g.   Later, the pulverizing equipment
and discs are cleaned using barren quartz sand and compressed air.  Samples are pulverized until 95% passing -140 mesh (106 µm).  Finally, the pulverized
sample is divided into two subsamples of 200 g each, one of which is sent for chemical analysis and the other, stored as pulp to be returned to the geology
department for storage.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 58

Figure 8-1:  Sample Preparation Diagram

Source: BVN - Sampling Manual, 2020

The Certimin Laboratory (current external laboratory) performs the following sample preparation processes: The supervisor receives, orders and check the
samples (quantity, state of containers, codes) according to the analysis request.  After that a batch code is created, and the data described in the service
request is entered.   Later, the samples are weighed and registered in the LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System) and/or in a weighing format.
  Then, the samples are dried at a temperature of 100°C +/- 10°C, 60°C +/- 10°C, or according to the client's request.   Subsequently, the samples have a
primary crushing to better than 90% passing a 1/4" mesh (6.3 mm).  After that, the samples have a secondary crushing to better than 90% passing # -10 mesh
(2 mm).  Then, the samples are split using a riffle splitter to obtain a sample weight of 200 to 300 g.  (The rest of the sample is stored as reject).  Later, the
samples are pulverized until 85% passing -200 mesh (75 µm).  Finally, the laboratory reviews the results of the internal quality control in the

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 59

sample preparation and if the results are satisfactory, the pulp is retained for the respective chemical analysis.

Density sample preparation includes the following processes: First, the electronic balance is calibrated, then the weight of the initial sample is taken.   The
samples are placed in the drying oven at a temperature of 105°C. The samples are weighed every 30 minutes until a constant weight is obtained (thus
obtaining the drying time). Buenaventura uses the wax-coated water immersion method (paraffin method) to determine density in the geological units.   In
argillic areas with crumbly material or in highly fractured areas, the density will be determined using the pycnometer.

8.1.3 Chain of Custody

The chain of custody is supervised by mine geologists and consists of the following procedure: Samples are grouped in consecutive order and placed into
sacks, which are subsequently transported to the Internal Laboratory, where the dispatch order is provided (which includes the analysis method to be used,
sample quantity, etc.) and the receipt of samples is entered in the database.  

In case of deliveries outside the mining unit, constant communication with the shipper is required to monitor the sample transfer, and custody personnel will be
available in the transport unit.  After the delivery of the samples to the external laboratory, the sample submission and the chain of custody forms will be
provided, and these documents shall be signed by the person responsible for receiving the samples.  The results are issued by the laboratory through digital
reports and are received by the database administrator of the mining unit, who will validate that information.

8.2 Sample Preparation, Assaying and Analytical Procedures

El Brocal mine samples have been analyzed at the onsite El Brocal Internal Laboratory, and at the External Laboratories ACTLABS, CERTIMIN, and ALS, as
summarized in the Table 8-1:
Table 8-1:  Distribution of samples analyzed according to the laboratory and sampling period
Sample Type Laboratory 1969 - 2000 2002 - 2010 2011 - 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total Samples
Unidentified
29,093 20,142 2,418 0 73 18 17 1 51,762
Laboratory
SMEB* 18,273 14,255 7,158 6,850 11,150 11,897 2,143 6,469 94,688
Drillhole ACTLABS 0 17,531 2,613 1,258 5,971 0 0 0 27,373
ALS 0 0 1,162 0 12,037 6,183 6,598 0 25,980
CERTIMN 0 7,985 1,416 0 0 0 6,420 25,668 29,436
        Total 224,799
Source: SRK, 2021
(*) SMEB: El Brocal Internal Laboratory

El Brocal Internal Laboratory is located in El Brocal Mining Unit (Pasco) and started operations in 1985 and has ISO 9001:2015 certification.

Samples sent to the External Laboratory ALS (Peru) are chemically analyzed at the main headquarters located in Lima (ALS Lima).   This laboratory is
internationally recognized and has ISO/IEC 17025:2017 certification.

The samples sent to the External Laboratory CERTIMIN (Peru) are chemically analyzed at the main headquarters located in Lima.   This laboratory is
recognized and has ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015, and ISO 45001:2018 certifications.

External laboratories ALS, Certimin, ACTLABS were and are independent of Buenaventura.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 60

8.2.1 Sample Analysis

El Brocal Internal Laboratory performs the following sample analysis processes.

● Samples are received and weighed.  
● For total gold analysis (FAAAS), samples are melted, cupellated, and then subjected to gravimetric analysis.
● For samples tested for multiple elements, wet digestion of samples and instrumental analysis are performed: Ag (AASP) / Cu (AASP) / Fe (AASP) /
Pb (AASP) / Zn (AASP) / As (AASP) / Bi (AASP).
● If the results obtained comply with laboratory quality control standards, the assay certificate is prepared and issued.
The analytical procedures followed by the current laboratories are shown in Table 8-2 and Table 8-3.
Table 8-2:  Analytical methods used at El Brocal Internal Laboratory
Element Method Lower limit Upper limit Method description
Au FAAAS 0.01 ppm 10 ppm Fire Assay - Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy finish
Ag 0.01 oz/t 100 oz/t
Cu 0.01% 10%
Pb 0.01% 10%
Zn AASP 0.01% 10% Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy - Perchloric digestion
Fe 0.01% 50%
Bi 0.01% 10%
As 0.01% 10%
Cu VOLCU 10% 100%
Pb VOLPB 10% 100% Volumetric
Zn VOLZN 10% 100%
Source: SRK, 2021

Table 8-3:  Analytical methods used at CERTIMIN External Laboratory

Element Method Lower limit Upper limit Method description
Au IC-EF-01 0.005 ppm 10 ppm Fire Assay - Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy finish
Au IC-EF-10 2 ppm 10,000 ppm Fire Assay - Gravimetric finish
Multielemental Analysis
Ag IC-VH-59 0.1 ppm 100 ppm - ICP-OES, ICP-MS
- Four Acid Digestion
Cu 0.5 ppm 10,000 ppm
Fe 0.01% 15%
Pb 0.5 ppm 10,000 ppm
Zn 0.5 ppm 10,000 ppm
Multielemental Analysis
Ag IC-VH-134 1 ppm 1,000 ppm ICP-OES
- Four Acid digestion
Cu 0.001% 50%
Pb 0.001% 20%
Zn 0.001% 30%
Fe 0.01% 50%
Ag IC-EF-15 100 ppm 10,000 ppm Fire Assay - Gravimetric finish
PbOx IC-VH-C022 0.01% 10% Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
ZnOx 0.01% 10%
Source: SRK, 2021

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 61

8.3 Quality Control Procedures/Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance and Quality Control procedures included the insertion of blank control samples, duplicates and standard reference materials to monitor
sampling, sample preparation and analytical processes.

8.3.1 Insertion Rate

Buenaventura initiated a QAQC program by inserting control samples in drill holes (2007-2021).  The control sample insertion program performed on drill hole
samples shows an overall insertion rate of 17.7%.  The Table 8-4 summarizes the insertion ratio by sample type, period and laboratories.
Table 8-4:  El Brocal Control Sample Insertion Rate.
#
# Primary Insertion
Drillhole Type Period Laboratory Blanks Duplicates Standard Control
samples
Ratio (%)
Samples
# (%) # (%) # (%)
Diamond drilling 1969-2012 No Lab 51,762
1985-2006 SMEB* 24,494
2003, 2006-2012 CERTIMIN 9,401 No control samples were inserted
2005-2008 ACTLABS 17,475
Reverse circulation 2006 ACTLABS 56
Total 103,188  
Diamond drilling 2007-2021 SMEB 53,701 2,934 5.5% 4,292 8.0% 1,871 3.5% 9,097 16.9%
2016-2018 ACTLABS 9,842 543 5.5% 823 8.4% 331 3.4% 1,697 17.2%
2016-2020 ALS 23,680 1,391 5.9% 1,996 8.4% 716 3.0% 4,103 17.3%
2020 ALS1** 2,300 135 5.9% 204 8.9% 68 3.0% 407 17.7%
2020-2021 CERTIMIN 32,088 1,921 6.0% 2,865 8.9% 1,377 4.3% 6,163 19.2%
Total 121,611 6,924 5.7% 10,180 8.4% 4,363 3.6% 21,467 17.7%
(*) SMEB: El Brocal Internal Laboratory
(**) For the QAQC evaluation, an additional item was created for ALS Laboratory ("ALS1") for having a different limit of detection in 2020.
Source: SRK, 2021

8.3.2 Evaluation of Control Samples

To evaluate control samples (QC), SRK has applied the following criteria:

1. To evaluate contamination (blank samples), SRK considers the presence of blank samples with assay results exceeding 10 times the lower limit of
detection (10 x LLD).  The acceptance limit for SRK is 90% of samples under 10 x LLD;

2. To evaluate accuracy (standards), SRK uses the limit conventionally accepted by the industry, which is: all standard control samples outside the range of
Best Value (BV) ± 3 Standard Deviation (SD), or adjacent samples between the limits of BV+3SD and BV+2SD, or between BV-3SD and BV-2SD are
considered as samples outside the acceptable limits.  For SRK, 90% of samples must be within the acceptance limits; and

3. To evaluate precision (duplicates), SRK compares and applies the HARD index (half of the absolute relative difference) to each original-duplicate sample
pair.  SRK considers the acceptable the precision evaluation, as follows:

● For field duplicates, the acceptable HARD value is < 30%.  

● For coarse duplicate samples the acceptable HARD value is < 20%.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 62

● For duplicate pulp or check assay samples the acceptable HARD value is < 10%.
SRK made an analysis from the historical to recent quality control samples, the summary of the observations found are shown below in the Table 8-5:
Table 8-5:  Observations found in the QC analysis.
Laboratory Period Sample Type QC Type Findings
SMEB 2007-2021 Drill hole Blanks There is no evidence of cross-contamination
Ag accuracy is acceptable for SRK.  But in Au, Cu, Pb and Zn the accuracy is poor.
 The results obtained in the following standards have low percentage of acceptance:
OREAS 94 (Ag, Pb), OREAS 161 (Ag, Cu), GBM³01-5 (Cu, Pb, Zn), MAT-3 (Pb),
STRT-01 (Au, Pb), STRT-02 (Au, Cu), GBM997-8 (Pb, Zn), and are not at acceptable
Standards limits for SRK.  
Bias results are variable: In Au, Ag and Cu samples the bias is acceptable.  But in Pb
and Zn samples the bias is outside acceptance limits.  SRK observed that Zn bias is
elevated because the best value of the standards is close to the lowest limit of
detection of the internal laboratory.
Au, Ag, Cu, and Pb results are acceptable, except for Pb fine duplicates, where the
Duplicates percentage of acceptable samples is low.   Zn duplicates’ results are outside SRK’s
acceptance limit.
ACTLABS 2017-2018 Drill hole Blanks There is no evidence of cross-contamination.
Cu and Zn accuracy is acceptable for SRK.  But in Ag and Pb results, the accuracy is
low.   The results obtained for the following standards indicate low percentages of
acceptance: MCL-01 (Ag), MCL-03 (Ag), OXHYO-03 (Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn), MAT-3 (Au,
Standards Cu, Pb, Zn), and are not at acceptable limits for SRK.
Bias results are variable: In Cu and Zn, 80% of the samples have results within
acceptance limits but in the case of Ag and Pb results, the bias is outside acceptance
limits.  
Cu results show an acceptable precision.  But in Ag, Pb and Zn the precision is poor,
Duplicates
and the results are not at acceptable limits for SRK.
Blank control samples results for Au, Ag, Pb, and Zn are within acceptable limits. Cu
ALS 2017-2020 Drill hole Blanks results for coarse blanks TR-17131 and TR-18136 (2018-2019) are outside
acceptable limits.
The Au, Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn accuracy is acceptable.  The following standards register
a low percentage of acceptance: MLC-03 (Cu, Pb, Zn), STRT-03 (Au, Cu), STRT-04
Standards
(Cu) and PLSUL27 (Pb).
Bias is within acceptable limits for SRK.
Results for Au, Ag, Cu, and Pb show acceptable precision for SRK.   In Zn, the
Duplicates
precision is poor, and the results are not at acceptable limits for SRK.  
ALS1 2020 Drill hole Blanks There is no evidence of cross-contamination.
The Au, Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn accuracy is acceptable.  The following standards have a
Standards low percentage of acceptance: STRT-03 (Au) and STRT-04 (Cu, Zn).
Bias is within acceptable limits for SRK.
Au, Ag, Cu, and Pb duplicates results shows good precision, except for Ag field
Duplicates duplicates that has a low percentage of acceptable samples.  In Zn, the precision is
low, and the results are not at acceptable limits for SRK.
CERTIMIN 2020-2021 Drill hole Blanks There is no evidence of cross-contamination.
Au, Ag, and Pb accuracy is within acceptable limits for SRK.  But in Cu and Zn the
accuracy is low.   The results obtained for the following standards indicate a low
Standards
percentage of acceptance for Cu (STRT-02, STRT-03 and STRT-04) and Zn (STRT-
02) and are not at acceptable limits for SRK.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 63

Laboratory Period Sample Type QC Type Findings

Bias results are within acceptable limits in Au, Ag, Cu and Pb.  In the Zn results of
the standard STRT-01, the bias is not at acceptable limits and accuracy is
questionable.  
Ag, Cu, Pb and Zn show good precision, except for the Ag field duplicated, which has
Duplicates a low percentage of acceptable samples.  Au duplicated results are not at acceptable
limits for SRK.
Source: SRK, 2021

8.4 Opinion on Adequacy

SRK has conducted a comprehensive review of the available QA/QC data as part of the sample preparation, analysis, and security review.  SRK believes that
the QA/QC protocols are currently consistent with accepted industry best practices.
The insertion of control samples to validate contamination, precision and accuracy of the database is being performed regularly since 2007.  SRK observed
that the rate of standards control samples in drill holes is less than the rate indicated in Buenaventura's protocol.
Based on SRK criteria for QA/QC review:
There are no evident signs of cross-contamination except for Cu results in coarse blanks sent to ALS external laboratory during the period 2018-2019.  
In the precision evaluation, error rates of field, coarse, and pulp duplicates have been highly variable: In ALS external laboratory (ALS and ALS1), the precision
is good por Au, Ag, Cu, and Pb, evidencing good repeatability for sample preparation and analysis; however, the results obtained in Zn duplicates are not at
acceptable limits.  At Certimin external laboratory the precision is good for Ag, Cu, Pb and Zn, but in Au, the precision is poor.  At ACTLABS Laboratory the
precision for Ag, Pb and Zn is poor, only the results of Cu duplicates are acceptable.  At El Brocal internal laboratory, the precision is acceptable for Au, Ag and
Cu but in Pb, the results of fine duplicates show poor precision and in Zn, the results for duplicates are not at acceptable limit for SRK.  SRK suggests following
up on the Au duplicates’ result from Certimin External Laboratory and on the Zn duplicates’ results from the Internal Laboratory (SMEB) in particular, which
behave variably.  
Regarding the accuracy analysis, the performance of the standard reference materials over the years has been highly variable: ALS External Laboratory (ALS
and ALS1) has good accuracy.   Certimin External Laboratory has acceptable accuracy form Au, Ag and Pb, while for Cu and Zn the accuracy is poor.   In
ActLabs Laboratory (2017) and El Brocal Internal Laboratory the accuracy is poor and should be followed up on for corrective action.
In SRK's opinion, sample preparation, chemical analysis, quality control, and security procedures at El Brocal have historically shown that there may be issues
with accuracy and precision of results to support the estimation of measured Mineral Resources and proven reserves, especially for areas characterized by
analyses at the El Brocal Internal Laboratory.  Therefore, SRK has considered the QAQC analysis results as a risk in the classification of Mineral Resources
and reduced overall classification accordingly as discussed in Section 11.5.10 of this report.
SRK recommends increasing the insertion rate of standard samples in drill holes to ensure a correct accuracy analysis sorted into high, medium and low-grade
standards.
SRK recommends carefully monitoring the behavior of analytical results obtained in quality control samples to inform the internal/external laboratory of any
problems detected, if any, for immediate correction.

8.5 Non-Conventional Industry Practice

Buenaventura uses conventional industry practices for the preparation and analysis of samples.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 64

9 Data Verification
Buenaventura uses a systematic database program (acQuire) to store data and ensure data integrity.  Buenaventura provided the collar, survey, assay, sample,
density, lithology, alteration, geotechnical data in editable formats (csv, xls) to SRK for verification procedures.  

SRK’s data verification consists of:

● Reception of information provided by Buenaventura.
● Organizing information into a database in Microsoft Access
● Data modeling (relationships among tables)
● Construction of samples tracking table (dispatch information)
● Compilation of laboratory assay reports and link with the samples database
● Creation of an occurrence table in the assay cross validation.
● The following is validated for logging information:
o Overlapping of intervals
o Negative intervals
o Intervals larger than the total depth ("Td") of the drill hole
o Data does not extend to the Td of the drill hole
o Blank collar coordinates
o Downhole survey greater than the Td of the drill hole
o Drillholes lacking downhole Surveys
o No downhole data
o The downhole survey data deviates greater than 20 degrees (azimuth) or 10 degrees (inclination)

9.1 Internal data validation

Buenaventura uses a systematic database program (acQuire) that ensures data integrity and reduces data entry error by implementing requirements and
procedures to record data through SIGEO (BVN internal database software) and GVMapper.  A visual validation is conducted by Buenaventura's geologist prior
to data entry.  However, Buenaventura does not have a documented procedure for internal database verification.  SRK suggests developing a procedure that
contemplates rules for: appropriate data entry; identification of inconsistencies or errors; and subsequent corrective actions.

9.2 External data validation

External validation was performed by SRK in early 2021, which consisted of reviewing drillhole locations; downhole surveys; and comparing the grades versus
the original assay certificates from the internal and external laboratories.  SRK uses data check routines to validate overlapping intervals, negative (inverted)
intervals; drill holes lacking important information such as lithology, recovery or sampling; and lengths in logging or assays that are greater than the total depth
of the drillhole.

9.3 Data Verification Procedures

SRK has reviewed the information provided by Buenaventura, which consisted or 3,685 diamond drillholes (224,743 samples) and 3 reverse circulation
drillholes (56 samples) totaling 3,688 collars and 224,799 samples (Table 9-1).

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 65

Table 9-1:  Summary of drilling information provided by Buenaventura.  

Type No. of Collars Total length (m) Samples
Diamond drilling 3,685 453,444.4 224,743
Reverse circulation 3 668.0 56
Total 3,688 454,112.4 224,799
Source: SRK, 2021

9.3.1 Database Validation

SRK validated the main tables of the database.  The procedures applied in the database validation and the observations found are summarized in the Table 9-
2.
Table 9-2:  Database validation summary
Tables Comments
SRK plotted the drillholes to check their spatial location and it was verified that none of the drillholes are located very far from the
Collar
zone of influence of the mine. All data is adequate; no observations were found.
SRK verified that there are no collars with inverted inclination or significant variations in azimuth and inclination: 167 drill holes were
Survey found to have azimuth deviation greater than 20°; all of these drillholes have an inclination close to 90° (vertical) so this deviation is
acceptable.
SRK verified that the samples do not overlap in intervals and that there are no samples with intervals greater than the total collar
Samples
depth. All data is adequate; no observations were found.
A total of 12,828 density samples were analyzed at the El Brocal Internal Laboratory and 1,193 samples were analyzed at ACTLABS
Density
External Laboratory, both using the paraffin method. All provided data is adequate; no observations were found.
SRK verified that there are no overlapping intervals, negative intervals, and intervals greater than the total drill hole depth; the data is
Lithology adequate. SRK found that 207 drillholes have no lithology information; these drillholes correspond to historical information (1980-
2007).
SRK checked to see if there are missing intervals of RQD information; overlapping intervals; or intervals with RQD information greater
Recovery and RQD
or less than the drillhole length. All data is adequate; no observations were found.
Source: SRK, 2021

9.3.2 Assay Validation

In order to perform the assay cross validation, SRK linked the database with a compilation of assay certificates from laboratories (ALS, ACTLABS, CERTIMIN,
and El Brocal Internal Laboratory) in CSV and XLS format.  The observations found are summarized in the Table 9-3.
Table 9-3:  Observations found in the Assay Cross Validation
%

Assay Cross Validation
Total Total
Laboratory Samples Database Verification
(Database vs.
Comments
Certificate Grades)

SRK could not check these

No Laboratory 51,762 23.0% Samples with no laboratory identified.
samples.
24,975 samples, which reported very low assay results in
the certificate of analysis, were replaced in the Database
SRK verified 85.3% of the
SMEB 78,195 34.8% by a value close to the limit of detection of the element
samples.
(Au=0.005 ppm, Ag=0.005oz, Cu, Pb, Zn, PbO, and
ZnO=0.005%), but this was deemed immaterial.
No analysis extension certificates were provided for 5,618
samples.
SRK verified 98.5% of the No analysis extension certificates were provided for 82
ACTLABS 27,373 12.2%
samples. PbO and ZnO samples.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 66

%
Total

Total Assay Cross Validation

Laboratory

Samples

Database
Verification
(Database vs.
Comments

Certificate Grades)
No analysis extension certificates were provided for
15,364 samples.
249 samples, which reported very low assay results in the
SRK verified 100.0% of the certificate of analysis, were replaced in the Database by a
ALS 25,980 11.5%
samples. value close to the limit of detection of the element, but this
deemed immaterial.
No analysis extension certificates were provided for 99
samples.
In 525 PbO and ZnO samples (with very low assay results
SRK verified 99.8% of the on Certificate) were replaced in the Database by a value
CERTIMIN 41,489 18.5%
samples. close to the limit of detection of each element, but this
was deemed immaterial.
No analysis extension certificates were provided for 1,368
samples (1,177 in Cu).
Total 224,799 100.0%
Source: SRK, 2021

In the cross validation of the assay information, SRK found that certain values in the Database do not match the Laboratory assay certificates; however, the
total number of affected samples stood at 656 (0.3% of total samples), which is considered insignificant and do not have a material impact on the Mineral
Resources Estimation

9.4 Limitations
SRK was unable to perform the cross validation of 11,991 samples (5.3% of total samples) because the original assay certificates were not available by the
delivery deadline given to Buenaventura.   Additionally, 51,762 samples (23% of total samples) could not be validated because the laboratory certificate was
not identified.  Most of these samples correspond to historical information (1969-2012) located in areas that have been already mined and not deemed material
to the disclosure of Mineral Resources.

9.5 Opinions and recommendations on database quality

SRK has noted that the database contains historical information with no laboratory certificates, which means that cross validation could not be performed on
this information.  In SRK's opinion, the remaining information that could be validated is consistent and acceptable for Mineral Resources Estimation.

SRK has observed that the database has a number of minor findings or inconsistencies, the vast majority of which correspond to historical information obtained
from data migration.  Although a complete reconciliation of the certificate information to the digital database could not be completed, SRK notes that most of the
current resource is supported by contemporary information that could be compared to original certificate information.  The incidence of error for the data that
could be compared was limited and not deemed material to the disclosure of Mineral Resources.  

SRK recommends performing an internal validation procedure for the Buenaventura Database Management System (SIGEO), making a checklist of the data
export processes, and issuing Internal Laboratory analytical certificates for future estimations.   SRK also recommends improving the internal database
management system for auditing purposes to ensure the availability of sufficient information for data traceability.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 67

10 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

10.1 Ore Supply

El Brocal’s mineral processing facilities include two independent conventional flotation plants.  Plant 1 processes copper ore while Plant 2 processes lead and
zinc ores. Plant 1 receives ore from Marcapunta mine, and Plant 2 receives fresh ore from Tajo Norte mine and low silver content ore from Marcapunta, see
Table 10- 1 and Figure 10-1.

For the period 2017 to November 2020, the combined plants processed approximately 22.8 million tons of fresh ore, which is equivalent to an average of 5.7
million per year or 15,600 tons per day (approximately) when considering 365 days per annum.  The plants’ combined nominal capacity is 18,000 tons per day.
Table 10-1:  El Brocal, Mill Feed Sourcing, 2017 to 2020 November Period
Marcapunta Tajo Norte
Parameter Units
Global
Mine Mine

Fresh Ore Tonne 10,174,640 12,591,011 22,765.651

Ore Grade Ag oz/tonne 0.67 1.27 1.00
Ore Grade Cu% 1.76% 0.00% 0.79%
Ore Grade As% 0.58% 0.00% 0.26%
Ore Grade Fe% 16.82% 16.65% 16.73%
Ore Grade Au g/tonne 0.54 0.00 0.240
Ore Grade Pb% 0.00% 1.16% 0.64%
Ore Grade Zn% 0.00% 2.65% 1.46%
Ore Grade PbOx% 0.00% 0.32% 0.18%
Ore Grade ZnOx% 0.00% 0.32% 0.02%
Source: Buenaventura

Figure 10-1:  El Brocal, Fresh Ore Destination and Final Products
Source: SRK

Marcapunta is an underground mine.  In 2017-2020, approximately 93% of its ore production qualified as copper-silver rich ore that was processed in Plant 1;
the balance of approximately 7% fed Plant 2.  Overall, Marcapunta represented only 6% (approximately) of Plant 2’s total throughput.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 68

Table 10-2-:  El Brocal, Mill Feed Composition by Period

Ore
Unit
Parameter Units 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Source
Fresh Ore tonne 2,524,399 2,799,834 2,596,527 1,516,897 9,437,657
Ore Grade Ag oz/tonne 0.66 0.72 0.75 0.74 0.72
Ore Grade Cu % 1.91% 1.66% 1.70% 1.97% 1.79%
Ore Grade As % 0.62% 0.54% 0.56% 0.64% 0.58%
Marcapunta Ore Grade Fe % 15.7% 16.0% 18.4% 17.3% 16.8%
Plant 1 / Total Ore Grade Au g/tonne 0.559 0.528 0.535 0.551 0.542
Plant 1 Ore Grade Pb %          
Ore Grade Zn%          
Ore Grade PbOx %          
Ore Grade Zn Ox%          
Fresh Ore tonne 0 407,386 329,597 0 736,983
Ore Grade Ag oz/tonne 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ore Grade Cu % 0.00% 1.39% 1.57% 0.00% 1.47%
Ore Grade As % 0.00% 0.45% 0.52% 0.00% 0.48%
Ore Grade Fe % 0.0% 16.2% 18.3% 0.0% 17.1%
Marcapunta Ore Grade Au g/tonne 0.000 0.428 0.558 0.000 0.486
Ore Grade Pb %          
Ore Grade Zn%          
Ore Grade PbOx %          
Ore Grade Zn Ox%          
Fresh Ore tonne 3,126,616 3,305,125 3,385,019 2,774,251 12,591,011
Ore Grade Ag oz/tonne 1.30 1.16 1.36 1.23 1.27
Ore Grade Cu %         0.00%
Plant 2 Ore Grade As %         0.00%
Tajo Norte Ore Grade Fe % 17.5% 15.7% 15.8% 17.9% 16.65%
Ore Grade Au g/tonne         0.000
Ore Grade Pb % 1.13% 1.15% 1.25% 1.07% 1.16%
Ore Grade Zn% 2.67% 2.33% 2.43% 3.27% 2.65%
Ore Grade PbOx % 0.42% 0.32% 0.27% 0.28% 0.32%
Ore Grade Zn Ox% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.14% 0.03%
Fresh Ore tonne 3,126,616 3,712,511 3,714,615 2,774,251 13,327,994
Ore Grade Ag oz/tonne 1.30 1.04 1.24 1.23 1.20
Ore Grade Cu % 0.00 0.15% 0.14% 0.00% 0.08%
Ore Grade As % 0.00 0.05% 0.05% 0.00% 0.03%
Ore Grade Fe % 0.17 15.8% 16.1% 17.9% 16.7%
Total Plant 2 Ore Grade Au g/tonne 0.00 0.047 0.049 0.000 0.027
Ore Grade Pb % 0.01 1.03% 1.14% 1.07% 1.09%
Ore Grade Zn% 0.03 2.07% 2.22% 3.27% 2.50%
Ore Grade PbOx % 0.00 0.28% 0.25% 0.28% 0.30%
Ore Grade Zn Ox% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.14% 0.03%
Source: Buenaventura

Marcapunta’s ore mineralogy includes mainly copper sulfides like Enargite with minor content of Chalcocite, Chalcopyrite, Tennantite, Luzonite, and Colusite,
while the gangue composition includes mostly Pyrite, Quartz, Alunite, Kaolinite, and Clays.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 69

Marcapunta mine’s monthly ore supply is shown on Figure 10-2.  Overall, there is a difference of approximately 400,000 tonnes or 4% between ore tonnes
reported by the Marcapunta mine and ore tonnes reported by the processing facilities.

Overall, Marcapunta’s monthly average head grades remained relatively steady with copper grades ranging approximately between 1.6% and 2.3%; silver,
between 0.55 oz/t to 1.15 oz/t; arsenic, between 0.5% and 0.75%; and gold from 0.4 g/t to 0.8 g/t.  The iron’s head grade showed a trend to higher values
starting from approximately 1.6% in 2017 and approaching 2% in 2020.

Figure 10-2:  Marcapunta Ore Production

Source:  Buenaventura

Marcapunta ore allocation to Plant 1 and Plant 2 is shown in Figure 10-3. In 2018 and 2019, a minor fraction (736,893 tonnes) of Marcapunta’s ore was sent for
processing in Plant 2.

Figure 10-3:  Marcapunta Ore Allocation to Plant 1 and Plant 2

Source:  Buenaventura

When considering 365 day per year, Marcapunta 2017’s daily average ore production reached 6,916 tonnes; 8,787 tonnes/day in 2018; 8,017 tonnes/day in
2019; and 4,156 tonnes/day in 2020; the result for 2020 represented a drop of approximately 50% from the previous year’s average.   Ore production in year
2020 was unusually low and there was virtually no production in April and May.   This is considered an anomaly, which was attributable to unexpected external
factors that were associated in large part with the COVID-19 crisis.  The figures from 2018 to 2019 suggest

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 70

that in a normal operating year, Marcapunta should be able to deliver ore in the range of 8,000 to 8,800 t per day.

Tajo Norte’s main credit minerals includes copper, lead, and zinc sulfides as Galena, Sphalerite, and minor quantities of Pb-Ag galena and some Pb and Zn
oxides are also present; the main gangue minerals include Pyrite, Barite, Hematite, and Siderite.

Tajo Norte mine’s monthly ore supply is shown on Figure 10-4.   Overall, the difference between ore tonnes reported by the Tajo Norte mines and those
registered by the processing facilities totaled approximately 1.2 million tonnes or 10%.  

When considering a 365-day year, Tajo Norte 2017’s daily average of ore production reached 8,566 tonnes.  The figure in 2018 was 9,055 tonnes/day and in
2019, 9,274 tonnes/day.   In 2020, the figure stood at 7,606 tonnes/day and reflected a drop of 15% from the previous year’s average.  When compared to
Marcapunta, it appears that the unforeseen external factors that affected he company in 2020 had a significantly lower impact on Tajo Norte’s ore production.

Tajo Norte’s head grades

● Copper grades are typically low below 0.05%; in October and November 2020, they increased to 0.4% but returned to typical values in December
● Lead ranges from 0.59% to 2.65% with an overall weighted average of 1.17%
● Silver appears typically ranging from 0.58 oz/t to 3.19 oz/t, with an overall weighted average of 1.29 oz/t.
● Lead oxide, or PbOx, is steady in the period, ranging from 0.15% to 0.51% with an overall weighted average of 0.26%.
● Zinc head grades appear to be more variable that the other elements in the feed, ranging from 1.91% to 4.35% with an overall weighted average of
2.67%
● Zinc oxide or ZnOx shows a similar profile to that of PbOx, but with slightly lower values.  ZnOx ranges from 0.10% to 0.46% with an overall weighted
average of 0.20%

Figure 10-4:  Tajo Norte Ore Production

Source:  Buenaventura

10.2 Sample Representativeness

Plant 1 is a conventional concentration plant that produces copper concentrate which is trucked offsite to be sold to third parties.  The plant’s unit processes
include crushing, grinding, flotation, final tails thickening and disposal in a conventional tailing’s storage facility as well as thickening and filtration of the final
concentrate stream produced by the flotation plant.  A simplified block flow diagram of Plant 1 is shown in Figure 10-5.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 71

Figure 10-5:  Simplified Block Flow Diagram, Plant 1

Source:  SRK

Plant 1’s operating time is shown in Table 10-3.  If we exclude 2020’s figures, the average operating hours reported translate into 88.8% operating time, which
corresponds to 339 tonnes/hour or 8,143 tonnes using a 24 hour per day basis.

Marcapunta mine’s ore production, which ranged from 8,000 to 8,800 tonnes/d, seems a close match with Plant 1’s processing capacity of 8,143 tonnes/d.  The
88% operating time leaves room for improvement because a properly operated plant of this size should be in the 90% to 95% range and sometimes higher.

Table 10-3:  Operating Time and Throughput

Plant 1
Year Operating hours Operating time ratio Ore Tonnes Tonnes/hour Tonnes/day
(@24h/d)

2017 7,656 87.4% 2,524,399 330 7,914

2018 7,856 89.7% 2,799,834 356 8,554
2019 7,835 89.4% 2,596,527 331 7,954
2020 (*) 2,122 24.2% 1,516,897 715 17,160
Total 2017-2019 23,346 88.8% 7,920,760 339 8,143
Source: Buenaventura

* Partial Data

Production figures from Plant 1 are shown on Table 10-04 and Figure 10-6.   Silver bearing concentrate (Copper Concentrate 1) has been produced on a
regular basis but Copper Concentrate 2 containing no silver was produced only in 2018 and 2019.

Table 10-4:  Plant 1´s Overall Performance

Stream Units 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Fresh Ore tonnes 2,524,399 2,799,834 2,596,527 1,516,897 9,437,657
Ag oz/t 0.66 0.72 0.75 0.74 0.72
Cu% 1.91% 1.66% 1.70% 1.97% 1.79%
As% 0.62% 0.54% 0.56% 0.64% 0.58%
Fe% 15.7% 16.0% 18.4% 17.3% 16.8%
Au g/t 0.56 0.53 0.54 0.55 0.54

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 72

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 73

Stream Units 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total

CuOx % 0.11% 0.09% 0.00% 0.07% 0.07%
Copper Concentrate
1 tonnes 174,795 165,682 160,307 107,743 608,527
Ag oz/t 6.05 7.59 7.17 5.88 6.74
Cu% 25.8% 25.7% 25.1% 25.2% 25.5%
As% 8.5% 8.4% 8.3% 8.3% 8.4%
Fe% 18.1% 17.5% 19.3% 18.8% 18.4%
Au g/t 4.01 3.76 3.36 3.08 3.60
Rec Ag 63.2% 62.4% 58.6% 56.8% 60.6%
Rec Cu 93.5% 91.3% 91.3% 90.9% 91.9%
Rec As 94.4% 92.0% 91.9% 91.8% 92.6%
Rec Fe 8.0% 6.5% 6.5% 7.8% 7.1%
Rec Au 49.7% 42.1% 38.7% 39.7% 42.9%
Mass pull 6.92% 5.92% 6.17% 7.10% 6.45%
Copper Concentrate
2 tonnes 0 19,980 18,341 0 38,320
Ag oz/t 0 0 0 0 0
Cu% 0.0% 24.8% 25.0% 0.0% 24.9%
As% 0.0% 8.1% 8.3% 0.0% 8.2%
Fe% 0.0% 18.2% 18.2% 0.0% 18.2%
Au g/t 0.00 3.13 3.40 0.00 3.26
Rec Ag 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Rec Cu 0.00% 10.64% 10.41% 0.00% 10.52%
Rec As 0.00% 10.61% 10.49% 0.00% 10.55%
Rec Fe 0.00% 0.82% 0.70% 0.00% 0.75%
Rec Au 0.00% 4.22% 4.49% 0.00% 4.35%
Mass pull 0.00% 0.71% 0.71% 0.00% 0.71%
Concentrate Total tonnes 174,795 185,662 178,647 107,743 646,847
Ag oz/t 6.05 6.78 6.43 5.88 6.34
Cu% 25.8% 25.6% 25.1% 25.2% 25.4%
As% 8.5% 8.4% 8.3% 8.3% 8.4%
Fe% 18.1% 17.6% 19.2% 18.8% 18.4%
Au g/t 4.01 3.69 3.36 3.08 3.58
Rec Ag 63.2% 62.4% 58.6% 56.8% 60.6%
Rec Cu 88.6% 96.7% 101.7% 87.7% 94.0%
Rec As 94.4% 102.6% 102.3% 91.8% 98.3%
Rec Fe 8.0% 7.3% 7.2% 7.8% 7.5%
Rec Au 49.7% 46.3% 43.2% 39.7% 45.3%
Mass pull 6.92% 6.63% 6.88% 7.10% 6.85%
Source: Buenaventura
Over the 4-year period, only a minor fraction of the total copper concentrate production (0.41%) was Concentrate 2 (without any declared silver content).

Copper concentrate production reached typical commercial quality grades for copper of around 25% but also contained high arsenic values around 8% or
higher.  This makes it difficult to sell in the open market.  Traders, who are the most likely buyer of a concentrate with these characteristics, will apply significant
discounts because of the presence of deleterious elements.   Arsenic is the only deleterious element that El Brocal has declared.   Precious metals in
Concentrate 1 include silver grading 6.74 oz/t average and gold at 3.6 grams per tonne.

In terms of metallurgical recovery for Concentrate 1 (containing Ag), and consistent with the fact that Enargite is one of the principal minerals, both copper and
arsenic show a recovery to

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 74

concentrate of 90% and above.  Silver deportment was consistently around 60% and gold was also consistent, averaging 42.9% recovery in the period.

Copper Concentrate 1 tonnes production show a downward trend (see Figure 10-6) that is not necessarily consistent with copper head grades.  If we exclude
anomalous data from 2020, the tonnes of Copper Concentrate 1 consistently dropped from the approximately 175,000 tonnes in 2017 to 160,000 in 2019.
 Metallurgical recovery for all metals, as well as mass pull, show a similar trend.  Apparently, Plant 1 is operating on a mass pull basis and its selectivity, or
ability to differentially float minerals of interest, is limited.  Note that pyrite, most likely represented by Fe recovery, remained or increased over the same period.
  Plant 1’s performance suggests a mineral liberation issue that typically originates in substandard operations of the comminution circuit and/or the flotation
circuit (residence time, solids concentration, reagents dosing, flotation air, agitation).

Figure 10-6:  Plant 1’s Overall Performance

Source: Buenaventura

Plant 1’s daily performance in terms of fresh feed and grinding product (P80) is shown on Figure 10-7, and Figure 10-8 showing tonnage as function of P80.   It
is evident that a significant variation in tonnage and P80 occurs on a day-to-day basis.   The tonnage v/s P80 relationship also shows a highly variable operation,
which suggests a lack of suitable operating practices and process controls.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 75

Figure 10-7:  Plant 1 – Daily Performance – Throughput and Grinding P80

Source:  Buenaventura

Beginning around 2019, Plant 1’s throughput and P80 show a downward trend, where tonnage and P80 are consistently lower.  Around July 2019, P80 values
appear to repeat while the tonnage varied significantly; this suggests improper metallurgical accounting and/or errors when sampling, measuring, and recording
operational variables.

Figure 10-8:  Plant 1, Throughput versus Grinding P80

Source:  Buenaventura

10.3 Plant 2, Lead and Zinc Ore

Plant 2 is a conventional concentration plant that produce lead and zinc concentrates through a multistage classification and flotation circuit, see Figure 10-9.
  Ore is initially classified by size using a combination of screen and hydrocyclons to produce a coarse stream, a fines stream, and ultrafines stream.   The
Coarse stream feeds the lead flotation circuit, and its concentrate becomes final lead concentrate; this stream’s tails feed the zinc flotation circuit.  Concentrate
from the zinc circuit becomes final zinc concentrate, and its tails become final tails that are thickened and then disposed of in a conventional tailing’s storage
facility.   The Fines as well as the Ultrafines fraction feed independent flotation circuits to produce zinc concentrate that is blended with similar elements from
the Coarse fraction in a dedicated thickening and filtration circuit.  Tails from each Fines and Ultrafines circuits join the final tails stream at the tailing’s storage
facility.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 76

Figure 10-9:  Simplified Block Flow Diagram, Plant 2

Source: SRK

Plant 2’s operating time is shown in Table 10-5.  When ignoring 2020 figures, the average operating hours reported reached 75.1% equivalent to 535 t/hour.

A concentration plant of comparable size to Plant 2 typically operates around 90% to 95% of the time.  When considering 2017- 2019 average of 535 t per
hour, if Plant 2 works at 90% operating time, then it should be able to process on average 11,500 tonnes/day, and at 95% operating time the throughput could
reach 12,200 tonnes/day.

There are numerous elements that can contribute to low operating times at a concentrator; a non-exhaustive list includes:
● Shortage of ore supply.  In this case, Tajo Norte’s historical data shows it has the capacity to produce ore ranging from 8,500 to 9,000 tonnes per day,
which is equivalent to 9,000t/d / 535t/h / 24h/d =70%.  This suggests that Tajo Norte is not supplying enough ore to maintain Plant 2 at full capacity.  
● The mechanical condition of equipment forces frequent, typically unplanned shutdowns.  The available data is not detailed enough to conclude if this
is a major or minor contributing factor.  Unplanned shutdowns also negatively impact the overall metallurgical performance of the concentrator.
● Lack of proper budget to maintain the mechanical condition of the equipment, which may be attributable to an insufficiently manned maintenance
crew; a scarcity of spare parts; or a combination thereof.  
● Personnel lack the training or skills to service the equipment.
● Substandard operating condition of equipment.

As indicated in the aforementioned list, the potential reasons for low utilization time of the facilities are multiple, and in SRK’s experience, a combination of
these is the usual answer.  El Brocal would need to systematically evaluate these factors to ensure that its facilities are performing at optimum

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 77

capacity.   It is also SRK’s experience that resolving these issues will have a positive impact on ore throughput (higher), maintenance expenditure, and
sometimes on the direct cost of processing, which in aggregate, positively impact the company’s production cost.

Table 10-5:  Plant 2, Operating time and Throughput

Plant 2
Operating Tonnes/day
Year Operating time ratio Ore tonnes Tonnes/hour
hours (@24h/d)

2017 6,455 73.7% 3,126,616 484 11,625

2018 6,564 74.9% 3,712,511 566 13,575
2019 6,711 76.6% 3,714,615 553 13,284
2020 (*) 2,267 25.9% 2,774,251 1,224 29,376
Total 2017-2019 19,730 75.1% 10,553,743 535 12,838
Source: Buenaventura
*  Partial Data

Lead concentrate production increased in 2017-2019 and showed an opposite trend to lead’s head grade and concentrate mass pull, but a positive correlation
with lead recovery, see Table 10-5 and Figure 10-10.   These results suggest that Plant 2 has the potential to consistently reach higher than current values,
likely 60% or above lead recovery and concentrate production in the order of 50,000 tonnes. The presence of zinc in concentrate is high at approximately 7%
and is likely triggering penalty charges in the market.   Silver content averaged 40 oz/t approximately; no gold content is reported.  Mass pull was reasonably
steady with an average of 1.3% over the 2017- 2020 period.

Zinc concentrate production ranged between 90,000 to 100,000 tonnes/year with an unusually steady zinc grade in concentrate that averaged 49.4% over the
2017-2020 period.  Lead content, with an average of 3.6%, is high and likely triggering penalty charges with buyers.  Iron recovery suggests an improvement in
rejecting pyrite from 2017 at 1.02% down to 0.80% in 2019.

No deleterious elements are reported for either the mill feed or in final concentrates generated by Plant 2.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 78

Table 10-6:  Plant 2´s Overall Performance

Stream Units 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total

Fresh ore tonnes 3,126,616 3,712,511 3,714,615 2,774,251 13,327,994
Ag oz/t 1.30 1.04 1.24 1.23 1.20
Pb% 1.13% 1.03% 1.14% 1.07% 1.09%
Zn% 2.7% 2.1% 2.2% 3.3% 2.5%
Fe% 17.5% 15.8% 16.1% 17.9% 16.7%
Concentrate Pb tonnes 41,435 42,584 53,448 36,718 174,185
Ag oz/t 46.21 38.73 37.25 36.98 39.68
Pb% 48.8% 49.4% 47.5% 47.1% 48.2%
Zn% 6.3% 6.5% 7.4% 7.7% 7.0%
Fe% 7.8% 7.3% 7.4% 8.3% 7.7%
Rec Ag 47.2% 42.8% 43.1% 39.8% 43.4%
Rec Pb 57.3% 55.3% 59.8% 58.0% 57.6%
Rec Zn 3.1% 3.6% 4.8% 3.1% 3.6%
Rec Fe 0.6% 0.5% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6%
Mass pull 1.3% 1.1% 1.4% 1.3% 1.3%
Concentrate Zn tonnes 97,527 90,161 91,384 102,056 381,128
Ag oz/t 10.45 10.20 12.91 8.32 10.41
Pb% 3.6% 3.9% 3.9% 2.9% 3.6%
Zn% 49.7% 49.5% 49.3% 49.2% 49.4%
Fe% 5.7% 5.4% 5.2% 6.1% 5.6%
Rec Ag 25.1% 23.9% 25.6% 24.9% 24.9%
Rec Pb 10.1% 9.3% 8.4% 10.0% 9.4%
Rec Zn 58.1% 58.0% 54.7% 55.3% 56.5%
Rec Fe 1.02% 0.84% 0.80% 1.3% 1.0%
Mass pull 3.1% 2.4% 2.5% 3.7% 2.9%
Concentrate Total tonnes 138,961 132,745 144,832 138,774 555,313
Ag oz/t 21.11 19.35 21.89 15.90 19.59
Pb% 17.1% 18.5% 20.0% 14.6% 17.6%
Zn% 36.8% 35.7% 33.8% 38.2% 36.1%
Fe% 6.4% 6.0% 6.0% 6.7% 6.3%
Rec Ag 72.3% 66.7% 68.7% 64.7% 68.3%
Rec Pb 67.4% 64.6% 68.1% 67.9% 67.0%
Rec Zn 61.2% 61.6% 59.5% 58.5% 60.1%
Rec Fe 1.6% 1.4% 1.5% 1.9% 1.6%
Mass pull 4.4% 3.6% 3.9% 5.0% 4.2%
Source: Buenaventura

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 79

Figure 10-10:  Plant 2´s Overall Performance

Source: Buenaventura

The daily performance of the lead-zinc plant (Plant 2) in terms of fresh feed and grinding product (P80) is shown on Figure 10-7.   Figure 10-8 shows tonnage
as a function of P80.   It is evident that a significant variation in tonnage and P80 occurs from day to day.   The tonnage v/s P80 relationship also shows a highly
variable operation, which suggests that operating and process controls are inadequate.  

Around July 2019, Plant 2’s grinding P80 values appear to repeat while the tonnage varied significantly.   This suggests improper metallurgical accounting
and/or errors when sampling, measuring, and recording operational variables.   It is noteworthy that this same pattern was observed from Plant 1 starting
around the same dates.

Figure 10-11:  Plant 2 – Daily Performance – Throughput and Grinding P80

Source: Buenaventura

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 80

Figure 10-12:  Plant 1, Throughput versus Grinding P80

Source: Buenaventura

10.4 Metallurgical Testing

El Brocal provided metallurgical test results to SRK from around 2019.   The testing included a total of 50 samples sourced from multiple locations in
Marcapunta and Tajo Norte.  The vast majority of these samples were subject to batch flotation and the remainder to locked cycle tests.  

An additional 11 composite samples, which represented ore to be mined in the 2022 to 2032 period from Marcapunta and Tajo Norte deposits (according to the
LOM 2021), were subject to flotation testing and mineralogical analysis with third party laboratories based in Lima, Peru.  The location of these samples is
shown in Figure 10-13.

Figure 10-13:  Metallurgical Testing 2021, Sample´s Location

Source: Buenaventura

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 81

Overall, the mineralogical analysis shows that the composition of Marcapunta samples is comparable to that of the previous year’s feed; in other words,
Enargite will continue to be the dominant copper-bearing mineral at roughly 80% while the presence of other copper sulfides will continue to be minor.   Figure
10-14 and Figure 10-15 shows Marcapunta’s samples and the composition of its minerals.  Note the wide range of minerals and their metal composition, which
includes lead, bismuth, vanadium and antimony.  El Brocal reports no bismuth, vanadium, antimony in its final concentrate.

Figure 10-14:  Marcapunta, 2021 Composite’s Mineral Composition

Source: Buenaventura

Figure 10-15: Marcapunta, 2021 Composite´s Overall Mineral Composition

Source: Buenaventura

The 2019 testing campaign included a total of 102 rougher batch flotation tests performed on copper ore.   See Figure 10-16, which depicts the following
results:
● Copper recovery ranged between 80% to 95% in approximately 66 out of 102 tests (or 65%)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 82

● Gold recovery ranged between 15% and 30% in approximately 50% of the tests; the remaining tests yield gold recoveries typically below 5%.  Only
74 tests included gold assays.
● Silver recovery shows a bimodal pattern with one peak roughly matching the one for copper at around 85% recovery; the other peak matches the one
for gold at approximately 25% recovery.
● Overall, metal recovery results roughly approximate those achieved at industrial scale.  Given the nature and purpose of this batch flotation test, it is
expected that El Brocal will continue executing these tests on a regular basis to optimize and support the industrial-scale operation.

Figure 10-16:  Marcapunta, 2021 Composite’s Mineral Composition

Source: Buenaventura

In terms of Tajo Norte, galena and sphalerite continue to be the principal bearers of lead and zinc metal respectively; see Figure 10-17 and Figure 10-18.  
Chalcopyrite and pyrite are pervasive in all samples, and preferentially associated with pyrite and gangue.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 83

Figure 10-17:  Tajo Norte Mineralogical Composition

Source: Buenaventura

Figure 10-18:  Tajo Norte, 2021 Composite’s Overall Mineral Composition

Source: Buenaventura

10.5 Conclusions and Recommendations

Data available to SRK covered the period form 2017 until 2020.   Figures for 2020 show a number of anomalies and erratic behavior, which are attributable to
the negative impacts on the industry from unforeseen external factors.   The figures from 2020 are, in general, excluded or considered unrepresentative of
normal operations for the purposes of this document.

El Brocal’s Marcapunta underground mine’s ore production for the period in question shows monthly values ranging from 2.5 to 2.8 million tonnes per year
averaging approximately 1.88% Cu with a minimum of 1.63% Cu and 2.32% Cu maximum.   Arsenic averaged 0.61%, with a minimum of 0.53% and a
maximum of 0.75%.  Gold averaged 0.54 g/tonne with low of 0.40 g/tonne and high of 0.80 g/tonne.   Copper and iron head grades suggest a slight upward
trend that began in 2018; nevertheless, 2020’s anomalies may be biasing this observation and need to be confirmed with data from future years.  Ninety-three
percent (93%) of Marcapunta’s total production of ore tonnes was classified as copper-silver rich ore and delivered to Plant 1; the balance of approximately 7%
fed Plant 2.  Overall, Marcapunta represented only 6% of Plant 2’s total throughput.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 84

In 2017-2020, Marcapunta’s ore production shows a 4% tonnes difference with the mill feed tonnes as declared by the processing facilities.  While each plant
likely controls all processes based on its own measurements, SRK questions whether the performance parameters (planned and actual tonnage, grades, and
cost) declared by Marcapunta mine are accurate, which impacts mine planning and the steady supply of fresh ore to the mills.

If we exclude 2020’s figures, Plant 1’s operating time averaged 88.8%, which is equivalent to 339 t/hour or 8,143 t based on 24 hours per day.  SRK is of the
opinion that processing facilities like Plant 1 should operate in the 90% to 95% range, or even higher.   SRK also believes it is in El Brocal’s best interest to
identify those bottlenecks in the ore supply end and within Plant 1 itself that are preventing improvements in operating time.  Removing bottlenecks will lower
unit costs; improve overall stability; and allow better control the key operating parameters in the plant.

Copper Concentrate 1 production bearing silver values represent the largest fraction or approximately 99.6% of the approximately 180,000 tonnes/year
produced; the balance or 0.4% was Copper Concentrate 2 without no declared silver content.

Plant 1‘s concentrate grades are reasonably steady; copper averaged 25.5% for Copper Concentrate 1 and 24.9% for Copper Concentrate 2.   Arsenic in
concentrate is high, ranging from 8% to 8.5% for both products.  This more than likely makes it difficult to sell these products in open market and also tends to
trigger high penalty payments.  SRK did not have access to historical information regarding arsenic’s impact on the concentrate valuation; therefore, SRK was
unable to offer a supported opinion about the quality of copper concentrates or the suitability of operating practices, including mine planning, and processing as
well as the shipability and saleability of the production.   In general, the concentrate smelting industry’s approach to deleterious elements contained in
concentrates has been to continuously decrease the grades’ threshold; these triggers penalties; increases penalties; and lowers the grade cap or maximum
acceptable content.   Potentially, if experience with other deleterious metals is replicated, limits may be place on maximum transportable (allowed on ocean
ships) deleterious metal contents.  A way for mining operators to circumvent the deleterious metal’s environmental restrictions, which comes at a high cost, has
been to sell its production to concentrate Traders that claim they blend multiple sources before shipping the blended concentrate to custom smelters around
the globe.

Information available from mineralogical analysis on ore samples obtained in 2021 suggest the presence of bismuth, vanadium and antimony in Marcapunta;
nevertheless, impurity specifications for final copper concentrate only include arsenic.   Precious metals in Concentrate 1 include silver grading 6.74 oz/t
average and gold at 3.6 grams per tonne.

Plant 1’s daily throughput and grinding product size (P80) is highly variable from one day to the next. It is SRK’s experience that Plant 1’s current performance
negatively impacts the metallurgical performance and operating cost, and that El Brocal has an opportunity to materially improve its operating results.
 Additionally, starting in July 2019, both Plant 1 and Plant 2 show similar pattern of repeating the same grinding P80 for several consecutives’ days even though
the corresponding ore throughput varied significantly.  In SRK’s opinion, this is a highly anomalous occurrence, and it is in El Brocal’s best interest to identify
the root cause of this behavior.

El Brocal needs to improve its metallurgical testing protocols to include a standard flotation test (kinetics flotation test, locked cycle tests), whose results can be
easily scaled up and correlated to the current industrial operational results.

A sound operating philosophy that will contribute to the continuous improvement of El Brocal’s business results should consider the metallurgical group using
laboratory testing results to define the operating conditions for each and every ore type or zone to be processed in the industrial scale

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 85

operation.  The operating personnel must comply with and be accountable for following all metallurgical definitions received.  The maintenance group must be
accountable for delivering all equipment and systems to ensure that the floor personnel is able to smoothly operate the plant and deliver the expected results
as defined by the metallurgical group.  El Brocal´s management must be accountable for ensuring each group has the resources and performs as previously
described.  The plant must provide daily feedback of its performance to the geology and mine planning groups, thus closing a cycle that if executed correctly
will continuously improve all performance indicators and business value for El Brocal.

El Brocal may want to integrate key daily data from geology, mining, processing, laboratory, sales in a single and comprehensive operating database.  SRK
recommends that this Operating Database should not be editable once data has been entered and all reports, analysis, summaries, etc must be sourced from
the single Operating Database.  Data should be readily available/accessible to all key personnel.

The reconciliation analysis between mine and mill could not be verified.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 86

11 Mineral Resources Estimates

11.1 Key Assumptions, Parameters, and Methods used

The Mineral Resources estimation was conducted jointly by SRK and Buenaventura.  The closure date of the database was on October 31, 2021, and the
effective date to report the Mineral Resources was on December 3, 2021.  

El Brocal Mine has open pit and underground operations of 3 zones which are:  Tajo Norte, Tajo Sur and Marcapunta, generating only one resource model for
all the deposit.  

This section describes the Mineral Resources estimation method and summarizes the key assumptions that were considered for each deposit by El Brocal.

Software such as Vulcan ©, Supervisor® and Leapfrog Geo® were used to develop the geological model, the geostatistic analysis, the block model
construction, the ore grade interpolation of copper, zinc, lead, silver, gold and iron, apart from the model validation and the resource reporting.  

In general, to conduct the resource estimation process, a series of steps were made by BVN and SRK, according to the following order:
● Database compilation and verification
● Revision of the interpretation and construction of the geological models or wireframes,
● Definition of domains,
● Compositing and capping for the geostatistical analysis and interpolation
● Analysis and modelling of variograms
● Grade interpolation of Cu, Pb, Zn, Au, Ag and Fe
● Assignment of density values
● Validation of grade estimates against original data
● Resource classification
● Conciliation of mineral
● RPEE
The following sections describe all the procedures used and the assumptions that were considered for estimating the Mineral Resources.

11.2 Database
The database used for the update of the Mineral Resources and El Brocal geological model is composed of 3,685 diamond drillings (453,464.5 meters) and 3
air reverse circulation drillholes (RC) (668 m) and includes information of collar, survey, assay, lithology, density, mineralization, alteration and mine zone.  All
the information was provided by Buenaventura in digital format in csv and represents all the data up to October 31, 2021.  The statistics of the original samples
used in the resource estimation is summarized in Table 11-1.  
Table 11-1:  Statistics of the El Brocal Original Data

Deposit Element Samples Mean Minimum Máximum CV Std. Dev

El Brocal Cu % 200,087 0.569 0.000025 37.10 2.61 1.484
Zn % 191,089 0.639 0.000010 40.10 2.91 1.860
PB % 190,657 0.286 0.000025 55.20 3.55 1.014

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 87

Deposit Element Samples Mean Minimum Máximum CV Std. Dev

Ag oz/t 217,021 0.661 0.000161 809.09 5.52 3.644
Au ppm 168,399 0.347 0.002500 58.80 2.11 0.733
Fe% 200,414 12.775 0.005000 55.20 0.82 10.433
As % 163,769 0.206 0.000005 14.04 2.63 0.542
Source: Buenaventura, 2021

11.3 Geological Model and Estimation Domains

The geological models developed in El Brocal were constructed in order to have a better knowledge of the deposit geology, understand all the aspects that
control the mineralization and provide support to the Mineral Resources model.  

The geological modelling in 3D includes a lithology model to characterize the geological bodies, a mineral zone to characterize the oxidized material, a
structural model and a mineralization model through the construction of the envelops of isogrades to identify and segregate domains through cut-off grades.

The models were developed in Leapfrog Geo (v 2021.1) and incorporated different geological information that was based on:  
● Geological logging (alteration, lithology and mineralization)
● Geological mapping
● Cross sections interpreted
● Structural surface observations / diamond drill cores
● Polylines interpreted (3D Surface and sub-surface)

11.3.1 Lithological and Structural Model

The lithological model was developed by Buenaventura with Leapfrog Geo in 2020 based on a new geological mapping at 1:1000 scale that included alteration,
mineralization, lithological and structural maps.  Also, historical data (since 1993) was also compiled and used for providing greater support to the model;
together with a mapping inside the mine, interpretation of cross and digitalized sections, and all the diamond drillholes information.  In addition, an updated
stratigraphic column was conducted in El Brocal based on the results of these works.  

Buenaventura has defined 10 lithological units: Mitu, Conglomerado Shuco, Conglomerado Transicional, Calera Inferior (Cal_Inf), Calera Medio Favorable
(Cal_Mid_Fav), Calera Medio Varvada (Cal_Mid_Var), Calera Superior (Cal_Sup), Deposito Piroclástico (Dep_piro), Dacita Porfirítica (Dac_Porf) and Brecha
(Bx).  The 3D view of the lithological model is shown in Figure 11-1.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 88

Figure 11-1:  3D View of El Brocal Lithological Model

Source: Buenaventura, 2021

The structural model was developed by SRK in 2019 and by Buenaventura in 2020.  In 2019, SRK was commissioned by Buenaventura to conduct a structural
study and modelling in the north part of the deposit (North Pit).  

In 2020, Buenaventura continued with the studies to complement and integrate the structural model of the whole deposit of the mid and southern area (Smelter
and Marcapunta) and the information update of the northern area, conducting structural study works that includes structural mapping in surface at 1:1000
scale, collection of all the historical information from diamond drillholes, and mapping in underground mine, and also interpretation support of cross and
digitalized sections.  All the work was completed in the first quarter of 2021 with the construction of the structural model and the integration of a global structural
model.  SRK revised the study and structural model during all the construction process.  

SRK it is of the opinion that the northern area of El Brocal has a detailed study and information in sufficient quantity, confidence and support for considering the
model at feasibility level.   However, the southern area needs greater detail and information support to define the confidence in the fault modeling and the
control that these faults have in the mineralization.  Therefore, regarding the southern area, SRK considers that the model is at conceptual level.  According to
a communication with Buenaventura, new structural works will be conducted in the first quarter of 2022 to provide robustness and confidence to the structural
model in the southern area.  

The modelling of the major faults that control the stratigraphy and mineralization in El Brocal is shown in Figure 11-2.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 89

Figure 11-2:  3D View of El Brocal Modeled Structures

Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

11.3.2 Grade Shells and Domaining

SRK constructed grade envelops at different cut-off grades inside each lithological unit in Leapfrog Geo using the tool New Indicator RBF Interpolant in order to
define the estimation domains.  The cut-off grades were defined statistically to separate zones in terms of spatial variability and reflects the differences in the
continuity of the grades in each unit.    

The grade envelops (grade shells) were constructed for each copper, lead, zinc, silver, gold and iron element, taking into account the following: a sample
compositing at 2 m along the drillhole within the lithological unit, structural trends, probability factors (iso-value) between 40% and 45% to ensure continuity, a
variation coefficient lower than 2.5 and evaluation of the relative dilution above and below the cut-off grades in each envelop.  

SRK and Buenaventura considered that an additional zoning was necessary to control the high grades within the upper domain defined and prevent
overestimation in the grade interpolation, delimiting intermediate and low-grade zones.  Zones below the intermediate cut-off grades were used in all the units
as low-grade domains.  

SRK used the following cut-off grades to define the following intermediate and high-grade domains as follows:
● Cut-off grades Cu>0.5 % for intermediate-grade zones and Cu >1.8 % for high grade.  
● Cut-off grades Zn>0.1 % for intermediate-grade zones and Zn >1.5 % for high grade.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 90

● Cut-off grades Pb>0.05 % for intermediate-grade zones and Pb >1.  % for high grade.  
● Cut-off grades Ag>0.32 oz/t for intermediate-grade zones and Ag >1 oz/t for high grade.  
● Cut-off grades Au > 0.1 % for intermediate-grade zones and Au > 0.8 ppm for high grade
● Cut-off grades Fe > 8 % to define high-grade zones.  
Finally, the estimation domains were defined using the grade shells within each of the ten lithological units for each element.  Contact analysis was conducted
to validate the consistency in the domain division and a “hard contact” was used during the interpolation to prevent influence of samples among domains.  
Table 11-2 shows the domains and codes used in the estimation for Cu, Pb, Ag, Zn, Fe and Au; and summaries the volume thar each lithology represents.  
Table 11-2:  El Brocal domains used in the estimation.  

Lithological Unit Domain Code Volume (m³) % Volume

1: Brecha High grade, Medium grade, Low grade 11, 12, 13
12 14,429,000 0.2
13
2: Calera_Inferior High grade, Medium grade, Low grade
21, 22, 23 426,400,000 5.5

3: Calera Media Favorable High grade, Medium grade, Low grade

31. 32. 33 464,640,000 5.9

4: Calera Media Varvada High grade, Medium grade, Low grade

41, 42, 43 191,100,000 2.4

5: Calera Superior High grade, Medium grade, Low grade

51, 52, 53 583,560,000 7.5

6: Conglomerado Shuco High grade, Medium grade, Low grade

61, 62, 63 751,110,000 9.6

7: Conglomerado Transicional High grade, Medium grade, Low grade

71, 72, 73 476,790,000 6.1

8: Dacita Porfiritica High grade, Medium grade, Low grade

81, 82, 83 28,263,000 0.4

9: Deposito Piroclastico High grade, Medium grade, Low grade

91, 92, 93 1,571,600,000 20.1

10: Mitu High grade, Medium grade, Low grade

101, 102, 103 3,304,500,000 42.3

Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

A 3D view of the grade shells for zinc within the lithological unit (Cal_Mid_Fav) “Calera Media Favorable” is shown in Figure 11-3, and a structural section of
the same domain is shown in Figure 11-4.  

Tables as Table 11-3 were prepared in the construction of grade shells to ensure an acceptable model through the statistics and relative dilution

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 91

Figure 11-3:  3D View of medium-grade envelop (yellow) and High-grade (red) within the “Calera Medio Favorable” Unit (Cal_Mid_Fav).
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

Figure 11-4:  Cross Section of the Zinc Grade Envelop in domain cal_mid_fav
(high grade: red, and medium grade: yellow)
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

Table 11-3:  Statistics of Zinc Grade Shell Model Indicators

Indicator statistics: Zinc – (Calera Media Favorable: Cal_Mid_Fav)
Total number of samples 38,259 Total number of samples 19,007
Cut-off value (%) 0.1 Cut-off value (%) 1.5
≥ cut-off ≥ cut-off

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 92

Indicator statistics: Zinc – (Calera Media Favorable: Cal_Mid_Fav)

Number of points 19,070 Number of points 9,353
Percentage 49.84% Percentage 49.21%
Mean value (%) 2.1314 Mean value (%) 3.65029
Minimum value (%) 0.1 Minimum value (%) 1.5
Maximum value (%) 26.4131 Maximum value (%) 25.835
Standard deviation 2.42426 Standard deviation 2.68422
Coefficient of variance 1.1374 Coefficient of variance 0.735343
Variance 5.87704 Variance 7.20503
Output volume statistics Output volume statistics
Resolution 10 Resolution 5
Iso-value 0.45 Iso-value 0.4
Inside Inside
≥ cut-off ≥ cut-off
Number of samples 18,429 Number of samples 8,998
Percentage 48.17% Percentage 47.34%
< cut-off < cut-off
Number of samples 1,335 Number of samples 1,075
Percentage 3.49% Percentage 5.66%
6.80% 10.70%
All points All points
Mean value (%) 2.0464 Mean value (%) 3.39957
Minimum value (%) 0.0001 Minimum value (%) 0.0001
Maximum value (%) 26.4131 Maximum value (%) 2.58E+01
Standard deviation 2.41863 Standard deviation 2.71638
Coefficient of variance 1.18189 Coefficient of variance 0.799038
Variance 5.84978 Variance 7.37875
Volume (m³) 85,404,211 Volume (m³) 40,828,777
Number of parts 20 Number of parts 14
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

11.4 Exploratory Data Analysis

The exploratory data analysis (EDA) was conducted by Buenaventura in the composites identified for each domain.  The statistical and graphic analysis was
performed (including histograms, probability diagrams, scatter plots) for each domain in order to evaluate an adequate stationarity.

11.4.1 Compositing and Capping

Buenaventura reviewed cumulative probability plots of the original sample data without compositing to evaluate the grade population with presence of outliers
values inside each estimation domain.  Grade capping was necessary in order to control the over-estimation effects at local level on the interpolation process.
 Capping is carried out to the original samples before the compositing process.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 93

The analysis was based in the visual interpretation of the probability plot structure by observing the appropriate inflection points at the end of the populations
and that this does not generate a significant percentage of metallic content loss.  

The capping values that were assigned to each domain according to the evaluation is summarized in Table 11-4.

An example of the cumulative probability plots and top-cut analysis for Pb element within the most important domains of the deposit are shown in Figure 11-5
and Table 11-5 summarizes a comparison between statistics before and after capping (silver, iron and gold see in appendix)
Table 11-4:  Cu, Pb and Zn Capping Values Applied in El Brocal.  
Mine Domain Cu (%) Pb (%) Zn (%)
EL BROCAL 11 3.5 0.5 0.32
12 12.5 3.2 NC
13 11.65 NC NC
21 4 3 5
22 11 4 5
23 13.5 NC 7
31 4.5 0.4 3.5
32 12 4.5 12
33 22 30 25
41 3 0.35 4
42 10 5 4.5
43 NC 5.5 16
51 5 2 8.5
52 NC 3.2 7
53 NC 9.4 20
61 5.3 0.25 2.5
62 13 1.2 7
63 30 NC 15
71 5 0.25 4.5
72 16 1.1 7.5
73 18 NC 10
81 7 0.7 4
82 16 2 1.5
83 17 NC NC
91 5 0.38 0.5
92 NC NC NC
93 NC NC NC
101 9 0.4 2
102 12 1.75 1.85
103 10 NC NC
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)
Note: NC = Not capped

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 94

Figure 11-5:  Top-Cut analysis of Pb in domain 32.

Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

Table 11-5:  Statical comparison before and after capping of Pb in domain 32 (Capping: 4.5%)

Statistics Statical comparison before and after capping of Pb in domain 32

(Capping: Raw Data Top Cut Difference (%)

4.5 %)Statistics

Mean 0.37 0.38 3.4

Maximum 28 5 83.7

SD 0.68 0.5 26.4

CV 1.83 1.4 23.8

Samples 40,080 39,924 0.4

Num_cut - 156 -

Metal_cut - 3.40% 96.6

Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 95

After the capping process, the length-weighted compositing was obtained to ensure the ore grade standardization of the samples along the drillhole within each
domain modeled.  To determine the composite, Buenaventura evaluated different scenarios of the composites size in each lithology and obtained the most
appropriate composite value for the deposit.   The sample compositing size determined by Buenaventura was 2 m with 1-m tolerance.   Table 11-6 SRK
evaluated the compositing by comparing the Cu statistics (%) without weighting, directly composited versus the Au statistics with length-weighted compositing.
 SRK verified that there is no significant bias in the mean after the compositing. Table 11-7 shows the statistics of the composited data samples considered in
Cu estimation domains.  The statistics of the other elements and domains are provided in the Appendix.    
Table 11-6:  Statistical comparison between uncomposited data and composited data for copper (%) in domain 3.
Domain code Statistics Uncomposited Composited Difference %
31 Samples 49,749 34,009 31.
Minimum 0.0001 0.0001 0.0
Maximum 4.500 4.500 0.0
Mean 0.032 0.027 14.8
Variance 0.025 0.013 45.5
Std. Dev. 0.157 0.116 26.2
CV 4.941 4.278 13.4
32 Samples 9,780 6,781 30.7
Minimum 0.001 0.001 0.0
Maximum 12.000 12.000 0.0
Mean 0.946 0.911 3.8
Variance 1.483 0.854 42.4
Std. Dev. 1.218 0.924 24.1
CV 1.287 1.015 21.2
33 Samples 2,929 2,117 27.7
Minimum 0.001 0.001 0.0
Maximum 22.000 22.000 0.0
Mean 3.925 3.856 1.8
Variance 11.848 7.182 39.4
Std. Dev. 3.442 2.680 22.1
CV 0.877 0.695 20.8
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

Table 11-7:  Summary of statistics composited data in main domains for copper, zinc and lead.

Metal Domain Samples Mean Minimum Maximum Variance Std. Dev CV

Cu (%) 61 15,598 0.120 0.0001 5.300 0.040 0.201 1.676
62 19,895 0.873 0.001 13.000 0.746 0.864 0.989
63 3,328 4.323 0.001 29.030 13.229 3.637 0.841
71 9,753 0.092 0.0001 5.000 0.037 0.191 2.082
72 8,661 1.003 0.001 15.131 1.332 1.154 1.150
73 412 4.335 0.001 18.000 10.464 3.235 0.746
Pb (%) 31 Pb 15,689 0.0001 0.400 0.011 0.001 0.023
32 Pb 23,617 0.001 4.500 0.297 0.153 0.391

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 96

Metal Domain Samples Mean Minimum Maximum Variance Std. Dev CV

33 Pb 3,597 0.001 24.790 2.514 5.427 2.330
61 Pb 14,190 0.0001 0.250 0.019 0.000 0.018
62 Pb 24,273 0.001 1.763 0.145 0.018 0.135
Zn (%) 31 Zn 21,934 0.001 3.500 0.040 0.038 0.194
32 Zn 10,257 0.001 8.831 0.606 0.449 0.670
33 Zn 10,746 0.001 23.975 3.259 7.713 2.777
61 Zn 36,837 0.0001 2.455 0.015 0.004 0.061
62 Zn 1,345 0.001 6.586 0.475 0.516 0.719
63 Zn 150 0.001 15.000 3.979 13.288 3.645
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

11.4.2 Continuity Analysis: Variogram

SRK conducted the continuity analysis and spatial correlation of the grade values between simple sample pairs within each domain to determine the greatest
spatial continuity axis.   Variograms were built by using spherical type structures.   There is not enough data in some domains to conduct an appropriate
variogram modelling.  In that case, domains were clustered into the same lithological unit to complete the analysis.    

Some of the variograms modelled in the most important Cu, Pb, and Zn domains are shown in Figure 11-6, Figure 11-7 and Figure 11-8, respectively (for all
domains and elements see the appendix).

Figure 11-6:  Cu Modeled Variogram within Domain 62/63.

Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 97

Figure 11-7:  Zn Modeled Variogram within Domain 32/33.  

Source: SRK, 2021

Figure 11-8:  Pb Modeled Variogram within Domain 52/53.  

Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

Variograms (spherical type) in main mineralized mantles and by copper, zinc and lead are summarized in Table 11-8.   This table shows the variograms
parameters and direction were used

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 98

in the grade estimation of each block conducted by SRK. The rest of the variogram parameters for each element and domain are found in appendixes.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 99

Table 11-8:  Summary of Cu, Pb and Zn Variogram Model Parameters

Semi Plunge 2
Structure Bearing Plunge Dip Major Minor Sill Bearing Dip Major Semi Minor
Metal Domain Nugget Sill 1 major
count 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 major 2 2
1
Cu 63 0.212 2 0.48 358.49 29.50 5.73 4 3 3 0.31 358.49 29.499 5.725 26 49 23
71 0.212 2 0.53 0 0 -30 7 7 23 0.26 0 0 -30 52 111 61
72 0.212 2 0.53 0 0 -30 7 7 23 0.26 0 0 -30 52 111 61
73 0.212 2 0.53 0 0 -30 7 7 23 0.26 0 0 -30 52 111 61
Pb 31 0.164 2 0.54 130.15 1.73 -9.85 47 29 12 0.29 130.15 1.73 -9.85 400 580 120
32 0.164 2 0.54 130.15 1.73 -9.85 47 29 12 0.29 130.15 1.73 -9.85 400 580 120
33 0.164 2 0.54 130.15 1.73 -9.85 47 29 12 0.29 130.15 1.73 -9.85 400 580 120
61 0.135 2 0.65 31.52 9.85 -17.5 10 15 27 0.22 31.52 9.85 -17.50 300 350 120
62 0.135 2 0.65 31.52 9.85 -17.5 10 15 27 0.22 31.52 9.85 -17.50 300 350 120
Zn 31 0.13 2 0.53 250 10 0 19 27 7 0.34 250 10 0 90 154 33
32 0.13 2 0.53 250 10 0 19 27 7 0.34 250 10 0 90 154 33
33 0.13 2 0.53 250 10 0 19 27 7 0.34 250 10 0 90 154 33
61 0.155 2 0.62 220 0 0 21 15 7 0.22 220 0 0 116 134 73
62 0.155 2 0.62 220 0 0 21 15 7 0.22 220 0 0 116 134 73
63 0.155 2 0.62 220 0 0 21 15 7 0.22 220 0 0 116 134 73
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 100

11.5 Mineral Resources Estimates

The Mineral Resources estimation was completed using Vulcan.   It considered all the composited and capped samples, the estimation domains and the
continuity analysis previously conducted.  

11.5.1 Block Model

Buenaventura constructed a block model for grade interpolation using Vulcan software.  The block model covers the lithological model and include all the pit
zone and the current underground workings.  The model does not have rotation and therefore the X, Y and Z axis follow the East–West, North-South and
elevation directions; and is blocked with 8x8x6 parent cell.  The characteristics of El Brocal block model are summarized in Table 11-9.
Table 11-9:  Brocal Block Model detail.

Block Size No of
Model Direction Minimum Maximum (m)
blocks

El Brocal East 360,196.0 362,308.0 8 264

North 8,807,196.0 8,812,612.0 8 677
Elevation 3,646.0 4,516.0 6 145
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

11.5.2 Grade Interpolation and parameters

The estimation parameters were defined based on neighbor analysis (QKNA) in Supervisor.   In some domains, the estimation included a grade spherical
restriction to the sample influence (outlier restriction).  Generally, the sphere influence may include one or more blocks located near the sample with restricted
grade.  Outside this influence volume, the sample grade is delimited.  

The methodology and the resource estimation process consisted in:

● All the domains were estimated with Ordinary Kriging and the Nearest Neighbor (NN) method in order to validate the model.  
● An estimation plan with 4 passes in the search radius and 3x3x3 discretization
● The hard contacts were applied among the domains.  In that way, every mineralized solid was estimated with the composites that are located inside
the domain solid under evaluation.
● In all the zones, the angles are controlled by dynamic anisotropy.   The Dynamic anisotropy used during Kriging is useful for aligning both the
variographic model and the search ellipsoid.
● The minimum number of drillholes to estimate each block was 1
The Cu estimation parameters of the principal domains are summarized in Table 11-10.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 101

Table 11-10:  Cu, Pb and Zn Estimation Parameters

Metal Domain Pass Search distances (m) Rotation angles (°) Sample counts Sample Limits
Semi Min Max
Minor Max samples per
Major axis major
Rot 1 Rot 2 Rot 3 samples
per samples
per
Axis
drillhole

axis
est
est

Cu 61 1 30 30 12.5 358.49 29.50 5.73 3 10 2

2 60 60 25 358.49 29.50 5.73 3 10 2
3 120 120 50 358.49 29.50 5.73 3 10 2
4 240 240 100 358.49 29.50 5.73 1 8 -
62 1 30 30 12.5 358.49 29.50 5.73 3 10 2
2 60 60 25 358.49 29.50 5.73 3 10 2
3 120 120 50 358.49 29.50 5.73 3 10 2
4 240 240 100 358.49 29.50 5.73 1 8 -
63 1 30 30 12.5 358.49 29.50 5.73 3 10 2
2 60 60 25 358.49 29.50 5.73 3 10 2
3 120 120 50 358.49 29.50 5.73 3 10 2
4 240 240 100 358.49 29.50 5.73 1 8 -
71 1 30 30 10 0 0 -30 3 10 2
2 55 60 20 0 0 -30 3 10 2
3 110 120 40 0 0 -30 3 10 2
4 220 240 80 0 0 -30 1 8 -
72 1 30 30 10 0 0 -30 3 10 2
2 55 60 20 0 0 -30 3 10 2
3 110 120 40 0 0 -30 3 10 2
4 220 240 80 0 0 -30 1 8 -
73 1 30 30 10 0 0 -30 3 8 2
2 55 60 20 0 0 -30 3 8 2
3 110 120 40 0 0 -30 3 5 2
4 220 240 80 0 0 -30 1 6 -
Pb 31 1 45 35 10 130.15 1.73 -9.85 3 8 2
2 90 70 20 130.15 1.73 -9.85 3 10 2
3 135 105 30 130.15 1.73 -9.85 3 12 2
4 180 145 40 130.15 1.73 -9.85 1 14 2
32 1 45 35 10 130.15 1.73 -9.85 3 14 2
2 90 70 20 130.15 1.73 -9.85 3 14 2
3 135 105 30 130.15 1.73 -9.85 3 12 2
4 180 145 40 130.15 1.73 -9.85 1 14 2
33 1 45 35 10 130.15 1.73 -9.85 3 14 2
2 90 70 20 130.15 1.73 -9.85 3 14 2
3 135 105 30 130.15 1.73 -9.85 3 14 2
4 180 145 40 130.15 1.73 -9.85 1 14 2

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 102

61 1 50 50 10 31.52 9.85 -17.50 3 12 2

2 100 100 30 31.52 9.85 -17.50 3 12 2
3 150 150 45 31.52 9.85 -17.50 3 12 2
4 200 200 60 31.52 9.85 -17.50 1 12 2
62 1 50 50 10 31.52 9.85 -17.50 3 8 2
2 100 100 30 31.52 9.85 -17.50 3 10 2
3 150 150 45 31.52 9.85 -17.50 3 10 2
4 200 200 60 31.52 9.85 -17.50 1 12 2
Zn 1 30 53 10 250 10 0 3 10 2
2 60 106 20 250 10 0 3 10 2
3 90 159 30 250 10 0 3 10 2
4 120 212 40 250 10 0 1 10 -
1 30 53 10 250 10 0 3 10 2
2 60 106 20 250 10 0 3 10 2
3 90 159 30 250 10 0 3 10 2
4 120 212 40 250 10 0 1 10 -
1 30 53 10 250 10 0 3 10 2
2 60 106 20 250 10 0 3 10 2
3 90 159 30 250 10 0 3 10 2
4 120 212 40 250 10 0 1 10 -
1 54 52 14 220 0 0 3 12 2
2 108 104 28 220 0 0 3 12 2
3 162 156 42 220 0 0 3 12 2
4 216 208 56 220 0 0 1 12 -
1 54 52 14 220 0 0 3 12 2
2 108 104 28 220 0 0 3 12 2
3 162 156 42 220 0 0 3 12 2
4 216 208 56 220 0 0 1 12 -
1 54 52 14 220 0 0 3 12 2
2 108 104 28 220 0 0 3 12 2
3 162 156 42 220 0 0 3 12 2
4 216 208 56 220 0 0 1 12 -
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 103

11.5.3 Model Validation

SRK verified the block model estimations through of different techniques included cross validation, visual inspection of the composites and the block grades,
statistical comparison among composites and block model distributions, and also statistical comparison among estimations obtained with the nearest
neighbor method, through swath plots.  

Cross Validation
When defining the modeled variograms, the estimation and the search neighborhoods, there is a potential value range that can be established.  In order to
optimize these values, a cross validation was conducted.   This technique implies excluding a sample point and estimating a rating instead by using the
remaining compounds.  This process is repeated for all the compounds that are used for the estimation, and the average grade estimated is compared versus
the actual average ore grade of the compounds.

To establish the parameters that provide the most accurate result, a variety of estimation techniques, search neighborhood and variogram models were tested
by using this method in El Brocal.  

The cross-validation results confirmed that OK is a reasonable estimation method when there are enough data for variogram analysis (Figure 11-9).  The
cross validation also helped in the variogram adjustment and the neighborhood search parameters.  

Figure 11-9:  Cross Validation for Domain 42, 43 for Zinc.  

Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

Visual Validation
SRK revised visually the block model through cross sections to ensure that the grade distribution in the blocks is consistent with the average composite grade.
 

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 104

The Cu grade distribution (%) in the drillholes and in the block model is shown in Figure 11-10.   The consistency between the estimated grades and the
composite grades can be observed in this figure.

Figure 11-10: Visual Validation of the Cu (%) Grade Model Versus the Grade in the Drillholes
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

The Pb distribution grades (%) in the drillholes and in the block model are shown in Figure 11-11.  The consistency between the estimated grades and the
composite grades can be observed in this figure.

Figure 11-11: Visual Validation of the Pb (%) Grade Model Versus the Grade in the Drillholes
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

The Zn grade distribution (%) in the drillholes and in the block model are shown in Figure 11-12.   The consistency between the estimated grade and the
composite grades can be observed in this figure.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 105

Figure 11-12:  Visual Validation of the Zn (%) Grade Model Versus the Grade in the Drillholes
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

Global Estimation Validation

SRK used the Ordinary Kriging (OK) and the Nearest Neighbors (NN) models to validate the interpolation model and to verify the global grade bias of the
blocks.  The OK and NN grades were compared versus all the blocks estimated at a cut-off grade of zero.  The result of this comparison is shown in Table 11-
11, Table 11-12 and Table 11-13.  
Table 11-11:  Verification of the Global Bias in Cu Domains of El Brocal Mine
Domain CU_OK CU_NN Difference
11 0.12 0.11 14.4%
12 0.91 0.90 0.6%
13 3.30 3.20 3.0%
21 0.01 0.01 12.8%
22 1.00 1.05 -4.9%
23 3.79 3.66 3.5%
31 0.02 0.02 -2.3%
32 0.89 0.89 0.6%
33 3.86 3.82 1.1%
41 0.00 0.00 2.4%
42 1.10 0.99 9.8%
43 4.29 3.68 14.2%
51 0.00 0.00 5.1%
61 0.05 0.05 3.5%
62 0.82 0.80 2.2%
63 4.21 4.19 0.5%
71 0.02 0.02 4.3%
72 0.93 0.93 0.5%
73 4.71 4.81 -2.1%
81 0.02 0.02 2.1%
82 0.89 0.86 3.6%
83 3.86 3.99 -3.4%
91 0.009 0.010 -12.2%
92 0.62 0.76 -18.82
101 0.09 0.09 2.0%
102 0.91 0.90 0.6%
103 3.18 3.18 0.0%
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 106

Table 11-12:  Verification of the Global Bias in El Brocal Pb Domains

Domain PB_OK PB_NN Difference
11 0.077 0.079 -3.6%
21 0.01 0.01 -1.8%
22 0.20 0.20 -2.0%
31 0.01 0.01 3.9%
32 0.32 0.30 3.4%
33 2.52 2.42 3.9%
41 0.01 0.01 -9.0%
42 0.31 0.31 0.9%
43 1.70 1.71 -0.6%
51 0.01 0.01 -0.19
52 0.42 0.39 5.3%
53 1.58 1.50 4.6%
61 0.02 0.02 -2.3%
62 0.14 0.14 3.1%
71 0.01 0.01 9.8%
72 0.15 0.16 -2.4%
81 0.01 0.01 2.8%
82 0.08 0.08 4.5%
91 0.01 0.01 -2.6%
101 0.01 0.01 3.4%
102 0.10 0.10 -2.5%
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

Table 11-13:  Verification of the Global Bias in El Brocal Zn Domains

Dominio ZN_OK ZN_NN Difference
11 0.00 0.00 2.0%
21 0.05 0.05 0.3%
22 0.63 0.60 4.8%
23 2.06 2.05 0.6%
31 0.09 0.09 5.0%
32 0.61 0.60 0.6%
33 3.19 3.13 2.0%
41 0.06 0.06 3.0%
42 0.61 0.61 0.4%
43 2.65 2.68 -1.0%
51 0.02 0.02 -21.22
52 0.73 0.72 0.5%
53 2.58 2.47 4.5%
61 0.02 0.03 -12.2%
62 0.58 0.58 0.0%
63 3.09 3.09 -0.3%
71 0.020 0.016 17.9%
72 0.71 0.64 8.6%
73 1.56 1.44 7.8%
81 0.01 0.01 0.0%
82 0.39 0.37 5.5%
91 0.01 0.01 -2.8%
101 0.02 0.02 2.9%
102 0.33 0.26 20.1%
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

Validation of the Local Estimation

SRK verified local biased by creating a series of swaths through El Brocal grade models by columns (with east direction), rows (with North direction) and levels
(elevations), and by comparing the grade means of the composited and capped data, the interpolation grades by OK and NN.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 107

In general, SRK considers that the Cu, Pb and Zn estimation model presents an appropriate consistency in the three axes that were compared.   The swath
plots revised in El Brocal are shown in Figure 11-13, Figure 11-14 and Figure 11-15.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 108

Figure 11-13:  Swath Plots Comparing Estimation of Cu OK Versus Cu NN in the Three Dimensions, in the Domain 62.
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 109

Figure 11-14:  Swath Plots Comparing Estimation of Pb OK Versus Pb NN in the Three Directions, in the Domain 32.
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 110

Figure 11-15:  Swath Plots Comparing Estimation of Zn OK Versus Zn NN in the Three Directions, in Domain 52.
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 111

In most domains, the grade by Ordinary Kriging of most of the domains are located within 5 % of the bias with regard to the NN grade for all the elements
analyzed.  The percentage differences between the interpolation and the nearest neighbor methods are within the reasonable tolerances,

According to a visual examination and a comparison between the interpolation and nearest neighbor models, El Brocal resource model does not have global or
local bias in most domains and represents a reasonable estimation of the in-situ resources without dilution.

11.5.4 Bulk Density

Bulk density is obtained and measured from the diamond drillholes.  A total of 13,317 density samples were taken in the deposit, which was divided into 3
zones according to their characteristics.  The northern zone corresponds to “Tajo Norte” (TN) (open pit), the intermediate zone corresponds to "Tajo Sur” (TS)
and the southern zone to Marcapunta Sur (MO).  

Density measurements were conducted in the internal laboratory of El Brocal.  Check samples were sent to an external and independent laboratory (Certimin
in Lima) to control the mine density measurement quality.  The bulk density is measured by paraffin wax method and the values are assigned in the block
model considering the median obtained within each lithological unit; prior statistical evaluation where the density population medians are analyzed and all the
values above 2 times the standard deviation are deleted to have a consistent database.  

The density statistics is summarized in the table below (Table 11-14)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 112

Table 11-14:  El Brocal density measurement after statistical evaluation.  

Descriptive Data Statistics

Standard
Deposit Zone Lithology # Data Minimum Maximum Range Mean Median Variance CV Std Dv.
Deviation
MO Mineral Brecha 442 2.28 4.20 1.92 3.22 3.21 0.433 0.187 0.134 0.0206
Mineral Calera Inferior 5 1.89 3.81 1.92 2.72 2.74 0.722 0.521 0.265 0.323
Mineral Calera Superior 1 2.21 2.21 0 2.21 2.21 - - - -
Mineral Conglomerado Shuco 261 2.11 3.92 1.81 3.02 3.01 0.415 0.173 0.137 0.0257
Mineral Conglomerado Transicional 58 1.93 3.70 1.77 2.66 2.68 0.476 0.227 0.179 0.0625
Mineral Dacita Porfirítica 553 1.67 3.42 1.75 2.49 2.42 0.365 0.134 0.147 0.0155
Mineral Mitu 179 2.00 3.50 1.50 2.69 2.67 0.328 0.108 0.122 0.0245
TS Mineral Brecha 67 2.51 4.14 1.63 3.34 3.34 0.403 0.163 0.121 0.0492
Mineral Calera Inf 407 1.84 4.13 2.29 2.90 2.87 0.476 0.226 0.164 0.0236
Mineral Calera Mid(fav) 666 1.889 3.89 2.00 2.82 2.74 0.425 0.180 0.151 0.0165
Mineral Calera Mid(var) 43 1.93 3.88 1.95 2.76 2.57 0.481 0.231 0.174 0.0733
Mineral Calera Sup 16 2.42 4.52 2.10 3.54 3.67 0.635 0.404 0.179 0.159
Mineral Conglomerado Shuco 4,059 2.33 4.34 2.00 3.29 3.262 0.440 0.194 0.134 0.00691
Mineral Conglomerado Transicional 1,850 2.15 4.08 1.936 3.08 3.05 0.408 0.166 0.132 0.00948
Mineral Dacita Porfirítica 750 2.09 3.46 1.37 2.72 2.68 0.227 0.0514 0.0835 0.00828
Mineral Deposito Piroclástico 2 2.65 3.25 0.60 2.95 2.95 0.421 0.178 0.143 0.298
Mineral Mitu 381 2.26 3.85 1.60 2.91 2.82 0.301 0.0908 0.104 0.0154
TN Mineral Calera Inferior 47 1.98 3.51 1.53 2.65 2.57 0.389 0.152 0.147 0.0568
Mineral Calera Mid(fav) 526 1.83 3.50 1.67 2.64 2.57 0.393 0.154 0.149 0.0171
Mineral Calera Mid(var) 67 1.83 3.33 1.50 2.53 2.47 0.334 0.111 0.132 0.0408
Mineral Calera Superior 107 1.79 3.68 1.89 2.74 2.63 0.476 0.226 0.174 0.0460
Mineral Conglomerado Shuco 2 2.62 2.67 0.05 2.64 2.64 0.0361 0.00130 0.0136 0.0255
Mineral Conglomerado Transicional 8 2.07 2.63 0.56 2.44 2.50 0.196 0.0384 0.0803 0.0692
Mineral Mitu 6 2.46 2.64 0.18 2.53 2.53 0.0639 0.00409 0.0252 0.0261

Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 113

11.5.5 Mineral Resources Classification

To conduct the resource classification, SRK considered a strategy based on multiple criteria:
● Representativeness of the data used in the estimation (samples and drillholes)
● Methodology of confidence limit
● Estimation quality (Slope of Regression – SoR)
● Structural Model Confidence
● QAQC Performance
Data used in the estimation
Buenaventura use a variable in their classification script to consider the samples and drillholes that are part of the classification criteria.  The variable was
calculated as the average anisotropic distance of the nearest three drillholes.   Based on this variable and on a number of holes participating in the block
estimation, the classification was made according to follow: measured when there is 3 or more drillholes, indicated when there is 2 or more drillholes and
inferred when there is 1 or more drillholes.  

Confident Limit

The confidence limit method was used by Buenaventura as other criteria to classify the resources.   This analysis was applied for two zones: Zinc zone
corresponding to the northern part of deposit (open pit: “Tajo Norte”) and Cooper Zone corresponding to middle and south part (open pit and underground),
“Tajo Sur” and “Marcapunta”, respectively.  The Figure 11-16 shows this limit.  

Figure 11-16:  Influence limit to classify the El Brocal resources

Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

The parameters to be evaluated according to the production volume of a month were determined as follow.  (Table 11-15)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 114

Table 11-15:  Summary of aspect to be evaluated in confident limit analysis

Zinc zone Copper Zone

Mining method Open Pit Mining Method Sub Level Stoping
Tonnes per day (t) 6,333 Tonnes per day (t) 5,000
Tonnes per month (t)) 190,000 Tonnes per month (t) 150,000
Tonnes per quarter (t) 570,000 Tonnes per quarter (t) 450,000
Volume per quarter (SG:2.58) 220,930 Volume per quarter (SG:3) 150,000
Volume 50x50x10m block 216,000 Volume 50x50x10m block 160,000

Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

Different scenarios of drilling mesh each 10 meters were defined.   Supported on the EDA and the variogram, the Kriging variance (KV) and the composite
variation coefficient (CV) were determined, too.  Then, the relative standard error and the confident limit to 90% are calculated for an annual production volume
(A90%), and the confident limit to 90% for a quarterly production volume (Q90%).  The results are summarized in Table 11-16 and Table 11-17.
Table 11-16:  Calculation of A90% and Q90% based for each drilling mesh for Zinc zone
Spacing CV Comp OKV RSE A90% Q90% Slope BDV KV/BDV
100x100 1.150 0.0950 0.35 17% 34% 0.9512 0.1902 0.50
80x80 1.150 0.0837 0.33 16% 32% 0.9385 0.1902 0.44
60x60 1.150 0.0651 0.29 14% 28% 0.9754 0.1902 0.34
50x50 1.150 0.0497 0.26 13% 25% 0.9934 0.1902 0.26
40x40 1.150 0.0331 0.21 10% 20% 0.9962 0.1902 0.17
30x30 1.150 0.0165 0.15 8% 15% 1.0036 0.1902 0.09
20x20 1.150 0.0091 0.11 6% 11% 1.0009 0.1902 0.05
10x10 1.150 0.0023 0.06 3% 6% 1.0011 0.1902 0.01

Source: Buenaventura, 2021

Table 11-17:  Calculation of A90% and Q90% based for each drilling mesh for Zinc zone

Spacing CV Comp OKV RSE A90% Q90% Slope BDV KV/BDV

100x100 1.190 1.190 0.0453 0.25 13% 25% 0.6085 0.0489
80x80 1.190 1.190 0.0482 0.26 13% 25% 0.5143 0.0489
60x60 1.190 1.190 0.0423 0.24 12% 24% 0.6130 0.0489
50x50 1.190 1.190 0.0374 0.23 11% 22% 0.6750 0.0489
40x40 1.190 1.190 0.0323 0.21 11% 21% 0.7745 0.0489
30x30 1.190 1.190 0.0209 0.17 9% 17% 0.8855 0.0489
20x20 1.190 1.190 0.0130 0.14 7% 13% 0.9344 0.0489
10x10 1.190 1.190 0.0045 0.08 4% 8% 0.9957 0.0489

Source: Buenaventura, 2021

Note:
KV = Kriging Variance for the estimation of a monthly volume
RSE = Relative Standard Error = CVComps x √KV
Q90% = Confidence Limit at 90% for a Quarterly Volume = (1.645 x RSE) / √3
A90% = Confidence Limit at 90% for an Annual Volume = (1.645 x RSE) / √12
BDV = Block Dispersion Variance

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 115

Finally, the spacing with error less or equal to 15% in Q90% is considered as Measured Resource.  The spacing with error less or equal to 15% in A90% is
considered as Indicated Resources.   These values are calculated from the plots show in Figure 11-17 and Figure 11-18, for Zinc zone and Copper zone,
respectively.  

Figure 11-17:  Plot of space vs error for Zn zone

Source: Buenaventura, 2021

Figure 11-18:  Plot of space vs error for Cu zone

Source: Buenaventura, 2021

After Confident Limit analysis, Buenaventura determined a spacing average of 25 m for measured and 50 m for indicated in Zinc zone; and the spacing
average in copper zone is 15 m for measured and 25 m for indicated resources.  
QAQC Performance

SRK carried out the evaluation to determine the risk due to the poor QAQC results in some areas of El Brocal deposit considering some parameters such as
the insertion of QAQC control samples in drilling program, analysis of the QAQC results (contamination, precision, and accuracy) and the results of the
mitigation work carried out by Buenaventura in 2021 to compensate the bad or absence of QAQC (i.e resampling, twin drilling, etc).  Then, a risk level was
assigned to each drillhole or zone within the deposit.  High risk with code 1 for poor QAQC or no QAQC results, medium risk with code 2, QAQC and mitigation
work with reasonable results, and low risk with code

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 116

3, with acceptable and good QAQC results.  Figure 11-19 shows the limits assignments in Brocal after evaluation.  

Figure 11-19:  Limits about the QAQC risk based in performance of results
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

Structural Model

The albescence of a structural model at the feasibility level means that the structural component is considered a risk in resource classification, especially in the
southern part.  

SRK carried out the evaluation to determine the risk associated with structural geology, which is an important control of mineralization in the deposit.  Some
criteria were considered to evaluate the level of risk such as: adequate reports, density, quality and confidence of structural data, confidence and
characteristics in the modeled faults and the quality of the structural model.   From this analysis, the risk associated with low, medium and high levels was
determined, dividing the deposit into 3 zones.  The northern part where the open pit is located presents a low risk, the middle part presents a medium risk level
and the southern part presents a high-risk level, principally due to the low structural information that is available and the conceptual structural model that it
presents.  (Figure 11-20)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 117

Figure 11-20:  Limits about the structural model risk based in confidence information and results
Source: SRK, 2021

Estimation Quality (SoR)

SKR suggested including a variable as the estimation accuracy in resources classification criteria.  Buenaventura used the slope of regression as an additional
criteria based on the knowledge and experience of other mines that use the same method.  These mines used the following ranges to classify the resources:
major to 0.8 for measured, between 0.4 and 0.8 for indicated, and inferred is 0.2 and 0.4.  

The suggested ranges (SoR) used in the classification have been tested and validated by a polymetallic mine in the last 10 years.  Therefore, they have been
calibrated based on operating and drilling data following CIM best practices year to year.  In addition, these deposits have been listed on the Toronto Stock
Exchange the last 15 years.

Based on the parameters mentioned above and the uncertainty associated to the classification, the valorization that will be used in the model classification are
summarized in the following tables  (Table 11-18  and Table 11-19).
Table 11-18:  Risk Associated to the Information and Estimation Results
Risk Code Observations
High 1 Associated to poor information and results
Medium 2 Associated to reasonable information and results

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 118

Risk Code Observations

Low 3 Associated to good information and results
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

Table 11-19:  Summary of Values that will be Used in the Classification

Test result Risk

Good Reasonable Poor
3 2 1
Slope of Regresión (SoR) <0.8 0.8 - 0.5 > 0.5 - 0.2
Confident Limit (range) Zn zone 25 50 150
Cu zone 15 25 100
Drill holes >=3 >=2 >=1
QAQC 3 2 1
Structural Model 3 2 1
Source: SRK, 2021 (SRK, 2021)

Finally, the resource classification will be performed block by block of the model through a script in Vulcan software, considering the addition of the score
associated to the risk according to the following criteria:
● Measured >= 13
● Indicated >= 9 y < 13
● Inferred < 9
To prevent the artifacts and the “spotted dog” effect, Buenaventura conducted a manual contouring to smooth the final model of the classification (Figure 11-
21).  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 119

Figure 11-21:  Resources Classification process

(above: scripted, below: smoothed, right: section location)
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

11.5.6 Reconciliation

SRK reviewed the results of the reconciliation carried out by Buenaventura and compared the estimated tons and grades of the resource model with the
monthly production of the 2020 and 2021 periods.  It should be noted that 2020 was an atypical year due to the SARS-COVID 19 pandemic, that's the reason
why in some months there was no production report.  

Buenaventura performs the reconciliation process using the results of the ore extracted from the mine (underground) and the metallurgical report of the
monthly processing plant.   The production results are obtained from the long-term resource model (tonnage and grade), include an exploitation wireframe
delivered by planning area (and topography) month by month, then the balance of the stockpiles is carried out at the beginning and end before being
transported to the plant.  Finally, the results of the monthly metallurgical report provided by the processing plant are delivered.

It is worth mentioning that the tonnage of the trucks or bins does not consider in this calculation, nor the material extracted from the open pit, because they
include other variables that are still in the implementation process by Buenaventura.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 120

SRK used this comparison for the review of the long-term resource model performance, in conjunction with the estimation validations (cross, visual, global and
local) and classification in order to provide opportunities for improvement in the estimation parameters and reduce biases in each updating in the resources
model.  

In opinion of SRK, El Brocal is performing reasonably in the current Mineral Resources estimate compared to the reconciled production periods (Table 11-20).
  However, for SRK there is still an opportunity for improvement in the grade interpolation because there are some months where copper and silver are
underestimated, and gold overestimated.  It must also implement a more robust reconciliation process that includes material from the open pit.  
Table 11-20:  Reconciliation for 2020 and 2021 Periods
Block model depletion and production Proccesing Plant  
Month Statitiscal Comparison
(underground)
Tonnes Cu Ag Au Tonnes Cu Ag Au Tonnes Cu Ag Au
t % Oz/t g/t t % Oz/t g/t t % Oz/t g/
Jan-2020 202,568 2.06 0.71 0.73 201,900 1.77 0.76 0.61 1.00 0.86 1.06 0.84
Feb-2020 164,344 2.56 0.63 0.57 175,165 1.92 0.62 0.59 1.07 0.75 0.98 1.04
Mar-2020 182,336 2.47 0.66 0.59 130,094 2.18 0.74 0.52 0.71 0.88 1.12 0.87
Jun-2020 162,751 2.02 0.66 0.57 154,849 2.11 0.72 0.53 0.95 1.05 1.09 0.92
Jul-2020 166,486 2.04 0.52 0.49 171,624 1.89 0.65 0.41 1.03 0.93 1.24 0.84
Aug-2020 192,681 2.12 0.56 0.52 164,619 1.91 0.60 0.55 0.85 0.90 1.07 1.05
Sep-2020 199,078 2.14 0.88 0.53 189,176 1.91 0.83 0.51 0.95 0.89 0.95 0.96
Oct-2020 215,287 2.72 0.97 0.63 200,187 2.09 0.85 0.58 0.93 0.77 0.88 0.91
Nov-2020 198,248 2.37 1.15 0.71 150,674 2.04 0.90 0.66 0.76 0.86 0.78 0.94
Dec-2020 91,870 1.80 0.67 0.56 121,442 1.99 1.22 0.55 1.32 1.11 1.82 0.99
Jan-2021 100,586 1.51 0.59 0.50 123,752 1.88 0.75 0.47 1.23 1.24 1.27 0.96
Feb-2021 154,357 2.17 0.82 0.73 174,102 1.76 0.73 0.64 1.13 0.81 0.89 0.88
Mar-2021 205,614 1.77 0.87 0.95 199,914 1.57 0.79 0.72 0.97 0.88 0.90 0.75
Apr-2021 198,761 1.73 0.80 1.05 206,908 1.58 1.03 0.76 1.04 0.91 1.30 0.72
May-2021 231,630 1.54 0.54 0.97 232,233 1.75 0.94 0.77 1.00 1.13 1.75 0.80
Jun-2021 190,110 1.55 0.68 0.88 205,314 1.72 0.93 0.78 1.08 1.12 1.37 0.89
Jul-2021 132,125 1.39 0.79 1.15 200,607 1.68 1.29 1.01 1.52 1.21 1.64 0.88
Aug-2021 205,866 1.60 0.67 1.11 138,987 1.82 1.35 0.93 0.68 1.14 2.01 0.84
Sep-2021 205,028 1.85 0.71 1.12 199,516 1.79 0.89 1.00 0.97 0.96 1.25 0.90
Oct-2021 233,295 1.27 0.71 0.94 259,817 1.68 0.97 0.89 1.11 1.32 1.37 0.95
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

11.5.7 Cut-off grade estimates

Due presence of copper, zinc and lead as valuable metal contents, the cut/off grade is expressed in terms of unit value or USD/t.

Cost Calculation
Cost calculation is based on unit values used for the mineral reserve’s definition.  A Marginal cost is calculated to be used a cut-off value to set the minimum
value of economically mineable stopes

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 121

and pit, for Mineral Resources definition purposes.   In case of open pit the cost calculation is considered for both lead and zinc ore zones, as well as the
copper zone, which have different destinations in the metallurgical plant.  

The cut-off value used to report Mineral Resources is based on the average operating costs for the operation in the year 2021, determined by the finance and
operations departments of Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  The Cut Off was differentiated according to the material treated in the plant (Pb-Zn, Cu and Bulk) that
have been taken into account when determining the cut-off value of Mineral Resources during 2021 for the Open Pit projects as shown in Table 11-21.

The zones determined by the planning area to be treated in the Pb-Zn plant have a mine cost of US$ 26.69/t.  Taking into account a contingency of 10% on
operating costs, a final NSR cut-off value of US$ 27.15/t is defined.

The zones determined by the planning area to be treated in the Cu plant have a mine cost of US$ 25.51/t.  Taking into account a contingency of 10% on
operating costs, a final NSR cut-off value of US$/t 25.97 is defined.

The zones determined by the planning area to be treated in the “Bulk” plant have a mine cost of US$22.25/t.  Taking into account a contingency of 10% on
operating costs, a final NSR cut-off value of US$ 22.71/t is defined.  
Table 11-21:  Cost structure for El Brocal resources (open pit)
Cost (US$/t)
Pb-Zn Cu Bulk
1. Mine 1.70 1.70 1.70
2. Pb-Zn Plant 15.88 14.80 11.84
3. Services 6.22 6.22 6.22
Sub-Total OPEX 23.80 22.72 19.76
4. Inventory and Exploration Expenses -0.66 -0.66 -0.66
Sub total 23.14 22.06 19.10
5. Administrative Expenses 1.51 1.51 1.51
6. Off Site Expenses 0.22 0.22 0.22
7. Sustaining CAPEX 1.25 1.25 1.25
9. Contingency (10%) (Fixed + Variable) 2.44 2.37 2.04
Sub Total 28.56 27.84 24.12
9. Contingency (10%) Internal (Fixed + Variable) 2.27 2.16 1.87
Sub Total - Contingency 26.69 25.51 22.25
Delta Mineral Stripping Cost 0.42 0.42 0.42
9. Contingency (10%) (Mineral Stripping Cost) 0.04 0.04 0.04
Total Cut Off* 27.15 25.97 22.71
*Total Cut Off is the sum of Sub Total - Contingency + Delta Mineral Stripping Cost + Contingency (10% Mineral Stripping Cost)
Source: Buenaventura, 2022 (Buenaventura, 2021)

In underground operation, Buenaventura considers five extraction methods: Pit Production R&P, Pillar Reclamation with debris fill (Secondary), Remaining
Mined Areas, Pillar Reclamation with cemented fill (Secondary) and 12x13 Chambers and Pillars with 5% cemented fill (Primary and Secondary) that have
been taken into account when determining the cut-off value of Mineral Resources during 2021 for the Underground projects, as shown in Table 11-22.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 122

The zones determined by the planning area to be extracted by Pit Production R&P mining method have a mine cost of US$ 33.75/t.  Taking into account a
contingency of 10% on operating costs, a final NSR cut-off value of US$ 37.48/t is defined.

The zones determined by the planning area to be extracted by the Pilar Recovery mining method with debris fill (Secondary) have an estimated mine cost of
US$ 27.79/t.  Taking into account a contingency of 10% on operating costs, a final NSR cut-off value of US$ 30.92/t is defined.
The zones determined by the planning area to be extracted by the Remaining Mined Areas mining method have an estimated mine cost of US$ 34.91/t.  Taking
into account a contingency of 10% on operating costs, a final NSR cut-off value of US$ 38.76/t is defined.
The zones determined by the planning area to be extracted by the Pilar Recovery mining method with cemented fill (Secondary) have an estimated mine cost
of US$ 35.08/t.  Taking into account a contingency of 10% on operating costs, a final NSR cut-off value of US$ 38.94/t is defined.
The zones determined by the planning area to be extracted by the 12x13 Chambers and pillars mining method with 5% cemented fill (Primary and Secondary)
have an estimated mine cost of US$ 37.05/t.  Taking into account a contingency of 10% on operating costs, a final NSR cut-off value of US$ 41.11/t is defined.
Table 11-22:  Cost structure for El Brocal resources (underground)

Cost (US$/t)

Chambers and pillars

Pillar recovery
Recovery of Pilar 12x13 with 5%
Stope Remaining with cemented
with detrital filling cemented filling
Production R&P Mined Areas filling
(Secondary) (Primary and
(Secondary)
Secondary)

1. Mine 18.95 12.98 20.11 20.27 22.25

2. Plant 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80
3. Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub total 33.75 27.79 34.91 35.08 37.05
4. Inventory and Exploration Expenses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub total Opex 33.75 27.79 34.91 35.08 37.05
5. Off Site Expenses 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36
6. Contingency (10%)* 3.37 2.78 3.49 3.51 3.71
Total Cut Off** 37.48 30.92 38.76 38.94 41.11
*Contingency = (Sub Total OPEX)*0.1
**Total Cut Off is the sum of SubTotal OPEX + Contingency + Off Site Expenses
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

11.5.8 Reasonable Potential for Economic Extraction (RPEE)

As part of the Mineral Resources estimation process, an evaluation was developed to determine the reasonability of material estimated into the block model of
El Brocal for economic extraction.  It to comply with resource disclosure requirements.  
● Mining method definition
● Cost definition set for mineral reserves definition
● Metallurgical parameters (non verified by SRK)
● NSR calculated and included as part of block model file (non replicated by SRK)
● Mineable stope and pit definition

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 123

● Underground (UG) and open pit (OP) cut-off and continuity

The RPEE process is similar to the mineral reserve definition process.  Details of the mineral reserve’s estimation process are contained in Chapters 12 and 13
of this report.  Table 11-23 shows a summary of the criteria and parameters used in this process.  
Table 11-23:  Parameters used for RPEE evaluation.  
Parameter Description Source

Vulcan Files
Block Model Resources Yp_brocal_886 (Open Pit) Buenaventura

Yp_brocal_443_Plan (Underground)

8,000 USD / t Cu Buenaventura

1,600 USD / Oz Au
Metal Prices

25 USD / Oz Ag

2,286 USD / t Pb

2,385 USD / t Zn

OP: (GradeZn(%)*11.12*Recovery
Zn(%)+GradeAg(Oz/t)*15.87*Recovery

AgZn(Oz/t)+GradePb(%)*12.93*Recovery

Pb(%)+GradeAg(Oz/t)*21.36*Recovery AgPb(Oz/t))/100
NSR Calculation Buenaventura

UG: (GradeCu(%)*48.58*Recovery

Cu(%)+GradeAu(g/t)*30.86*Recovery

Au(g/t)+GradeAg(Oz/t)*19.18*RecoveryAg(Oz/t))/100

OP: Zn: 27.14 USD / t ; Cu: 25.95 USD / t Buenaventura

Cut-off grade
UG: North and Center: 38.94 USD / t;

Southeast and Southwest: 37.49 USD / t and Southwest 2 and South: 41.12 USD / t
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

Metallurgical Recoveries

To define metallurgical parameters, Buenaventura have carried out studies to obtain metallurgical recoveries functions for mining zone.  Note that El Brocal has
two metallurgical plants that treat different minerals.   SRK cannot verify or replicate the assignment of metallurgical recoveries into the block model.  

The next tables summarize the criteria and formulas used to obtain metallurgical recoveries in El Brocal (Table 11-24).
Table 11-24:  Metallurgical recoveries functions for El Brocal

Metal Applicable Grade Range Metallurgical Recovery function 1

Cu Cu Grade (%) <= 0.20 0.00
0.20 < Cu Grade (%) <= 0.70 [ Cu Grade (%) - 0.20 ] / Cu Grade (%)
0.70 < Cu Grade (%) <= 1.935 LN [ Cu Grade (%) ] * 0.205 + 0.794
1.935 < Cu Grade (%) <= 2.50 0.05074 * Cu Grade (%) + 0.82932
2.50 < Cu Grade (%) 0.96

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 124

Ag Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 0.12 0.00

0.12 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 0.29 [ Ag Grade (oz/t) - 0.12 ] / Ag Grade (oz/t)
0.29 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 2.00 0.0665 * Ag Grade (oz/t) + 0.56669
2.00 < Ag Grade (oz/t) 0.70
Au Au Grade (g/t) <= 0.12 0.00
0.12 < Au Grade (g/t) <= 0.20 [ Au Grade (g/t) - 0.12 ] /Au Grade (g/t)
0.20 < Au Grade (g/t) <= 1.00 0.047582 * Au Grade (g/t) + 0.40008
1.00 < Au Grade (g/t) <= 1.50 0.344 * Au Grade (g/t) + 0.1040
1.50 < Au Grade (g/t) 0.62
Pb 2 3 0.00 < [ (Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] <= 0.40 [ Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] * 0.80 / Pb Grade (%)
0.40 < [ (Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] <= 0.80 [ Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] * 0.85 / Pb Grade (%)
0.80 < [ (Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] [ Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] * 0.90 / Pb Grade (%)
Ag 0.00 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 0.12 0.00
0.12 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 0.29 [ Ag Grade (oz/t) - 0.12 ] / Ag Grade (oz/t)
0.29 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 2.00 0.0665 * Ag Grade (oz/t) + 0.56669
2.00 < Ag Grade (oz/t) 0.70
[ [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] - [ Fe Grade (%) - 9.6 ]
Zn 4 5 Fe>9.6% 0.00 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 0.40

* 0.0216 ] * 0.60 / Zn Grade (%)

[ [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] - [ Fe Grade (%) - 9.60 ]
0.40 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 0.80

* 0.0216 ] * 0.65 / Zn Grade (%)

[ [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] - [ Fe Grade (%) - 9.60 ]
0.80 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 2.50

* 0.0216 ] * 0.68 / Zn Grade (%)

Fe<=9.6% 0.00 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 0.40 [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] * 0.60 / Zn Grade (%)
0.40 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 0.80 [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] * 0.65 / Zn Grade (%)
0.80 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 2.50 [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] * 0.68 / Zn Grade (%)
All 2.50 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] 0.68
Ag 0.00 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 0.35 0.00
0.35 < Ag Grade (oz/t) 0.249
Source: SRK, 2021
1 Grades expressed as a percentage must be considered in the same units in the recovery functions
2 Pb Grade refers to the total content of Lead. PbOx referes to the Lead Oxide content (expressed as a percentage)
3 Pb recovery functions are applicable only if [ Pb Grade > 0 ] AND [ Pb Grade - PbOx > 0 ]. Otherwise metallurgical recovery must be cosidered as zero
4 Zn Grade refers to the total content of Zinc. ZnOx refers to the Zinc Oxide content (expressed as a percentage)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 125

5 Zn recovery functions are applicable only if [ Zn Grade > 0 ] AND [ Zn Grade - ZnOx > 0 ]. Otherwise metallurgical recovery must be cosidered as zero

Based on mineral reserves process references, currently the deposit is mined using open pit and underground methods, the select mining method is sublevel
stopping for underground.  

Mineral Resources at northern zone (OP) are reported within a pit shell generated in whittle software.  Pit optimization input are noted as follows:
● Cut-off grade of 27.14 USD / t for Zinc ore and 25.95 USD / t for Cu ore.  
● Revenue factor of 1.00
● Pit Slope of 23.9 °
● Copper price of 8,000 USD / t; Zinc price of 2,385 USD / t; Lead price of 2,286 USD / t; Gold price of 1,600 USD / Oz and Silver price of 25 USD / Oz
● Cost is referential for processing of 20 k tpd
● Other costs can see in cost structures in Table 11-21
The input parameters were based on:
● Metal prices net selling cost including concentrate refining.
● Bench-marked mining, processing and general and administrative (G&A) costs based on estimates and current costs for similar sized and similar
types of operations in the region.
● Metallurgical recoveries are based on testing benchmarks.
● The pit shell was determined by evaluation of an NSR (see Table 11-23)
● The pit shell was restricted to copper–zinc mineralization that occurs on northern zone of El Brocal.
To prove reasonable perspectives for an economic extraction for El Brocal underground, Buenaventura constructed restrictive conceptual stopes for the
mineralized structures using Deswik Stope Optimizer ™, based on measured, indicated and inferred mineralized material, considering the structure width and
the net smelter return (NSR), limited to a differentiated Cut Off to limit the stopes generated.  
● Stope height: 15 to 35 m
● Stope length: 20 to 100 m
● Minimum width: 12 to 14 m
● Optimization variable: NSR
● Cut-Off: Marginal (see Table 11-25)
● Pillar length: 6 to 8 m
● Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources in the same process are considered within the optimization.

Table 11-25:  Cut-Off differentiated by Mining Method

Zone Cutoff (US$/t)

Marcapunta Este 37.5 & 41.1

Marcapunta Oeste 34.7

Marcapunta Oeste 2 38.4

Marcapunta Sur 38.4

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 126

Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

The pillars left in the ground do not correspond to square pillars (as it happens in the classical application of the method) but to a pillar along the entire mining
direction and that covers the extension of the mantle, these pillars are called "running pillar" as show the Figure 11-22.

Figure 11-22:  Schematic graph of Room and Pillar with long holes and Sub Level Stopping.
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

11.5.9 Uncertainty in the Mineral Resources Estimation

SRK has revised some aspects that can be considered as uncertainties in El Brocal Mine Mineral Resources estimation, which are:
● The density assigned in the block model has enough support for most of the estimation domains, however, there are some domains that have low
data density.  Buenaventura must conduct an additional sampling program in the next drilling program.  
● El Brocal must improve the geological interpretation to increase the confidence on the geological models, which must be supported with the
geological mapping of alterations, mineralization and lithology.  El Brocal structural model is a key and important point towards the southern part in
the underground zone.  
● The estimation domains for all the elements must be revised in detail to improve their definition.  There are zones where the model can be improved,
especially in those zones in which the grade interpolation is underestimated locally.  
● The resource classification that reflects resource estimation confidence is a key and sensitive aspect in El Brocal Mine, since although it is a mine
with production from 2011 and an extensive drilling program, it does not have enough measured resources due to several factors such as the lack of
a powerful structural model in the southern zone and the low QA/QC performance in some areas of El Brocal.  

11.5.10 Summary Mineral Resources

Buenaventura has reported the Mineral Resources for El Brocal on the December 2021 in accordance with U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Sk-1300.

Mineral Resources are considered potentially mineable by open pit and underground methods.  Buenaventura has stated the Mineral Resources in El Brocal
with a different cut-off grade for each type of mineral and mining method (open pit or underground).

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 127

Buenaventura reported inside an optimized pit shell for open pit zone, considering that, for both lead and zinc ore zones, as well as the copper zone, which
have different destinations in the metallurgical plant.  Buenaventura reported inside an stope shell for underground zone.  
The details of the Mineral Resources report of the mine are shown in Table 11-26, Table 11-27 and Table 11-28.
Table 11-26:  Zn-Pb Mineral Resources Statement, Open Pit, El Brocal Mine, Department of Pasco - Peru, December 31, 2021.  
Resources Category Tonnes Ag Pb Zn Cu As Fe NSR
000's Oz/t % % % % % US$/t
Zn-Pb ore Measured 1,089 0.47 1.25 3.78 0.01 0.00 17.71 42.51
Indicated 1,292 1.22 0.91 3.05 0.07 0.03 13.48 48.76
Measured & Indicated 2,381 0.88 1.06 3.39 0.04 0.02 15.41 45.90
Inferred 1,986 3.31 0.33 1.02 0.07 0.09 8.69 65.63
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

Table 11-27:  Cu Mineral Resources Statement, Open Pit, El Brocal Mine, Departament of Pasco - Peru, December 31, 2021.
Resources Category Tonnes Ag Pb Zn Cu As Fe NSR
000’s Oz/t % % % % % US$/t
Cu ore Measured 28 4.48 0.25 0.44 2.95 0.66 4.88 196.32
Indicated 1,173 0.83 0.11 0.23 1.72 0.44 7.34 85.91
Measured & Indicated 1,201 0.92 0.12 0.23 1.75 0.44 7.28 88.49
Inferred 13,844 0.49 0.08 0.07 1.54 0.39 11.77 73.05
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

Table 11-28: Cu Mineral Resources Statement, Underground Mine, El Brocal, Department of Pasco - Peru, December 31, 2021.
Resources Category Tonnes Ag Cu Au As Fe NSR
000’s Oz/t % g/t % % US$/t
Cu ore Measured 893 1.33 2.64 1.04 0.86 19.17 152.56
Indicated 28,704 0.80 1.59 0.87 0.53 20.43 92.35
Measured & Indicated 29,597 0.81 1.62 0.88 0.54 20.39 94.17
Inferred 19,679 0.73 1.76 0.80 0.53 16.31 98.77
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

Notes to accompany Mineral Resources tables:

● The reference point for the Mineral Resources estimate is insitu. The estimate has an effective date of 31 december, 2021. The Qualified Person Firm responsible for the resource estimate is
SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A.
● Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of those Mineral Resources converted to mineral reserves.   Mineral Resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
● Resources have been reported as in situ (hard rock within optimized pit shell and stopes).

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

 SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 128

● Resources have been categorized subject to the opinion of a QP based on the amount/robustness of informing data for the estimate, consistency of geological/grade distribution, survey
information, and have been validated against long term mine reconciliation for the in-situ volumes.
● The estimate uses the following key input parameters: commodity prices of 8,000 USD / t Cu, 1,600 USD / Oz Au, 25 USD / Oz Ag, 2,286 USD / t Pb and 2,385 USD / t Zn; life-of-mine average
metallurgical recoveries was assigned to the block model using defined functions, sublevel stopping mining method is considered; inclusion of internal and external dilution; mining costs;
processing costs; no allocation for general and administrative costs; and an allocation for sustaining capital cost. All these parameters can be seen in detail in Table 11-21, 11-22, 11-23 and 11-
24.
● Mineral Resources are reported inside optimized pit and optimized stopes designed above a net smelter return cut-off of: for Open Pit: Zn: 27.14 USD / t ; Cu: 25.95 USD / t; and for
Underground: North an Center: 38.94 USD / t; Southeast and Southwest: 37.49 USD / t and Southwest 2 and South: 41.12 USD / t
● The NSR equations are:
- Open Pit: GradeZn(%)*11.12*Recovery Zn(%)+GradeAg(Oz/t)*15.87*Recovery AgZn(Oz/t)+GradePb(%)*12.93*Recovery Pb(%)+GradeAg(Oz/t)*21.36*Recovery AgPb(Oz/t))/100
- Underground: GradeCu(%)*48.58*Recovery Cu(%)+GradeAu(g/t)*30.86*Recovery Au(g/t)+GradeAg(Oz/t)*19.18*RecoveryAg(Oz/t))/100
● Mineral Resources tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and    numbers may not add due to rounding.

11.5.11 Mineral Resources Sensitivity

Factors that may affect estimates include metal price and exchange rate assumptions; changes in the assumptions used to generate the cut-off grade; changes
in local interpretations of the geometry of mineralization and continuity of mineralized zones; changes in geological form and mineralization and assumptions of
geological and grade continuity; variations in density and domain assignments; geometallurgical assumptions; changes in geotechnical, mining, dilution and
metallurgical recovery assumptions; switch to design and input parameter assumptions pertaining to conceptual stope designs that constrain estimates; and
assumptions as to the continued ability to access the site, retain title to surface and mineral rights, maintain environmental and other regulatory permits, and
maintain the social license to operate.

There are no other known environmental, legal, title, tax, socioeconomic, marketing, political or other factors that could materially affect the estimate of Mineral
Resources or Mineral Reserves that are not discussed in this Report.

To demonstrate the sensitivity of the El Brocal Mineral Resources to metal value cut-off, a grade-tonnage curve was developed to show changes in Mineral
Resources tonnage and copper and zinc grade to changes in the metal value cut-off.  A grade-tonnage curve was estimated for each mining zone and method
to show the effect of varying the NSR cut-off value in tonnes and the NSR value.  (Figure 11-23, Figure 11-24 and Figure 11-25)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 129

Figure 11-23: Grade-Tonnage Curve for measured and indicated Mineral Resources for Open Pit (Zinc Zone).
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

Figure 11-24: Grade-Tonnage Curve for measured and indicated Mineral Resources for Open Pit (Copper Zone).
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

Figure 11-25:  Grade-Tonnage Curve for measured and indicated Mineral Resources for Underground.  
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (Buenaventura, 2021)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 130

12 Mineral Reserve Estimates

El Brocal is an operating mine that uses conventional open pit and underground methods to extract mineral reserves. The underground mining method used is
Room and Pillar, with variations of backfill and mining sequence that are adapted to the shape of the ore deposit and ground conditions. Additionally, the SLS
mining method is considered in the Life of Mine plan using primary and secondary stopes with cemented backfill. Separate mineral reserve estimates were
generated for the open pit and underground mines. A combined mineral reserve statement is provided in Section 12.6. The open pit and underground mining
areas are located entirely on land owned by Buenaventura or under surface use agreements with the owners. There are no royalties applicable on the reported
mineral reserves areas.

Proven and probable mineral reserves are converted from measured and indicated Mineral Resources. Conversion is based on pit optimization results (only
open pit), mine design, mine sequence and economic evaluation. The in situ value is calculated from the estimated grade and certain modifying factors.

The mine LoM plans and resulting mineral reserves stated in this report are based on pre-feasibility level studies.

Mineral reserves effective date is December 31st, 2021

12.1 Open Pit Mineral Reserves

12.1.1 Introduction

The open-pit mineral reserves are located in one main open pit location. Material is hauled by truck from the pit to an existing crusher facility located on the
west side of the open pit. Waste material is hauled by truck to the appropriate waste dump location.

A regularized block model used has a cell size of 4 m x 4 m x 6 m. This block size is considered appropriate for the mining cycle at El Brocal. A dilution
between 10% and 44% was introduced for the ore blocks located in the boundary ore-waste materials and an ore loss of 2% was considered for the ore
materials in general. No further ore losses or ore dilution were applied.

12.1.2 Key Assumptions, Parameters, and Methods Used

The open pit mineral reserves are reported within a pit design based on open pit optimization results. The optimization included measured and indicated
Mineral Resources categories. The pit shell used to define mineral reserves was based on a selected Revenue Factor 1.00 shell. This choice is aligned with a
policy of El Brocal to maximize the LoM to confirm inferred resources and adequate delimitation of the ore located in zones adjacent to older underground
operations. Inferred material (approximately 30% of measured and indicated resources) within the reserve pit design was treated as waste and given a zero
value. Optimization carried out in Minesight® software and parameters are shown in Table 12-1.
Table 12-1:  Lerchs & Grossmann Optimization Parameters
Parameter Unit Value
Base mining cost US$/t rock 1.87
Incremental mining cost (by bench) * US$/t rock 0.013
Processing cost    
Plant Cu US$/t ore 17.47
SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 131

Parameter Unit Value

Plant PbZn US$/t ore 16.28
G&A cost US$/t ore 6.84
Metallurgical recovery ** % By function
Mill throughput    
Plant Cu (Plant 1) t/day 8,000
Plant PbZn (Plant 2) t/day 10,500
Royalties % 0.00
Source: Buenaventura (compiled and verified by SRK)
* Incremental cost is calculated in reference to the ramp exit level
** Metallurgical recovery was assigned to the block model using defined functions

Geotechnical Parameters

The open pit slope angles used for the pit optimization and mine design are based on geotechnical studies and range from 31° to 36° according to the
geotechnical sectors shown in Figure 12-1.

Figure 12-1:  Design recommendations for open pit design 2020

Source: SRK

Methodology

A 3D mine design, based on the selected pit shell, was completed using Minesight ® software and is the basis for the open pit reserves..

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 132

The steps applied in the conversion process from Mineral Resources to mineral reserves included:
● Import resource block model;
● Assignment of metallurgical recoveries into an attribute of the block model;
● Identify the zones adjacent to mined underground sectors;
● Compute NSR cut-off (internal and economic);
● Compute the revenue function per block on the resource model, considering as valuable blocks those that correspond to measured and indicated
categories;
● Based on the internal cut-off, determine the border of ore-waste material;
● Assignment of ore dilution of 9% (for each cell face exposed to waste) to ore blocks located on the limit with waste block. Assignment of ore loss of
2% to all ore blocks;
● Re-evaluation of border ore-waste;
● Configure geotechnical sectors and overall slope angles;
● Pit optimization using Minesight® and algorithm Lerchs and Grossmann;
● Final pit selection and push-back definition;
● Pit design based on final pit shell envelope and selected push backs;
● Validate the equipment fleet;
● Prepare a production schedule;
● Tabulate mineral reserves.

12.1.3 Mining Dilution and Mining Recovery

Dilution was assigned to the ore blocks located in the boundary with waste blocks and depends on the number of exposed faces to the waste blocks
determined in an XY plan view (See Figure 12-2). The range of percentage dilution assigned is from 10% to 44%, as shown in Table 12-2.
Additional over-cost is considered for blocks around voids to cover operational mining costs (different from the recognition cost defined previously). This over-
cost is calculated using the attribute of underground topography of the block model. The TOPUG attribute calculates the percentage or portion of the cell (block
model) inside the underground mined solids
The function applied to calculate the over-cost is:
Over-cost = 6.85 * TopUG%
The result is expressed as US$/t
Table 12-2:  OP in-situ dilution values

Number of exposed sides

Dilution in-situ
per block (XY plane) *

1 9%
2 17%
3 24%
4 31%
Source: SRK, June 2021

* Corresponds to n: Number of exposed faces in Figure 12-2

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 133

Figure 12-2:  Ore envelope and dilution application criterion

Source: SRK, June 2021

The assumed mining recovery was 98% (equivalent to an ore loss of 2%) applied evenly for all ore blocks.

12.1.4 Cut Off Grades

An NSR cut-off was used in preference to a grade cut-off, considering that El Brocal is a polymetallic mine selling a different type of concentrates. Valuable
contents are: copper, silver, lead, zinc and gold.

Cut-off grades definition are based on three last years (2018 to 2020) historical cost and consider a detailed analysis process including:
● Analysis of the complete operating cost database managed through SAP System (Datamart);
● Analysis of Buenaventura corporative and headquarters costs (including non 100% Buenaventura owned subsidiary companies like El Brocal);
● Comparative analysis of Buenaventura costs reported in public domain sources;
● Identification of the one-off costs and other expenses non-related to mine operations;
● Estimation of sustaining CAPEX;
● Assessment of current and future conditions of mine operations.
For el Brocal open pit mine, two NSR cut-off values were defined according to a common practice in an open pit reserves assessment:
● Economic cut-off: including mining, processing plant and administrative costs;
● Internal cut-off: including processing plant and administrative costs.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 134

Mineral reserves and delimitation of limits for ore-waste material were stated using the internal NSR cut-off value.

Inputs for NSR cut-off calculation and estimated NSR cut-off are listed in Table 12-3 and Table 12-4.
Table 12-3:  OP NSR cut-off Input parameters

Item Unit Value

Mining cost  
Ore US$/t mined 2.32
Waste US$/t mined 1.87
Process cost    
Plant Pb Zn US$/t processed 17.47
Plant Cu US$/t processed 16.28
General and administrative costs US$/t processed 6.84
Sustaining capital cost US$/t processed 1.38
Off site cost (corporate) US$/t processed 1.00
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (compiled by SRK)

Table 12-4:  OP NSR cut-off value

Item Unit Value

NSR Internal cut-off  
Plant Pb Zn US$/t processed 27.15
Plant Cu US$/t processed 25.97
NSR Economic cut-off    
Plant Pb Zn US$/t processed 29.02
Plant Cu US$/t processed 27.84
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (compiled by SRK)

12.2 Underground Mineral Reserves

12.2.1 Introduction
The underground mine is operated using Room and Pillar and Sub Level Stoping. Material is hauled by truck from the underground zone to an existing crusher
facility located on the west side of the open pit.
A block model sub-bloqued to a cell size of 4 m x 4 m x 3 m is used for the underground mineral reserves estimation process. This block size is considered
appropriate for the ore selectivity and mine design process. A dilution between 4% and 10% was introduced for the designed stope and an ore loss of 4% was
considered for the ore materials in general. No further ore losses or ore dilution were applied.

12.2.2 Key Assumptions, Parameters, and Methods Used

The underground mineral reserves are reported within mine stopes designed using the software Deswik®. Stope design included an internal dilution sourced
from inferred material and non-categorized material (hanging wall and footing wall).

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 135

Stope designs are generated automatically using the “Deswik stope optimizer” (DSO) included as a module of Deswik® software. Parameters for the
application of DSO algorithm are according to the geotechnical evaluation detailed in Section Error! Reference source not found..
Mineral reserves definition process was developed considering specific conditions of the mining method, which allow differentiated parameters and operating
cost schemas. Mining methods (including variations) considered are:
SLS
Mining in a sequence of primary and secondary stopes using cemented backfill in the primary stopes to allow the access into the secondary stopes.
R&P primary stopes
Mining longitudinal stopes leaving intermediate pillars to guarantee ground stability
R&P pillar recovery w/ cemented backfill
Recovery of pillars left by previous mining underground operations. Considering the ground conditions, it is necessary to fill the cavities adjacent to the pillar
using cemented backfill to guarantee stability during mining operations to recover pillars.
R&P remanent
This entails recovering pillars left during the mining operations in the past periods in zones that are not adjacent to the current operation. For this mining, it will
be necessary to apply preparation adits or by-pass to allow access to the operation zone
Designed stopes and their internal materials consider the following criteria:
● Characteristics of material inside the stope wireframe are calculated considering it as a unique entity, including total tonnage, diluted grades and
diluted NSR;
● The Mineral Resources category assigned to the whole material inside the wireframe corresponds to the lowest category existing inside the solid. Due
to this process, part of material initially categorized as measured resources is reassigned to indicated resources and, as a consequence, becomes part
of probable reserves;
● An additional dilution percentage was considered for external (or unplanned) dilution. This percentage is assigned evenly to the reported material
inside designed stopes wireframes;
● Inferred and non-categorized material within the stope designed wireframes was treated as waste and given a zero value (grade and NSR).
For dilution purposes and according to geotechnical evaluation, the expected rock overbreak is between 0.40 m to 0.50 m in the hanging wall and footing wall.
ELOS parameter used in the configuration of DSO for mine design stopes process is 0.45 m.
Methodology
A 3D mine design, was completed using Deswik® software and is the basis for the underground reserves.
The steps applied in the conversion process from Mineral Resources to mineral reserves included:
● Import resource block model;
● Assignment of metallurgical recoveries into an attribute of the block model;
● Compute NSR cut-off (economic and marginal);
● Compute economic revenue per block of the resource model (measured and indicated categories);

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 136

● Identify and analyze the economic envelope (revenue ≥ NSR cut-off);

● Identify the isolated and remote zones with regard to main operating zones or in relation to the principal zone defined as Mineral Resources;
● Design mine development , access and preparation headings for new mining areas;
● Set up Deswik® “Deswik Stope Optimiser” (DSO) module with mining unit dimension, mining dilution and NSR cut-off;
● Run Deswik® DSO module in the economic envelope. Review and adjust inputs as necessary, rerun Deswik DSO module in the economic envelope
as needed;
● Validate the equipment fleet;
● Preliminary reserve confidence categories whereby measured and indicated Mineral Resources portions of stopes were modified to proven and
probable mineral reserves respectively;
● Final operational and economic stope review (only stopes that have mineral reserves classified) to eliminate stopes that do not comply with the pre-set
operational and economic criteria;
● Mine planning;
● Tabulate mineral reserves

12.2.3 Mining Dilution and Mining Recovery

Mining dilution and mining recovery for each stope were estimated taking into consideration the planned mining method and stope design.
Mining dilution is assumed to be from an inferred resource, non-categorized material or low-grade material entering the stope during mining, backfilling material
and shotcrete. Mining dilution was incorporated considering two sources:
● Internal or planned dilution corresponds to material included as part of designed stopes that is different from measured or indicated Mineral Resources;
● External or unplanned dilution is generated by the impact of different activities of the mining cycle (blasting, loading, hauling, others). This material is
included in the form of a percentage allowance of the in-situ estimated tonnage of the stope.
Mining dilution formula used for the mineral reserves estimation and calculations is:

Mining recovery was defined on the basis of historical topographic records and tracked stopes, which were monitored with CMS (Cavity Monitoring System) to
measure and control mining recovery and mining dilution percentages. There were 180 stopes monitored with CMS in 2019 and  2020.

The mining method used is Room and Pilar, including variations of mining sequence (primary and secondary stopes), backfill type and specific operational
aspects.

Consolidated values for mining recovery and mining dilution are shown in Table 12-55.
Table 12-5:  Underground in-situ dilution values

Mining Method Dilution Recovery

R&P Primary 4% 95%
R&P Pillar Recov 10% 95%
R&P Remanent 4% 95%

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 137

Mining Method Dilution Recovery

SLS 4% 95%
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (reviewed by SRK)

* R&P: refers to Room and Pîllar mining method

12.2.4 Cut Off Grades

An NSR cut-off was used rather than a grade cut-off, considering that El Brocal is a polymetallic mine that sells a different type of concentrates. Valuable
contents are: copper, silver, lead, zinc and gold.

Cut-off grades definition are based on the historical cost of the last three years (2018-2020) and consider a detailed analysis process including:
● Analysis of the complete operating cost database managed through SAP System (Datamart);
● Analysis of Buenaventura corporative and headquarters costs (including non 100% Buenaventura owned subsidiary companies like El Brocal);
● Comparative analysis of Buenaventura costs reported in public domain sources.
● Identification of the one-off costs and other expenses non-related to mine operations;
● Estimation of sustaining CAPEX;
● Assessment of current and future conditions of mine operations.
For El Brocal underground mine, five variances of mining method were considered and for each mining method, two NSR cut-off values were defined:
● Economic cut-off: including fixed and variable costs for mining, processing plant and administrative costs;
● Marginal cut-off: including only variable cost.
Mineral reserves were stated using the marginal NSR cut-off value.

Inputs for NSR cut-off calculation and estimated NSR cut-off are listed in Table 12-6 and Table 12-7.
Table 12-6:  NSR cut-off Input parameters for underground operations

R&P R&P R&P

Item Unit


SLS
Primary Pillar Recov Remanent
Mining cost US$/t ore 27.88 29.33 29.15 31.51
Process cost - Plant Cu US$/t processed 16.28 16.28 16.28 16.28
General and Adm. costs US$/t processed 6.84 6.84 6.84 6.84
Sustaining capital cost US$/t processed 2.29 2.29 2.29 2.29
Off site cost (corporate) US$/t processed 1.47 1.47 1.47 1.47
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (compiled by SRK)

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 138

Table 12-7:  NSR cut-off value for underground operations

R&P R&P R&P

Item Unit


SLS
Primary Pillar Recov Remanent
NSR Economic cut-off        
Plant Cu US$/t processed 54.76 56.21 56.03 58.39
NSR Marginal cut-off          
Plant Cu US$/t processed 37.49 38.94 38.76 41.12
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (compiled by SRK)

12.3 Metallurgical Recovery

El Brocal operates two plants (Plant 1: Cu, Plant 2: Pb-Zn) and produces three types of concentrates (copper, zinc and lead). Metallurgical recoveries were
estimated considering operational conditions and were assigned to the block model as an attribute. Currently Plant 2 process copper ore by camapigns of
approximately 30 days/ year.

Recovery percentages are defined using formulas and grade range of application (when it applies). These formulas were developed based on:
● Analysis of the last three years of statistical data and metallurgical performance of the plant;
● Historical metallurgical testing results, and the latest results (2021) from the metallurgical testing campaign using representative samples collected from
the mineral reserves sectors.
Using the available information from the mining and metallurgical disciplines, SRK developed specific mathematical expressions for the Copper Plant and the
Lead-Zinc Plant. Data support and details of analysis (formulas and graphic representation) are included in chapters 10 and 14.

SRK considers that there are significant room to improve the accuracy of the mathematical expressions, and strongly recommends continuing efforts to collect
detailed operational data as well as executing metallurgical tests to increase the accuracy of the Reserves & Resources estimates.

Curves and formulas are shown as follows by plant and element according to plants and products showed in Table 12-88.
Table 12-8:  El Brocal processing plants and products
Recoverable
Throughput Saleable
Plant and Payable

(tpd) products

contents *

Copper
Plant 1 8,000
Copper
concentrates
Silver
Gold
Lead
Plant 2 ** 10,500
Lead
concentrates
Silver
Zinc

Zinc
concentrates
Silver
Source: Buenaventura, 2021 (compiled by SRK)

* By contract, other elements can be payable. Listed elements are considered for mineral reserves estimation purposes
** Plant 2 can process Copper ores by campaigns at 9,500 tpd
For material processed through Plant 1 (Copper), functions are detailed in Table 12-99 and graphs are shown in in Figure 12-3, Figure 12-4 and Figure 12-5,
differentiated by metal and grade ranges.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 139

Table 12-9:  Metallurgical recovery functions - Copper Concentrate

Metal Applicable Grade Range Metallurgical Recovery function *

Cu Cu Grade (%) <= 0.20 0.00
0.20 < Cu Grade (%) <= 0.70 [ Cu Grade (%) - 0.20 ] / Cu Grade (%)
0.70 < Cu Grade (%) <= 1.935 LN [ Cu Grade (%) ] * 0.205 + 0.794
1.935 < Cu Grade (%) <= 2.50 0.05074 * Cu Grade (%) + 0.82932
2.50 < Cu Grade (%) 0.96
Ag Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 0.12 0.00
0.12 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 0.29 [ Ag Grade (oz/t) - 0.12 ] / Ag Grade (oz/t)
0.29 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 2.00 0.0665 * Ag Grade (oz/t) + 0.56669
2.00 < Ag Grade (oz/t) 0.70
Au Au Grade (g/t) <= 0.12 0.00
0.12 < Au Grade (g/t) <= 0.20 [ Au Grade (g/t) - 0.12 ] /Au Grade (g/t)
0.20 < Au Grade (g/t) <= 1.00 0.047582 * Au Grade (g/t) + 0.40008
1.00 < Au Grade (g/t) <= 1.50 0.344 * Au Grade (g/t) + 0.1040
1.50 < Au Grade (g/t) 0.62
Source: SRK, 2021

* Grades expressed as a percentage must be considered as decimal numbers in the recovery functions

Figure 12-3:  Cu recovery in Copper Concentrate

Source: SRK, 2021

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 140

Figure 12-4:  Ag recovery in Copper Concentrate

Source: SRK, 2021

Figure 12-5:  Au recovery in Copper Concentrate

Source: SRK, 2021

For material processed through Plant 2 (Lead & Zinc), functions were developed for Lead concentrate and Zinc concentrate.

Lead concentrate functions are detailed in Table 12-10 and its corresponding graphs are shown in Figure 12-6 and Figure 12-7, differentiated by metal and
grade ranges. Lead recovery in Lead Concentrates depends on the presence of oxidation (represented by PbOx grades).

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 141

Table 12-10: Metallurgical recovery functions - Lead Concentrate

Metal Applicable Grade Range Metallurgical Recovery function *

Pb ** *** 0.00 < [ (Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] <= 0.40 [ Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] * 0.80 / Pb Grade (%)
0.40 < [ (Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] <= 0.80 [ Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] * 0.85 / Pb Grade (%)
0.80 < [ (Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] [ Pb Grade (%) - PbOx (%) ] * 0.90 / Pb Grade (%)
Ag 0.00 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 0.12 0.00
0.12 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 0.29 [ Ag Grade (oz/t) - 0.12 ] / Ag Grade (oz/t)
0.29 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 2.00 0.0665 * Ag Grade (oz/t) + 0.56669
2.00 < Ag Grade (oz/t) 0.70
Source: SRK, 2021

* Grades expressed as a percentage must be considered in the same units in the recovery functions
** Pb Grade refers to the total content of Lead. PbOx refers to the Lead Oxide content (expressed as a percentage)

*** Pb recovery functions are applicable only if [ Pb Grade > 0 ] AND [ Pb Grade - PbOx > 0 ]. Otherwise metallurgical recovery must be considered as zero

Figure 12-6:  Pb recovery in Lead Concentrate

Source: SRK, 2021

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 142

Figure 12-7:  Ag recovery in Lead Concentrate

Source: SRK, 2021

Zinc concentrate functions are detailed in Table 12-11 and its corresponding graphs are shown in Figure 12-8 and Figure 12-9, differentiated by metal and
grade ranges. Zinc recovery in Zinc Concentrates depends on the presence of oxidation (represented by ZnOx grades) and the presence of Fe. Low grades of
Fe (below 9.6 %Fe) show higher recoveries than high grades of Fe.
Table 12-11:  Metallurgical recovery functions - Zinc Concentrate

Metal Applicable Grade Range Metallurgical Recovery function *

[ [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] - [ Fe Grade (%) - 9.6 ]
Zn ** *** Fe>9.6% 0.00 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 0.40

* 0.0216 ] * 0.60 / Zn Grade (%)

[ [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] - [ Fe Grade (%) - 9.60 ]
0.40 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 0.80

* 0.0216 ] * 0.65 / Zn Grade (%)

[ [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] - [ Fe Grade (%) - 9.60 ]
0.80 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 2.50

* 0.0216 ] * 0.68 / Zn Grade (%)

Fe<=9.6% 0.00 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 0.40 [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] * 0.60 / Zn Grade (%)
0.40 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 0.80 [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] * 0.65 / Zn Grade (%)
0.80 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] <= 2.50 [ Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] * 0.68 / Zn Grade (%)
All 2.50 < [ (Zn Grade (%) - ZnOx (%) ] 0.68
Ag 0.00 < Ag Grade (oz/t) <= 0.35 0.00
0.35 < Ag Grade (oz/t) 0.249
Source: SRK, 2021
* Grades expressed as a percentage must be considered in the same units in the recovery functions
** Zn Grade refers to the total content of Zinc. ZnOx refers to the Zinc Oxide content (expressed as a percentage)

*** Zn recovery functions are applicable only if [ Zn Grade > 0 ] AND [ Zn Grade - ZnOx > 0 ]. Otherwise metallurgical recovery must be cosidered as zero

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 143

Figure 12-8:  Zn recovery in Zinc Concentrate (Fe <= 9.6%)

Source: SRK, 2021

Figure 12-9:  Ag recovery in Zinc Concentrate

Source: SRK, 2021

12.4 NSR Block value

El Brocal is a polymetallic mine operation, producing 3 types of concentrates. In this sense, the mineral reserves were estimated under the concept of multiple
commodity ore based on the following products:
● Concentrate Cu (by-products: Ag, Au)
● Concentrate Pb (by-product: Ag)
● Concentrate Zn (by-product: Ag)
NSR block value estimation considers the contribution of the different elements that generate value in the sale of concentrates, taking into consideration the
following aspects:
● Metal prices;

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 144

● Metallurgical recovery, included as an attribute in the block model;

● Payable contents in the saleable product;
● Commercial deductions, as such: RC, TC, penalties;
● Selling expenses, as such: transport, insurance, supervision, sampling, logistic costs.
NSR value calculation uses a serie of “unit values” calculated for each metal, which contributes to the saleable products' value. The “unit value” consolidates
the into a unique factor the following aspects into a unique factor: payable contents, commercial deductions and selling expenses.

Metal prices were stated by Buenaventura, based on market study and long-term consensus sources. Metal prices are listed in Table 12-12 and are coherent
with the results of Market Study (Chapter 16) carried out by CRU Group.
Table 12-12:  Metal Prices for mineral reserves definition

Metal and Units Price

Copper (US$/t) 8,000
Silver (US$/oz) 25
Lead (US$/t)an 2,286
Zinc (US$/t) 2,385
Source: Buenaventura

Due to the complexity of El Brocal mineralization and multiple saleable products, several contracts are managed by El Brocal to commercialize its products.
Currently, El Brocal has nine active contracts with different traders (two to four  for each type of concentrate) with terms between one to three years.

Unit values calculated used to determine the NSR block value are shown in Table 12-13.
Table 12-13:  Estimated unit value by metal and type of concentrate
Concentrate Unit value by Metal (US$ / unit of grade) *
Au Ag ** Pb Zn Cu
Copper concentrate 30.86 19.18     48.58
Lead concentrate   21.36 12.93    
Zinc concentrate   15.87   11.12  
Grade units *** Au (g/t) Ag (oz/t) Pb (%) Zn (%) Cu (%)
Source: Buenaventura (verified by SRK)
* Unit value is used as a factor (multiplied by recoverable content) to calculate the value contribution (US$/t)
** For silver, the "unit value" applies only to the portion of silver grade recoverable in each concentrate
*** Grades must be expressed in the indicated units to use the formula

12.5 Material Risks Associated with the Modifying Factors

SRK has identified the following material risks associated with the modifying factors:

Mining Dilution and Mining Recovery:

The mining dilution estimate depends on the accuracy of the resource model as it relates to internal waste.  LOM considers the uses of Room and Pillar and
Sub Level Stoping mining methods using cemented backfill.  SRK considers that dilution and mine recovery assumed is reasonable but

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 145

requires deeper analysis, and it represents a risk that could impact grades and tonnage of Run of Mine ore.

Impact of Currency Exchange Rates on Production Cost:

The operating costs are modeled in US Dollars (US$) within the cash flow model. The foreign exchange rate profile has not been analyzed in detail.
Considering that only a portion of the cost and expenses are in local currency (Peruvian Soles) and given the high variability of the exchange rate over the last
two years, the operating cost could be impacted.

Additionally, inflation rates, which were very stable in Peru over the ten years prior to 2021, have started to show variations and their evolution down the line is
unpredictable.

Geotechnical Parameters:

Geotechnical parameters used to estimate the mineral reserves can change as mining progresses. Local slope failures could force the operation to adapt to a
lower slope angle which would cause the strip ratio to increase and the economics of the pit to change.

Processing Plant Throughput:

The mine plan shows yearly periods in which the total ore processed corresponds to copper ore. This condition requires that both plants (1 and 2) will operate
to produce only copper concentrates. There are no antecedents of both plants working on  copper ore treatment on a permanent basis, which could cause an
impact on the operational cost or processing capacity. Currently Plant 2 process copper ore by campaigns of approximately 30 days/ year.

Politics:

Uncertainty in the local political situation can generate impacts on the cost, facilities, or conditions to operate the mining unit, in consequence, a possible
impact on the mineral reserves would occur,

Deleterious elements:

Contents of Arsenic in the ore and the saleable concentrates require particular conditions to commercialize the copper concentrates. Currently, Buenaventura
has contracts with smelters to treat this type of concentrates. The possible impact on the options to commercialize these products in the future can be related
to: increasing constraints or limits to commercializing this type of concentrates (stated by smelters or regulators) and an increase in the Arsenic contents of
saleable products (as results of mining operations).

12.6 Mineral Reserves Statement

The conversion of Mineral Resources to mineral reserves has been completed in accordance with CFR 17, Part 229 (S-K 1300). The reserves are based on
open pit and underground operations. Appropriate modifying factors have been applied as previously discussed. The positive economics of the mineral
reserves have been confirmed by LoM production scheduling and cash flow modeling as discussed in sections Error! Reference source not found. and
Error! Reference source not found. of this report, respectively.

The reference point for the mineral reserve estimate is the point of delivery to the process plant. The Qualified Person Firm responsible for the estimate is SRK
consulting (Peru) SA.

In the QP’s opinion, the mineral reserves estimation is reasonable in the context of the available technical studies and information provided by Buenevantura.

Table 12-14 and Table 12-15 shows the El Brocal mineral reserves as of December 31st, 2021.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 146

Table 12-14:  El Brocal Underground Summary Mineral Reserve Statement as of December 31st, 2021

Copper Silver Gold Arsenic

Mining Confidence Tonnage
Grade
Grade
Grade
Grade

Method
category
(kt)

(% Cu)
(g/t Ag)
(g/t Au)
(% As)

R&P

Proven 35 1.18 31.35 0.69 0.38
Primary
Probable 13,918 1.24 21.83 1.00 0.40

Sub-total
13,953 1.24 21.85 1.00 0.40
Proven &
Probable
R&P

Probable 873 1.92 11.87 0.24 0.55
Pillar Recov
Sub-total
873 1.92 11.87 0.24 0.55
Proven &
Probable
R&P

Probable 751 1.72 17.74 0.72 0.57
Remanent
Sub-total
751 1.72 17.74 0.72 0.57
Proven &
Probable

SLS Probable 16,908 1.33 23.35 0.61 0.50

Sub-total
16,908 1.33 23.35 0.61 0.50
Proven &
Probable

TOTAL Proven 35 1.18 31.35 0.69 0.38

Probable 32,450 1.32 22.26 0.77 0.46

Total

& Probable 32,485 1.32 22.27 0.77 0.46
Proven

Source: SRK, 2021

(1) Underground reported mineral reserves tonnage, grades and contained metal correspond to the total underground mineral reserves. Buenaventura's
attributable portion of Mineral Resources and reserves is 61.00%
(2) The reference point for the mineral reserve estimate is the point of delivery to the process plant.
(3) Mineral reserves are current as of December 31st, 2021 and are reported using the mineral reserve definitions in S-K 1300. The Qualified Person Firm
responsible for the estimate is SRK Consulting (Peru) SA
(4) Key parameters used in mineral reserves estimate include:
(a) Average long-term prices of copper price of 8,000 US$/t, gold price of 1,600 US$/oz, silver price of 25.00 US$/oz, lead price of 2,286 US$/t, zinc price
of 2,385 US$/t
(b) Variable metallurgical recoveries are accounted for in the NSR calculations and defined according to recovery functions, that average 84% for copper,
35% for gold and 52% for silver
(c) Mineral reserves are reported above a marginal net smelter return cut-off of 37.49 US$/t for room & pillar primary stopes, 38.94 US$/t for pillar
recovery with cemented backfill, 38.76 US$/t for remanent ore recovery and 41.12 US$/t for sub level stoping mining methods.
(d) Underground ore is scheduled to be processed mainly in the Plant 1 (used to process Copper ore)
(5) Mineral reserves tonnage, grades and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 147

Table 12-15:  El Brocal Open Pit Summary Mineral Reserve Statement as of December 31st, 2021

Copper Silver Gold Lead Zinc Arsenic

Confidence Tonnage
Ore type Grade
Grade
Grade
Grade
Grade
Grade

category
(kt)

(% Cu)
(g/t Ag)
(g/t Au)
(% Pb)
(% Zn)
(% As)

Copper Ore Proven 2,288 2.35 96.48 0.01     0.21

Probable 24,059 1.64 15.56 0.24     0.43

Sub-total
26,347 1.70 22.59 0.22     0.41
Proven & Probable

Lead-Zinc Ore Proven 4,789   91.55   1.37 2.65 0.05

Probable 3,418   91.92   0.70 1.44 0.10

Sub-total
8,207   91.70   1.09 2.15 0.07
Proven & Probable
Source: SRK, 2021

(1) Open pit reported mineral reserves tonnage, grades and contained metal correspond to the total open pit mineral reserves. Buenaventura's attributable
portion of Mineral Resources and reserves is 61.00%
(2) The reference point for the mineral reserve estimate is the point of delivery to the process plant.
(3) Mineral reserves are current as of December 31st, 2021 and are reported using the mineral reserve definitions in S-K 1300. The Qualified Person Firm
responsible for the estimate is SRK Consulting (Peru) SA
(4) Key parameters used in mineral reserves estimate include:
(a) Average long-term prices of copper price of 8,000 US$/t, gold price of 1,600 US$/oz, silver price of 25.00 US$/oz, lead price of 2,286 US$/t, zinc
price of 2,385 US$/t
(b)
Variable metallurgical recoveries are accounted for in the NSR calculations and defined according to recovery functions, that average for
Plant 1 (Cu): 70% for copper, 24% for gold and 48% for silver

Plant 2 (Pb-Zn): 45% for lead, 54% for zinc and 63% for silver
(38% in lead concentrate and 25% in zinc concentrate)

(c) Mineral reserves are reported above an internal net smelter return cut-off of 27.14 US$/t for open pit ore sent to Plant 2 (PbZn) and 25.95 US$/t
for open pit ore sent to Plant 1 (Cu)
(e) Open pit ore is scheduled to be processed in the Plant 1 (Copper ore) and Plant 2 (Lead-Zinc ore)
(5) Mineral reserves tonnage, grades and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to
rounding
(6) Has not been generated total sum values. Both products do have not the same saleable and payable elements

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 148

13 Mining Methods

13.1 Parameters Relevant to Mine Designs and Plans

El Brocal is a polymetallic deposit with a mantiform geometry located in limestone and volcanic rocks; the ore minerals are chalcopyrite, enargite, argentiferous
galena, native silver, among others.

The following zoning can be distinguished in the mineralization (See Figure 13-1 and Figure 13-2):
● TYPE I, corresponding to a copper core: Cu + Au + Ag +/- Bi.  
● TYPE II, corresponding to a transition zone: Cu + Ag + Bi + Zn + Pb.  
● TYPE III, corresponding to a Base Metal zone: Zn + Pb +/- Ag.

Figure 13-1:  El Brocal deposit mineralization zoning

Source: BVN, 2021

El Brocal mining operations are developed at open pit and underground.  In turn, these are distributed in the following sectors:

i. Open pit operations:

1.Tajo Norte
2.Tajo Sur
ii. Underground operations
1.Marcapunta Norte
2.Marcapunta Centro
3.Marcapunta Sureste
4.Marcapunta Suroeste
5.Marcapunta Sur
SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 149

Figure 13-2:  Distribution of El Brocal mining operations

Source: BVN, 2021

The underground mining methods are Sub Level Stopping with cemented backfill and Room and Pillar with long holes. The pillars left in the ground are chain
pillars that run along the entire mining direction and cover the mantle’s extension.  

This method varies depending on the mining sector:

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 150

● North Sector: the stope is 8 m wide, 28 m high, and length varies between 50 to 100 m; the pillar width has been set at 6 m.
● South Sector, which includes the Southwest and Southeast Zone: the stope is 14 m wide, 28 m high, and the length varies between 50 and 100 m, with
a pillar width of 6 m.

Figure 13-3:  Underground mining scheme in El Brocal

Source: BVN, 2021.

The following design parameters have been considered for the open pit operation:

● Bench height: 6 m.
● Berm width: variable between 5 and 8 m.
● Ramp width: considering equipment width, safety distances, and safety berm, the open pit have ramp widths of 12 m with a 10% slope.
● Optimum turning radius according to the equipment fleet is 6.4 m.
● Minimum loading width considering the excavator and the minimum spaces to carry out operational activities is 20 m.   However, one excavator is
expected to work with two trucks.  As such, the estimated width can be up to 60 m.

Buenaventura has reported the Ore Reserves for El Brocal on the December 2021 in accordance with U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Sk-
1300. Ore reserves were estimated based on Mineral Resources (measure and indicated).  Table 13-1 shows the Cu-Ag ore reserves report by mining sector,
Table 13-2 shows the Pb-Zn ore reserves report by mining sector.
Table 13-1:  El Brocal Cu-Ag ore reserves report
Sector Ore Cu Ag Au As
Ore reserves category
Cu-Ag
ore (Mt)
(%)
(oz/t)
(g/t)
(%)

Tajo – Norte - Sur

Proven 2.29 2.35 3.10 0.01 0.21
Open Pit
Probable 24.06 1.64 0.50 0.24 0.43
Marcapunta Underground Proven 0.03 1.18 1.01 0.69 0.38
Probable 32.45 1.32 0.72 0.77 0.46
Ore reserves total 58.83 1.49 0.72 0.52 0.44

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 151

Source: BVN, December 2021.

Table 13-2:  El Brocal Pb-Zn ore reserves report

Sector Ore Pb Zn Ag

Ore reserves category
Pb-Zn ore (Mt)
(%)
(%)

(oz/t)
Tajo – Norte - Sur

Proven 4.79 1.37 2.65 2.94
Open Pit
Probable 3.42 0.70 1.44 2.96
Ore reserves total 8.21 1.09 2.15 2.95
Source: BVN, December 2021.

El Brocal has a 18,000 tonnes per day (tpd) ore production target for the period 2022 to 2032 distributed in:

● Underground mining production: 8,500 tpd (2022 – 2032).

● Open pit mining production: 9,500 tpd (2022 – 2032).

There are zones that restrict the scope of the open pit operation, the archaeological zone (southern  open pit) and the Colquijirca town (northern open pit).

13.1.1 Geotechnical

A) Open Pit
The recommendations for inter-ramp angles (IRA) presented in Figure 13-10 were developed by SRK in 2021 and detailed in the document "El Brocal Pit Slope
Design - Preliminary Results".  The design criteria used for IRA recommendations is a minimum Factor of Safety (FOS) of 1.4 for global slopes and 1.3 for
inter-ramp slopes in static conditions, while for pseudo-static conditions, a minimum of 1 was considered for global slope FOS.  The probability of failure at
bench level considered was <30% for 6 m high benches and the berm width was calculated using the Ritchie criterion.  The probability of failure at bench level
was determined with a kinematic analysis and the FOS for global slopes was based on a two-dimensional limit equilibrium analysis.  The recommended IRAs
constitute the maximum achievable angles to meet all design criteria.

Additionally, to evaluate the influence of existing underground excavations with the design of the overlying open pit, a three-dimensional model was built in RS3
where the annual open pit excavation was simulated to determine the vertical displacements in slopes considering the underground workings without backfill.
  Stability was evaluated using the stress reduction method in the south wall of the open pit with a section in RS2.  A FOS of 1.3 in static condition was
considered as acceptable for the global slope.  

The information reviewed includes the following:

● Structural and geomechanical logging of 6 oriented holes drilled in 2021; RamPeru S.  A.  C.; 2021.
● Optical and acoustic televiewer performed on 6 diamond drill holes in 2021; RamPeru S.  A.  C.; 2021
● Geomechanical logging and mapping - Report "Slope Stability Study of Tajo Norte-Smelter-Marcapunta"; DCR Ingenieros S.R.Ltda.; 2016.
● "Geomechanical mapping of the west slope of Colquijirca pit"; DCR Ingenieros S.R.Ltda.; 2020.
● Geomechanical logging of underground holes, RamPeru S.  A.  C.; 2019 and 2020.
● Geomechanical relogging and mapping field work; DCR Ingenieros S.R.Ltda.; 2020.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 152

● Geological mapping plans (CAD format: Lvl 3912, 3942, 3960, 3960, 3972, 3986, and 4172); Compañia de Minas Buenaventura; 2020.
● Interpreted water table - current condition (Superficie Condición Dic2020.dxf); AMPHOS 21 Consulting Perú S.A.C.; 2021
● El Brocal 2021 lithological and structural model; Compañia de Minas Buenaventura; 2021
● Open pit design; Compañia de Minas Buenaventura; 2020
● 3D topographic model of underground excavations; Compañia de Minas Buenaventura; 2020
● Historical laboratory tests performed for geomechanical reports; Various authors; 2008-2021.  Rock mechanics tests are summarized as follows:
o 22 tests for physical property determination
o 30 uniaxial compression tests
o 23 indirect tensile tests
o 61 triaxial compression tests
o 25 direct shear tests

Rock mass characterization

The 2021 lithological model was used as the basis for the characterization of rock mass in the open pit to define the limits and changes in the mechanical
behavior of materials found in the open pit.  See Figure 13-4.

Figure 13-4:  Lithological model 2021 projected in the design of the El Brocal open pit.
Source: BVN

The materials characterized for stability analysis are:

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 153

● In-situ soil
● Backfill material: Made up of old dumps in the area of influence of the open pit.
● Soft rock: Made up of rocks with an RQD less than 25 and which are close to the surface.  It is identified in the lithological model as upper Calera.
● Middle Calera (varved): It lies on the boundary between a rock mass and a soft material.  It is considered to have a GSI of 35 for stability analysis.
● Middle Calera (favorable)
● Lower Calera
● Transitional conglomerate
● Shuco conglomerate
● Mitu
● Pyroclastic deposit
● Porphyritic deposit

The properties of the materials used in the analyses were calculated from a combination of laboratory tests and statistical analysis of results from geotechnical
logging and surface and underground window mapping.   For soft materials - in-situ soil, backfill material, and soft rock - the properties calculated from the
report "Update of the Stability Study of Condorcayán DME, Tajo Norte", SRK, 2020, were used.   For the other materials, the Hoek and Brown's nonlinear
criterion was used.   The summary of properties can be found in Table 13-3 and Table 13-4.
Table 13-3:  Summary of soft material properties

Material Density (kg/m³) Cohesion (kPa) Friction angle (°)

Soft rock (upper Calera) 2400 103 22
In-situ soil 2100 5 25
Faults 2400 2 18
Source: BVN

Figure 13-5: Nonlinear failure envelope for backfill material

Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 154

Table 13-4:  Summary of rock mass properties

Density
Lithology 2021 GSI mb s a Erm (Gpa)
(g/cm³)
00_Porphyritic dacite 2.49 50 0.922 0.0039 0.506 3.3
00_Pyroclastic deposit 2.34 47 1.145 0.0028 0.507 2.0
00_Breccia 3.41 47 1.506 0.0028 0.507 13.7
20_Middle Calera(var) 2.57 35 0.864 0.0007 0.516 2.5
30_Middle Calera(fav) 2.77 42 1.310 0.0015 0.510 3.9
40_Lower Calera 2.24 47 3.766 0.0028 0.507 3.2
50_Transitional conglomerate 2.29 51 1.147 0.0043 0.505 7.9
60_Shuco conglomerate 2.38 53 3.919 0.0054 0.505 1.9
70_Mitu (*) 2.50 51 2.954 0.0043 0.505 4.1
Source: BVN

The shear strength of a rock mass is weaker along discontinuities or bedding planes, which are notorious in a sedimentary deposit like El Brocal.  The direction
of preferred planes of weakness is defined by the layering in sedimentary units (Calera units, Conglomerates, and Mitu) while in the igneous units (porphyritic
dacite, pyroclastic deposit, and breccias) the anisotropy is defined by the predominant families of discontinuities.  Anisotropic models in six structural domains
were used in the slope stability analyses (See Figure 13-7).

The main geological structures (Figure 13-6) identified in the project area are:
● East-dipping bedding
● North-South oriented faults (Huarau Faults)
● East-West oriented faults (Smelter, Centro, and Marcapunta Faults)

Figure 13-6: Main faults in the El Brocal structural model

Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 155

Figure 13-7:  Definition of structural domains in the El Brocal pit

Source: BVN

The families of discontinuities defined for each structural domain were used for the kinematic analysis where wedge, planar, and toppling failures were
identified.   The spatial variability of each discontinuity family in dip and dip direction was considered for the calculation of cumulative failure probability for
different bench angles in the six structural domains and the six delimited design sectors.  Bench angles between 60° to 75° were obtained as a result.

Design sectors were delimited considering lithological changes, pit wall orientation, and location of major faults.   For the pre-feasibility level analyzed, 5
associated sections were constructed for each design sector.  The outcropping of Bajo fault in sectors S4 and S7 may result in a large-scale planar instability
as it has the same dip direction as the designed slopes; this geometric configuration is analyzed in the limit equilibrium sections S4 and S7.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 156

Figure 13-8:  Design sectors for stability analysis of El Brocal pit

Source: BVN

The limit equilibrium analysis was developed in Slide, one section for each design sector shown in Figure 13-8. As of December 2020, an inferred water table
was used without considering the excavation from open pit to end wall. The depressurization of design sectors S2 and S4 is important in order to avoid water
contact with the Bajo fault backfill material which would cause a reduction in the mechanical properties of the structure outcropping on the walls of sectors S2,
S3, and S4.  To achieve the minimum FOS of 1.4 in sectors S2 and S4, the open pit bottom elevation has been raised to avoid fault outcrop on the pit wall. The
geometry of Bajo fault and the characteristics of the backfill material should be confirmed at the feasibility stage.

Figure 13-9:  Example of stability analysis.  Section S2 for the sector of the same name
Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 157

For each design sector, geometric configurations are recommended depending on the limits between soft materials (in-situ soil, backfill material, and upper
Calera) with decouplings of 12 meters at each change of material and a slope angle of 2H:1V in soft materials.  Bench height is 6 meters with maximum inter-
ramp height of 60 meters and elevated pit bottom for design sectors S4 and S7 (4085 and 4127 MASL respectively).

Figure 13-10 shows the design recommendations for six sectors delineated for the 2020 open pit design.

Figure 13-10:  Design recommendations for open pit design 2020

Source: BVN

Geotechnical risks in the El Brocal open pit

The geotechnical design of the El Brocal open pit presented in this report considers the stability analysis for the final walls at the end of the pit’s life of mine.
  The stability of the intermediate or operative slopes should be continuously verified by the Mine Planning Department of the El Brocal as the mining
progresses and it should incorporate the new geotechnical information collected during the excavation and exposition of the new pit walls.

Historically the El Brocal open pit has had wall instability issues in its West wall because, the orientation of the stratification has an unfavourable dip for the
overall stability.  This structural condition together with the presence of siltstones and the increase of the water table during the raining season (December to
March) are unfavourable for the slope stability.  SRK recommends

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 158

the evaluation of the phases stability in a tridimensional model that could incorporate the changes in the walls orientation and use a real time deformation
monitoring system (like radars) during the mining of the open pit.  The monitoring system should be under the supervision of the Geomechanics team in the
mine, so it can alert and evacuate all the operative personnel if a major slope failure occurs.

In the South-East wall of the existing tajo Norte, it is located an old waste dump deposit called the “botadero Sur”.  This waste dump is located very close to the
pit crest and will influence in the global stability of the SE wall as the open pit mining goes South.  The South waste dump could act as a water collector that
would affect the underlaying pit wall, to prevent that SRK recommends to push the waste dump South, away from the designed pit crest prior to the mine in that
wall so the risk of an slope failure due to the interaction of the waste dump and open pit is reduced significantly.

The underground workings that will interact with the open pit will not represent a global geotechnical stability risk, but the voids should be considered in the
local stability analysis.   It is highly likely that the old underground workings will have an impact in the open pit wall stability during the pit mining if the
underground openings are not well handled.  SRK recommends stablishing a void management plan that describes in detail the procedures to follow for the
early detection and dealing with voids when they intersect the open pit.

B) Pit - underground mine interaction analysis

To analyze the interaction between the underground mine and the open pit, a three-dimensional model in RS3 was used to simulate the annual mining
sequence of the open pit until 2034.  This assessment considered that the underground openings would have no backfill during the years of open pit mining.  

Figure 13-11 shows the impact on the open pit walls as mining progresses southward and approaches the underground excavations.   By 2034, a zone of
increased displacement (> 0.20m) is evident towards the center of the pit and another on the south wall of the open pit.  To determine if the voids produced by
the underground mine have an effect on the south wall stability, Section 6 was analyzed in RS2, and stress reduction was used to determine the FOS.  A SRF
of 1.71 was obtained showing that the wall is stable once the voids are filled.  See Figure 13-12.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 159

Figure 13-11:  Simulation of open pit mining to identify critical sectors

Source: BVN

Figure 13-12:  Section 6 - maximum shear isocontours under static conditions

Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 160

C) Underground Mine

El Brocal underground mine is located in the southern projection of the open pit between coordinates N 88009476 to 8806621 (WGS84).

Figure 13-13:  Projected 2020 reserves with open pit design

Source: BVN

Figure 13-14:  East view of 2020 reserves with open pit projection
Source: BVN

The mining methods to be applied by sector are defined in Table 13-5.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 161

Table 13-5:  Mining methods by sector

North Central Southwest Southeast Southwest South

Mining method
Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone 2 Zone

Room-and-pillar with
X X
long holes

Pillar recovery with

X X
cemented backfill

Sublevel stopping with

cemented backfill, with
X X
mining of primary and
secondary stopes
Source: BVN, 2021

Geotechnical database
Information reviewed for the underground mine geotechnical database includes the following:
● Structural and geomechanical logging of 1 oriented hole drilled in 2021; RamPeru S.  A.  C.; 2021.
● Optical and acoustic televiewer performed on 6 diamond drill holes in 2021; RamPeru S.  A.  C.; 2021
● Geomechanical logging and mapping - Report "Geomechanical Evaluation Report of the Marcapunta N, SW, and SE Underground Mining"; DCR
Ingenieros S.R.Ltda.; 2017.
● Geomechanical logging of underground holes, RamPeru S.  A.  C.; 2019 and 2020.
● Geomechanical relogging and mapping field work; DCR Ingenieros S.R.Ltda.; 2020.
● Geological mapping plans (CAD format: Lvl 3912, 3942, 3960, 3960, 3972, 3986, and 4172); Compañia de Minas Buenaventura; 2020.
● El Brocal 2021 lithological and structural model; Compañia de Minas Buenaventura; 2021
● 2020 Resources and Reserves Model; Compañia de Minas Buenaventura; 2020
● 3D topographic model of underground excavations; Compañia de Minas Buenaventura; 2020
● Historical laboratory tests performed for geomechanical reports; Various authors; 2008-2021.   Rock mechanics tests for all reserve zones are
summarized as:
o 15 tests for physical property determination
o 10 uniaxial compression tests
o 9 indirect tensile tests
o 13 triaxial compression tests
o 13 direct shear tests

Geomechanical characterization of rock mass

Underground mine characterization was divided based on geotechnical, geological, and geometrical information of the mineralized structure.  The underground
mine has been divided into five sectors for rock quality analysis, as shown in Figure 13-15.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 162

Table 13-6: RMR'76 statistics by geotechnical sectors, is divided into geotechnical sectors which in turn were subdivided based on the spatial location of the
drill hole or mapping with respect to the mineralized structure.  The zones identified are intermediate wall (IW), footwall (FW), close footwall (CFW), hanging
wall (HW), close hanging wall (CHW), and orebody (ORE).  The close hanging wall and footwall were considered for a distance of +/- 15 meters from the
mineralization.

Figure 13-15:  Geotechnical analysis sectors

Source: BVN

Table 13-6:  RMR’76 statistics by geotechnical sectors.

Sector Zone No. of samples Minimum Maximum Est. Dev. Average
1 FW 88 17 79 16.6 46.2
1 CFW 18 20 60 17.0 46
1 HW 66 23 68 9.9 48.3
1 CHW 10 21 63 10.6 53.3
1 ORE 37 17 65 10.6 50
2 FW 87 20 73 11.1 54.9
2 CFW 57 19 68 11.8 50.8
2 HW 159 22 74 13 52.7
2 CHW 25 33 75 8.7 56.9
2 ORE 158 19 75 12.1 54.5
3 IW 31 31 74 9.4 52.5
3 FW 409 21 73 11.3 54.2
3 CFW 81 26 73 10.8 53.3
3 HW 287 21 72 14.2 49.8
3 CHW 58 22 72 11.5 52.8
3 ORE 280 22 77 10.1 55.8
4 IW 9 58 72 4.1 63.3
4 FW 185 31 79 8.0 61.3
4 CFW 89 24 76 15.9 51.9
4 HW 383 17 74 13.2 49.7
4 CHW 48 37 76 8.4 61.6
4 ORE 176 33 75 7.8 59.4
5 IW 40 49 73 6.6 63.2
5 FW 288 28 77 7.4 63.6
5 CFW 107 29 75 11.8 56.9

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 163

Sector Zone No. of samples Minimum Maximum Est. Dev. Average

5 HW 440 16 77 12.9 57.5
5 CHW 110 16 72 12.2 57.8
5 ORE 405 26 77 8.1 61.5
Source: BVN

Structural domains
El Brocal mine has been divided into seven structural domains delimited by major faults (information provided by BVN).  See Figure 13-16   These domains
encompass both the surface and underground mine.

Figure 13-16: Structural domains defined for the El Brocal mine

Source: BVN

The predominant domains where 2020 reserves are located are domains 1, 5, 6, and 7; reserves in domain 1 are generally associated with the recovery of
pillars in old workings.

Major structures have a predominant NS and EW strike as shown in Figure 13-17, and minor structures follow that regional trend.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 164

Figure 13-17:  Major faults in the underground mine

Source: BVN

Geomechanical condition of the El Brocal underground mine

Currently, El Brocal mine uses the long-hole Sub Level Stopping mining method and detrital fill in the most unfavorable sectors.  Additionally, the height of
overburden varies from 80 to 400 m depth.  In the past, some sectors, located in the northeast sector of the mine, have been mined using the conventional
room and pillar method.  The following figure shows the current situation of El Brocal mine.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 165

Figure -13-18:  Plan view of El Brocal mine’s current mining area

Source: BVN

Stress analysis in the current mining area shows low induced stress magnitudes and evidence of significant relaxation zones due to underground mining.

Section G3, located in the southwest area of the mine, shows that stress s1 levels in rib pillars are in the order of 8 to 10 MPa and for stress s3 in the range of
<0 Mpa.  Also, stress levels in the stopes dome are between 0 and 2 Mpa for stress s1 and between 0 and 1 Mpa for stress s3.

Section G2, located in the southeast sector in the deepest zone of the mine, shows that stress s1 levels in the rib pillars are between 12 and 16 Mpa and stress
s3 is in the range of <0 Mpa.  Stress levels in the stopes dome are in the order of 0 to 2 Mpa for stress s1 and 0 to 1 Mpa for stress s3.

Section G5, located south of the current mining zone, shows that s1 stress levels in rib pillars are in the order of 8 to 12 Mpa and for stress s3 in the range of
<0 Mpa.  Also, the stress levels in the stopes dome are between 0 and 2 Mpa for stress s1 and for stress s3 they are in the order of <0 Mpa.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 166

Finally, section 7, located to the north of the mine, shows that stress s1 levels in rib pillars are in the range of 4 to 8 Mpa and for stress s3 is in the range of <0
Mpa.  Also, stress levels in the stopes dome are between 0 and 2 Mpa for stress s1 and for stress s3 they are in the order of <0 Mpa.

The comparison of stresses in rib pillars shows that most of the pillars are stable for the rock mass quality with GSI values of 50 to 65 (IIIa and II type rocks).
 Stress s3 values are close to 0, which would suggest that they are at the tensile limit and could cause the pillar to relax, so a shotcrete layer is applied when
pillars are adjacent to access roads.

Figure 13-19:  Rib pillar stresses vs.  rock type failure criteria
Source: BVN

The stability of mining stopes was also verified through a retro analysis using the graphical stability method to compare the results of scanner topography vs.
  the mining design.   ELOS values in the order of 0.2 to 0.5 m in the most unfavorable walls with N-S direction of the mining stopes were obtained.   The
following figure shows the ELOS values in two stopes verified in the southern zone of the El Brocal mine.

Figure 13-20:  Stability retro-analysis of El Brocal south area mining stopes

Source: BVN

Based on the assessments performed and on the history of subsidence in the northern area of El Brocal underground mine, we can deduce that backfilling, as
applied, contributes significantly to

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 167

stability control.  Additionally, the pillars and mining stopes are stable and benefit from the quality of the mass rock (Type II and III rock) and the predominant
structural conditions.

Geomechanical design of mining methods

El Brocal has decided to use the long-hole room and pillar mining method in the southeast and southwest zones adjacent to the current mining zone.  A pillar
recovery method with cemented backfill will be used throughout the current mining zone while a sublevel stopping method, with cemented backfill through the
mining of primary and secondary stopes, will be used in the southern zone of the mine.

The geomechanical design parameters for each of the mining methods are summarized below.

Long-hole room-and-pillar mining design

Mining area using the long-hole room and pillar method to be applied in geotechnical sectors 4 and 5, where the existing sublevel heights vary from 22.5 to 30
m from floor to roof and with sublevels with an approximate section of 4.5 x 4.5 m.  

Mining direction of stopes in both sectors are N-S and the mining scenarios identified are as follows:
● Longitudinal extension of rooms from north to south of a single sublevel.
● Mining of a second sublevel of the rooms.
● Partial recovery of rib pillars.

Table 13-7 and Table 13-8 show the maximum longitudinal room dimensions for different existing sublevel heights and predominant rock quality, considering an
equivalent linear overbreak/slough (ELOS) of 0.5 m and predominant rock quality ranges from RMR 50 to 60 (Fair rock type IIIa) and RMR >60 (Good rock
type II).
Table 13-7:  Dimension of stopes for ELOS=0.5 m and RMR > 60 (II)

Sublevel
Sector
Pit length (m) Maximum width (m) Mining Direction
height (m)
4 22.5 80 8 N-S
4 24.5 80 8 N-S
4 28.5 57 8 N-S
4 34.5 42 8 N-S
5 22.5 77 8 N-S
5 24.5 60 8 N-S
5 26.5 51 8 N-S
5 30 41 8 N-S
Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 168

Table 13-8:  Dimension of stopes for ELOS=0.5 m and RMR 50-60 (IIIa)

Sector Sublevel height (m) Pit length (m) Maximum width (m) Mining Direction

4 22.5 22 8 N-S
4 24.5 20 8 N-S
4 28.5 18 8 N-S
4 34.5 16 8 N-S
5 22.5 17 8 N-S
5 24.5 16 8 N-S
5 26.5 15 8 N-S
5 30 14 8 N-S
Source: BVN

The maximum span sizing in the roof of rooms of mining stopes in the Southwest sector - Geotechnical sector 4 and Southeast sector - Geotechnical sector 5,
were carried out according to the criteria of Rimas Pakalnis and Wang (2000), considering the predominant RMR of each zone.  The following table shows the
values of maximum span or width at the stopes dome based on the predominant rock quality of each zone.  
Table 13-9:  Maximum span (m) for stopes dome

Potentially unstable maximum width or

Sector Predominant Design RMR Stable maximum width or span (m)
span (m)

4 55 7 16
4 60 9 19
4 65 12 23
5 60 9 19
5 65 12 23
5 70 15 26
Source: BVN

Considerations for the control of pillar stability in mining stopes

Considering that most of the existing pillar widths are in the order of 5 to 6.5 m and in some sectors have widths of 9 to 15 m, it was estimated that the stability
level of narrow pillars (5 to 6.5 m) is currently critical and backfill will need to be used to guarantee their stability in future mining works.

An extension of the existing rooms in N-S strike will require the use of backfill (detrital or cemented) to maintain the recommended maximum hydraulic radius.

For the mining of a second sublevel, the first sublevel is required to be completely backfilled to confine the lower pillar, which may be cemented or uncemented.

Considerations for the support of mining stopes

In the southwest and southeast mining sectors, where the long-hole room and pillar method will be applied, the use of bolting cable support will be required in
the stopes dome considering that the

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 169

sublevels are expanded until reaching the mining stope width (8 m) and specifically in the areas with unfavorable rock quality (RMR < 60).   Here we
recommend implementing a standard of support for sublevels extended to stope width.

Sectors where partial pillar recovery is required due to unfavorable rock quality conditions, the roof may require reinforcement to ensure stability control.
 Additionally, the maximum potentially unstable width or span in the dome of pillar recovery zones should be controlled.  

Figure 13-21:  Typical support section in the long-hole room and pillar method
Source: BVN

Pillar recovery with cemented backfill

The pillar recovery mining area in the North and Central sector of the current mining area and below the projected open pit has sublevel heights between 12 to
22 m from floor to floor and sublevels with an approximate section of 4.5 x 4.5 m, where a N-S stope mining direction was applied.

The cemented backfill of primary stopes, prior to pillar recovery, was considered.   Also, it will be important to ensure the topping off of backfill towards the
dome or the construction of artificial shotcrete pillars to prevent the collapse of the roof or dome during pillar recovery.

The pillar cannot be mined in areas where primary stopes are already backfilled with detrital fill.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 170

Figure 13-22:  Profile view looking north of the north mining sector.
Source: BVN

Support of mining stopes with pillar recovery and cemented backfill

The cemented backfill of primary stopes should guarantee topping so as not to generate a span exceeding the rock mass capacity.   Some artificial pillar
construction options should be evaluated if necessary.

Drilling sublevels should be constructed and located without disturbing the stability of the pillar to be recovered.

A temporary pillar is required to be left in the left wall of the lower drilling sublevels to prevent the pillar from collapsing under its own weight.  Figure 13-23
below shows a typical scheme for pillar recovery.

Figure 13-23:  Typical mining section for rib pillar recovery with cemented backfill.
Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 171

Design of sublevel stoping with cemented backfill by mining primary and secondary stopes
Mining stopes dimensions for Southwest 2 and South sector - Geotechnical sector 1, 2 and 3, using the method of sublevel stoping with cemented backfill, by
mining primary and secondary stopes with the mining direction and length of the most unfavorable stope wall of N-S; assuming different sublevel heights of 18
to 30 m from floor to floor and an equivalent linear overbreak/slough (ELOS) of 0.5 m.
Dimensions may be applied according to the predominant RMR of each design sector.

● For Design Sector 1, the predominant RMR is between 30 and 70.

● For Design Sector 2, the predominant RMR is between 50 and 70.  RMR ranges from 40 to 50 in lesser incidence.
● For Design Sector 3, the predominant RMR is between 50 and 70.  RMR ranges from 40 to 50 in lesser incidence.

Table 13-10:  Dimension of stopes for ELOS=0.5 m, RMR > 60 (II)

Sector Sublevel height (m) Pit length (m) Maximum width (m) Mining Direction
1, 2, and 3 18 80 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 20 80 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 25 64 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 30 45 8 N-S
Source: BVN

Table 13-11:  Dimension of stopes for an ELOS=0.5 m, RMR 50 to 60 (IIIa)

Sector Sublevel height (m) Pit length (m) Maximum width (m) Mining Direction
1, 2, and 3 15 41 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 18 28 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 20 24 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 25 20 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 30 17 8 N-S
Source: BVN

Table 13-12:  Dimension of stopes for an ELOS=0.5 m, RMR 40 to 50 (IIIb)

Sector Sublevel height (m) Pit length (m) Maximum width (m) Mining Direction
1, 2, and 3 15 12 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 18 11 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 20 10 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 25 9 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 30 9 8 N-S
Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 172

Table 13-13:  Dimension of stopes for an ELOS=0.5 m, RMR 30 to 40 (IVa)

Sector Sublevel height (m) Pit length (m) Maximum width (m) Mining Direction

1, 2, and 3 15 10 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 18 9 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 20 9 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 25 8 8 N-S
1, 2, and 3 30 8 8 N-S
Source: BVN

Support of mining stopes in design sectors 1, 2, and 3

In the South and Southwest 2 mining sectors, where design sectors 1, 2, and 3 are located, and where the sublevel stoping method with cemented backfill will
be applied through the mining of primary and secondary stopes, the use of bolting cable support will be required in the dome of primary and secondary stopes,
mainly where rock quality is unfavorable.

Anchor lengths will be established based on stope width and rock mass quality.

Figure 13-24 shows a typical scheme of support installation in the stopes dome or roof.

Figure 13-24:  Typical support section in the dome of primary and secondary stopes
Source: BVN

Geotechnical characteristics of cemented mine backfill

Considering sublevel stoping with mining of primary and secondary stopes and rib pillar recovery with cemented backfill, the required backfill strength design
has been performed, by applying the

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 173

analytical criteria of Mitchell (1982), for a factor of safety of 1.5, sublevel heights of 18, 20, and 25 m, and stope lengths that may vary from 20 to 50 m.

If the requested strengths cannot be achieved, the secondary stope mining length can be reduced to reduce the exposure of wall lengths.

The use of detrital or hydraulic backfill is recommended as confinement in the sectors where rib pillar recovery is not planned, or when a second mining level is
desired.
Table 13-14:  Cemented backfill strength required for underground mining

Vertical stope height (m) Length of primary stope or exposed backfill wall (m) Required UCS strength (MPa)
18 20 0.42
20 20 0.44
25 20 0.47
18 30 0.54
20 30 0.57
25 30 0.62
18 50 0.69
20 50 0.73
25 50 0.83
Source: BVN

13.1.2 Hydrogelogical

The hydrogeological evaluation was carried out to evaluate the groundwater inflow to the North Pit, South Pit and the underground mine deepening according
to the mining plan provided by SMEB for the period 2021-2034 and to estimate pore pressures for stability analysis on pit walls.  For this, a hydrogeological
numerical model was developed using the Feflow 7.0 (DHI-WASY GmbH, 2018) software.   The model has been developed based on the conceptual
understanding of the sector that was established by integrating hydrological and geological information, gauges, piezometric levels and hydraulic tests.

The geology in the study area is made up of a sequence of sedimentary, volcanic and metamorphic rocks that were instructed by dacite domes and
freomagmatic breccias. These sedimentary rocks have been folded into three or more parallel anticlines, following an N-S direction. The Marcapunta Dioritic
Stock is associated with regional faults and brought mineralization in the open pit and underground mine sector. On the other hand, as more recent events are
the unconsolidated deposits (colluvial, moraines and alluvial) generally located at the bottom of valleys with limited thickness, although in some sectors they
present considerable thicknesses of up to 100 m. In general, The main groundwater flow occurs in the first 50 to 100 m depth of the bedrock, where is highly
fractured as a result of the folding of the layers associated with different tectonic events, and added to this the longitudinal faults such as They are, Fallas San
Cristobal fault, Andacacha fault, Lachipana fault, make these structures facilitate the movement of the underground flow, however at a greater depth the
movement of the underground flow would be limited to the permeability of the matrix and few interconnected fractures.

Current pit dewatering system consists of 02 well (12 inch diameter) and 01 collection pond at the bottom.  Currently, there is no instrumentation to quantify the
flows extracted from the bottom of

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 174

the pit.   However, the total flow is approximately estimated on 60 l/s.   The underground mine is located to the south of the pit.   Data provided by SMEB
indicates drainage flow is between 118 and 200 l/s.  This flow is managed through a pumping system inside the labors discharging through Marcapunta Norte
entrance..  (See Figure 13-25).

Figure 13-25:  Annual average estimates of pit and underground inflow

Source: Amphos

The project includes the expansion of the pit to the south of the mine (southern pit) and the underground expansion to the east and to the southwest.  Plans
exist to dispose of backfill in the northeast sector of the North pit, which will mean that the current pumping well will be inoperative.  This configuration has been
simulated with the calibrated hydrogeological models, which generates estimates of the new drainage requirements.  The results of these simulations indicate
that pit drainage flows will increase slightly to 66 l/s while underground mine drainage will reach maximum of 250 l/s, both cases as annual averages.  

Even if no substantial increments are expected in the future, a new pit dewatering system will be necessary in the sector between North Pit and South Pit.  This
new dewatering system will replace the one that will be destroyed by backfill disposal in the pit.  Additionally, given that the underground mine develops to
deepest levels, the mine drainage design needs to be updated.  

Preliminary, 04 new pumping wells is required in the middle zone (see Figure 13-26).  Exactly location and distribution need to be evaluated in Pit Dewatering
Evaluation.  This evaluation must include pumping tests and at least 08 new piezometer to support the interpretation of tests.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 175

Figure 13-26:  Proposed pit dewatering sector

Source: Amphos

It is important to point out that the underground mine is in a massif rock with low hydraulic conductivity (permeability) conditions that allow a focused cone
depression.

The geochemical behavior of some specific components has been evaluated through the results of two different geochemical campaigns (Golder, 2010 and
Amphos 21, 2019). The specific components under evaluation are the current open pit and underground mine (Tajo Norte and Marcapunta Norte, respectively),
a future additional open pit mine (Tajo Sur) and the Tajo Norte fill. A total of 81 samples taken from waste rock dumps and exploratory wells were analyzed.
However, only some of the tests had other tests in addition to ABA and pulp pH, and only two moisture test cells have been performed, which is clearly not
sufficient to evaluate the behavior of the 4 components to be evaluated. Despite the need to strengthen geochemical studies, some conclusions can be drawn
from existing results.  

The carbonate content of the samples is variable, although many samples have a high carbonate content. This is expected due to the dominant lithologies
(limestones and dolomites). This can result in a high neutralization potential for these rocks. Despite this carbonate content, there are

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 176

some low carbonate, high sulfur lithologies, which can result in short-term acid drainage. Furthermore, rocks with a high neutralization potential could not
develop this potential, since the oxidation of sulfides can promote the precipitation of oxides on carbonate surfaces, inhibiting the neutralization of acids. Based
on this and available water quality data, it is expected pH values between 4 and 6 with exceedances in some parameters (i.e. iron, copper, manganese, lead
and zinc), therefore, treatment is required.  

Finally, the number of samples and the tests carried out, although they are sufficient to determine the geochemical behavior in general, would not be totally
conclusive to determine the specific behavior in each of the project components. For this reason, it is recommended to reinforce the geochemical studies with
complementary samplings that allow reducing the gap of uncertain behavior that some of the results show in the antecedents. These recommendations are
associated with a battery of tests that involves, Acid-base Accounting (ABA), Total Rock Chemical Analysis (WRA), Mineralogy, Short-term leaching by shake
flask extraction (SFE) and long-term humidity cell leaching (HTC). The number of samples are related with total material to extract and must be evaluated;
however, this number could be between 20 and 50 samples.

13.2 Production Rates, Expected Mine Life, Mining Unit Dimensions, and Mining Dilution and Recovery
Factors
El Brocal’s open pit (OP) and underground (UG) operations, has as a general production target 18,000 tpd of ore.  Based on this, the life of the mine (LOM)
has been estimated at 11 years (2022 to 2033).

13.2.1 Open Pit

13.2.2 Production schedule/phases

El Brocal’s open pit operations has as a production target 9,500 tpd of ore.  Based on this, the LOM has been estimated at 10 years (2022 to 2032) exploiting
26.22 Mt Cu ore (1.67% Cu, 0.71 oz/t Ag y 0.22 g/t Au) and 8.69 Mt Pb/Zn ore (1.06% Pb, 2.13% Zn y 2.85 oz/t Ag).  See Table 13-15 and Table 13-16.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. May, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 177

Table 13-15:  Tajo Sur (Cu-Ag ore) open pit mining plan

Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total

OP treated Cu ore
(Mt) 0.47 0.51 1.28 2.23 3.34 3.34 3.34 3.34 3.34 2.93 2.23 26.38
Cu (%) 1.71 2.37 2.63 1.67 1.63 1.69 1.74 1.77 1.39 1.57 1.64 1.70
Ag (oz/t) 2.31 2.84 2.97 1.69 0.43 0.73 0.37 0.33 0.24 0.37 0.43 0.73
Au (g/t) 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.21 0.09 0.38 0.35 0.28 0.23 0.25 0.22
As (%) 0.12 0.12 0.23 0.31 0.47 0.40 0.53 0.52 0.34 0.41 0.44 0.41
Fe (%) 8.08 8.94 10.83 12.16 12.25 11.14 11.43 8.25 10.13 10.95 11.88 10.84
Cu recovery (%) 70.0 83.0 84.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 65.0 66.0 67.0 70.2
Ag recovery (%) 55.0 56.0 57.0 50.0 40.0 45.0 40.0 40.0 30.0 40.0 40.0 47.6
Au recovery (%) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 22.0 22.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 23.5
As recovery (%) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 68.0 69.0 70.0 71.0
Cu recovered fines
(kt) 5.6 10.0 28.3 26.1 38.2 39.6 40.7 41.4 30.2 30.3 24.6 315.1
Ag recovered fines
(Moz) 0.6 0.8 2.2 1.9 0.6 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 9.1
Au recovered fines
(koz) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 5.0 2.1 9.8 9.0 7.2 5.2 4.2 43.6
Source: El Brocal, December 2021.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 178

Table 13-16:  Tajo Norte & Tajo Sur (Pb-Zn ore) open pit mining plan

Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total

OP treated Pb/Zn ore (Mt) 2.10 2.89 2.00 0.76 - - - - - 0.46 0.21 8.41
Pb (%) 0.96 1.00 1.52 0.95 - - - - - 0.76 0.34 1.08
Zn (%) 1.65 1.79 2.81 3.02 - - - - - 1.98 2.43 2.13
Ag (oz/t) 2.84 2.73 3.06 3.67 - - - - - 2.66 3.07 2.92
Fe (%) 7.81 7.55 13.39 12.11 - - - - - 9.00 11.12 9.58
Cu (%) 0.23 0.19 0.35 0.27 - - - - - 0.17 0.16 0.24
Pb recovery (%)
35.5 47.7 50.3 46.8 - - - - - 8.7 37.6 45.4
Ag-Pb recovery (%) 39.4 38.7 39.1 39.0 - - - - - 30.5 30.6 38.4
Zn recovery (%) 51.4 53.3 56.2 56.7 - - - - - 53.7 55.7 54.4
Ag-Zn recovery (%) 32.9 32.4 31.4 33.8 - - - - - 32.6 33.1 32.5
Pb recovered fines (kt) 7.1 13.8 15.4 3.4 - - - - - 1.4 0.3 41.3
Zn recovered fines (kt) 7.8 27.5 31.7 13.0 - - - - - 4.9 2.8 97.6

Ag recovered fines (Moz) 4.3 5.6 4.3 2.0 - - - - - 0.8 0.4 17.4
Source: El Brocal, December 2021.

Note: Open pit LOM plan considers the ore from: the total ore reserves Cu and Pb/Zn (34.55 Mt ore) and the ore stock of the open pit as of December 31, 2021 (0.24 Mt ore). The total of ore reserves to be treated
is 34.79 Mt

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 179

13.2.3 Project life

Based on the estimated reserves as of December 2021, the project life is expected to run until 2032.

13.2.4 Mining unit dimensions (dimensions of benches and berms)

The following design parameters have been considered for the open pit operation:
● Bench height: 6 m.
● Berm width: variable between 5 and 8 m.
● Ramp width: considering equipment width, safety distances, and safety berm, the ramp width is 12 m with a 10% slope.

Figure 13-27:  Design parameters (bench, berm, y ramp)

Source: El Brocal, December 2021.

● Optimum turning radius according to the equipment fleet is 6.4 m.

Figure 13-28:  Optimum turning radius

Source: El Brocal, December 2021.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 180

● Minimum loading width considering the excavator and the minimum spaces to carry out operational activities is 20.   However, one excavator is
expected to work with two trucks.  As such, the estimated width can be up to 60 m.

Figure 13-29: Loading wide area

Source: El Brocal, December 2021.

Mining dilution
Mining dilution refers to waste or low-grade rocks that are not separated from the ore during the mining process.  In other words, they are unwanted rocks that
are mixed with the ore and are sent to the processing plant, resulting in increased operating costs, reduced ore value, distortion of production schedules,
among other consequences.

There are two approaches to the calculation of dilution:

Dilution(insitu) = Waste rock tonnes * 100……………………………………..(1)
Ore tonnes

Dilution(mill feed) = Waste rock tonnes * 100………………………..(2)

(Ore tonnes+Waste rock tonnes)

In El Brocal’s open pit, dilution was estimated based on the block model under an insitu dilution perspective (1), and based on the contour or wall of the
envelope generated by the blocks that meet the following conditions:

● NSR (Net Smelter Return) value of the block greater than or equal to the internal NSR Cutoff Value.
● Block category: measured or indicated.

Based on the contour or wall of the envelope and according to the number of exposed faces in the horizontal XY plane, dilution was applied according to the
values shown in Table 13-7.
Table 13-17:  Insitu dilution values
Number of exposed sides per block (X Y plane) Dilution in situ
1 10%
2 21%
3 32%
4 44%
Source: SRK, June 2021

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 181

Figure 13-30 shows the dilution application criterion on the contour or wall of the envelope in the horizontal XY plane generated under the indicated conditions.

Figure 13-30:  Ore envelope and dilution application criterion.

Source: SRK, June 2021.

Mine recovery
An ore loss of 2% has been considered for El Brocal open pit operations, i.e., an ore recovery of 98%.  This value is based on open pit operations of similar
production levels and the same type of deposit.  

13.2.5 Underground Mine

Production Schedule
El Brocal’s underground operations has as a production target 8,500 tpd of ore.   Based on this, the LOM has been estimated at 11 years (2022 to 2033)
exploiting 35.74 Mt Cu ore (1.27% Cu, 0.70 oz/t Ag y 0.74 g/t Au).  See Table 13-18.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 182

Table 13-18:  Marcapunta (Cu-Ag ore) underground mining plan

Description 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total

UG treated Cu ore (Mt) 2.94 3.01 3.07 3.22 2.80 2.80 2.81 2.80 2.80 2.80 3.43 32.48
Cu (%) 1.64 1.49 1.29 1.37 1.26 1.23 1.23 1.14 1.31 1.33 1.20 1.32
Ag (oz/t) 0.59 0.63 0.72 0.73 0.72 0.52 0.54 0.79 0.71 1.05 0.85 0.72
Au (g/t) 0.46 0.71 0.59 0.68 0.57 0.81 0.89 1.14 0.86 1.02 0.79 0.77
As (%) 0.51 0.50 0.43 0.48 0.48 0.47 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.47 0.44 0.46
Fe (%) 16.38 16.33 17.86 18.16 23.15 24.35 21.49 22.11 19.36 19.88 17.10 19.53
Cu recovery (%) 85.2 85.0 83.0 84.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 82.0 84.0 84.0 84.0 83.8
Ag recovery (%) 51.0 51.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 50.0 50.0 52.0 52.0 55.0 54.0 52.2
Au recovery (%) 30.7 35.0 34.0 35.0 34.0 35.0 36.0 37.0 36.0 37.0 35.0 35.3
As recovery (%) 88.2 88.0 86.0 87.0 86.0 86.0 86.0 85.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 86.7
Cu recovered fines (kt) 41.1 38.3 32.8 37.2 29.3 28.6 28.6 26.1 30.8 31.3 34.6 358.6
Ag recovered fines (Moz) 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.6 1.6 12.1
Au recovered fines (koz) 13.3 24.2 19.7 24.5 17.5 25.4 28.8 37.8 27.9 33.8 30.7 283.7

Source: BVN, December 2021.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 183

Project life
Based on the estimated reserves as of December 2021, the project life is expected to run until 2033.

Mining unit dimensions (stope dimensions)

The underground mining methods are Sub Level Stopping with cemented back fill and Room and Pillar with long holes.  The pillars left in the ground are chain
pillars that run along the entire mining direction and cover the mantle’s extension.  
This method varies depending on the mining area:

- North Zone: the stope is 8 m wide, 28 m high, with length varying between 50 to 100 m, and the pillar width has been set at 6 m.

- South Zone includes the southwest and southeast zones: the stope is 14 m wide, 28 m high, length varying from 50 to 100 m, and the pillar is 6 m wide.

Mining dilution
The applied dilution varies between 4% to 5% according to the mine method, and this has been configured in the mining software for the definition of ore
reserves stopes.
In general, given the type of deposit are mainly mantle, a 4% dilution has been considered for cleaning and backfilling.

Mine recovery
An ore loss of 5% has been considered for El Brocal underground operations, i.e., an ore recovery of 95%, and this has been configured in the mining software
for the definition of ore reserves stopes.  This value is based on underground operations of similar production levels and the same type of deposit.

13.3 Requirements for Stripping, Underground Development, and Backfilling

13.3.1 Open Pit

Stripping ratio
Mining phases established for the open pit are 16, distributed between Tajo Norte and Tajo S.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 184

Figure 13-31:  Sequence of mining phases

Source: El Brocal, December 2021.

The stripping ratio (SR) varies according to the mining phase, on average 11 t of waste must be removed to extract 1 t of ore.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 185

Table 13-19:  Stripping ratio report by phase

Phase 09 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Total

Ore (Mt) 0.24 0.85 3.95 0.00 0.53 1.40 1.80 0.23 0.58 1.70 0.43 4.14 4.80 4.55 3.92 5.44 34.55

Pb (%) 1.00 0.76 0.79 0.00 1.37 0.98 0.82 0.88 0.51 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.26

Zn (%) 3.28 2.91 0.85 0.00 3.56 1.69 1.33 2.07 1.27 1.05 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.18 0.02 0.08 0.51

Ag (oz/t) 0.28 2.73 2.99 0.00 0.95 3.37 3.24 1.84 3.96 2.45 0.58 0.41 0.32 0.92 0.30 0.44 1.25

Cu (%) 0.00 0.15 0.44 0.00 0.08 1.13 1.20 0.04 0.88 1.02 1.78 1.59 1.62 1.59 1.66 1.48 1.30

Au (g/t) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.22 0.33 0.07 0.37 0.27 0.17

Waste
3.32 2.03 13.79 19.59 7.26 9.64 11.82 11.29 21.86 22.77 13.31 38.30 19.90 21.69 55.09 106.28 377.94
(Mt)

SR 14.0 2.4 3.5 0.0 13.6 6.9 6.6 49.1 37.6 13.4 31.0 9.3 4.1 4.8 14.0 19.6 10.9

Source: BVN, December 2021.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 186

Water Drainage
El Brocal has designed a drainage plan for the management of contact and non-contact waters, with emphasis on improving mining and
discharge fronts, since in the months of November to April there is evidence of the presence of rainwater (runoff superficial), in addition to a
considerable groundwater recharge and subsurface seepage.
For this, an open pit drainage system was designed and implemented, installing a battery of production wells, to pump groundwater and
depress the water table or piezometric level to improve exploitation conditions and comply with the mining plan.
The infrastructure installed in the open pit for the management of rainwater and groundwater recharge is detailed below.

A. System from catchment and driving from the waters from rain or surface runoff
Taking into consideration the hydrological analysis and the historical level of the flows, gutters have been designed and built-in material "In
Situ" along the ore and waste material hauling routes to control and capture the surface runoff or rainwater.
Throughout the development of the open pit, the following types of gutters have been implemented:

A.1 Typical gutter on the haul ramps

Triangular section gutters have been built on the hauling ramps, located at the foot of the slope and in some cases on both sides of the
accesses.  Table 13-20 shows the characteristics of the triangular section gutter.

Table 13-20:  Characteristic of the triangular section gutter

Internal
Slope
Gutter Depth H(m) Foundation Base external (m) Total Basis (m) Slope Internal (V:H)
external (V:H)
(m)
CU-1 0.8 0.8 0.4 1.2 1:1.25 1:0.5
Source: BVN, January 2022.

Figure 13-32:  Detail of triangular gutter design

Source: El Brocal

The gutters are built during the dry season or when the rains are absent (May - October); during the rainy season (November – April) the
infrastructure maintenance is permanent due to clogging of the gutters.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 187

Figure 13-33 shows the location of access roads to the Tajo Norte and part of the Tajo Sur.

Figure 13-33:  Location from the gutters with priority in the haul roads
Source: El Brocal

A.2 Typical gutter on the sidewalks

- Wall Norte the open pit – Phase 9E

In this sector in banks 4285, 4294, 4303 and 4312 coated gutters will be built, due to being on the projection of a
geotechnical fault, with in order to prevent runoff water from infiltrating and percolating in the banks lower and generate a
saturation condition.  The Figure 13-34 shows application scheme.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 188

Figure 13-34: Section typical on sidewalks

Source: El Brocal

- Gutter design on the north wall of open pit

The design of gutters projected in this sector has been estimated considering the hydrological analysis and the design flow.
 The typical section selected for this type of hydraulic infrastructure is trapezoidal way.  This gutter has been coated with 1.5
mm HDPE geomembrane. Table 13-21 details the characteristics of the section, the Figure 13-35 shows the typical section.

Table 13-21:  Details the characteristics of the section

Structure Dimensions Finals (m) Pending Coating Ability(l/s)

Edge
Base Height Slope Free minimum

Gutter 0.4 0.5 01:01 0.1 0.20% Geomembrane 1.5 mm 80

Source: El Brocal

Figure 13-35: Detail of trapezoidal gutter design

Source: El Brocal

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 189

The Figure 13-36 shows the gutters coated with geomembrane on the north side of the open pit.

Figure 13-36: Gutters coated with geomembrane on the north side of the open pit
Source: El Brocal

● Gutters on Condorcayan dump

● In the east, west and north zones of the Condorcayan dump there are perimeter gutters, coated with 1.5mm thick geomembrane, of
approximately 3,360m. Figure 13-37 shows the location of the gutters.

Figure 13-37: Location of the gutters on Condorcayan dump

Source: El Brocal

● Gutters on South dump

● Figure 13-38 shows the waterproofing gutter with 1.5 mm geomembrane on the perimeter of the South dump, which carries the
waters to an uptake station and through an HDPE

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 190

pipe (8 "diameter) to lead them to the pique Lumbreras. Figure 13-39 shows the location of the perimeter and coronation channels in
the area of direct influence of the South dump.

Figure 13-38: View the waterproofing gutter on the perimeter of the South dump
Source: El Brocal

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 191

Figure 13-39: Location of the perimetral and crowning gutter of the South dump
Source: El Brocal

B Current infrastructure for pumping groundwater in the open pit

Groundwater are a problem of operational productivity and a potential security risk in open pit and underground mining. The presence and
pressure of groundwater in geological discontinuities adversely affects the safety and geometric configuration of bench height and slope
angles of the open pit.

To depress the water or piezometric level, it is necessary to reduce the pressure of groundwater in its vicinity, as well as a groundwater
management plan in order to dimension and install the pumping system according to local and regional potential recharge of groundwater.

B.1 Production wells (Open pit drainage)

In order to improve drain conditions of the open pit in 2016, 5 tubular wells (14 "diameter) were drilled, located at levels 4162 and 4169 of
150 m deep on average. In 2019, 2 tubular wells (12 "diameter) were drilled, with the aim of keeping the water level in equilibrium, located in
the northern zone of the open pit, one on the east side and the other on the west side, at level 4158 (122m) and 4175 (130m) respectively.

The PCN 07 well has a flow average from exploitation of 42.0 l/s. The groundwater pumping is conducted through HDPE pipes (8”
diameters), which discharge at the Poza Metropolitano pumping station. Figure 13-40 shows the location of drainage wells.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 192

Figure 13-40: Location of drainage wells on the open pit

Source: El Brocal

B.2 Pumping equipment in the open pit

Table 13-22 shows the characteristics of the pumping equipment installed in each drain well.

Table 13-22:  Characteristics of the pumping equipment in the open pit

Data the Motor Data from the Bomb
Water well
Brand Model No. from Serie Power Voltage Brand Model Number ofstages Diameterfrom Pressure Flow(l/s)
Download

10INCH-200HP- 200 hp (150

PCN - 7 SME 1302DP3263 460 v National Pump SH10HC-3 03 stages 8" 145 42
2P kW)

Source: El Brocal

C Stations installed in the open pit

C.1 “El Metropolitano” pumping station

Storage and water pumping station of surface runoff waters (rain) and water filtrations coming from the Condorcayan dump, located in
northeast of the open pit, at level 4294. This infrastructure has two "ships"; one to decant the sediments and the other for water storage.
Approximately their capabilities are of 1,100 m³ and 3,200 m³ respectively. See Figure 13-41.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 193

Figure 13-41:  “El Metropolitano” water storage and pumping station, level 4294
Source: El Brocal

C.2 “Bottom of the Open Pit” pumping station

Located at the bottom of the open pit on the north side (4150 level), built on "in-situ" material, which captures surface runoff waters (rain) and
groundwater filtrations coming from the South Gallery and the East Gallery. See Figure 13-42.
The location of the station is temporary, as it is based on the mining and discharge plan short, medium, and long term.

Figure 13-42: Poza on the bottom of the open pit, temporarily located at level 4150
Source: El Brocal

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 194

C.3 “Poza la Llave” pumping station

Located at level 4250 with a storage capacity of 2,500 m³. Poza has a coating and waterproofing of geotextile and geomembrane. See
Figure 13-43.
The pumping station receives the waters of South Poza and then pumped to the industrial water treatment plant.

Figure 13-43: "Poza la Llave" pumping station, located at level 4250

Source: El Brocal

13.3.2 Underground

Explorations, Developments, and Preparations

The activities carried out in the design and mining process at the Marcapunta Norte underground mine are detailed below.

Explorations
Crossings and windows with a 4.5 x 4.5 section are built, whose main objective is to generate diamond drilling chambers.   The typical
section is the same as that of the main accesses because these are later used to start development work.

Developments
Mine development is carried out according to a specific objective, so we have:
● Negative-positive ramp (section 4.5 x 4.5).  Access ramp to the lower gallery that will serve for the mobilization of personnel and
equipment, as well as for the extraction of broken ore.
● Pumping Chambers (section 4.0 x 4.0).  Chamber with a negative slope of 15%, located in the lower gallery, will serve to capture
the water generated by drilling and filtration.
● Accumulation and loading chambers (section 4.0 x 4.5).   Chambers located in the lower gallery, which will serve for the
accumulation and loading of the broken ore.
● Shelters (section 2.0 x 2.5).  Cameras located in the ramps and galleries, which serve as a pedestrian shelter and for an electrical
panel, which must be properly marked.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 195

● Ventilation and services chimney (section 3.0 Ø).  The chimney is located according to the design of each block, the objective
being to guarantee the entry of clean air, the exit of stale air, and the entry of services (water, air, energy).

● RB (section 4.0 Ø).  These are works that communicate with the surface and are located at the ends of each zone or sector, the
lengths range from 200 m to 350 m.  being able to be greater as the mine deepens.

Preparations
● Upper main galleries (Section 4.0 x 4.5).   Its objective is to prepare the mineralized block from the upper part, from these the
upper sublevels will be executed, leaving continuous pillars.  Throughout the mining process it will serve as access to personnel,
equipment, and services.

● Lower main galleries (Section 4.0 x 4.5).  Its objective is to prepare the mineralized block from the lower part.  From these, the
lower sublevels will be executed, leaving continuous pillars.  It will serve as access to personnel, services, and equipment.  Here the
cleaning and loading of ore will be carried out.

● Upper and lower secondary gallery (Section 3.9 x 3.7).  Its objective is to carry out drilling and blasting, the ore cleaning will be
carried out in the lower part.

● Shelters (section 2.0 x 2.5).  Chambers located in the secondary galleries, spaced every 15 meters.

● Slot (section 4.0 x 4.0).  Tillage generally located at the end of the secondary galleries, from these the VCR chimney is made, and
opening of the slot trench.  

● VCR Chimney (section 2.1 x 2.1).  The VCR or Slot will be located at the end of the pit where the exploitation will begin.  Once the
VCR chimney has been completed, the slot trench will be expanded to continue with the production lines.

Construction general scheme of underground mine

The following graphs show the general scheme of distribution of the underground mine, for the mining of the primary and secondary stopes.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 196

Figure 13-44:  3D view of the scheme of sublevel stoping mining method with continuous pillars
Source: BVN

Figure 13-45:  Plan view of the scheme of sublevel stoping mining method with continuous pillars
Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 197

Figure 13-46:  Profile view of the scheme of sublevel stoping mining method with continuous pillars.
Source: BVN

Figure 13-47: Profile view of the scheme of sublevel stoping mining method with continuous pillars, leaving a bridge pillar in the
areas where it has been mined with chambers and pillars in the upper part.
Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 198

Figure 13-48:  Profile view of the scheme of the sublevel stoping mining method with continuous pillars, leaving shield pillars so
as not to affect the main extraction access galleries.
Source: BVN

Mine backfill
Currently, there is no system in place for the generation and distribution of "cemented backfill".

The waste rock generated in the development and preparation work is used as "detrital fill" for the primary pits mined to improve the stability
of openings and to avoid incurring costs for transporting waste rock to the dumps.   The detrital fill is moved and distributed using
scooptrams.

Figure 13-49:  Profile view of the scheme detrital fill

Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 199

13.4 Required Mining Equipment Fleet and Machinery

13.4.1 Open pit mining equipment

The main equipment for operation, auxiliary services, and electric power is listed in the following tables:
Table 13-23:  San Martin contractor company’s equipments
Equipment Capacity Quantity (units)
Lube trucks - 1
Front end loader 4 m3 1
Water tank 5000 Gal 2
Fuel tank 5000 Gal 3
Crawler excavator 5.6 m3 7
  4.6 m3 2
  1.8 m3 1
Hydraulic hammer - 1
Backhoe 1 m3 1
Motor grader 3.7m x 0.61m 1
  4.2 m x 0.63m 2
Crawler-mounted rotary drill rig 5 - 9 inch 4
Compacting roller 9.5 t 1
  - 1
Tractor 10 m3 4
  5.6 m3 2
Grand total   34
DUMP TRUCK 24.5 m3 58
  20 m3 5
Grand total   63

Source: El Brocal

Table 13-24:  Smelter contractor company’s equipments

Equipment Brand Model Capacity Quantity (units)
Crawler excavator Caterpillar 336 1.8 m3 1
Crawler excavator Caterpillar 390 5.6 m3 1
Front end loader Caterpillar 966H 4 m3 1
Dump truck Mercedes Benz Actros 20 m3 12
Grand total       15
Source: El Brocal

Table 13-25:  Ecosarc contractor company' equipments

Equipment Brand Model Capacity Quantity (units)
Crawler excavator Caterpillar 336 CAT 1.8 m3 1
Backhoe - 420 F2 1 m3 1
Grand total       2
Source: El Brocal

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 200

13.4.2 Underground mining equipment

The underground mine is operated by specialized contractors:

● Empresa Comunal de Servicios Múltiples Smelter S.A.: ore and waste rock haulage, road maintenance.
● JRC Ingeniería y Construcción S.A.C.: advances, production, auxiliary services, support.
The main equipment for operation, auxiliary services, and electric power is listed in the following table:
Table 13-26:  Underground mining equipment

Equipment Brand Model Capacity Type Quantity

Scoop 6.0 yd3 Sandvik LH410 6.0 YD3 Diesel 9
Scoop 6.0 yd3 Cat R1600H 6.0 YD3 Diesel 1
Scoop 6.0 yd3 Sandvik LH410 6.0 YD4 Diesel 4
Scoop 6.0 yd3 Cat R1600H 6.0 YD3 Diesel 2
Scoop 6.0 yd3 Cat R1600G 6.0 YD3 Diesel 1
Jumbo Atlas 2 Arm Atlas RB282 16 FEET Electric 5
Bolter Resemin BOLTER 99   Electric 1
Bolter Atlas BOLTEC 235   Electric 2
Bolter Sandvik DS310   Electric 2
Simba S7D 64mm Atlas S7D   Electric 3
Simba S7D 89mm Atlas H1254   Electric 2
Simba S7D 64mm Epiroc S7D   Electric 1
Simba S7D 89mm Resemin RAPTOR 55-2R   Electric 1
Scaler (Pauss) Paus 853-S8   Diesel 5
Utility Telehandler Manitou MTX1030ST   Diesel 4
Utility Telehandler Manitou MTX1033S MINING   Diesel 2
Robotic Shotcrete Equipment Putzmeister SPM 4210   Diesel 2
Robotic Shotcrete Equipment Normet ALPHA 20   Diesel 2
Mixer (Concrete Mixer) Putzmeister MIXKRET 4   Diesel 1
Mixer (Concrete Mixer) Normet TORNADO S2   Diesel 6
30,000 CFM fan Airtec       40
32,000 CFM fan Airtec       1
60,000 CFM fan Airtec       9
Grand total         106
Trucks Mercedes benz ACTROS 3344 K 15 m3 Diesel 25
Grand total         25
Source: El Brocal

13.5 Final Mine Outline Map

13.5.1 General arrangement open pit and underground mining component

Figure 13-50 shows the final disposition of the main components of open pit and underground mining operations.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 201

Figure 13-50:  Disposition of the main components of open pit and underground mining operations
Source: El Brocal

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 202

13.5.2 Isometric and longitudinal plans

Figure 13-51 show a longitudinal view of open pit and underground mining operations.

Figure 13-51:  Longitudinal view of open pit and underground mining operations
Source: SRK, December 2021.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 203

14 Recovery Methods
El Brocal operates two independent conventional flotation plants, namely Plant 1 and Plant 2.   Plant 1 processes copper ore from
Marcapunta mine to recover copper minerals in order to produce copper concentrate.  Plant 2 processes lead and zinc ores from, mostly
from the Tajo Norte mine, to recover lead and zinc minerals with the purposes of producing lead concentrate and zinc concentrate (see
Figure 14-1).

Figure 14-1:  El Brocal, Fresh Ore Destination and Final Products
Source: SRK

14.1 Plant 1 - Copper Ore

Plant 1 is a conventional concentration plant producing copper concentrate that is transported offsite by dump trucks, and to a lesser extent,
rail cars, for sale to third parties.  The plant’s unit processes include crushing, grinding, flotation, and thickening.  Final tails are thickened
and disposed of in a conventional tailings storage facility.  Final concentrate generated in the flotation stage is thickened, then dewatered
before being sent to Callao Port.   A simplified block flow diagram of Plant 1 is shown in Figure 14-2 and the detailed flowsheet is shown in
Figure 14-3.  

14.1.1 Ore Delivery

Ore mined from the open pit and underground works is re-handled multiple times before being delivered to the mill facilities.   More
specifically, at the mining face ore is loaded onto approximately 30-tonne dump trucks, then delivered to an intermediate stockpiling area
where it is classified according to grade criteria; it is then reloaded prior to being sent to the mill feed stockpile.  It is SRK’s understanding
that this multiple rehandling is a consequence of agreements between El Brocal and   local communities.  These agreements include the
hiring of local companies to provide all trucking and loading equipment.   These unnecessary ore re-handling is likely translating into
additional operating expenditures for El Brocal.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 204

14.1.2 Plant 1 – Crushing Stage

Dump trucks deliver fresh ore to a coarse ore bin, which has a capacity of 100 tonnes and is equipped with a rock breaker as well as a
stationary 20” opening grizzly.  The grizzly’s passing size directly feeds a 47” x 33” jaw crusher operating with a 4” close side setting.  The
crusher discharge is conveyed to a primary 8’ x 20’ double-deck classification vibrating screen whose passing ½” stream becomes the final
product from the crushing plant that is conveyed to a stockpile.  The coarse stream from the primary screen feeds a secondary closed-circuit
crushing-classification stage consisting of a secondary cone crusher operating with a close-side setting of 47 mm and a secondary double-
deck vibrating screen with a ½” passing size.  A fraction of the secondary vibrating screen’s coarse stream feeds a tertiary cone crusher
operating in open circuit with a close-side setting of 13mm.  Alternatively, the secondary screen’s coarse fraction feeds a second tertiary
cone crusher with a close-side setting of 10mm operating in open circuit.  Product from both tertiary cone crushers becomes final product
from the crushing plant that is conveyed to the stockpile.

The crushing plant’s final product sizing approximately P80= ½” is stored on two covered stockpiles of 6,000 tonnes and 2,000 tonnes each.

14.1.3 Plant 1 – Grinding & Classification

The grinding and classification stage consists of primary grinding in an open circuit followed by a classification stage, where hydrocyclones
feed the coarse fraction to a secondary grinding stage that operates in a close-circuit with a multi-deck vibrating screen.  

A fine ore reclaim system feeds the primary grinding stage, which consists of a 7” x 12” and 550 HP single rod mill operating in open circuit.
 The rod mill product feeds a hydrocyclone classification stage.  The hydrocyclone’s coarse fraction feeds the secondary ball mill consisting
of a 16.5” x 23’ and 400 HP ball mill.   Ball mill discharge along with hydrocyclones fines stream feeds six multi-deck (5 decks) vibrating
screens.  The screen’s passing (fine fraction) fraction becomes final grinding product and feeds the flotation stage.  The screen’s coarse
fraction is returned to the ball mill.

14.1.4 Plant 1 – Flotation & Regrinding

The grinding product sizing approximately P80=xx mm feeds a mechanically agitated 20’ diameter x 20’ long conditioning tank that overflows
onto the rougher flotation stage consisting of three mechanically agitated forced air cells.   The first rougher concentrate becomes final
copper concentrate stream that is pumped to the copper concentrate thickener.

The first rougher tails feed and inverse regrinding and classification stage using a 13.5’ x 22.6’ and 2750 hp ball mill and a cluster of
hycrocyclones.  The hydrocyclone’s fines stream feeds a multi-stage rougher 1 (2 cells) and rougher 2 (2 cells), followed by a scavenger
flotation circuit of 5 flotation cells.  Both rougher 1 and rougher 2 concentrates feed the cleaning flotation stage.  Rougher-scavenger’s tails
become final tails that are sent to the tails thickener.

Rougher concentrate feeds the first cleaning stage consisting of six DR-180 cells; its concentrate stream feed the second cleaning stage and
its tails are recirculated to the regrinding stage.  The second cleaning stage uses six DR-300 cells, its concentrate stream becomes final
copper concentrate, and its tails feed the cleaning-scavenger stage consisting of six DR-300 cells.  The

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 205

cleaning-scavenger stage’s concentrate stream is recirculated back to the second cleaner feed, and its tails are recirculated back to the
rougher 1 stage.

14.1.5 Plant 1 – Concentrate Thickening & Filtration

Final copper concentrate feeds a 60’ diameter x 10’ high thickener; solid discharge is dewatered in a 2m x 2m x 23 plates press filter to
produce a final copper concentrate with an approximate moisture of 12% w/w that is ready for trucking off site.

14.1.6 Plant 1 – Final Tails

The tails stream discharged from the flotation circuit is transferred to a 45’ diameter x 6 meter high thickener.  The thickener’s discharge is
transferred to a conventional tailings storage facility named Represa Huachuacaja.  No water is reclaimed from either the final tails thickener
nor  from the tailings storage facility.

Figure 14-2:  Simplified Block Flow Diagram, Plant 1

Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 206

Figure 14-3:  El Brocal, Plant 1 Flowsheet

Source: BVN

14.1.7 Plant 1, Operational Performance

El Brocal’s Plant 1 operational results for the 2017 to 2020 period are shown by month in Table 14-1.   Note that in the last four years,
Concentrate 2 was produced for only a limited number of months during the second half of both 2018 and 2019.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 207

Table 14-1:  Plant 1 – Copper Ore 2017 – 2020 Monthly Production Results
Period Fresh Feed Copper Concentrate 1 Copper Concentrat

Con
Grade Grade Grade
Ore, Grade Grade Grade Grade Concentrate Mass Grade Grade Grade Grade Recovery Recovery Recovery Recovery Recovery Concentrate Cu Grade Grade Grade Grade Re
Ag CuOx Ag
tonnes Cu% As% Fe% Au g/t 1 tonnes pull Cu% As% Fe% Au g/t Ag Cu As Fe Au 2 tonnes 02 Cu% As% Fe% Au g/t Cu
oz/t % oz/t
Ratio

2017 1 222,063 0.62 1.7% 0.5% 15.4% 0.42 0.1% 13,734 6.2% 6.1 25.4% 8.4% 18.9% 3.30 61% 93% 94% 8% 49%
2 179,216 0.68 2.1% 0.7% 17.2% 0.52 0.1% 13,410 7.5% 5.2 25.9% 8.7% 18.8% 3.63 57% 93% 94% 8% 52%
3 208,145 0.58 1.9% 0.6% 17.7% 0.66 0.1% 15,021 7.2% 4.7 25.0% 8.3% 19.4% 4.77 58% 94% 95% 8% 52%
4 154,718 0.65 2.0% 0.6% 17.2% 0.64 0.1% 11,142 7.2% 5.3 25.9% 8.5% 19.1% 4.66 59% 94% 94% 8% 53%
5 212,089 0.60 1.9% 0.6% 14.8% 0.55 0.1% 14,958 7.1% 5.4 25.5% 8.5% 18.9% 3.90 64% 94% 95% 9% 50%
6 192,964 0.65 1.9% 0.6% 14.7% 0.56 0.1% 13,865 7.2% 5.9 25.1% 8.3% 18.0% 3.97 65% 94% 95% 9% 51%
7 222,662 0.63 1.9% 0.6% 15.3% 0.58 0.1% 15,488 7.0% 6.1 26.1% 8.6% 16.8% 4.21 67% 94% 95% 8% 51%
8 218,412 0.60 1.9% 0.6% 15.1% 0.56 0.1% 14,802 6.8% 5.8 26.5% 8.6% 16.8% 4.02 65% 93% 95% 8% 49%
9 222,259 0.63 1.9% 0.6% 15.7% 0.49 0.1% 15,240 6.9% 6.3 25.7% 8.3% 18.5% 3.55 68% 93% 95% 8% 50%
10 212,680 0.82 1.9% 0.6% 16.2% 0.56 0.1% 14,126 6.6% 7.9 26.9% 8.8% 17.5% 4.04 64% 94% 94% 7% 48%
11 234,838 0.79 1.9% 0.6% 15.5% 0.55 0.1% 16,736 7.1% 7.3 25.1% 8.2% 18.0% 3.58 66% 93% 95% 8% 47%
12 244,355 0.69 1.9% 0.6% 15.0% 0.63 0.1% 16,272 6.7% 6.3 26.3% 8.6% 17.1% 4.57 61% 92% 93% 8% 48%
2018 1 206,875 0.61 1.9% 0.6% 14.8% 0.78 0.1% 13,932 6.7% 5.3 26.0% 8.6% 17.6% 5.68 59% 93% 94% 8% 49%
2 212,169 0.53 1.6% 0.5% 15.8% 0.65 0.1% 12,326 5.8% 5.5 25.4% 8.4% 17.5% 5.31 61% 92% 93% 6% 48%
3 246,212 0.64 1.7% 0.6% 15.9% 0.67 0.1% 14,552 5.9% 6.6 27.2% 9.0% 15.7% 5.08 61% 92% 93% 6% 45%
4 208,675 1.10 1.6% 0.5% 14.9% 0.58 0.1% 12,327 5.9% 12.4 24.9% 8.1% 17.4% 3.94 67% 92% 93% 7% 40%
5 225,391 0.87 1.8% 0.6% 16.5% 0.79 0.1% 14,114 6.3% 8.9 26.5% 8.7% 17.3% 4.93 65% 91% 92% 7% 39%
6 244,751 0.71 1.6% 0.5% 15.8% 0.53 0.1% 13,873 5.7% 7.9 25.1% 8.2% 17.7% 3.78 63% 91% 91% 6% 41% 4,168 1.7% 24.9% 8.3% 17.6% 4.04
7 242,593 0.68 1.6% 0.5% 16.3% 0.36 0.1% 14,042 5.8% 7.0 25.7% 8.4% 18.2% 2.70 60% 90% 92% 6% 44% 2,966 1.2% 25.7% 8.5% 16.3% 3.37
8 270,977 0.75 1.6% 0.5% 16.7% 0.41 0.1% 15,357 5.7% 7.5 25.5% 8.4% 18.6% 3.00 57% 90% 91% 6% 41%
9 261,284 0.75 1.6% 0.5% 16.1% 0.42 0.1% 15,792 6.0% 7.7 24.7% 8.1% 18.5% 2.75 62% 91% 91% 7% 40% 2,947 1.1% 24.9% 8.1% 17.3% 2.72
10 241,651 0.69 1.6% 0.5% 15.7% 0.38 0.1% 13,476 5.6% 8.2 25.8% 8.5% 16.6% 2.46 66% 91% 91% 6% 36% 221 0.1% 35.3% 11.5% 9.9% 3.85
11 196,771 0.76 1.7% 0.5% 16.0% 0.40 0.1% 11,547 5.9% 8.7 25.9% 8.5% 17.3% 2.79 66% 92% 92% 6% 41% 5,625 2.9% 24.8% 8.1% 19.6% 2.46
12 242,485 0.59 1.7% 0.5% 16.8% 0.45 0.1% 14,344 5.9% 5.9 25.5% 8.4% 17.3% 2.83 59% 90% 91% 6% 37% 4,052 1.7% 23.3% 7.3% 19.5% 3.20
2019 1 256,990 0.66 1.5% 0.5% 16.9% 0.40 13,565 5.3% 7.2 25.8% 8.5% 17.2% 2.71 57% 91% 91% 5% 36% 225 0.1% 19.9% 6.6% 22.4% 3.83
2 219,636 0.69 1.5% 0.5% 17.5% 0.42 12,586 5.7% 6.4 24.5% 8.0% 19.2% 2.39 53% 91% 92% 6% 33%
3 215,542 0.76 1.5% 0.5% 18.3% 0.62 11,642 5.4% 7.2 25.9% 8.6% 17.8% 3.93 51% 91% 92% 5% 34%
4 206,417 1.07 1.7% 0.6% 17.8% 0.51 12,929 6.3% 11.2 24.9% 8.2% 20.1% 3.14 66% 91% 91% 7% 38%
5 213,374 0.66 1.6% 0.5% 16.9% 0.42 11,912 5.6% 6.8 26.0% 8.6% 19.1% 3.01 58% 91% 91% 6% 40%
6 232,276 0.60 1.7% 0.6% 16.7% 0.50 14,056 6.1% 5.7 25.9% 8.5% 19.0% 3.17 57% 92% 92% 7% 38%
7 216,681 0.95 2.0% 0.7% 17.5% 0.59 15,975 7.4% 8.3 25.1% 8.3% 19.6% 3.54 65% 93% 93% 8% 44% 4,473 2.1% 24.4% 8.1% 17.8% 3.17
8 200,241 0.74 1.9% 0.6% 19.2% 0.56 14,074 7.0% 6.2 25.2% 8.4% 19.5% 3.50 59% 91% 92% 7% 44% 340 0.2% 26.3% 8.7% 15.6% 3.30
9 195,160 1.00 1.8% 0.6% 19.4% 0.65 13,367 6.8% 8.7 23.8% 7.9% 21.0% 3.57 60% 88% 89% 7% 37% 4,700 2.4% 26.2% 8.7% 17.3% 3.44
10 218,498 0.58 1.6% 0.5% 20.5% 0.54 12,975 5.9% 5.5 24.8% 8.1% 20.0% 3.49 56% 90% 91% 6% 38% 4,390 2.0% 26.0% 8.5% 17.4% 3.40
11 218,714 0.68 1.7% 0.6% 21.2% 0.67 14,796 6.8% 5.7 24.1% 8.0% 20.1% 3.78 56% 93% 94% 6% 38%
12 202,997 0.73 1.7% 0.6% 20.0% 0.57 12,430 6.1% 7.2 25.6% 8.5% 18.5% 4.00 60% 92% 93% 6% 43% 4,211 2.1% 23.6% 7.8% 20.3% 3.59

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 208

Period Fresh Feed Copper Concentrate 1 Copper Concentr

Con
Grade Grade Grade
Ore, Grade Grade Grade Grade Concentrate Mass Grade Grade Grade Grade Recovery Recovery Recovery Recovery Recovery Concentrate Cu Grade Grade Grade Grade R
Ag CuOx Ag
tonnes Cu% As% Fe% Au g/t 1 tonnes pull Cu% As% Fe% Au g/t Ag Cu As Fe Au 2 tonnes 02 Cu% As% Fe% Au g/t C
oz/t % oz/t
Ratio
2020 1 210,436 0.75 1.8% 0.6% 19.2% 0.62 0.1% 13,856 6.6% 6.6 25.0% 8.3% 19.0% 3.36 58% 92% 92% 7% 36%
2 179,842 0.61 1.9% 0.6% 16.8% 0.58 0.1% 12,382 6.9% 5.3 25.8% 8.5% 19.1% 3.82 60% 92% 92% 8% 46%
3 115,475 0.75 2.2% 0.7% 16.6% 0.52 0.1% 8,874 7.7% 6.2 26.2% 8.6% 18.4% 3.07 63% 93% 94% 9% 45%
4
5
6 167,692 0.72 2.1% 0.7% 17.2% 0.52 0.1% 12,201 7.3% 5.7 26.1% 8.7% 17.6% 2.85 58% 90% 90% 7% 40%
7 168,791 0.64 1.9% 0.6% 17.1% 0.41 0.1% 12,161 7.2% 5.1 23.6% 7.8% 20.3% 2.44 58% 90% 91% 9% 43%
8 168,457 0.61 1.9% 0.6% 15.3% 0.55 0.1% 10,842 6.4% 5.1 26.5% 8.8% 16.2% 3.32 54% 90% 91% 7% 39%
9 190,207 0.85 1.9% 0.6% 15.6% 0.51 0.1% 13,164 6.9% 6.8 25.2% 8.3% 17.9% 2.80 55% 92% 93% 8% 38%
10 198,951 0.87 2.1% 0.7% 19.0% 0.59 0.1% 15,411 7.7% 6.2 24.4% 8.1% 20.0% 2.94 55% 90% 92% 8% 38%
11 117,044 0.81 2.0% 0.7% 18.0% 0.65 0.1% 8,852 7.6% 5.5 24.2% 8.1% 20.9% 3.19 52% 90% 92% 9% 37%
12
Total 9,437,657 0.72 1.8% 0.6% 16.8% 0.54 0.00 608,527 6.4% 6.8 25.5% 8.4% 18.3% 3.6 60.4% 91.8% 92.5% 7.1% 42.6%
Sum 270,977 1.1 2.2% 0.7% 21.2% 0.79 0.14% 16,736 7.7% 12.4 27.2% 9.0% 21.0% 5.68 68.3% 94.4% 95.1% 9.0% 52.5%
Max 115,475 0.5 1.5% 0.5% 14.7% 0.36 0.06% 8,852 5.3% 4.7 23.6% 7.8% 15.7% 2.39 51.2% 88.4% 89.2% 5.2% 32.8%
Min 209,726 0.7 1.8% 0.6% 16.8% 0.55 0.09% 13,523 6.5% 6.7 25.5% 8.4% 18.4% 3.59 60.3% 91.8% 92.6% 7.2% 42.7%
Median 212,680 0.7 1.8% 0.6% 16.7% 0.55 0.09% 13,856 6.6% 6.3 25.5% 8.4% 18.5% 3.54 59.8% 91.6% 92.2% 7.1% 41.2%

Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 209

The monthly average and median for ore throughput are similar at approximately 210,000 tonnes; this is equivalent to 7,000 tonnes/day
when assuming 30 days per month.  In 2017-2020 minimum and maximum ore throughput show a wide variation at 3,800 tonnes/day
and 9,000 tonnes /day respectively, or roughly +29% and -45% of the overall average.
An analysis of throughput versus grinding P80 as seen in Figure 14-4, Figure 14-5, and Table 14-2 suggest some issues and a high
degree of operational instability as follows:

· Over the period in question, the P80 has ranged widely between 111µm and 399µm.   This is an unusually large range that
strongly suggests issues at the process control level.  It is highly unlikely that a mill can efficiently run within such a wide P80
range.

· At any given P80, the possible throughput covers an unusually large range.  For example, the operational statistics show that at
P80=150µm the throughput could range between 894 tonnes/day and 8,490 tonnes/day, which is the equivalent of a relative
109% variability with regards to the overall average of 7,000 tonnes/day previously mentioned.  Similar analysis can be done for
every other P80 as shown in Table 14-2.

· Throughput and grinding P80 over the 2017 to 2020 period (see Figure 14-5) shows that beginning in July 2019 (approximately),
the grinding P80 values appear to repeat (or are identical) for multiple consecutive days at a time, which is highly unusual for any
processing plant.

In SRK’s experience, a large variability in fresh feed (ore throughput) typically has a negative impact on plant’s performance, which is
included but not limited to the following:

· Poor grinding efficiency and consequently, an increase in steel consumption for steel balls, ball mill liners as well as accelerated
wearing in the classification systems, including slurry pumps.

· Instability in the flotation feed stream, which leads to low-quality concentrate and undesirable deportment of metals because
cross-contamination of minerals.

· Incurring in unnecessary operating expenditures in the way maintenance labor and spare parts.

· Additionally, low grade concentrate translates into commercial terms that fall below the industry benchmark and imply
unnecessary handling costs when using trucks and/or ocean shipping.

SRK is of the opinion that it is in El Brocal’s best interests to systematically review its operating practices starting from the ore supply and
continuing downstream until reaching concentrate commercial terms.   The characterization of the ore supply is required by plant
operators to select/apply a suitable set of parameters for that particular ore.  Defining a plant’s feed by its head grade only is usually a
perfect recipe for a poor metallurgical and cost performance.
Table 14-2: Plant 1, Throughput Variability as Function of Grinding P80

Plant 1 – Throughput, tonnes/day

P80 Min Max Relative variability @7000/td

130 3,028 -57% 7,831 12% 69%
140 4,345 -38% 8,053 15% 53%
150 894 -87% 8,490 21% 109%
160 1,487 -79% 8,410 20% 99%

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 210

Plant 1 – Throughput, tonnes/day

P80 Min Max Relative variability @7000/td
170 7,203 3% 9,308 33% 30%
180 5,839 -17% 8,481 21% 38%
190 3,133, -55% 8,813 26% 81%
200 7,124 2% 8,704 24% 23%
210 7,548 8% 8,817 26% 18%
220 7,204 3% 9,250 32% 29%
230 7,132 2% 9,628 38% 36%
240 6,181 -12% 9,617 37% 49%
Source: BVN

Figure 14-4: Plant 1, Ore Throughput v/s Grinding P80

Source: BVN

Figure 14-5:  Plant 1, Ore Throughput and Grinding P80 v/s time
Source: BVN
An analysis of throughput versus recovery, see Figure 14-6 A/B, suggest that Plant 1’s capacity limit could be approximately 220,000
tonnes/month or 7,300 tonnes/day, which is the value where metals’ recovery to copper concentrate starts trending down.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 211

Figure 14-6:  Recovery to Concentrate v/s Ore Throughput, Monthly and Daily Basis
Source: BVN

In terms of head grades, Plant 1’s daily copper average shows significant variability from one day to the next, see Figure 14-7.   It is
SRK’s experience that the daily variability observed is a reflection of a much larger hourly variability, which leads to instability at the plant
level that negatively impacts all key performance indicators of a processing facility.   The indicators affected may include but are not
limited to: higher than necessary expenditure, lower recovery, lower concentrate grade, and undesirable deportment of metals.

Figure 14-7:  Head Grade Variability 2018 to 2020

Source: BVN

In terms of Concentrate 1 production, average and median monthly production values are similar and in the range of 13,500
tonnes/month to 13,800 tonnes/month, which is equivalent to between 450 tonnes/day to 460 tonnes/day (approximately) of concentrate
production when assuming 30 operating days per month.   In 2017-2020, minimum and maximum concentrate production values also
reported significant variations at 295 tonnes/day and 558 tonnes/day respectively, which is equivalent to roughly +24% and 35% of the
overall average.   The equivalent concentrate mass-pull averages 6.45% over the period, and shows a good correlation coefficient
(R2=0.91) with ore’s copper head grade as seen in Figure 14-8.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 212

Figure 14-8:  Concentrate 1 Production versus Copper Head Grade

Source: BVN

In terms of recovery, copper’s monthly values ranged from a minimum of 88.4% to a maximum of 94.4% with a weighted average of
91.8%; the equivalent values for arsenic reached 89.2%, 95.1% and 92.6%; in the case of silver: 51.2%, 68.3% and 60.3%; and for gold:
32.8%, 52.5%, and 42.7%.
Copper Concentrate 1 reached typical commercial values in terms of copper grade but the arsenic grade was unusually high (because of
Enargite mineralogy).  This is probably limits El Brocal’s ability to sell in the open markets and forces it to deal with concentrate Traders,
which typically buy concentrates after levying significant penalties.  SRK requested but was denied of the necessary  detailed information
to properly support the metallurgical parameters required to estimate Reserves & Resources.  It is SRK’s opinion that the high content of
deleterious elements may translate into a material loss of value for El Brocal’s concentrate.  As such, the current estimates of the blocks’
value may not accurately represent future economics.

14.2 Plant 2, Lead and Zinc Ore

Plant 2 is a conventional, sequential multi-stage concentrator that produces lead and zinc concentrates that are trucked offsite to be sold
to third parties.  The plant’s unit processes include crushing, washing, grinding, and flotation.  Final tails are thickened and disposed of in
a conventional tailings storage facility.  Final concentrates are thickened and dewatered before being trucked off site.  A simplified block
flow diagram of Plant 2 is shown in Figure 14-9 and the detailed flowsheet is shown in Figure 14-10.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 213

Figure 14-9:  El Brocal, Plant 2 Simplified Block Flow Diagram

Source: BVN

Figure 14-10:  El Brocal, Plant 2 Detailed Flowsheet

Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 214

14.2.1 Plant 2 – Crushing, Washing & Classification Stage

Dump trucks deliver material to a coarse ore bin of 300 tonnes capacity equipped with a rock breaker and a stationary grizzly.   The
grizzly’s passing size directly feeds a roller crusher with 536 hp.  The crusher discharge is conveyed to a washing stage consisting of a
rotary washing trommel of 3.6 m diameter and 12 m long that discharges onto two doubledeck 10’ x 24’ banana screens operating in
series (primary and secondary).  Oversize from the primary banana screen feeds a secondary crushing stage operating in open circuit
and consisting of a 500 tonnes capacity hopper feeding two parallel gyratory crushers.  Discharge from the secondary crushers joins the
oversize from the secondary banana screen to feed a tertiary crushing stage consisting of a 400 tonnes hopper feeding a high pressure
grinding rolls unit (HPGR).   Discharge from the HPGR feeds a single 15’ x 26’ banana screen whose passing stream become final
product from the crushing plant that is conveyed to a fines stockpile (overall coarse fraction).   The coarse stream from the tertiary
banana screen is recirculated back to the tertiary crushing stage.  

Passing stream from the secondary banana screen feeds a Four-stage classification plant.  The first stage consist of a single primary
hydrocyclone whose underflow feeds the secondary classification stage using a multi-deck high frequency vibrating screen.  The fines
fraction from the primary and secondary stage feed the tertiary stage consisting of 22 hydrocylones.  Overflow stream (fines) from the
tertiary stage feed the quaternary stage consisting of 16 hydrocyclones.  The coarse stream from the secondary stage feeds the fines
stockpile.  The underflow stream from the tertiary stage feeds primary grinding stage.  The underflow from the quaternary stage feeds
the fines flotation plant.  The overflow stream from the quaternary stage feed a 20 m diameter clarifier whose discharge is split between
the fines flotation plants and the ultrafines flotation plant.

14.2.2 Plant 2 – Grinding and Flotation, Coarse Fraction

The coarse fraction from the washing, crushing and classification stage are stored in a 50,000 tonnes capacity stock pile.   Ore is
reclaimed from the stockpile using a front-end loader to feed a hopper that subsequenlty feeds the primary grinding stage.  The primary
grinding stage consists of two ball mills operating in parallel; the first unit is a 9.5’ x 14’ and 600 kW and the second unit is a 20’ x 30’ and
6500 kW.  Both ball mills operate in close-circuit with 10 units of a high frequency multi-deck vibrating screen. The passing stream from
the classification screens feeds the conditioning tank to the flotation stage.

The 24’ x 24’ conditioning tank receives slurry from the primary grinding stage and feeds the lead rougher flotation cells 1 to 5; its
concentrate is transferred to the lead cleaner flotation head tank, and its tails feed a closed-circuit regrinding-classification stage
consisting of a 16’ x 22’ and 2800 kW ball mill and 24 x hydrocylones.   Overflow stream from the hydrocyclones feeds the rougher
flotation cells 6 to 9, whose concentrate feeds the lead cleaner flotation head tank.  The concentrate stream from the lead cleaner cells
becomes final lead concentrate stream, and its tails stream is recirculated back to rougher cells 1 to 5.   Tails from rougher cells 6 to 9
become fresh feed to the zinc flotation circuit.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 215

14.2.3 Plant 2 – Lead Concentrate Thickening & Filtration

The final concentrate stream from the lead flotation circuit is received in a 40’ diameter x 10’ high thickener.  Solids discharged from the
thickener feed a 2m x 2m and 29 plates filter press.  The filtered concentrate is discharged onto a lead concentrate stockpile waiting to
be trucked offsite.

A sedimentation pond receives the thickener overflow; its solids are harvested on a regular basis and its clear water overflow is
transferred to the tailings storage facility along with tails from the fines flotation circuit and ultrafines flotation circuit.

14.2.4 Plant 2 – Zinc Flotation Circuit

Tails discharged from the lead rougher flotation cells 6 to 9 become fresh feed for the zinc flotation circuit.   The feed is received in a 24’
x 24’ zinc conditioning tank, whose overflow feeds the two rougher flotation banks operating in series with a total of 9 rougher cells.  
Tails from the zinc rougher cells become final tails, which are transferred to the tails thickener.  Concentrate from the zinc rougher cells
feeds an inverse regrinding and classification close-circuit consisting of a 9.5’ x 12’ and 520 kW ball mill and hydrocyclones.  Overflow
from the hydrocyclones feeds the cleaner flotation cells.   Concentrate stream from the cleaner flotation cells becomes final zinc
concentrate while tails from the cleaner cells are recirculated back to the zinc circuit conditioning head tank.

14.2.5 Plant 2 – Zinc Concentrate Thickening & Filtration

Final concentrate stream from the zinc flotation circuit is received in an 80’ diameter x 15’ high thickener.   Solids discharged from the
thickener feed a 2m x 2m and 55 plates filter press.   The filtered concentrate is discharged onto a lead concentrate stockpile waiting to
be trucked offsite.

A sedimentation pond receives the thickener overflow; its solids are harvested on a regular basis and its clear water overflow is
transferred to the tailings storage facility along with tails from the fines flotation circuit and ultrafines flotation circuit.

14.2.6 Plant 2 – Flotation, Fines Fraction

The underflow stream from the quaternary classification stage, along with a fraction of the ultrafines from the washing plant thickener,
feed a 15’ diameter x 16.5’ high conditioning tank.  The conditioning tank’s overflow feeds four DR-300 rougher flotation cells, whose tails
feed three 15’ diameter x 16.5’ high zinc conditioning tanks.   Overflow from the zinc conditioning tanks feed a rougher flotation bank of
12 DR-100 flotation cells, whose tails become final tails that are transferred to tailings storage facility while its concentrate stream is
transferred to the zinc cleaner flotation cells bank.  Concentrate from the cleaner cells becomes final concentrate that is pumped to the
zinc concentrate thickener, and its tails are recirculated back to the zinc rougher flotation DR-300 cells.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 216

14.2.7 Plant 2 – Flotation, Ultrafines Fraction

A fraction of the washing plant thickener underflow stream feeds two 10’ x 10 conditioning tanks.  The conditioning tank’s overflow feeds
eight DR-300 rougher flotation cells whose tails feed a 20’x 20’ zinc conditioning tank, and its concentrate stream becomes final tails.  
Overflow from the zinc conditioning tank feed to a rougher flotation bank of 12 DR-100 cells whose tails become final tails that are
transferred to tailings storage facility, and its concentrate stream feeds the zinc cleaner flotation cells bank.   Concentrate from the
cleaner cells become final concentrate that is pumped to the zinc concentrate thickener, and its tails are recirculated back to the zinc
rougher flotation DR-300 cells.

14.2.8 Plant 2 – Operational Performance

El Brocal’s Plant 2 operational results for the 2017 to 2020 period are presented on an annual basis in Table 14-3.

Ore throughput has consistently ranged from 3.1 million to 3.7 million tonnes per year but dropped to 2.8 million tonnes per year in 2020.
  Ore head grades have been reasonably consistent within the period in question: silver ranged from 1.0 oz/t to 1.3 oz/t; lead, from
approximately 1% to 1.14%; zinc from 2.1% to 3.3%; and iron content from approximately 16% to 18%.

Plant 2’s monthly average reached 277,667 tonnes equivalent to a daily average of 9,256 tonnes when assuming 30 days per month.  
The 2017 to 2020 minimum and maximum ore throughput shows a large difference of 156,753 tonnes/month and 365,998 tonnes/month
respectively, or roughly -44% and +32% of the overall average, which translates into 76% relative variability in throughput.

An analysis of throughput versus grinding P80 as seen in Figure 14-11 and Table 14-4 suggest a high degree of operational instability as
follows:

● Over the period in question, the P80 has ranged widely between 10µm and 294µm.  Similarly the situation at Plant 1, this is an
unusually large range that strongly suggests issues at the process control level.  It would be highly unusual for a mill to efficiently
operate within such a wide P80 range.

● At any given P80, the possible throughput covers an unusually large range.  For example, the operational statistics show that at
P80=160µm, the throughput could range between 1,029 tonnes/day and 13,171 tonnes/day, which is equivalent to 131% relative
variability with regard to the overall average of 9,256 tonnes/day previously mentioned.   A similar analysis can be conducted for
every other P80 as shown in Table 14-4.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 217

Table 14-3:  El Brocal, Plant 2 – Overall Operational Results 2017 – 2020

Stream Units 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total

Fresh ore tonnes 3,126,616 3,712,511 3,714,615 2,774,251 13,327,994
Ag oz/t 1.30 1.04 1.24 1.23 1.20
Pb% 1.13% 1.03% 1.14% 1.07% 1.09%
Zn% 2.7% 2.1% 2.2% 3.3% 2.5%
Fe% 17.5% 15.8% 16.1% 17.9% 16.7%
Concentrate Pb tonnes 41,435 42,584 53,448 36,718 174,185
Ag oz/t 46.21 38.73 37.25 36.98 39.68
Pb% 48.8% 49.4% 47.5% 47.1% 48.2%
Zn% 6.3% 6.5% 7.4% 7.7% 7.0%
Fe% 7.8% 7.3% 7.4% 8.3% 7.7%
Rec Ag 47.2% 42.8% 43.1% 39.8% 43.4%
Rec Pb 57.3% 55.3% 59.8% 58.0% 57.6%
Rec Zn 3.1% 3.6% 4.8% 3.1% 3.6%
Rec Fe 0.6% 0.5% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6%
Mass pull 1.3% 1.1% 1.4% 1.3% 1.3%
Concentrate Zn tonnes 97,527 90,161 91,384 102,056 381,128
Ag oz/t 10.45 10.20 12.91 8.32 10.41
Pb% 3.6% 3.9% 3.9% 2.9% 3.6%
Zn% 49.7% 49.5% 49.3% 49.2% 49.4%
Fe% 5.7% 5.4% 5.2% 6.1% 5.6%
Rec Ag 25.1% 23.9% 25.6% 24.9% 24.9%
Rec Pb 10.1% 9.3% 8.4% 10.0% 9.4%
Rec Zn 58.1% 58.0% 54.7% 55.3% 56.5%
Rec Fe 1.02% 0.84% 0.80% 1.3% 1.0%
Mass pull 3.1% 2.4% 2.5% 3.7% 2.9%
Concentrate
Total tonnes 138,961 132,745 144,832 138,774 555,313
Ag oz/t 21.11 19.35 21.89 15.90 19.59
Pb% 17.1% 18.5% 20.0% 14.6% 17.6%
Zn% 36.8% 35.7% 33.8% 38.2% 36.1%
Fe% 6.4% 6.0% 6.0% 6.7% 6.3%
Rec Ag 72.3% 66.7% 68.7% 64.7% 68.3%
Rec Pb 67.4% 64.6% 68.1% 67.9% 67.0%
Rec Zn 61.2% 61.6% 59.5% 58.5% 60.1%
Rec Fe 1.6% 1.4% 1.5% 1.9% 1.6%
Mass pull 4.4% 3.6% 3.9% 5.0% 4.2%
Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 218

Table 14-4:  Plant 2, Throughput Variability v/s Grinding P80

Plant 2 – Throughput, tonnes/day

P80 Relative Variability
Min Max

@9256 t/d
130 0 0% 0 0% 0%
140 9,506 3% 13,559 46% 44%
150 3,087 -67% 13.872 50% 117%
160 1,029 -89% 13,171 42% 131%
170 1,086 -88% 13,371 44% 133%
180 5,519 -40% 12,967 40% 80%
190 4,186 -55% 13,527 46% 101%
200 7,214 -22% 11,864 28% 50%
210 4,545 -51% 13,742 48% 99%
220 9,921, 7% 12,896 39% 32%
230 0 0% 0 0% 0%
240 9,391 1%0 9,688 5%. 3%
Source: BVN

Figure 14-11:  Plant 2, Ore Throughput v/s Grinding P80

Source: BVN

Figure 14-13 shows throughput and grinding P80 over the 2017 to 2020 period, which shows that starting around July 2019, the reported
grinding P80 values seems to repeat (or are identical) for multiple consecutive days at a time.  This performance is highly unusual for any
processing plant and deserves El Brocal’s full attention.  Figure 14-12 confirms significant variability for P80, and more critically, indicates
that on 80% of the days, the primary grinding P80 ranged between 120 µm and 200 µm.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 219

Figure 14-12:  Plant 2, Grinding P80 Frequency Distribution

Source: BVN

Figure 14-13:  Plant 2, Ore Throughput & Grinding P80 v/s Time
Source: BVN
In terms of lead concentrate, an analysis of relationships between lead recovery and other key indicators for Plant 2 are shown in Figure
14-14, Figure 14-15, and Figure 14-16.   The following observations can be made:

· Silver recovery reaches a correlation coefficient of R2= 0.79; lead’s head grade suggests a strong degree of association between
both metals.

· Recovery of zinc to lead concentrate also presents a high correlation coefficient with lead recovery, which more than likely
translated into penalties at 7% Zn grade average in the 2017-2020 period.   Mineral associations, and consequently liberation
size (P80) and flotation conditions, are typically responsible for the cross contamination of concentrate.  Additionally, Plant 2’s
regrind stage, along with its downstream rougher flotation, appears to be critical to liberate and separate lead from zinc.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 220

· The correlations v/s P80 suggest rather poor relationships with recoveries and concentrate grades, which coupled with the
previous observation about the large variability in throughput v/s P80, strongly suggests that if El Brocal expects to improve its
metallurgical performance, it needs to seriously review all process control practices and potentially incorporate adjustments in its
flowsheet.   The key aspects that require attention include deportment of metals in the multiple flotation stages; tighter control of
the product particle size off the primary grinding; and re-grinding ball mills.

· Lead recovery exhibits a correlation coefficient of R2=0.69 with lead’s head grade.

Figure 14-14:  Plant 2, Key Metallurgical Relationships

Source: BVN

Figure 14-15:  Plant 2, Recovery v/s P80

Source: BVN

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 221

Figure 14-16:  Plant 2, Concentrates Grade v/s P80

Source: BVN

An additional look at the relationship between concentrate mass pull; metal to recovery to concentrates; and concentrates grades is
presented in Figure 14-15 and 14-16, the following observations ca be made:

· Recovery to lead concentrate shows a strong relationship with mass pull as expressed by their correlation coefficients of R2=
0.73 for silver, R2= 0.73 for lead, and R2= 0.69 for zinc.

· Similarly, lead concentrate grades are highly correlated to mass pull and show correlation coefficients of R2= 0.4, R2= 0.  46,
and R2= 0.41 respectively.  These facts, coupled with the previous analysis for Figures 14-12 to Figure 14-14, strongly suggests
that Plant 2’s actual operating criteria is mainly focused on mass pull and that limited attention is paid to the liberation size and
selectivity.

14.3 Conclusions & Recommendations

· Mined ore is re-handled multiple times before being delivered to the mill.  In SRK’s opinion, there are no technical reasons to
support rehandling.   Apparently, this takes reflects a social commitment with surrounding communities. Additional and
unnecessary expenditure is a clear outcome from this practice.

· During the visit to El Brocal facilities, SRK observed a highly unusual and unnecessary number of operators for a maintenance
job on a small rod mill.  The explanation given to SRK was that the number of operators was directly associated with contractual
obligations with the union.

· Both Plant 1 and Plant 2 show a high degree of variability in their key performance indicators, which includes tonnes per day
(and tonnes per hour) of fresh feed and grinding P80.  An unstable mill feed is usually a driver of low recovery and poor-quality
concentrates.  The mill´s mechanical availability appears to be driven by regular malfunctioning or upsets mostly from ancillary
systems like conveyor and chutes, and not from major process equipment problems.

· Process automation, although present, is not operating to the standards required.  An online metal assaying system for flotation
was not working at the time of the visit, and apparently haven’t operated for a long time.   Typically, unless the operating
workforce is well experienced and has a positive attitude towards continuous improvement, the only

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 222

tools to maintain and improve metallurgical performance is to measure the key variables and then work towards improvement.

· In SRK’s opinion, the absence of a system to integrate geological, mining, metallurgical, and commercial data in a suitable
geometallurgical model is negatively impacting El Brocal’s bottom line.  The processing plant will perform at its maximum when
fresh feed is within expected parameters for lithology, mineralogy, alteration and grades.  At this in time, El Brocal seems to
consider only parameters for grade.  Additional mechanical issues at the plant are also taking a toll.  

· SRK is also of the opinion that given El Brocal’s potentially long mine life, efforts to modernize the flowsheet, particularly for the
crushing-grinding stages, should be assessed.   Currently, the use of small capacity rod mills followed by ball mills is clearly
demanding large operating and maintenance crews and driving low mechanical availability, which jacks up operating
expenditures.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 223

15 Infrastructure

15.1 Waste Rock Management Facility

The Condorcayan waste rock management facility is located towards the northern area of the Mercedes Norte pit, at an approximate
distance of 300 m. Figure 15-1 shows the plan location of the deposit and pit.
The feasibility design was developed in 2008 by DCR Ingenieros.  It considered an extension of 205 Ha for a storage volume of 135.7
Mm³ or 240 Mt and an estimated density of 1.8 t/m³ of dumped waste rock.   This storage capacity would cover the life of mine forecasts,
which for that year contemplated a production of 110 Mt of waste rock over a period of 10 years.
The facility design contemplates 12 m high benches with 35° slopes, and a berm width of 15.6 m.  Geometry establishes an overall slope
of 21° with a total height of 165 m, reaching the maximum storage level at 4,486 MASL.
During this study, geological and geotechnical investigations were carried out to define the foundation materials and characterize the
waste rock.  As part of drilling activities, glacial deposits with a high content of plastic clays were identified, which would be part of the
facility foundation, in addition to the bedrock, which showed signs of significant alterations.
Although the stability analyses indicated that the proposed design criteria have been met, said criteria needs to be defined more
rigorously according to the risk of the structure.  Investigation needs to be expanded to contemplate future phases.  Additionally, SRK
recommends complementing the analyses by focusing on the consequences of foundation failure relative to the recharge height of the
facility and the undrained behavior of the clay foundation; it will also be necessary to determine if the facility’s interaction with the pit
follows parameters for physical security.  
Regarding the geochemical evaluation of waste rock, it has been characterized as a non-acid generating material; however, research on
this point has been limited and should be expanded in future studies with a larger number of static and kinetic tests.
In addition, the design contemplates surface runoff diversion works through the construction of diversion dikes, canals, and spillways.  
The design event for surface water diversion works contemplated a maximum of 24-hours of rainfall for a return period of 500 years.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 224

Figure 15-1:  Condorcayan waste Dump

Source: BVN

15.2 Tailings Management Facility

15.2.1 Huachuacaja tailings management facility and ancillary facilities

General Description

The tailings management facility is located in Huachuacaja Creek.   Its maximum capacity to contain the tailings generated at the
Huaraucaca Concentrator Plant (located 2 km from the facility) contemplates average ore production rate of 18,000 tpd; the tailings to be
deposited will come from lead-zinc (13,500 tpd) and copper-arsenic (4,500 tpd) processes.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 225

The area has been studied since 1999 as a potential tailings deposition area, with pre-feasibility and feasibility studies conducted by
Klohn Crippen (1999), Knight Piesold (2001), AMEC (2007-2009), GWI (2007-2010), and Golder (2009-2010).  The detailed engineering
of Huachuacaja tailings management facility was performed by Golder (2012).  
Construction of the first stage of the Huachuacaja talilings dam (elevation 4157.5 MASL) was built in 2012 an completed in August 2013.
 Huachuacaja tailings management facility started operations in 2014.  
Currently, the Huachuacaja tailings dam is constructed up to Stage 3 (elev.  4167.5 MASL), storing approximately 42 Mt of tailings, with
an average beach slope of 0.5%, with a pond volume of 0.65 Mm³. Based on the design, up to Stage 8 (elevation 4197.5 MASL), it is
estimated that a maximum tailings storage capacity of 266 Mt accumulated will be reached, considering an average dry tailings density
of 1.59 t/m³.  
The facilities considered for the Huachuacaja tailings management facility are:

· Tailings dam built with soil and rock quarry material, and non-acid generating mine waste rock.  This dam considered the average
excavation of 4 m of organic material and its replacement with coarse rockfill material (Type 3 and Type 3A material).  The upstream
slope of the dam has been constructed and will be heightened using low permeability soils (Type 1 and Type 4A material) and
includes an HDPE geomembrane to minimize seepage through the tailings dam.  The downstream slope has been constructed and
will be heightened with mine waste material from the north pit (Type 4 material) and borrow material quarries (Type 4).  A transition
material (Material Type 2) has been considered between Material Type 3 and Type 4.

The Huachuacaja dam has installed geotechnical instrumentation consisting of electric piezometers (24), settlement cells (6),
accelerometers (1) and topographic control milestones (13).  

· Seepage collection pond and groundwater quality monitoring wells to collect seepage from the tailings management facility,
which exit at the foot of Huachuacaja dam.  It is located at the downstream foot of Huachuacaja dam and has a seepage collection
capacity of about 10 l/s for 6 hours.   The seepage collection pond has a pumping system with a capacity of 10 l/s to the
Huachuacaja tailings management facility.  If the quality of the collected water is Class III (according to DGA-MEM standards), the
water will be discharged directly to the Huachuacaja creek.  Downstream and upstream of the seepage collection pond, a 50 m deep
monitoring well has been considered for groundwater quality monitoring and water level measurements.

· Perimeter surface water diversion channels to the Huachuacaja tailings management facility.   Two channels called East
Perimeter Channel and West Perimeter Channel of 5.9 and 2.6 km in length, respectively, have been constructed.  These channels,
which are trapezoidal in shape and have a minimum slope of 0.5%, will be lined with masonry and will collect natural water from a
basin area of 6.7 km², which is 40% of the total basin area of the tailings management facility.  These hydraulic works will reduce
rainwater that may flow into the

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 226

tailings management facility and will return natural surface water downstream of the tailings management facility.

· Slurry tailings haulage system from the Huaraucaca Concentrator Plant (Plant 1) to the Tailings Thickening Plant, by means of a
650 m long 18" SDR 9 HDPE piping pump system.  From the new Concentrator Plant (Plant 2), the slurry tailings will be conveyed to
the Tailings Thickening Plant through a 500 m long pumping line made of 28” SDR 11 HDPE pipeline.  The average elevation of both
concentrator plants is 4200 MASL and the elevation of the Tailings Thickening Plant will be 4250 MASL. There is also a slime
pumping system (discontinuous operation), generated by the fine fraction of both plants (Plant 1 and 2), which reaches a metal box
called Box 11, located in the thickening plant, from where the slime is pumped to the Huachuacaja tailings management facility
through a 22" SDR 17 HDPE pipe.

· Tailings thickening plant consisting of one (1) Westech HCT (High Compression Thickener) type thickener with a 40 m diameter
and 6.5 m wall height.  Slurry tailings with a solids content between 24 to 26% from the two Concentrator Plants enter the thickener
and leave with a solids content between 54 to 56%.   The Tailings Thickening Plant is located 500 m north-northwest of the
Huaraucaca Concentrator Plant, at an elevation of 4250 MASL, from which tailings (thickener underflow) are sent to the
Huachuacaja tailings management facility.  The overflow water, with NTU content between 18 to 60 and average of 40, is sent to
Box 11, Pb/Zn washing plant, and flocculant dilution water tank.  

· Thickened tailings distribution system from the tailings Thickening Plant to the Huachuacaja tailings management facility.  The
system consists of two (2) pump trains (three centrifugal pumps installed in series), called Train 5, consisting of three 8" x 6"
Warman pumps; and Train 6, consisting of one 10" x 8" Warman pump and two 8"x6" GIW pumps, which pump the tailings through a
12" ASTM A53 SCH 80 steel pipe, which reaches a bifurcation point in the tailings management facility area, from which the tailings
are diverted to two discharge sectors, called the South sector and West sector.  The South sector, which passes through the crest of
Huachuacaja dam, has a length of 1 km and the western sector, which corresponds to the right bank of the tailings management
facility, has a length of 5 km.  Each discharge sector is considered to have 8" SDR 11 HDPE discharge pipes every 200 m to the
final distribution points, controlled by valves.  

· Emergency slurry tailings pumping and conveyance system from the tailings Thickening Plant to the west slope of the tailings
management facility, adjacent to the Huachuacaja dam.   The emergency tailings pipeline will operate, when required, through a
bypass of the thickener and will be activated when the thickener or the thickened tailings pumping system is not operating due to
maintenance or technical failure.  The pumping of slurry tailings from this emergency system will be by centrifugal pumps.  This 22"
SDR 17 HDPE emergency line consists of three sections of different diameters, comprising 0.7 km of 16", 0.9 km of 14", and 0.3 km
of 12".

· Water recirculation system from the tailings management facility pond to the reclaimed water tank.  This recirculation system
is designed to pump 134 l/s from a barge to a booster station and from there by pumping (centrifuges) to the process water
Collection Tank located adjacent to the Tailings Thickening Plant, through a 12" SDR 11 HDPE pipe.  The total length

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 227

of the water recirculation piping is variable depending on the location of the tailings management facility.  During the first four (4)
years of operation, the pumping length is approx.  2.9 km.  The booster station will have two (2) different locations, the first at 1 km
from the tailings dam and at 4220 MASL; the second location will be 2.5 km from the tailings dam and at 4225 MASL.

· Excess water recirculation system from the tailings management facility pond to the WWTPi.  Excess water from the tailings
pond is sent to the industrial wastewater treatment plant (WWTPi), where it is conditioned to reduce its metal content and control its
pH.  The feed system to the WWTPi consists of two (2) centrifugal pumps of 100 HP each, installed on a barge, which send the
water (500 to 600 m³/h) through a 16" HDPE pipe to a distribution box.  The sludge generated at the WWTPi is sent to the tailings
management facility through a 200 m³/h capacity pump.  

· Tailings Desulfurization Plant, which is designed to treat 100% of tailings from the 18 ktpd processing, functions by removing
sulfides from the tailings so that the tailings that are deposited are not potentially acid-generating.  The sulfides that are removed,
which constitute about 14% of the total tailings, will be deposited underwater in the Huachuacaja tailings management facility.  This
plant would start operating during the last three (3) years of operation, as part of the tailings management facility closure plan.

Studies Performed

The Huachuacaja area has been studied since 1999 as a potential tailings deposition area, with Pre-feasibility, Feasibility, and Detailed
Engineering studies conducted by:

· Klohn Crippen (2000).  Klohn Crippen - SVS Ingenieros Consultores (KC-SVS).  Huachuacaja Dam and Pond - Final Report and
Plans.  April 2000.  

· Knight Piesold (2001).   Knight Piesold Consultores S.A.   (KP).   Final Study for the Construction of the Huachuacaja Tailings
Dam.  Final Study Report.  April 2001.  

· AMEC (2008).  AMEC, 2008.   Geotechnical Investigations of El Brocal Feasibility Study, Cerro de Pasco-Peru.   Prepared for
SMEB.  August 2008.

· BCG (2009).  BGC Engineering Inc.  Screening Level for Tailings Management Facilities (TMF) - SMEB Huachuacaja Dam TMF
for 130 M-t Tailings Capacity – Alternate Conceptual Designs.  Prepared for SMEB.  May 2009

· Ground Water International (2008).

o (GWI), 2008a.  Comprehensive Hydrogeological Study of the Colquijirca Mine.  Final Report.  December 2008.  

o GWI, 2008b.  Hydrogeological Investigation of the Marcapunta Oeste Cavern, Colquijirca Mine.  Prepared for SMEB.  

· SVS Ingenieros S.A.C.   Pre-Feasibility Study for the Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.   Prepared for SMEB.   June
2009.  

· Golder (2010).  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 228

o Golder, 2010a.   Geological Evaluation of the Tailings Management Facility Area.   Basic Engineering Study of the
Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  September 2010.  
o Golder 2010b.  Seismic Hazard Assessment of the Project Area.  Basic Engineering Study of the Huachuacaja Tailings
Management Facility.  Prepared for SMEB.  September 2010.  
o Golder 2010c.   Hydrology of the Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility Area.   Basic Engineering of the
Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  September 2010.
o Golder, 2010d.  Tailings Water Quality - Mine Coal and Slag Liabilities.   Basic Engineering Study of the Huachuacaja
Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  September 2010.
o Golder, 2010e.   Geochemical Characterization of Liabilities, Tailings, and Borrow Materials for the Dam.   Basic
Engineering Study of the Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.   Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.
 September 2010.
o Golder, 2010f.   Hydrogeological Evaluation of the Tailings Management Facility Area.   Basic Engineering Study of the
Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  September 2010.  
o Golder, 2010g.  Geotechnical Assessment.  Basic Engineering Study of the Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.
 Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  September 2010.  
o Golder 2010h.   Huachuacaja Tailings Rheology.   Basic Engineering of the Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.
 Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  September 2010.
o Golder 2010i.  Water Balance of the Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility of Colquijirca Mine.  Basic Engineering
of the Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  September 2010.  
o Golder 2010j.   Stability Analysis of the Huachuacaja Tailings Dam of Colquijirca Mine.   Basic Engineering of the
Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  September 2010.  
o Golder 2010k.   Seepage Analysis of the Huachuacaja Tailings Dam of Colquijirca Mine.   Basic Engineering of the
Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  September 2010.
· Golder (2011).  
o Golder 2011a.   Soils Study for Major Equipment Foundation Purposes - Detailed Engineering of Huachuacaja Tailings
Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  February 2011.
o Golder 2011b.  Detailed Thickened Tailings Deposition Plan.  Detailed Engineering of Huachuacaja Tailings Management
Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  February 2011.  

o Golder 2011c.   Deformation Evaluation of Huachuacaja Dam under Static and Dynamic Conditions.   Detailed
Engineering of Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  February 2011.  

o Golder 2011d.   Closure Plan for Coal and Slag Liabilities in the Huachuacaja creek area.   Detailed Engineering of
Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  March 2011.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 229

o Golder, 2011e.  Planning for the Procurement of Construction Materials for the Huachuacaja Tailings Dam.  Prepared for
Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  March 2011.  

o Golder 2011f.   Operation Manual of the Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility of Colquijirca Mine.   Detailed
Engineering of Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  April 2011.  

o Golder 2011g.  Design of Dump for Material Unsuitable for Construction.  Detailed Engineering of Huachuacaja Tailings
Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  April 2011.

· Golder (2012).  

o Golder 2012a.  North Pit Mining Plan for Obtaining Rockfill Material - Tailings Dam Construction.  Detailed Engineering of
Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  May 2012

o Golder 2012b.  Water Balance of the Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.  Detailed Engineering of Huachuacaja
Tailings Management Facility.  Prepared for Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  May 2012

o Golder 2012c.   Detailed Engineering of Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.   Report version 4.   Prepared for
Sociedad Minera El Brocal.  May 2012

· Golder (2021).  Technical File Update Project for the amended EIA - DRH.  Final Report.  Update of Technical File for the MEIA
of Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility.   Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.   Report No. 5800001952-300-00-ITE-
0001_Rev1.  September 30, 2021.

Field Investigation Performed

The geotechnical investigations carried out in the area of the Huachuacaja tailings management facility were executed through several
campaigns between 2000 and 2020.  The primary purpose was to characterize the foundation ground for the project's main components
and/or study the quarries.  The summary of geotechnical field investigation carried out is shown in Table 15-1.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S.A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 230

Table 15-1:  Summary of Geotechnical Investigation

Test Pits/ Diamond Permeability MASW/ Seismic
SPT/
Area Study Trenching
drillings (Lugeon/
DPL CPTu MAN
refraction
LPT

Lefranc)
(m)
Vaso and Lara Consulting - 4 70 28/25 - 4 12 -
Huachuacaja (2019)
Dam
Golder (2010) 6 12 131 111 - 6 8 2880
Amec (2008) - 21 45 - - - - -
Knight Piésold - 7 49 - - - - -
(2001)
Klohn Crippen – 10 5 17 - - - - -
SVS (2000)
SVS (2009) - - - - - - - 600
Golder (2010) 4 - - - - - - -
Diversion Golder (2010) 20 - - - 8 - - -
Channel
Seepage Golder (2010) 5 - - - 6 - - -
collection pond
Quarries Golder (2010) 45 1 9 13 - - - -
Golder (2015) 11 - - - - - - -
Golder (2018) 5 - - - - - - -
Coal and slag Golder (2010) 22 2 9 10 - - - 1080
Liabilities
Total 128 52 330 25 - - 3960
Source: Golder

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 231

Capacity of the Tailings Management Facility

The Huachuacaja tailings management facility has been designed to be heightened in eight stages, which correspond to: Stage 1
(4157.5 MASL), Stage 2 (4161.5 MASL), Stage 3 (4167.5 MASL), Stage 4 (4173.5 MASL), Stage 5 (4178.5 MASL), Stage 6 (4184.5
MASL), Stage 7 (4193.5 MASL), and Stage 8 (4197.5 MASL).  Heightening is currently up to Stage 3, having stored 42 Mt of tailings and
it is estimated that it can store an accumulated volume of 86 Mt up to Stage 4; 116 Mt up to Stage 5; 164 Mt up to Stage 6; 242 Mt up to
Stage 7; and 266 Mt up to Stage 8 and considers the formation of a tailings beach of 0.  5%; a freeboard of 5 m; an operational pond
volume of 1.0 Mm³; and a probable maximum flood (PMF) volume of 3.8 Mm³, corresponding to a probable maximum of 24-hour rainfall
of 229 mm.  The average dry density of the deposited tailings will be 1.59 t/m³.

Tailings Management Facility Heightening Strategy

The main tailings management facility design criteria are:

· Deposition of tailings from the ore process.  

· Heightening of dam in stages using the downstream method to favor the gradual dissipation of pore pressure.  

· As part of the Huachuacaja dam foundation, a platform and compacted low permeability material has been placed to the
upstream foot and slope face, on which a liner has been installed to mitigate deformations in the early operation stage and flows
through the dam body.  

· Move the tailings management facility pond away from the western slope of the tailings management facility where there is
evidence of karst zones and fault alignments, both likely pathways for seepage outside the tailings management facility area.  

· Move the tailings management facility pond away from the tailings dam to minimize risks of tailings dam instability.  

· Flexible management of the recovery system for water from the tailings management facility pond.  

· Inhibit tailings oxidation to minimize the risk of acid generation from the tailings.  

· The tailings deposited will be the closure cover for the existing coal and slag liabilities on the east slope of the Huachuacaja
creek.  

· Facilitate closure of the tailings management facility.

Construction QA/QC procedures, results, and additional controls

Each construction stage will be supported by a Quality Dossier report, which provides relevant information on the construction process
and describes work quality management.   It is developed based on the plans and technical specifications of each of the tailings
management facility’s components.   The report will contain graphic reports (as-built plans, photographic records) and documentation of
laboratory tests that validate the work performed, as well as quality management documents, such as: request for information (RFI),
design change request (DCR), field instructions (FI), surveillance reports (SVR) and non-conformities (NCR).  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 232

The tailings management facility dam is currently constructed to Stage 3.   Plans and technical specifications have been followed and
design changes and field instructions have been implemented, as endorsed in the Quality Dossier report.

Heightening Phases

Currently, the Huachuacaja tailings management facility is constructed to Stage 3, with future heightening estimated to be as shown in
Table 15-2.  

Table 15-2:  Huachuacaja Tailings Management Facility Heightening Schedule.

Stage Start of construction End of construction
4 (Phase 1 and 2) March 2022 November 2022
4 (Phase 3) February 2023 November 2023
5 July 2025 May 2027
6 July 2028 August 2030
7 June 2037 June 2038
8 March 2048 March 2049
Source: Golder
Tailings Characteristics

The mineralized zone is characterized by the existence of iron sulfides (pyrite), copper (Tennantite), lead (galena), and zinc (sphalerite),
with gangue minerals such as quartz, clays such as alunite, illite, and kaolinite, iron oxides and carbonates such as dolomite and siderite.
 The Cu-As tailings have a pyrite content of 36%, 5 times higher than that of Pb-Zn.  The quartz content of Cu-As tailings is 47% and is 2
times higher than that of Pb-Zn.  The iron oxide content of Pb-Zn tailings is 18% and is 30 times higher than that of Cu-As.  

The tailings are the size of silts with sands.  The sand content is 18% and fines content is 82%.  The clay content and specific gravity of
mixed tailings are 18% and 3.17, respectively.  

From the laboratory results, the following can be stated:

· The expected average permeability range for the thickened tailings deposited is in the order of 2x108m/s to 8x10-9 m/s, with a
mean value of 1x10-8 m/s.  

· The average void ratio of the deposited tailings is in the order of 0.9 to 1.0, considering an average height of 20 m of deposited
tailings.  

Regarding tailings rheology, for a solids content of 60 to 70%, the unsheared yield stress of Huachuacaja tailings is 60 to 90 Pa.  In order
to have thickened tailings with sufficient fluidity, the target thickening of 62% solids content is estimated to be adequate for the specific
case of tailings deposition at Huachuacaja, where the focus, rather than maximizing deposition slopes, is on obtaining a low segregable
tailings mass with low permeability that flows after being discharged into the tailings management facility.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 233

Main Design Considerations

The tailings dam is considered as a zoned dam built with rockfill material, moraine soil, and non-acid generating mine waste rock from
the north pit.  

· Waterproofing of the upstream slope by means of a low permeability soil cover with a minimum thickness of 10 m, on which a 1.5
mm HDPE geomembrane will be placed.  This waterproofing system is intended to minimize seepage through the tailings dam.  

· Geotechnical instrumentation of the dam.   It will consist of the installation of fiber optic piezometers, settlement cells, and an
accelerograph.   This instrumentation is intended to measure pore pressure; deformations of the dam and its foundation; and
seismic records.  The purpose of all of the aforementioned is to monitor the dam's behavior.

The tailings dam considers a foundation treatment consisting of:

· Excavation of peat and superficial organic material, in an average thickness of 4 m in the entire foundation area of the dam, at
the bottom of the valley.  This excavation will be performed at the beginning of the dam Stage 1 construction (elevation 4207
MASL).  

· For the closure of the tailings management facility, a foundation treatment using gravel columns and the construction of a toe
berm has been considered.   Whether or not to apply this foundation treatment will depend on what is reported by the
geotechnical instrumentation monitoring and SPT tests to verify the improvement of the foundation soil strength and to be
performed during the fourth (4) year of the tailings management facility operation.  

The construction and operational aspects of the Huachuacaja dam are as follows:

· Tailings dam built in stages; starting dam elevation is 4207 MASL(year 0 of operation) and final dam elevation is 4247
MASL(year 20 of operation).  

· The dam will be built continuously from year 1 to year 20 of operation.  

The main characteristics of the tailings dam include:

· Height: 56 m, for the final stage.  

· Crest length: 808 m, for the final stage.  
· Crest width: 20 m, for all stages  
· Upstream Slope: 2.5H:1V, with a 5 m bench between each construction stage.  
· Downstream Slope: 3H:1V, with a 55 m bench at elevation 4210 MASL.  
· Volume

Huachuacaja Dam Stability

The stability of the Huachuacaja tailings management facility dam has been evaluated by the limit equilibrium method, considering static,
pseudo-static, post-seismic loading conditions.  Additionally, stability has been evaluated by the stress-strain method, considering the
seismic demand associated with the design earthquake, corresponding to the maximum credible earthquake (MCE).  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 234

The minimum safety factors considered as acceptability criteria correspond to 1.5 for static conditions, 1.0 for pseudo-static conditions,
and 1.2 for post-seismic conditions.   Table 15-3 shows the summary of safety factors for different stages of heightening.  
Based on the results of stress-strain analysis, in the crest zone of the Huachuacaja dam, displacements in the order of 2.5 m vertically
and 4 m horizontally are observed, without implying the loss of containment of the stored tailings.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 235

Table 15-3:  Results of Physical Stability Analyses of the Huachuacaja Tailings Dam.
Upstream Slope Safety
Scenario Section Downstream Slope Safety
Factors
Block-type Failure Circular-type Failure
Pseudo- Post- Pseudo-
Static Static
static seismic static
Stage 4 Elevations 4223 MASL G-G´ 2.64 1.01 1.32 4.54 1.29
H-H´ 3.43 1.02 1.49 4.54 1.29
I-I´ 3.42 1.01 1.50 4.54 1.29
J-J´ 3.31 1.01 1.38 4.54 1.29
Stage 5 Elevation 4228 MASL G-G´ 3.61 1.14 1.40 5.28 1.16
H-H´ 3.98 1.08 1.52 5.28 1.16
I-I´ 3.95 1.05 1.51 5.28 1.16
J-J´ 3.90 1.05 1.34 5.28 1.16
Stage 6 Elevation 4234 MASL G-G´ 3.64 1.16 1.40 4.53 1.27
H-H´ 3.54 1.08 1.45 4.53 1.27
I-I´ 3.34 1.06 1.41 4.53 1.27
J-J´ 3.42 1.08 1.22 4.53 1.27
Stage 7 4243 MASL G-G´ 3.49 1.19 1.42 4.53 1.09
H-H´ 3.31 1.11 1.38 4.53 1.09
I-I´ 3.43 1.15 1.49 4.53 1.09
J-J´ 3.28 1.13 1.23 4.53 1.09
Stage 8 4247 MASL G-G´ 3.38 1.20 1.37 5.87 1.14
H-H´ 3.24 1.14 1.36 5.87 1.14
I-I´ 3.31 1.14 1.45 5.87 1.14
J-J´ 3.13 1.12 1.20 5.87 1.14

Source: Golder

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 236

Operational Conditions for Dam Construction

The construction and operational aspects of the Huachuacaja Dam are as follows:

· Tailings dam built in stages; starting dam elevation is 4207 MASL (year 0 of operation) and final dam elevation is 4247 MASL
(year 20 of operation).

· The dam will be built continuously from year 1 to year 20 of operation.

The construction of Stage 1 of the dam includes the following activities:

· Diversion work for the construction of dam fills, consisting of a dam and diversion pipeline.  

· Excavation of the first four (4) superficial meters of the foundation ground and subsequent replacement of this excavated area
with resistant and inert rockfill material, until reaching the level of natural ground (Material 3 and 3A).  

· The first layer of fill in the dam foundation will consist of boulder material - blocks (D50 = 0.8 m), Material 3A, which will have to
reach up to 1 meter above the excavation level.  A displacement by weight is foreseen in the area of soft soils (wetland) in the
order of 1 m, and in some sectors, it will be greater than 1 m.  Then the filling continues with Material 3 with a minimum thickness
of 2 m (rockfill material), Material 2 with a minimum thickness of 1 m (transition material), and Material 4 (massive fill material for
the dam).  

· Filling with compacted moraine soil on the upstream slope.  This is applicable on the entire upstream slope and with a minimum
width of 10m.  

· The rest of the dam body will be constructed with mine waste rock from the north pit.  Fill compacted in layers of 1 m thick to
form the dam body.  The material used must be non-acid-generating.  

· Waterproofing of the dam's upstream slope with 1.5 mm HDPE geomembrane.  

· Installation of geotechnical instrumentation.  

· Disposal of excess construction material in a dump located 2.0 km northwest of the tailings dam.

Materials for dam construction come from the following sources:

· Moraine material will be obtained from the moraine quarry, located 1 km north of the dam axis, on the eastern aspect of
Huachuacaja valley.  

· The boulder-block and rockfill material will be obtained from the intrusive quarry, located 2 km north of the dam axis on the
western aspect of Huachuacaja valley.  

· 100% of the mine waste material will be sourced directly from the north mine pit.  The average haulage distance is 6 km.  

· The drainage and filter materials will be obtained from the intrusive quarry and/or from San Juan River or Sacra Familia quarry, if
not available in the first two (2) quarries mentioned above.  

The specifications for placement and compaction of materials are shown in Table 15-4.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 237

Table 15-4:  Specifications for Placement and Compaction of Dam Materials

Maximum Size Maximum Layer Compaction
Material Description No. of passes
(mm) Thickness (mm) Equipment
1 Low Permeability fill – 150 0.3 Vibratory Roller -
Moraine 10
2 Transition Material 300 0.5 Vibratory Roller 4
10
3 Coarse-rockfill 1000 1.0 Vibratory Roller 4
10
3A Boulders-Blocks 2000 1.0 - -
4 Dam Body Mass Fill 500 0.75 Vibratory Roller 4
10
4A Los Permeability Fill 75 0.3 Vibratory Roller -
Waste Rock 10
5 Rolling Surfaces 50 0.25 Vibratory Roller
10
10 Geomembrane - - Vibratory Roller
10
Source: Golder

Periodic Inspection Policy

Protocols and reports are presented in the Project Operation Manual, which are:
· Daily tailings management facility operation reports.   Includes information on tonnage of tailings deposited, and areas
discharged.  
· Monthly reports of geotechnical monitoring of the tailings management facility.  Includes monthly and cumulative statistics, water
table, and tailings management facility displacement measurements.  

Continuous Monitoring Policy

CMB's policies and commitments are outlined in the Project Operation Manual, which includes the following main commitments:

· Tailing’s particle sizes and solids % monitoring.  

· Monitoring of excess water quality of the tailings management facility pond to be discharged to the environment.  
· Tailing’s deposition sequence specified in this manual.  
· Monitor the grade of the tailings management facility slopes (See Table 15-5).  
· Monitoring of geotechnical instrumentation (see Table 15-5).

Likewise, normal operating procedures for the tailings management facility include the following activities:

· Control that the tailings water level does not exceed 5 m of freeboard.  
· Permanently operate the slurry tailings pumping system.  

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 238

· Permanently operate the tailings thickening system.  

· Permanently operate the thickened tailings pumping system.  
· Permanently operate the recirculated water pumping system.  
· Permanently operate the excess water pumping system.  
· Permanently operate the neutralization-sedimentation plant.  
· Control the tailings management facility piezometers (weekly controls).
· Control the geotechnical instrumentation of the dam.  
· Maintain the runoff diversion operational.

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 239

Table 15-5:  Geotechnical Instrumentation Monitoring Frequency.

Type of Frequency of Measurement (in rainy Frequency of measurement (in dry

Symbol Location Frequency of Measurement (Post-closure)
instrument season) season)
After the After the
After the occurrence
occurrence
After
First After the first In rainy
of
First year first of
of In dry season occurrence
year year season
year

extraordinary

extraordinary

extraordinary event
events
events

Once (at
Fiber optic Tailings dam Every other Every 2 the end 1 time (at the end of
P-1 Weekly Monthly Monthly -- Every other day
piezometer foundation day months of the the dry period)
season)
Once (at
Tailings dam
Settlement Every other Every 2 Every other the end 1 time (at the end of
CA-1 foundation (over Weekly Monthly Monthly Every other day
cells day months day of the the dry period)
rockfill)
season)
Once (at
Downstream and
Monitorig Every other Every 2 the end 1 time (at the end of
PM-1 upstream of seepage Monthly Monthly Monthly -- Every other day
wells day months of the the dry period)
collection pond
season)
Once (at
Alignment Every 2 the end 1 time (at the end of
A-1 Tailings dam crest Weekly Monthly Weekly Monthly Weekly Weekly
milestone months of the the dry period)
season)
Once (at
Topographic Every 2 the end 1 time (at the end of
HT-1 Tailings Dam Weekly Monthly Weekly Monthly Weekly Weekly
control point months of the the dry period)
season)
In rock near After the After the
Accelerograph AC-A
Every 6 months Every 6 months Every 6 month After the event
the dailings dam event event
Routine Once (at
inspections Every 2 the end 1 time (at the end of
    Daily Weekly Daily Daily Daily Daily
(visual): dam months of the the dry
and dump site season)
Formal Evaluation
Evaluation Evaluation Annual or
inspection of after the Annual or as Annual or as Evaluation after the
    agter the   After the as  
dam and first rainy required required even
event event required
dump area season
Source: Golder
Notes:  

1. The automatic monitoring system will record readings from piezometers and settlement cells every 6 hours.   In case of a seismic event, the piezometers located in the zone of possible
settlement will record at a rate of 100 data per second.  2.  For the specific case of earthquakes, monitoring will be carried out 12 hours after the seismic event, in no case before

SRK Consulting (Peru) S. A. April, 2022

SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 240

15.3Mine Operations Support Facilities

15.3.1 Portal Access

The underground mine will be accessed through the following portals:

● Bocamina  Marcapunta Sur
● Bocamina Principal Marcapunta Norte

15.3.2 Underground Workshop

These facilities are placed for minor repairs and immediate support of equipment.

15.3.3 Mine Administration Building

There are three offices buildings: Mine offices, Geology offices, and Main offices.

15.3.4 Other facilities

● Warehouse

This facility has an area of 800 m².

● Workshop Building

It is located in the operations zone.

● Truck Fuel Facility

The mining unit has the following fuel stations:

● Fuel station Huaraucaca
● Fuel station Marcapunta Norte
● Fuel station Tajo Norte
● Fuel station Tajo Sur

● Explosives Storage
There are two buildings: primary explosive storage and underground explosive storage.  The central explosive storage is located near the
west limit of the pit.  This magazine has a storage capacity of 150 tonnes of ammonium nitrate, 90 tonnes of dynamite, and 130 tonnes of
emulsion.  The underground magazine is located in the projection of the RB N#04.

15.4Processing Plant Support Facilities

15.4.1 Laboratory

The laboratory building is located in Huaraucaca’s industrial zone.   The facility has the following working areas: sample preparation,
assaying, testing facilities, warehouse, offices, toilets for Men & Women, and a dressing room.

15.5First-Aid Facility
The first aid facility is located in the industrial zone for early care treatment.  

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 241

15.6Man Camp
There are three man camps: one is located in the Huaraucaca zone, and the other two are located in the Colquijirca zone.

15.7Power Supply and Distribution

The power supply for the project is obtained from two hydroelectric power stations owned by Sociedad Minera El Brocal (SMEB) and
Electroandes.  The mining unit energy is provided from the following facilities:
● Hydroelectric Power Station Rio Blanco
● Hydroelectric Power Station Jupayragua
● Sub-station Tajo Sur
● Sub-station Plant N#01
● Sub-station Plant N#02
● Sub-station Marcapunta
● Sub-station Principal Cinco Manantiales
● Transmission line 138 KV-SS Cinco Manantiales, SS Cinco Manantiales, SS Oxidos – SS Paragsha
● Auxiliar lines

15.8Water Supply

15.8.1 Water Source

The source of freshwater for operations (metallurgical) comes from the Pun Run lagoon and the Blanco River.   Previously, these waters
supplied the hydroelectric plants of Rio Blanco and Jupayragra.  Turbinated waters from the Jupayragra plant are captured and conducted to
the Pilanco station, where three pumps are located; two are operation and one is on standby.  From this point, the water is pumped to the
freshwater reservoir with a capacity of 2,300 m³.  This facility is located in the industrial zone of Huaraucaca, where the water is distributed
for metallurgical operations and for use in related activities in the industrial zone of Huaraucaca.   It is specified that in addition to the
freshwater coming from the turbinated waters of the Jupayragra hydroelectric plant, the supernatant water from the tailings deposit is
recirculated to the metallurgical process.
The industrial water recirculation system from the tailings deposit Huachuacaja consists of three pumps that drive the water through three
lines of 16", 14" and 12" HDPE piping to the reservoirs of Plant No.  2, Plant No.  1 (1,600 m³ capacity each), and washing plant respectively,
from where the water is distributed to the metallurgical processes.

15.8.2 Domestic Water Treatment Plant

There are two domestic water treatment plants:

● Colquijirca plant N#01 has an area of 120 m² and a treatment capacity of 3.8 m³/h
● Colquijirca plant N#02 has an area of 60 m² and a treatment capacity of 2 m³/h
● Huaraucaca plant has a treatment capacity of 2.78 L/s.

May, 2022
 SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 242

15.9 Waste Water Treatment and Solid Water Disposal

15.9.1 Waste Water Treatment

Acid Water Treatment

This facility has an area of 10 ha.  It can treat 240L/s of acid water through the High-Density Sludge process.

Domestic Water Treatment

Domestic wastewater treatment plants (PTARD) Huaraucaca; There are two plants in the industrial zone of Huaraucaca.  They are compact
plants with an installed treatment capacity of 58 m³/d each.  The effluents are treated through a biological process of activated sludge.  
Domestic wastewater treatment plant (PTARD) Camps Colquijirca: The approximate flow sent to the plant is 69 m³/day.  In addition, there is
the option of reusing the water treated for irrigation of roads in the control of dust and irrigation of green areas inside of the unit.

15.9.2 Solid Waste Disposal

The solid waste disposal facility has an area of 6.5 ha.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 243

16 Market Studies

16.1 El Brocal markets

16.1.1 Copper market

Overview of the copper market

The copper industry is the world’s largest base metal industry.  Some of the key properties of this metal are that it is malleable, ductile and a
good conductor of heat and electricity when in a pure form.  Copper is water resistant and obtains a green patina when oxidized (as seen in
construction when roofs turn green).  Furthermore, it is germicidal, and can kill a variety of potentially harmful pathogens; this means that it
can be used to make water safe for drinking or as an anti-germicidal surface to be used in buildings such as hospitals.  

Refined copper is transformed into various semi-fabricated products – wire rod, rods, bars and sections, strip, sheet, plate, and tubes – and
later used in a number of final end uses in construction, the automotive industry, manufacturing, architecture, and other applications.  
● Copper wire rod is used to make copper wire and cable, primarily for power distribution, but also for telecommunications.  Building
wire is the most common use of wire rod and is the single biggest end use of copper.  
● Copper tube & alloy tube have a wide variety of end-uses.  However, its two most significant end-uses are plumbing tube and use in
the manufacture of HVACR (Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration) products.  
● Copper flat rolled products are widely used in applications such as electrical products, building & construction, automotive and
military segments.  Copper and copper alloy sheets and strips are used in the building industry to manufacture doors and hinges,
switches, wiring, locks, and electrical outlets.  

Figure 16-1:  Copper demand by end-use product and sector

Source: CRU
On the supply side, refined copper is made by mining, processing, and refining a variety of copper oxide and sulphide ores.  Approximately
~70% of mined ore comes from open pit operations, with the remaining ~30% coming from underground mines.  

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 244

Sulphide ores are processed via smelting.   Ore is crushed, ground, and concentrated by froth flotation to produce a concentrate that can
vary between 20%-40% copper contained.  Concentrates is fed into a smelter, where copper oxidizes at high temperatures to produce blister
copper (purity of 97-99% Cu).   Blister copper is cast into large slabs that are used as anodes in the electrolytic refining process which
produces 99.99% pure (LME grade) copper.

Oxide ores are processed via the hydrometallurgical process.   This process involves the leaching of the ore using sulphuric acid.   The
Solvent Extraction and Electrowinning processes (SX-EW) allows copper to be recovered from the solution resulting from the leaching
process.  

Scrap can be used at different stages of the copper production chain depending on its quality.  Low grade scrap can be used as feedstock
into integrated smelter-refinery operations that wish to increase blister production, whilst high grade scrap can be sold directly to refining only
operations to be cast into copper anodes.

Figure 16-2:  Copper value chain

Source: CRU

Copper value chain

The following figure shows a simplified version of the copper value chain:

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 245

Figure 16-3:  Simplified Copper value chain

Source: CRU

The primary trading form for copper is copper cathodes.  This refined copper can further be transformed is also traded into various semi-
fabricated products – wire rod, rods, bars and sections, strip, sheet, plate and tubes.  These forms are usually traded at a premium to the
benchmark copper price.  

In addition, intermediate products, such as copper concentrates, copper blister and copper anodes are also traded.  Around 80% of copper
cathode production comes from copper concentrates, with only the remaining 20% coming directly from cathodes produced through the
hydrometallurgical route (leaching & SX/EW).  

Selling cathode is a much different, and simpler, marketing activity compared to selling copper concentrate.   Cathode is a standardised
product, whereas concentrate can vary widely in quality and value.   Pricing for the two products is also different, with concentrate more
prevalently subject to penalties due to impurities and credits due to payable metals such as gold and silver.   Similarly, the logistics
requirements and customers for each product also vary.  Cathodes are often sold to manufacturing customers, meaning semis producers of
wire rod, wire and cable, and can also be sold to traders.  Concentrate, on the other hand, is sold to copper smelters or to traders.

Copper concentrates

The value of copper concentrates is determined by a number of factors other than the value of the content of each main metal in the
concentrate.  

As part of the agreements between concentrate sellers and buyers, a percentage of metal payable by the smelter is defined, as well as
Treatment Costs (TCs) and Refining Costs (RCs) for key elements present in the concentrate.  

In most copper concentrate contracts, copper, gold and silver are specified as the only payable metals:

● For copper, typically 96.5-96.75% of the copper content is paid for, subject to a minimum deduction of 1 unit.  However, this might
vary from contract to contract and many contracts specify a sliding scale, so that the higher the copper content, the higher the
percentage paid for.  

● For gold and silver, a sliding scale is applied, with payables normally going from 90% to 98.25% for gold and 90% to 95% for silver
subject to a minimum deduction of 1 g/t concentrate in case of gold, and 30-50 g/t concentrate in case of silver.  

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 246

Treatment and refining charges for copper concentrates include a TC expressed in US$/dmt of concentrates and a RC expressed in US$
cents/lb of copper.  For gold and silver content, a RC is considered, expressed in US$/troy ounce.  

When it comes to penalties, there are a number of elements that routinely qualify for penalties if they are present above a fairly low level in
copper concentrates.  These elements include arsenic, bismuth, antimony, mercury, lead, fluorine and chlorine.  Other elements may also
incur penalties, though only at higher concentrations.  They include zinc, nickel, cobalt, silica, alumina and tellurium.  If present in significant
quantities, they may affect the recovery of copper or cause problems during smelting and refining.  Finally, penalties may be payable or the
material may only be suitable for blending if certain element fall below fixed thresholds.  Most particularly this is true for sulphur and iron,
where there is a minimum ration of copper to sulphur and iron that makes the material suitable for smelting.

Copper market balance and price

The following price forecast represents CRU’s forecast as of April 2021.

Global refined copper demand is expected to grow from 23.9 Mt in 2021, to 26.5 Mt in 2026 at a 2.14% CAGR.  This 2.6 Mt increase in
consumption will be partially driven by the post Covid-19 pandemic economic recovery, but also by the increasing penetration of electric
vehicles and renewable energies.  On the other hand, refined copper supply is expected to reach a bit under 26.5 Mt in 2026, close to 2.6 Mt
up from the 23.9 Mt produced in 2021, growing at a 2.07% CAGR during this period.  At the same time, committed mine supply will peak in
2024 at 22.7 Mt, up from 21.3 Mt in 2021, and then go back down to 21.4 Mt in 2026 due to the lack of committed projects in the pipeline.
 Ultimately, copper nominal prices are expected to temporarily decrease from 9,315 US$/t in 2021, to 8,222 US$/t in 2024 as refined copper
supply outpaces demand within this period.  After 2024, CRU expects prices to climb back up to 9,308 US$/t in 2026, supported by the
increasing copper demand coming from EVs and renewable energies, coupled with the previously mentioned lack of committed mine
projects.

Figure 16-4: Copper supply-demand gap analysis, 2021 - 2036, kt

Source: CRU
Coming from a strong 4.7% year-to-year rebound from 2020 to 2021, refined copper demand growth is

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 247

expected slowdown during the forecast period, hitting y-to-y growths of >2% from 2021 to 2024 and 1.7% from 2025 to 2026, as the effects
of the pandemic wear-off.  At the same time, CRU expects copper demand to grow by 2.6 Mt in the next five years, reaching 26.5 Mt
consumed in 2026, with a particularly strong growth of 3.6% CAGR coming from Asia ex.   China between 2021 and 2026.   During this
period, demand is expected to be driven mainly by the industrial and automotive sector’s recovery, coupled with a rapid penetration of EVs
and renewable energies in the coming years.  On the supply side, refined production will continue to grow strongly, increasing by 2.9% y/y in
2022 and 2023, aided by several smelter projects that are due to start-production in China.  Meanwhile, ex.  China smelter projects will play
a more prominent role from 2024 onwards, namely those in Indonesia and India, with refined supply reaching 26.5 Mt in 2026, from 23.9 Mt
in 2021.  At the same time, committed mine supply is expected to go back to its pre-pandemic y/y growth and peak in 2024 with a production
of ~22.7 Mt, and then drop to 21.4 Mt in 2026, leaving a gap of ~1.8 Mt to be filled by projects currently classified as probable and possible.

As mine supply and smelter capacity recovers, the market balance is expected to go further into surplus up until 2024.  Going forward, this
surplus is expected to turn into deficit in 2026, as production is unable to keep up with demand.

Figure 16-5:  Copper Market Balance 2021 – 2026 (kt)

Source: CRU
The ramping up of new projects during the 2021 – 2024 period and the consequent market surplus are expected to take nominal prices from
9,315 US$/t in 2021 down to 8,222 US$/t in 2024.  After this, the prevailing narrative constructed around the green energy transition and a
prospective lack of new mine supply, which is forecasted move the market into deficit after 2025, is expected to start influencing mediumterm
prices.  As a result, copper price is forecast to swing back up to 8,758 US$/t in 2025, to eventually hit 2021-levels in 2026, reaching 9,308
US$/t in nominal terms.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 248

Figure 16-6:  LME Copper cash prices, 2021-2036 (US$/t)

Source: CRU

Table 16-1:  Copper LME cash prices 2021 – 2036 (US$/t)

Source: CRU

16.1.2 Zinc market

Overview of the zinc market

Zinc – the fourth most widely consumed metal in the world following iron, aluminium and copper – is an excellent anti-corrosion agent and
bonds well with other metals.  It is also moderately reactive and a fair conductor of electricity.  It is well-recognised for its effectiveness in
protecting steel against corrosion by galvanising, and as such this accounts for 60% of total zinc consumption.  Galvanised zinc is widely
used in multiple industrial applications such as automobile bodies, air conditioners and more.   Zinc is also commonly used for alloy
production, as well as chemical uses and battery production.
By end-use sector, construction and transportation add up to ~70% of total demand.  In the transportation sector, the automotive industry
accounts for around 10% of global zinc demand.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 249

Figure 16-7:  Global zinc demand by first-use sector and end-use sector
Source: CRU

In terms of mine production, around 80% of zinc mines are underground, only 8% are open pit mines and the remaining 12% are a
combination of both.  Zinc ores contain only around 5-15% zinc and need to be concentrated before being processed by smelters.  A typical
zinc concentrate contains 50-62% Zn and other elements such as Pb, S, Fe, SiO2 and silver.   Metallic zinc can be recovered from the
concentrate by using either hydrometallurgical or pyrometallurgical techniques.  Today, over 90% of zinc is produced hydrometallurgically in
electrolytic plants.

Figure 16-8:  Zinc value chain

Source: CRU

Zinc value chain

The following figure shows a simplified version of the zinc value chain:

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 250

Figure 16-9:  Simplified zinc value chain

Source: CRU
Mine production accounts for the vast majority of refined zinc supply.  In 2020, ~89% of the refined zinc was produced from concentrates.

Zinc concentrates are an intermediate product in the production of refined zinc, and typically contain 50-62% zinc.  In addition, concentrates
may contain economic levels of gold and silver which can be recovered during the smelting process and are therefore typically paid for by
the smelter.  Recovery rates depend on the smelter setup but, given that lead smelters are able to reach high recovery rates for silver, it is
often the case that the silver-lead residue is captured and then processed at a sister lead smelter.   This means that payables are not
necessarily linked to recoveries in the zinc smelter itself, but that residue processing and transportation costs are taken into account when
negotiating them.

Metallic zinc can be recovered from the concentrate by using either hydrometallurgical or pyrometallurgical techniques.  Today over 90% of
zinc is produced hydrometallurgically in electrolytic plants.  The pyrometallurgical process is a less common type of metallurgical process.

The majority of zinc producers are not fully integrated from mine to finished product.  As a result, zinc concentrates are widely traded by
mines to smelters, often through a merchant.

Zinc concentrate

The miner usually gets paid certain percentage of zinc, gold and silver contents in the concentrates sold:

● The industry-standard zinc payable formula states that the buyer will pay for a certain proportion of the contained zinc, typically 85%,
subject to a minimum deduction levied on the overall grade of the zinc concentrate.  This minimum deduction typically stands at eight
units (or eight percentage points).  A well-run modern smelter will now recover between 90-99% of the zinc content of its feed.  The
remaining “free zinc” the smelter gets becomes part of the smelter's expected revenue from a purchase of concentrates.

● In most occurrences, zinc concentrates have a naturally low gold content.   However, given the high value of gold units, these are
attractive to recovered even at low levels, with recovery rates varying depending on the smelter.  Typically, payable terms range between
70-80% of the gold content with a minimum deduction of 1g Au per tonne of concentrate with no RC.

● Silver is a relatively common occurrence in zinc deposits, and if present in sufficient quantities, will be payable in a zinc concentrate
contract.  However, fewer zinc smelters can recover silver as easily or effectively as smelters of other metals, hence less silver is paid
for in a typical zinc concentrate contract than other concentrates.  Silver in zinc

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 251

concentrate is usually subject to a 3 troy ounce deduction (93.3 g/t) and then a 70% payability.

In addition to the main payable metals above, indium can be paid by some smelters if it is present in high quantities.  However, this happens
in rare occasions, and it is usually recovered by the smelters but not paid to the miner.

Zinc concentrates all contain a host of other elements, and some of these can create operational difficulties for smelters and refineries.
 Actual penalties will vary according to the ability of the specific smelter to handle each impurity.  Typical elements which receive penalties
when above certain thresholds include arsenic, bismuth, antimony, mercury, fluorine and magnesium.

Zinc concentrates are also subject to a treatment charge (TC).   The spot TC market is almost entirely constituted of China, whereas
negotiations in the European market are mainly negotiated on an annual contract basis.  Hence, benchmark price for China is spot TC, while
for Europe is annual TC.

In Western markets, it is also common to find price participation clauses.  These represent a form of profit-sharing between the smelter and
the miner, such that depending on the LME zinc price, then the TC on the zinc concentrate is adjusted by an escalator to transfer some of
the price risk to the smelter.  Chinese smelters usually do not apply price participation clauses, meaning that there is a fixed TC charge for
Chinese smelters to process concentrates, and this is not affected by the prevailing zinc price.

Zinc market balance and price

The following price forecast represents CRU’s forecast as of April 2021.

The global refined zinc market was in deficit with demand exceeding supply in most of the years between 2015 and 2019.   The only
exception was 2015 when the market was in high surplus due to a demand depression driven by a slowdown of industrial production,
automotive and construction sectors, together with a moderate growth (~3.6% y/y) of refined zinc production.  This relatively tight market
supported an environment of rising prices between 2015 and 2018, with prices going from US$1,928 to US$2,922 per tonne.   With a
reduced refined zinc market deficit, an accumulation of concentrate market surplus and the exit of bullish investors, LME zinc cash prices fell
dramatically to US$2,546/t in 2019.CRU estimates that the market has moved from a moderate deficit of -235 kt Zn in 2019 to a
considerable surplus of 536 kt Zn in 2020, driving prices down to US$2,267/t.

Going forward, global smelter output growth is expected to slow but refined zinc surpluses will continue to build, as demand growth is
expected to remain lackluster.  The cumulative refined surplus is expected to continue to increase to 2025, the majority of which will be in the
world ex.  China.  Although prices are expected to increase in 2021, the overall surplus in the following five years will result in lower prices,
with the average annual price expected to reach US$1,955/ t in 2025 in nominal terms.

In the long term, CRU expects smelting capacity will be able to support the demand for primary zinc, as new smelting capacity can come on
stream relatively easily if the market requires it.  Mined zinc supply will therefore be the bottleneck to global zinc market growth, and prices
will need to

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 252

adjust in order to incentivize investment into new mining capacity.  Based on the supply-demand gap expected at a mine level, new mining
projects will be needed from 2026 forward.

Figure 16-10:  Zinc supply-demand gap analysis, 2021 - 2036, k

Source: CRU

Figure 16-11:  Zinc Market Balance 2021 – 2026 (kt)

Source: CRU
Smelter disruption affected the supply sector in a transversal way in 2021.  Refined supply was supplemented by the release of zinc stocks,
but an outperforming demand growth mainly in Europe and the USA, and a weak response from the supply-side, led to a tightly refined
surplus of 60 kt in 2021, pressing prices up to $3,033 /t.   CRU expects the global refined market to switch to deficit in 2022 and 2023,
generating supportive fundamentals for the metal price increase, but returning to surplus from 2024 onwards.   Thereafter, CRU expects
prices to fall deep against a backdrop of cumulative surpluses to bring the market back to a sensible balance, hitting its lowest point in 2025,
equivalent to $2,134 /t.  Nevertheless, prices will need to correct to rebalance the market, pushing prices up again in 2026, leaping up to
$2,348 /t.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 253

Figure 16-12:  LME zinc cash prices, 2021-2036 (US$/t)

Source: CRU

Table 16-2:  Zinc LME cash prices 2021 – 2036 (US$/t)

Source: CRU

16.1.3 Lead & silver markets

Overview of the lead market

Historically, lead was used in a wide variety of applications, but these have narrowed in time due to technological advances as well as
environmental & health pressures.   Currently, lead consumption has become dominated by its application in lead-acid batteries (LABs),
which accounts for ~85% of total lead consumption.

The greater portion of lead consumed in the battery sector is dedicated to SLI Batteries (Starting, Lighting and Ignition), which are mostly
found in cars and motorcycles.   Going forward, both production of new vehicles (or OE, Original Equipment) and replacement of failed
batteries in existing vehicles are important demand drivers.  These are followed by industrial batteries, accounting for nearly a third of lead
demand.  The rest is for non-battery uses including submarine cables, some chemicals and radiation shielding.  Lead’s incorporation into
paint, petrol, solders, galvanising alloys and other less relevant uses is fast disappearing.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 254

Figure 16-13:  Lead demand by end-use sector

Source: CRU
On the supply side, due to the polymetallic nature of most lead mines, lead production is significantly impacted by the production of other
metals. The main minerals where lead is found often contain silver, zinc, and copper, and commercial ores can have a lead content from 2%
to >20%.

Figure 16-14:  Lead industrial value chain

Source: CRU

Lead value chain

Lead is normally found as an accessory mineral within the ores of other base metals such as zinc, silver, copper and sometimes gold.  Due
to the polymetallic nature of the vast majority of lead mines, production is significantly impacted by the production of other metals, in
particular by that of zinc and silver.  Indeed, in many of these mines, lead is the by-product, or at least not the main focus of mining.

The following figure shows the value chain for lead production:

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 255

Figure 16-15:  Simplified lead value chain

Source: CRU
Most of lead supply is obtained from recycled material, accounting for 63-65% of total production.

The remaining ~35% of lead supply comes from mine production, specifically from concentrates containing lead.   The concentrate is an
intermediate product generated when the more diluted lead content of the mined ore is beneficiated at a concentrate plant.   Lead
concentrates can have a lead content of up to 50% Pb and are sold by mines directly to lead smelters or to traders.

Lead concentrate

Unlike other types of concentrate, estimating the specifications of a ‘typical’ lead concentrate is difficult due to the wide range of lead
concentrate qualities produced at individual mines and the differing preferences of smelters to treat the array of material being offered by the
market.

On the mine supply side, there is a clear split between higher volumes of more complex ‘high-silver’ lead concentrates and a much scarcer
flow of ‘low-silver’ lead concentrates.

On the concentrate demand side, most smelters have some ability to recover silver, though it typically comes down to the payment terms in
order to make it sufficiently attractive to process such material.  This is particularly important for Chinese smelters, where Chinese silver
prices are lower than international prices.  Though this discourages them from treating ‘high-silver’ feed, Chinese smelters will still continue
to buy ‘high-silver’ concentrates because ‘low-silver’ concentrates are in short supply.   They will also strive for terms that reflect the
associated tighter margins of treating such material.  As a result, lead concentrates attract different treatment charges (TCs) depending on
whether they are catalogued as low-silver or high-silver concentrates.  For TC purposes, a ‘high-silver’ lead concentrate has ~3,100g/t of
silver and ~70% lead content, while a ‘low-silver’ concentrate has less than 400g/t of silver and ~65% lead content.

It is also common to find price participation clauses in lead concentrate sales.  These represent a form of profit-sharing between the smelter
and the miner, such that depending on the LME lead price, then the TC on the lead concentrate is adjusted by an escalator to transfer some
of the price risk to the smelter.   It is usually the case that contracts for ‘low-silver’ lead concentrates include price participation, whereas
‘high-silver’ terms usually do not include price participation.  Terms for concentrates with a silver content between 400 and 3,100g/t vary as
they can follow either structure and, as the case with all concentrates regarding of their silver content, the structure of the final contract is
ultimately the result of negotiations between parties and there are no rules set in stone.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 256

When it comes to metal payables, payable terms do not discriminate based on silver content.  Regardless of the silver content, the payable
stays the same for main payable materials of lead, gold and silver:
● Modern smelters are quite efficient.  A typical smelter recovers around 97% of the lead.  Hence, the lead payable terms are high at
95% of the concentrate content subject to a minimum deduction of 3%.
● Silver is usually the second most valuable material in the lead concentrate.   The terms are 95% payable, subject to minimum
deduction of 30g/t with RCs applied on payable silver content.  RCs can vary depending on silver content and market conditions and
have fluctuated between US$0.6-1.5/oz in later years.
● Gold is less often found with lead-zinc deposits.   Having said that, typical terms consider a 95% payable, subject to minimum
deduction of 1g/t with RCs applied on payable gold content.  RCs are relatively standard at US$5.0/oz.

In addition to the main payable metals above, lead concentrates all contain a host of other elements, and some of these can create
operational difficulties for smelters and refineries.  Actual penalties will vary according to the ability of the specific smelter to handle each
impurity.   Some typical elements which could attract penalties when above certain thresholds include arsenic (penalised when levels are
above 0.1%), mercury (penalised when levels are above 15ppm), bismuth (penalised when levels are above 0.02%) and antimony
(penalised when levels are above 0.3%).

Lead market balance and price

The following price forecast represents CRU’s forecast as of May 2021.

The global refined lead market moved steadily from a small surplus of only ~20 kt in 2015 to a deficit of 113 kt in 2018 and a slightly lower
deficit of 72kt in 2019.   From a price perspective, there was a downward correction in 2015 to reflect a relatively high stock level, before
lifting to US$2,317/t in 2017 owing to tight concentrate and refined lead markets.  Lead prices continued to stay high at US$2,242/t in 2018
but fell to US$2,000/t in 2019, primarily due to the breakdown of US-Chinese trade talks and the return of further import tariff hikes.

CRU estimates the refined lead market saw a global surplus of 91 kt in 2020 as demand decreased more than production in the midst of the
Covid-19 pandemic.  As a result, prices dropped significantly to US$1,826 /t.

In 2021, CRU expects another year of surplus – both demand and supply are expected to pick up from 2020 levels, but consumption is still
expected to lag slightly behind supply.  The shrinking surplus in 2021 heralds a change towards 2025, one of a re-tightening path. The key
dynamic at play will be a greater slowdown in primary than in secondary production growth.  This will trigger overall production growth to
slow by more than consumption growth, thus moving the global market back into deficit in 2023-2025.  As a result of these changes, CRU
expects an LME lead cash price recovery from US$1,980/t in 2022 to US$2,240/t in 2025.

In the long term, lead will continue to be weighed down in investors’ eyes by a lack of a compelling positive narrative in the 2020s, not least
relative to other ‘battery’ metals like lithium, cobalt and nickel in the vehicle electrification story.   We believe that lead’s tarnished image
among the investment community is somewhat misplaced, given its current and future dominant role in most battery sectors and impressive
‘green’ recycling record.  Yet the very success of lead recycling will perhaps act as a drag on lead prices, with this ‘closed loop’ resulting in
smaller market imbalances ahead compared to other more primary supply-driven metals like copper.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 257

Figure 16-16:  Lead supply-demand gap analysis, 2021 - 2036, kt

Source: CRU

Figure 16-17:  Lead Market Balance 2021 – 2026 (kt)

Source: CRU
The market surplus generated coming out of the Covid-19 pandemic is expected to slow down the upwards price trend that has been taking
place since early 2020 and, consequently, nominal price is expected to hit 2,271 US$/t in 2022 before dropping to 2,239 US$/t in 2023.  After
2023, prices are forecast to rise as the World’s refined lead demand progressively outpaces production going to 2026.  Subsequently, as this
imbalance turns into deficit, prices are expected to hit 2,391 US$/t by the end of the forecasted period.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 258

Figure 16-18:  LME cash lead prices 2021 – 2036, US$/t

Source: CRU

Table 16-3:  Lead LME cash prices 2021 – 2036, US$/t

Source: CRU

Overview of the silver market

Silver is often compared to gold given its ancient usage in jewellery and coinage, which now account for 30% and 8% of silver demand
respectively.   The main distinction between both markets is that silver has more extensive uses in industrial applications, with
electrical/electronic uses accounting for 23% of demand.  Like gold, silver is used in electronics for its excellent electrical conductivity, lack of
corrosion, and ease of mechanical use – but given its lower price point and higher availability, it sees far more widespread usage than gold
in this area.

Figure 16-19:  Silver demand b end-use

Source: CRU
In terms of supply, mined silver makes up ~80% of this total silver production, with recycled silver scrap accounting for the rest.
 Furthermore, only 25% of mined silver comes from mine which

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 259

produce silver as their primary metal, while the remainder of mined supply is produced as a by-product from polymetallic mines that may
also produce zinc, lead, or copper.  Because of this, the silver market is highly diversified with the top eight producers only making up less
than 30% of global mined supply.

Figure 16-20:  Silver value chain

Source: CRU

Silver market balance and price

The following price forecast represents CRU’s forecast as of March 2021.

The silver market is currently going through a phase of rapid market rebalancing as it shifts from a period of deficit from 2016 to 2019, to a
surplus in 2020 and forward.  With the Covid-19 pandemic, fabrication demand was hit harder than supply, which resulted in a small surplus
for the year.  Both supply and demand are expected to rebound in 2021, bringing the market back into a deficit.  In the medium term, the
market is expected to remain relatively well balanced, alternating between years of surplus and undersupply.  Demand is expected to peak in
2024 as increases in the jewellery sector – the main end use for silver –are not enough to offset dwindling demand from other end uses, and
the market is expected to see an increasing surplus into the long term.

On the price side, and similarly to gold, silver prices do not tend toward equilibrium like other commodities.  Instead, price is often linked to
sentiment rather than fundamental market forces.  Since 2015, prices have been relatively stable, ranging between US$16 and US$17 per
troy ounce between 2015 and 2019.   The uncertainly brought by Covid-19 pushed prices up to US$20 /oz in 2020.   This tendency is
expected to continue out to 2025, when prices are expected to peak at US$34 /oz.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 260

Figure 16-21:  Silver supply-demand gap analysis, 2021 - 2036, kt

Source: CRU

Figure 16-22:  Silver Market Balance 2021 – 2026 (kt)

Source: CRU
Rising uncertainty about the strength of the post-pandemic global economic recovery will keep reining in growth in industrial demand.  This,
combined with a robust recovery in metal supply, will reduce the fundamental deficit, leading to a more balanced silver market in 2022-2023.
  CRU does not expect to see a sustainable return in buying interest towards this precious metal until late 2022 with the nominal annual
average silver price dropping from $25.1/oz in 2021 to $23.3/oz in 2022.  Starting from 2023, market fundamentals will start to retighten as
industrial demand for silver (ex-coins) fully recovers from the pandemic shock and mine supply weakens driven by grades degradation,
reserves exhaustion and mine closures.  This will spark a resumption of the silver bull rally and pushing nominal prices all the way up to
$31.1/oz in 2026.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 261

Figure 16-23:  Silver price forecast, 2015 – 2036, US$/oz

Source: CRU

Table 16-4:  Silver prices 2021 - 2036, US$/oz

Source: CRU

16.2 El Brocal products

16.2.1 Summary of El Brocal products

The following tables summarizes the main specifications of each concentrate produced by El Brocal:

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 262

Table 16-5:  Typical specifications of El Brocal’s concentrates

Source: Buenaventura

This section aims to assess and compare El Brocal’s products to other players in the industry.  This is done by showing where each product
stands when compared to estimated specification from a large sample of mines.  The figures presented show the minimum and maximum
content of each element under analysis in the samples of mines used, as well as the median and the distribution around it segmented in
quartiles in the following way:

Figure 16-24:  Figure Sample boxplot

Source: Buenaventura

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 263

16.2.2 Cu concentrate
El Brocal is the only mine of Buenaventura that produces copper concentrate.  To compare it against other industry players, a sample of 337
mines from CRU’s Copper Cost Model (out of which 110 are located in Latin America) was used to compare copper grade specifications,
considering data from 2015 to 2019.  At the same time, a sample of 238 mines was used to compare gold and silver content in copper
concentrate, excluding those copper concentrates with no gold or silver content from the original sample.

Figure 16-25:  Copper concentrate of El Brocal mine

Source: CRU

In 2019, Buenaventura produced ~43 kt Cu contained in concentrates.   The company does not have smelting capacity to process the
material, hence it needs to sell the product to the market.
Global smelting capacity in 2019 was 24 Mt of copper per year.   Copper concentrates are mostly sold to Asia, where most of smelting
capacity is located.  Approximately ~40% of copper smelting capacity can be found in China, followed by Japan (~7% of global smelting
capacity) and South Korea (~3% of global smelting capacity).  Outside Asia, other relevant location is Europe, which has 16% of smelting
capacity worldwide.   The Americas account for 15% of smelting capacity, while Africa accounts for a relatively minor amount of global
capacity at ~6%.
Some of the major Asian companies have bought stakes in copper mines to secure long-term feedstock material and fulfil domestic demand
needs for the material.  After excluding copper concentrate flows based on equity interests, the remaining smelter capacity available to
purchase copper concentrates from the custom market is estimated at 5.5 Mt Cu.
Buenaventura’s copper concentrate has substantial payable metal content.   It has high copper and silver, with reasonable gold content.
 However, the product has very high arsenic content.  With arsenic levels of 6.5-9.5%, this would make selling the concentrate directly to
smelters almost impossible, as they would have to extensively blend the product to reach a more generally acceptable level of 0.2% As
content (although certain smelters are capable of processing higher levels).

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 264

Blending is a relatively simple physical process of mixing different products into a new homogeneous concentrate.  This process is used
particularly for low-grade and complex material.   In places like Peru with considerable production of variable material, it is a common
practice.
Buenaventura’s copper concentrate from El Brocal has three potential outlets:

1. Being blended to lower arsenic content to acceptable levels, to later be sold to the customs market or to specific smelters.  Since access
to low-arsenic material is needed, this operation is carried out by traders with access to enough low-arsenic copper concentrates in
Peru.  Given the high levels of arsenic in El Brocal’s copper concentrate and the large amount of material needed to bring arsenic levels
down to acceptable levels, only small volumes of El Brocal’s concentrate ends up being blended.

2. Given the high amount of arsenic present in the concentrate and the presence of both gold and silver, small amounts of this concentrate
can be blended with precious metals concentrates.  Since precious metals concentrates can be imported into China regardless of their
arsenic content, this is an option to open up this market to this particular concentrate.

3. As blending becomes increasingly impractical, mines like El Brocal depend on specialist smelters that can handle this material.  Outside
of China, only one copper smelter in the world is capable of processing large volumes of ultra-high arsenic copper concentrates for the
custom market: Tsumeb smelter in Namibia.

Given that El Brocal’s copper concentrate has levels of arsenic which make the concentrate difficult for smelters to process and for traders to
position in the market, this translates into a high penalty, which is reflected in Buenaventura’s past contracts.   However, even with its
difficulties, the concentrate is ultimately sold to players in the industry who have experience handling it.  Looking forward, Buenaventura has
contracts in place securing sales for 100%, 75% and 15% of the copper concentrate production coming from El Brocal in 2022, 2023 and
2024, respectively.   Buenaventura has long-standing relationships with these buyers, and it is likely that conversations with them will be
ongoing in order to continue to position this concentrate in the market.

16.2.3 Zn concentrate

The following charts show El Brocal’s zinc, gold and silver content in their zinc concentrate when compared to a sample of mines from CRU’s
Zinc and Lead Cost Model, looking at data between 2015 and 2019.  A sample of 229 mines (out of which 60 are located in Latin America)
was used to evaluate standard zinc content in concentrates across the industry, while gold and silver content was evaluated using smaller
samples of 63 and 166 mines, respectively.

Figure 16-26:  Zn concentrate of El Brocal mine

Source: CRU

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 265

Note: Three mines have an Ag grade of over 1,200g/t. They were omitted for graphic purposes
Buenaventura does not have smelting capacity to process the material, and therefore needs to sell the product to the market.
Total smelting capacity in 2019 was ~15 Mt of zinc per year.  Zinc concentrates are mostly sold to Asia, where most of smelting capacity is
located.  Approximately ~44% of zinc smelting capacity can be found in China, followed by South Korea (~7% of global smelting capacity)
and Japan (~4% of global smelting capacity).  Outside Asia, other relevant location is Europe, which concentrates 17% of smelting capacity
worldwide.  Central and South America account for ~4% of smelting capacity, with smelters in Peru and Brazil.  Peru has two zinc smelters,
La Oroya and Cajamarquilla, with Cajamarquilla being the seventh largest zinc smelter in the world in terms of processing capacity.
Most of the zinc smelters in the world are not integrated.  According to our estimates, the customs market volume is estimated to be ~7Mt of
zinc concentrates.
Non-integrated smelters are located in all the major zinc consuming regions.  Having said that there are some zinc smelters that are located
inland such as CIS smelters, which makes them unattractive choice for processing.  In Europe and North America, there are smelters that
will be more likely to buy concentrates from nearby mines.  Nevertheless, there are still smelters that will accept concentrates from overseas
mines.  The largest customs market is likely to be located in Asia, where there are Japanese, South Korean and Chinese smelters which will
operate in the customs market.
Buenaventura’s zinc concentrate from El Brocal has a relatively standard zinc content and high silver content.   This is one of the least
complex products in Buenaventura’s portfolio and is generally regarded as a product that is versatile and has no problem finding a market.
 Although the high humidity of the concentrate is the only small element of concern, this does not have an impact on payability.   Going
forward, Buenaventura has contracts in place with standard buyers committing 82% of El Brocal’s zinc concentrate production in 2022, and
21% in 2023.  The business relationship with these buyers is ongoing and negotiations are expected to continue to take place in the future.

16.2.4 Pb concentrate

The following charts show El Brocal’s lead, gold and silver content in their lead concentrate when compared to a sample of mines from
CRU’s Zinc & Lead Cost Model, looking at data between 2015 and 2019.  A sample of 191 mines (out of which 57 are located in Latin
America) was used to evaluate standard lead content in concentrates across the industry, while gold and silver content was evaluated using
smaller samples of 54 and 179 mines, respectively.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 266

Figure 16-27:  Pb concentrate of El Brocal mine

Source: CRU
The lead market is highly reliant on the secondary market to provide the vast majority of refined lead.   From 11.8 Mt of refined lead
production in 2020, just 4.3 Mt of refined lead came directly from lead mines, equivalent to 37% of production.

Around two thirds of mined lead is produced in China.  China does not export any concentrate and remains a substantial importer of lead
concentrates, importing around ~700kt of lead contained in concentrates every year.  Outside of China, the size of smelter’s custom market
purchases is equivalent to ~800 kt Pb contained concentrates annually, which translates into a total custom market for lead concentrates of
~1.5 Mt Pb.  In terms of quality preference, most Chinese smelters are not overly interested in processing lead concentrates with high silver
because of the silver price arbitrage.  The silver price in China is usually lower than international LBMA prices, and a prospective Chinese
smelter would have to pay in LBMA terms when buying the concentrate and receive the local price when selling.  Notably, there are a few
lead smelters which have government permits in place that allow them to process the silver and export it, avoiding price arbitrage in the
process.  However, this can be done only if the concentrate being imported into China falls under the silver concentrate category.  Although
the smelters which have the necessary permits to process silver concentrates and then export them are only a few in number, they are
relatively large in terms of capacity.

El Brocal’s lead concentrate has a relatively low lead content, with silver content on the higher side.   With arsenic content at ~0.4% and
taking into consideration the deposit’s overall arsenic levels, arsenic content could lead to the concentrate being blended during certain
periods of time.  However, this should not present an issue for traders and buyers with experience in this area and, overall, El Brocal’s lead
concentrate is regarded as a good quality concentrate which does not present challenges when blending.  Going forward, Buenaventura has
contracts in place securing sales for 48% of El Brocal’s lead concentrate production in 2022 and 11% of expected production for 2023.  The
business relationship with these buyers is ongoing and it is likely that negotiations will continue to take place in the future.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 267

17 Environmental Studies, Permitting, and Plans, Negotiations, or

Agreements with Local Individuals or Groups
According to Peruvian law, any activity that can cause significant negative environmental impacts must be evaluated prior to execution.  A
set of commitments about what to do, as well as not to do, is generated to prevent said impacts or to mitigate, remedy, or compensate the
same.   When the environmental study is approved, commitments become environmental obligations that can be audited, and non-
compliance is sanctionable.

Similarly, the national regulation requires mining companies to make a technical and economic proposals for how intervened areas will be
rehabilitated to ensure compatibility with the surrounding ecosystem once mining activity ends.  This report refers to the Mine Closure Plan
(MCP), which is executed during the useful life (progressive closure), and at the end of operations (final closure and post-closure).

The aforementioned management instruments also consider approaches for adequate social relations.   Regulations require the mining
owner to have a "Social Management Plan", i.e., a set of "strategies, programs, projects, and social impact management measures to be
adopted to prevent, mitigate, control, compensate, or avoid negative social impacts and to optimize the positive social impacts of the mining
project in their respective areas of social influence." The Social Management Plan is approved as part of the EIAd.

In addition to the commitments that may be established in the Social Management Plan, derived from the social impacts related to project
implementation, it is important to note that there are also social commitments that derive from compliance with the "Principles of Social
Management" to which all mine owners must adhere, and which are not necessarily related to the social impacts of the project, but are
equally enforceable.  

In addition to the above, the national regulatory framework requires other permits of a sectorial nature as conditions for the commencement
and development of mining activities (permits from the Ministry of Energy and Mines), such as for the use of other natural resources,
protection of natural heritage or culture, among others.

Below, we report on the performance of the Colquijirca MU regarding the aspects described above, pointing out the problems identified, if
applicable.  

17.1 Environmental Study Results

Activities at Colquijirca were initially subject to an Environmental Adjustment and Management Program (PAMA), which was the primary
environmental management instrument in place when the mine began operations.  Subsequently, several preventive environmental studies
were approved for various areas of the mining activity, as well as amendments to the same (either through amendments, Supporting
Technical Reports -STR-, or prior communications).  

SRK has confirmed that the Colquijirca Unit’s PAMA was approved by the regulatory authority in 2002.  Subsequently, that mine received
approval for several EIAs for different components and expansions of the operation (2001, 2004, 2008, 2011, 2014; amendments to these
studies (2012); and complied with minor or environmentally non-significant variations of the STR (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021) as well
as with elements of prior communications.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 268

Additionally, SRK has observed that the unit took advantage of all the opportunities provided by the regulation to regularize some
components or activities that at the time may not have been covered by the aforementioned environmental studies.  This was the case with
the approval of a Detailed Technical Report (2017), and currently, a Detailed Environmental Plan (PAD) under evaluation.

After reviewing the descriptive scope of the documents identified above, SRK has concluded that the main activities and components for
mining and beneficiation at Colquijirca MU have obtained statutory Environmental Certifications.   SRK has come to the same conclusion
regarding the ancillary components of the mine.  

17.2 Project permitting requirements, the status of any permit applications, and any known
requirements to post performance or reclamation bonds

17.2.1 Other permits required by other sectoral authorities. 1

SRK found that Colquijirca MU possesses permits beyond the environmental and sectoral permits mentioned above.  These authorizations
are of utmost importance to the development of mining activities, and include:

a) For the use of water resources

The unit has water use rights to meet its operational needs, both for human consumption (DWTP in the Colquijirca and Huaraucaca areas;
staff camp, Camp's Pavilion G, Huaraucaca offices, etc.) and for industrial mining purposes.

The water uses licenses to which SRK had access show the following water sources: Angascancha Lake; turbined water from the
Jupayragra hydroelectric plant; the Smelter cavern; and the Pun Run Lake.

b) For discharge into water resources

The mine owner declares that “discharges occur solely at WWTPi, Huaraucaca DWWTP, and Jupayragra Power Plant”, which are covered
by the corresponding authorizations, such as Directorial Resolution No.  187-2019-ANA-DCERH dated November 13, 2019, which extends
the validity for 3 additional years (until August 7, 2022); Directorial Resolution No.  010-2021-ANA-DCERH dated January 28, 2021, which
extends the discharge authorization for 3 additional years computed from August 4, 2020 (until August 4, 2023); and the energy water
discharge authorization, granted by Directorial Resolution No.   1909-2005-DIGESA-SA dated December 16, 2005.   This discharge
authorization remains in force given that on the date it was granted, the regulation established that its term would be indicated in the
resolution, and no such term was established.

1The access provided by Sociedad Minera El Brocal to this information was very limited. Most of the information gathered for this section was obtained through the
online institutional websites of administrative authorities in Peru.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 269

c) For Drinking Water Treatment Plants

Regulations require that the water provided for human consumption meet specific conditions for quality.  To this end, DWTPs must have the
corresponding sanitary authorization for the water treatment system.   SRK verified that said authorization has been obtained for the
Colquijirca mining camp and the Huaraucaca mining camp DWTPs.

d) For the installation and operation of septic tanks

SRK has also verified that the mine received sanitary authorization for septic tanks and land infiltration in 2011.

e) For the protection of cultural heritage

SRK verified that the operation possesses a Certificate of Non-existence of Archaeological Remains for the Colquijirca Unit, Huachuacaja
area, and Marcapunta

17.2.2 Mining operating permits issued by sectoral mining authorities.

a) For mining and ancillary activities

From the review of available documents, SRK was able to corroborate that the Colquijirca MU has mining rights for its mining and ancillary
activities and possesses the corresponding operating permit from the mining authority.

Mining rights are grouped in the Acumulación Pariachuccho, as per Resolution No.  02362-2004-INACC/J, with an extension of 2,179.1378
hectares.

Colquijirca MU began work years back, when no “authorization to start mining activities” was required.  The mine has, however, obtained the
necessary permits to intervene in new areas or to resume activities in previously intervened areas.   An example of the latter is the
Marcapunta Norte Mine, where activities resumed in 2008.  

In addition, SRK has reviewed documentation to verify the company’s compliance with requirements to communicate mining plans for the
years 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021.  

b) For beneficiation and ancillary activities

SRK’s review of available documents corroborates that the Colquijirca MU has the corresponding permits to develop its mining beneficiation
activities.

The "Huaraucaca" beneficiation concession was approved by Directorial Resolution No.  143/83.  Subsequently, extensions, amendments,
and communications have been processed as required by the regulations in force at each opportunity.

Over time, the processing capacity of the Huaraucaca beneficiation plant has gone from 1000 MT/day (1991) to the current capacity of
21,600 MT/day, as authorized by the Mining Technical Report (2016) that raised the expansion of the previously installed capacity by 18,000
MT/day, approved by Resolution No.  0562-2016-MEM-DGM/V and supported by Report No.  275-2016-MEM-DGM-DTM-/PB.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 270

17.3 Mine closure plans, including remediation and reclamation plans, and associated costs2

Colquijirca MU's activities comply with the legal requirement of having presented measures for the progressive, final, and post-closure of its
existing and planned components.   Thus, the approval of an initial MCP in 2009 has been corroborated, as well as its update in 2012,
modification in 2016, and a second update in 2019.

SRK has verified that semiannual reports for the years 2018, 2019, and 2020 have been submitted to authorities and that said reports
provide details on progressive compliance with the MCP.  

It should be noted that the schedule of closure activities included in the MCPs, or their amendments must be met to avoid administrative
sanctions and triggering financial guarantees if progressive closure budgets are not executed.  

From the information contained in the Semiannual Mine Closure Plan Compliance Reports, SRK has concluded that the following
progressive closure works are potentially delayed or non-compliant with respect to the approved Mine Closure Plan:

● Unish waste dump physical and geochemical stability works - Planned as a closure activity for the first half of 2020.
● Santa Maria waste dump physical and geochemical stability works - Planned as a closure activity for 2021.
● Drilling rig disassembly, physical stability, and geochemical stability works (74) - Closure completed in 2020.
● Livestock Improvement Program, Environmental Education & Training Program, and Monitoring Training - Social programs
completed by 2021.

These delays could be justified under the state of health emergency due to COVID -19, declared in Peru by Supreme Decree No.  008-2020-
SA, effective March 12, 2020.

17.4 Social relations, commitments, and agreements with individuals and local groups.

The area of direct social influence is made up of the communities of Huaraucaca, Villa de Pasco, Santa Rosa de Colquijirca, Smelter,
Ucrucancha, Vicco, and the community of Colquijirca in the district of Tinyahuarco, whose main activity is urban-rural trade, basically with the
MU, to which they provide services.  On a much smaller scale, some communities engage in livestock farming.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2020 and 2021 Social Management Plans as well as the Programs and sub-programs of the current
Environmental Management Instruments (IGA) have

2For the preparation of this report, verification of compliance with environmental obligations, including mine closure measures, was performed at documentary level
only.   In our experience, documentary verification of compliance with environmental obligations is very limited, because many areas and components that could
generate potential environmental contingencies or problems are not mentioned in any official document, and often there are no documentary references to them.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 271

been rethought and executed and are recorded in the Mining Unit's follow-up or monitoring matrix of commitments and obligations.  This
matrix has been reviewed for this analysis.

The objective of the programs and sub-programs is to strengthen the mining unit's ties with the community population and local authorities
for a sustainable relationship that will allow for future acquisition of land for mining operations by strengthening social relations and the
company's reputation.   In this regard, the company seeks to improve its relationship by addressing the demands for housing repairs in
Colquijirca, response to complaints and claims, and compliance with the framework agreement and replacement works.  

The current social management plan of Colquijirca Mining Unit - El Brocal - BUENAVENTURA S.A.A.  includes instruments in place prior to
the unit’s acquisition in 2018, but some goals have been rescheduled due COVID-19 and to reflect the company’s desire to strengthen social
relations by fulfilling obligations and commitments acquired with the population of the area of interest and direct/indirect influence.  When
Corporación Buenaventura purchased El Brocal, it assumed commitments made by the previous owners to ensure that good social
relationships are obtained.  

Of the 45 obligations reviewed, 73% have been executed within the time and budget allocated prior ot the initiation of the progressive
closure stage.  Slight delays in execution are attributable to COVID-19 restrictions and social distancing requirements, which impeded the
execution of a number of social initiatives.  To avoid contagion, participatory training and monitoring, for example, could not be conducted;
this is reflected in the weighted progress.  

The COVID-19 context has weakened community relations and the ADSI and AISI have been unable to conduct planned visits to the
community.   It is clear that the Social Affairs Area of the mining unit requires more support to implement its strategy, which seeks to
strengthen and improve community relations to lay the groundwork to acquire land or areas of interest to expand the Colquijirca mining
operation down the line.  

In general, Colquijirca Mining Unit - El Brocal - BUENAVENTURA S.A.A., complied with the practice of reporting on the social components in
accordance with regulation SK-1300.

17.5 Mine Reclamation and Closure

17.5.1 Closure Planning

El Brocal’s closure plan has been approved by the mining authority, which deemed that all corresponding regulatory requirements had been
met.  Although this plan is fairly detailed, most of the proposed plan does not comply with CDC and ICMM Guidelines.  SRK is of the opinion
that most of the actions proposed have been defined at the conceptual level given that detailed engineering has yet to be performed.
  Nevertheless, the objective of this technical memo is not to describe components and closure activities in detail.   The general closure
actions for the project components that pose the greatest risks and represent the largest costs are summarized below.   Closure of other
facilities, such as civil infrastructure, demolition of structures and buildings, quarries and landfills are considered in the closure plan, but are
not addressed herein.  

Closure actions proposed in the closure plans for the key facilities are summarized below and some aspects are discussed in more detail in
the following sections.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 272

Underground Openings

The operation includes eight portals, and thirty-three shafts.  The closure action for the portals is to construct a reinforced concrete bulkhead
with varying thicknesses (1.5 to 6.5 meters approximately) depending on the type of portal, filled with waste material until surface.

The shaft openings will be closed with a concrete cap, which will be covered with low permeability and revegetated.  Hydraulic plugs are
proposed for some the underground openings, based on the 5 failure modes criteria.  These openings are: (1) Unish, (2) Santa María, (3)
Tajo Sur, (4) North Marcapunta (also called Main Ramp), and (5) Negative ramp.

All structures associated with the underground openings will be demolished and dismantled.

Waste Rock Dumps

All mine waste rock dumps (WRD) will be reclaimed during operation, as part of progressive closure activities.   The only WRD that will
remain after closure is Condorcayán WRD.

The proposed closure actions for the waste rock dumps include construction of diversion channels, placement of a low permeability cover
and revegetation.  Slopes will remain at angle of over (~1. 75H:1V), which is considered stable for the height of the dump (27m).

The locations of the topsoil stockpiles will be regraded and revegetated after the topsoil is used for closure of other areas of the site.  

Tailings Impoundments

SMEB has two tailings storage facilities: (1) Huaraucaca and (2) Huachuacaja deposits.

Huaraucaca deposit is formed by the conjunction of 7 different deposits (deposits N°1 to 7).  Deposit N°7 was built over deposits N°3 and
N°5; and deposit N°4 is proposed to be mined through conventional excavation as well as hydraulic mining.  The tailings generated through
this process are considered to be deposited on Huachuacaja deposit.  This deposit is going to be closed as part of progressive actions.

The proposed closure actions for this deposit include placement of a low permeability cover and revegetation, and the construction of
contact water diversion channels.   Current perimetral diversion channels are considered to be kept for closure.   Slopes will remain at an
angle of over (~1.87H:1.0V), which may vary over the different section of the deposit.

Huachuacaja deposit is conceived as a conventional deposit supported by a main dam constructed with different types of materials (zoned
dam).  This deposit will be closed as part of the final closure.  Closure activities for this deposit include placement of an impermeable cover
(geomembrane + 0.3m gravel + 0.15m topsoil) and revegetation, tailings impoundment profiling towards out of the deposit, and diversion
system constructed over the cover, composed by a main and secondary channel that will discharge to two ponds and later to the creek.

All structures associated with the tailing’s deposits will be demolished and dismantled.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 273

Progressive Closure

Included in the closure plan for El Brocal is a commitment to progressively close activities or facilities as they are no longer needed for
operations.  To date, the following facilities have been, or are planned to be progressively closed in advance of final closure.

● Four portals: (1) Unish, (2) Santa María, (3) Borgez, and (4) Gregorio.
● Thirty-three shafts.
● Six Waste Rock Dumps: (1) Condorcayán, (2) South, (3) Unish, (4) Santa María, (5) Borgez and (6) San Gregorio WRD.
● One tailings deposit: (1) Huaraucaca deposit.
● North pit (also called Mercedez pit).
● Concentrator plant N°1.
● Two drinkable water treatment plants: (1) Colquijirca, (2) and Huaraucaca plants.
● Three topsoil deposits: (1) Huachuacaja, (2) Huaraucaca, and (3) Colquijirca 1 deposits.
● Tailing’s thickener plant.
● Two hydroelectrical plants (old facilities): (1) Río Blanco, and (2) Jupauragra plants.
● Underground powder keg.

17.5.2 Closure Cost Estimate

The estimated closure cost has been based on the approved closure plan and the results of the additional physical and chemical stability
studies performed by SRK during this project.   SRK has prepared revised closure cost estimate incorporating the relevant gaps and an
update a number of closure activities.  Therefore, this chapter describes cost associated and a comparison between the estimate and the
approved closure plan of El Brocal.  

SRK focused the closure cost update to focus on the most significant cost components, which comprise approximately 80 percent of the total
existing or updated costs.  This analysis reviewed and, as necessary, updated quantities and unit costs based on the existing information
and SRK’s experience.

The analysis of the most significant closure activities was developed based on an update of the productivities and unit prices related to the
labor, equipment and material.  This analysis and update was based on published cost data.Peruvian Chamber of Construction CAPECO (in
its Spanish acronym)  and internal SRK data from similar projects.  

In updating the closure costs, SRK made the assumptions due to limited information available.

● The MTO are preserved from the approved closure plan  

● In cases where the estimated unit prices were updated and represent a lower price than the approved closure plan, SRK
conservatively used the unit price presented in the closure plan.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 274

Table 17-1:  UM El Brocal closure cost comparison

Description Closure Plan Update Closure Cost
Percentage
-2020 -2021
Progressive Progressive Progressive
Closure Final Closure Closure Final Closure Closure Final Closure

(USD) (USD) (USD) (USD) (%) (%)

Direct cost 72,002,191 14,204,968 134,468,482 19,061,588 87% 34%
Indirect cost 18,000,548 3,551,242 14,739,148 8,709,855 -18% 142%

Contingency (1) 3,600,110 710,248 22,381,145 4,165,716 - -

Total (without
93,602,849 18,466,458 171,588,775 31,937,159 83% 73%
Taxes)

Source: SRK

(1) Contingency estimated as: 5% of direct costs on current closure plan, and 15% on SRK’s updated costs.

Post-Closure Costs

Post-closure activities were presented in the approved closure plan.  SRK, through is experience and internal data base has updated the
cost related to monitoring and maintenance five years.  SRK updated these costs based on professional experience and internal databases
but did not increase the length of the monitoring and maintenance period.  The results are presented in the following Table 17-2.

Table 17-2:  post-closure approved closure plan and update (2021)

Approved
Update Closure
Closure Plan Percentage
Cost (2021)
Type Description (2020)
(USD) (USD) (%)
  Physical Maintenance 44,947 60,438 34%
Geochemical Maintenance 35,669 60,438 69%
Hydrological Maintenance 35,669 36,916 3%
Biological Maintenance 35,669 52,885 48%
Monitoring Physical Stability & Air Quality Monitoring 81,976 81,976 0%
Geochemical Stability Monitoring 25,887 25,949 0%
Hydrological Stability Monitoring 25,887 25,887 0%
Biological Stability Monitoring 25,887 33,089 28%
Social Monitoring 116,090 126,950 9%
Direct Cost 427,681 504,528 18%
Indirect cost 106,920 266,413 149%
Contingency 21,384 115,641 441%
Total (without Taxes) 555,985 886,582 59%
Source: SRK

(1) Contingency estimated as: 5% of direct costs on current closure plan, and 15% on SRK’s updated costs.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 275

17.5.3 Limitations on the Current Closure Plan and Cost Estimate

Limited information was available in the approved closure plan and cost estimate regarding closure material quantities and how they were
calculated.  Because of the limited information available, particularly the lack of details as to how those costs were calculated basis for the
unit rates, SRK cannot validate the cost estimate in the approved closure plan.

However, in order to assess the impact of changes in unit prices, SRK used the quantities and key parameters (e.g., topsoil haul distances
and cover material thicknesses) that were included in the approved closure plan and assumptions where details were absent, and applied
current unit rates for labor, equipment, and materials to those quantities.  For example, the cost to excavate, haul and place low permeability
cover material did not indicate how far the material would be hauled.   In this case, we used published and internal equipment and labor
rates, and estimated an average haul distance to update the cost.

Afterward the identification of the geographic aspect and coefficient related that are key to discover the unified prices for the estimate
(September 2021).  The variant factor is the divergence between the unified prices recently updated and the closure plan (March 2020).
 Then the mentioned unified rates will be multiplied by an influence percentage that is weighed by importance.  Finally, the average factor is
calculated has a summary of every activity.  For El Brocal, the resulting average factor is 1.30.

17.5.4 Material Omissions from the Closure Plan and Cost Estimate

Based on our review of the available data, SRK has observations with respect to predicting and designing closure actions to manage the
long-term physical stability of the site.   The results of the stability analyses indicated that all analyzed slope configurations satisfied the
minimum static and pseudostatic FOS criteria set in the study (static FOS=1.5; pseudostatic FOS = 1.0).   SRK makes the following
observations with respect to the available stability analyses:

● In most cases the established seismic loading and stability criteria satisfy Peruvian national regulations and are typically accepted
for studies using operating-basis earthquake loading but should be reviewed and revised depending on the guidelines Buenaventura
decides to adhere to in demonstrating long-term closure stabilization.
● Buenaventura should demonstrate the ability to revegetate and maintain slopes at 1.7H:1V for long-term closure conditions or allow
for regrading to a flatter and more erosionally stable configuration.  
● The stability analyses completed to date consider different seismic accelerations, each of which appear to satisfy current Peruvian
national regulations, but none of which satisfy the passive-closure recommendations in the Global Industry Standard on Tailings
Management.  If Buenaventura decides to comply with this relatively new standard, additional design and stabilization work will be
required to ensure the facilities meet the seismic criteria of the GISTM, possibly including the construction of compacted fill
buttresses to increase embankment stability under 1/10,000-year seismic loading.   At the very least, a consistent approach to
determining and applying the seismic hazard across the site should be developed and applied to all proposed closure configurations
to facilitate a consistent approach to closure stabilization design.
● Slopes to be covered should be analyzed using the infinite slope method to demonstrate long-term closure stability of the cover
layer.
● Records of tailings and waste rock dump seepage were not available.  Phreatic conditions within the TSFs and WRDs are generally
unknown and should be modelled for the closure

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 276

configuration to facilitate accurate stability analyses and predictions of long-term draindown flows.  
● Geochemical characterization of tailings and waste rock was also not available but should be developed to facilitate long-term water
quality modeling to inform the short and long-term.  

Based on a review of the closure plan and costing associated with cover soil acquisition and placement, SRK makes the following
observations:

· There are three topsoil stockpiles identified, but there is no sitewide cover and borrow material balance to show which facilities need
cover and how much.  

· The proposed TSF cover includes placement of a 15cm thick layer on top of geotextile over geomembrane.  It is extremely difficult to
place a layer of soil this thin consistently over large areas and will be even more difficult over a geomembrane without damaging the
liner.  Required drain rock volumes should be adjusted to accommodate a minimum thickness of 15 or 20 cm (as applicable) with
some portion of the layer placed thicker, and placement costs should envision the use of small low-ground-pressure equipment.

· Waste rock dump and tailings embankment slopes are unlikely to be sufficiently stable, particularly against erosion, for long-term
closure conditions.  

Based on our review of the available geochemistry data, SRK has observations with respect to predicting and designing closure actions to
manage the long-term chemical stability of the site and potential impacts to the surrounding environment, specifically downstream water
resources.
· There is currently no post-closure water balance or predictions of future water quality at El Brocal.   These are required to fully
determine the nature of water treatment required post-closure.  SRK have made high-level predictions of flows, that have a level of
uncertainty.

· The site climatic conditions, the available water quality data, and fact that the site currently treats water prior to discharge indicates
that water treatment will be required after closure to meet downstream water quality objectives.   Based on data reviewed SRK
anticipate that even with the closure actions proposed, including covers on mine waste facilities, untreated discharge water from the
site will result in continued exceedances of the applicable standards.  

· Water treatment is currently carried out at the site and comprises of HDS. Because water is treated operationally, SRK’s experience
indicates that water treatment would also likely be required post-closure.  Although detailed geochemical analysis has not been
conducted and predictive numerical calculations have not been produced to determine future water quality predictions, the nature of
the geology and mine waste materials at El Brocal indicate that acid rock drainage and metal leaching (ARDML) is likely to be an
issue post-closure.   Available geochemistry results indicate that the majority of waste rock is non-PAG although in contrast the
majority of the tailings is classified as PAG.  Satellite imagery from site indicate visual impacts of ARDML for the open pit and TSF.

Water Treatment Capital Cost

Because post-closure water treatment was omitted from the current closure cost and SRK has determined that the available data indicate
that this will be required, SRK has prepared a high-level estimate of the capital costs to utilize the existing HDS water treatment plant during
closure.  For this, SRK have assumed that only an additional filter press will be required.  SRK have also included sustaining Capex costs for
capital upgrades after 5 years post-closure and beyond, to include maintenance, replacement of parts and likely to reduce capacity of the
treatment plant as it will be oversized.  Operating costs are included as a post-closure cost.
The capital cost estimate includes only the addition of a filter press to the current WTP.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 277

The capital cost estimate (CAPEX) has been prepared by using previously received quotations for the major equipment associated with HDS
plants, scaling these appropriately and adjusting for inflation.   Due to time constraints, no new quotes have been sought as part of this
project.  
Table 17-3:  Water Treatment Capex
HDS WTP
Item
Cost (USD)
Equipment – Filter Press 1,200,000
Sub Total 1,200,000
10% Contractor Profit 120,000
Total 1,320,000
Source: SRK

The sustaining CAPEX has been split into annual values for the first 5 years post-closure and subsequent to this time in perpetuity.  The first
five years of sustaining Capex has been included to make an allowance to make necessary modifications to the existing HDS WTP, including
any repair and maintenance that is required and the downsizing of the facility.  This initial sustaining Capex is estimated at USD 500,000.
 Subsequent to this period, sustaining Capex is estimated to be USD 250,000 annually to cover maintenance, repair and replacement on the
assumption that a design life of 20 years is obtained by the modifications/upgrades at year 5.

Water Treatment Operating Cost

Annual operating costs for the WTP are based on average annual flows that require treatment.   The WTP will be required in perpetuity.
  Table 17-4 provides a combined annual Opex cost that combines both the operation of the WTP, subsequent sludge management, and
sustaining Capex.
Table 17-4:  Total Water Treatment Costs Annual Summary
Item Years 0-3 Years 3-5 Years 6-10 Years Years 14>
11-14

WTP Opex 5,900,000 1,700,000 830,000 500,000 2,400,000

Sludge Mgmt. 3,300 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,650
Sustaining Capex 500,000 500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
Total (US$) 6,403,300 2,200,000 1,081,000 751,000 2,651,650

Source: SRK

17.6 Adequacy of Plans

17.6.1 Environmental

No significant issues have been identified with respect to the Colquijirca MU Mine Closure Plans.  However, the following are some aspects
to which attention should be paid in order to avoid generating contingencies in relation to mine closure:
● Plan in advance the submission of the MCP Update (the next one would be due in 2024).
● Ensure that the commitments made for progressive closure have been fulfilled, otherwise there could be administrative sanctions
(payment of fines) and the requirement to provide a financial guarantee for an amount equivalent to the budget of unfulfilled
progressive closure measures.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 278

17.6.2 Local Individuals and Groups

Of the 45 obligations reviewed, 73% have been executed within the time and budget allocated, before starting the stage of progressive
closure, noting that the slight delay in execution is due to the COVID-19 context and the nature of these imminently social activities.
 Participatory training and monitoring, for example, could not be carried out to avoid the risks of contagion, which has been reflected in the
weighted progress.  
While it is true that this COVID-19 context has weakened community relations due to the lack of visits to the ADSI and AISI, it is also true
that the Social Affairs Area of the mining unit should have more support to implement the strategy developed by the Social Affairs team that
seeks to strengthen and improve community relations, in order to meet future goals of acquisition of land or areas of interest for the
expansion of the Colquijirca mining operation.

17.6.3 Mine Closure

Hydrogeology

● Post-mining simulations should be improved in the next level of studies for an accurate estimate of the main hydrogeological
parameter designs (water levels, groundwater flows and rebound timing).  Transient calibration and sensitivity analysis need to be
included.

Hydrogeology and Stormwater Management

● Fully document the methods and assumptions used in the hydrologic analysis to determine design storm peak flow rates.
● Document the design criteria and how they align with Buenaventura’s chosen final closure criteria (CDA, GISTM, etc.).
● Develop accurate construction costs using local or regional contractors to update the pricing and cost estimate.
● Evaluate the potential for erosion of Huaraucaca TSF embankment slopes bounding the Rio San Juan and the risk of erosion of
slope toes, transport of tailings solids, and potential slope oversteepening and instability.   Develop appropriate designs to ensure
long-term erosional and mass stability under predicted closure conditions.

Cover Design

● A detailed cover and borrow soil material balance should be prepared to determine exactly how much of each material type is
required, where the material will come from, and then each material should be characterized for geotechnical, hydraulic, and
geochemical properties to support infiltration modeling (if necessary), closure water balance development, and chemical modeling.
● Cover costs should be adjusted as necessary to account for the results of the detailed material balance, and the specified source for
each material.

Physical Stability – TSFs and Waste Rock Dump

● Review and revise FOS criteria based on selected guideline for demonstrating long-term closure stabilization.
● Complete sitewide seismic hazard assessment and apply consistently to all slope stability analyses.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 279

● Review and revise closure designs, construction materials, and slope stability analyses to ensure long-term stability of all
construction components.
● Evaluate phreatic conditions within WRDs and TSFs and develop a sitewide water balance model incorporating all predicted flows
and informing the potential need for post-closure water treatment.

Chemical Stability – Geochemistry

The available geochemistry test work data indicates that most of the waste rock at El Brocal is non-PAG.  In contrast, most of the tailing’s
material is indicated to be PAG.  Aerial imagery of the site indicate ARDML impacts in the open pit and TSF.   Collectively, the evidence
suggests a significant potential for ARDML impacts.  This is further supported by that fact that at El Brocal contact waters are treated to
comply with mine discharge permits.
Based on the review of the existing information and identified gaps, SRK have concluded that:
● The lack of inclusion of post-closure water treatment provision in the 2018 CCE is a significant omission.  As water treatment is
required operationally, SRK have assumed that it will be required post-closure.
● As predictions of future water quality and flows (i.e., a water balance) are not available, SRK have assumed that water treatment will
be required in perpetuity, with the chemistry remaining of similar type to that observed operationally.   SRK prepared estimates of
flows for the WRD and TSF to facilitate this work, but these have an associated degree of uncertainty.   BVN have provided
estimates of post-closure flows associated with open pit water decant to the receiving surface water environment
● SRK has proposed continued use of the existing HDS WTP with an allowance for sustaining capex for maintenance, repair and
replacement which will also include downsizing given that the current WTP is oversized for predicted post-closure flows.   To
minimize sludge handling volumes and costs, a filter press is incorporated into the WTP.  This will minimize sludge volumes and
create a more stable sludge, making handing easier.   Sludge generation rates and stability in post closure will become very
important as the minimum area of the TSF will be kept open to receive the sludge.
A number of assumptions have been made in order to develop the conceptual level water treatment cost estimate.  To refine and improve
this cost estimate, SRK recommend that the following work is carried out as soon as possible.
● Geochemical characterization of mine waste materials and subsequent predictive numerical geochemical modelling to determine
likely future water quality associated with the TSF, WRD, the open pit and underground discharges (should future discharges flows
associated with the latter change).   Based on SRK’s review of the available geochemistry information, it is likely that samples of
mine waste material will be required to be submitted for humidity cell test work (HCT) to determine long term metal release rates and
reactivity with time.   Based on SRKs experience of this type of work, it is anticipated that approximate costs for this predictive
numerical modelling would be in the order of US$150,000 - US$200,000 for professional fees, not inclusive of third-party external
disbursements such as analytical test work, borehole drilling, site investigation etc.
● The development of a post-closure water balance that will define the flow rate through time associated with the underground mine,
the open pit, the TSFs and WRDs.  Current numerical groundwater and hydrological models needs to be updated and recalibrated in
order to predict post-closure hydrogeological and hydrological conditions, aiming a more accurate estimates of groundwater flows in
the mine, water levels, and rebound timing to be used in the post-closure water balance.  The cost of the groundwater numerical
simulations would be around US$100,000 to US$125,000.
● Detailed studies to determine the feasibility and costs associated with pumping and gravity feeding water from the TSF to the
existing WTP location.  Preliminary calculations indicate

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 280

that this would be favorable in comparison to building and operating a separate WTP for this facility, but this needs to be fully
determined.
Depending on the results of the above, further assessment of the post-closure treatment options would be required.  Depending on the type
of chemistry and flows predicted this would be expected to cost between US$50,000 - US$150,000 excluding external disbursements such
as analytical test work.  The exact scope of this work cannot be determined, but may include, options appraisals, trade off studies, obtaining
third party vendor costs for active water treatment and the piloting testing of passive water treatment options where appropriate.

Closure Costs

Details of quantities in the estimate were not traceable and the absence of information made it difficult to identify or update.  This should be
improved in the next S-K 1300 update.

· The need for, and the cost estimate of water treatment plants should be assessed in more detail in future studies, to better
understand and optimize closure activities regarding water management.

· Material balance for covers should be reviewed.  Material source’s location and cover material characterization should be developed
and identified, to optimize placement costs and to improve their accuracies.

· Once the closure and post-closure activities are reviewed and updated in the closure plan, the requirements and length of time
needed for post-closure monitoring and maintenance should be revised to accommodate those changes.

17.7 Commitments to Ensure Local Procurement and Hiring

Several programs and objectives with commitments to hire local labor and purchase or acquisition of local suppliers were reviewed from
sources such as the current environmental management instruments (IGAs).

17.7.1 Commitments to ensure the hiring of local labor

● As part of Amendment of the Environmental Impact Study of the project “Construction of tailings deposits No.   6 and No.   7 -
Regrowth and Expansion of Integrated Deposit No.  7:
Local Employment Program.  Subprogram: Recruitment of local labor.  Current status 100% executed.  The budget is within the HR area
who have the “Ruwana” contract in their costs.
● Amendment of the Environmental Impact Study of the Expansion of Operations Project to 18,000 TMD:
Local Employment Program.  Recruitment of local labor from Santa Rosa de Colquijirca communities.  100% executed.
● Environmental Impact Study of the North and South Marcapunta Mine:
Recruitment of local labor from Santa Rosa de Colquijirca communities.  100% executed.  

17.7.2 Commitments to ensure local procurement

● As part of the Amendment of the Environmental Impact Study of the project “Construction of tailings deposits No.  6 and No.  7 -
Regrowth and Expansion of Integrated Deposit No.  7:
Program for the acquisition of local products.  Which aim to:
o Maximize opportunities to purchase products at the local and regional level.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 281

o Minimize local expectations in reference to potential local purchases of products, adjusting expectations to the existing local and
regional offer, maintaining competitive prices.
o It does not have a specific budget; purchases are made by the warehouse area.
● Amendment of the Environmental Impact Study of the Expansion of Operations Project to 18,000 TMD:

Clearly explain to the community stakeholders the level of additional demand that the company will generate, as well as the duration of this
demand and the possible subcontractors that will be in charge of these community purchases.  100% executed.

No further information about results of hiring local people or local procurement were found.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 282

18 Capital and Operating Costs

Estimation of capital and operating costs is inherently a forward-looking exercise. These estimates rely upon a range of assumptions and
forecasts that are subject to change depending upon macroeconomic conditions, operating strategy and new data collected through future
operations. For this report, capital and operating costs are estimated at PFS-level with a targeted accuracy of +/-25%.   However, this
accuracy level is only applicable to the base case operating scenario and forward-looking assumptions outlined in this report. Therefore,
changes in these forward-looking assumptions can result in capital and operating costs that deviate more than 25% from the costs forecast
herein.
SRK has reviewed and analyzed the following aspects:
● Historical operating costs from 2018 to 2020, including a detailed analysis of the cost database and compilation of costs for forecast
estimation;
● Projected capital cost for the LOM of El Brocal, including sustaining CAPEX

18.1 Capital and Operating Cost Estimates

18.1.1 Operating Costs

The forecast LoM operating unit costs are summarized in Table 18-1.
A contingency of 10% was considered for the operating cost to cover any unpredictable factor or variation in the future cost with regard to
the historical cost used for forecast estimation.
Table 18-1:  Operating cost estimate

Forecast Forecast cost *

Item ** Units
Cost

(Inc. 10% Contingency)

Mining Open Pit      
Waste US$ / t waste 1.70 1.87
Ore US$ / t ore 2.11 2.32
Mining Underground      
R&P Primary US$ / t ore 25.34 27.88
R&P Remanent US$ / t ore 26.50 29.15
R&P Pillar Recov US$ / t ore 26.66 29.33
SLS US$ / t ore 28.64 31.51
Plant Processing      
Plant 1 (Cu) US$ / t processed 15.88 17.47
Plant 2 (PbZn) US$ / t processed 14.80 16.28
G&A Mine Operations US$ / t processed 6.22 6.84
Sustaining CAPEX      
Mining US$ / t ore 1.25 1.38
Processing US$ / t processed 2.08 2.29
Off Site Cost (Corporate) *** M US$ / year 8.14 8.14
Other costs      
Incremental cost **** US$ / bench - t rock 0.010 0.011
Voids research ***** US$ / t rock 6.85 6.85
Source: Buenaventura

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 283

* Some items, depending on cost type, do not include a contingency

** Estimation does not include selling expenses and some commercial costs stated by the contract with the trader. These costs are included
directly in the Cashflow
*** Average forecast corporate cost (2022-2032) attributable to El Brocal mining unit
**** Estimated for a bench height of 6 m
***** cost is applied only to blocks adjacent to zones with the potential existence of voids

18.1.2 Capital Costs

Capital costs were estimated by Buenaventura based on infrastructure and investment requirements for the LoM plan.
A contingency of 15% was considered for the capital cost to cover any unpredictable factor or variation.
Capital costs for the LoM are summarized in Table 18-2. SRK does not have any additional details about the yearly amounts to support or
conduct a detailed analysis on specific infrastructure or components,
Table 18-2:  Capital cost estimation
Capital cost
Year
(M US$)
2022 46.66
2023 40.00
2024 56.90
2025 43.50
2026 24.80
2027 10.50
2028 16.10
2029 21.40
2030 12.00
2031 10.00
2032 7.10
2033 0.00
Total 288.96
Source: Buenaventura

18.1.3 Closure Cost

SRK has developed an estimation cost for the three stages of the closure process and an estimated cost for the water treatment system,
covering the following aspects:
● Progressive closure
● Final Closure
● Post Closure
● Water treatment
A contingency of 15% was considered for the closure cost to cover any unpredictable factor or variation.
The total closure cost distributed up to the year 2053 is 230.75 M US$ (without contingency and selling taxes). The detail of closure cost is
shown in Table 18-3.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 284

Table 18-3:  Closure Cost

Year Progressive closure Final Closure Post Closure Water treatment

Direct Indirect Direct Indirect Direct Indirect Direct Indirect
(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)
(M US$)

2022 11.21 1.23            

2023 11.21 1.23            
2024 11.21 1.23            
2025 11.21 1.23            
2026 11.21 1.23            
2027 11.21 1.23            
2028 11.21 1.23            
2029 11.21 1.23            
2030 11.21 1.23            
2031 11.21 1.23            
2032 11.21 1.23            
2033 11.21 1.23            
2034     3.81 1.74     0.44  
2035     3.81 1.74     0.44  
2036     3.81 1.74     0.44  
2037     3.81 1.74 0.03 0.01   6.40
2038     3.81 1.74 0.03 0.01   6.40
2039         0.03 0.01   6.40
2040         0.03 0.01   6.40
2041         0.03 0.01   2.20
2042         0.03 0.01   2.20
2043         0.03 0.01   1.08
2044         0.03 0.01   1.08
2045         0.03 0.01   1.08
2046         0.03 0.01   1.08
2047         0.03 0.01   1.08
2048         0.03 0.01   0.75
2049         0.03 0.01   0.75
2050         0.03 0.01   0.75
2051         0.03 0.01   0.75
2052         0.03 0.01   2.65
2053         0.03 0.01   2.65
2054         0.03 0.01   2.65
2055         0.03 0.01   2.65
2056         0.03 0.01   2.65
Total 134.47 14.74 19.06 8.71 0.50 0.27 1.32 51.68
Source: Buenaventura

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 285

18.2 Basis and Accuracy Level for Cost Estimates

18.2.1 Basis and Premises for operating cost

According to the Life of Mine (LOoM) plan, future operations will have conditions similar to those found in current operations but some
changes are planned, which have been included in the criteria to estimate operating cost.
The following premises and criteria were considered for the operating cost estimation:
● A 2018-2020 cost database was used for the forecast cost estimation. The cost estimation process began in May 2021, when
information on reported 2021’s costs was not available. At the moment, a comparison between the estimated forecast cost and 2021
results was made resulting in a concordance above 90%;
● Open pit mining in adjacent zones with underground cavities. The block model identifies zones with the potential presence of
underground cavities (from older operations) and assigns an over-cost;
● The progress of open-pit mining is from the northern part of the ore deposit to the southern and moving toward the processing plant
located in the southern extreme of the open pit. In this sense, a decrease is expected in the hauling distance   and will lead the
hauling cost to fall. This aspect was not incorporated in the cost analysis and the hauling cost considered was the same as that
applicable under current conditions;
● An incremental cost was considered for deeper benches.
● Implementation of cemented backfill plant. The operating cost estimation considers an over-cost for the mining methods, which will
use cemented backfill (R&P Pillar recovery, SLS);
● It is assumed that the cemented backfill plant will be available in November 2024 to begin mining of secondary stopes of SLS;
● The current mining operation use contractors and cost estimation considers the same schema;
● Non-inflation rate was considered in the cost estimation;
● There are no royalties applicable to El Brocal mining operaton;
● Exploration costs related to brownfield targets are not included in the operating cost estimation.
Estimated operating costs included:
● Mining cost contractors
● Mining cycle activities (drilling, blasting, loading, hauling and ground support)
● Mine development and preparation adits cost
● Cost of auxiliary services
● Energy (mining, processing plant and facilities)
● Processing plant consumables
● Mine equipment maintenance
● Processing plant equipment maintenance
● Supervision and management

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 286

● Technical services
● Administrative costs (all areas)
● Environmental costs
● Community relations
● Safety
Operational parameters considered for cost estimation are listed in Table 18-4.
Table 18-4:  Operational parameters
Parameters Units Value
Mine production    
Open Pit tpd 9,500
Underground tpd 8,500
Plant Capacity    
Plant 1 (Cu)    
Copper concentrate tpd 10,500
Plant 2 (PbZn) *    
Lead Zinc concentrate tpd 8,000
Copper concentrate tpd 9,500
Stockpile **    
Tonnage Mt 0.20
Pb % 0.54
Zn % 1.48
Ag oz/t 1.97
Cu % 0.37
Au g/t 0.01
Source: Buenaventura
* Plant 2 will be acconditionated to process Copper ores
** Measured at December 31st, 2021

18.2.2 Basis and Premises for capital cost

According to references from Buenaventura the estimated capital cost included:

● Mine support facilities and utilities;
● Backfill plant;
● Process plant sustaining investments;
● Tailings storage facilities (growth or elevation increase);
● Waste dump construction;
● Site support facilities and utilities;
● Site power distribution;
● Camps.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 287

19 Economic Analysis

19.1 General Description

SRK prepared a cash flow model to evaluate El Brocal’s ore reserves on a real basis. This model was prepared on an annual basis from the
effective date of mineral reserve estimation to the effective date project for the exhaustion of mineral reserves. This section presents the
main assumptions used in the cash flow model and the resulting indicative economics. The model results are presented in U.S. dollars
(US$), unless otherwise stated.
Technical and cost information is presented on a 100% basis to assist the reader in developing a clear view of the fundamentals of the
operation. Buenaventura's attributable portion of Mineral Resources and reserves is 61%.
As with the capital and operating cost forecasts, the economic analysis is inherently a forward-looking exercise. These estimates rely upon a
range of assumptions and forecasts that are subject to change depending upon macroeconomic conditions, operating strategy and new data
collected through future operations.
According rules S-K 1300, all inputs to the economic analysis are at the minimum of a pre-feasibility level of confidence and have an
accuracy level of ±25% and a contingency range below 15%.
Mineral Resources The financial analysis is based on an after-tax discount rate of 7.77%. All costs and prices are in unescalated
“real” dollars expressed as Real US$ 2021.  The currency used to document the cash flow is US$.

19.1.1 Financial Model Parameters

Key criteria used in the analysis are presented throughout this section.  Financial model parameters are summarized in Table 19-1.
Table 19-1:  Financial Model Parameters

Item Value
TEM Time Zero Start Date January 1st, 2022
Mine Life 11
Discount Rate 7.77%
Source: Buenaventura, SRK

The model continues after the 11th year to includes the whole closure cost in the cash flow analysis.
Buenaventura set a discount rate of 7.77%.

19.1.2 External Factors

Exchange Rates
El Brocal’s operations are located in the central Andes of Peru. The official currency in Peru is the “Peruvian Sol”. However, in accordance
with typical practices in the Peruvian mining industry, most of the payments for services, consumables and others are made directly in US
dollars (US$). Only a minor portion of payments is made in local currency (for example, salaries or some independent services).
An official exchange rate is announced daily by the Peruvian Central Bank. The exchange rate in the last ten years has shown remarkable
stability.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 288

The operating and capital costs are modeled directly in US Dollar (US$)

Metal Prices
Modeled prices are based on the prices developed by CRU Group in the Market Study section of this report. CRU Group developed two
metal prices set options, “Nominal USD” and “Real 2021 US$”.
The financial model is based on Real 2021 US$ set price.
Table 19-2:  Metal Prices forecast

Metal Units Projected Metal Prices

2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Cu US$/t 9,010 8,201 7,752 8,104 8,448 8,244
Zn US$/t 3,490 3,095 2,604 1,975 2,131 2,197
Pb US$/t 2,227 2,152 2,155 2,163 2,170 2,152
Au US$/oz 1,740 1,660 1,580 1,630 1,715 1,677
Ag US$/oz 22.90 23.40 24.20 25.90 28.20 27.30

Metal Units Projected Metal Prices

2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033
Cu US$/t 8,041 7,838 7,634 7,431 7,450 7,469
Zn US$/t 2,264 2,330 2,397 2,463 2,469 2,475
Pb US$/t 2,135 2,117 2,099 2,081 2,086 2,091
Au US$/oz 1,639 1,603 1,567 1,532 1,498 1,465
Ag US$/oz 26.50 25.60 24.80 24.10 23.30 22.60
Source: CRU Group, February 23th, 2022
* Expressed as Real 2021 US$

Taxes and Royalties

As modeled, the operation is subject to a 29.50% income tax plus a special mining income tax (variable rate).
Tax depreciation depends on the investment type and is calculated annually on a percentage basis; this figure is used to estimate the
income tax payable. Typical depreciation periods used are 5 years, 10 years and LoM.
There are no third party royalties applicable to El Brocal’s operations
SRK notes that the mining units are being evaluated with a corporate structure cost, including the cost of corporate offices located in
Lima.Office costs in Lima are distributed between all managed mining units.
Mining concession holders are obligated to pay a Special Mining Tax (IEM) to exploit metallic Mineral Resources.  For income tax purposes,
the IEM is considered an expense in the same year it is paid.  IEM is determined on a quarterly basis and a percentage is applied to the
quarterly operating profit.
Participation of workers in a profit-sharing scheme is a labor benefit that seeks to boost employee productivity. This charge is set at 8% of
the operation’s profit before taxes.

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 289

Mineral Resources.
Working Capital
The assumptions used for working capital in this analysis are as follows:
● Accounts Receivable (A/R): 30 day delay
● Accounts Payable (A/P): 30 day delay
● Zero opening balance for A/R and A/P

19.1.3 Technical Factors

Mining Profile
The modeled mining profile was developed by Buenaventura in collaboration with SRK. The details of mining profile are outlined earlier in
this report. The modeled profile is presented on a 100% basis in Figure 19-1..

Figure 19-1:  El Brocal Mining profile graphic

Souce: SRK, Buenaventura

A summary of the modeled life of mine mining profile is presented in Table 19-3.
Table 19-3:  El Brocal Mining Summary

LOM Mining Units Value

Total OP Ore Mined Mt 34.79
Total UG Ore Mined Mt 32.48
Total Waste Mined Mt 377.94
Total Material Mined Mt 445.22
LoM Strip Ratio Adim 10.86
Source: SRK

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 290

Processing Profile
The processing profile was developed by Buenaventura in collaboration with SRK.  No blending stockpile was considered in the analysis.
 The modeled profile is presented on a 100% basis in Figure 19-2.  

Figure 19-2:  El Brocal Processing profile graphic

Source: SRK, Buenaventura

Yearly Estimated Costs

Main yearly costs were estimated outside of the Cash Flow template and incorporated to the Cash Flow template as a fixed cost on an
annual basis.
Results for the mining cost, processing cost, and administrative cost estimation on an annual basis are shown in Table-19-4, Table 19-4,
Table 19-5, Table 19-6 and Table 19-7.
Table 19-4:  Reference unit cost for Yearly cost calculation

Rock / Material Plant * Reference Unit Cost **

Mining Proccesing G&A
OP Waste   1.70    
OP Ore PbZn 2.11 15.88 6.22
OP Ore Cu 2.11 14.80 6.22
R&P Primary Cu 25.34 14.80 6.22
R&P Remanent Cu 26.50 14.80 6.22
R&P Pillar Recov Cu 26.66 14.80 6.22
SLS Cu 28.64 14.80 6.22
Source: SRK, Buenaventura

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 291

Table 19-5:  Yearly material movement (tonnage)

Rock / Material Plant * Production Year (Tonnage)

2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
OP Waste   26.8 35.5 50.0 49.9 43.7 43.6 42.5 37.1 33.1 14.4 1.1
OP Ore PbZn 2.1 2.9 2.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2
OP Ore Cu 0.5 0.5 1.3 2.2 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 2.9 2.2
R&P Primary Cu 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.5 1.5 1.9
R&P Remanent Cu 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0
R&P Pillar Recov Cu 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SLS Cu 0.9 0.7 0.7 1.3 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.8 2.2 1.2 1.5
Source: SRK, Buenaventura

Table 19-6:  Yearly incremental (Bench) cost - Ore & Waste

Rock / Material Units Production Year (Yearly Cost)

2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Incremental Cost *** MUS$ 2.28 2.44 2.76 2.70 3.53 4.39 1.69 1.27 3.56 2.77 0.51
Source: Buenaventura, SRK
* Destination of material
** Reference unit cost expressed as US$/t. It does not include a contingency percentage
*** Incremental bench cost expressed as MUS$/year. It was calculated in detail

Table 19-7:  Yearly Cost (No contingency)

Rock / Material Units Production Year (Yearly Cost)

2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Mining Cost MUS$ 131.18 149.40 175.19 180.02 163.69 164.13 158.52 148.49 145.20 109.40 99.57
Processing Cost MUS$ 83.77 97.98 96.18 92.82 90.93 90.93 91.05 90.93 90.93 92.08 87.14
G&A Cost MUS$ 34.25 39.87 39.51 38.67 38.22 38.22 38.27 38.22 38.22 38.49 36.53

Source: Buenaventura, SRK

* Destination of material
** Reference unit cost expressed as US$/t. It does not include a contingency percentage
*** Incremental bench cost expressed as MUS$/year. It was calculated in detail

Table 19-8: Yearly cost (Including contingency 10%)

Rock / Material Units Production Year (Yearly Cost)

2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Mining Cost (Cont) MUS$ 144.30 164.34 192.70 198.02 180.06 180.54 174.38 163.34 159.72 120.34 109.53
Processing Cost (Cont) MUS$ 92.14 107.77 105.80 102.10 100.02 100.02 100.15 100.02 100.02 101.29 95.85
G&A Cost (Cont) MUS$ 37.68 43.85 43.46 42.53 42.04 42.04 42.09 42.04 42.04 42.34 40.18
Source: Buenaventura, SRK
* Destination of material
** Reference unit cost expressed as US$/t. It does not include a contingency percentage
*** Incremental bench cost expressed as MUS$/year. It was calculated in detail

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 292

Corporate costs

Corporate cost, including the cost of administrative office in Lima, was estimated by Buenaventura on a yearly basis. No further detail is
available.

A summary of corporate costs is shown in Table 19-9.

Table 19-9:  Summary of Corporate Costs

Item Units Production Year

2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
G&A Corporate MUS$ 8.6 9.5 10.4 9.2 8.2 8.3 7.9 7.8 6.6 6.8 6.4
Source: Buenaventura

Capital Cost

Capital cost was estimated by Buenaventura in a yearly basis. No further detail is available.

A summary of capital costs is shown in Table 19-10.

Table 19-10:  Yearly capital costs

Item Units Production Year

2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Capital Cost LoM MUS$ 46.7 40.0 56.9 43.5 24.8 10.5 16.1 21.4 12.0 10.0 7.1
Source: Buenaventura, SRK

19.2 Results
The economic analysis metrics are prepared on an annual after-tax basis in US$. The results of the analysis are presented in Table 19-12.
Note that because the mine is operating and valued on a total project basis by treating prior costs as sunk, IRR and payback period analysis
are not relevant metrics.

Indicative economic results are shown in the Table 19-11

Table 19-11:  Indicative Economic Results

Units Value
LoM Cash Flow (Unfinanced)    
Total Net Sales M US$ 4,569.74
Total Operating cost M US$ 3,352.76
Total Operating Income M US$ 293.17
Income Taxes Paid M US$ 32.16
EBITDA    
Free Cash Flow M US$ 991.76
NPV @ 7.77% M US$ 707.72
After Tax    
Free Cash Flow M US$ 320.18
NPV @ 7.77% M US$ 277.03
Source: SRK

May, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 293

Table 19-12:  Cashflow Analysis on an Annualized Basis

Operational Indicators 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Ore Treated 5,506,855 6,409,351 6,352,289 6,216,275 6,144,000 6,144,000 6,152,000
Cu Head Grade (%) 1.64 1.49 1.29 1.37 1.26 1.23 1.23
Pb Head Grade (%) 0.96 1.00 1.52 0.95 - - -
Zn Head Grade (%) 1.65 1.79 2.81 3.02 - - -
Au Head Grade (g/tm) 0.46 0.71 0.59 0.68 0.57 0.81 0.89
Ag Head Grade
1.33 1.56 1.25 0.80 0.26 0.37 0.40
(oz/tm)
Cu Fines (mt) 46,717 48,308 61,060 63,271 67,407 68,192 69,308
Pb Fines (mt) 7,143 13,798 15,369 3,358 0 0 0
Zn Fines (mt) 17,782 27,476 31,663 12,992 0 0 0
Au Fines (oz) 13,368 24,237 19,751 25,353 22,436 27,543 38,612
Ag Fines (oz) 5,305,639 6,787,680 7,237,136 4,894,940 1,619,968 1,827,863 1,260,084
Operating Cost
49.8 49.3 53.8 55.1 52.4 52.5 51.5
(US$/tm)
Mine Cost (US$/tm) 26.2 25.6 30.3 31.9 29.3 29.4 28.3
Plant Cost (US$/tm) 16.7 16.8 16.7 16.4 16.3 16.3 16.3
Services Cost (US$/tm) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8
D&A (US$/tm) 8.5 9.0 10.5 12.9 14.6 14.0 12.7
P&L
Net Sales
- Mine 434,760 480,917 526,147 466,240 419,818 423,977 406,354
- Plant (144,296) (164,342) (192,704) (198,020) (180,062) (180,541) (174,375)
- Services (92,144) (107,773) (105,795) (102,103) (100,024) (100,024) (100,155)
Operating Cost (37,678) (43,853) (43,462) (42,532) (42,037) (42,037) (42,092)
D&A (274,118) (315,968) (341,961) (342,655) (322,124) (322,602) (316,622)
Gross Income (46,868) (57,600) (66,800) (79,887) (89,892) (86,299) (77,982)
Selling Expenses 113,774 107,350 117,386 43,699 7,803 15,076 11,750
G&A (7,160) (8,076) (8,611) (7,319) (7,547) (7,538) (7,660)
Operating Income (8,611) (9,548) (10,376) (9,169) (8,184) (8,266) (7,922)
Royalties 98,003 89,726 98,398 27,211 -7,928 -729 -3,832
FCF (6,701) (6,841) (7,490) (5,207) (4,198) (4,240) (4,064)
EBITDA
Workers Participation
Income Tax 138,169 140,485 157,708 101,891 77,765 81,330 70,086
CAPEX (7,304) (6,631) (7,273) (1,760) - - -
Mine Closure (10,281) (9,138) (10,227) (2,514) - - -
Free Cash Flow (53,659) (46,000) (65,435) (50,025) (28,520) (12,075) (18,515)

Operational Indicators 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035

Ore Treated 6,144,000 6,144,000 6,187,890 5,872,794 - - -
Cu Head Grade (%) 1.14 1.31 1.33 1.20 - - -
Pb Head Grade (%) - - 0.76 0.34 - - -
Zn Head Grade (%) - - 1.98 2.43 - - -
Au Head Grade (g/tm) 1.14 0.86 1.02 0.79 - - -
Ag Head Grade
0.52 0.39 0.66 0.57
(oz/tm) - - -
Cu Fines (mt) 67,539 61,012 61,647 59,236 - - -
Pb Fines (mt) 0 0 1,352 267 - - -
Zn Fines (mt) 0 0 4,898 2,793 - - -
Au Fines (oz) 46,881 35,154 39,022 34,944 - - -
Ag Fines (oz) 1,587,702 1,274,464 2,736,414 2,309,550 - - -
Operating Cost
49.7 49.1 42.7 41.8
(US$/tm) - - -
Mine Cost (US$/tm) 26.6 26.0 19.5 18.7 - - -
Plant Cost (US$/tm) 16.3 16.3 16.4 16.3 - - -
Services Cost (US$/tm) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 - - -
D&A (US$/tm) 11.8 10.5 9.2 9.0 - - -
P&L
Net Sales 398,141 336,739 346,607 330,044 - - -
- Mine (163,340) (159,719) (120,338) (109,526) - - -
- Plant (100,024) (100,024) (101,286) (95,854) - - -
- Services (42,037) (42,037) (42,338) (40,182) - - -
Operating Cost (305,402) (301,781) (263,962) (245,561) - - -
D&A (72,485) (64,320) (57,075) (52,945) - - -
Gross Income 20,254 -29,362 25,570 31,537 - - -
Selling Expenses (7,461) (7,019) (7,085) (6,593) - - -
G&A (7,762) (6,565) (6,757) (6,434) - - -
Operating Income 5,032 -42,946 11,728 18,510 - - -
Royalties (4,082) (3,367) (3,701) (3,671) - - -
FCF
EBITDA 73,435 18,007 65,102 67,785 - - -
Workers Participation (76) - (642) (1,187) - - -
Income Tax - - - - - - -
CAPEX (24,610) (13,800) (11,500) (8,165) - - -
Mine Closure (14,299) (14,299) (14,299) (14,299) (14,299) (8,134) (8,134)
Free Cash Flow 34,450 -10,092 38,661 44,134 (14,299) (8,134) (8,134)
Source: Buenaventura

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 294

19.3 Sensitivity Analysis

SRK performed a sensitivity analysis to determine the relative sensitivity of the operation’s NPV to a number of key parameters. This is accomplished by flexing
each parameter upwards and downwards by 10%. Within the constraints of this analysis, the operation appears to be most sensitive to:  commodity prices,
metallurgical recovery and mining costs assumptions.
SRK cautions that this sensitivity analysis is for informational purposes only and notes that these parameters were flexed in isolation within the model and are
assumed to be uncorrelated; this may not be an accurate reflection of reality. Additionally, the amount of flex in the selected parameters may violate physical or
environmental constraint that are present at the operation.

Figure 19-3:  El Brocal NPV Sensitivity Analysis

Source: SRK, Buenaventura

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 295

20 Adjacent Properties
Colquijirca belongs to the XVII metallogenic belt corresponding to epithermal Au-Ag deposits and polymetallic deposits (INGEMMET, 2021).  Located in the
Cerro de Pasco region, it has a long productive mining history dating back to pre-Inca times.  
One of the main mining units near Colquijirca is Cerro de Pasco unit.
Cerro de Pasco operating unit is located in the Pasco region, approximately 295 km from Lima and with access through the Carretera Central highway.  This
unit consists of three mines: two underground (Paragsha, Vinchos) and one open pit (Raul Rojas).  During 2019, stockpile ore treatment at the Paragsha-San
Expedito plant amounted to 2.1 million tonnes, with grades of 1.89% Zn, 0.63% Pb, and 0.82 oz Ag/MT.  This ore corresponds to the clearing of Raul Rojas pit.
 In 2019, fines production amounted to 17.5 thousand tonnes of zinc, 6.3 thousand tonnes of lead, and 0.79 million ounces of silver compared to the results
obtained in 2018 with 11.2 thousand tonnes of zinc, 3.7 thousand tonnes of lead, and 0.4 million ounces of silver due to higher ore treatment and better head
grades.

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 296

21 Other Relevant Data and Information

This Chapter is not relevant to this Report.

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 297

22 Interpretation and Conclusions

22.1 Geology & Exploration

The mineral deposits of the Colquijirca district belong to a member of the family of porphyry copper (Cu) related deposits known as Cordilleran deposits.  These
types of deposits, which are generally formed in the upper parts of a porphyry Cu, are fundamentally characterized by prominent zoning with internal parts that
are dominated by Cu and external zones where Zn, Pb and Ag are the main economically interesting elements.   In the case of the Colquijirca district, and
specifically the area between the Marcapunta Norte and Colquijirca sectors, such zoning generally consists of three zones, which mineralogically consist
mainly of enargite in the internal parts; chalcopyrite in the intermediate parts; and sphalerite and galena in the external parts (El Brocal, 2021).
According to Bendezú, Fontboté, & Cosca (2003), in the Colquijirca district, the relative sequence of events and the absolute ages obtained establish that
Cordilleran base metal lode and replacements ores, which are mainly epithermal and formed at high-sulfidation and oxidations states, were emplaced
considerably later (~460,000 years) than the Au–(Ag) high-sulfidation epithermal mineralization
Many classic districts known for their epithermal porphyry copper and/or Au- (Ag) deposits may host concentrations of "Cordilleran base metal veins" at any
spatial position upward from the porphyry environment.  These may occur at levels as shallow as the epithermal environment, which in carbonate rocks may be
characterized by fine-grained Zn-Pb mineralization.
SRK notes that the property is not at an early stage of exploration, and that results and interpretation if exploration data is generally supported in more detail by
extensive drilling and active mining exposure of the orebody in pits and underground works.

22.2 QA/QC & Data verification

SRK has conducted a comprehensive review of the available QA/QC data as part of the sample preparation, analysis, and security review.  SRK believes that
the QA/QC protocols are currently consistent with accepted industry best practices.
The insertion of control samples to validate contamination, precision and accuracy of the database has been performed regularly since 2007.  SRK observed
that the rate of standards control samples in drill holes is less than the rate indicated in Buenaventura's protocol.
In SRK's opinion, sample preparation, chemical analysis, quality control, and security procedures at El Brocal have historically shown that there may be issues
with accuracy and precision of results to support the estimation of measured Mineral Resources and proven reserves, especially for areas characterized by
analyses at the El Brocal Internal Laboratory.  Therefore, SRK has considered the QAQC analysis results as a risk in the classification of Mineral Resources
and reduced overall classification accordingly as discussed in Section 11.5.10 of this report.
SRK has noted that the database contains historical information with no laboratory certificates, which means that cross validation could not be performed on
this information.  In SRK's opinion, the remaining information that could be validated is consistent and acceptable for Mineral Resource Estimation.  
SRK has observed that the database has a number of minor findings or inconsistencies, the vast majority of which correspond to historical information obtained
from data migration.  Although a complete reconciliation of the certificate information to the digital database could not be completed,

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 298

SRK notes that most of the current resource is supported by contemporary information that could be compared to information on the original certificate. The
incidence of error for the data that could be compared was limited and deemed immaterial to the disclosure of Mineral Resources.

22.3 Mineral processing

El Brocal’s mineral processing facilities include two independent conventional flotation plants.  Plant 1 processes copper ore while Plant 2 processes lead and
zinc ores.  Plant 1 receives ore from Marcapunta mine, and Plant 2 receives fresh ore from Tajo Norte mine and low silver content ore from Marcapunta. Plant
2 can process copper ores by campaigns, currently a campaign of 30 days by year is implemented in the Plant 2 for treatment of Copper ore.
Data available to SRK covered the period form 2017 until 2020.  Figures for 2020 show a number of anomalies and erratic behavior, which are attributable to
the negative impacts on the industry from unforeseen external factors.  The figures from 2020 figures are, in general, excluded or considered unrepresentative
of normal operations for the purposes of this document.  
El Brocal’s Marcapunta underground mine’s ore production for the period in question shows monthly values ranging from 2.5 to 2.8 million t per year averaging
approximately 1.88% Cu with a minimum of 1.63% Cu and 2.32% Cu maximum.  Arsenic averaged 0.61%, with a minimum of 0.53% and a maximum of
0.75%.  Gold averaged 0.54 g/ton with low of 0.40 g/ton and high of 0.80 g/t.  Copper and iron head grades suggest a slight upward trend that began in 2018;
nevertheless, 2020’s anomalies may be biasing this observation and need to be confirmed with data from future years.   Ninety-three percent (93%) of
Marcapunta’s total production of ore tonness was classified
as copper-silver rich ore and delivered to Plant 1; the balance of approximately 7% fed Plant 2.  Overall, Marcapunta represented only 6% of Plant 2’s total
throughput.
SRK is of the opinion that processing facilities like Plant 1 should operate in the 90% to 95% range, or even higher.  SRK also believes it is in El Brocal’s best
interest to identify bottlenecks in the ore supply end and within Plant 1 itself that are preventing improvements in operating time.  Removing bottlenecks will
lower unit costs; improve overall stability; and allow better control the key operating parameters in the plant.
Plant 1Plant 1SRK requested but was denied historical information regarding arsenic’s impact on the concentrate valuation; therefore, SRK was unable to offer
a supported opinion about the quality of copper concentrates or the suitability of operating practices, including mine planning and processing as well as the
ship ability and saleability of the production.
SRK requested but was denied information related to concentrate sales, including actual invoices.  SRK is unable to confirm that the declared production was
actually sold and that the economic terms used in the planning and estimates are realistic and reliable.  Similarly, the reconciliation analysis between mine and
mill could not be verified.

22.4 Mineral Resource estimates

SRK verified the block model estimations through of different techniques included cross validation, visual inspection of the composites and the block grades,
statistical comparison among composites and block model distributions, and also statistical comparison among estimations obtained with the nearest neighbor
method, through swath plots.
SRK has revised some aspects that can be considered as uncertainties in El Brocal Mineral Resource estimation, which are: The density assigned in the block
model has enough support for

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 299

most of the estimation domains, however, there are some domains that have low data density.  Buenaventura must conduct an additional sampling program in
the next drilling program.  
El Brocal must improve the geological interpretation to increase the confidence on the geological models, which must be supported with the geological
mapping of alterations, mineralization and lithology.  El Brocal structural model is a key and important point towards the southern part in the underground zone.
 
The estimation domains for all the elements must be revised in detail to improve their definition.  There are zones where the model can be improved, especially
in those zones in which the grade interpolation is underestimated locally.  
The resource classification that reflects resource estimation confidence constitutes a key and sensitive aspect of the assessment of El Brocal Mine. Although
the mine has been producing since 2011 and has an extensive drilling program, its level of measured resources is limited due to several factors, such as the
absence of a powerful structural model in the southern zone and low QA/QC performance in some areas of El Brocal.

22.5 Mining methods

El Brocal’s open pit operations has as a production target 9,500 tpd of ore.  Based on this, the LOM has been estimated at 10 years (2022 to 2032) exploiting
26.22 Mt Cu ore (1.67% Cu, 0.71 oz/t Ag y 0.22 g/t Au) and 8.69 Mt Pb/Zn ore (1.06% Pb, 2.13% Zn y 2.85 oz/t Ag
El Brocal’s underground operations has as a production target 8,500 tpd of ore.   Based on this, the LOM has been estimated at 11 years (2022 to 2033)
exploiting 35.74 Mt Cu ore (1.27% Cu, 0.70 oz/t Ag y 0.74 g/t Au)

22.6 Recovery methods

El Brocal operates two independent conventional flotation plants, namely Plant 1 and Plant 2.  Plant 1 processes copper ore from Marcapunta mine to recover
copper minerals to produce copper concentrate.  Plant 2 processes lead and zinc ores, primarily from the Tajo Norte mine, to recover lead and zinc minerals to
produce lead concentrate and zinc concentrate
Plant 1 is a conventional concentration plant and produces copper concentrate. This material transported offsite by dump trucks, and to a lesser extent, by rail
cars, for sale to third parties.  The plant’s unit processes include crushing, grinding, flotation, and thickening.  Final tails are thickened and disposed of in a
conventional tailing’s storage facility.  Final concentrate generated in the flotation stage is thickened, then dewatered before being sent to Callao Port.
In SRK’s experience, a large variability in fresh feed (ore throughput) typically has a negative impact on plant’s performance, which is included but not limited to
the following:
● Poor grinding efficiency and consequently, an increase in steel consumption for steel balls, ball mill liners as well as accelerated wearing in the
classification systems, including slurry pumps.  
● Instability in the flotation feed stream, which leads to low-quality concentrate and undesirable deportment of metals because cross-contamination of
minerals.  
● Incurring in unnecessary operating expenditures in the way maintenance labor and spare parts.  
● Additionally, low grade concentrate translates into commercial terms that fall below the industry benchmark and imply unnecessary handling costs
when using trucks and/or ocean shipping

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 300

SRK requested but was denied of the necessary detailed information to properly support the metallurgical parameters required to estimate Reserves &
Resources.  It is SRK’s opinion that the high content of deleterious elements may translate into a material loss of value for El Brocal’s concentrate.  As such,
the current estimates of the blocks’ value may not accurately represent future economics.
Plant 2 is a conventional, sequential multi-stage concentrator that produces lead and zinc concentrates that are trucked offsite to be sold to third parties.  The
plant’s unit processes include crushing, washing, grinding, and flotation.  Final tails are thickened and disposed of in a conventional tailing’s storage facility.
 Final concentrates are thickened and dewatered before being trucked off site.
Mined ore is re-handled multiple times before being delivered to the mill.  In SRK’s opinion, there are no technical reasons to support rehandling.  Apparently,
this takes reflects a social commitment with surrounding communities.  Additional and unnecessary expenditure is a clear outcome from this practice.  
During the visit to El Brocal facilities, SRK observed a highly unusual and unnecessary number of operators for a maintenance job on a small rod mill.  The
explanation given to SRK was that the number of operators was directly associated with contractual obligations with the union.  
Both Plant 1 and Plant 2 show a high degree of variability in their key performance indicators, which includes tonnes per day (and tonnes per hour) of fresh
feed and grinding P80.  An unstable mill feed is usually a driver of low recovery and poor-quality concentrates.  The mill´s mechanical availability appears to be
driven by regular malfunctioning or upsets mostly from ancillary systems like conveyor and chutes, and not from major process equipment problems.  
Process automation, although present, is not operating to the standards required.  An online metal assaying system for flotation was not working at the time of
the visit, and apparently haven’t operated for a long time.  Typically, unless the operating workforce is well experienced and has a positive attitude towards
continuous improvement, the only tool to maintain and improve metallurgical performance entails measuring key variables.  
In SRK’s opinion, the absence of a system to integrate geological, mining, metallurgical, and commercial data in a suitable geometallurgical model is negatively
impacting El Brocal’s bottom line.  The processing plant will perform at its maximum when fresh feed is within expected parameters for lithology, mineralogy,
alteration and grades.  At this in time, El Brocal seems to consider only parameters for grade.  Additional mechanical issues at the plant are also taking a toll.  
SRK is also of the opinion that given El Brocal’s potentially long mine life, efforts to modernize the flowsheet, particularly for the crushing-grinding stages,
should be assessed.   Currently, the use of small capacity rod mills followed by ball mills is clearly demanding large operating and maintenance crews and
driving low mechanical availability, which jacks up operating expenditures.

22.7 Infrastructure
Rock Waste Management Facility design was developed in 2008 by DCR Ingenieros.  It considered an extension of 205 Ha for a storage volume of 135.7 Mm³
or 240 Mt and an estimated density of 1.8 t/m³ of dumped waste rock.   This storage capacity would cover the life of mine forecasts, which for that year
contemplated a production of 110 Mt of waste rock over a period of 10 years.
The Huachuacaja tailings management facility has been designed to be heightened in eight stages, which correspond to: Stage 1 (4157.5 MASL), Stage 2
(4161.5 MASL), Stage 3 (4167.5 MASL),

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 301

Stage 4 (4173.5 MASL), Stage 5 (4178.5 MASL), Stage 6 (4184.5 MASL), Stage 7 (4193.5 MASL), and Stage 8 (4197.5 MASL).  Heightening is currently up to
Stage 3, having stored 42 Mt of tailings and it is estimated that it can store an accumulated volume of 86 Mt up to Stage 4; 116 Mt up to Stage 5; 164 Mt up to
Stage 6; 242 Mt up to Stage 7; and 266 Mt up to Stage 8 and considers the formation of a tailings beach of 0.  5%; a freeboard of 5 m; an operational pond
volume of 1.0 Mm³; and a probable maximum flood (PMF) volume of 3.8 Mm³, corresponding to a probable maximum of 24-hour rainfall of 229 mm.  The
average dry density of the deposited tailings will be 1.59 t/m³.

22.8 Market studies

Given that El Brocal’s copper concentrate has levels of arsenic that make it difficult for smelters to process and for traders to position in the market, high
penalties are levied, which are reflected in Buenaventura’s past contracts.  However, even with its difficulties, the concentrate is ultimately sold to players in the
industry who have experience handling it.   Going forward, Buenaventura has contracts in place that secure sales for 100%, 75% and 15% of the copper
concentrate production coming from El Brocal in 2022, 2023 and 2024 respectively.  Buenaventura has long-standing relationships with these buyers, and it is
likely that conversations with them will be ongoing in order to continue positioning this concentrate in the market.
Buenaventura’s zinc concentrate from El Brocal has a relatively standard zinc content and high silver content.  This is one of the least complex products in
Buenaventura’s portfolio and is generally regarded as a versatile product that has no problem finding a market.  Although the high humidity of the concentrate
is the only small element of concern, this does not have an impact on payability.  Going forward, Buenaventura has contracts in place with standard buyers
committing 82% of El Brocal’s zinc concentrate production in 2022, and 21% in 2023.  The business relationship with these buyers is ongoing and negotiations
are expected to continue to take place in the future.
El Brocal’s lead concentrate has a relatively low lead content, with silver content on the higher side.   With arsenic content at ~0.4% and taking into
consideration the deposit’s overall arsenic levels, arsenic content could lead to the concentrate being blended during certain periods of time.  However, this
should not present an issue for traders and buyers with experience in this area and, overall, El Brocal’s lead concentrate is seen as a good quality concentrate
that does not present challenges when blending.  Going forward, Buenaventura has contracts in place securing sales for 48% of El Brocal’s lead concentrate
production in 2022 and 11% of expected production for 2023.   The business relationship with these buyers is ongoing and it is likely that negotiations will
continue to take place in the future.

22.9 Environmental studies & Permitting

SRK has confirmed that the Colquijirca Unit’s PAMA was approved by the regulatory authority in 2002.  Subsequently, that mine received approval for several
EIAs for different components and expansions of the operation (2001, 2004, 2008, 2011, 2014, amendments to these studies
(2012); and complied with minor or environmentally non-significant variations of the STR (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021) as well as with elements of prior
communications.  
Additionally, SRK has observed that the unit took advantage of all the opportunities provided by the regulation to regularize some components or activities that
at the time may not have been covered by the environmental studies.  This was the case with the approval of a Detailed Technical Report (2017), and currently,
a Detailed Environmental Plan (PAD) under evaluation.  

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 302

After reviewing the descriptive scope of the documents identified above, SRK has concluded that the main activities and components for mining and
beneficiation at Colquijirca MU have obtained statutory Environmental Certifications.   SRK has come to the same conclusion regarding the ancillary
components of the mine
SRK’s review of available documents corroborates that the Colquijirca MU has the corresponding permits to develop its mining beneficiation activities.  
The "Huaraucaca" beneficiation concession was approved by Directorial Resolution No.   143/83.   Subsequently, extensions, amendments, and
communications have been processed as required by the regulations in force at each opportunity.
SRK has verified that semiannual reports for the years 2018, 2019, and 2020 have been submitted to authorities and that said reports provide details on
progressive compliance with the MCP.  
It should be noted that the schedule of closure activities included in the MCPs, or their amendments, must be met to avoid administrative sanctions and
triggering financial guarantees if progressive closure budgets are not executed.
Limited information was available in the approved closure plan and cost estimate regarding closure material quantities and how they were calculated.  Because
of the limited information available, particularly the lack of details as to how those costs were calculated basis for the unit rates, SRK cannot validate the cost
estimate in the approved closure plan.  
However, in order to assess the impact of changes in unit prices, SRK used the quantities and key parameters (e.g., topsoil haul distances and cover material
thicknesses) that were included in the approved closure plan and assumptions where details were absent, and applied current unit rates for labor, equipment,
and materials to those quantities.  For example, the cost to excavate, haul and place low permeability cover material did not indicate how far the material would
be hauled.  In this case, we used published and internal equipment and labor rates, and estimated an average haul distance to update the cost.  
Next, it is key to identify geographic aspects and determine the coefficient applicable to the set of unified prices used in the estimate (September 2021).  The
variant factor is the divergence between the unified prices recently updated and the closure plan (March 2020).   Then the mentioned unified rates will be
multiplied by an influence percentage that is weighed by importance.  Finally, the average factor is calculated has a summary of every activity.  For El Brocal,
the resulting average factor is 1.30.

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 303

23 Recommendations

23.1 Geological Setting, mineralization and Deposit

● SRK recommends developing a detailed structural model to provide further support to the geologic modeling of the deposit.

23.2 Mineral Resources

● SRK recommends that systematic density sampling programs be carried out covering all ore bodies, adequately distributed along the length and height
of the veins.
● QAQC results throughout the life of the mine have not been optimal. SRK recommends that the quality control program be properly monitored. Internal
laboratory results over the last few months on Au and Cu show accuracy problems and potential problems on Ag. These inappropriate results
generated the non-declaration of measured resources in the southern zone.
● SRK strongly suggests that a feasibility-level structural model be developed throughout the mine, especially in the southern area. Currently, the low
confidence of the structural model means that the southern part does not have measured resources.
● SRK recommends implementing a reconciliation program where the different types of resource models, reserves, mine plans and plant results are
included.

23.3 Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security

SRK recommends frequently analyzing the results of control samples, particularly with regard to the precision and accuracy of the Internal Laboratory and
Certimin External Laboratory, to identify any inconsistencies and provide immediate solutions.

23.4 Data Verification

SRK recommends performing internal validations of the database; conducting periodic verification of the data export process; and issuing Internal Laboratory
analytical certificates for future estimations or audits.

23.5 Mining and Mineral Reserves

● Improvement of metallurgical recovery estimation by means of a continuous performance control of plant operations and development of additional
metallurgical tests. SRK considers that current formulas are coherent with the processing plants and represent the results of the process, however, it is
necessary to complete additional analysis.
● Develop a definition of metallurgical recovery schema for ore materials that can produce a bulk concentrate (Cu, Pb, Ag) and incorporate it as part of
mineral reserves estimation.
● Improvement of “unit value” calculation by means the parameters traceability and adding some level of differentiation in the commercial terms,
separating commercial terms related to the metal or payable content and commercial terms related to mass of concentrate
● Improve the predictability of Arsenic contents in the saleable products.
● Geotechnical monitoring of open pit slopes and implement feedback process to incorporate the monitoring results to the geotechnical model used for
pit design purposes
● Implement a reconciliation process, following best practices of the industry. This process must be consider the involvement of areas: mine operations,
geology, mine planning and processing plant under an structured plan of implementation;

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 304

23.6 Environmental, Permitting, and Social Considerations

Achieve the goals programmed in the social management plan that were pending due to the Covid 19 restrictions.

23.7 Capital and Operating Costs

● Development of additional technical studies related to the mine closure process, for improving the accuracy of cost estimation. SRK considers that
there are opportunities to improve and reduce the closure costs supported by technical studies;
● Continuo monitoring of cost results (yearly, quarterly) and use these results for feedback on the operating and capital cost estimation;
● Complete the studies for the cemented backfill and based on that, update the capital cost requirements.
● Develop a detailed cost estimation for the production of bulk concentrate.

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 305

24 References
Baumgartner, R., Fontboté, L., & Vennemann, T. (2007). Mineral Zoning and Geochemistry of Epithermal Polymetallic Zn-Pb-Ag-Cu-Bi Mineralization at Cerro de
Pasco, Peru. Society of Economic Geologists, Inc., 493–537.

Bendezú, R., & Fontboté, L. (2002). UNIVERSITÉ DE GENÈVE - FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES, SECTION DES SCIENCES DE LA TERRE. Obtenido de Late timing for
high sulfidation cordilleran base metal lode and replacement deposits in porphyry-related districts: the case of Colquijirca, central Peru:
https://www.unige.ch/sciences/terre/research/Groups/mineral_resources/archive/pub_archive/sga2002/sga2002.html

Bendezú, R., Fontboté, L., & Cosca, M. (2003). Relative age of Cordilleran base metal lode and replacement deposits, and high sulfidation Au–(Ag) epithermal
mineralization in the Colquijirca mining district, central Peru. Mineralium Deposita, 683-694.

Bendezú, R., Page, L., Spikings, R., Pecskay, Z., & Fonboté, L. (2008). New 40Ar/39Ar alunite ages from the Colquijirca district, Peru: evidence of a long period of
magmatic SO2 degassing during formation of epithermal Au–Ag and Cordilleran polymetallic ores. Miner Deposita (2008), 777–789.

Buenaventura. (2021). Buenaventura. Obtenido de https://www.buenaventura.com/

Buenaventura. (2021). Reporte de Estimación de Recursos.

Buenaventura. (2021). Reporte de Estimación de Recursos.

El Brocal. (2019). Obtenido de https://www.elbrocal.pe/operaciones.html

El Brocal. (2020). Reporte de Sostenibilidad. Sociedad Minera el Brocal S.A.A.

El Brocal. (2021). Geología del Distrito Minero: Colquijirca. Sociedad Minera El Brocal S.A.A.

Ellis Geophysical Consulting Inc. (2003). Acquisition Review and Interpretation of 2003 Gravity Survey - Cerro Marcapunta Project, Pasco, Perú. Ellis Geophysical
Consulting Inc.

INGEMMET. (2011). Geología del Cuadrángulo de Cerro de Pasco, Hoja 22-k, Boletín N° 144 Serie A, Carta Geológica Nacional, Escala 1:50,000. Lima.

INGEMMET. (2021). Plataforma digital única del Estado Peruano. Obtenido de Concesiones Mineras: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/ingemmet/colecciones/1880-
concesiones-mineras

SRK. (2021). Reporte de Estimación de Recursos .

Territorio y Medio Ambiente S.A.C. (2019). Quinto Informe Técnico Sustentatorio de la Unidad Minera Colquijirca. Territorio y Medio Ambiente S.A.C.

Ventura, M. (2020). Memorandum - Revisión Geológica del Tajo Colquijirca y Sondajes. Buenaventura.

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 306

25 Reliance on Information Provided by the Registrant

25.1 Introduction
The QPs fully relied on the registrant for the guidance in the areas noted in the following sub-sections.  Buenaventura has active mining operations in Peru and
has considerable experience in developing mining operations in the jurisdiction.
The QPs undertook checks that the information provided by the registrant was suitable to be used in the Report.

25.2 Macroeconomic Trends

Information relating to inflation, interest rates, discount rates, foreign exchange rates and taxes.  
This information is used in the economic analysis in Chapter 19.  It supports the Mineral Resources estimate in Chapter 11, and the mineral reserve estimate in
Chapter 12.  

25.3 Markets
Information relating to market studies/markets for product, market entry strategies, marketing and sales contracts, product valuation, product specifications,
refining and treatment charges, transportation costs, agency relationships, material contracts (e.g., mining, concentrating, smelting, refining, transportation,
handling, hedging arrangements, and forward sales contracts), and contract status (in place, renewals).  
This information is used when discussing the market, commodity price and contract information in Chapter 16, and in the economic analysis in Chapter 19.  It
supports the Mineral Resources estimate in Chapter 11, and the mineral reserve estimate in Chapter 12.

25.4 Legal Matters

Information relating to the corporate ownership interest, the mineral tenure (concessions, payments to retain, obligation to meet expenditure/reporting of work
conducted), surface rights, water rights (water take allowances), royalties, encumbrances, easements and rights-of-way, violations, and fines, permitting
requirements, ability to maintain and renew permits
This information is used in support of the property ownership information in Chapter 3, the permitting and closure discussions in Chapter 17, and the economic
analysis in Chapter 19.  It supports the Mineral Resources estimate in Chapter 11, and the mineral reserve estimate in Chapter 12.

25.5 Environmental Matters

Information relating to baseline and supporting studies for environmental permitting, environmental permitting and monitoring requirements, ability to maintain
and renew permits, emissions controls, closure planning, closure and reclamation bonding and bonding requirements, sustainability accommodations, and
monitoring for and compliance with requirements relating to protected areas and protected species.
This information is used when discussing property ownership information in Chapter 3, the permitting and closure discussions in Chapter 17, and the economic
analysis in Chapter 19.  It

April, 2022
SRK Consulting Peru SA
SEC Technical Report Summary – El Brocal Page 307

supports the Mineral Resources estimate in Chapter 11, and the mineral reserve estimate in Chapter 12.

25.6 Stakeholder Accommodations

Information relating to social and stakeholder baseline and supporting studies, hiring and training policies for workforce from local communities, partnerships
with stakeholders (including national, regional, and state mining associations; trade organizations; fishing organizations; state and local chambers of
commerce; economic development organizations; non-government organizations; and regional and national governments), and the community relations plan.
This information is used in the social and community discussions in Chapter 17, and the economic analysis in Chapter 19.  It supports the Mineral Resources
estimate in Chapter 11, and the mineral reserve estimate in Chapter 12.

25.7 Governmental Factors

Information relating to taxation and royalty considerations at the Project level, monitoring requirements and monitoring frequency, bonding requirements.
This information is used in the economic analysis in Chapter 19.  It supports the Mineral Resources estimate in Chapter 11, and the mineral reserve estimate in
Chapter 12.  

April, 2022