0% found this document useful (0 votes)
82 views4 pages

Steel 2D Analysis & Design (EN1993)

This document summarizes the analysis and design of a steel beam according to Eurocode standards. The beam is 6 meters long with a UB 457x191x82 cross section and is subjected to a uniform distributed load of 10 kN/m. The analysis determined the bending moment is 72.4 kNm and shear is 48.3 kN at various points along the beam. The design checks the beam's shear and bending resistance according to Eurocode requirements and confirms the design resistance exceeds the effects, indicating the beam is adequate for the given loading.

Uploaded by

Truong Phuoc Tri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
82 views4 pages

Steel 2D Analysis & Design (EN1993)

This document summarizes the analysis and design of a steel beam according to Eurocode standards. The beam is 6 meters long with a UB 457x191x82 cross section and is subjected to a uniform distributed load of 10 kN/m. The analysis determined the bending moment is 72.4 kNm and shear is 48.3 kN at various points along the beam. The design checks the beam's shear and bending resistance according to Eurocode requirements and confirms the design resistance exceeds the effects, indicating the beam is adequate for the given loading.

Uploaded by

Truong Phuoc Tri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Project Job Ref.

HTL Section Sheet no./rev.


1
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
A 8/28/2022

STEEL MEMBER ANALYSIS & DESIGN (EN1993-1-1:2005)


In accordance with EN1993-1-1:2005 incorporating Corrigenda February 2006 and April 2009 and the UK national
annex
Tedds calculation version 4.4.08

ANALYSIS
Tedds calculation version 1.0.37

Geometry
Geometry (m) - Steel (EC3) - UB 457x191x82
Z
1 6 2
X
1

Span Length (m) Section Start Support End Support


1 6 UB 457x191x82 Pinned Pinned
UB 457x191x82: Area 104 cm2, Inertia Major 37051 cm4, Inertia Minor 1871 cm4, Shear area parallel to
Minor 46 cm2, Shear area parallel to Major = 55 cm2
Steel (EC3): Density 7850 kg/m3, Youngs 210 kN/mm2, Shear 80.8 kN/mm2, Thermal 0.000012 C-1
Loading
Self weight included

Imposed - Loading (kN/m)


10

10
X

Load combination factors


Self Weight

Permanent

Imposed

Load combination

1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.5RQ (Strength) 1.35 1.35 1.50


1.0G + 1.0Q + 1.0RQ (Service) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Member Loads
Member Load case Load Type Orientation Description
Beam Imposed UDL GlobalZ 10 kN/m
Project Job Ref.

HTL Section Sheet no./rev.


2
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
A 8/28/2022

Results
Forces
Strength combinations - Moment envelope (kNm)

72.4

Strength combinations - Shear envelope (kN)


48.3

-48.3

Service combinations - Deflection envelope (mm)

2.5

Partial factors - Section 6.1


Resistance of cross-sections; M0 = 1
Resistance of members to instability; M1 = 1
Resistance of tensile members to fracture; M2 = 1.1

Beam design
Section details
Section type; UB 457x191x82 (BS4-1)
Steel grade - EN 10025-2:2004; S355
Nominal thickness of element; tnom = max(tf, tw) = 16 mm
Nominal yield strength; fy = 355 N/mm2
Nominal ultimate tensile strength; fu = 470 N/mm2
Modulus of elasticity; E = 210000 N/mm2
Project Job Ref.

HTL Section Sheet no./rev.


3
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
A 8/28/2022

16
UB 457x191x82 (BS4-1)
Section depth, h, 460 mm
Section breadth, b, 191.3 mm
Mass of section, Mass, 82 kg/m
Flange thickness, tf, 16 mm
Web thickness, tw, 9.9 mm
Root radius, r, 10.2 mm
Area of section, A, 10448 mm 2
Radius of gyration about y-axis, i y, 188.314 mm
Radius of gyration about z-axis, i z, 42.315 mm
460

Elastic section modulus about y-axis, Wel.y, 1610928 mm 3


Elastic section modulus about z-axis, Wel.z, 195591 mm 3
Plastic section modulus about y-axis, Wpl.y, 1831284 mm 3
9.9 Plastic section modulus about z-axis, Wpl.z, 303898 mm 3
Second moment of area about y-axis, I y, 370513482 mm 4
Second moment of area about z-axis, I z, 18708282 mm 4
16

191.3

Lateral restraint
Both flanges have lateral restraint at supports only

Consider Combination 1 - 1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.5RQ (Strength)


Classification of cross sections - Section 5.5
 = [235 N/mm2 / fy] = 0.81

Internal compression parts subject to bending - Table 5.2 (sheet 1 of 3)


Width of section; c = d = 407.6 mm
c / tw = 41.2 = 50.6   <= 72  ; Class 1

Outstand flanges - Table 5.2 (sheet 2 of 3)


Width of section; c = (b - tw - 2  r) / 2 = 80.5 mm
c / tf = 5 = 6.2   <= 9  ; Class 1
Section is class 1

Check design at start of span


Check shear - Section 6.2.6
Height of web; hw = h - 2  tf = 428 mm;  = 1.000
hw / tw = 43.2 = 53.1   /  < 72   / 
Shear buckling resistance can be ignored
Design shear force; Vy,Ed = 48.3 kN
Shear area - cl 6.2.6(3); Av = max(A - 2  b  tf + (tw + 2  r)  tf,   hw  tw) = 4811 mm2
Design shear resistance - cl 6.2.6(2); Vc,y,Rd = Vpl,y,Rd = Av  (fy / (3)) / M0 = 986.1 kN
Vy,Ed / Vc,y,Rd = 0.049
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force

Check design 3000 mm along span


Check bending moment - Section 6.2.5
Design bending moment; My,Ed = 72.4 kNm
Design bending resistance moment - eq 6.13; Mc,y,Rd = Mpl,y,Rd = W pl.y  fy / M0 = 650.1 kNm
My,Ed / Mc,y,Rd = 0.111
Project Job Ref.

HTL Section Sheet no./rev.


4
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
A 8/28/2022

PASS - Design bending resistance moment exceeds design bending moment


Slenderness ratio for lateral torsional buckling
Correction factor - Table 6.6; kc = 0.94
C1 = 1 / kc2 = 1.132
Poissons ratio;  = 0.3
Shear modulus; G = E / [2  (1 + )] = 80769 N/mm2
Unrestrained effective length; L = 1.0  Lm1_s1_seg1_T = 6000 mm
Elastic critical buckling moment; Mcr = C1  2  E  Iz / L2  (Iw / Iz + L2  G  It / (2  E  Iz)) = 387.8 kNm
Slenderness ratio for lateral torsional buckling; LT = (W pl.y  fy / Mcr) = 1.295
Limiting slenderness ratio; LT,0 = 0.4
LT >LT,0 - Lateral torsional buckling cannot be ignored
Check buckling resistance - Section 6.3.2.1
Buckling curve - Table 6.5; c
Imperfection factor - Table 6.3; LT = 0.49
Correction factor for rolled sections;  = 0.75
LTB reduction determination factor; LT = 0.5  [1 + LT  (LT -LT,0) +  LT2] = 1.348
LTB reduction factor - eq 6.57; LT = min(1 / [LT + (LT2 -  LT2)], 1, 1 /LT2) = 0.477
Modification factor; f = min(1 - 0.5  (1 - kc)  [1 - 2  (LT - 0.8)2], 1) = 0.985
Modified LTB reduction factor - eq 6.58; LT,mod = min(LT / f, 1, 1 / LT2) = 0.485
Design buckling resistance moment - eq 6.55; Mb,y,Rd = LT,mod  W pl.y  fy / M1 = 315 kNm
My,Ed / Mb,y,Rd = 0.23
PASS - Design buckling resistance moment exceeds design bending moment

Consider Combination 2 - 1.0G + 1.0Q + 1.0RQ (Service)

Check design 3000 mm along span


Check y-y axis deflection - Section 7.2.1
Maximum deflection; y = 2.5 mm
Allowable deflection; y,Allowable = Lm1_s1 / 360 = 16.7 mm
y / y,Allowable = 0.149
PASS - Allowable deflection exceeds design deflection

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy