Three ColorCamera TheThreeColorProcess
Three ColorCamera TheThreeColorProcess
TECHNICAL
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT
the earliest days of the Technicolor development, we recognized
I
N
that the ultimate goal of workers in the field of color cinema·
tography must be a process which would add a full scale of color
reproduction to the existing black-and-white product without sub-
tracting from any of its desirable qualities, without imposing any
complications on theatre projection conditions, and with a minimum
of added burden in the cost of photography and in the cost of prints.
These considerations seemed to clearly indicate a three-color sub-
tractive printing process capable of ultimate low cost of manufacture.
In those days, most other efforts to develop a subtractive printing
process made use of double-coated positive stock, invented about 1912
by Hernandez-Mejia. We found a number of objections to the use
of this stock; particularly, to the spatial separation of the two compo-
nents, to the susceptibility to scratching during processing and projec-
tion, but most of all, to the impediment imposed upon an ultimate
three-color result.
Surveying the field, we chose to work on the multi-layer, or mono·
pack process, and the imbibition process. In a monopack process the
several components are in successive layers all coated on the same side
of the film strip. In the imbibition process, the several components
consist of images formed in water soluble dyes printed onto, or rather
into, a gelatine coated film strip much as colored ink images are
printed onto paper in the process of photo-lithography. A multi-
layer, or monopack, process can theoretically be used as a taking
process and as a printing process; whereas imbibition, being a photo·
mechanical process, is limited to use as a printing process and requires
to be supplemented by a taking method, preferably one providing
distinct separation negatives. As printing processes, both monopack
and imbibition yield a final product containing all components on
one side of the film strip and with no limitation as to their number.
Some fundamental and far-reaching work on the monopack process
by the late Dr. Troland, who at the time of his death was Research
Director of Technicolor, resulted in the issuance in 1932 of Reissue
Patent No. 18,680, containing two hundred and thirty-nine claims,
broadly covering this field both for taking and printing. The imbibi-
tion process seemed to present a less formidable array of processing
problems than did the monopack process, so we pushed its develop·
ment with even greater effort.
*Vice-Pres id~nt and Technical Director, Technicolor Motion Picture Corporation.
2 THE THREE COLOR PROCESS
FIGURE 1
Fig. 1 shows schematically the arrangement of optical parts and
films in this camera. In making use of a bipack at one aperture, we
4 THE THREE COLOR PROCESS
magenta), and minus blue (or yellow) . The relation of the taking
colors to the printing colors is made clear in the accompanying dia-
gram (Fig. 2) .
MINUS BLU E
• RED lit GREeN
Q - -
=YELLOW
RED BLUE
\ I
\
MINUS GREEN
=RED 8! BLUE
=MA GENTA
uK Note: Solid lines join the fhmllry
Colors. ~ Dotted lines join the
Complementary 5ubtrBctive Colon;.
FIGURE 2
To show the manner in which the final print is built up, we have
prepared a short demonstration reel of a single scene. First you will
see the sound track and the yellow dye component, next the cyan
component, finally the magenta component and then the complete
image.
PHOTOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLES
The process just described is designed to reproduce whatever was
placed in front of the camera, not only as to color but also as to light
and shade. But even the best of reproduction procedures, even that
of oil painting on canvas, is rather severely limited when it comes to
reproducing light and shade. The contrast from whitest white to
blackest bl ack in a painting is perhaps l to 32. Upon projection
from transparencies, as in motion picture work, the range may be
slightly greater, about l to 64, but in no case is the great range of
sensitivity of the eye adequately reproduced. The art of painting and
the art of photography then, have this in common: that they seek to
suggest a great range of visual contrasts by a skillful use of the more
limited contrasts available in the method of reproduction.
In color photography, all very full exposures tend to bleach out
to white and all low exposures tend to drop into black. A high-light
on a face in black-and-white photography can, in the final print,
be merely the bare celluloid and the result will be still entirely
satisfactory; but if, in a color print, such a condition exists, the
delicate flesh tint will, in that area, be bleached out to white and the
face will look blotchy. All areas of the face should, therefore, be
reproduced in such a manner as to yield a good flesh tint. Very light
makeups, and oily makeups having considerable shine are apt to be
troublesome. In any case, it is necessary to control the light and
lighting contrasts accurately and to avoid "hot spots."
6 THE THREE COLOR PROCESS
a light source of greater power than any now available. Pending its
development, the well-known California sun promises to return to
its former importance. In other words, sizeable sunlit exteriors to he
photographed in color had best he real. The difficulties of imitating
grass, shrubs, etc., also argue in the same direction.
In the case of night exteriors (class D) , color has one great
advantage over black-and-white in that it is possible to contrast
moonlight and lamplight for example by the use of blue and
amber filters.
CONCLUSION
There is a general appreciation of the fact that "color is coming."
When sound swept the industry several years ago, it meant the intro-
duction . of a new and different technique, and of men of new and
different training. The sound engineer was the "big shot." The
cameraman was locked in a padded cell with his camera, and the art
director was told how he could and could not construct his sets to
meet the new acoustic considerations. Conditions will he much more
enjoyable for everyone concerned when color sweeps the industry.
The sound men will not he affected in any way at all hut the camera·
man and the art director will he given new tools to work with
whereby the value and importance of what they can contribute to a
picture will he greatly increased. For these reasons it is to he
expected that the technicians generally will he enthusiastic and
cooperative with the rising tide of color.
10 THE THREE COLOR PROCESS
MR. MACGOWAN:
Another paper which was prepared for tonight is "Color Consciousness," by
Natalie M. Kalmus, Color Director of Technicolor. I must read this in her absence.
Mrs. Kalmus has a kind of double job at Technicolor. In the case of certain
color pictures, Mrs. Kalmus has supplied the art direction and supervised the
actual use of color in costumes and settings. In the case of "Becky Sharp,"
Robert Edmond ]ones, the scene designer, did this work, but Mrs. Kalmus was
responsible for the study of what colors and what shades of colors are modified
in reproduction through the color camera, and for the solution of the many
technical problems involved in getting on the screen what we want you to see.
18 THE THREE COLOR PROCESS
I do not mean to say that necessarily all the films will have to he
in color, hut certainly the great majority of them will he. As in the
art of painting, while we admire and love black and white drawings
and etchings, could we ever do without paintings? So far the screen
has been using a pencil; now it is given a palette with paints.
I don't want to be misunderstood. I don't want to imply that the
black and white film is not beautiful nor that the color film com·
pletely displaces the black and white. As a matter of fact, the black
and white has a beauty of its own that could never fade away. The
very unreality of those pale shadows moving on the screen and that
remote quality of a dream, constitute the attraction and the spell of
the black and white film that could not be destroyed. There will
always be room for certain subjects to be treated in terms of these
fascinating grey shadows. But color comes to the screen now as a
new Spring to the earth. It comes as an inspiring and exciting gift,
which opens new horizons of creation for the artist and enjoyment
for the onlooker.
I am stating this now not merely as a theoretical point, hut as a
result of an actual experience I went through recently. This experi·
ence was directing "Becky Sharp," the first full-length feature in
color. That was a new and wondrous adventure. It had all the thrill
and excitement of pioneering in a new field and discovering a
theretofore unexplored fairyland.
At that time he was the head of the studio and I was lucky enough
to be assigned the first picture in color. Then Mr. Cooper was taken
ill. While he was away we determined not to make a long picture
but a short. That was "La Cucaracha." This fall when Mr. Cooper
recovered and was ready to go to work again, he had to make two
pictures in black and white, and again I had the good luck to be on
the job and to do "Becky Sharp." I'm boring you with this history
only to give a bow to Merian Cooper as the father of three color
production on the screen.
Another thing I want to say about technicians is that it seems to
me they are wonderful people to deal with. I've found that true in
the studio and particularly true at Technicolor. As soon as I went
to work on "La Cucaracha" and "Becky Sharp" I came more and
more into contact with these people and I found them quite as
intelligent, quite as farseeing as I had found them twenty years ago
in Philadelphia when, as a motion picture editor, I first came in
contact with Dr. Kalmus and his co-workers. I could name half a
dozen men at Technicolor who have done wonderful work, not only
in devising this new process but in cooperating with and understand-
ing the rather screwy people connected with production.
Before you see the reels of film which we have here to show you,
I would like to point out one thing which seems quite significant
to me. There is some resistance to color due to the fact that we
discovered black-and-white photography first.
Suppose there had never been black-and-white photography or
black-and-white half-tone reproduction. Suppose we had been used
to color photographs and colored pictures for the past fifty or seventy-
five years. Then if someone invented the black-and-white photography
and black-and-white half-tones the result would, I am sure, be fright-
fully disappointing and definitely puzzling. We would have to trans-
late all the tones almost as we translate a foreign language mentally
when we hear someone speaking it. We would have to figure out
mentally what actual color was represented by the grey of a face, the
hlack of a tree, etc. I found somewhat the same effect after I saw a
two-color picture, "The Wax Museum." When a normal black-and-
white picture came on the screen it gave me a curious psychological
shock and the thought, "What is this-a painting in mud?" Experi-
ences like this are going to beat down our instinctive resistance
to color.
One thing that is going to push color very far ahead is television.
I was in the theatre a good many years as a producer, and I saw the
road destroyed by the movies. The silent screen was destroyed by the
talking picture. Then the talking picture had to meet the competition
of the radio. Now they tell us television is coming, and motion picture
producers are beginning to worry about it. People can turn a little
button and sit at home and be entertained, but they are going to get
that entertainment in black-and-white for a good many years. Color
television will come undoubtedly, but it will come late, and in the
meantime the screen will be able. to use color against the competition
of television. There will he an added sense of vividness in the theatre
that will not be apparent on the home screen.