0% found this document useful (0 votes)
164 views5 pages

10 Assignment (PQT)

1. This document discusses reliability and mean time between failures (MTBF) calculations for components in series and parallel. It also discusses reliability calculations for redundant parallel systems. 2. Maintenance data from Orlando Utilities over 20 years is analyzed to find the expected number of yearly breakdowns is 2.7. 3. Preventive maintenance costs for a manufacturer's 18 year service contract are analyzed and found to be $7,000 per year, more expensive than the current maintenance policy's expected failure cost of $4,300 per year. Therefore, the current policy should be kept.

Uploaded by

jayann carranza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
164 views5 pages

10 Assignment (PQT)

1. This document discusses reliability and mean time between failures (MTBF) calculations for components in series and parallel. It also discusses reliability calculations for redundant parallel systems. 2. Maintenance data from Orlando Utilities over 20 years is analyzed to find the expected number of yearly breakdowns is 2.7. 3. Preventive maintenance costs for a manufacturer's 18 year service contract are analyzed and found to be $7,000 per year, more expensive than the current maintenance policy's expected failure cost of $4,300 per year. Therefore, the current policy should be kept.

Uploaded by

jayann carranza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

1.

Reliability in Series

R1 R2 R3

.99 .98 .90 Rs

Rs= R1 × R2 × R3 … × Rn

Rs= 0.99 × 0.98 × 0.90 = 0.873 or 87.3%

2. Determining Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF)

Operating Time= 60,000 hours Non-Operating Time= 80,000 hours


Number of Failures= 4 Failures Number of Units= 10 units

A. Percent of failure

4 failures
FR%= 10units ×100%

=0.4 × 100%

= 40%

Total time= 60,000 hours × 10 unit

=600,000 hours-unit

Non-Op time= 50,000hrs (1) +35,000hrs (2) +15,000hrs (2)

=80,000 hours-unit

B. Number of failures per unit


number of failures
FR (N) =
number of unit−hrs of Optime

4 failures
FR (N) = = 0.000008 failures
600,000−100,000 hours

600,000 hours
MBTF = = 75,000 hrs.
0.000008 failures

3. Reliability in Parallel

Product A
R1 R2 R3 R4
0.99 0.95 0.998 0.995

RS = 0.99 × 0.95 × 0.998 × 0.995


= 0.934
Product B
R1 R2 R3 R4
0.99 0.95 0.985 0.99

0.95 0.99

= 0.99 × 0.95 × [0.985 + (1-0.985)0.95] × [0.99+0.99(1-0.99)]


= 0.99 × 0.95 × [0.985 + (0.015×0.95)] × [0.99+(0.99×0.01)]
= 0.99 × 0.95 × (0.985 + 0.014) × (0.99+0.009)
= 0.99 × 0.95 × 0.999 ×0.999
=0.939

Note: The product design A has a reliability of 0.934 and the product design B has a reliability
of 0.939.

4. Reliability with Parallel Redundancy


R1
0.95
R2 R3 R5
0.95 0.95 0.95
R4
0.95

* Reliability for Middle path (RM)

RM = R 2 × R 3 × R 5

RM = 0.95 × 0.95 × 0.95

= 0.857

* Probability of all three failure (RF)

RF = (1-0.95) × (1-0.857) × (1-0.95)

= 0.05 × 0.143 × 0.05

= 0.00036

*Reliability of new design is 1 minus the probability of failures (R S)

Rs = 1 - 0.00036

= 0.99964

Note: The parallel design increase in 0.999

5. Maintenance
Case: Orlando Utilities exhibited data over the past 20 years.
Number of breakdowns Number of years in which

breakdown occurred
0 2
= 0.1
20
1 2
= 0.1
20
2 5
= 0.25
20
3 4
= 0.2
20
4 5
= 0.25
20
5 2
= 0.1
20
6 0
= 0
20

*Expected number of yearly breakdowns


= [(0 × 0.1) +(1 × 0.1) +(2 × 0.25) +(3 ×
0.2) +(4×0.25) +(5×0.1) +(6×0)]
=0 + 0.1 + 0.5 + 0.6 + 1 + 0.5 + 0
= 2.7 breakdowns/year

6. Preventive Maintenance

Case: The manufacturer will guarantee repairs o all failures as part of service contract over 18 years.
Number of Failures Number of years in which

breakdown occurred
0 4
= 0.22
18
1 3
= 0.16
18
2 1
= 0.05
18
3 5
= 0.27
18
4 5
= 0.27
18
5 0
= 0
18

- Compute for the expected number of failures.


= [(0 × 0.22) + (1 × 0.16) + (2 × 0.05) + (3 × 0.27) + (4 × 0.27) + (5×0)]

= 0 + 0.16 + 0.1 + 0.8 + 1.08 + 0

= 2.15 failures/year

- Compute the expected failure cost per year with preventive maintenance contract.
Expected failure cost =(expected number of failure)×(cost per failure)
= 2.15 × $2,000

= $4,300/year

- Compute the preventive maintenance

Preventive maintenance cost

= (cost of each failure) + (cost of service per year)

= $ 2,000 + $5,000

= $ 7,000/year

- Compare the two options and select the one that will cost less Because it is less expensive to
have the current maintenance service ($4300) than to guarantee a service repair for all failures
($7,000),The fire department should choose the current maintenance policy.

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy