Tropicana
Tropicana
Tropicana is a very famous brand that sells fruit juice worldwide. On January 9th 2009, the
PepsiCo-owned brand decided to replace the existing packaging design for its best-selling orange
juice with new packaging for the North American market.
However, this new packaging design was rejected and criticized by the majority of Tropicana’s
consumers. The launch of the new packaging was indeed such a failure that Tropicana had to
drop it to come back to the original version of the packaging.
First of all let’s summarize the facts to better understand the reasons for this packaging failure.
1. Tropicana invested 35 million dollars in an advertising campaign that promoted the new
packaging for the fruit juice brand. Both the packaging design and the advertising
campaign were created by the same agency; Arnell.
2. On January 8th 2009, Tropicana launched the new packaging for its best-selling product
in North America – Tropicana Pure Premium, with sales revenues reaching more than
700 million dollars per year. A few days later, consumers started criticizing the new
design, especially on social networks. Two months later, sales dropped by 20%, and this
spectacular decrease in sales represented a lost of 30 million dollars for Tropicana.
3. Meanwhile, Tropicana’s competitors took advantage of the “Tropicana crisis” and gained
the sales lost by the fruit juice brands.
4. On February 23rd 2009, Tropicana announced that it would return to its original
packaging design, and within a few months, the old packaging was back for good on all
supermarket shelves
5. In total, this initiative cost Tropicana more than 50 million dollars.
To understand this strategy failure, it is important to analyze what did Tropicana change in its
packaging design.
“We thought it would be important to take this brand and bring it or evolve it into a more current
or modern state.” stated Peter Arnell, director of the creative agency Arnell in his speech
explaining the strategy chosen for the Tropicana product.
The images:
Perhaps one of the most important changes is the fact that a big transparent glass full of orange
juice replaced the orange and its straw.
“Historically, we always show the outside of the orange. What was fascinating was that we had
never shown the product called the juice.”
The lid:
The agency decided then to take the orange and move it to the lid of the bottle. The idea is
creative and interesting, as we can see that the cap really has the shape and texture of half an
orange that you can squeeze to obtain a fresh orange juice. This message goes along with the
new advertising campaign launched by the same time, and both the packaging and the ad include
the statement “Squeeze, it’s a natural”.
“We wanted to take the orange and put it somewhere. We engineered this interesting little
squeeze cap here … so that the notion of squeezing the orange was implied ergonomically.”
The logo:
Another important difference between the two packs is the new logo design.
The original one was horizontal followed by the product name “Pure Premium”, while the new
logo is vertical with a simpler and more modern font. The logo size was also reduced to highlight
the message: “100% Orange Pure and Natural”
4) The advertising campaign that was released with the new packaging design
Tropicana released a new advertising campaign along with its packaging strategy. The main
message communicated in this campaign was “Squeeze, it’s a natural”.
“The whole idea of ‘squeeze,’ ” Mr. Campbell said, is to play up “the functional benefit” of
orange juice in providing fruit for people’s daily diets “and the emotional connection people
have with Tropicana.”
“We underestimated the deep emotional bond they had with the original packaging” […]“What
we didn’t get was the passion this very loyal small group of consumers have. That wasn’t
something that came out in the research. […] Those consumers are very important to us, so we
responded.” explained Mr. Campbell, president at Tropicana North America in Chicago.
Perhaps the problem goes beyond this emotional bond consumers had with the old packaging.
It is very important to consider the role of packaging design in branding, and its link with
merchandising. Young and Ciummo stated in their article that packaging redesigns often come
with a small decrease in sales, but this tends to be temporary and has never been as severe as the
20% decrease experienced by Tropicana.
In this case, many consumers didn’t recognize the product on supermarket shelves. Some loyal
consumers saw the “100% Orange Juice” and asked themselves if the product was still the same
as the Tropical Pure Premium they always trusted. Then appeared a series of confusions in
consumers’ minds who lost their main reference elements to recognize the product. These
include:
To finish, and because the packaging had a more simple design than the original one, most
consumers described it as “ugly”, and explained it seemed to be from a low-range supermarket
brand. Consumers were confused by this new look that made the brand seem to be cheap, as
Tropicana had always been perceived as a premium brand.
Branding is a complex subject and it is often difficult to predict the market’s reaction to a
strategy change.
However, I believe that, both from an individual and company-standpoint, we can learn several
lessons from Tropicana’s strategic mistake:
1. Consumers feel an emotional bond with the appearance of the product and brand
they love.
Consumers have an emotional connection with brands they purchase and can feel betrayed and
disappointed if they suddenly can no longer identify with new brand elements of the packaging
design. It is important to always consider this before making changes to packaging designs.
If you want to redesign your product’s packaging, make sure you do not change everything at
once. The changes need to be done progressively to ensure the consumer will still recognize the
brand.
Of course, this only applies for successful brands such as Tropicana. If your brand and product
are not doing well, a total rebrand can be a good solution to save the product on the market. In
fact, we’ve seen many cases (Herbal Essences comes to mind) in which significant packaging
changes have driven sales.
Packaging is the last communication element brands have with consumers on the purchasing
decision process. Its design and content are essential to the brand because it will influence the
consumer’s decision at the last minute. Tropicana’s consumers didn’t recognize or like the new
product design, and therefore decided not to purchase it.
Through advertising, companies have more time and support to communicate emotions
and new values. The mission of advertising is to inform and communicate sensations that
will last in the long-term. It is a more flexible communication support over time.
Through packaging design, companies need to communicate in a more direct, clear and
identifiable manner, as the consumer is about to make its final purchase decision.
Of course, packaging and advertising strategies should always be in line, as with any marketing
activity in general. However, there are some communication codes to each domain that need to
be respected. In the case of Tropicana, the packaging codes weren’t, and this caused the failure
of the new design.
7) Conclusion:
The Tropicana redesign illustrated the considerable power of packaging. While this was a
distinctively negative example, it’s important to keep in mind that this same power does often
work in a positive direction.
The takeaway for marketers and brand strategists should be an even greater respect for packaging
and a deeper commitment to leveraging this brand asset with a methodical procedure. This will
ensure consumers accept the change in a positive manner!