O P Y

C
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 2 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

CONTENTS

PAGE

1. CUSTOMER INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 3

2. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST(E.U.T.) ................................................................................................... 3

3. TEST SPECIFICATION, METHODS & PROCEDURES ..................................................................... 5

4. OPERATION OF E.U.T. DURING TESTING ...................................................................................... 9

5. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ........................................................................................................ 14

6. CONDUCTED EMISSION .................................................................................................................. 17

7. RADIATED EMISSION ...................................................................................................................... 20

P Y
8. ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE ....................................................................................................... 24

O
9. RADIO-FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD ...................................................................... 27

C
10. ELECTRICAL FAST TRANSIENT/BURST........................................................................................ 31

11. SURGE ................................................................................................................................................ 34

12. RADIO-FREQUENCY CONDUCTED DISTURBANCES .................................................................. 37

13. POWER FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD ...................................................................................... 41

14. VOLTAGE DIPS AND SHORT INTERRUPTIONS............................................................................ 44

APPENDIX1: TEST CONFIGURATION PHOTOGRAPHS ......................................................................... 48

APPENDIX2: DATA OF TEST ...................................................................................................................... 58

APPENDIX3: ANTENNA BEAMWIDTH SPECIFICATIONS ..................................................................... 74

APPENDIX4: ELECTRIC FIELD STRENGTH CORRECTION .................................................................. 75

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 3 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

1. CUSTOMER INFORMATION

Company Name : Oki Data Corporation

Address : 3-1, Futaba-cho, Takasaki-shi, Gunma 370-8585, Japan

Telephone Number : ＋81- 27-328-6399

Facsimile Number : ＋81- 27-328-6396

2. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST(E.U.T.)

Y
2.1. Identification of E.U.T.

O P
Brand Name or Manufacturer : Oki Data Corporation

C
Product Name : Label Printer

Model Number : N36201B

Serial Number : N/A

Maximum Operating Frequency : 1200 MHz

Rating : 220V-240V AC, 50Hz/60Hz

Input power condition during the test : AC230V 50Hz

Condition of EUT : Production prototype

Connected cable : See page 10 to 13

Country of Manufacturer : Japan

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 4 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

2.2. Product Description

Label Printer.

・Variation / family model

・Variation / family model list

N36200B(4 colors)
N36201B(5 colors) ※ Measuring model

・Variation / family model Reason for selection

Y
The reason for selecting the variation/family model.

P
The model "N36201B" was selected because it has the most features among the models.

C O

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 5 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

3. TEST SPECIFICATION, METHODS & PROCEDURES

3.1. Test Specification

EMI : EN55032:2015
Title : Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment
-Emission requirements

EMS : EN 61000-6-1:2007
Title : Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). Generic standards. Immunity for
residential, commercial and light-industrial environments

Purpose of test : Standard of EU EMC directive compliance.

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 6 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

3.2. Methods & Procedures

EMI
No. Item Test Procedure Limits Remarks
Conducted emission at
1 mains terminals and EN55032:2015 Class A AMN
telecommunication ports
10m
2 Radiated emission EN55032:2015 Class A
3m

EMS
No. Item Test Procedure Specification Criterion
Electrostatic
IEC61000-4-2:2008 ±4kV contact discharge
1 discharge B
EN 61000-4-2:2009 ±8kV air discharge
requirements

Y
80MHz-1GHz

P
3V/m(unmodulated)
IEC61000-4-3:2006
Radiated RF 1.4GHz-2.0GHz

O
+A1:2007+A2:2010
2 electromagnetic 3V/m(unmodulated) A

C
EN 61000-4-3:2006
field requirements 2.0GHz-2.7GHz
+A1:2008+A2:2010
1V/m(unmodulated)
AM, 1kHz, 80%
Electrical fast ±1.0kV(input AC power port)
IEC61000-4-4:2012
3 transient burst ±0.5kV(signal port) B
EN 61000-4-4:2012
requirements 5/50ns, 5kHz
±2.0kV(Line to earth : input AC
IEC61000-4-5:2014
power port)
Surge immunity +A1:2017
4 ±1.0kV(Line to line : input AC B
requirements EN 61000-4-5:2014
power port)
+A1:2017
1.2/50μs
0.15-80MHz
Conducted RF 3V(unmodulated)
IEC61000-4-6:2013
5 common mode AM, 1kHz, 80% A
EN 61000-4-6:2014
requirements (input AC power port, signal &
telecommunication port)
Power-frequency
IEC61000-4-8:2009
6 magnetic field 50/60Hz, 3A/m A
EN 61000-4-8:2010
requirements
0%UT/250/300 cycle C
IEC61000-4-11:2004 (short interruptions)
Voltage dips and
+A1:2017 70%UT/25/30 cycle (dips) C
7 short interruptions
EN 61000-4-11:2004 0%UT/1cycle (dips) B
test requirements
+A1:2017 0%UT/0.5cycle (dips) B
UT is the rated voltage of the EUT.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 7 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

3.3. Deviation from standard

There was no deviation.

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 8 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

3.4. Performance Criterion

For the EUT, the client has decided that the performance criteria defined in EN61000-6-1:2007 should
be applied as follows:

The variety and diversity of the apparatus within the scope of this standard makes it difficult to define
precise criteria for the evaluation of the immunity test results.

If, as a result of the application of the tests defined in this standard, the apparatus becomes dangerous
or unsafe, the apparatus shall be deemed to have failed the test.

A functional description and a definition of performance criteria, during or as a consequence of the

EMC testing, shall be provided by the manufacturer and noted in the test report, based on one of the
following criteria for each test as specified in Tables 1 to 4.

a) Performance criterion A: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended during and after the
test. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified
by the manufacturer, when the apparatus is used as intended. The performance level may be replaced

Y
by a permissible loss of performance. If the minimum performance level or the permissible

P
performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, either of these may be derived from the product
description and documentation and what the user may reasonably expect from the apparatus if used

O
as intended.

C
b) Performance criterion B: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended after the test. No
degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the
manufacturer, when the apparatus is used as intended. The performance level may be replaced by a
permissible loss of performance. During the test, degradation of performance is however allowed. No
change of actual operating state or stored data is allowed. If the minimum performance level or the
permissible performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, either of these may be derived from
the product description and documentation and what the user may reasonably expect from the
apparatus if used as intended.

c) Performance criterion C: Temporary loss of function is allowed, provided the function is

self-recoverable or can be restored by the operation of the controls.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 9 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

4. OPERATION OF E.U.T. DURING TESTING

4.1. Operating Modes

The operation modes of the EUT during testing which was decided by the customer was described in
the following :

(1) USB Print : Printing ‘H’ pattern by PC Print (USB Interface)

(2) LAN Print : Printing ‘H’ pattern by PC Print (Network Interface)

Justification : The system was configured in typical fashion (as a customer would normally use it) for
testing.

Y
4.2. Equipment Modifications

O P
No modifications were made by the test laboratory during the tests.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 10 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

4.3. Configuration and peripherals

■EMI

O P Y
No
C
Description of EUT and Support equipment
Description Model Number Serial Number
Brand Name or
Manufacturer
Oki Data
Remarks

A Label Printer N36201B

※1 N/A EUT
Corporation
Hewlett
B Personal Computer HP Compaq 6000 JPA1250B4J
Packard
Hewlett
C Monitor LE1711 3CQ01705M1
Packard
Hewlett
D Mouse M-UAE96 265986-011
Packard
Hewlett
E Keyboard KB-0316 BAUEF0JVBYTDIZ
Packard
Hewlett
F Personal Computer HP ProBook 6550b CNU1251KNV
Packard

G HUB EHC-G08MN-HJB 51L828801295 ELECOM

Hewlett
H AC adapter PPP012H-S F12941113099232
Packard

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 11 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

Cable Description
No Cable Length（m） Shield Connector Remarks
1 AC Cable 1.8 NS Plastic For EUT
2 Monitor Cable 1.8 S Metal with ferrite core
3 Mouse Cable 1.8 S Metal
4 Keyboard Cable 1.8 S Metal
5 USB Cable 5.0 S Metal
6 LAN Cable 5.0 NS Plastic
7 AC Cable 1.8 NS Plastic For PC
8 AC Cable 2.0 NS Plastic For Monitor
9 LAN Cable 2.0 NS Plastic
10 DC Cable 1.8 NS Metal For PC
11 AC Cable 1.8 NS Plastic AC Adepter
12 AC Cable 1.8 NS Plastic For HUB

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 12 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

■EMS

O P Y
C
Description of EUT and Support equipment
Brand Name or
No Description Model Number Serial Number Remarks
Manufacturer
Oki Data
A Label Printer ※1
N36201B N/A EUT
Corporation
Hewlett
B Personal Computer HP Compaq 6000 JPA1250B4J
Packard
Hewlett
C Monitor LE1711 3CQ01705M1
Packard
Hewlett
D Mouse M-UAE96 265986-011
Packard
Hewlett
E Keyboard KB-0316 BAUEF0JVBYTDIZ
Packard

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 13 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

Cable Description
No Cable Length（m） Shield Connector Remarks
1 AC Cable 1.8 NS Plastic For EUT
2 Monitor Cable 1.8 S Metal with ferrite core
3 Mouse Cable 1.8 S Metal
4 Keyboard Cable 1.8 S Metal
5 USB Cable 5.0 S Metal
6 LAN Cable 5.0 NS Plastic
7 AC Cable 1.8 NS Plastic For PC
8 AC Cable 2.0 NS Plastic For Monitor

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 14 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

5. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

5.1. Test Results

EMI
No. Item Test Procedure Limits Worst margin Result
Conducted emission at 25.9dB
Complied
mains terminals and (0.505MHz:L1,AV)
1 EN55032:2015 Class A
telecommunication 30.8dB
Complied
ports (1.528MHz:AV)
12.7dB
Complied
(187.104MHz,Horizontal)
2 Radiated emission EN55032:2015 Class A
10.9dB
Complied
(1499.450MHz,Horizontal

EMS
No. Item Test Procedure Specification Criterion Result

Y
Electrostatic
IEC61000-4-2:2008 ±4kV contact discharge

P
1 discharge B Complied
EN 61000-4-2:2009 ±8kV air discharge
requirements

O
80MHz-1GHz

C
IEC61000-4-3:2006 3V/m(unmodulated)
Radiated RF 1.4GHz-2.0GHz
+A1:2007+A2:2010
2 electromagnetic 3V/m(unmodulated) A Complied
EN 61000-4-3:2006 2.0GHz-2.7GHz
field requirements
+A1:2008+A2:2010 1V/m(unmodulated)
AM, 1kHz, 80%
Electrical fast ±1.0kV(input AC power port)
IEC61000-4-4:2012
3 transient burst ±0.5kV(signal port) B Complied
EN 61000-4-4:2012 5/50ns, 5kHz
requirements
IEC61000-4-5:2014 ±2.0kV
(Line to earth : input AC power port)
Surge immunity +A1:2017
4 ±1.0kV B Complied
requirements EN 61000-4-5:2014 (Line to line : input AC power port)
+A1:2017 1.2/50μs
0.15-80MHz
Conducted RF 3V(unmodulated)
IEC61000-4-6:2013
5 common mode AM, 1kHz, 80% A Complied
EN 61000-4-6:2014 (input AC power port, signal &
requirements
telecommunication port)
Power-frequency
IEC61000-4-8:2009
6 magnetic field 50/60Hz, 3A/m A Complied
EN 61000-4-8:2010
requirements
0%UT/250/300 cycle
IEC61000-4-11:2004 (short interruptions) C
Voltage dips and
+A1:2017 70%UT/25/30 cycle (dips) C
7 short interruptions Complied
EN 61000-4-11:2004 0%UT/1cycle (dips) B
test requirements 0%UT/0.5cycle (dips)
+A1:2017 B
UT is the rated voltage of the EUT.

Oki Engineering hereby confirms that E.U.T., in the configuration tested, complies with the specifications
EN55032:2015 and EN61000-6-1:2007.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 15 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

5.2. Measurement Uncertainty

Conducted Emission Test

Mains port
Probability distribution 150kHz to 30MHz

Combined standard uncertainty Normal ±1.72dB

Expanded uncertainty U Normal
±3.44dB
(level of confidence = 95%) (k = 2)

Telecommunication port
Probability distribution 150kHz to 30MHz

Combined standard uncertainty Normal ±2.51dB

Expanded uncertainty U Normal

Y
±5.03dB
(level of confidence = 95%) (k = 2)

Radiated Emission Test

30MHz to 1GHz

C O
Combined standard uncertainty
Expanded uncertainty U
(level of confidence = 95%)
P Probability distribution
Normal
Normal
(k = 2)
30MHz to 1,000MHz
±2.70dB
±5.40dB

1GHz to 6GHz
Probability distribution 1GHz to 6GHz
Combined standard uncertainty Normal ±2.53dB
Expanded uncertainty U Normal
±5.06dB
(level of confidence = 95%) (k = 2)

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 16 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

5.3. Test Location

Oki Engineering Co., Ltd. EMC Center

1-1, Ojimaminami 4-chome, Honjo-shi, Saitama 367-8686, Japan
Telephone number : +81-495-22-8411
Facsimile number : + 81-495-22-8410

5.4. Test Configuration Photographs

See Appendix 1.

5.5. Data of Test

Y
See Appendix 2.

5.6.

See Appendix 3.

5.7.
C O P
Antenna Beamwidth Specifications

Electric field strength correction

See Appendix 4.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 17 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

6. CONDUCTED EMISSION

6.1. Operating environment

The test was carried out in a semi-anechoic chamber 19.0×10.0×8.0 m.

Temperature : See data

Humidity : See data

6.2. Test configuration

The EUT and connecting equipment was placed on a platform of nominal size, 1m by 1.5m, raised
80cm above the conducting ground plane. The rear of tabletop was located 0.4m to the vertical
conducting plane of 2m by 2m in size. The rear of EUT, including peripherals aligned and flush with

Y
rear of tabletop. All other surfaces of tabletop were at least 80cm from any other grounded conducting

P
surface.

O
I/O cables and AC power cord that were connected to the peripherals were bundled in center. They

C
were folded back and forth forming a bundle 30cm to 40cm long and were hanged at a 40cm height to
the ground plane. Each EUT current-carrying power lead, except the ground(safety) lead, were
individually connected through a AMN to the input power source. All unused 50Ω connectors of the
AMN were resistively terminated in 50Ω when not connected to the measuring equipment.

Reference plane

AC Mains

EUT

AMN ISN
☒ ☒ Metal ground plane

Telecommunication ports

Drawing of the test set-up(Conducted emission)

6.3. Test conditions

Frequency range : 0.15MHz-30MHz

EUT position : ☒Table top ☐Floor standing

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 18 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

6.4. Test equipment used

2
8
4 7
9 6
5

10
3
11

Calibr atio n Calibr atio n

*1 S ign In str u m e n t Mo de l N o . S e rial No . Man u f ac tu r e r
Date U n til

☒ 1 Software EP9/CE V3.2 1511023 TOYO Corp. N/A N/A

Y
2 EMI Test Receiver N9038A 176315 Rohde&Schwarz 2017/11 2018/11
☒

P
☒ 3 RF Selector NS4900 - TOKIN 2018/2 2019/2

O
4 Coaxial Cable Control No.013 - HUBER+SUNER 2018/2 2019/2
☒

C
5 Coaxial Cable Control No.014 - HUBER+SUNER 2018/2 2019/2
☒
☒ 6 Coaxial Cable Control No.012 - SUCOFLEX 2018/2 2019/2

☒ 7 Connector Box N-14 - TOKIN 2018/2 2019/2

☒ 8 AMN PMM L2-16(WT50618) WT50618 Narda 2017/10 2018/10

☒ AMN PMM L2-16(WT50619) WT50619 Narda 2017/11 2018/11

☐ AMN KNW-408(No.2) 8-743-4 Kyoritsu 2018/9 2019/9

☐ AMN KNW-244C(No.4) 8-1428-2 Kyoritsu 2018/5 2019/5

☐ AMN KNW-341C(No.5) 8-702-5 Kyoritsu 2018/5 2019/5

9 Attenuator 10dB 15542 839A minicircuits 2017/10 2018/10

☒
Attenuator 10dB 15542 838B minicircuits 2017/10 2018/10
☐
Attenuator 10dB 6810.01.A(No.2) No.2 HUBER+SUNER 2018/5 2019/5
☐
Attenuator 10dB 6810.01.A(No.4) No.4 HUBER+SUNER 2018/5 2019/5
☐
Attenuator 10dB 6810.01.A(No.5) No.5 HUBER+SUNER 2017/10 2018/10
☐
☒ 50Ωterminator CT-01 - TME 2018/2 2019/2

☐ 10 ISN (for 2wire) FCC-TLISN-T2-02 20347 FCC 2018/2 2019/2

☐ ISN (for 4wire) FCC-TLISN-T4-02 20348 FCC 2018/2 2019/2

☒ ISN (for 8wire) ISN T8-Cat6(26394) 26394 TESEQ 2018/2 2019/2

☐ ISN (for 8wire) ISN T8-Cat6(38901) 38901 TESEQ 2017/11 2018/11

☐ ISN (for 8wire) ISN T800 39200 TESEQ 2017/11 2018/11

☐ Current probe CSP9160A 74768 TESEQ 2018/2 2019/2

Capative Voltage
☐ CVP2200A 37926 TESEQ 2018/2 2019/2
Probe
☒ 11 50Ωterminator CT-01 - TME 2018/2 2019/2

*1 ☒: Equipment was used during the test.

☐: Equipment was not used during the test.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 19 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

6.5. Test procedure

The Conducted emission has been measured with the EUT in a semi-anechoic chamber.
The EUT was connected to a artificial mains network(AMN) .
An overview sweep with peak detection has been performed.
The measurements have been performed with a quasi-peak detector and an average detector.
The EUT was put into operation at Running mode.
The test receiver was used to measure meter reading levels in CISPR Quasi-Peak mode and Average
mode in 0.15 MHz to 30 MHz width in Detector Bandwidth of 9 kHz at 6 dB level.
For each current-carrying conductor is L1 and L2 in this report(L1 is ground one end, L2 is ground the
other end).

6.6. Results

Summary of the test results : Pass

O P Y
C
Date : 2018/8/13 Tested by : H.Shirai

Data of test : see “APPENDIX2: DATA OF TEST”

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 20 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

7. RADIATED EMISSION

7.1. Operating environment

The test was carried out in a semi-anechoic chamber 19.0×10.0×8.0 m.

Temperature : See data

Humidity : See data

7.2. Test configuration

The EUT was placed on the conducting ground plane. The connecting equipments were placed on a
platform, raised 80cm above the conducting ground plane. The rear of EUT, including peripherals

Y
aligned and flush with rear of tabletop. I/O cables that were connected to the peripherals were bundled

P
in center. They were folded back and forth forming a bundle 30cm to 40cm long and were hanged at a

O
40cm height to the ground plane.

[30MHz – 1,000MHz]
[30MHz-1000MHz]

EUT
C [Above 1GHz]
[1GHz-5GHz]

EUT

Absorber

Horizontal metal ground p lane Horizontal metal ground plane

Drawing of the test set-up(Radiated emission)

7.3. Test conditions

Frequency range : 30MHz-1,000MHz, 1GHz-6GHz

Test distance : 10m, 3m
EUT position : ☒Table top ☐Floor standing

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 21 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

7.4. Test equipment used

[30MHz to 1000MHz]

12
2

7
10
5 3
11
6 9
8
4

*1 S ign In str u m e n t

O P Y
Mo de l No . S e r ial No . Man u f ac tu r e r
Calibratio n
Date
C alibr atio n
Un til

C
☒ 1 Software EP5/RE V5.10.10 1511316 TOYO Corp. N/A N/A

2 EMI Test Receiver N9038A MY55330126 Keysight Technologies 2017/11 2018/11

☒
☒ 3 RF Selector NS4900 - TOYO Corp. 2018/2 2019/2

☒ 4 Position Controller 5999X 15011011 TOKIN Pre Check Pre Check

☒ Position Controller 5909E 15011010 TOKIN Pre Check Pre Check

5 Trilog Antenna VULB9168 9168-648 SCHWARZBECK 2017/11 2018/10

☒
6 Preamplifier 310N 354017 Sonoma Instrument 2018/5 2019/5
☒
☒ 7 Attenuator 6dB MP721B M00442 Anritsu 2018/2 2019/2

☒ 8 Coaxial Cable Control No.013 MY1373/4A SUCOFLEX 2018/2 2019/2

9 Coaxial Cable Control No.014 - HUBER+SUNER 2018/2 2019/2

☒
☒ 10 Coaxial Cable Control No.012 504940/6 SUCOFLEX 2018/2 2019/2

☒ 11 Connector Box N-12 - TOKIN 2018/2 2019/2

☒ 12 Semi-Anechoic Room 10m(1511) 15011 TOKIN 2018/2 2019/2

*1 ☒: Equipment was used during the test.

☐: Equipment was not used during the test.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 22 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

[1GHz-6GHz]

2
4
1
5
6 7

Y
Calibratio n C alibr atio n
*1 S ign In str u m e n t Mo de l No . S e r ial No . Man u f ac tu r e r

P
Date Un til

O
☒ 1 Software EP5/RE V5.10.10 1511316 TOYO Corp. N/A N/A

C
2 EMI Test Receiver N9038A MY55330126 Keysight Technologies 2017/11 2018/11
☒
☒ 3 Position Controller 5999X - TOKIN Pre Check Pre Check

☒ 3 Position Controller 5909E - TOKIN Pre Check Pre Check

☒ 4 Horn Antenna 3117 161024 ETS 2017/9 2018/9

☐ Standard Gain Horn 3160-06 1076 EMCO Unnecessary -

☐ Standard Gain Horn 3160-07 1165 EMCO Unnecessary -

☐ Standard Gain Horn 3160-08 1151 EMCO Unnecessary -

☐ Standard Gain Horn 3160-09 1280 EMCO Unnecessary -

☒ 5 Preamplifier TPA0118-36 1501 TOYO Corp. 2018/5 2019/5

6 Microwave Cable Control No.016 (5.0m) 199134/4 HUBER+SUNER 2018/2 2019/2
☒
7 Microwave Cable Control No.015 (0.5m) 199503/4 HUBER+SUNER 2018/2 2019/2
☒
☒ 8 Semi-Anechoic Room 10m(1511) 15011 TOKIN 2018/2 2019/2

*1 ☒: Equipment was used during the test.

☐: Equipment was not used during the test.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 23 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

7.5. Test procedure

The Radiated emission was measured on the semi-anechoic chamber with a ground plane. The
distance between the antenna and EUT for the frequency of 30MHz to 1000MHz was 10m, and for the
frequency of 1GHz to 6GHz was 3m. Measurements were performed with a quasi-peak detector for the
frequency of 30MHz to 1000MHz.
The measuring antenna height for the frequency of 30MHz to 1000MHz was varied between 1 to 4m
was 10m, and for the frequency of 1GHz to 6GHz was fixed to a height of 1m.
The EUT was rotated a full revolution in order to obtain the maximum value of the emission. The
measurements were performed for both vertical and horizontal antenna polarization.
The test receiver was configured to measure meter reading levels in CISPR Quasi-Peak mode for the
frequency of 30MHz to 1000MHz, and in Peak mode and Average mode in 1 MHz resolution bandwidth
for the frequency of 1GHz to 6GHz.

7.6. Results

O P Y
C
Summary of the test results : Pass

Date : 2018/8/7,8/9,8/13 Tested by : H.Shirai

Data of test : see “APPENDIX2: DATA OF TEST”

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 24 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

8. ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE

8.1. Operating environment

The test was carried out in a shielded room 6.8×4.3×2.7m.

Temperature : 24 °C
Humidity : 57 %
Pressure : 1001hPa

8.2. Test configuration

The EUT was placed on a non-metallic table height of 0.8m above a reference ground plane.

O P Y Vertical coupling plane(0.5m×0.5m)

C
0.1m
ESD-gun 20mm EUT
Insulating support(0.5mm thick)
470kΩ

470kΩ ・ 470kΩ

・・
Horizontal coupling plane(1.6m×0.8m)
470kΩ
470kΩ
ESD
・ ・
Metal ground plane

Drawing of the test set-up(Electrostatic discharge)

8.3. Test conditions

Test levels : ±2kV and ±4kV contact discharge

: ±2kV, ±4kV and ±8kV air discharge
Performance criterion :B
Number of discharges : 10
Number of Test points : 96
EUT position : ☒Table top ☐Floor standing

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 25 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

8.4. Test equipment used

Ca lib r atio n C alibr atio n

*1 In str u m e n t Mo de l N o . Se r ial No . Man u f ac tu r e r
Date Un til

☒ ESD Simulator NSG437 169 TESEQ 2017/12 2018/12

☐ ESD SIMULATOR ESS-S3011 ESS1367090 Noiseken 2018/5 2019/5

*1 ☒: Equipment was used during the test.

☐: Equipment was not used during the test.

8.5. Test procedure

The EUT was put into operation at Running mode at each selected test point 10 discharges were fired

Y
beginning with 2kV.

P
Each 10 discharges were applied to both of negative and positive polarity about contact discharge

O
testing.

C
The performance of the EUT was monitored continuously.

8.6. Results

The test was carried out according to the test protocol in the following table.

Summary of the test results : Pass

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 26 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

Table of test protocol(Electrostatic discharge)

Date : 2018/8/24 Tested by : H.Shirai

1)Indirect discharge
Discharge Point Test level(kV) Comments Pass/Fail
Horizontal Coupling plane ±2 Normal Function(*3) Pass
(*1) ±4 Normal Function(*3) Pass
Vertical Coupling plane ±2 Normal Function(*3) Pass
(*2) ±4 Normal Function(*3) Pass
(*1) Discharged on a front edge of Horizontal coupling plane opposite the center of EUT’s front, rear,
right and left sides.
(*2) Discharged on the four faces(front, rear, right and left of EUT) by using Vertical coupling plane.
(*3) There was no difference in the result between USB and LAN mode.
2)Direct discharge

Y
Discharge Point Test level(kV) Comments Pass/Fail Picture No.
d1-d19 ±2 Normal Function(*3) Pass Picture 1

P
(Screw) ±4 Normal Function(*3) Pass

O
d20-d50 ±2 Normal Function(*3) Pass Picture 2

C
(Screw) ±4 Normal Function(*3) Pass
d51-d63 ±2 Normal Function(*3) Pass Picture 3
(Screw) ±4 Normal Function(*3) Pass
d64-d78 ±2 Normal Function(*3) Pass Picture 4
(Screw) ±4 Normal Function(*3) Pass
d79-d85 ±2 Normal Function(*3) Pass Picture 5
(Screw) ±4 Normal Function(*3) Pass
d86-d88 ±2 Normal Function(*3) Pass Picture 6
(Screw, etc) ±4 Normal Function(*3) Pass
(*3) There was no difference in the result between USB and LAN mode.

3)Air discharge
There was no air discharge point.
Note : Air discharge area(R1 to R7) is found in Picture 7 to 10.
Pictures of ESD points: See “APPENDIX2: DATA OF TEST”

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 27 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

9. RADIO-FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD

9.1. Operating environment

The test was carried out in a semi-anechoic chamber 19.0×10.0×8.0 m.

Temperature : 23°C
Humidity : 54%

9.2. Test configuration

The EUT was placed on a non-metallic table height of 0.8m with the lines placed horizontally.
Test was carried out with the front, right, rear and left of the EUT facing the antenna.

Y
☐ Full anechoic chamber

P
☒ Semi anechoic chamber
Shielded room

EUT

C O ☒ Absorber
Amp.

Drawing of the test set-up(Radio-frequency electromagnetic field)

9.3. Test conditions

Frequency range : 80MHz-1,000MHz,1.4GHz-2.0GHz,2.0GHz-2.7GHz

Test level : 3V/m,3V/m,1V/m (unmodulated)
Modulation : AM, 1kHz, 80%
Performance criterion :A
Frequency step size : 1%
Dwell time : 1sec
Field orientation : Horizontal and Vertical
Antenna distance : 3m
Antenna height : 1.5m(80MHz-1,000MHz,), 1.1m(1.4GHz-2.7GHz)
EUT position : ☒Table top ☐Floor standing
Size of EUT : 1049(W)×341(D)×451(H)mm

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 28 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

9.4. Test equipment used

1
9
7
8
2

3 4

5 5

6 6

P Y
Ca lib r atio n Calib r atio n
*1 S ig n In str u m e n t Mo de l N o . S e r ial No . Man u f ac tu r e r

O
Date Un til

C
☒ 1 Signal Generator SMB100A 110358 Rohde&Schwarz 2018/8 2019/8

☒ 2 RF Relay Mtrix - 4531 TSJ Pre Check Pre Check

Power Amplifier
☒ 3 BBA150(BC1000) 101964 Rohde&Schwarz 2018/8 2019/8
(80-1,000MHz)

Power Amplifier
☒ 4 BBA150(D110E100) 101974 Rohde&Schwarz 2018/8 2019/8
(1-6GHz)

☒ NRP-Z91(103120) 103120 Rohde&Schwarz 2018/8 2019/8

5 Power Senser
☒ NRP-Z91(103119) 103119 Rohde&Schwarz 2018/8 2019/8

☒ 6 Power Meter NRP2 104564 Rohde&Schwarz 2018/8 2019/8

☒ 7 Isotropic Field Prove HI-6105(203619) 203619 ETS-Lindgren 2017/12 2018/12

Log-Periodic Antenna
☒ 8 STLP9128D 3004 Schwarzbeck Pre Check Pre Check
(80-1,000MHz)

☒ 9 Horn Antenna BBHA9120E 0899 Schwarzbeck Pre Check Pre Check

*1 ☒: Equipment was used during the test.

☐: Equipment was not used during the test.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 29 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

9.5. Generation of the electromagnetic field

The electromagnetic field is generated from a computer controlled signal generator. The output power
is amplified and then radiated from broad band Log-Periodic antenna.
At every test frequency the field strength is checked prior to the actual test by placing the field sensor
at the same distance from and in the same relative location to, the field generating antenna, as will be
used by the EUT.

9.6. Test procedure

The EUT was put into operation at Running mode.

The verification of performance was established by monitoring the EUT under Running mode with a
video camera during the test.

Y
The test for each mode was two polarizations, two antennas and each side of the EUT facing the

P
antenna.

9.7. Results

C O
The test protocol is found in the following table.

Summary of the test results : Pass

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 30 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

Table of test protocol(Radio-frequency electromagnetic field)

Date : 2018/8/14 Tested by : H.Shirai

Frequency Polarization Test level

Comment Pass/Fail
(MHz) Ver/Hor (V/m)
H 3 Normal Function(*1) Pass
80-1,000
V 3 Normal Function(*1) Pass
H 3 Normal Function(*1) Pass
1,400-2,000
V 3 Normal Function(*1) Pass
H 1 Normal Function(*1) Pass
2,000-2,700
V 1 Normal Function(*1) Pass
(*1) There was no difference in the result between USB and LAN mode.

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 31 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

10. ELECTRICAL FAST TRANSIENT/BURST

10.1. Operating environment

The test was carried out in a shielded room 6.8×4.3×2.7m.

Temperature : 23°C
Humidity : 56 %

10.2. Test configuration

The EUT was placed on a non-metallic palette height of 0.1m above the reference ground plane.

Y
Direct injection Clamp injection

P
EUT

O
Burst Burst EUT

C
Generator Generator Clamp

Metal ground plane Metal ground plane

Drawing of the test set-up(Electrical fast transient/burst)

10.3. Test conditions

Test level : ☒±1.0kV/AC power port

: ☒±0.5kV/I/O signal/control
Performance criterion :B
Repetition rate : 5kHz
Duration of each test : 60seconds
EUT position : Floor standing

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 32 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

10.4. Test equipment used

Ca lib r atio n C alibr atio n

*1 In str u m e n t Mo de l N o . Se r ial No . Man u f ac tu r e r
Date Un til

☐ EMC TESTER IMU4000 1545 EMC PARTNER 2018/5 2019/5

☐ Coupling network CN-EFT1000 CN-EFT1000-1612 EMC PARTNER Pre Check Pre Check

Three Phase Coupling

☐ CDN2000A-06-32 1520 EMC PARTNER 2018/5 2019/5
Network

FAST TRANSIENT/ NOISE

☒ FNS-AX3-B50B FNS1130982 2018/5 2019/5
BURST GENERATOR LABORATORY

NOISE
☒ COUPLING CLAMP 1500001A - Pre Check Pre Check
LABORATORY

Y
☐ ARTIFICIAL HAND EMC003 - OEG 2018/5 2019/5

O P
☐ ARTIFICIAL HAND EMC004 - OEG 2018/5 2019/5

C
☐ Multifunction Generator NSG3040 2274 TESEQ 2018/5 2019/5

☐ COUPLING CLAMP CDN3245 2016 TESEQ 2018/5 2019/5

*1 ☒: Equipment was used during the test.

☐: Equipment was not used during the test.

10.5. Test procedure

The EUT was put into operation at Running mode.

The test voltage was applied to each cable for 60 seconds.
The performance of the EUT was monitored continuously.

10.6. Results

The test protocol is found in the following table.

Summary of the test results : Pass

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 33 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

Table of test protocol(Electrical fast transient/burst)

Date : 2018/8/15 Tested by : H.Shirai

1) AC power port :
Test level
Test line Comment Pass/Fail
(kV)
AC Cable L ±1.0 Normal Function(*1) Pass
N ±1.0 Normal Function(*1) Pass
PE ±1.0 Normal Function(*1) Pass
N+L+ PE ±1.0 Normal Function(*1) Pass

2) I/O signal/control ports :

Y
Test level
Test line Comment Pass/Fail
(kV)

P
USB cable ±0.5 Normal Function(*1) Pass

C O
LAN cable ±0.5 Normal Function(*1) Pass

(*1) There was no difference in the result between USB and LAN mode.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 34 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

11. SURGE

11.1. Operating environment

The test was carried out in a shielded room 6.8×4.3×2.7m.

Temperature : 23°C
Humidity : 62 %

11.2. Test configuration

The EUT was placed on a non-metallic table height of 0.8m above the reference ground plane.

Y
AC or DC power line Signal/control line

P
☒ (L or L1) EUT
☐ (Signal/control line)

O
☒ (N or L2)
☐ (L3) ☐ (PE)

C
☐ (＋)
☐ (−) Metalplate
Test Test
Generator ☒ (PE) Generator
☐ (PE) ☐ (PE)

Drawing of the test set-up(Surge)

11.3. Test conditions

Test level : line to earth ±2.0kV/Input AC power port

: line to line ±1.0kV/Input AC power port
Polarity : Positive/Negative
Phase shifting : 0°, 90°,180°and 270° phase angle(degree)
Performance criterion :B
Repetition rate : 1minute
Number of test : 5 points
EUT position : ☒Table top ☐Floor standing

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 35 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

11.4. Test equipment used

Ca lib r atio n C alibr atio n

*1 In str u m e n t Mo de l N o . Se r ial No . Man u f ac tu r e r
Date Un til

LIGHTNING SURGE NOISE

☐ LSS-15AX-C3A LSS0660607 2018/5 2019/5
SIMULATOR LABORATORY

LIGHTNING SURGE NOISE

☒ LSS-F03C3 LSS1534049 2018/5 2019/5
SIMULATOR LABORATORY

☐ Multifunction Generator NSG3040 2274 TESEQ 2018/5 2019/5

☐ EMC TESTER IMU4000 1545 EMC PARTNER 2018/5 2019/5

Three Phase Coupling

☐ CDN2000A-06-32 1520 EMC PARTNER 2018/5 2019/5
Network

Y
☐ Surge coupling Network CDN-UTP ED3 1512 EMC PARTNER 2018/5 2019/5

P
*1 ☒: Equipment was used during the test.

O
☐: Equipment was not used during the test.

11.5. Test procedure

C
The EUT was put into operation at Running mode.
The test voltage was applied to each port.
The performance of the EUT was monitored continuously.

11.6. Results

The test protocol is found in the following table.

Summary of the test results : Pass

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 36 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

Table of test protocol(Surge)

Date : 2018/8/23 Tested by : H.Shirai

1) AC power port :
Line to line : (L - N)
Test level
Test line Comment Pass/Fail
(kV)
AC Cable ±0.5 Normal Function(*1) Pass

±1.0 Normal Function(*1) Pass

Line to line : (N - L)
Test level
Test line Comment Pass/Fail

Y
(kV)

P
AC Cable ±0.5 Normal Function(*1) Pass

O
±1.0 Normal Function(*1) Pass

AC Cable C
Line to earth : (L - PE)
Test line
Test level
(kV)
±0.5
±1.0
±2.0
Comment

Normal Function(*1)
Normal Function(*1)
Normal Function(*1)
Pass/Fail

Pass
Pass
Pass

Line to earth : (N - PE)

Test level
Test line Comment Pass/Fail
(kV)
AC Cable ±0.5 Normal Function(*1) Pass
±1.0 Normal Function(*1) Pass
±2.0 Normal Function(*1) Pass

(*1) There was no difference in the result between USB and LAN mode.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 37 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

12. RADIO-FREQUENCY CONDUCTED DISTURBANCES

12.1. Operating environment

The test was carried out in a shielded room 6.8×4.3×2.7m.

Temperature : 23°C
Humidity : 56 %

12.2. Test configuration

The EUT was placed on a non-metallic pallet height of 0.1m above the reference ground plane.

Y
Direct injection Clamp injection

O P
Test Test
Generator Generator

C
Power attenuator Power attenuator
(6dB) (6dB)
0.3m Termination 0.3m 0.3m 0.3m
50Ω EUT
EUT Injection clamp
or
CDN CDN BCI probe

Metal ground plane Metal ground plane

50mm 50mm

Drawing of the test set-up(Radio-frequency conducted disturbances)

12.3. Test conditions

Frequency range : 0.15MHz-80MHz

Test level : 3V(unmodulated)
Modulation : AM, 1kHz, 80%
Performance criterion :A
Frequency step size : 1%
Dwell time : 1sec
EUT position : Floor standing
EUT comprising : Multiple unit
Size of EUT : 1049(W)×341(D)×451(H)mm

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 38 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

12.4. Test equipment used

1 2

6
EUT

4 3
8 ５
6 7
EUT AE

9
EUT AE

10
EUT

Y
Calibratio n Calibr atio n
*1 Sign In stru m e n t Mo de l N o . S e rial No . Man u f actu re r
Date Un til

P
☒ 1 Signal Generator N5181A MY47071183 Agilent 2018/5 2019/5

O
☒ 2 RF Power Amplifier R275LC-CE 8511-1 RF Power Labs 2018/8 2019/8

C
☒ 3 High Power Attenuator 45-6-33 LJ904 Weinschel 2018/8 2019/8

☒ 4 Power Meter NRVD(CS) 826224/024 Rohde&Schwarz 2018/8 2019/8

☒ 5 100V Insertion Unit URV5-Z4 100662 Rohde&Schwarz 2018/8 2019/8

Power Line Coupling
☐ TSCDN-M2-16A 9883 TSJ 2018/5 2019/5
Decoupling Network
Power Line Coupling
☐ TSCDN-M2-32A 9881 TSJ 2018/5 2019/5
Decoupling Network
Power Line Coupling
☐ 6 TSCDN-M1-16A(No.1) 9879 TSJ 2018/5 2019/5
Decoupling Network
Power Line Coupling
☐ TSCDN-M1-16A(No.2) 9880 TSJ 2018/4 2019/4
Decoupling Network
Power Line Coupling
☐ TSCDN-M3-32A(No.1) 06036 TSJ 2018/4 2019/4
Decoupling Network
Power Line Coupling
☒ TSCDN-M3-32A(No.2) 06037 TSJ 2018/5 2019/5
Decoupling Network

☒ 7 EM Injection Clamp TSIC-23 176 TSJ 2018/4 2019/4

☒ 8 50Ω terminator CT-01 - TME 2018/2 2019/2

Bullk Current Injection
☐ 9 TSBC-120-9 156 TSJ 2018/5 2019/5
Probe

☐ 10 ARTIFICIAL HAND EMC003 - OEG 2018/5 2019/5

☐ ARTIFICIAL HAND EMC004 - OEG 2018/5 2019/5

*1 ☒: Equipment was used during the test.

☐: Equipment was not used during the test.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 39 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

12.5. Test procedure

The EUT was put into operation at Running mode.

The test electromagnetic field was applied to each port via injection equipment.
The performance of the EUT was monitored continuously.

12.6. Results

The test protocol is found in the following table.

Summary of the test results : Pass

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 40 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

Table of test protocol(Radio-frequency conducted disturbances)

Date : 2018/8/15 Tested by : H.Shirai

Test line Test level (V) Injection method Comment Pass/Fail

AC Cable 3 CDN Normal Function(*1) Pass
USB cable 3 EM CLAMP Normal Function(*1) Pass
LAN cable 3 EM CLAMP Normal Function(*1) Pass

(*1) There was no difference in the result between USB and LAN mode.

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 41 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

13. POWER FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD

13.1. Operating environment

The test was carried out in a shielded room 6.8×4.3×2.7m.

Temperature : 24°C
Humidity : 59 %

13.2. Test configuration

The EUT was placed on a non-metallic table height of 0.8m above the reference ground plane.

Y
EUT

Transformer

C
Metal ground plane

O P
Drawing of the test set-up(Power frequency magnetic field)

13.3. Test conditions

Frequency range : 50/60Hz

Test level : 3A/m
Performance criterion :A
EUT position : ☒Table top ☐Floor standing

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 42 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

13.4. Test equipment used

Ca lib r atio n C alibr atio n

*1 In str u m e n t Mo de l N o . Se r ial No . Man u f ac tu r e r
Date Un til

Wandel &
☒ EM-Field Analyzer EFA-2 F-0018 2018/2 2019/2
Goltermann

Wandel &
☒ B-FIELD SENSOR BN2245/90.10 F-0032 2018/2 2019/2
Goltermann

☒ Induction coil - EMC001 OEG Pre Check Pre Check

☐ Induction coil - EMC002 OEG Pre Check Pre Check

☐ Helm Holts coil - - TSJ Pre Check Pre Check

Y
☐ EMC TESTER IMU4000 1545 EMC PARTNER 2018/5 2019/5

O P
☐ Inductive coil IMU3000 MF1000-1-1547 EMC PARTNER Pre Check Pre Check

C
☐ Multifunction Generator NSG3040 2274 TESEQ 2018/5 2019/5

☐ Inductive coil INA702 314 TESEQ Pre Check Pre Check

*1 ☒: Equipment was used during the test.

☐: Equipment was not used during the test.

13.5. Test procedure

The EUT was put into operation at Running mode.

The test power frequency magnetic field was applied to EUT via inductive coil.
The performance of the EUT was monitored continuously.

13.6. Results

The test protocol is found in the following Table.

Summary of the test results : Pass

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 43 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

Table of test protocol(Power frequency magnetic field)

Date : 2018/8/16 Tested by : H.Shirai

Frequency Test level

Direction Comment Pass/Fail
(Hz) (A/m)
50 3 Front-Rear Normal Function(*1) Pass
3 Right-Left Normal Function(*1) Pass
3 Top-Bottom Normal Function(*1) Pass
60 3 Front-Rear Normal Function(*1) Pass
3 Right-Left Normal Function(*1) Pass
3 Top-Bottom Normal Function(*1) Pass
(*1) There was no difference in the result between USB and LAN mode.

O P Y
C
EUT EUT EUT
H H
∼ H
∼
∼

a : Front - Rear b : Right - Left c : Top - Bottom

Direction of induction coil

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 44 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

14. VOLTAGE DIPS AND SHORT INTERRUPTIONS

14.1. Operating environment

The test was carried out in a shielded room 6.8×4.3×2.7m.

Temperature : 23°C
Humidity : 70 %

14.2. Test configuration

The EUT was placed on a non-metallic table height of 0.8m above the reference ground plane.

Y
EUT

Dip
simulator

C O P
Drawing of the test set-up(Voltage dips and short interruptions)

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 45 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

14.3. Test conditions

(1)Short Interruption
Test level
: 0% UT/250/300cycle
Voltage / duration
UT is the rated voltage of the EUT.
Phase angle of insertion : 0°
Number of events :3
Recovery time between pulses : 10seconds
Performance criterion :C

(2)Voltage dips
Test level

Y
Voltage / duration : 0% UT/0.5cycle

P
: 0% UT/1cycle

O
: 70% UT/25/30cycle

C
UT is the rated voltage of the EUT.
Phase angle of insertion : 0°
Number of events : 3 at each level
Recovery time between pulses : 10seconds
Performance criterion : B(0%UT)
: C(70%UT)

EUT position : ☒Table top ☐Floor standing

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 46 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

14.4. Test equipment used

Ca lib r atio n C alibr atio n

*1 In str u m e n t Mo de l N o . Se r ial No . Man u f ac tu r e r
Date Un til

Voltage Dip and

☐ VDS-2002 VDS12Z0362 Noiseken 2018/5 2019/5
Swell Simulator

☐ EMC TESTER IMU4000 1545 EMC PARTNER 2018/5 2019/5

NF Electronic
☒ CVCF ES12000W 9198496 Pre check Pre check
Instruments

NF Electronic
☐ CVCF ES2000U 9193358 Pre check Pre check
Instruments

NF Electronic
☐ CVCF ES2000B 9193358 Pre check Pre check
Instruments

Y
☐ Multifunction Generator NSG3040 2274 TESEQ 2018/5 2019/5

P
*1 ☒: Equipment was used during the test.

O
☐: Equipment was not used during the test.

14.5. Test procedure

C
The EUT was put into operation at Running mode.
The dips and interruptions is generated with the dip simulator.
The performance of the EUT was monitored continuously.

14.6. Results

The test protocol is found in the following table.

Summary of the test results : Pass

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 47 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

Table of test protocol(Voltage dips and short interruptions)

Date : 2018/8/16 Tested by : H.Shirai

50Hz:
Test level Phase angle of
cycle Comment Pass/Fail
(residual) insertion
0% 0° 250 (*1)(*2) Pass
0% 0° 0.5 Normal Function(*2) Pass
0% 0° 1 Normal Function(*2) Pass
70% 0° 25 Normal Function(*2) Pass

60Hz:

P Y
Test level Phase angle of
cycle Comment Pass/Fail

O
(residual) insertion

C
0% 0° 300 (*1)(*2) Pass
0% 0° 0.5 Normal Function(*2) Pass
0% 0° 1 Normal Function(*2) Pass
70% 0° 30 Normal Function(*2) Pass

(*1) EUT turned off during the test and restored manually after the test.
(*2) There was no difference in the result between USB and LAN mode.

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 48 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

APPENDIX1: TEST CONFIGURATION PHOTOGRAPHS

This section contains the following photographs:

Page 49 : Conducted emission

Page 50 : Radiated emission

Page 51 : Electrostatic discharge

Page 52 : Radio-frequency electromagnetic field

Page 53 : Electrical fast transient/burst

Page 54 : Surge

O P Y
C
Page 55 : Radio-frequency conducted disturbances

Page 56 : Power frequency magnetic field

Page 57 : Voltage dips and short interruptions

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 49 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

Conducted emission

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 50 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

Radiated emission

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 51 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

Electrostatic discharge

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 52 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

Radio-frequency electromagnetic field

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 53 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

Electrical fast transient/burst

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 54 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

Surge

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 55 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

Radio-frequency conducted disturbances

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 56 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

Power frequency magnetic field

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 57 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

Voltage dips and short interruptions

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 58 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

APPENDIX2: DATA OF TEST

This section contains the following data:

Page 59 to 62 : Conducted emission test

Page 63 to 68 : Radiated emission test

Page 69 to 75 : Electromagnetic Discharge

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 59 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

OKI Engineering <<LINE CONDUCTION>> 13 August,2018 14:56

EMC Center

File No. : 182013 Limit : EN 55032 Class A

Model Name : Label Printer Temperature : 24℃
Model No. : N36201B Humidity : 56％
S/N : - Operator : H.Shirai
Power Supply : AC230V 50Hz Comment : T-16C
[dB(μV)]
90 <EN55032 ClassA>
Limit(QP)
Limit(AV)
80 <T-16C>
Peak(L1, PK)
Peak(L2, PK)
70 Lavel(L1, QP)
Level(L1, AV)
Level(L2, QP)
60 Level(L2, AV)

50

40

Y
30

P
20

O
10

C
0
0.1500 0.5000 1.0000 5.0000 10.0000 30.0000
Frequwncy [MHz]

Final Result
--- L1 (QP) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.226 25.4 10.1 35.5 79.0 43.5
2 0.505 31.4 10.1 41.5 73.0 31.5
3 1.009 29.1 10.1 39.2 73.0 33.8
4 1.515 28.1 10.1 38.2 73.0 34.8
5 29.726 16.8 10.5 27.3 73.0 45.7
--- L1 (AV) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.226 12.1 10.1 22.2 66.0 43.8
2 0.505 24.0 10.1 34.1 60.0 25.9
3 1.009 21.0 10.1 31.1 60.0 28.9
4 1.515 20.1 10.1 30.2 60.0 29.8
5 29.726 9.9 10.5 20.4 60.0 39.6
--- L2 (QP) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.156 28.2 10.0 38.2 79.0 40.8
2 0.217 23.9 10.0 33.9 79.0 45.1
3 0.507 30.1 10.0 40.1 73.0 32.9
4 1.011 29.8 10.1 39.9 73.0 33.1
5 1.517 28.0 10.1 38.1 73.0 34.9
6 2.021 27.6 10.2 37.8 73.0 35.2
--- L2 (AV) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.156 10.5 10.0 20.5 66.0 45.5
2 0.217 13.9 10.0 23.9 66.0 42.1
3 0.507 22.8 10.0 32.8 60.0 27.2
4 1.011 21.8 10.1 31.9 60.0 28.1
5 1.517 20.2 10.1 30.3 60.0 29.7
6 2.021 19.9 10.2 30.1 60.0 29.9

Conducted emission test :USB

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 60 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

OKI Engineering <<LINE CONDUCTION>> 13 August,2018 15:19

EMC Center

File No. : 182013 Limit : EN 55032 Class A

Model Name : Label Printer Temperature : 24℃
Model No. : N36201B Humidity : 56％
S/N : - Operator : H.Shirai
Power Supply : AC230V 50Hz Comment : T-17C
[dB(μV)]
90 <EN55032 ClassA>
Limit(QP)
Limit(AV)
80 <T-17C>
Peak(L1, PK)
Peak(L2, PK)
70 Lavel(L1, QP)
Level(L1, AV)
Level(L2, QP)
60 Level(L2, AV)

50

40

Y
30

P
20

O
10

C
0
0.1500 0.5000 1.0000 5.0000 10.0000 30.0000
Frequwncy [MHz]

Final Result
--- L1 (QP) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.153 21.2 10.1 31.3 79.0 47.7
2 0.505 31.0 10.1 41.1 73.0 31.9
3 1.011 29.4 10.1 39.5 73.0 33.5
4 1.981 19.2 10.1 29.3 73.0 43.7
5 29.311 15.0 10.5 25.5 73.0 47.5
--- L1 (AV) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.153 9.9 10.1 20.0 66.0 46.0
2 0.505 23.7 10.1 33.8 60.0 26.2
3 1.011 21.4 10.1 31.5 60.0 28.5
4 1.981 12.9 10.1 23.0 60.0 37.0
5 29.311 6.2 10.5 16.7 60.0 43.3
--- L2 (QP) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.154 27.7 10.0 37.7 79.0 41.3
2 0.208 23.9 10.0 33.9 79.0 45.1
3 0.506 30.0 10.0 40.0 73.0 33.0
4 1.011 29.8 10.1 39.9 73.0 33.1
5 2.022 27.4 10.2 37.6 73.0 35.4
--- L2 (AV) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.154 10.5 10.0 20.5 66.0 45.5
2 0.208 16.9 10.0 26.9 66.0 39.1
3 0.506 22.8 10.0 32.8 60.0 27.2
4 1.011 21.7 10.1 31.8 60.0 28.2
5 2.022 19.7 10.2 29.9 60.0 30.1

Conducted emission test :LAN

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 61 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

OKI Engineering <<LINE CONDUCTION>> 13 August,2018 15:46

EMC Center

File No. : 182013 Limit : EN55032 ClassA(tel）

Model Name : Label Printer Temperature : 24℃
Model No. : N36201B Humidity : 56％
S/N : - Operator : H.Shirai
Power Supply : AC230V 50Hz Comment : T-18C
[dB(μV)]
100 <EN55032 ClassA(tel）>
Limit(QP)
90 Limit(AV)
<T-18C>
Peak(Tel, PK)
80 Lavel(Tel, QP)
Level(Tel, AV)

70

60

50

40

Y
30

P
20

C O
10

0
0.1500 0.5000 1.0000 5.0000 10.0000 30.0000
Frequwncy [MHz]

Final Result
--- Tel (QP) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.284 19.0 9.6 28.6 91.7 63.1
2 1.019 30.3 9.4 39.7 87.0 47.3
3 1.528 36.2 9.4 45.6 87.0 41.4
4 3.559 28.9 9.4 38.3 87.0 48.7
5 11.031 25.0 9.6 34.6 87.0 52.4
6 17.127 27.1 9.9 37.0 87.0 50.0
7 29.490 29.9 10.4 40.3 87.0 46.7
--- Tel (AV) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.284 8.9 9.6 18.5 78.7 60.2
2 1.019 26.6 9.4 36.0 74.0 38.0
3 1.528 33.8 9.4 43.2 74.0 30.8
4 3.559 22.9 9.4 32.3 74.0 41.7
5 11.031 4.7 9.6 14.3 74.0 59.7
6 17.127 17.0 9.9 26.9 74.0 47.1
7 29.490 2.3 10.4 12.7 74.0 61.3

Conducted emission test :USB

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 62 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

OKI Engineering <<LINE CONDUCTION>> 13 August,2018 15:58

EMC Center

File No. : 182013 Limit : EN55032 ClassA(tel）

Model Name : Label Printer Temperature : 24℃
Model No. : N36201B Humidity : 56％
S/N : - Operator : H.Shirai
Power Supply : AC230V 50Hz Comment : T-19C
[dB(μV)]
100 <EN55032 ClassA(tel）>
Limit(QP)
90 Limit(AV)
<T-19C>
Peak(Tel, PK)
80 Lavel(Tel, QP)
Level(Tel, AV)

70

60

50

40

Y
30

P
20

C O
10

0
0.1500 0.5000 1.0000 5.0000 10.0000 30.0000
Frequwncy [MHz]

Final Result
--- Tel (QP) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.491 25.3 9.5 34.8 87.2 52.4
2 0.690 28.6 9.5 38.1 87.0 48.9
3 1.517 31.5 9.4 40.9 87.0 46.1
4 1.822 28.8 9.4 38.2 87.0 48.8
5 3.658 17.0 9.4 26.4 87.0 60.6
6 10.269 27.0 9.6 36.6 87.0 50.4
7 14.529 30.7 9.7 40.4 87.0 46.6
8 29.613 34.3 10.4 44.7 87.0 42.3
--- Tel (AV) ---
No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB] [dB(μV)] [dB(μV)] [dB]
1 0.491 19.7 9.5 29.2 74.2 45.0
2 0.690 24.9 9.5 34.4 74.0 39.6
3 1.517 28.2 9.4 37.6 74.0 36.4
4 1.822 27.4 9.4 36.8 74.0 37.2
5 3.658 8.7 9.4 18.1 74.0 55.9
6 10.269 10.2 9.6 19.8 74.0 54.2
7 14.529 15.2 9.7 24.9 74.0 49.1
8 29.613 15.5 10.4 25.9 74.0 48.1

Conducted emission test :LAN

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 63 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

OKI Engineering <<RADIATED EMISSION>> 7 August,2018 15:02

EMC Center

File No. : 182013 Limit : EN55032 ClassA(10m)

Model Name : Label Printer Temperature : 21℃
Model No. : N36201B Humidity : 62％
S/N : - Operator : H.Shirai
Power Supply : AC230V 50Hz Comment : T-4
[dB(μV/m)]
70
<EN55032 ClassA(10m)>
Limit(QP)
<T-4>
60 Horizontal(PK)
Vertical(PK)
Horizontal(QP)
50 Vertical(QP)

40
Level

30

P Y
20

O
10

C
0
30.000 50.000 100.000 500.000 1000.000
Frequency [MHz]

Final Result

--- Horizontal Polarization (QP)---

No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Height Angle Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB(1/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB] [cm] [°]
1 81.176 37.9 -15.7 22.2 40.0 17.8 400.0 83.0
2 196.118 39.4 -13.3 26.1 40.0 13.9 386.5 70.0
3 301.105 34.5 -9.0 25.5 47.0 21.5 235.5 90.0

--- Vertical Polarization (QP)---

No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Height Angle Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB(1/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB] [cm] [°]
1 35.721 30.2 -12.5 17.7 40.0 22.3 117.6 161.0
2 55.041 27.2 -11.2 16.0 40.0 24.0 207.7 94.0
3 250.562 34.7 -11.1 23.6 47.0 23.4 100.3 344.0

Radiated emission test :USB

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 64 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

OKI Engineering <<RADIATED EMISSION>> 9 August,2018 10:05

EMC Center

File No. : 182013 Limit : EN55032 ClassA(10m)

Model Name : Label Printer Temperature : 22℃
Model No. : N36201B Humidity : 67％
S/N : - Operator : H.Shirai
Power Supply : AC230V 50Hz Comment : T-7
[dB(μV/m)]
70
<EN55032 ClassA(10m)>
Limit(QP)
<T-7>
60 Horizontal(PK)
Vertical(PK)
Horizontal(QP)
50 Vertical(QP)

40
Level

30

P Y
20

O
10

C
0
30.000 50.000 100.000 500.000 1000.000
Frequency [MHz]

Final Result

--- Horizontal Polarization (QP)---

No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Height Angle Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB(1/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB] [cm] [°]
1 187.104 39.7 -12.4 27.3 40.0 12.7 373.0 64.0
2 301.102 35.6 -9.0 26.6 47.0 20.4 260.8 229.0

--- Vertical Polarization (QP)---

No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Height Angle Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB(1/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB] [cm] [°]
1 37.249 29.8 -12.2 17.6 40.0 22.4 103.2 200.0
2 52.489 27.6 -11.1 16.5 40.0 23.5 264.8 94.0
3 125.021 39.7 -12.5 27.2 40.0 12.8 134.6 18.0
4 187.147 35.0 -12.4 22.6 40.0 17.4 100.1 187.0

Radiated emission test: LAN

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 65 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

OKI Engineering <<RADIATED EMISSION>> 13 August,2018 13:07

EMC Center

File No. : 182013 Limit : EN55032 ClassA(3m)

Model Name : Label Printer Temperature : 24℃
Model No. : N36201B Humidity : 56％
S/N : - Operator : H.Shirai
Power Supply : AC230V 50Hz Comment : T-14G
[dB(μV/m)]
90
<EN55032 ClassA(3m) 1-6GHz>
Limit(PK)
80 Limit(AV)
<T-14G>
Horizontal(PK)
70 Vertical(PK)
Selected Freq(H)
60 Selected Freq(V)

50
Level

40

Y
30

O P
20

C
10

0
1000.000 2000.000 3000.000 4000.000 6000.000
Frequency [MHz]

Spectrum Selection

--- Horizontal Polarization ---

No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
PK PK PK
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB(1/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB]
1 1199.400 53.7 -3.5 50.2 76.0 25.8
2 1499.300 68.6 -4.3 64.3 76.0 11.7
3 1592.300 58.6 -3.7 54.9 76.0 21.1
4 2389.350 54.8 0.7 55.5 76.0 20.5
5 2797.650 52.5 1.1 53.6 76.0 22.4
6 2986.100 50.2 2.0 52.2 76.0 23.8
7 5100.000 46.9 4.6 51.5 80.0 28.5

--- Vertical Polarization ---

No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
PK PK PK
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB(1/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB]
1 1063.150 54.9 -4.6 50.3 76.0 25.7
2 1499.500 54.5 -4.3 50.2 76.0 25.8
3 2398.750 54.4 0.8 55.2 76.0 20.8
4 3000.150 49.3 2.0 51.3 80.0 28.7
5 5988.100 47.2 4.8 52.0 80.0 28.0

Radiated emission test: USB

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 66 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

OKI Engineering <<RADIATED EMISSION>> 13 August,2018 13:07

EMC Center

File No. : 182013 Limit : EN55032 ClassA(3m)

Model Name : Label Printer Temperature : 24℃
Model No. : N36201B Humidity : 56％
S/N : - Operator : H.Shirai
Power Supply : AC230V 50Hz Comment : T-14G
[dB(μV/m)]
90
<EN55032 ClassA(3m) 1-6GHz>
Limit(PK)
80 Limit(AV)
<T-14G>
Level(H,CAV)
70

60

50
Level

40

Y
30

O P
20

C
10

0
1000.000 2000.000 3000.000 4000.000 6000.000
Frequency [MHz]

Final Result

--- Horizontal Polarization (CAV)---

No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Height Angle Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB(1/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB] [cm] [°]
1 1499.300 47.1 -4.3 42.8 56.0 13.2 100.0 54.0

Radiated emission test: USB

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 67 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

OKI Engineering <<RADIATED EMISSION>> 13 August,2018 13:27

EMC Center

File No. : 182013 Limit : EN55032 ClassA(3m)

Model Name : Label Printer Temperature : 24℃
Model No. : N36201B Humidity : 56％
S/N : - Operator : H.Shirai
Power Supply : AC230V 50Hz Comment : T-15G
[dB(μV/m)]
90
<EN55032 ClassA(3m) 1-6GHz>
Limit(PK)
80 Limit(AV)
<T-15G>
Horizontal(PK)
70 Vertical(PK)
Selected Freq(H)
60 Selected Freq(V)

50
Level

40

Y
30

O P
20

C
10

0
1000.000 2000.000 3000.000 4000.000 6000.000
Frequency [MHz]

Spectrum Selection

--- Horizontal Polarization ---

No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
PK PK PK
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB(1/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB]
1 1047.350 50.4 -4.4 46.0 76.0 30.0
2 1499.450 68.4 -4.3 64.1 76.0 11.9
3 1599.550 56.3 -3.6 52.7 76.0 23.3
4 2389.450 55.6 0.7 56.3 76.0 19.7
5 2797.350 52.1 1.1 53.2 76.0 22.8
6 5057.600 47.2 4.7 51.9 80.0 28.1

--- Vertical Polarization ---

No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Remark
PK PK PK
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB(1/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB]
1 1000.000 50.2 -4.0 46.2 76.0 29.8
2 1499.800 54.3 -4.3 50.0 76.0 26.0
3 2391.100 54.2 0.7 54.9 76.0 21.1
4 2999.550 49.4 2.0 51.4 76.0 24.6
5 5943.800 46.2 4.7 50.9 80.0 29.1

Radiated emission test: LAN

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 68 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

OKI Engineering <<RADIATED EMISSION>> 13 August,2018 13:27

EMC Center

File No. : 182013 Limit : EN55032 ClassA(3m)

Model Name : Label Printer Temperature : 24℃
Model No. : N36201B Humidity : 56％
S/N : - Operator : H.Shirai
Power Supply : AC230V 50Hz Comment : T-15G
[dB(μV/m)]
90
<EN55032 ClassA(3m) 1-6GHz>
Limit(PK)
80 Limit(AV)
<T-15G>
Level(H,CAV)
70

60

50
Level

40

Y
30

O P
20

C
10

0
1000.000 2000.000 3000.000 4000.000 6000.000
Frequency [MHz]

Final Result

--- Horizontal Polarization (CAV)---

No. Frequency Reading c.f Result Limit Margin Height Angle Remark
[MHz] [dB(μV)] [dB(1/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB(μV/m)] [dB] [cm] [°]
1 1499.450 49.4 -4.3 45.1 56.0 10.9 100.0 73.0
2 2389.450 32.0 0.7 32.7 56.0 23.3 100.0 73.0

Radiated emission test: LAN

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 69 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 70 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 71 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 72 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 73 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

O P Y
C

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 74 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

APPENDIX3: ANTENNA BEAMWIDTH SPECIFICATIONS

The following data is the Receive-antenna beamwidth specifications for measurements

above 1GHz at distance 3m.

☐Double-Ridged Guide Antenna 3117(ETS-Lindgren)

Measurement Distance Frequency θ3dB(minimum) Beamwidth
d:[m] [GHz] [°] W:[m]
1 88 5.79
2 68 4.05
3 73 4.44
3
4 69 4.12
5 57 3.26

Y
6 52 2.93

C
ＥＵＴ
Ｗ
O Pｄ：3ｍ
θ3ｄＢ
Recevive antenna

Floor

ＯＥＧ
 Test report No. : 182013
Page : 75 of 75
Issued date : 2018/9/25

APPENDIX4: ELECTRIC FIELD STRENGTH CORRECTION

If the distance between the antenna and EUT for the frequency of 1GHz to 6GHz was not 3m, apply
the following formula and correct the electric field intensity value.

Estd = Emeas + 20log(D/3)

Where：
Estd = Field Strength at the standard distance.(dBμV/m)
Emeas = Field Strength at the measurement distance. (dBμV/m)
Dmeas = Mesurement Distance (m)

Y
Assume the following situation :

P
・Mesurement Distance was 3.5m

O
・Field Strength(measurement distance) was 30 dBμV/m.

C
The final field strength would be determined as follows :

Estd = 30 + 20log(3/3)
=30 + 0
=30.0 （dBμV/m）

ＯＥＧ