A PRACTICAL Guide To Training and Development
A PRACTICAL Guide To Training and Development
Guide TO
Training and
Development
Assess, Design, Deliver,
and Evaluate
Michael Moskowitz
Michael Moskowitz
A Practical Guide to Training and Development: Assess, Design, Deliver, and Evaluate. Copyright © 2008
by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Reproduced by permission of Pfeiffer, an Imprint of Wiley. www
.pfeiffer.com
ISBN: 978-0-470-18946-7
Acquiring Editor: Matthew Davis Editor: Rebecca Taff
Director of Development: Kathleen Dolan Davies Editorial Assistant: Lindsay Morton
Marketing Manager: Brian Grimm Manufacturing Supervisor: Becky Morgan
Production Editor: Michael Kay
Printed in the United States of America
Printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
1 In the Beginning 1
Purpose 1
Overview 1
Defining Terms 2
Identifying the Two Essential Training Elements 2
Changing the Perception of Change 3
Understanding Organizational Change Culture:
Force Field Analysis 4
Identifying the Four Stages of Change 6
Role of the Trainer 11
Developing Trainer Competencies 14
No Classroom, No Facilitator, No Change? 19
Career Challenges for the Training Professional 20
Train Effectively or Face the Consequences 20
Common Training Deficiencies 23
Transmissional Not Transformational Learning 26
Effective Training for Minimized Liability 27
W. Edwards Deming 34
Peter Drucker 36
Vision, Mission, and Goal Alignment 38
Training’s Supportive Role 41
Determining Training Priorities 43
The Importance of Organizational Goals 43
Barriers to Achieving Goals 47
3 Needs Assessment 49
Purpose 49
Overview 49
Training Wants Versus Training Needs 50
Needs Assessment Frequency 66
Resistance to the Needs Assessment Process 73
Using Needs Assessment Results 74
4 Training Design 81
Purpose 81
Overview 81
Adult Learning Theory: Malcolm Knowles 82
Trainer Challenges and Strategies for Incorporating
Adult Learning Concepts 84
Program Design Plan 88
References 209
Index 213
About the Author 225
viii
ix
best ways to evaluate and determine the best resource fit for the
organization.
Chapter 7 reviews a four-tier evaluation process for determin-
ing training impact. A fifth tier, return on investment, is discussed
in Chapter 8 as well as technological tools that assist evaluation.
Chapter 9 examines methods to publicize training results to
the organization. The value of a training audit is discussed as a
way to ensure ongoing training success.
In t he B e gin n in g
“We cannot become what we need to be by remaining
what we are.”
Max DePree
Purpose
This chapter will enable you to accomplish the following:
Overview
A successful training and development effort is more than provid-
ing well-received programs for employees—much more. It is built
on a philosophical foundation that supports the organization’s
business strategy. This chapter lays the groundwork for undertak-
ing a comprehensive training and development process. Such a
process examines the organization’s ability to use training to sup-
port its business strategies, goals, vision, and mission, as well as
manage barriers to achieving goals. We’ll start by defining terms,
review the essential elements of training and development, look
at the role of the training professional, and finally examine the
potentially devastating consequences of ineffective training.
Defining Terms
In the professional literature, the terms training and develop-
ment are often differentiated. Training usually refers to the activ-
ities that help employees do their current jobs more effectively.
Development usually refers to the activities that help employees
prepare for the next job opportunity. For instance, a Fundamen-
tals of Supervision program would be considered training for a
group of new or experienced supervisors. It would be considered
a development opportunity for an audience of high-potential
non-supervisory personnel.
Change
Ask people for words that they associate with training and develop-
ment and they will reply with terms such as facilitator, instructor,
classroom learning, simulation, policies and procedures, presenta-
tion, learning modules, results, feedback, orientation, evaluation,
goals, needs assessment, coaching, teaching, interaction, preceptor,
instruction manual, computer-based learning, role playing, and so
on. These words may appear disparate, but they are all pieces of
the processes that people associate with change: learning skills,
acquiring knowledge and abilities, modifying attitudes and behav-
iors, and altering ways of doing business to strengthen job perfor-
mance. Training and development is a euphemism for change,
and change is one of the two essential functions of training.
Goal Focus
The second, equally important function of training relates
to what the training and development effort is attempting to
There are certainly ways to help change happen, and there are
ways to hinder it from happening, but there are no guarantees.
There are, however, definite ways to improve chances for success.
Negative Forces Pushing Downward Lack of Management Direction, Support, and Encouragement
Denial
a. Non-Supervisory Employees. When change was first suggested
to the interview panel employees, their overwhelming reaction
was to deny that a change was necessary. The employees assumed
that the current state, or status quo, was satisfactory, so why
change? It didn’t matter whether the suggested change was attitu-
dinal (“You need to take this more seriously”), behavioral (“The
panel is doing more talking than the candidate”), skill (“Some
of the questions you’re asking are illegal”), process (“The panel
is giving information about the job to the candidate before ask-
ing the candidate for job-related background information”), or
procedural (“The method the panel is using for evaluating can-
didates is flawed”). The overriding feeling was: “We don’t want
to change, and we don’t need to change because things are just
fine the way they are.” The best chance for getting employees
past denial is to help them understand the consequences of not
changing and to reinforce the perception that the consequences
of not changing are more negative than the consequences of
changing. In this case, the negative consequence risked by the
employee hiring panel is recommending customer service rep-
resentatives for hire who were not the best qualified candidates
in the pool. Additionally, asking illegal interview questions opened
the organization to the possibility of a lawsuit.
b. Supervisors and Manager. The supervisors and manager
saw the root cause of the problem differently. They thought
their interviewing skills were fine. They felt the candidates they
selected were willing and able to do the job they were hired to do.
They blamed other factors—noncompetitive wages and benefits,
outdated technology, equipment and facilities, lack of effective
human resource policies and procedures—as the reasons good
hires turned bad. They admitted that some hires only minimally
met requirements, but they justified these hires as a reaction to
pressure from senior management to fill openings as quickly as
possible. And after all, as long as they had been conducting inter-
views they had never been sued for asking illegal questions. So
how bad could their interviewing skills be?
c. Training Professional. Feel the plight of the training pro-
fessional attempting to change the behavior of employees and
experienced supervisors and managers in denial about their inef-
fective interview techniques. Human resources had documented
the history of bad hires that resulted in excessive turnover from
both voluntary and involuntary terminations after short employ-
ment periods; inordinate time had been wasted attempting to
resolve employee relations issues; disability and workers’ com-
pensation claims had risen; poor productivity occurred because
of high absenteeism; and costs had increased from relying on
temporary employment agencies.
In this situation, the best chance the training professional has to
change the interviewing behavior of employees, supervisors, and
the manager is to clearly debunk the myth that the process is
fine as is, so it doesn’t need to change, making a case for behav-
ioral change by presenting data that exposes the exorbitant costs
of excessive turnover in new hires—their rising health claims
Resistance
a. Non-Supervisory Employees. Resistance is different from denial.
The resistant employee says/thinks, “I know I need to change,
but it is difficult to change. I know I need to change my interview-
ing technique, but it is hard to because I have been doing it this
way for years and I am comfortable doing it this way.” Resistance,
though, is one step closer to achieving change, because at least
the employee acknowledges that change, albeit difficult, is neces-
sary. The best way to help an employee past resistance is to clarify
the benefits of the change and to brainstorm (with them) ways to
remove the barriers to trying something new. Sometimes, the best
way for employees to get past resistance is to suffer the unfortu-
nate consequences of not changing. Recommending the hiring of
a co-worker using ineffective interviewing techniques and then
experiencing the difficulties working alongside a “bad hire” might
be the impetus for changing interview practices.
b. Supervisors and Manager. Consider the circumstances of the
customer service supervisors and manager. They are busy deal-
ing with other priorities that significantly impact the Customer
Service Department’s goals—customer satisfaction and retention,
staffing, facilities, and information technology issues. The super-
visors and manager know that they are not attending to the pro-
cess of hiring interviews the best they can but, given their other
pressing issues, something has to take lower priority. Finding
the time to invest in this process right now is challenging. The
supervisors and manager feel they are doing a decent job. If they
weren’t, they wouldn’t have hired and retained any customer ser-
vice representatives. These supervisors and manager are in a state
of resistance about changing their hiring interview behavior and
the process they are following; they know they need to change it,
but it is hard to do.
c. Training Professional. Again, consider the plight of the train-
ing professional attempting to move customer service department
employees, supervisors, and the manager past resistance. Explain
Exploration
a. Non-Supervisory Employees. After denial and resistance are over-
come, exploration is the next step in the change process. The
exploring customer service employee says/thinks, “I’ll try this
change and see how it feels. I’ll try doing interviews this new and
different way and see how it goes.” The best way to help employ-
ees embrace exploration is to identify the positive outcomes
and benefits of the new behavior. In training jargon, the term is
WIIFM (What’s in it for me?). WIIFM implies that employees will
be more likely to try something new if they clearly envision how
the change will benefit them personally. In this case study, a bet-
ter hiring interview will lead to recommending better customer
service representative candidates, which will lead to better hires
which will lead to more effective and compatible co-workers.
b. Supervisors and Manager. Consider the circumstances of
the customer service supervisors and manager who are willing
to explore change. They approach an organizational change
initiative with curiosity. They are interested in attempting to
implement new interview behaviors and processes for incoming
customer service representative candidates. Additionally, their
employees will be more likely to understand and accept the ratio-
nale behind the request for new behaviors and processes if they
see their supervisors and manager doing the same. A powerful
message resonates throughout the department when supervi-
sors and manager experience the process and benefits of change
together with the other employees.
c. Training Professional. The training professional is in an
advantageous position with an audience that is exploring change.