Scribd
Upload
3K views7 pages

Application For Revision

1. The petitioner is seeking revision of the lower court's order dismissing a criminal complaint. 2. The grounds for revision include that the lower court erred in finding no criminal offense was disclosed, that it was a civil matter, and that the complaint and sworn statements established offenses of criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy. 3. The petitioner requests the higher court to order further inquiry in the criminal case.

Uploaded by

Nimisha Rathore
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3K views7 pages

Application For Revision

1. The petitioner is seeking revision of the lower court's order dismissing a criminal complaint. 2. The grounds for revision include that the lower court erred in finding no criminal offense was disclosed, that it was a civil matter, and that the complaint and sworn statements established offenses of criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy. 3. The petitioner requests the higher court to order further inquiry in the criminal case.

Uploaded by

Nimisha Rathore
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

APPLICATION FOR REVISION 

IN THE COURT OF THE SESSIONS JUDGE, ----------

Revision Petition No......of 200

ABC, son of........., aged about........ 

years, occupation.......resident of....... .....Petitioner 


versus

PQR, son of......., aged about...... 

years, occupation.....resident ......Respondent 

of..... ....... ...... 

May It Please Your Honour, 

The humble petition of the petitioner above named most respectfully


sheweth: 

At first in a few paragraphs briefly describe the case and the decision
thereof and then write the following para before giving grounds. 

The petitioner begs to prefer this petition against the order of the Judicial
Magistrate of the First class, Coimbatore, passed in Cr. Case No.......of
200......dated 25th April, 200.....on the following among other grounds: 
Grounds

1. The order of the lower Court is against law. 


2. The lower Court has erred in stating that no criminal offence is disclosed.
The lower court has erred in stating that it is a matter for the civil court to
decide. 

3. The lower Court ought to have found that from the complaint and the
sworn statement the offence under Sections 403,420 and 384, read with
Sec. 109 of the I.P.C. against the accused have been made out for
enquiry. 

4. The lower court ought not have dismissed the complaint under Section
203 of the Cr. P.C. simply because the accused 1 and 2 happen to be the
relations of the complainant. 

5. In any event criminal offence under Section 403, I.P.C. at least is clearly
made out both from the complaint and sworn statements. 

It is, therefore, prayed that the Hon'ble Court be Pleased to order further
inquiry in the above case. 

Dated : 

Plaintiff / Defendant 

Through, Advocate 
Verification:

I, ______, do hereby verify that the contents from paras 1 to ______ are
correct and true to the best of my knowledge and personal belief and no
part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therein. 

Affirmed at ----this ______. 

Plaintiff / Defendant 
IN THE COURT OF THE SESSIONS JUDGE AT -----------
Revision Appn. No......of 200

A, etc. of......., at present in 

Jail custody at -----Petitioner (Accused) 


versus

State........ .........Respondent 

In the matter of a Revision from the order of conviction and sentence


passed under section 324, I.P.C. on (put date here) by the learned Judicial
Magistrate on the first class, Coimbatore. 

Most respectfully May it Please Your Honour. 

The humble petition of the above-named petitioner Most respectfully


Sheweth: 

1. That the learned Judicial Magistrate in case No.... of 200....convicted the


applicant and one B under the above section and sentenced them for a
period of four months R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. 100 in default to undergo
further R.I. for 15 days. 

Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order the petitioner begs to move the
Hon'ble Court in its Revisional Jurisdiction of the following among other
grounds: 
Grounds

(a) That the order of the lower Court is against law. 


(b) That the learned Magistrate erred in believing the P.W. Nos. 1 and 3
who are relations and/are friends of the complainants, and as such were
interested witnesses. 
(c) That the learned Magistrate was wrong in disbelieving the two
respectable and independent witnesses examined on behalf of the
defence. 
(d) That the learned Magistrate has erred in not complying with the
mandatory provisions of Section 313 of the Cr. P.C. whereby an
opportunity to explain away the circumstances appearing against them was
refused. 
(e) That the learned Magistrate has not maintained a full record of the evi-
dence and hence certain admissions by the prosecution witnesses given in
their cross-examinations are not available. 

2. The petitioner prays that Your Honour may be graciously pleased to call
for the record of the case and issue a rule upon the said Magistrate, and
upon the opposite party to show cause why the aforesaid order complained
against should not be vacated, and to release the petitioner on bail pending
the disposal of this revision application. 

And for this act of kindness your petitioner, as in duty bound, shall ever
pray. 

Dated : 

Plaintiff / Defendant 

Through, Advocate 
Verification:

I, ______, do hereby verify that the contents from paras 1 to ______ are
correct and true to the best of my knowledge and personal belief and no
part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therein. 

Affirmed at -------- this ______. 


Plaintiff / Defendant 
IN THE ----------- HIGH COURT

Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction

Criminal Application No.........of 200......

In the matter of the order of the Session Judge, ----------------------------,


sentencing the opponent to one month's R.I, and a fine of rs. 200 in case
No. 99/P of 200...... 

State of --------- at the instance 

of the District Superintendent of Police,........Petitioner 


versus

Ashok Singh, aged 28 years, 

Residing at Coimbatore ......Opponent 

The humble petition of Your Lordship's petitioner above-named. Most


Respectfully Sheweth: 

1. The above-named opponent was arrested in Coimbatore on a charge


under sections 307 and 326, i.P.C. for an attempt to murder and causing
grievous hurt by dangerous weapon. He was prosecuted and tried in the
Court of the Session in case No. 99/P of 200......of that Court and the
learned Sessions Judge was pleased to convict the accused and sentence
him to one month's rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.200 
2. While passing the final order of sentence after convicting the opponent,
the learned Judge remarked that he was pleased to take a lenient view of
the offence taking into consideration the youth of the opponent. 

3. The learned Judge therefore passed a lenient sentence of one month's


R.I. and a fine of Rs. 200 on the opponent though the maximum sentence
under Sections 307 and 326,1.P.C. is imprisonment for life, or for 10 years.
Though the prosecution prayed for deterrent punishment on the ground that
the injuries caused were of a very serious nature and that the injuries were
caused by a dangerous weapon during a communal riot. The learned
Judge turned down the prayer of the prosecution for a deterrent
punishment and showed leniency to the opponent by passing the order of
sentence as stated above. Hereto annexed and marked annexure ‘A' is th
copy of the said order and judgment. 

4. Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner prefers this application
for enhancement of sentence passed on the opponent by the learned
Judge on the following amongst other grounds: 

(a) That the injuries caused by the opponent (accused) were several and of
a very serious nature; 
(b) That the injuries were caused by a dangerous weapon, i.e., a dagger
which was possessed and carried by the accused when the possession
and carrying of weapons was banned by the order of the District
Magistrate, -----------------------; 
(c) That the opponent (accused) is a member of a gang of rioters habitually
engaged in communal orgy and riots and has made an attempt to murder
by causing grievous hurt to the complainant intentionally in the furtherance
and prosecution of the common object of a riotous mob. 
(d) That the punishment for the offences is life or ten year's imprisonment
and fine. 

5. In these circumstances Your Lordships' humble petitioner prays that


Your Lordships may graciously be pleased: 

(1) to enhance the sentence passed on the opponent by the learned


sessions Judge in case No. 99/P of 200......of his Court; and 
(2) to pass such other and further orders as Your Lordships may deem just,
fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 

And for this act of kindness Your Lordships' Petitioner shall, as in duty
bound, ever pray. 
------------- P 

This.......th day of April, 2008..... Government Pleader. 

I, (full name) Deputy Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore, do hereby


solemnly declare that what is stated above is true to the best of my
knowledge, belief and information. 

Sd/- 

Dy. Superintendent of Police ,----------- 

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy