Notes On Separation Pay
Notes On Separation Pay
Separation Pay
An employee may be entitled to receive separation pay depending on the nature of his
or her dismissal from employment. It is imperative to note that this, being merely a guideline,
may not be sufficient to cover specific cases of which the Supreme Court has ruled in a certain
ratio.
Under the same Department Order, the minimum Separation Pay that should be
received by the Employee depends on the cause invoked for his termination.
If the termination is due to Retrenchment, then the Separation Pay must be at least 1
month’s salary, OR ½ of 1 month’s salary for every year of service, whichever is higher.
If the termination is due to Disease, then Separation Pay must be at least 1 month’s
salary, OR ½ of 1 month’s salary for every year of service, whichever is higher.
In all these instances, any length of service which is at least 6 months but less than a full
year shall still be considered a full year for the purposes of computing the Separation Pay.
For employees on a probationary status, if their dismissal is based on the fact that they
failed to meet the standards disclosed to them and are expected of them to meet, they are not
entitled to separation pay.
Under the Labor Code, an employee’s termination is the test of whether or not such an
individual is entitled to receive it. In Philippine law, the Labor Code makes a distinction between
what is called a “Just Cause” and “Authorized Cause”
Just Causes are those causes recognized by law as grounds to terminate an employee
from employment because of the fault of the employee. They are not entitled to receive
separation pay. The law specifically outlines Just Causes under Article 297 of the Labor Code
to be the following grounds:
1. Serious misconduct or willful disobedience by the employee of the lawful orders of
his employer or representative in connection with his work;
2. Willful disobedience or Insubordination
3. Gross and habitual neglect by the employee of his duties;
4. Fraud or willful breach by the employee of the trust reposed in him by his employer
or duly authorized representative;
5. Commission of a crime or offense by the employee against the person of his
employer or any immediate member of his family or his duly authorized
representative; and
6. Other Analogous cases.
Under DOLE Department Order 147-15, the elements required for such termination to be
valid varies depending on the cause of termination: