Brother in Land Notes
Brother in Land Notes
cataclysm by some unusual twist of fate. However, this novel dares to break the pattern – teenage
boy Danny Lodge, around whom this story is centred, is forced to live in the direct aftermath of a
nuclear war, with a band of fellow survivors from his town, right in the middle of the devastation
… and the radiation.
The book packs plenty of punches. We read about the loss of loved ones, ever-increasing hunger,
radiation sickness leading to death, man’s inhumanity to man in the fight to survive, and worst of
all, fears about mutation – whether mankind will be able to give birth to normal human beings
again.
On the brighter side, there’s a love story that runs through the book. Also, an interesting sub-plot
involving a second surviving community, one dressed in anti-radiation suits and carrying guns.
Swindell succeeds in painting a very gloomy picture, and I found myself wondering how this
book was going to come up with an ending that would make the telling of the story worthwhile.
It does manage to, but only just. Make no mistake, this is bleak stuff, almost disturbing stuff, and
I don’t think I’ll ever read it twice. However, I am glad I read it once, and Swindells is to be
admired for daring to write something of such depth for a teenage audience.
In this essay I will to show how wretchedness and greed override all
principles taught to a person in the novel "Brother in the land"
written by Robert Swindells.
This will be done by, first, analysing the word wretchedness and then
looking at certain sections of the novel.
Most wretchedness came from the people at Kershaw Farm but also a lot
came from Rhodes, Danny's P.E teacher; this is part of the mutation
humanity suffered. The discrimination was now towards the sick instead
of the poor. Rhodes himself thinks that it is a waste effort, time and
supplies to keep receiving the sick and wounded at Brandwell's house
(MASADA Headquarters). "Don't dole it out to all and sundry! (the
water) Save it for us, we need to keep our strength up." And continues
later on (Danny speaking) "A lot of defectors (people who escaped from
Kershaw Farm) were sick, and Rhodes and some others thought we
shouldn't take them. They were a drain to our resources and
contributed nothing to our cause."
There were still people, apart from Danny, who were still sane enough
to do the right thing; such as Brandwell, who gave shelter and food to
anyone who came in need of them. He knew that the second they turned
people down when they came; they would be just like the soldiers up at
Kershaw Farm. Even Danny's father was a bit greedy. He did not want to
give food to the needed, he just gave a small amount the first day and
that was it. Another sane person was Booth. He knew the difference
between good and bad thus letting Danny live instead of shooting him,
as the commissioner had ordered.
It is typical of nuclear texts for young adults that the reason for the disaster is given in
metaphysical rather than political terms. The wise guide figure in Brother in the Land,
Branwell, says to Danny:
We watched death and destruction on T.V. newsreels till it meant nothing
to us – till it didn't shock us any more. If we'd realized in time what was
happening to us, if we'd clung on to our reverence for life, then we'd
never have launched those missiles.
(Swindells 2000, 76)
The responsibility of the young adult in preventing the disaster which has been set up
by the adult generation is particularly obvious in the Afterword to the 1986 edition of
Brother in the Land, partially quoted in the title of this paper:
There is no hope in my story because it is about a time after the bombs
have fallen. The hope – the one hope – is that your generation will prove
wiser and more responsible than mine, and that the bombs will not fall.
Soon our lovely, fragile world will pass into your hands. Safe hands, I
believe.
(Swindells 1986, 153)