MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: ___Cassandra Faye M. Punzalan_____________________ Name of Rater: _Vicky C. Alday_________________________

Position: __Teacher I_________________ Position: _______________Master Teacher I________________
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: ____Division of Batangas____________________ Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Knowledge knowledge of Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and content within and or Inter-observer
Services Pedagogy across curriculum agreement forms done
teaching areas. through on-site/ face-to-
Efficiency
face/ in-person classroom
observation
Timeliness
2. Used a range of 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
teaching strategies Tool (COT) rating sheets
that enhance or Inter-observer
learner agreement forms done
through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
achievement in
literacy and face/ in-person classroom
numeracy skills. observation
Timeliness
3. Applied a range 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
of teaching Tool (COT) rating sheets
strategies to or Inter-observer
develop critical agreement forms done
and creative through on-site/ face-to-
face/ in-person classroom Efficiency
thinking, as well as
other higher-order observation
thinking skills.

Timeliness
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating
Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Ratin
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results
g
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Environment classroom structure Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and Diversity to engage learners, or Inter-observer
Services of Learners individually or in agreement forms done
groups, in through on-site/ face-to-
meaningful face/ in-person classroom
exploration, Efficiency
observation
discovery and
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
Timeliness
5. Managed learner 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
behavior Tool (COT) rating sheets
constructively by or Inter-observer
applying positive agreement forms done
and non-violent through on-site/ face-to-
discipline to ensure face/ in-person classroom Efficiency
learning-focused observation
environments.

Timeliness
6. Used 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
differentiated, Tool (COT) rating sheets
developmentally or Inter-observer
appropriate agreement forms done
learning through on-site/ face-to-
experiences to face/ in-person classroom
address learners’ observation Efficiency
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences.
 Timeliness

Weight Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Ratin
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results
g
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio and Planning managed and Tool (COT) rating sheets
n implemented or Inter-observer
Services developmentally agreement forms done
sequenced through on-site/ face-to-
teaching and face/ in-person classroom
learning processes Efficiency
observation
to meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts.
Timeliness
8. Participated in 7% 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality 3
collegial LAC sessions/ FGDs/
discussions that meetings/ other collegial
use teacher and discussions
learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC
enrich teaching sessions/ FGDs/
practice. meetings/ other collegial
discussions on use of
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of Efficiency
teachers on their 4
demonstration of teaching Timeliness
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions/ FGDs/
meetings/ other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with
proofs of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
 form/document that
highlights the objective

Weight Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Ratin
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results
g
9. Selected, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
developed, Tool (COT) rating sheets
organized and used or Inter-observer
appropriate agreement forms done
teaching and Efficiency
through on-site/ face-to-
learning resources, face/ in-person classroom
including ICT, to
observation
address learning
goals. Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Assessment selected, organized Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and and used or Inter-observer
Services Reporting diagnostic, agreement forms done
formative and through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
summative face/ in-person classroom
assessment observation
strategies
consistent with Timeliness
curriculum
requirements.
11. Monitored and 7% Any one (1) of the Quality 4
evaluated learner following:
progress and
▪ Individual
achievement using
learner attainment Learning
data. Monitoring Plan
stakeholders, (ILMP)
including
parents/guardians ▪ Peer assessment
data
▪ Sample of
learners’ outputs
with reflection/
 self-assessment
Efficiency
▪ Progress charts/
anecdotal records
▪ Class/ e-class
record/ grading
sheets

Weight Means of Mid-year Mid-year Review Results

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Verification Review
Rating
Ratee Rater
(Teacher) (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Timeliness 4
▪ Less
on
plan
s
sho
wing
inde
x of
mas
tery
▪ Freq
uen
cy of
error
s
▪ Any
equi
vale
nt
ALS
form
/
doc
ume
 nt Performanc
that e Target
highl
ights
the
obje
ctive
(e.g.
Indiv
idual
Lear
ning
Agre
eme
nt
(ILA
),
ALS
Ass
ess
men
t
For
m 2)
▪ Oth
ers
(ple
ase
spec
ify
and
prov
ide
ann
otati
on)
Basic 5. Personal 12. 7% Any one (1) Quality 3
Education Growth and Communicat of the
Services Profession ed promptly following:
al and clearly
Developme the learners’
▪ A
nt needs,
progress sam
and ple
achievement of
to key corr
stakeholders ecte
, including d
parents/guar test
dians pap
er of
a
lear
ner
in a
lear
ning
area
with
pare
nt’s
or
guar
dian’
s
sign
atur
e
and
date
of
rece
ipt
▪ Min
utes
of
mee
tings
with
key
 stak
ehol
ders
(e.g.
PTA
,
SG
C,
SPT
,
CPC
)
with
proo
f of
atte
nda
nce
▪ Rep
ort
card
with
pare
nt’s
or
guar
dian’
s
sign
atur
e in
all
quar
ters
sup
port
ed

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of

per KRA Verification Mid-year Mid-year Review Results
 Review
Rating
Ratee Rater
Performanc (Teacher) (Principal)
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
by Efficiency
min 3
utes Timeliness
13. Applied 7% A of Quality 3
a personal reflection/
mee
philosophy journal ting
of teaching entry that
▪ Com
that is highlights
learner- the mun
centered. icati
application
of a on Efficiency
learner-with 3
centered key
Timeliness
stak
teaching
ehol
philosophy
ders
in the
(e.g.
lesson plan
pare
or
nts/
community
guar
work.
dian
 Weight
Mid-year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Mid-year
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
14. Set 7% 1. Certification from the Quality 4
professional ICT Coordinator/ School
development Head/ Focal Person in
goals based charge of
Efficiency 4
on the e-SAT
Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Midyear Review Form
Standards for (MRF) Timeliness 4
Teachers 4. Updated IPCRF-DP
Phase II

Basic Plus Factor 15. 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality 4
Education Performed
Services various ● Committee
related works/ involvement
activities that
contribute to ● Involvement as
the teaching- module/ learning
learning material writer/
process. validator
● Involvement as a
resource person/
speaker/ learning
Efficiency 4
facilitator in the
RO/ SDO/ school-
initiated TV/Radio-
based instruction
● Book or journal
authorship/ co-
authorship/
contributorship
● Advisorship/
coordinatorship/
 Weight
Mid-year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Mid-year
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
14. Set 7% 1. Certification from the Quality 4
professional ICT Coordinator/ School
development Head/ Focal Person in
goals based charge of
Efficiency 4
on the e-SAT
Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Midyear Review Form
Standards for (MRF) Timeliness 4
Teachers 4. Updated IPCRF-DP
chairpersonship
● Participation in
demonstration
teaching

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Mid-year
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
● Participation as
Timeliness
research presenter
in a forum/
conference
● Mentoring of pre-
service/ in-service
teachers
● Conducted
research within the
rating period

with annotation on how it

contributed to the
teaching-learning process.
VICKY C. ALDAY CASSANDRA FAYE M. PUNZALAN

Rater Ratee Approving Authority