Sample Thesis (Master)
Sample Thesis (Master)
2019 – 2021
SUBMITTED BY
ARCHIBALD S. GERGEH
B.Sc (MANAGEMENT)
ID#: 20297
JANUARY, 2023
DECLARATION BY RESEARCHER
I, Archibald S. Gergeh declare that this Master’s Thesis Proposal, An Evaluation of the Economic
work and has not been submitted for the award of a degree in any other University or College.
Archibald S. Gergeh
DECLARATION BY ADVISOR
This Master’s Thesis Proposal, An Evaluation of the Economic Impact of the National Pension
Scheme on NASSCORP’S Retirees of (2019-2021) was done under my supervision and has not
been submitted to the Cuttington University School of Graduate and Professional Studies for
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In writing this research, I have become aware of the many ways in which my ideas about thesis
writing have been influenced by some resourceful persons. I cannot possibly thank them all
individually for their many contributions, however, a number of them deserve special mention. In
this regards, I am most grateful to God Almighty whose bountiful blessings and favor afforded me
the opportunity to enroll in the graduate program of the Cuttington University School of Graduate
and Professional Studies. Also, I am thankful to NASSCORP’s Management for the scholarship
granted for to further my studies. I am beholden to my parents, Mr. and Mrs. Julies N. Gergeh. Mr.
Winston Q. Jah, Mr. Joel Oscar Dickerson, Mrs. Isatu Ville Cheeks, Ms. Miata E. Beysolow, and
Ms. Myrtle J. Johnson for their moral and financial support to me during this tedious exercise. I am
particularly grateful to S. Dahnne Daniels (Rev.) for his mentorship and tutelage which
work.
My sincere appreciation goes to my beloved family for their prayers, love, and endless support
through this academic journey as well as my research work. Words cannot express all the
Last but not least, I acknowledge my instructor and mentor, Dr. Solomon Jarpah, for your
commitment and the knowledge you imparted. I thank you very kindly, Dr. Jarpah.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Declaration by Researcher I
Declaration by Advisor II
Acknowledgement III
4.2 Findings
5.1 Summary
5.2 Conclusion
5.3 Recommendation
Bibliography
A total of forty-four questionnaires were distributed among respondents of this study. All of the
forty-four (44) questionnaires were fully answered and returned. Below are tables and charts
Male 25 56.88
Female 19 43.12
Total 44 100
Table 1 shows the gender of the respondents, 25 out of the total of 44 respondents of constituting
56.88% of the respondents are male, while 19 out of the total of 44 respondents representing
Male
43.12% Female
56.88%
Male Female
40 - 49 1 1 2 4.54
50 - 59 2 2 4 9.1
60 – above 22 16 38 86.36
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 2 shows the age range of respondents, 2 out of the total of 44 respondents representing
4.54% are between age range 40-49; while 4 out of the 44 respondents constituting 9.1% is
between age range 50-59; and 38 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 86.36% are between
Age Range
4.54
9.1%
40-49
50-59
60-above
86.36%
Male Female
Married 11 11 22 50
Single 4 3 7 15.9
Divorce 10 5 15 34.1
Total 25 19 44 100
50% are married; while 7 out of the 44 respondents constituting 15.9% are single; and 15 out of
Marital Status
34.1%
Married
Single
50% Divorce
15.9%
Male Female
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 4 shows the marital status of respondents, 11 out of the total of 44 respondents representing
25% are high school graduates; while 16 out of the 44 respondents constituting 36.6% hold
Bachelor degree; and 11 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 25% hold Associate degree as
13.6
25
High School graduate
Associate degree
Bachelor degree
Master degree
36.4
25
1-5 years 0 0 0 0
6-10 years 6 5 11 25
11 -15 years 8 3 11 25
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 5 shows the working experience of respondents, 11 out of the total of 44 respondents
representing 25% have working experience of 6-10 years; while another 11 out of the 44
respondents constituting 25% have working experience of 11 -15 years; and 22 out of the total of
25
Six - Ten
50 Eleven - Fifteen
Sixteen and above
25
Table 6: Responses concerning the economic impact of pension income on the livelihood of
retirees:
Agree 5 5 10 22.7
Disagree 9 6 15 34.1
Strongly Disagree 6 5 11 25
Total 25 19 44 100
livelihood of retirees, 8 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting 18.2% of the respondents
strongly agreed; while 10 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 22.7% of the respondents
agreed, whereas 15 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting 34.1% of the respondents
disagree, and 11 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 25% of the respondents strongly
disagree.
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
22.7
Strongly disagree
34.1
Agree 6 4 10 22.7
Disagree 12 10 22 50
Strongly Disagree 5 3 8 18.2
Total 25 19 44 100
to the payment of medical care, 4 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting 9.1% of the
respondents strongly agreed; while 10 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 22.7% of the
respondents agreed, whereas 22 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting 50% of the
respondents disagree, and 8 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 18.2% of the respondents
strongly disagree.
18.2 9.1
22.7
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
50
Agree 6 4 10 22.7
Disagree 14 9 23 52.3
Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 8 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income from pension
contribute to the payment of recreation, 11 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting 25% of
the respondents strongly agreed; while 10 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 22.7% of
the respondents agreed, and 23 out of the total of 44 respondents or 52.3% of the respondents
disagree.
22.7%
Agree 6 4 10 22.7
Disagree 10 9 19 43.3
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 9 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income received from
pension contributes to the payment for child/children education, 7 out of the total of 44
respondents constituting 15.9% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 10 out of the total of 44
respondents representing 22.7% of the respondents agreed, whereas 19 out of the total of 44
respondents or 43.3% of the respondents disagree, and 8 out of total of 44 respondents which is
Strongly Agree
Agree
22.7%
Disagree
Strongly disagree
43.3%
Table 10 Responses concerning the income from pension affords retiree to start up a petty
business:
Agree 8 3 11 25
Disagree 10 6 16 36.4
Total 25 19 44 100
contribute to the purchasing of needed wearing, 7 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 15.9%
of the respondents strongly agreed; while 11 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 25% of
the respondents agreed, 16 out of the total of 44 respondents or 36.4% of the respondents disagree,
and 10 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 22.7% of the respondents strongly disagree.
Strongly Agree
Agree
25% Disagree
Strongly Agree
36.4%
Strongly Agree 6 5 11 25
Agree 8 7 15 34.1
Disagree 11 7 18 40.9
Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 11 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income from pension
afford a minimum living standard, 11 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 25% of the
respondents strongly agreed; while 15 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 34.1% of the
respondents agreed, and 18 out of the total of 44 respondents or 40.9% of the respondents disagree.
40.9%
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
34.1%
Strongly Agree 6 5 11 25
Agree 11 7 18 40.9
Disagree 8 7 15 34.1
Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 12 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income from pension
contributes to the payment for house rent, 11 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 25% of the
respondents strongly agreed; while 18 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 40.9% of the
respondents agreed, and 15 out of the total of 44 respondents or 34.1% of the respondents disagree.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
40.9%
Agree 4 3 7 15.9
Disagree 13 9 22 50
Strongly Disagree 6 5 11 25
Total 25 12 44 100
Table 13 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income from pension
afford travel expenses, 4 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 9.1% of the respondents
strongly agreed; while 7 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 15.9% of the respondents
agreed, 22 out of the total of 44 respondents or 50% of the respondents disagree, and 11 out of the
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Agree
50%
Agree 8 3 11 25
Disagree 10 6 16 36.4
Total 25 19 44 100
contribute to the purchasing of needed wearing, 7 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 15.9%
of the respondents strongly agreed; while 11 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 25% of
the respondents agreed, 16 out of the total of 44 respondents or 36.4% of the respondents disagree,
and 10 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 22.7% of the respondents strongly disagree.
Strongly Agree
Agree
25% Disagree
Strongly Agree
36.4%
Agree 12 10 22 50
Disagree 6 4 10 22.7
Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 15 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income from pension is
helping in the purchasing of edible provision (food, groceries, etc..), 12 out of the total of 44
respondents which is 27.3% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 22 out of the total of 44
respondents representing 50% of the respondents agreed, and 10 out of the total of 44 respondents
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
50%
Strongly Agree
Agree 12 10 22 50
Disagree 6 4 10 22.7
Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 16 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about NASSCORP retirees’ pension
benefits can be improved by increasing employees’ salaries; 12 out of the total of 44 respondents
which is 27.3% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 22 out of the total of 44 respondents
representing 50% of the respondents agreed, and 10 out of the total of 44 respondents or 22.7% of
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
50%
Source: Researcher’s field Data, 2023
Table 17: Responses concerning retirees’ of NASSCORP benefits can be improved by increasing
retirement benefits for employees:
Strongly Agree 12 10 22 50
Agree 8 3 11 25
Disagree 5 6 11 25
Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 17 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about retirees’ of NASSCORP
benefits can be improved by increasing retirement benefit for employees; 22 out of the total of 44
respondents which is 50% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 11 out of the total of 44
respondents representing 25% of the respondents agreed, and another 11 out of the total of 44
50
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
25
Agree 7 4 11 25
Disagree 6 4 10 22.7
Strongly Disagree 5 6 11 25
Total 25 19 44 100
benefits can be improved by employees’ paying a lump sum into their pension; 12 out of the total
of 44 respondents which is 27.3% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 11 out of the total of
44 respondents representing 25% of the respondents agreed, and 10 out of the total of 44
respondents or 22.7% of the respondents disagree, whereas 11 out of the total of 44 respondents
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
50%
Agree 12 10 22 50
Disagree 6 4 10 22.7
Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 19 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about NASSCORP retirees’ pension
benefits can be boost by increasing employees vesting period, 12 out of the total of 44 respondents
which is 27.3% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 22 out of the total of 44 respondents
representing 50% of the respondents agreed, and 10 out of the total of 44 respondents or 22.7% of
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
50%
Agree 7 4 11 25
Disagree 9 12 22 50
Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 0
Total 25 19 44 100
Table 20 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about NASSCORP retirees’ pension
benefits can be improved by increasing employees’ contribution rate, 11 out of the total of 44
respondents which is 25% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 11 out of the total of 44
respondents representing 25% of the respondents agreed, and 22 out of the total of 44 respondents
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
50%
Source: Researcher’s field Data, 2023
4.2 Findings
After carefully cleaning and analyzing the data collected from the respondents in this study, the
researcher therefore presents the findings gathered from this study below:
Table 1 shows the gender of the respondents, 25 out of the total of 44 respondents of constituting
56.88% of the respondents are male, while 19 out of the total of 44 respondents representing
Table 2 shows the age range of respondents, 2 out of the total of 44 respondents representing
4.54% are between age range 40-49; while 4 out of the 44 respondents constituting 9.1% is
between age range 50-59; and 38 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 86.36% are between
Table 3 shows the marital status of respondents, 22 out of the total of 44 respondents representing
50% are married; while 7 out of the 44 respondents constituting 15.9% are single; and 15 out of
Table 4 shows the marital status of respondents, 11 out of the total of 44 respondents representing
25% are high school graduates; while 16 out of the 44 respondents constituting 36.6% hold
Bachelor degree; and 11 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 25% hold Associate degree as
Table 5 shows the working experience of respondents, 11 out of the total of 44 respondents
representing 25% have working experience of 6-10 years; while another 11 out of the 44
respondents constituting 25% have working experience of 11 -15 years; and 22 out of the total of
Table 6 shows the responses of respondents when asked about the economic impact of pension
income on the livelihood of retirees, 8 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting 18.2% of the
respondents strongly agreed; while 10 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 22.7% of the
respondents agreed, whereas 15 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting 34.1% of the
respondents disagree, and 11 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 25% of the respondents
strongly disagree.
Table 7 shows the responses of respondents when asked about the income from pension contribute
to the payment of medical care, 4 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting 9.1% of the
respondents strongly agreed; while 10 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 22.7% of the
respondents agreed, whereas 22 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting 50% of the
respondents disagree, and 8 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 18.2% of the respondents
strongly disagree.
Table 8 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income from pension
contribute to the payment of recreation, 11 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting 25% of
the respondents strongly agreed; while 10 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 22.7% of
the respondents agreed, and 23 out of the total of 44 respondents or 52.3% of the respondents
disagree.
Table 9 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income received from
pension contributes to the payment for child/children education, 7 out of the total of 44
respondents constituting 15.9% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 10 out of the total of 44
respondents representing 22.7% of the respondents agreed, whereas 19 out of the total of 44
respondents or 43.3% of the respondents disagree, and 8 out of total of 44 respondents which is
Table 10 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income from pension
contribute to the purchasing of needed wearing, 7 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 15.9%
of the respondents strongly agreed; while 11 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 25% of
the respondents agreed, 16 out of the total of 44 respondents or 36.4% of the respondents disagree,
and 10 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 22.7% of the respondents strongly disagree.
Table 11 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income from pension
afford a minimum living standard, 11 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 25% of the
respondents strongly agreed; while 15 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 34.1% of the
respondents agreed, and 18 out of the total of 44 respondents or 40.9% of the respondents disagree.
Table 12 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income from pension
contributes to the payment for house rent, 11 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 25% of the
respondents strongly agreed; while 18 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 40.9% of the
respondents agreed, and 15 out of the total of 44 respondents or 34.1% of the respondents disagree.
Table 13 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income from pension
afford travel expenses, 4 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 9.1% of the respondents
strongly agreed; while 7 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 15.9% of the respondents
agreed, 22 out of the total of 44 respondents or 50% of the respondents disagree, and 11 out of the
contribute to the purchasing of needed wearing, 7 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 15.9%
of the respondents strongly agreed; while 11 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 25% of
the respondents agreed, 16 out of the total of 44 respondents or 36.4% of the respondents disagree,
and 10 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 22.7% of the respondents strongly disagree.
Table 15 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about the income from pension is
helping in the purchasing of edible provision (food, groceries, etc..), 12 out of the total of 44
respondents which is 27.3% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 22 out of the total of 44
respondents representing 50% of the respondents agreed, and 10 out of the total of 44 respondents
Table 16 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about NASSCORP retirees’ pension
benefits can be improved by increasing employees’ salaries; 12 out of the total of 44 respondents
which is 27.3% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 22 out of the total of 44 respondents
representing 50% of the respondents agreed, and 10 out of the total of 44 respondents or 22.7% of
Table 17 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about retirees’ of NASSCORP
benefits can be improved by increasing retirement benefit for employees; 22 out of the total of 44
respondents which is 50% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 11 out of the total of 44
respondents representing 25% of the respondents agreed, and another 11 out of the total of 44
Table 18 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about NASSCORP retirees pension
benefits can be improved by employees’ paying a lump sum into their pension; 12 out of the total
of 44 respondents which is 27.3% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 11 out of the total of
44 respondents representing 25% of the respondents agreed, and 10 out of the total of 44
respondents or 22.7% of the respondents disagree, whereas 11 out of the total of 44 respondents
Table 19 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about NASSCORP retirees’ pension
benefits can be boost by increasing employees vesting period, 12 out of the total of 44 respondents
which is 27.3% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 22 out of the total of 44 respondents
representing 50% of the respondents agreed, and 10 out of the total of 44 respondents or 22.7% of
Table 20 shows the responses of the respondents when asked about NASSCORP retirees’ pension
benefits can be improved by increasing employees’ contribution rate, 11 out of the total of 44
respondents which is 25% of the respondents strongly agreed; while 11 out of the total of 44
respondents representing 25% of the respondents agreed, and 22 out of the total of 44 respondents
This chapter presents the discussion of key findings from the research. The discussion analysis
how the findings of the study agreed or disagreed with other findings from the literature presented
in chapter two, as well as presents an overall reflection about the findings. The discussion of the
study was done in line with the research objective to gain insight on the economic impact of the
National Pension Scheme on retirees of NASSCORP. It also discusses institutional structures and
processes in place to help retirees maintain a minimum living standard after retirement. Retirees
largely depend on pension income for their livelihood, at the same time, they are exposed and
vulnerable to the effects of pension benefits which affects their pension income and livelihood
((ILO, 2010). Data collected in this research confirms that most retirees strongly depend on
pension income for their livelihood after retirement. This finding corresponds with the literature
(Aaron Z. Paye, 2021) that states that having a substantial amount of money set aside for your
retirement years can assure you of a comfortable life down the road; and it allows you to be
financially independent, not having to rely on children, grandchildren, or relatives to sustain you
when you are no longer working. According to retirees interviewed in this research, the income
received from pension does not covered most of their living expensive to include, medical, travel,
child or children education fee, etc. this finding agree with (“Social Security in African context”,
p.23) which concluded that pension is a percentage of employee’s gross aggregate earnings. It is
not intended to enrich pensioners/recipients, but to assist them “maintain a minimum living
standard” after retirement. Thus, on the basis of the data gathered, the interpretations of the results
from the reviewed findings, the researcher revealed the following: in response to the first research
question, To what degree, economically speaking, does the National Pension Scheme impact
NASSCORP’s retirees, the study shows that 18 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting
40.91% of the respondents agreed that the national pension program is economically impacting
their livelihood; while 26 out of the total of 44 respondents constituting 59.09% of the respondents
disagree. This finding agree with (“Social Security in African context”, p.23) which states that
pensioners/recipients, but to assist them “maintain a minimum living standard” after retirement.
Also in response to the second research question, To what extent, is the income from pension
sustaining retirees of the National Social Security and Welfare Corporation, the study shows that
26 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 59.09% of the respondents agreed that the income
from pension is assisting them maintain a minimum living standard; while 18 out of the total of 44
respondents representing 40.91% of the respondents disagree. This finding agrees with (NRTA
Pension Education Toolkit, 2021) that states that social security provides a guaranteed, cost-of-
living adjusted income for life in retirement, and has proven to be an effective way to keep retirees
out of poverty; and it is the foundation of retirement security for millions of retirees and their
families.
Finally, in response to the third research question, What can be done to improve pension benefits
for retirees at the National Social Security and Welfare Corporation, the study shows that 34 out of
the total of 44 respondents which is 77.27% of the respondents strongly agreed that NASSCORP
retirees’ pension benefits can be improved by increasing employees’ salaries; while 10 out of the
total of 44 respondents representing 22.73% of the respondents disagreed. This finding agrees with
(S. Dahnne Daniels, 2022) that states that since in fact benefits are the function of one’s earning,
employers will need to increase employee’s individual earning (salaries, allowances, bonuses, etc.)
to enable them to receive better retirement benefits when they are no longer working due to old age
and or disablement.
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMNENDATION
5.1 Summary
Having collected, presented, analyzed and interpreted the data from the respondents including data
from the study, the student researcher at this point has summarized the findings in response to the
following research questions. To what degree, economically speaking, does the National Pension
Scheme impact NASSCORP retirees? To what extent, is the income from pension sustaining
retirees of the National Social Security and Welfare Corporation? What can be done to improve
1. The National Pension Scheme has less economic impact on the livelihood of NASSCORP
retirees. The income they receive from pension is insufficient to pay for living expense,
medical care cost, travel, child’s support (including cost of child’s education, medical,
amongst others). Understandably, pension is in fact an adjusted cost of living expense for
one in retirement which is less than emoluments received while one was actively in
insurable employment.
2. In response to the second question, respondents admitted that while the income receive
from the social security pension made less substantive economic impact on their livelihood,
paying rent (if retiree had not built his or her house), purchasing of provisions and supplies
3. In response to the third question, respondents maintain that NASSCORP retirees’ pension
benefits can be improved provided Management (a) increases employees’ monthly earnings
while they are in active insurable employment and (b) augment the retirement package, by
providing for the free medical care for retirees, since because of their advanced age, this is
This study sought to find answer to the following research questions, which include;
1. To what degree, economically speaking, does the National Pension Scheme impact
NASSCORP retirees?
2. To what extent, is the income from pension sustaining retirees of the National Social
3. What can be done to improve pension benefits for retirees at the National Social Security
In the process to achieve the aims of the study, the researcher conducted focus group discussions,
semi-structured interviews and key informants interviews with the participation of all major
stakeholders including key offices of the National Social Security and Welfare Corporation
(NASSCORP), and retirees of NASSCORP. The findings revealed that the National Pension
Scheme is making less impact economically on retirees of the National Social Security and
Welfare Corporation. The income received from pension does not take care of most NASSCORP
retirees living expenses, since in fact pension is a cost-of-living adjusted income for life in
retirement. In response to the first research question, To what degree, economically speaking, does
the National Pension Scheme impact NASSCORP’s retirees, the study shows that 18 out of the
total of 44 respondents constituting 40.91% of the respondents agreed that the national pension
program is economically impacting their livelihood; while 26 out of the total of 44 respondents
constituting 59.09% of the respondents disagree. The income from pension is sustaining retirees of
the National Social Security and Welfare Corporation to some extent. The income from pension is
assisting NASSCORP retirees’ maintain a minimum living standard. Since in fact it is a cost-of-
living adjusted income for life in retirement. The income received from pension contributes to
house rent, edible provision (food, groceries etc.), and needed wearing. in response to the second
research question, To what extent, is the income from pension sustaining retirees of the National
Social Security and Welfare Corporation, the study shows that 26 out of the total of 44 respondents
which is 59.09% of the respondents agreed that the income from pension is assisting them
maintain a minimum living standard; while 18 out of the total of 44 respondents representing
40.91% of the respondents disagree. in response to the second research question, To what extent, is
the income from pension sustaining retirees of the National Social Security and Welfare
Corporation, the study shows that 26 out of the total of 44 respondents which is 59.09% of the
respondents agreed that the income from pension is assisting them maintain a minimum living
standard; while 18 out of the total of 44 respondents representing 40.91% of the respondents
disagree. Lastly, NASSCORP retirees’ pension benefits came be improved by increasing
employees’ salaries and retirement package. Since in fact benefits are the function of one’s
earning. In response to the third research question, What can be done to improve pension benefits
for retirees at the National Social Security and Welfare Corporation, the study shows that 34 out of
the total of 44 respondents which is 77.27% of the respondents strongly agreed that NASSCORP
retirees’ pension benefits can be improved by increasing employees’ salaries; while 10 out of the
5.3 Recommendation
independently, without the knowledge of what other parties do and how combined efforts can yield
better results. However, in the fast changing and developing world, such approach is deemed
ineffective. Thus, after cautiously analyzing the data presented and followed by the conclusions
drew from study findings, the researcher therefore wish to advance few recommendations that seek
the need for economic impact of the National Pension Scheme, and such should be taken into
1. That the Government of Liberia through National Social Security and Welfare Corporation
(NASSCORP), develops a clear and concise policy that will provide health care benefits
for NASSCORP retirees. Since in fact medical care benefits is the most essential
(NASSCORP) provides financial assistance for NASSCORP retirees under its Corporate
3. That the Management of the National Social Security and Welfare Corporation
employee’s of the Corporation. Since in fact benefits are the function of one’s earning; to
enable them to receive better retirement benefits when they are no longer working due to
The study assesses the economic impact of the National Pension program on the lives of
former NASSCORP employees who were retired in 2019 – 2021. It is based on an Asante’s
assertion (1987) that many Liberian workers scam to evade retirement because they think
retirement induces poverty, as well as isolates them from the main stream of the working
population. This study provides information to guide those who formulate pension policies
that will amply impact the economic life of retirees. Also, it informs national framers of
pension programs to consider retirement packages that are economically feasible and
From analysis of the survey, in which 44 participants, 25 males and 19 females, were
pension only affords them a minimum living standard, while 18 respondents expressed
10 respondents, or 22.73%, did not agreed with salary increment. The researcher
recommends: 1. That the Iberian Government, through the National Social Security and
Welfare Corporation, develops a clear and concise policy that will provide health care
benefits for NASSCORP retirees. 2. That the NASSCORP management includes its retirees
as beneficiaries under its corporate social responsibility program. 3. That the NASSCORP
the Corporation, so as to enable retirees receive substantive benefit package when they are
retired. This certainly will augment the economic status of retirees who are longer